Awesome!!!! Unreal timing, my band is about to record vocals on our album and I was looking for some advice!! Thank you so much again, your videos have been huge in helping me and my band record and mix our album properly! You rule Bobby!!
I always roll off low end with a 12dB highpass filter up to 200 Hz. I then have less to filter out with the parametric band @ 200 Hz - 250 Hz. It's practically the same but i catch frequencies with the highpass, that you are catching with the parametric EQ.
I like this advice a lot, and I will remember it. Its all about cleaning up the low end before applying harder processing. Now I didn't really understand the purpose of the slight saturation at the beginning and why its so important, Is that to soften the peaks? Normally if I wanted to apply subtle saturation I would do it after compression so that it would be applied more evenly across all volumes
Thanks Bobby. Love your videos. Quick question. When you're "going for gain reduction" are you trying to get a specific amount of gain reduction for specific types of processing, or is that just where it ends up after you go through the process? You reference this a lot in your videos, and I'm super confused by what you mean. Do you have any tutorials specifically on this "gain reduction" issue?
My stock equalizers doesn't have that visual, neither do my plugins, I'm using Ableton lite. Any tips there. I did use your settings as a guide though.
Hey Bobby, I dare you to attempt to use FL studio to mix raw heavy guitars 😅 huge fan and your tuts have helped me more than any other sound engineering UA-camr !
FL studio supports impulse responses through the convolver, so you could load up cab IR's to that. Though I rather recommend a vst cab loader for convenience sake. For an amp sim you might need to get an external plugin. Emissary should be good. Also with a TS999. FL studio Compressors and EQ's are good to work with so i don't see any reason why you wouldn't be able to get good results. The biggest reason people dislike FL studio is because its very unconventional as a DAW. If you're used to any other DAW and try to move over to FL you will find it to be very unintuitive and impractical
Hey bro! Nice content and nice mix!! totally digging it! Just got a question taking back to the copy and paste thing when double tracking. Is it possible to record a track, lets say 8 bar- guitar track then shuffle the bars to make it sound like 2 different di for guitar? So the 1st track consists of 1-4 bars and 5-8 bars, then the 2nd track consist of 5-8 bars then 1-4 bars. Not sure if that makes sense, I know double tracking is the best. I'm just curious about this method I thought of.
@@FrightboxRecording Awesome! Now I can rest my case knowing this works. I'll have this up in my sleeves, a tight double track still is the best. Thanks brother!
Great video, I love your content, your explanations are so clear even a thick musician like me can understand them :p; and thank you for slaying so many (expensive) myths... Would you apply this chain also when the vocals consist of several layered tracks (to make the vocals thicker, maybe adding unisons, or one track an octave lower, or with the vocals being whispered, etc...)?
most of the time the real raw (which is not processed by those fancy pre-amp stuff)is so damn dynamic, have to use brutal force compress it. sometime i just brutally use a limiter instead and ~~crush them around -30db~~ that i could only see red in my meters........xd
I agree with this guy with stock plugs but this doesn’t sound that great… the backing track also sounds so bad… if time drums sampled so they sound like popcorn…
►► Mixing Cheatsheet & Download → Get FREE access to the Crisp & Clear Heavy Mix Formula HERE:frightboxrecordingacademy.com/heavy-mix-formula/
Awesome!!!! Unreal timing, my band is about to record vocals on our album and I was looking for some advice!! Thank you so much again, your videos have been huge in helping me and my band record and mix our album properly! You rule Bobby!!
Keep me posted on how it goes!!
Totally agree I've been using the same plugin chain for vox over the last couple of years and im pretty happy with the results I get 🤘🧙♂️🤘
Clear, concise and easy to follow, your knowledge always helps. Thank you.
Amazing as always. Plus great t-shirt!
Hi - best mixing channel I've found so far on YT, very helpful videos - thanks man! 😎
would it be a good idea to use this chain on the way in? as in, recording with this chain already printed to the recorded audio
I always roll off low end with a 12dB highpass filter up to 200 Hz. I then have less to filter out with the parametric band @ 200 Hz - 250 Hz. It's practically the same but i catch frequencies with the highpass, that you are catching with the parametric EQ.
