@@fattymcbutterpants9700 🤦 I'm sorry but "dictatorship" is a meaningless word. they call cuba a dictatorship, despite them having a participatory elections for their parliamentary system, hands down 100x more democratic than USA. nobody can buy votes, and everybody gathers together to watch them count ballots. they called gaddafi's libya a dictatorship, despite them having the world's only direct (and consociational) democracy with the only checks on democratic power in place to preserve minority rights from infringement by the majority. nobody ever calls saudi arabia a dictatorship, or egypt, or iraq, or post-2011 libya. it's only enemies of the USA who are dictators. they're using your empathy to gain your consent for their geopolitics. kim jong un is no dictator. if he was, why would he need a whole room full of people to make decisions? why would they have a parliament with more political parties than USA? it doesn't make any sense. wake up. don't be naive.
@@AlexiLaiho227 wtf are you talking about? cuba is literally the longest none-monarch singular party post-nation in history. "nobody ever calls saudi arabia a dictatorship" its a literal monarchy, who the fuck do you hang with that calls SA democracy?
Saying Kim Jong Un has absolute power is completely ridiculous, knowing he can be removed from power by the supreme congress (formed by representatives elected from all regions of North Korea) at any time and replaced by another leader by election. Also he just doesn't have that much power, he has way less power than the president of the USA or any prime minister of a liberal democracy. After Kim Il Sung died his political office of president of the DPRK was eliminated and its functions were divided into three different offices: the head of government, the prime minister and president of the legislature. There are other leaders of the political administration of the country, all elected seperately to their offices by the supreme congress (while in liberal democracies the prime minister elects all the other governing offices), the president of the supreme congress' presidium, the head of the military and the supreme commander of the Korean People's Army. The political system of capitalist countries and socialist countries is very different. Socialist countries have workers councils throughout the country that each hold elections to elect among them a representative, anyone can be a representative and they're suggested to be one by the people and elected by the people usually by show of hands in local meetings where everyone over 18 can go and intervene and become a representative. Political campaigns are illegal, it's illegal to spend money to support a candidate like in capitalist countries. Then each one of those representatives goes the a larger council with the representative of other nearby regions. Then among these representatives they elect between them people to represent their region in the supreme council. Then the people elected to the supreme council elect among them individuals to a governing body to be active for most of the time. The representatives who are elected are always answerable to the people who elected them and can be removed at any time if the electors think they are having a bad time. Also there are regular mettings where the local representatives have to listen to the electors' demands and then work with the other representatives to solve the problems. This is completely different from how democracy works in capitalist countries, where the electors are given parties or candidates to vote for the one they dislike the least, having no power over who those candidates or what those parties are or what they defend in any way. In capitalist countries the parties and candidates that win the elections are almost always the ones that have the sponsors who donate the most to their political campaigns. And the biggest donators of the campaigns of the rulling parties are always capitalists that directly benefit from the policies that the parties and candidates that they give money to will put in practice in their governments. From my point of view this is basically why us communists think that liberal democracy isn't democratic at all, at least not in the sense that it represents the goals of the working class vast majority of the population. It's really a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie where the working class elect who their next exploiters will be. It just so happens to be that almost always the 2 biggest parties in every capitalist country defend economically practically the same projects, in defense of the bourgeoisie and in exploiting the working class as much as possible. They still publically oppose each other fiercily but mainly base their opposition on different social policies they want like one party is more conservative being against abortion and lgbt rights and immigrants while the other party is more socially liberal and defends legality of abortions and shit like that.
While the description of the political systems in both socialist and capitalist countries is fairly accurate, there are a few points where further clarification is needed. Additionally, it is important to note that these systems vary from country to country and can't be generalized to all socialist or capitalist nations. Regarding North Korea: Although there is a political structure in place, it is important to remember that North Korea is a totalitarian regime, where Kim Jong Un, as the Supreme Leader, holds the majority of power. The political system, including the Supreme People's Assembly and other offices, often serve as a façade for the centralized power that Kim Jong Un and the Workers' Party of Korea maintain. This means that while the system might appear to allow for the possibility of removing Kim Jong Un from power, in practice, it is unlikely to happen. The description of the democratic process in capitalist countries is oversimplified. While there is truth to the influence of money in politics, it's important to recognize that democracies vary significantly in terms of electoral systems, campaign finance regulations, and the degree of corruption. Moreover, citizens in liberal democracies can and do engage in various forms of political activism to influence policies and politicians, such as protesting, lobbying, and organizing grassroots campaigns. The portrayal of political parties in capitalist countries as primarily differentiating themselves on social issues is overly reductive. While social policies are one aspect of a party's platform, parties in liberal democracies do differ in their economic policies, including tax structures, welfare systems, and regulatory frameworks. It's true that some parties may not differ substantially on certain economic issues, but it is not universally true that all capitalist countries have two major parties that are economically identical. The assertion that the working class has no influence over political candidates or parties in capitalist countries is not entirely accurate. While there may be structural barriers that limit the influence of working-class individuals, the working class can and does engage in political activism, unionization, and voting to shape the political landscape. Furthermore, some political parties in liberal democracies are explicitly focused on representing the interests of the working class and aim to implement policies that benefit this segment of the population. In conclusion, the political systems in both socialist and capitalist countries can be complex and varied. It is important to avoid oversimplification and recognize the nuances in each system. While the description provided contains some valid points, it also presents a somewhat biased view of both socialist and capitalist political systems, which should be considered when analyzing the information.
