[HoI4] AI-Only Timelapse - BRICS vs NATO

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 сер 2020
  • HoI4 AI-only Millenium Dawn scenario with two of the most powerful factions featured on this planet heading into a full kinetic conflict. While BRICS is not a military alliance, they include some of the strongest and capable nations of this world. But is that enough to take down NATO?
    Join us on Discord! - / discord
    Web site - www.gamewatcher.com/
    Patreon support - / gamewatcheryt
    Millennium Dawn: Modern Day mod
    steamcommunity.com/sharedfile...
    Hearts of Iron 4 AI only simulation.
    Settings:
    Default
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,7 тис.

  • @Walmart_Discount
    @Walmart_Discount 3 роки тому +3785

    NATO: oh no we have never invaded Russia before
    Germany: MY TIME HAS COME!

    • @battlestar7615
      @battlestar7615 3 роки тому +338

      France: Am I a joke to you?

    • @danur5939
      @danur5939 3 роки тому +42

      @Kian macatuno damn, the comeback🔥

    • @Walmart_Discount
      @Walmart_Discount 3 роки тому +90

      Napoleon invading Russia: Ima rek uuuuuuu..... ohhhhhhhhh uhhhhhhh
      Germany invading Russia ww1: GET REKT BOI YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA IM BETTER THEN NAPOLEAn fine white peace. Woah woah what NO STOP HOW WHAT YOU DONT HAVE RUSSIA HOW ARE YOU SO G......
      Germany invading Russia take 2: REKKKKKKKKTTTTTTTTTTTT OH UHHHHH 3 front war? Thanks
      Nato invading Russia: Ohhhhh uhhhhhhhh somebody call Germany this is normal for him

    • @adamporter3402
      @adamporter3402 3 роки тому +89

      @@Walmart_Discount Germany in WW1 technically successfully took out Russia

    • @thordonner8000
      @thordonner8000 3 роки тому +57

      @@Walmart_Discount russia lost to the german empire in 1917.

  • @TheTfrules
    @TheTfrules 3 роки тому +2924

    That encirclement in Poland was fantastic, potentially a turning point in the war

    • @GameWatcher545
      @GameWatcher545  3 роки тому +511

      Indeed, almost 700k men and 15k tanks lost. That couldn't have went much worse for BRICS.

    • @celestialorb1680
      @celestialorb1680 3 роки тому +58

      GameWatcher yea

    • @reapervalentin9167
      @reapervalentin9167 3 роки тому +24

      @@GameWatcher545 what music did you used in this video?

    • @andresmartinezramos7513
      @andresmartinezramos7513 3 роки тому +39

      @@reapervalentin9167 Hell March - Red Alert OST

    • @SwagSwan9
      @SwagSwan9 3 роки тому +13

      I love poland

  • @pretzelearthsociety9975
    @pretzelearthsociety9975 3 роки тому +1615

    UK: *fighting WW3*
    Scotland: haha lol nope

    • @Walmart_Discount
      @Walmart_Discount 3 роки тому +90

      NATO discord call:
      UK: WW3 started we are at war!
      User Scotland has left your channel

    • @malcolmjcullen
      @malcolmjcullen 3 роки тому +21

      17th of April, 2025. Independence Day!

    • @top8753
      @top8753 3 роки тому +12

      Switerland:excuse but what going on guys
      NATO & BRICS: WW3

    • @kenji214245
      @kenji214245 3 роки тому +10

      @@top8753 Haha yeah Meanwhile Finland and Sweden sit up there like paranoid hermits just screaming across the border the moment anything gets close. XD

    • @KaiserStormTracking
      @KaiserStormTracking 3 роки тому +3

      @@Walmart_Discount Lol, its worse for switzerland

  • @athenian9795
    @athenian9795 3 роки тому +1921

    Nato:" We are going to invade Russia"
    France & Germany: "Say no more!"

    • @BATMAN-vz9xf
      @BATMAN-vz9xf 3 роки тому +35

      Both Berlin and Paris will be taken again)

    • @bruh-mm3ux
      @bruh-mm3ux 3 роки тому +97

      Well, only Mongols, French and Polish ever occupied Moscow

    • @BATMAN-vz9xf
      @BATMAN-vz9xf 3 роки тому +20

      @@bruh-mm3ux
      But in the end they lost and occupied them, and the Russians generally divided Poland two times (

    • @BATMAN-vz9xf
      @BATMAN-vz9xf 3 роки тому +29

      @@bruh-mm3ux and by the way, during the war with France, Moscow was not the capital of Russia

    • @bruh-mm3ux
      @bruh-mm3ux 3 роки тому +12

      @@BATMAN-vz9xf they divided Poland, only with German help

  • @gregorykafanelis5093
    @gregorykafanelis5093 3 роки тому +1284

    When you realize Germany has infinite American oil for her tanks
    *BLITZKRIEG INTENSIFIES*

    • @soppa24
      @soppa24 3 роки тому +80

      His* Germany calls their lands the Fatherland

    • @gregorykafanelis5093
      @gregorykafanelis5093 3 роки тому +20

      @@soppa24 In my native language Germany is feminine.Do countries even have genders in English?

    • @KaiserStormTracking
      @KaiserStormTracking 3 роки тому +78

      @@gregorykafanelis5093 Germany os well known as the fatherland while Russia is the Motherland and whats in between the both
      Poland

    • @Soonshain
      @Soonshain 3 роки тому +10

      @@soppa24 Countries as well as things such as boats, airplanes etc. are generally referred to as female in English though.

    • @thespanishinquisition3744
      @thespanishinquisition3744 3 роки тому +15

      @@KaiserStormTracking the abused child

  • @alfredlu7228
    @alfredlu7228 3 роки тому +614

    *JAPAN: POPCORN*

  • @missk1697
    @missk1697 3 роки тому +1048

    In reality, it would end with nuclear winter

    • @martenkahr3365
      @martenkahr3365 3 роки тому +82

      Nah, at this point it would probably end with just fixing climate change.

