Debunking Propaganda against Shripaada Madhvacharya
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 жов 2024
- Harihi Om.
This video is a response to trolls who have abused Vaishnava Dharma and Shripaada Madhvacharya, with false allegations.
A Video on the Pancharaatra Philosophy: • Video
A Blog Post: blog.jbdeets.o...
A Video on the Position of Shri Shiva as per Vaishnavism: • [Old Video, Read Descr...
The opponent's video: • कलियुग का दक्ष माध्वाच...
An Instagram Post on 'Vaayu Jeevottama': / cix43cmvsrb
A detailed Quora answer: quora.com/What...
It is clear that the opponent is either dishonest, hasn't verified any facts before blindly publishing them or is ignorant. This video intends to refute such allegations against great philosophers.
Shri Krshnaarpanamastu.
Keep it up 💯 man ,you are gonna going to vaikuntha
हरे कृष्ण ! अपने चरणों मे मेरा बारम्बार दंडवत स्वीकार करे।
मैं नही जानता था श्री पाद रामानुजाचार्य को श्रीपाद मध्वाचार्य को । लेकिन जब मैंने गौड़ीय वैष्णवो के श्रीमुख से श्रीपाद मध्वाचार्य की दिव्य लीला का श्रवण किया तभी मेरा हृदय आनंदित हो गया था।
जय श्रील प्रभुपाद,
श्रीपाद मध्वाचार्य जी की जय।
Based posting 💯 I pity the poor souls who are being misguided by these Hari drohis to hate Bhagwatpāda Madhva based on nothing but lies. May Madhvāntargata Sri Gopala Krishna grant them wisdom.
मैं बारम्बार आपके चरणों मे दंडवत करता हूं जो आप अपने इस ज्ञान रूपी भक्ति रूपी अमृत से हमे कृतार्थ कर रहे।
Bro, you are doing great service to Jagadguru Shri Madhvacharya. All the vaishnavas are with you.. All the best..
Taittiriya Upanishad 1.1.1:
May the sun give us auspiciousness! May Varuṇa give us auspiciousness! May Aryamā give us auspiciousness! May Indra and Bṛhaspati give us auspiciousness! May Viṣṇu, endowed with great strides, give us auspiciousness! I offer respects to the Vedas. *O Vāyu, I offer respects to you. You are directly Brahman. I will call you direct Brahman.* I will speak proper words and the truth. Protect me and protect the speaker. Protect me and protect the speaker. Peace, peace, peace.
Excerpt from the Commentary of Ranga Ramanuja Muni:
I offer respects to Vāyu, who reveals the syllables of the Vedas. *Since Vāyu gives life to beings in the universe and is spread everywhere, though he is actually different from Brahman, respects are offered to Vāyu as being directly Brahman*.
Now Taittiriya Upanishad along with its commentary by By Ranga Ramanuja Muni will be declared to be Pakhanda by some lunatic asylum escapees 😌
Bhadrankarne bhisrunuyama devaha...
Hare Krishna 🙏
Every single Religious Channel on internet thinks they are superior then Previous Aacharyas .
And dont digest phylosophical differences .
appreciated your content...
HARI BOOL ❤
They have no problem with Sadhguru who created lord shiva image as a mountain man random yogi but they have problems with people worshipping vishnu
Yaa ,,, I am really surprised 😂😂
Why these people don't make their voice against that rascal sadh guru
He Is spreading misconception among many innocent youths.
Shiva as an individual, who did appear in the mountains, as a yogi.
Even,, no body knows that, from where he quotes these sentences 😂😂🤦
Actually,,, we can say that sadh guru is illiterate in the sect of spiritualism.
He doesn't know to read Sanskrit.
He has not studied any scriptures.
Even he has not studied even shrimad bhagvad geeta 😂😂.
But still he is preaching to many people as a so called guru with his own superstitious individual opinions.😂
And the most funny thing is that,,, he considers himself as a realised or liberated individual.