Very cool video and a great vocal chain to boot. Thanks for making these great videos mate.😉
I like this advice a lot, and I will remember it. Its all about cleaning up the low end before applying harder processing.
Now I didn't really understand the purpose of the slight saturation at the beginning and why its so important, Is that to soften the peaks?
Normally if I wanted to apply subtle saturation I would do it after compression so that it would be applied more evenly across all volumes
Perfect timing, I was just searching vocal mixing vids to fix my crappy vocals lol.
Would this chain work well on heavier vocals with growls etc as well? Or do you use a different chain for these kinds of vocals?
Hey bobby, which track is this ? If you get the chance, I have heard you work on it and found it stuck in my head but i never knew the name
Thanks Bobby. Love your videos. Quick question. When you're "going for gain reduction" are you trying to get a specific amount of gain reduction for specific types of processing, or is that just where it ends up after you go through the process? You reference this a lot in your videos, and I'm super confused by what you mean. Do you have any tutorials specifically on this "gain reduction" issue?
My stock equalizers doesn't have that visual, neither do my plugins, I'm using Ableton lite. Any tips there. I did use your settings as a guide though.
Hey Bobby, I dare you to attempt to use FL studio to mix raw heavy guitars 😅 huge fan and your tuts have helped me more than any other sound engineering UA-camr !
As long as there's a basic digital EQ in FL studio, I'm 100% sure it'll get the job done.
I use FL and i still use eveey technique bobby shares on his page. Its not really the daw, its what you know about your stock plugins :)
FL studio supports impulse responses through the convolver, so you could load up cab IR's to that. Though I rather recommend a vst cab loader for convenience sake.
For an amp sim you might need to get an external plugin. Emissary should be good. Also with a TS999.
FL studio Compressors and EQ's are good to work with so i don't see any reason why you wouldn't be able to get good results.
The biggest reason people dislike FL studio is because its very unconventional as a DAW.
If you're used to any other DAW and try to move over to FL you will find it to be very unintuitive and impractical
I usually use a de-esser early in the chain. Why use it at the end? Just curious.
Heavy compression can sometimes exaggerate sibilance, so it makes sense to de-ess after to the compression.
Awesome stuff. Quick question: are these trick sheet EQ tips for drums for MIDI drums as well, or only live drums?
Both! As long as you're mixing with raw samples.
thanks! ,are you adding any reverb or delay to the vocals?
Not in this case, the vocals are completely dry.
@@FrightboxRecording interesting , I tried out the chain for sounds way better but I think I need get better at singing lol.
Hey bro! Nice content and nice mix!! totally digging it! Just got a question taking back to the copy and paste thing when double tracking. Is it possible to record a track, lets say 8 bar- guitar track then shuffle the bars to make it sound like 2 different di for guitar? So the 1st track consists of 1-4 bars and 5-8 bars, then the 2nd track consist of 5-8 bars then 1-4 bars. Not sure if that makes sense, I know double tracking is the best. I'm just curious about this method I thought of.
Yes, I do this all of the time. You just have to be careful to make sure you don't accidentally use the same exact part on both sides.
@@FrightboxRecording Awesome! Now I can rest my case knowing this works. I'll have this up in my sleeves, a tight double track still is the best. Thanks brother!
Great video, I love your content, your explanations are so clear even a thick musician like me can understand them :p; and thank you for slaying so many (expensive) myths... Would you apply this chain also when the vocals consist of several layered tracks (to make the vocals thicker, maybe adding unisons, or one track an octave lower, or with the vocals being whispered, etc...)?
what`s the name of the band?)
most of the time the real raw (which is not processed by those fancy pre-amp stuff)is so damn dynamic, have to use brutal force compress it. sometime i just brutally use a limiter instead and ~~crush them around -30db~~ that i could only see red in my meters........xd
I use Shure 14A and I am not going to spend even a penny for a better one.
I agree with this guy with stock plugs but this doesn’t sound that great… the backing track also sounds so bad… if time drums sampled so they sound like popcorn…
Is she that great a singer or is there a tiny bit of pitch correction?
99.9% of modern productions feature some form of pitch correction. With that being said, she's a great singer, so she didn't need much.
@@FrightboxRecordingI understand that. So my question is, do you pitch correct, print, and then process?