    • @clazzo6231
      @clazzo6231 3 роки тому +58

      @@martenkahr3365Lmao i disagree @Marten, china if they had full opportunity would happily try to blow NATO to shit no matter if the earth is in a better shape, #NATO ALL THE WAY!!!

    • @chaechae.3228
      @chaechae.3228 3 роки тому +73

      @@martenkahr3365 Yeah, China would immediately fire off nuclear weapons if the war hit their home turf.

    • @martenkahr3365
      @martenkahr3365 3 роки тому +9

      I meant that the nuclear "winter" from all the nukes would just about balance out with climate change to something that's just about alright to live in (if not for all the radiation).

    • @chaechae.3228
      @chaechae.3228 3 роки тому +45

      @@martenkahr3365 Uhhh... I sincerely doubt that. Just all of the fallout and particles in the air making radioactive clouds and rain would destroy ecosystems worldwide, the very same clouds would block out almost all sunlight (the cause of the nuclear winter), PLUS the collapse of society isn't really a landscape that is "just about alright"

  • @ricardosiqueirafilho308
    @ricardosiqueirafilho308 3 роки тому +992

    Russian and Chinese frontier: We are losing troops, but we managed to hold them back.
    Brazil: PLEASE SOMEONE HELP ME AAAAAA!

    • @user-vt4eo6cw5e
      @user-vt4eo6cw5e 3 роки тому +170

      it is but it wouldn't be like that in real life, brazil has the best survival course in the jungle, and a considerable military force, if there were really so many countries attacking at the same time, we might not last long in common ground but it wouldn't be easy invading rio de janeiro or são paulo, there are communities that even have war tanks in brazil XD, and in the jungle they would have a lot of work to defeat our army.

    • @patel6029
      @patel6029 3 роки тому +67

      In nato only America
      In brics evry country are superpower

    • @pixynowwithevenmorebelkanb6965
      @pixynowwithevenmorebelkanb6965 3 роки тому +9

      NATO fulfilled Brazil wish

    • @bernardomenezes808
      @bernardomenezes808 3 роки тому +42

      But of course, Brazil is in isolated to the other BRICS, except South África, that it isn't a real military power

    • @speedy01247
      @speedy01247 3 роки тому +44

      Brazil might keep the Amazon, but much of their coasts could be taken with some effort. (though some is an understatement, Brazil would be very difficult to conquer)

  • @Gruntness5
    @Gruntness5 3 роки тому +437

    Ignoring the nonsense alliances and dumb AI this was actually the best modern world HOI4 timelapse I've seen so far. Huge pitched battles between two giant, more or less equivalent factions with huge armies absolutely everywhere
    It's pretty neat how South Africa became the stepping stone for BRICS reinforcements on their way to the Brazilian Front

  • @sweetballs4742
    @sweetballs4742 3 роки тому +859

    Every BRIC's member a gansta 'til Vietnam (a two timing winning socialist nation against two western powers before) join NATO xD

    • @LiterallyWho1917
      @LiterallyWho1917 3 роки тому +181

      The only thing Vietnam hate more than capitalist western imperialism is China

    • @sweetballs4742
      @sweetballs4742 3 роки тому +97

      @@LiterallyWho1917 kinda ironic that they have a lot of western companies too tbh. But atleast, it's better to adapt that way than being a stubborn like North Korea.
      Edit: Isn't Vietnam and China hate each other already hundred years ago before socialism was a thing there?

    • @Notmyday2009
      @Notmyday2009 3 роки тому +70

      @@sweetballs4742 Yes. China at one point in the past conquer them and they have no forgotten that event. So this was very on brand they hate China and powerful one specially with India gone as China rival they would throw themselves to anybody that oppose them. Purely to survive as state. Wither this India-China alliance be threat to them or not the mere existent of such thing be taken as existential threat.

    • @LiterallyWho1917
      @LiterallyWho1917 3 роки тому +2

      @@sweetballs4742 yes

    • @PrimusGladius
      @PrimusGladius 3 роки тому +44

      @@sweetballs4742 Of the Vietnamese it's said they fought America for ten years, France for a hundred years, and China for a thousand.

  • @EZ-cz5en
    @EZ-cz5en 3 роки тому +303

    Vietnam: Joins NATO
    USA: YOU?
    France: Oh boy here we go again

    • @supertheblueoctagon
      @supertheblueoctagon 2 роки тому +28

      i mean irl their relations are pretty good and in a war between usa and china vietnam sides with usa

    • @ScuffTuff
      @ScuffTuff 2 роки тому +21

      I’m pretty sure Vietnam stays neutral in a war between the US and China. They’d obviously prefer an American victory but they have nothing to gain and everything to lose from getting involved. That’s pretty much the same for all of the ASEAN countries. Japan, Australia, and the UK are the most likely to get involved, followed by other NATO members, and less likely India or South Korea. Unless North Korea tried striking at an opportunity which is pretty 50/50, I can’t see most of NATO or SK getting involved.

    • @supertheblueoctagon
      @supertheblueoctagon 2 роки тому +4

      @@ScuffTuff i meant on like a ww3 scenario on where everyone is involved, you dont need to write a paragraph

    • @ScuffTuff
      @ScuffTuff 2 роки тому +3

      @HumorGames My bad, I wasn’t trying to come at you. I just kinda wanted to share haha

    • @theheadbandguy8921
      @theheadbandguy8921 2 роки тому +1

      @@ScuffTuff it’s ok man I Wright stuff like this all the time.

  • @g.r.senterprisevenatorclas7314
    @g.r.senterprisevenatorclas7314 3 роки тому +466

    BRICs Airforce got shredded and never recovered, allied Air Power really helped.