He states that, he is never going to take any birth again,,,because he has liberated from the cycle of birth and death.😂😂ooh my god 🤦
@@keshavkumarjha5763sadhuguru used to give discourse on krishna katha and even after the discourse he said I have not read the Gita or the Vedas 🤣🤣🤣
Based. Hari sarvottama vayu jivottama
Great work Sir, please continue your good work...
Hare Krishna 🙏🙏
Sripada Madhvacharya ji ki Jai Jai Jai 🙏🙏🙏🙏
This video is 100 percent accurate one
Awesome video bro ..
All the best make more videos of this type n educate ppl 🙏🙏🙏
Hari sarvottam Vaayu jeevotham
Aapne Last ekdam sahi kaha Sab Samparadaya aur philosophies mahan Aacharya aur Mahan Vedant Scholar Gurus se aaye hai chahe weh Shaiv ho Vaishnav sabhi unke diye hue Path pr chal rahe hai kisi dusre aachryo galii Dene se phele ya even Denese bhi kuch nahi hotaa SB samparadaya sanatan dhram mai hai sirf ek hi sach baki sb zhuut yeh toh fir pagalpana hai sb apne apne raste chal rahe hai
🙏🙏🙇🏽♀️keep going prabhu ji. This is awesome.
Hare Krishna 🙏
Your knowledge of scripture is commendable. You keep gaining more knowledge because there is no end to know.
I have read all philosophies - The best Pramana to find truth are called Prasthana Traya - Upanishads, Brahma Sutras and Bhagavad Gita
Hare Kṛṣṇa 🙏
Now Jiva Cant become brahman as per Brahma Sutras- Om Jagat Vyapaara Varjam Om
The most funny part about Advaits they don't accept any scripture which says lord Vishnu is superior and they claim they are ready for sastarth😂😂 before doing sastarth they must accept all sastra from same writter.we accept shiv puran in reference of padam puran when lord shiva talked with Mata parvati we can understand the purpose of shiv puran but there is no reference to discredit any vaishnav purans so people who are blaspheming the great acharyas they must accept all the scriptures written by ved vyas before debate.
Some fake Advaitins and fake Shaivas say Ramanuja and Madhva as Wrong (And Abrahamic).
Harihi Om.
True. There is no basis for their claims. We shall cover this in a future video perhaps.
For vaishnavas- vishnu is supreme.
For shaivas - shiva is supreme.
For shaktas- durga is supreme.
So you follow your belifs without degrading other's.
Haraye Namaha.
That's exactly what we are saying - Why are the slanderers hell bent on abusing our Aachaaryas and philosophy?
@@bhaktideets bro the reason for this are vaishnavas especially iskcon itself because
Whensomeone says wrong about shiv if he is from iskcon they start defending him
Some acharyas also say that Shiv bhakts suffers misery
Hope you understand
@@insanegamermanav9236
And also dont forget shaivacharyas like shrikanta, arulanandi shaivacharyars who said vaishnavas should be slaughtered and vaishnavism is demonism
@insanegamermanav9236 Haraye Namaha.
Those are just excuses. If some fanatics do so, then they cannot abuse Aachaaryas or start condemning the Vaishnava philosophy. Fanatics shall exist in all sampradaayas. That is nothing new.
@@insanegamermanav9236 there is no wrong in saying shiva is a manas tattva devta according to subaala upanishad 5th khand and vaishnavas do special pooja for shiva.....
education is very important
Amazing video brother, but I have a suggestion... Change BGM... Its String channel's BMG, and this video can be easily banned by UA-cam on copyright grounds...
Harihi Om.
Thanks.
We do have plans to use another background music, since this one is sometimes too loud. However, there's no issue with copyrights, since it is permitted to be used on UA-cam, by the owner of the audio track.
@@bhaktideets ya sometimes it's too loud
@@bhaktideets hare Krsna prabhuji 🙏
Prabhuji we know Sri Krsna/Visnu is parabrahma then, I read this thing in Sri Narad pancratra that Sri Maha Visnu is 1/16th amsa of Sri Krsna. How do we interpret it?