@@bing4126 did the proletariat vote on not being able to leave the country too? Or having one family be "voted" into power every election? I thought so, even the most flawed democracies beat north korea
@@saladv6069 In the DPRK it is illegal to not vote. In the US they do everything possible to not allow poor people to vote. The DPRK is socialist not capitalist, which means production is not based on market factors , but on human need. For this to be possible there must be some level of democratic input , or else the economy would just not have lasted 70 years through war and crushing sanctions. As far as the supposed "monarchy" this is just meritocracy and nepotism. This exists everywhere. Kim Il-Sung was like George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, FDR, and whatever other people Americans think were great all rolled into one. How is anyone surprised his family are highly popular and voted in. Now explain to me how George W Bush was voted into office.
@@bing4126 Meritocracy? The family is so "loved", that no one will run against them, and no one is allowed to criticize them? Even when they forbid their people to leave, and punish entire families for the crimes of a single person? Or is all that propaganda?
@@NoName-ms8jb I didn't lied '-' they were elected, now 'nobody was elected' is a lie. (And it's a 'dictatorship of the proletariat' which is closer to real democracy than the 'dictatorship of the bourgeoisie' (which rules in basicaly every capitalist country)
@@mablejansen442 bruh.. nk is quite literally "dictatorship of the 1%". Just look at how Kim travels (Mercedes-Benz, Lexus, Private Jets) and what his citizens use to travel with (cow carts and bicycles)
They are modern, not necessarily western. The suits were probably made in Korea. Western Attire would be a Cowboy Hat and Boots, not a humble dark suit
@@crossmaster77 There are many different types of suits from all around the world, from the traditional Goodluck Jonathan suits of Africa, to the Sun Yat Sen/Mao suits of Asia.
The "funny" thing is that, in the end, most-everyone but those who spoke at this event "don't really matter", in terms of 'power and influence', let alone some kind of "independent" voice. Hell, compared to, say Kim, even almost-all of the 'higher-ups' are, to a certain degree, just "lackeys" of the 'Dear Leader' who help him run things more-easily. The others are just occasional "seatholders" or "placeholders" for the sake of making the Party-state look good, be able to 'vote for stuff' to give the appearance of "consensus" (and to do the procedures for "legislating" in general) and have a lot of 'lackeys' the higher-ups can order around and make do their bidding. and, of course, delegate various functions and duties to, to "relieve pressure" from people like Kim. Even he can't "do everything" :P
Any outsider who respects this man is an animal and should be treated as such. He is a communist dictator that starves, brainwashed, and kills his own people. They aren’t even aloud to leave. North Korea has the shittiest human rights on the planet.
Are you really happy under corporate rule? Like seriously, wherever you live, you have twice as many tyrants as North Korea. Not only do you have your government to watch out for, but you also have the private sector. Nobody elects Burger King or some leasing company into your neighborhood. All the decisions made on your behalf are made by the private sector, and you have no decision making in it. It's an illusion, and there's a lot of gas lighting into making it seem like it's your fault if you go broke. But if you go broke, it's mostly by design. Capitalism can't function without a reserve army of labor. Otherwise nobody would work for some terrible company like Amazon or McDonald's. It's merely the threat of homelessness that coerces you into your drudgery.
Besides the politics of North Korea, the Congress of the Worker’s Party of Korea is kinda beautiful from the inside but still, the Worker’s Party Congress is not limited by any Constitution that separates government power. North Korea has a one-party totalitarian dictatorship under the leadership of the Worker’s party of Korea and I read that this type of dictatorship can last for a while because the political party exists and it’s the only political party allowed in North Korea. I hope that one day the one-party totalitarian dictatorship collapse and peace will happen in the Korean Peninsula.
@@WyattPriceTV Socialism actually includes a democratically elected government with the ideals of all related property to be given/owned or operated by the workers of that nation/state.