    • @bartdr5146
      @bartdr5146 3 роки тому +33

      Ye I think that why NATO won

    • @unserkatzenland8884
      @unserkatzenland8884 3 роки тому +9

      Factories won the day

    • @TheNecropolis20
      @TheNecropolis20 3 роки тому +6

      We go to war with
      I know BRICs I is for India but they should be a ally county on NATOs SIDE.
      These are Axis powers in the next war in the 2017 to 2030 time period.
      1 Russia
      (We got to get them Cyber attackers , " remember the Main " / the colonial pipeline hack )
      2 Belarus
      3 China
      4 North Korea
      6 Iran
      7 Palestinian Territories (Gaza Strip and West Bank)
      (we got to get the Hamas group taken care off )

    • @TheNecropolis20
      @TheNecropolis20 2 роки тому

      at Discord Chaos - there are people in here that dont wish well for America and the world...
      They Want the Russians and the terrorists to bring down the government...these are John Titors friends.
      this is the order of apocalyptic events -
      1 Pandemic , 2 Civil War II , 3 World War III and then 4 destroyed world by 2036.
      from
      wingmaker Jonathan
      necropolis the stock market oracle of Ohio Holding $TONR , $BKTI , $GOED and $AMC

    • @whitezombie10
      @whitezombie10 2 роки тому +1

      NATO

  • @user-ws5gj3bc2g
    @user-ws5gj3bc2g 3 роки тому +143

    Only one BRICS plane survived and fought during last days of BRICS...

  • @randombikerides3880
    @randombikerides3880 2 роки тому +46

    Only in your biggest dream Brazilian military would lose control over our northern side (amazon rain forest). Just imagine Vietna 30x bigger.

    • @TheNerdForAllSeasons
      @TheNerdForAllSeasons Рік тому

      You're also strategically irrelevant. We'd just blockade you and leave you there.

    • @WearyFeline
      @WearyFeline Рік тому

      Preach

    • @godusopp487
      @godusopp487 9 місяців тому

      You realize that would be way worse for Brazil a million Vietnamese were killed compared to 58,000 Americans times that by 30 not looking to good for Brazil

  • @ucnghia9003
    @ucnghia9003 3 роки тому +152

    Vietnam is actually too hard to be capitulated.

    • @jackbanxian
      @jackbanxian 2 роки тому +1

      lol we all know what's gonna happen irl.

    • @krishnamandal9339
      @krishnamandal9339 2 роки тому +2

      What if giant armies bomb whole Vietnam

    • @ucnghia9003
      @ucnghia9003 2 роки тому +2

      @@krishnamandal9339 Nah, I don't think that is a good idea. Vietnamese people can do anything to survive. If you bomb them, you still lost the war. There no invader can beat them. For example: The Vietnam war :D

    • @zamxn2429
      @zamxn2429 2 роки тому +5

      @@ucnghia9003 however, although I'm not saying they could capitulate Vietnam, Brazilian armies could give them a good match since they also have experience of fighting in jungles.

    • @homeone4237
      @homeone4237 2 роки тому +1

      @@zamxn2429 only a small portion of brazil is even jungle. brazil would not stand a chance of any nato invasion. there is no matchup. the deadliest casualties is maybe Rio de Janeiro and the amazon

  • @sirfeedsalot9145
    @sirfeedsalot9145 3 роки тому +335

    A lot of what ifs, but it's AI so... pretty cool to see how it may happen though, althought that India and China alliance, it's like North and South Korea against Japan...

    • @GameWatcher545
      @GameWatcher545  3 роки тому +94

      Not to mention Pakistan also joining in with India. Just minor details for the AI apparently

    • @sirfeedsalot9145
      @sirfeedsalot9145 3 роки тому +41

      @@GameWatcher545 Oh yeah forgot about that rivalry Hahahaha

    • @darthluka0794
      @darthluka0794 3 роки тому +3

      or vietnam

    • @Erreul
      @Erreul 3 роки тому +3

      Stupider shit has happened before.

    • @greasher926
      @greasher926 3 роки тому +10

      @@GameWatcher545 well Russia, China, India and Pakistan are all members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)
      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_Cooperation_Organisation

  • @Robbini0
    @Robbini0 3 роки тому +118

    Imagine being the pilot of that last BRICS plane before they surrendered. Since it says only 1 air force left at 5:29
    They might've been one of the 6-7000 pilots at the start of the war in January 2017, but which had dipped into 3 digits in February 2018 and never rosen into 4 digits again, wandering between two and three digit numbers until 2026 when they surrendered.
    Imagine being that guy. The one surviving pilot of an 9 year war for a side which might've had ten thousand pilots, aircrews and intact planes throughout the war, and only he survived it intact and never shot down.

    • @neeklmamp4955
      @neeklmamp4955 2 роки тому +12

      A war hero

    • @xornxenophon3652
      @xornxenophon3652 Рік тому +6

      Probably one guy with a lot of humility and no fear of anything in live (or as we say in Germany: "I survived the war, so I will probably also survive your mother, Erika...."

    • @peterstroe1216
      @peterstroe1216 Рік тому +1

      @@xornxenophon3652 I don't quite get the German saying

    • @xornxenophon3652
      @xornxenophon3652 Рік тому +4

      @@peterstroe1216 The guy is comparing his horrible experiences in ww2 with his wive; he vows that he will not only survive ww2 but also his wive...

    • @peterstroe1216
      @peterstroe1216 Рік тому +1

      @@xornxenophon3652 That makes sense. Thanks for sharing!