Also what do you think about "Krsnastu bhagwan swayam"?
Hare Krsna🙏
Sri Krsnaarpanamastu 🙏
Very neat explanation . One suggestion , please make the background volume low since it can be bit overwhelming while grasping the facts explained.
Harihi Om.
Yes, it has been fixed in our latest videos.
Hare Krishna prabhuji.
You are doing a fantastic work by giving proofs from bonafide scriptures.
Prabhuji I have one query. Prabhuji why is it so that Vaisnava and shivite have a difference in opinion. One says Lord Vishnu is supreme while other says lord Shiva is ....All of our acharyas whether in vaisnava or in Shaiva tradition know the truth. Then why did they gave difficult opinion. Some say that lord shiva is supreme. Some say lord Vishnu is supreme. Prabhuji people querrel a lot on these topics and many a time politics also come into play. They use offensive words many a times and do aparadha. Why is all these happening.
Hare Krishna prabhuji
Dandwat pranam
16:15 well said brother. Salute you 🙏
HARI SARVATTOM 🔥🔥🔥
!! HARI SARVOTTAMA !!
!! VAYU JIVOTTAMA !!
Hari Sarvottama Vayu jeevottam !!!
Shriman Naarayana.🙏🙏
Shame on such ignorant people, who does make such a false claim against our great acharyas like bhagwan madhavachary...
These people are on the peak of unadulterated materialism,,
These people are just illiterate and away from shastras ...
Fact will be always fact.
Vaishnavism is the largest and widely accepted philosophy of Hinduism in whole world,
Every body does know this fact.
I am not a shiv drohi but still I believe in facts ...
The most popular sects of vedant is done by vaishnavas .
Even there is no any comparison of vaishnav with any other sect of Hinduism..
Most of people don't know even any great acharya belong to shaivism or shaktism.
But we all know the great vaishnav acharyas.
Bhagwan Ramanujachary.
Bhagwan madhavachary.
Bhagwan Ramanandachary .
Bhagwan nimbarkachary.
Bhagwan vallabhacharya.
Yugal swaroop shriman chaitnya mahaprabhu.
Vaishnav were the first who did oppose the non dualism or maya baad of bhagvad paad adi Shankaracharya...
Vaishnav acharya had even glorified and elaborated the vedant ..
Vishthtadvait by Ramanujachary.
Sudha advait by vallabhacharya.
Dwait by madhavachary
bheda abhed by nimbarkachary.
Achintya bheda bhed by chaitnya mahaprabhu..
There is no any comparison of vaishnav with any other sec.
Term vishnu is mentioned more the shiva in our Vedas.
In purush shukt - shriman naarayan is glorified - the lord whose consorts are laxmi and shree.
In upnishad - most of upnishad are vaishnav.
Tripad vibhooti maha naryano upnishad.
Gopal utar taypniyo upnishad.
Gopal purab tapniyo upnishad.
Ramo upnishad.
Krishinop upnishad.
Sitop upnishad.
Radhopnishad.
Nrisimho upnishad..
And many more.
Only few upnishd belongs to shaivism or shaktism,,,and those are not so much popular...and actually they are later incorporated
In puranas .
The most popular , acceptable and most glorified puran by great acharyas is our shrimad bhagwatam.
The puran over which ,,, most of commentaries are written is our shrimad bhagwatam.
Like shree dhari teeka.
Like bhrihad vaishnav totni.
Laghu vaishnav totni.
By vishwa naath chakraborty thakur.
Even contemporary scholar advaitis like madhusudan Saraswati 😂😂.
Swami akhanda Saraswati...
And the second most popular puran is vishnu puran.
Shreedhari teeka is still available.
There is no any commentry over shiv puran or ling Puran.😂😂not a single commentry ( Authentic)..
In Prasthan trayi - only vaishnav acharyas have done bhasyam in addition to Shankaracharya.