Kalo lihat gaya hidup dia dan keluarganya, kimjongun itu bukan komunis atuh bong. Socialisnya gak ada sama sekali. Kalo orang orang liberal berhasil investasi berupa hotel hotel mewah (seperti yang dianjurkan si former tv news anchor cewek amerika berakal pendek itu), yang ada pemerintah korut itu malah makin "komunis". "komunis" loh. Bukan komunis ya. Rakus kekuasaan, gantungin hidup sama pajak. Gak ada bedanya sama liberal. Dasar media amerika.
I'd love to visit North Korea and party in some of their bars and nightclubs, have a few drinks and then pick up some gorgoeus north korean women and take them back to my hotel room and party all night long.. ( do i need visa ? )
nelson 100 I understand you are joking but it’s actually not very hard to get “in” the country. You have to schedule a tour and fly in from China. They will give you a guided tour of a portion of the country and send you back to China. As long as you don’t break any laws you’ll be perfectly fine. But since you were joking please don’t consider it.
@Pack -A- Punch great argument you really openend up my third eye here your iq must be a whooping double digit to have changed my mind with such ease in such a complicated subject
@Pack -A- Punch you saying something is better and not providing evidence as to why its better doesn't help your case please stop responding as my iq plummets to room temperature every time I read whatever you pull out of your first wordlist ass
@@thepathofeden73 ah yes socalism is when free stuff and murder you bring some great points to the table not as if any capitalist countries committed horrific genocides in the name of profit
I always dreamed that thousands of people clap their hands anytime I appeared and treated me like a an ancient Egyptian pharaohs in modern times… Helas!! Only my toilets has the same sound of thousand clapping hands 😢
Dont you see parallels to the usa? Am i crazy? Sure america is not as bad as that, but big buildings, a very powerful head of state, flags and hymns everywhere, the faces pf the founders and presidents of america everywhere?
Also... I wonder how many of the "representatives" attending are *actual workers* (or were, long-term, shortly before being "elected")? Perhaps, like the Soviet Union and China, quite a few of them were bureaucrats, administrators and the like. Or, at least, born into privileged families and backgrounds. Also... I wonder how much they had to spend on their suits, on average? Does the Party 'provide affordable suits', or does everyone "elected" to these positions have to *pay a pretty-penny out of pocket*? Is there "an abundance" of 'low-cost tailors' for "good suits" in NK? hmm
@@rythnuhh you are an animal and deserve to be treated as such. This country rules its people with fear. Anyone who is found out to be against the regime is murdered along with the rest of their family. Anyone who try’s to leave the country is shot at. Everything we know about this country comes from defectors who have told us what is like. The UN agrees that North Korea is hell on earth. They have military parades to show off their latest missiles. They threaten to bomb other countries. The fact that you are unaware of all of this treachery shows that you are extremely naive.
@@rythnuhh lol you tell me I get propaganda but you call North Korea a utopia when just about everyone says otherwise. You think you know more than the rest of the world thinks about NK, you are deluded.
They haven’t taken part in a single war in their lifetimes. The United States on the other hand has been bombing over-exploited countries into oblivion for some time now.
Against imperialists I support DPRK but sorry to say it is not a working class dictatorship,it is a beaurocratic dictatorship of rulling elite family and white color executives,in their congress there is no portrait of Marx and Lenin,the great leaders of working class,from the experience of fall of USSR and Eastern Europe,Working class dictatorship should implement through multi party state where several communist and workers parties can put their representatives in Soviet Election(burgeous parties not allowed) and workers can choose representatives and vote for the Communist party they like.
Quote from first general secretary of the SED Walter Ulbricht on East German democracy " some citizens asked why we have no opposition and think that an opposition is part of a real democracy, but democracy does not reign where various parties act against each other, where the power of the working class is divided and an opposition exists, after all an opposition in the GDR could be directed only against a policy of our government, it would therefore have to be directed against the introduction of our 45 hour work week, against the construction of an additional 100000 apartment, against our low rents, against the stability of our prices, against the machine tractor stations, against the high expenditure on science and Culture, against our peace policy, it would have to be directed against the unity of the working class, against our workers and peasants state, it would have to be in favour of employing militarists and fascists in high positions of power, of the NATO war pact and her preparations for a nuclear war, tolerating such an opposition would be criminal" In my opinion it would just give power opportunists that don't have any strong political opinions I just hopping from one to the other to try and get support it reminds me of a politician in my country when there was protests around abortion he was against it but as soon as the majority of people supported abortion he started acting like he always did support abortion opportunist don't have any strong political ideas they just want to get to the top I don't think parties should exist as an opposition maybe they should exist as like the place to represent a certain group and ideas of what they want as part of a Coalition but I would honestly support no parties as well after looking into the Cuban system and the democracy stalin wanted in the soveit Union in other to deal with its bureaucracy problem
"there is no portrait of Marx and Lenin" lol. They have their own national heroes that are more important in their eyes than Marx and Lenin. They still greatly respect the comrades who developed ideology and revolution in the way that Marx and Lenin did. But nothing will compare to the effect of seeing a hero from your own nation be glorified.