  • @hunterg24
    @hunterg24 3 роки тому +226

    I notice that BRICS air power gets wiped out early on and never recovers. I wonder if that contributed to NATO success

    • @SM-ys8lw
      @SM-ys8lw 3 роки тому +30

      in this game that's what won them it you need cas air superiority to push

    • @speedy01247
      @speedy01247 3 роки тому +13

      @@SM-ys8lw Probably why I am always having a hard time pushing, I tend to Neglect the Airforce and when I actually work on it I tend to go for Tactical bombers and Heavy fighters, rather then CAS cause Tactical bombs are versatile. (but much worse at close air support then actual CAS)

    • @fatstacksfatlips8708
      @fatstacksfatlips8708 3 роки тому +9

      @@speedy01247 Tactical bombers are trash and Heavy Fighters are too niche, just build cas and normal fighters

    • @Robbini0
      @Robbini0 3 роки тому +14

      Imagine being the pilot of that last BRICS plane before they surrendered. Since it says only 1 air force left at 5:29
      They might've been one of the 6-7000 pilots at the start of the war in January 2017, but which had dipped into 3 digits in February 2018 and never rosen into 4 digits again, wandering between two and three digit numbers until 2026 when they surrendered.
      Imagine being that guy. The one surviving pilot of an 9 year war for a side which might've had ten thousand pilots, aircrews and intact planes throughout the war, and only he survived it intact and never shot down.

    • @_han212
      @_han212 3 роки тому +8

      Pls understand that this is not reality , it's just a game . Yes in the past nato countries were powerful , but now bricks countries are catching up . the 2nd , 3rd and 4th powerful countries are Russia , china and India . And in future Asia will become the economic and military hub of the world . Bricks would be more powerful. NATO cannot control the huge population of BRICKS .

  • @franciscofranco8006
    @franciscofranco8006 3 роки тому +87

    Not sure if you've done this before, but an ideology war on the 1939 [Not 1936 because we must have Nationalist Spain :D] start date map (All Starting Fascist nations on one team, all Democratic nations on one team ect.)

    • @GameWatcher545
      @GameWatcher545  3 роки тому +22

      Hello Franco. Well that sounds interesting to me. Will explore further :)

    • @starwarzchik112
      @starwarzchik112 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah that’s a little something called real life :P

  • @jakobhawkins77
    @jakobhawkins77 3 роки тому +41

    The encirclement in Poland and a quick defeat in Brazil made a easy front for Nato. Plus with Vietnam joining, it allows a safe landing for Nato instead of trying for a beachhead

    • @p_HoE_niX
      @p_HoE_niX 2 роки тому

      Only odd thing is NATO will never be able to land in vietnam, they will be shot down from all three possible directions that is through South asia sea, indian ocean, and directly through china, Both india and china have Defense shields at these choke points.

    • @Destroyer1681
      @Destroyer1681 2 роки тому +1

      Brasil you managed to take the coast when you enter the country, especially amazons, you don't even need a soldier, own animals there would be an end Jungle

    • @camilopetric1886
      @camilopetric1886 10 місяців тому

      ai want to kill al sudanes pipol

  • @MrFox-ij3qp
    @MrFox-ij3qp 3 роки тому +60

    BRICS: vem tranquilo sem pressão, nunca mais fala do meu pai

    • @leonardos.b3111
      @leonardos.b3111 3 роки тому +2

      Kkkk não entedi a referencia Direito

    • @Marcosbr007
      @Marcosbr007 3 роки тому +1

      @@leonardos.b3111 eu tbm não kk

    • @calebemotta8107
      @calebemotta8107 3 роки тому +2

      @@Marcosbr007 ua-cam.com/video/lyFINGUGutE/v-deo.html

    • @sifakacoroado
      @sifakacoroado 2 роки тому +5

      kkkk eu entendi

    • @D0pamine.3091
      @D0pamine.3091 2 роки тому +1

      @ファビオ tem mais de uma musica tocando, qual voce se refere?

  • @KMizha
    @KMizha 3 роки тому +86

    Only in Dreams, in a real fight no one will be the winner. 😅

    • @yipengguo2732
      @yipengguo2732 2 роки тому +7

      WW3 may cause casualties that larger than all wars in history combined.

  • @tescomealdeals4613
    @tescomealdeals4613 3 роки тому +23

    I like how Germany became the leader of NATO when the invasion of Russia started (as seen by the color change). I think the game was telling us something...

    • @hamper6511
      @hamper6511 2 роки тому

      They're the best after deciphering the tactics of general winter

  • @galileofrank5779
    @galileofrank5779 3 роки тому +15

    That was awesome! the casualty counter and stat bars were really helpful in understanding the situation. The only thing I'd want to see added would be a description of what equipment was used in each offensive, i.e. was a lot of artillery used in one place to destroy tank divisions, where was the airpower concentrated, etc

  • @acommunistwithinternet9927
    @acommunistwithinternet9927 3 роки тому +20

    Pakistan:*joins BRICS*
    Indian subcontinent: Sab maroge hahahaha

    • @shashwatsinha2704
      @shashwatsinha2704 3 роки тому +1

      Kaise?

    • @rjkkk234
      @rjkkk234 Рік тому

      Brasil , Índia e Paquistão não entraria na guerra :rcs apenás

  • @nord1544
    @nord1544 2 роки тому +10

    Britain and US: "I think we're lost"
    Germany and France: "Let us show you the way"

  • @user-kr2uv2tr7b
    @user-kr2uv2tr7b 3 роки тому +14

    Real war between Russia and USA - 24 min, while missiles flying.

    • @Maxim_Miroshnichenko
      @Maxim_Miroshnichenko 2 роки тому +2

      The first stroke is 10-15 minutes. If the ICBM location areas are not disabled, the second wave will take 20-25 minutes. Cruise missiles will arrive in an hour. 2 hours of nuclear war, about 2 weeks of torment of the survivors. The onset of nuclear winter. The end of human history.

  • @pesto0326
    @pesto0326 3 роки тому +34

    Lets just hope that when this actually happens, they will all agree to use no nukes.