On brahmn sutra - most brief explanation is shree vashyam done by our vital force beloved bhagwan Ramanujachary..
And geeta is itself a vaishnav granth 😂😂.
Geeta is the most popular religious and widely accepted, distributed granth in whole world 🌎.
In puranas - the king of purana is bhagwatam .
Now now most of puranas are vaishnav.
On each avtaar of pramatma shriman naarayan,,, there is one puran .
Like - matsya Puran.
Varah puran.
Kurm puran.
Vaman puran..
😂😂And in these all above puran shriman naarayan is the root of universes.
Now king puranas are - bhagwat and Vishnu Puran.
Brahmand puran is also vaishnav puran because - bhagwan shri krishn Chandr is considered as brahmn in this puran.
Brahm vaivart puran is the most vaishnav oriented puran.😂😂😂.
In Agni Puran - although shriman naarayan is the cause of Brahma and shiva...
Narad puran is also a vaishnav oriented puran.
Padm puran is one of the prominent puran of Vaishnavism...
Skand Puran also deals with the vaishnav khand .
80 % of puranas are vaishnav 😂😂.
There is only 2 puranas for shaivism - shiv puran and ling Puran.
In which shiv puran is most contradicted.
Now in history - every body know about ramayan and maha Bharat.
😂😂 Which are totally vaishnav. Oriented.
Shriman Naarayana 🙏🙏
This fact is clearly stated in Mahabharata's Shanti Parva by none other than Bhagwan Krishna (Bhagwan Vishnu) Himself:
O Partha! Therefore, if Maheshvara, the god of the gods, is worshipped, that is the same thing as the lord god, Narayana, being worshipped. O descendant of the Pandu lineage! I am the atman of all the worlds. Therefore, I single-mindedly worship Rudra as my own self. If Ishana Shiva, the granter of boons, is not worshipped, then I think of that as my own self not being worshipped. The worlds follow my ordinances. Those ordinances must be honoured and I also honour them. A person who knows him, knows me. A person who knows me, knows him. O Kounteya! Rudra and Narayana possess a single essence, although they divide themselves into two, pervade people and make them engage in all the acts.
Source : BORI CE Mahabharata Santi Parva Moksha Dharma Parva ch 1656(328)
Hari-Hara ke aise bohot se references hai
Aur bohot se puraan mai like Padma puran Vishnu Puran Mahabharata parva aur bohot jagah pe Bhagwaan shiv ki stuti mahima hai.
Maybe Vaishnav perspective se iska meaning alag ho
PR Bhagwaan shiv keliye alag seperate puraanas hona shiv puraan ling puraan skand puraan markandeya aur shiv samhita shiv geeta yeh SB hona galat hai kya jinme bhagwaan shiv ki mahima ishwrta hai usko aise hasna toh barabar nahi hai na(contradiction yeh woh Bhai dusroo ki shraddha bhakti Aisa kyu kehna)
Bhagwaan Skand dwara Skand puraan mai toh jaise nadiyo mai ganga sresht hoti hai waise hi purano mai sresht skand puraan hai aise likha hai
Aur sabhi purano ko hame pure shraddha se manana chahiye aise bhi likha hai
Jaise achyuta deets Bhai ne bhi kaha hai ki sb sampradaya apne parampara sampradaya aur manyatao se chal raha hai pr aise shaiv puraano ka mazak udana yeh asahniy hai🙏
Maheshwaray sarveshwaray vishweshwaray digambararay namah shivay 🙏
@@manmathgodre5360 I am not making fun of shiv puran.
I am really very sorry,, if any how my statement hurts you.🙏🙏🙏.
Actually I have read shiv puran, even more than shrimad bhagwatam.
My grandmother had gifted her shiv puran to me .
I look that _ shiv puran non different from uma maheshwar.
But still fact will be fact.
Shrimad bhagwatam is only one puran ,,, which is glorified in other 4 purans
1 skand Puran.
2 padm puran.
3 narad puran.
4 garur puran.