@@PhuongDPRKDaily Let me tell you something. If people are willing to risk their lives just to escape a country. Then something must be extremely wrong you think?
@Terror Siege why don’t you visit North Korea and see it for yourself if you think this is propaganda? Maybe scream that the government sucks there and see what happens...?
If there was a world cup for clapping they'd win it every time.
Lol. Clapping wins everywhere.
😂😂
westers have no self awareness. Congress does the same crap every year during the state of the union.
Because the losers go to the gulag
Damn they accomplished more in one day, than Congress has the last 100+ years.
Dictatorships make it very easy to get anything done.
@@fattymcbutterpants9700 🤦 I'm sorry but "dictatorship" is a meaningless word. they call cuba a dictatorship, despite them having a participatory elections for their parliamentary system, hands down 100x more democratic than USA. nobody can buy votes, and everybody gathers together to watch them count ballots.
they called gaddafi's libya a dictatorship, despite them having the world's only direct (and consociational) democracy with the only checks on democratic power in place to preserve minority rights from infringement by the majority.
nobody ever calls saudi arabia a dictatorship, or egypt, or iraq, or post-2011 libya. it's only enemies of the USA who are dictators.
they're using your empathy to gain your consent for their geopolitics.
kim jong un is no dictator. if he was, why would he need a whole room full of people to make decisions? why would they have a parliament with more political parties than USA?
it doesn't make any sense.
wake up. don't be naive.
@@AlexiLaiho227 wtf are you talking about? cuba is literally the longest none-monarch singular party post-nation in history.
"nobody ever calls saudi arabia a dictatorship" its a literal monarchy, who the fuck do you hang with that calls SA democracy?
@@AlexiLaiho227 You are literally braindead
ok
Imagine being so powerful you walk out on the guy that runs the country while everyone else is clapping
Walk out = execution to Death
It's amazing. The applause is all in synchronisation.
its just incredible. The supreme leader
Fucking scary. Why are egocentrists even allowed to live in our societies? The danger of their corruptness is immense
they are now calling him chairman like china did mao. He's going to make himself as big as Mao
@Channelingus Llcix He’s certainly already as fat as Mao!
Now he ded
Wernhard Bierbauer The Fourth 😂😂
Every party has a chairman. In German it's general secretary.
@@PooftMancrap Nope never
0:01 I thought he's a secruity agent and speaks into a mic but he is just eatin' his nails...
0:47 "If you're happy and you know it clap your hands"🎵🎶
"ruling elite" bro they're literally the DPRK's equivalent to Congress
Which is the ruling elite. See how that works?
Saying Kim Jong Un has absolute power is completely ridiculous, knowing he can be removed from power by the supreme congress (formed by representatives elected from all regions of North Korea) at any time and replaced by another leader by election. Also he just doesn't have that much power, he has way less power than the president of the USA or any prime minister of a liberal democracy.
After Kim Il Sung died his political office of president of the DPRK was eliminated and its functions were divided into three different offices: the head of government, the prime minister and president of the legislature. There are other leaders of the political administration of the country, all elected seperately to their offices by the supreme congress (while in liberal democracies the prime minister elects all the other governing offices), the president of the supreme congress' presidium, the head of the military and the supreme commander of the Korean People's Army.
The political system of capitalist countries and socialist countries is very different. Socialist countries have workers councils throughout the country that each hold elections to elect among them a representative, anyone can be a representative and they're suggested to be one by the people and elected by the people usually by show of hands in local meetings where everyone over 18 can go and intervene and become a representative. Political campaigns are illegal, it's illegal to spend money to support a candidate like in capitalist countries. Then each one of those representatives goes the a larger council with the representative of other nearby regions. Then among these representatives they elect between them people to represent their region in the supreme council. Then the people elected to the supreme council elect among them individuals to a governing body to be active for most of the time. The representatives who are elected are always answerable to the people who elected them and can be removed at any time if the electors think they are having a bad time. Also there are regular mettings where the local representatives have to listen to the electors' demands and then work with the other representatives to solve the problems.
This is completely different from how democracy works in capitalist countries, where the electors are given parties or candidates to vote for the one they dislike the least, having no power over who those candidates or what those parties are or what they defend in any way. In capitalist countries the parties and candidates that win the elections are almost always the ones that have the sponsors who donate the most to their political campaigns. And the biggest donators of the campaigns of the rulling parties are always capitalists that directly benefit from the policies that the parties and candidates that they give money to will put in practice in their governments. From my point of view this is basically why us communists think that liberal democracy isn't democratic at all, at least not in the sense that it represents the goals of the working class vast majority of the population. It's really a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie where the working class elect who their next exploiters will be. It just so happens to be that almost always the 2 biggest parties in every capitalist country defend economically practically the same projects, in defense of the bourgeoisie and in exploiting the working class as much as possible. They still publically oppose each other fiercily but mainly base their opposition on different social policies they want like one party is more conservative being against abortion and lgbt rights and immigrants while the other party is more socially liberal and defends legality of abortions and shit like that.