    • @gioacchinomarimpietri4593
      @gioacchinomarimpietri4593 2 роки тому

      @Red Yeah, too bad Putin is now creating a mega escalation that could probably lead to WW3 and that he is alarming his nuclear defense systems,
      how beautiful life is

    • @jesterknight3837
      @jesterknight3837 Рік тому

      @Red oh boy

    • @helldronez
      @helldronez Рік тому

      like in command and conquer generals zero hour option lol, no nuke allowed

    • @TankswillRule
      @TankswillRule Рік тому

      I doubt russia has working nukes, they are probably rusted. They keep threating with nukes but for some reason nothing yet..

  • @dutchmapping1
    @dutchmapping1 3 роки тому +5

    Great video! High quality too!

  • @ronaldreagan6839
    @ronaldreagan6839 3 роки тому +24

    Switzerland: *joins the war*
    Everybody: Now this is an angle gets level threat

  • @brandonchdib5380
    @brandonchdib5380 3 роки тому

    Very well made my dude👍👍

  • @Kardia_of_Rhodes
    @Kardia_of_Rhodes 3 роки тому +28

    When the world's 2 largest air forces are from the same country

  • @Flyingkitty1234
    @Flyingkitty1234 3 роки тому +12

    Usa:I never tought I would loose fighting againest this country.
    Vietnam:how about fighting along beside me.
    Usa:yay I can do that.
    Vietnam:joins nato againest China.

  • @c4m207
    @c4m207 3 роки тому +9

    2:09
    Bricks : *hahahaaa get wrect nato*
    Nato : *Reverse Card*

  • @cliffh.3279
    @cliffh.3279 3 роки тому +16

    I’m surprised: it looks like the ai actually made good strategic decisions

  • @theewatchfuleyeseesyou
    @theewatchfuleyeseesyou 2 роки тому +55

    I am kind of impressed by the BRICS alliance. In Millenium Dawn even just Europe without US support is pretty OP compared to the rest of the world.

    • @aviox3664
      @aviox3664 Рік тому +6

      it's realistic

    • @NeoRageXYZ
      @NeoRageXYZ 9 місяців тому +2

      MD US is actually really weak compared to RL so...

  • @ayushweoooo7482
    @ayushweoooo7482 2 роки тому +5

    But brics has three of the world's most strongest army 😎😎

  • @pashauzan
    @pashauzan 3 роки тому +10

    I love how China struggled to invade Vietnam

  • @prabhatsphysics3158
    @prabhatsphysics3158 2 роки тому +73

    If india china combines their ground forces and reserve personnel then they have strenght more then the population of many europian countries combined...!

    • @riyashah7486
      @riyashah7486 2 роки тому +3

      CcP is stupid, should have been allly with India

    • @artos9406
      @artos9406 2 роки тому +4

      @@riyashah7486 India is smart, isn't allying with China

    • @rural8438
      @rural8438 2 роки тому +7

      Numbers aren’t everything. Sure, India and China have LARGE militaries, but they’re not as ADVANCED as, say, the US or France.

    • @itsfutureda
      @itsfutureda 2 роки тому

      да, но американская авиация делает БУМ

    • @vccv9785
      @vccv9785 2 роки тому +8

      @@rural8438 that's what people said about Germany vs USSR and here we are

  • @meanwhileinthemindofagoril1343
    @meanwhileinthemindofagoril1343 3 роки тому +6

    everyone: naval invasions
    china and india: *so do you like conga lines?*

  • @rural8438
    @rural8438 3 роки тому +4

    for anyone wondering, the music is called Hell March 1, this song's absolutely fire

  • @clementchan496
    @clementchan496 3 роки тому +54

    China vs EU
    I think it would be good

    • @taureon_
      @taureon_ 3 роки тому +1

      aren't both like too far away

    • @Arcaryon
      @Arcaryon 3 роки тому +17

      ​@@taureon_ Yes and no. In real life, that's the primary reason why the EU unlike the US, isn't too involved in South East Asia. Japan and South Korea are friendly and westernized in terms of the political foundation but the attention is rightly on Russia.
      The thing is; today, Russia and China cooperate because Russia wasn't integrated in the NATO when the chance was there ( you can read up on that on Wikipedia, it's an interesting story ) to counter the NATO but really, they are not in a position to risk a direct war - and NATO isn't interested in such a conflict either. Nukes made war too expensive and risky. So, if Chinese rockets will be stationed in Moscow, this scenario will make a lot more sense.
      If that happens, however, the EU members will also massively ramp up their military budget because the whole European population will be more supportive of these measures. For example; right now even meeting the 2% required by the membership treaty is an issue in Germany ( I am German ) because there hasn't been any need for a full-strength army in thirty years that politics were able to translate to the general public, the wars in the middle east didn't make for good press so to speak.
      If Russia and China were seen as an alliance ( and they are already practising manoeuvres together so no formal treaties exist, we can all take a wild guess at what that inclines ), this wouldn't be the case any more which is also why the rhetoric in concerning this part of geopolitics is changing in the EU and in the west in general. Another aspect is that the US simply inhibits direct enemy activity through its massive military. While I am not a supporter of Trump by any means ( just like his predecessors who had similar positions ) he is not wrong when he says that Americans are paying for the peace of the western world.
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacifism_in_Germany
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia%E2%80%93NATO_relations
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundeswehr#Cold_War_1955%E2%80%931990
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Russian_relations_since_1991

    • @dodgydave6179
      @dodgydave6179 3 роки тому +2

      @@Arcaryon Indeed. The only militaries in Europe that are pretty strong are Great Britain and France. Germany has so much potential with her massive amount of factories. She could rival the other 2 European military powers, and even surpass them.

    • @Arcaryon
      @Arcaryon 3 роки тому

      @@dodgydave6179 Again, all a question of the public sentiment for that one.