Now the puran over which most of great scholar and realised individuals have done their commentry is only shrimad bhagwatam.
1 shree dhar Swami ( Puri Shankaracharya).
2 roop goswami, jeev goswami.
3 vishwa naath chakraborty.
4 madhusudan Saraswati.
You can readily observe that even great acharyas of advait vedant like madhusudan Saraswati the writer of advait siddhi were crazy about only shrimad bhagwatam.
In the commentry over shrimad bhagwat,,, madhusudan Saraswati
Wrote _ krishnat param Kim api tattava maham na jaane.
I don't know any other tattva greater than shree krishn Chandr.
The most popular commentry is done by shreedhar Swami ( advaiti).
You can readily observe the authenticity or popularity of shrimad bhagwatam among not only vaishnav,for advaitis too.
And now the most important thing is that...
Do you know what is the 4th Prasthan????
Shrimad bhagwatam is considered as 4 th prashthan.
Garur puran states that ,,,it is the commentry of vedanta.
Then nothing lefts to say .
Shrimad bhagwatam is final conclusion of vedanta.
Madhusudan Saraswati also admits that _ nrityati vedant siddhant.
And we all know that there is no any comparison of great vaishnav acharyas...
Even there is no any single acharya belong to shaivism or shaktism.
Then we have to follow these great acharya Only.
Because Vaishnavism is the true, most accepted. Most popular,most widely elaborated sect of Hinduism.
And it is the non deniable truth that.
Shriman Naarayana is the root cause of Brahma and shiva.
99 percent puranas deal with such content.
Although still I pay my salutation in the lotus feet of Parvati parmeshwar.
And bhagwati bhuvneshwari .
But the truth is,,,, Maha Vishnu ( shree krishn Chandr)is para brahmn paramatma.. ,,,Pradhan purushewar sarva lok Maheshwara..🙏🙏
@@manmathgodre5360 सच्चिदानंद रूपाय विश्वोत्पच्यादि हेतवे। तापत्रयविनाशाय श्री कृष्णाय वयं नुम:।।''
Jai shree krishn 🙏❤️
Congratulations for 100 subscribers
Harihi Om.
Thanks a lot. 🙏
One sided biased claimed for satisfy fake interpretations of mdhwachrya aaj ke time me hota toh totally exposed hojta.
Haraye Namaha.
Source? Trust me, vro! Meanwhile, even several other opponents of Madhvacharya tried "exposing" him and failed miserably, due to which other scholars have even appreciated him several times, both recent and ancient.
@@bhaktideets yes according to you people everyone is failed against your madhwa Abrahmic achrya because he came from Vishnu loka 🤣🤣
Haraye Namaha.
Source? Again, trust me vro!! 😩😭😂🤣
@@bhaktideets source folktales of regarding madhwa as vayu awtar 🤡🤡
Haraye Namaha.
Far better than your stories of Shaiva Rshis being superior to Shri Vishnu Himself or all 24 avataaras of His being killed by Shri Rudra!
What kind of video was that.Okay that person does not agree with the philosophy of Sri Anandateerthartha Bhagavatpadaru but why such kind of disrespect towards our Guru.We have differences with Advaitains and other philosophers but we never had any "dwesha" bhavane towards anyone.
Hare Krishna 🙏pls make a video on Gandabherunda Shri Hari
Harihi Om.
Assuming that you are referring to the Narasimha-Sharabha incident, there was no involvement of Gandaberunda here, but from a Vaishnava point of view, it was Shri Narasimha who killed the Sharabha form of Shri Shiva. This whole incident is a philosophical difference of different sampradaayas, but fanatics cannot respect different views. So, we do have plans to make a video on it next year, in early 2023.
@@bhaktideets I'm asking because I want to know if Gandabherunda scene really happened or not ? I want to know the Vaishnava opinion on Gandabherunda
Harihi Om.
