Ebert & Roeper (2000): Drowning Mona, My Dog Skip, The Next Best Thing & Miss Julie
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 сер 2024
- 0:00 Intro
0:52 Drowning Mona: 👎👎
4:15 My Dog Skip: 👍👍
7:55 What Planet Are You From? Ebert 👎 & Roeper 👍
11:44 The Next Best Thing: 👎👎
14:59 Miss Julie: Ebert 👍 & Roeper 👎
Video pick of the week
18:07 The John Belushi Collection
Animal House (1978)
The Blues Brothers (1980)
1941 (1979)
19:26 The reviews
Their comments on Miss Julie were unforgettable!
I got a full recording of this episode too, with commercials and all.
Only movie worth recommend is My Dog Skip 👍⭐⭐⭐
I agree with Richard Roeper’s review of What Planet Are You From?
10:17 my reaction when I heard a woman say “The Happytime Murders” was funnier than “Roger Rabbit.”
Richard Roper: He's an attractive young boy
Roeper gave 3 appendages up for Agent Cody Banks.
Yep, he really said that.
What Roeper meant was that Frankie Muniz has a great screen presence and people will watch the movies that he's in. It had nothing to do with what you think it was. It was so way not that.
Come on, you know what he meant. Get your head out of the gutters.
A Los Angeles Yoga Instructor named Abbey-That's funny:)
Nice to see better quality.
Next Best Thing was directed by John Schlesinger!?
Roeper might have been better off as a co-host on Entertainment Tonight. "A luuuuuudicrous courtroom drama."
Was this the first time Roeper guested?
Siskel and ebert r both dead but were still stuck with Roeper..... ughh
I like Roeper actually. I thought he was a good replacement for Siskel. Sure he's not perfect, but I think he's pretty accurate in his reviews. I enjoyed watching him discuss movies when the show became Ebert and Roeper and I also enjoyed reading his reviews in the Sun-Times. He made Ebert and Roeper fun to watch.
@@musicman76enator i appreciate that Gene and Roger's chemistry would be impossible to recreate. I get that, but Roeper just agreed with roger WAY to much. the sparks never really flew
@@crakatoot5480 Well I think otherwise. IMO I think Roeper did not agree with Ebert way too much. Roeper also had a way of getting these "sparks" to fly. Check out some other of the later years reviews from say 2003 onwards and you will see what I mean.
Roeper just wasnt at the level of gene siskel
No one's perfect
There was only one Gene Siskel. He was irreplaceable.