    • @dodgydave6179
      @dodgydave6179 3 роки тому +2

      @@Arcaryon To be honest, even though many people aren't happy that most of Europe depends on British, French and American (mostly American) defence, there really isn't anything wrong with that. No country with nukes are ever going to start a conflict. For the first time in history, we no longer need to pour huge amounts of money to our militaries and underfund all over sectors. We don't need a royal navy that rules the waves as the Brits used to do. We don't need an amazing war strategist who absolutely changes everything we know about war like Napoleon did with France. We don't need big armies, because there are no threats, or threats that are absolutely miniscule and can be solved with diplomacy. So that begs the question, why are countries like the US, Russia and UK spending huge amounts of money in their armies, yet there are no big threats. Why can't we be like countries such as Germany who barely spends anything in their army, and yet is extremely peaceful and has a foreign policy to use pacifism, instead of jumping into battle like the Americans do all the time. I also guess, that that is too, another public sentiment that most of us ask ourselves from time to time.

  • @SuperDinhnam
    @SuperDinhnam 3 роки тому +10

    Vietnam joins NATO , sound real enough, can't believe the AI made that decision.

    • @Stayingrocked
      @Stayingrocked 2 роки тому +1

      It does makes sense in today’s world

    • @antonioklaic4839
      @antonioklaic4839 2 роки тому +4

      Vietnam hates China and ironically has good relations with the US

    • @starbuckoof5219
      @starbuckoof5219 2 роки тому

      Us getting flashback

    • @antonioklaic4839
      @antonioklaic4839 2 роки тому

      @anonymous og yes but neither is the CCP
      They are literally damming rivers that go into your country

  • @Killerwale-hk4wy
    @Killerwale-hk4wy Рік тому +5

    A war where Pakistan, India and China are on the same side is truly a sight to be seen. Also, the moment China realises it will lose, they will probably ragequit with some nukes.

  • @bishtkunal10
    @bishtkunal10 2 роки тому +29

    I dont know what parameters are used in this AI, but considering the sheer military size of Russia, China and India combined with allies it will beat NATO any day, not to mention they are also technologically advanced now, it's not 1945 anymore.

    • @gamersarena4196
      @gamersarena4196 2 роки тому +2

      Typical Western fantasies...

    • @itsfutureda
      @itsfutureda 2 роки тому +12

      no lmao

    • @vixinitydbz
      @vixinitydbz 2 роки тому

      no lmao, chinese planes are literally american ripoffs from the 90's

    • @softdrink-0
      @softdrink-0 2 роки тому

      @@itsfutureda bro I hate China but he’s right. India and China hold like 30% of the world population lmao

    • @evankirkpatrick8741
      @evankirkpatrick8741 2 роки тому +3

      Russia’s military might has waned significantly, and China has never been tested in battle before, as well as being poorly trained. India’s army is experienced but is behind the rest of the world in technology. Brazil and South Africa have very little to offer except as bases for the larger powers to operate out of.

  • @vitorsoriano5440
    @vitorsoriano5440 3 роки тому +48

    5:03 last stand in my city in mato grosso brazil

  • @mrgreenfr6216
    @mrgreenfr6216 3 роки тому +13

    I love the song! It give some sort of Panthera vibe!

    • @baltasarjimenez2091
      @baltasarjimenez2091 3 роки тому +2

      It's "Hell March" by Frank Klepacki, from Red Alert 1; remixed versions were included in Red Alert 2 and 3

  • @Avatar_Hoodie
    @Avatar_Hoodie 2 роки тому

    these are cool keep doing these plz

  • @rhavenovoidderris4109
    @rhavenovoidderris4109 3 роки тому +9

    I like how the phillipines and the other countries is like just there, popcorn in hand watching things go down hill for their northern neighbour..

  • @baogaming4430
    @baogaming4430 3 роки тому +10

    China:haha Vietnam is very weak so it is easy to hit
    Vietnam: Let's try
    China: Oh nooooooo

  • @ThatCzechGuy
    @ThatCzechGuy 2 роки тому +5

    The fact that Czechia just creates more troops fascinates me

  • @LordGamington1
    @LordGamington1 Рік тому +2

    The disparity in air and sea power would prove decisive in a conflict like this. What a fun watch

  • @christianalonzo650
    @christianalonzo650 3 роки тому +35

    Why did the faction color change

    • @GameWatcher545
      @GameWatcher545  3 роки тому +32

      Normally that happens when faction leader falls, or loses leadership.

    • @Sebastian-hc8rj
      @Sebastian-hc8rj 3 роки тому +7

      @@GameWatcher545 which nato nation is strong and That wierd type of Brown?

    • @toddhoward7649
      @toddhoward7649 3 роки тому

      @@Sebastian-hc8rj india

    • @Sebastian-hc8rj
      @Sebastian-hc8rj 3 роки тому +1

      @@toddhoward7649 India is in Brics

    • @toddhoward7649
      @toddhoward7649 3 роки тому +1

      @@Sebastian-hc8rj my bad wrong faction

  • @ngocanhnguyenho6788
    @ngocanhnguyenho6788 3 роки тому +17

    If the map is modern day mod map, BRICS will beat NATO easily. In 1936, NATO have much bigger IC, but in 2020, China India and Russia are too big to beat with enormous IC and Manpower.

    • @raghurajan336
      @raghurajan336 2 роки тому +1

      AGREED

    • @biswaskamal9011
      @biswaskamal9011 2 роки тому +1

      Right 👍👍

    • @itsfutureda
      @itsfutureda 2 роки тому +2

      легко говорить, но мы не знаем реальные силы БРИКС. хватит заниматься дерьмовым патриотизмом

    • @vixinitydbz
      @vixinitydbz 2 роки тому

      no lmao, chinese planes are literally american ripoffs from the 90's

    • @beaver2527
      @beaver2527 2 роки тому +1

      Neither of the groups existed in 1936. Also, the UK owned India and France had a colonial empire, not to mention that China was fragmented.