For now you can refer to this answer by one of our admins, on Quora: quora.com/Did-Lord-Narasimha-been-really-defeated-by-Lord-Shiva-please-answer-wisely-I-dont-want-a-fanatic-answer/answer/Venkatanaatha-Suta/
@@bhaktideets thank u . Hare Krishna
Brother i my grandfather also initiated in madhvacharya sampradaya now gaudiya and also a vaisnava and now my grandfather passed away and i am also intiated by my grandfather as guru but in my vilage there are lots of shaivas who claim shiva is prabrahma in Vedas and they show refrences please make a video on this
Harihi Om.
We've already covered a lot of these on our blog articles, but yes, we may make a few videos on these soon. Also, Shaivas will follow what the Shaiva Aagamas say and interpret the Vedas accordingly, just like we interpret them in accordance to the Vaishnava Aagamas. So, it's natural for them to have different opinions.
Please make a video on shaivas philosophy and aagmas is they are authentic also some vaishav of modern age told shiva and visnu is a same personality and Shiva is also prabrahma and shokol like this eko rudro daityo nasti i am confused
Harihi Om.
Sure, we will cover that in one of our live streams. Regarding ‘eko rudro dvitiyo naasti..’ it can be interpreted to refer to Shri Vishnu, as it’s repeated in the Naaraayana Upanishad. Refer to our blog article here: blog.jbdeets.org/narayana/
In our area there are lots of krishna devotees but they are not well known in shastras, if someone ask quotions they can't give answers plz make videos on shiva on Vedas there are some shaivitis give some shlokas from Vedas shiva is parabrahma . I need your help prabhuji can you give your whatsapp no
परा᳚त् परत॑रो ब्र॒ह्मा॒ त॒त्परा᳚त् पर॒तो ह॑रिः ।
त॒त्परा᳚त् पर॑तो ऽधी॒श॒स्तन्मे॒ मनः॑ शि॒वस॑ङ्क॒ल्पम॑स्तु ॥ 18 plz make an video
Why no videos are not coming
Haraye Namaha.
All our Admins are busy till the end of this month. We'll probably return soon.
@@bhaktideets
Thanks you your response.
Hare Krishna
Mujhe Madhva Sampraday aur philosophy k baremein Hindi or English mein lecture kisi channel mein mil sakte hai?
Harihi Om.
Unfortunately, there aren’t many, except just a project of Shri Sundar Madakshira. Most of the discourses are in Kannada.
According to their logic if you like Modiji it means you hate yogi ji..
We worship lord Hari it doesn't mean we hate lord shiva even their hero Sadhguru says Lord shiva is adiyogi as a guru so even their hero is saying same thing the problem is these people are just envious of lord Vishnu
Please give me Shiva dhyan mantra
Jai Jai Vaishnava Naam Yatha Sambhu🙏🙏🙏
Harihi Om.
It's available here: anandatirtha.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/shiva-dhyana-mantra/
It is in Sanskrit and South language, I want in English and it's meaning 😀
Harihi Om.
Oh, okay. Here's its transliteration in IAST:
dhyeyaḥ paṅcamukho rudraḥ sphaṭikāmalakāntimān |
vidyucchubhraasitarajaḥśyāmānyasyamukhānitu jaṭāvabaddhendukalaḥ priyāyuṅnāgabhūṣaṇaḥ ||
You can refer to this Instagram post for the translation: instagram.com/p/CahPvOMgclM/
Madhvacharya ji ka authentic biography jo ki English mein available ho book form mein mujhe Zara recommend karenge
Harihi Om.
It’s available here: srimadhvyasa.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/03-san-madhwavijaya-withenglishtranslation-27082016.pdf
@@bhaktideets Hare Krishna 😊🙏 Thanks 😊🙏
दर्शनानां प्रवृत्तत्वान्मन्दः आशङ्कते पुनः । अनादिकालतो वृत्ताः समया हि प्रवाहतः ॥
All philosophies have been existing since eternity . Sometimes , one becomes more popular or less popular . But none perishes -Shrpaada Madhvacharya , in Anuvyaakhyaana , Adhyaaya 2 , Paada 2
so every sampradaya has the right to follow the teachings of their gurus and who don't like it please don't follow it and don't make any false comments. the keyboard warriors should stop making illogical points.