Yeah, judging from your profile pic, you are hardly unbiased. Of COURSE a communist would defend North Korea.
While the description of the political systems in both socialist and capitalist countries is fairly accurate, there are a few points where further clarification is needed. Additionally, it is important to note that these systems vary from country to country and can't be generalized to all socialist or capitalist nations.
Regarding North Korea: Although there is a political structure in place, it is important to remember that North Korea is a totalitarian regime, where Kim Jong Un, as the Supreme Leader, holds the majority of power. The political system, including the Supreme People's Assembly and other offices, often serve as a façade for the centralized power that Kim Jong Un and the Workers' Party of Korea maintain. This means that while the system might appear to allow for the possibility of removing Kim Jong Un from power, in practice, it is unlikely to happen.
The description of the democratic process in capitalist countries is oversimplified. While there is truth to the influence of money in politics, it's important to recognize that democracies vary significantly in terms of electoral systems, campaign finance regulations, and the degree of corruption. Moreover, citizens in liberal democracies can and do engage in various forms of political activism to influence policies and politicians, such as protesting, lobbying, and organizing grassroots campaigns.
The portrayal of political parties in capitalist countries as primarily differentiating themselves on social issues is overly reductive. While social policies are one aspect of a party's platform, parties in liberal democracies do differ in their economic policies, including tax structures, welfare systems, and regulatory frameworks. It's true that some parties may not differ substantially on certain economic issues, but it is not universally true that all capitalist countries have two major parties that are economically identical.
The assertion that the working class has no influence over political candidates or parties in capitalist countries is not entirely accurate. While there may be structural barriers that limit the influence of working-class individuals, the working class can and does engage in political activism, unionization, and voting to shape the political landscape. Furthermore, some political parties in liberal democracies are explicitly focused on representing the interests of the working class and aim to implement policies that benefit this segment of the population.
In conclusion, the political systems in both socialist and capitalist countries can be complex and varied. It is important to avoid oversimplification and recognize the nuances in each system. While the description provided contains some valid points, it also presents a somewhat biased view of both socialist and capitalist political systems, which should be considered when analyzing the information.
Holy yapping
Thanks for spreading the truth 🙏
Observe closely Americans, this is what real democracy looks like.
Your joking right?
@@saladv6069 You need to actually research into DPRK yourself instead of blindly believing what CNN or FOX news tells you .
@@bing4126 did the proletariat vote on not being able to leave the country too? Or having one family be "voted" into power every election? I thought so, even the most flawed democracies beat north korea
@@saladv6069 In the DPRK it is illegal to not vote. In the US they do everything possible to not allow poor people to vote.
The DPRK is socialist not capitalist, which means production is not based on market factors , but on human need.
For this to be possible there must be some level of democratic input , or else the economy would just not have lasted 70 years through war and crushing sanctions.
As far as the supposed "monarchy" this is just meritocracy and nepotism. This exists everywhere.
Kim Il-Sung was like George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, FDR, and whatever other people Americans think were great all rolled into one.
How is anyone surprised his family are highly popular and voted in.
Now explain to me how George W Bush was voted into office.
@@bing4126 Meritocracy? The family is so "loved", that no one will run against them, and no one is allowed to criticize them? Even when they forbid their people to leave, and punish entire families for the crimes of a single person? Or is all that propaganda?
What is the name of opening anthem on 0:45 ?
here:
ua-cam.com/video/OLJ5zGRDOwE/v-deo.html
aat Roger thanks you!
The title of the march is "Song of Happiness for the Great Leader." It's the official welcome march of North Korea's Supreme Leader.
Mitä meidän suomalaisten suosikkikirjailija tekee täällä??
Clap or Die
Fun fact: they were elected by the coreans
It’s a dictatorship. Nobody was elected.
@@NoName-ms8jb I didn't lied '-' they were elected, now 'nobody was elected' is a lie.
(And it's a 'dictatorship of the proletariat' which is closer to real democracy than the 'dictatorship of the bourgeoisie' (which rules in basicaly every capitalist country)
@@mablejansen442 bruh.. nk is quite literally "dictatorship of the 1%". Just look at how Kim travels (Mercedes-Benz, Lexus, Private Jets) and what his citizens use to travel with (cow carts and bicycles)
@@urwrong1713 ua-cam.com/video/kd-o17cFS4g/v-deo.html
@@mablejansen442 ua-cam.com/video/gHj7MSMcp0s/v-deo.html
it funny how they are wearing western attires
They are modern, not necessarily western. The suits were probably made in Korea. Western Attire would be a Cowboy Hat and Boots, not a humble dark suit
I believe suits r originally from Western cultures
Trang Nguyen they probably adopted them from Russia
Suits originated from Britain dude , so it was western attires.