  • @Marcosbdk
    @Marcosbdk 3 роки тому +44

    with the entire population of Brics, just Brazil, russia, india, and china, it would already be several times greater than the number of Nato soldiers

    • @ashutoshhiremath720
      @ashutoshhiremath720 2 роки тому +17

      But not all of them are battle worthy nor is it possible to call upon and equip such a large manforce, it takes time and in that time we lose valuable resources and soldiers

    • @itsfutureda
      @itsfutureda 2 роки тому +10

      ага, а оружие и обучение где взять? а самое главное как спастись от авиации и ракет?)

    • @Marcosbdk
      @Marcosbdk 2 роки тому

      @@itsfutureda 🤷🏻‍♀️ xaxax

    • @vvdbj8569
      @vvdbj8569 2 роки тому +3

      lmao maybe wth ppl but the army is different as u can see in Ukraine war

    • @kushagrasingh4157
      @kushagrasingh4157 2 роки тому +6

      @French& Scottish bro they have best air defence system you could defeat the army but never people the people of India ,china and Russia are too nationalist

  • @trith72
    @trith72 2 роки тому +3

    That air force count says it all, control the skies and you control the ground below it as well.

  • @ItsMeDannyBoyz
    @ItsMeDannyBoyz 3 роки тому +4

    man command and conquer music is so good

  • @TheresNoPrivacy
    @TheresNoPrivacy 3 роки тому +5

    The irony is that Im watching this while in history class and we are learning about ww2

  • @carlossilvashow3321
    @carlossilvashow3321 3 роки тому +12

    Brasil, Amazônia = Novo vietnã
    English, Amazonia???=New vietnam

  • @dacarioustj7785
    @dacarioustj7785 3 роки тому +1

    Oh this is fantastic.

  • @evanbrock6335
    @evanbrock6335 3 роки тому +7

    In reality though if this actually happened India would have to be forced to join the Brics in the war.

  • @space-ghost8186
    @space-ghost8186 2 роки тому +14

    I think it would be much more bloody invade Brazil, Nato would never invade China and Russia and India at same time.

  • @DerpyUniverse
    @DerpyUniverse Рік тому +2

    That polish encirclement is likely what lost the war for BRICS, it’s hard to recover from such a defeat. 700 thousand men

  • @vriskamoder
    @vriskamoder 3 роки тому +1

    What mods do you use for the time and stats?

  • @gamingwolf1387
    @gamingwolf1387 3 роки тому +8

    I bet Germany was happy as soon as they Declared war on BRICS XD

    • @rjkkk234
      @rjkkk234 Рік тому

      Brics não querem argentina

  • @Namelesswhirl
    @Namelesswhirl 3 роки тому +5

    "We've always been at war with East Asia."

    • @ivanahr26
      @ivanahr26 3 роки тому +2

      Strong and peaceful, wise and brave
      Fighting the fight for the whole world to save
      We the people will ceaselessly strive
      To keep our great revolution alive
      Unfurl the banners, look at the screen
      Never before has such glory been seen
      Oceania
      Oceania
      Oceania
      'Tis for thee
      Every deed, every thought 'tis for thee
      Every deed, every thought 'tis for thee

  • @Geenoi
    @Geenoi 3 роки тому +2

    Switzerland: Oh this popcorn is extra buttery.

  • @Cihan9.
    @Cihan9. 3 роки тому +1

    Can you show participation ratios ? And countries kills and casulties numbers?

  • @shashwatsingh6142
    @shashwatsingh6142 2 роки тому +36

    5:30 Russia and India surrendering and BRICK lose the war, nice joke 😂😂 "You can't conclute the result without the actual war"

    • @Aboleo80
      @Aboleo80 2 роки тому +15

      It's a game Sanjit, relax

    • @homeone4237
      @homeone4237 2 роки тому

      india would get wiped the fuck out by nato

    • @IndiaBallYT
      @IndiaBallYT 2 роки тому

      @@Aboleo80 Bruh, even Russia,India and China can eliminate NATO and Russia,India and China are 1.5x stronger then NATO and if Brazil and south africa join so BRICS has to win, RIP LOGICS

    • @armanelchapo9509
      @armanelchapo9509 11 місяців тому

      @@Aboleo80its a whole Asia unites and eats nato. Relax

  • @hermes112
    @hermes112 3 роки тому +6

    I can already tell who won the war with the like/dislike ratio xD

  • @Humbajiga
    @Humbajiga 2 роки тому +3

    America: alr guys who here has experience fighting russia
    Poland, France and Germany: my time has come

  • @andrewson5330
    @andrewson5330 3 роки тому

    Hey. How do you make games showcase with the flags?

  • @NormalChannel95
    @NormalChannel95 3 роки тому +29

    1:43 If not for Vietnam, Warsaw probably would've fallen.

  • @Halal_Butcher
    @Halal_Butcher 3 роки тому +7

    Chinese started losing the war when they saw some cute anime girls roll up to the battle field with some MG-42 xD

  • @GauravSuryawanshi
    @GauravSuryawanshi 2 роки тому

    what did you do to calculate the armour airforce and all?

  • @arsenallee9100
    @arsenallee9100 3 роки тому +2

    Thanks for the shoutout 😃

  • @TheBluetwo26
    @TheBluetwo26 3 роки тому +4

    Thought Brics had it when 23 new nations joined.

  • @dawixon1
    @dawixon1 2 роки тому +3

    There is only one question left, why in the end Kalingrad does not belong to Poland. that would be a beautiful ending

  • @MegaPlayerXxX
    @MegaPlayerXxX 3 роки тому +1

    I doubt it would go like that, but we're talking about two AIs in a videogame. XD

  • @mrworldwide7387
    @mrworldwide7387 2 роки тому

    What mods did you use to create the factions ?

