When you say that someone can shift and “take their followers with them” e.g. TYT in reality or AOC hypothetically in the future, are they actually “taking” them or are they all shifting together? A la Beatlemania being a combinatorily directed effort/input/experience between the Beatles and the Beatles fans.
58:41 that was actually a terrible place to wrap, arguably the worse out of the entire episode. Samo was mid sentence on his free game tangent, about to balance out his left wing take with a right wing one. Oh well.
Ugh, for a second I thought this was new, but no, it's another frustrating reupload. I can't bring myself to thumbs-down Samo, but I don't like this repackaging.
Another banger. Samo killed it.
The points about AOC and brands were original take that make this show unique.
Very good convo
Good shit, guys 🎉
11:49 - I'm trying to imagine an AOC whose in with Mary Harrington and Louise Perry... it's hard to visualize.
When you say that someone can shift and “take their followers with them” e.g. TYT in reality or AOC hypothetically in the future, are they actually “taking” them or are they all shifting together? A la Beatlemania being a combinatorily directed effort/input/experience between the Beatles and the Beatles fans.
58:41 that was actually a terrible place to wrap, arguably the worse out of the entire episode. Samo was mid sentence on his free game tangent, about to balance out his left wing take with a right wing one. Oh well.
Ugh, for a second I thought this was new, but no, it's another frustrating reupload. I can't bring myself to thumbs-down Samo, but I don't like this repackaging.
are you paying?