@@crossmaster77 There are many different types of suits from all around the world, from the traditional Goodluck Jonathan suits of Africa, to the Sun Yat Sen/Mao suits of Asia.
Very informative report
Who are you to tell them
How to govern?
The "funny" thing is that, in the end, most-everyone but those who spoke at this event "don't really matter", in terms of 'power and influence', let alone some kind of "independent" voice. Hell, compared to, say Kim, even almost-all of the 'higher-ups' are, to a certain degree, just "lackeys" of the 'Dear Leader' who help him run things more-easily.
The others are just occasional "seatholders" or "placeholders" for the sake of making the Party-state look good, be able to 'vote for stuff' to give the appearance of "consensus" (and to do the procedures for "legislating" in general) and have a lot of 'lackeys' the higher-ups can order around and make do their bidding.
and, of course, delegate various functions and duties to, to "relieve pressure" from people like Kim. Even he can't "do everything" :P
You agree or you die
When you are strong All the world will respect you .. brave man .
there are very few people who respect kim
He was literally born into the position. It took basically no effort for him to get here.
Any outsider who respects this man is an animal and should be treated as such. He is a communist dictator that starves, brainwashed, and kills his own people. They aren’t even aloud to leave. North Korea has the shittiest human rights on the planet.
@@NoName-ms8jb amen.
wish to visit north korea
Show or not. I'd like to see them gradually open up. It's good for their people.
Building is really magnificent, but its atmosphere is stifling. Dear North Korean people, are you really happy under the rule of a benevolent leader?
Go and ask in north korea not on internet 🤦🏻♂️
@@comradeleppi2000 I`m not reckless to go and express my opinion in North Korea in order to be shot to death.😱😱
Are you really happy under corporate rule? Like seriously, wherever you live, you have twice as many tyrants as North Korea. Not only do you have your government to watch out for, but you also have the private sector. Nobody elects Burger King or some leasing company into your neighborhood. All the decisions made on your behalf are made by the private sector, and you have no decision making in it. It's an illusion, and there's a lot of gas lighting into making it seem like it's your fault if you go broke. But if you go broke, it's mostly by design. Capitalism can't function without a reserve army of labor. Otherwise nobody would work for some terrible company like Amazon or McDonald's. It's merely the threat of homelessness that coerces you into your drudgery.
North Koreans don’t have UA-cam💀
@@yetekt6953 Exactly! But Kim Jong-un and a few privileged North Koreans might enjoy UA-cam.
I'd also only let CNN film for 10 minutes. Capitalist mouthpiece.
Besides the politics of North Korea, the Congress of the Worker’s Party of Korea is kinda beautiful from the inside but still, the Worker’s Party Congress is not limited by any Constitution that separates government power. North Korea has a one-party totalitarian dictatorship under the leadership of the Worker’s party of Korea and I read that this type of dictatorship can last for a while because the political party exists and it’s the only political party allowed in North Korea. I hope that one day the one-party totalitarian dictatorship collapse and peace will happen in the Korean Peninsula.
Why does the reporter look like Eminem
Looks just like the State of the Union address.
0:44
THE BEAUTY OF SOCIALISM!!🤣🤣
@@WyattPriceTV Socialism actually includes a democratically elected government with the ideals of all related property to be given/owned or operated by the workers of that nation/state.
@@ferdinandstefano that doesn't work only dictatorship.
@@tradeblog8713 well yeah, kind of pointing out the obvious
beautiful country I wish to vit
tomas jesus They won't let you visit the real North Korea.
There Is no Lenin on the picture. IT Is good, when He doesn see IT.
North Korea is going to be a super interesting history topic 100 years from now
What was the police escort for? There's no one even of the fucking road.
Ese congreso siempre está lleno y por lo que veo feliz ahí si trabajan viva Corea del Norte viva México su amigo
上田上田上田上田なわくびきるなわくびきるなわくびきるなわくびきるなわくびきるぐびぐびぐびぐびぐびぐびぐびぐびそぐばんそぐばんそぐばんそぐばん卒業式卒業式
North Korea. Liminal Space: The Country.
Kalo lihat gaya hidup dia dan keluarganya, kimjongun itu bukan komunis atuh bong. Socialisnya gak ada sama sekali. Kalo orang orang liberal berhasil investasi berupa hotel hotel mewah (seperti yang dianjurkan si former tv news anchor cewek amerika berakal pendek itu), yang ada pemerintah korut itu malah makin "komunis". "komunis" loh. Bukan komunis ya. Rakus kekuasaan, gantungin hidup sama pajak. Gak ada bedanya sama liberal. Dasar media amerika.