  • @SUPABROS
    @SUPABROS 2 роки тому +5

    since brick has Russia China and India it would make a very strong military alliance honestly

    • @homeone4237
      @homeone4237 2 роки тому

      not really

    • @ZuZu66667
      @ZuZu66667 Рік тому

      Yeah, I doubt Europeans will fight against them. It’s not like the past, people want comfort.

    • @b3ygghsas
      @b3ygghsas Рік тому

      Good thing it will never become a military alliance

  • @thanhtc1988
    @thanhtc1988 3 роки тому +6

    Dang,Vietnam still do very well in a stimulation game.

    • @bapkien4476
      @bapkien4476 2 роки тому +1

      Chúng ta đã có thể lấy lại được lãnh thổ của tộc bách việt =)))

  • @justaguy33333
    @justaguy33333 Рік тому +2

    -Vietnam joins nato
    -USA: what

  • @kylogamermemes3951
    @kylogamermemes3951 3 роки тому

    What is the mod to see the casualties?

  • @FRFFW
    @FRFFW 3 роки тому +12

    thailand exactly eat some sea food with vietnam
    "why germany is everywhere?!"

  • @aaronsanceda4085
    @aaronsanceda4085 3 роки тому +3

    Me looking at construction site: Ah zyes...
    *B* *R* *I* *C* *S*

  • @iosayt4288
    @iosayt4288 2 роки тому

    What is the marching ”chant” in the beginning called?

  • @lengskeng1072
    @lengskeng1072 3 роки тому

    Now, this is epic

  • @analytik_playz4360
    @analytik_playz4360 2 роки тому +15

    I can't understand how NATO was able to send troops in Vietnam , Brasil ,Middle East and India in huge numbers and was still able to have a big force in Russia and I think there I also a thing called "winter". It's very difficult to defeat the middle east because of it's geography . It's impossible for the NATO troops to conquer Russia , Middle East and India.I think in real life it would be a BRICS win.

    • @Matt_Alaric
      @Matt_Alaric 2 роки тому +2

      The middle east has been an easy victory for any modern military for at least a century.

    • @itsfutureda
      @itsfutureda 2 роки тому +2

      да да, невозможно.. это игра дурачок, в реальном мире Индия союзник США и враг Китая

    • @aimxdy8680
      @aimxdy8680 2 роки тому +1

      NATO has air superiority and superior in navy which could easily be a victory

    • @saheb-jg9nj
      @saheb-jg9nj 2 роки тому

      @@aimxdy8680 no

    • @petercn8989
      @petercn8989 2 роки тому

      @@aimxdy8680 Navy can’t do shit in land battle, if them get too close to land them will be strike by long range Missile, as for air superiority’s, only USA have little advantage in tech, but it wasn’t that big ,when war break out, China, Russia and India combine resource, technology and manpower, them can mass produce aircraft, especially china have showed the world how fast them can make stuffs.

  • @denizayaz2675
    @denizayaz2675 3 роки тому +5

    During The NATO Meeting
    Members: We are going invade Rusi...
    Germany: Say no more

    • @homeone4237
      @homeone4237 2 роки тому

      i just know german generals were rubbing their hands together. unlimited oil to invade Russia... talk about round two.

    • @armanelchapo9509
      @armanelchapo9509 11 місяців тому

      Stalin join chat

  • @warlover9696
    @warlover9696 2 роки тому

    I want to do this map timelapse thing 🤔. How do you do it?

  • @jk8557
    @jk8557 2 роки тому

    Is that statistics info windows some mod?

  • @dudemevill1699
    @dudemevill1699 2 роки тому +4

    I find it hard to believe that NATO can conquer Russia when they have India and China in their side.

  • @cursedhfy3558
    @cursedhfy3558 2 роки тому +4

    Honestly there was never a chance NATO would lose this war it was just a matter of how quickly it would happen and how costly it would be.

    • @emmano6340
      @emmano6340 2 роки тому

      Considering that BRICS is Brazil, Russia, India, China & South Africa.
      And NATO is basically US + EU, a conflict between those blocs would literally mean the end of the world.

    • @cursedhfy3558
      @cursedhfy3558 2 роки тому +1

      @@emmano6340 Honestly even of nobody dropped the nukes, the devastation would be unfathomable.

    • @emmano6340
      @emmano6340 2 роки тому

      @@cursedhfy3558 Exactly

  • @KaiserStormTracking
    @KaiserStormTracking 3 роки тому

    did you let the game autorun while you just watched and filmed?

  • @Mowraq
    @Mowraq 3 роки тому

    An ahistorical HoI where everything goes as monarchist as possible in the settings.

  • @rubensalinas5820
    @rubensalinas5820 3 роки тому +19

    In real life Nato is Nothing without the USA support.

    • @The_WhiteSilver
      @The_WhiteSilver Рік тому +1

      They still could wipe out Russia in a 1v1

    • @weeder3154
      @weeder3154 Рік тому

      Actually german destek alot too

    • @armanelchapo9509
      @armanelchapo9509 11 місяців тому

      @@The_WhiteSilverlmao whole Asia unites they can wipe out nato and us

    • @The_WhiteSilver
      @The_WhiteSilver 11 місяців тому

      @@armanelchapo9509 How exactly would they do that? You have yet to explain.

    • @armanelchapo9509
      @armanelchapo9509 11 місяців тому

      @@The_WhiteSilver lmao Russia china India japan and South Korea…. Japan best technology in world combined with most and best manpower and tanks

  • @desconhecido3110
    @desconhecido3110 2 роки тому +24

    Caso um confronto é assim aconteça na vida real, Acho que não haverá mundo depois de disso

  • @removalldamme
    @removalldamme 2 місяці тому

    Wait how did you make only the ai play the game, did use a mod??

  • @2x477
    @2x477 3 роки тому +1

    What mods are you using to blend out GUI, but keeping the time?
    And how are you adding these statistics?
    Great Video