Wanting such more videos
Hare krishna❤❤
What is your opinion on your gaudiya philosophy?
Haraye Namaha.
We disagree with it, as our Siddhaanta differs on many philosophical matters.
Hare Krishna ❤️
@@bhaktideets my questions is that- in vaisnism, there are many sampradaya with its own philosophy so, are all of them authentic and can they really grant us the vaikuntha dham, if someone is following a particular sampradaya. Just like- by following ramanandi sampradaya can we get saket dham , by following gaudiya sampradaya can we get golok dham.
@@bhaktideets hare Krishna but we accept panch bhed and 9 pramye of Sri vyast tirtha we are madhva gaudiya sampradaya
@@bhaktideetssome points may be different but maximum points same gaudiya sampradaya belongs to madhva sampradaya
@@shashankkaushik7870
!! HARI SARVOTTAMA !!
!! VAYU JEEVOTTAMA !!
gaudiya sampradaya follows achintya bhedabheda and does not put pancha mudras on their body.they only put tilak and neither they put black marks like angaar akshat in their forehead...so gaudiya differs from madhva sampradaya...
prabhu ji what is your views on iskcon please reply
Haraye Namaha.
Nothing specific. We have philosophical disagreements, but support them, as a Vaishnava sampradaaya.
So as per Prasthana Traya - Dvaita is correct..if you have issue I am ready for a debate
Haraye Namaha.
Why do you want to have a debate with us? For what? We ourselves are literally Dvaitins!
Haraye namah..not with you but with people who hate dvaita
Haraye Namaha.
No need. Such people only have a taamasika svabhaava. They won't change and it is just a waste of time to argue with them.
can you explain basavannas philosophy of shiva one true god
Harihi Om.
We are not Lingaayatas or Veerashaivas, so not the right people to consult. His philosophy was Veerashaivism, that considers Shri Shiva Brahman and the Supreme Being.
@@bhaktideets which sampradaya are you?
Harihi Om.
We are Maadhvas.
@@bhaktideets Origin?
@@bhaktideets ok, madhvas from udupi, Mantralaya, Sode.. etc
U included worshipping anya devatas so that u could takeover Kukke Subramanya, Anantheshwara, Chandramoulishwara, Kemminje Shanmukha Subrahmanya, Kateel Durga Parameshwari temples
While most of Vaishnava temples in Karnataka are under Sri Vaishnavas, all Shaiva, Subramanya, Durga temples in coastal Karnataka are under these Madhwas who are Vaishnavas
Harihi Om.
*when Vaishnavas don't worship other devatas*: Vaishnavas are paakhandis, Shiva drohis, Vaishnavas hate Shiva, etc.
*when Vaishnavas worship other devatas*: You want to take over Shaiva temples, vro!!
Either way, critics have a problem with anything done by us. Places like Kateel have pramaanas from the Shaastras like Matsya and Skanda Puraanas, proving that they're Vaishnava kshetras and the devata is Lakshmi, not Shivapatni Durga. We could ask the same question to the Shaktas who run the temples of Kolhapur Maha Lakshmi, when almost all Vaishnavas consider it to be Vishnu patni Lakshmi and there are again proofs from the Shaastras, stating so.
Sensible Hindus don't have objections to others' beliefs or who runs a temple, as long as one is a devotee of that particular devata. Several other temples were also taken over by Maadhvas because Shripaada Madhvacharya and other Tattvavadi scholars defeated the owners of those temples in debates and thus, it is obvious that the temple would go to them. And what was wrong in it? Maadhvas were managing the temples quite well, since centuries, until non-Maadhvas appeared at places like Kukke Subrahmanya and started their internal politics.