Bener nih, pemimpin komunis yg ada pun biasanya orang ga duitnya "dikit". Kayak stalin atau mao
I'd love to visit North Korea and party in some of their bars and nightclubs, have a few drinks and then pick up some gorgoeus north korean women and take them back to my hotel room and party all night long.. ( do i need visa ? )
+nelson 100 ...and then wake up in a jail. Then after a Kangaroo court, find yourself sentenced to life in prison, or execution.
***** ..I was joking ( sarcasm )
no. you need meds
I wonder what people get up to on Fri/Sat nights
nelson 100 I understand you are joking but it’s actually not very hard to get “in” the country. You have to schedule a tour and fly in from China. They will give you a guided tour of a portion of the country and send you back to China. As long as you don’t break any laws you’ll be perfectly fine. But since you were joking please don’t consider it.
*Literally half of the people there are starving and you have this few people living in luxury!! It’s so evil!!!*
America same
This is what communism does
@@firefirefire3277 No America does not have mass starvation, please actually look at a graph
@@JamesMaximumplease look at the history. The Great Depression.
@@legendaryblood1937 The Great Depression was the fault of government getting too involved in the economy.
3000 dolars all inclusive tour
Why’s he wearing his press armband upside down?
GLORRY TO THE DPRK
@Pack -A- Punch great argument you really openend up my third eye here your iq must be a whooping double digit to have changed my mind with such ease in such a complicated subject
@Pack -A- Punch you saying something is better and not providing evidence as to why its better doesn't help your case please stop responding as my iq plummets to room temperature every time I read whatever you pull out of your first wordlist ass
@@ANTHONY-vg1be this is you: WAAAAA I can't have free stuff. WAAAAA why can't people love this genocidal regime WAAAAAA
@@thepathofeden73 ah yes socalism is when free stuff and murder you bring some great points to the table not as if any capitalist countries committed horrific genocides in the name of profit
1:01 Isn't this his uncle who he later executed?
Nope. That's a different person I think. His uncle was executed earlier than that.
I always dreamed that thousands of people clap their hands anytime I appeared and treated me like a an ancient Egyptian pharaohs in modern times… Helas!! Only my toilets has the same sound of thousand clapping hands 😢
Scary 🤐😬
Yes being on the receiving end of American imperialism and sanctions can be quite scary
Rules are rules
Dont you see parallels to the usa? Am i crazy? Sure america is not as bad as that, but big buildings, a very powerful head of state, flags and hymns everywhere, the faces pf the founders and presidents of america everywhere?
Also... I wonder how many of the "representatives" attending are *actual workers* (or were, long-term, shortly before being "elected")?
Perhaps, like the Soviet Union and China, quite a few of them were bureaucrats, administrators and the like. Or, at least, born into privileged families and backgrounds. Also... I wonder how much they had to spend on their suits, on average? Does the Party 'provide affordable suits', or does everyone "elected" to these positions have to *pay a pretty-penny out of pocket*? Is there "an abundance" of 'low-cost tailors' for "good suits" in NK?
hmm
Hvala dragom Bogu....nitko nema masku
26 until
Kim ❤️👈
there face is totally different than south
musa maqsood they are more pure than the south
The faces in South are plastics I think.
*The man reporting was probably sent to a camp too. They don’t mess around in North Korea.*
🚩🚩🚩🚩👍👍
at 0.24 serious business
❤️👈 Kim
57 to
Damm look at all those War Criminals.
Which war criminals, you mean the CNN journalists who championed basically every American-sponsored war ever? LOL
@@rythnuhh you are an animal and deserve to be treated as such. This country rules its people with fear. Anyone who is found out to be against the regime is murdered along with the rest of their family. Anyone who try’s to leave the country is shot at. Everything we know about this country comes from defectors who have told us what is like. The UN agrees that North Korea is hell on earth. They have military parades to show off their latest missiles. They threaten to bomb other countries. The fact that you are unaware of all of this treachery shows that you are extremely naive.
@@rythnuhh lol you tell me I get propaganda but you call North Korea a utopia when just about everyone says otherwise. You think you know more than the rest of the world thinks about NK, you are deluded.
@@rythnuhh everyone means everyone, not a teacher. Even the UN condemns NK. Very few people see NK as a place that isn’t complete hell.
They haven’t taken part in a single war in their lifetimes. The United States on the other hand has been bombing over-exploited countries into oblivion for some time now.
Mówi się że Kore Północna jest biedna ale wygląda identycznie jak Polska tylko że tam rząd wygląda lepiej.
Pyongyang, sure. The city is controlled by the elite, and is only 3m of the population, whilst the rest of the country is starving.
sounds fun :)
116 to 117
Maize
WOW
"workers party" my ass lmao
Sounds like someone lacks to understand what a workers party is
@@ANTHONY-vg1be looks like someone is in a capitalist country complaining about how bad they have it. Boo hoo
@@thepathofeden73 how was I complaining?
32 to
Darth Kim rules the Universe!!!!
Against imperialists I support DPRK but sorry to say it is not a working class dictatorship,it is a beaurocratic dictatorship of rulling elite family and white color executives,in their congress there is no portrait of Marx and Lenin,the great leaders of working class,from the experience of fall of USSR and Eastern Europe,Working class dictatorship should implement through multi party state where several communist and workers parties can put their representatives in Soviet Election(burgeous parties not allowed) and workers can choose representatives and vote for the Communist party they like.
Quote from first general secretary of the SED Walter Ulbricht on East German democracy
" some citizens asked why we have no opposition and think that an opposition is part of a real democracy, but democracy does not reign where various parties act against each other, where the power of the working class is divided and an opposition exists, after all an opposition in the GDR could be directed only against a policy of our government, it would therefore have to be directed against the introduction of our 45 hour work week, against the construction of an additional 100000 apartment, against our low rents, against the stability of our prices, against the machine tractor stations, against the high expenditure on science and Culture, against our peace policy, it would have to be directed against the unity of the working class, against our workers and peasants state, it would have to be in favour of employing militarists and fascists in high positions of power, of the NATO war pact and her preparations for a nuclear war, tolerating such an opposition would be criminal"
In my opinion it would just give power opportunists that don't have any strong political opinions I just hopping from one to the other to try and get support it reminds me of a politician in my country when there was protests around abortion he was against it but as soon as the majority of people supported abortion he started acting like he always did support abortion opportunist don't have any strong political ideas they just want to get to the top
I don't think parties should exist as an opposition maybe they should exist as like the place to represent a certain group and ideas of what they want as part of a Coalition but I would honestly support no parties as well after looking into the Cuban system and the democracy stalin wanted in the soveit Union in other to deal with its bureaucracy problem
"there is no portrait of Marx and Lenin" lol. They have their own national heroes that are more important in their eyes than Marx and Lenin. They still greatly respect the comrades who developed ideology and revolution in the way that Marx and Lenin did. But nothing will compare to the effect of seeing a hero from your own nation be glorified.
It is fascinating how things work in a dictatorship.
សួស្តីមេមេទាំងអស់ ភ្លេចជំរាបមេមេ ចំនុចខ្លះញុមលើកមក គ្រន់ជាមតិ រឺ យោបល់ខ្លះទេ មិនហ៊ានធ្វើអីសំរេចតាមញុមទេ ជាយោបល់តិតួច នបានមេមេជួុយេជាគុណដ៍មហាធំធេងណាស់ហើយ
In 1:32 the picture of the woman crying why’ll Kim Jon un is between them smiling with sun glass is hysterical to me.
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Ard ist auch da haha
Oh foreign a aloud great
5000 dolar all inclusive vacantion Kim supreme lider of Corea exclusivist comunist vacantion
The more normal they try to be the more crazy they come across.
These are the people the norks should are looking for, not Otto.
114
Yes, things do get done..... But dictatorships are extremely dangerous, repressive, and unbearable to live in so many ways!!!
American propagandists are proud of you.
oowoowoowowoowo
Marx bless the Workers Party!
Seems like too many Senators for a small country.
They are not senators, they are party congress delegates, after all 16% of the 25 million citizens are party members
@@PhuongDPRKDaily Let me tell you something. If people are willing to risk their lives just to escape a country. Then something must be extremely wrong you think?
More representatives means more accurate representation.
@@lol-ti6rq I recomend watching "the Loyal Citizens of Pyongyang"
This will be America under a Trump "presidency". Trump 2016-2046 !
good scare tactic bad im voting for Trump
Trump is already 70 years old tho....
More like Biden now
45
If they knew what he was saying, he would of been dead already
You can be sure that they have understood
Bravo kim jong Un je vous félicite pour votre Ascension. :)
Félicitons la Corée du Nord pour la misère qu'elle fait subir à son peuple.
*Comunism Reichstag*
Something about this seems off
@Terror Siege why don’t you visit North Korea and see it for yourself if you think this is propaganda? Maybe scream that the government sucks there and see what happens...?
@Neverlandia lol why would I risk my life just to satisfy an idiot on the internet?
ខុសឆ្គងសុំអធ្យាស្រ័យញុមផង
和中国真他妈太像了
no
There is no difference God & Kim Jong un both ruling cruely
Far left country