@@venkatakrishna1157As you're a Shaiva advaitin , I understand your disappointment 😅. The junior pontiff of a famous Shuva advaita mutt in Karnataka, came to Dakshina Karnataka to try to do some obscure digvijaya and in the bargain blabbered nonsense regarding the Bhagavata purana, quoting his own perverse and self concocted interpolation. 😅. Till date, he's running away from providing proper proof on the Bhagavata and his fanciful 😅😅statements 😅😅!!
Guess,we all know where that Hatred of usurping thr property of a Vaishnava comes from.
Haraye Namaha.
LOL, what are you even talking? That's exactly how temples were acquired back in the day. If they belonged to the same Guru parampara, why will they even debate with each other or acquire the temple of the vanquished party!?
And if people think that rightfully winning a Matha is "capturing someone's wife," I pity their frontal cortex. Fanatics are those who are narrow-minded and will find some excuse to spread hatred against others, no matter what.
Padma Purana declares Sada Shiva to be originator of Brahma, Vishnu and Maheshwor in Patala Khanda chapter 108! How is that possible! Because Padma Puran to Vaishnav Text hai phir yaha Sada Shiva ko supreme kyu bataya ja rha hai? Vaishnavacharyas ka kya vichar hai ispe aur apka kya vichar hai? Hare Kṛṣṇa 🙇🏻
Harihi Om.
It was explained in the video on the classification of the Puraanas. The Padma Puraana has Shaiva sections and Vaishnava sections too. Also, it has interpolations, so we do not know if those shlokas are 100% authentic.
@@bhaktideets oh thanks 🙇🏻
Also, puranas are written in three ways or भाषा ie, guhya, darshana, samdhi and these 18 puranas are classified into 3 categories satwik 6 raajasik 6 and tamasik 6
So while interpreting puranas you should never go by literal meaning ... that should be tallied with pancharatragama, shrutis, Mahabharata , hare krishna
Prabhuji, What is the meaning of 33 koti devi-devta according to tattva vada?
Is it 33 types or 33 crores devi-devta?
Harihi Om.
Actually, it's 33 crore, since 'type' or category doesn't really make sense. We may cover this in an upcoming video. The main devatas are 33, but totally, including their wives and assistants, there are 33 crore devatas who inhabit Svarga Loka. This is evident from a conversation of Rshi Yaajnavalkya, in the Brhadaaranyaka Upanishad.
@@bhaktideets Thank you prabhuji for explaining. Hare Krsna🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Fact is that mass level of propaganda and interpolation, MI's interpretation Against lord shiv, shiv hater extremists unable to demeans the glory of lord shiv.From middle era to now, Kitne aye or kitne gye kuch ni ukhd pye, shiv supremacy or shiv puja iss Brahmand ke ant take hti rehgi, keep trying your best,. Har Har mahadev ,jai paratpara parameshwara. 🙏
Haraye Namaha.
Cope harder, fanatic. ☕ Yes, as said in the Mahaabhaarata, Vaishnava Dharma exists eternally and we shall continue worshiping Shri Rudra Deva as per the Vaishnava Aagamas and with the prayers written by Shri Madhvacharya. Shiva-dveshi, my foot!
@@bhaktideets look who is talking about hardcore extremism ,one sided bigoted hypocrites 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Haraye Namaha.
Indeed, that's you only, after all.
@@bhaktideets Har is name of lord shiv haraye namah .after sometimes you people started claiming shiv is even not exist 🤡🤡
Haraye Namaha.
'Haraye' literally means "to/for Hari," not Hara. None of us ever claimed that Shiva is non-existent, because Shri Rudra is a Devata, not your intellect!
BTW, enough of deviating from the topic. Have you even got any actual arguments left or only your coping techniques? 🤣
Hindi mein bhi video banaiye 👑😇👍
Hello Prabhu
Caste system ko madhva Sampraday mein kaise mana jata hey by birth ya Swavab aur Karm k anusar 🙇🏻Sripada Madhvacharya ji ka kya maat tha isske upar?🙏😊🌺
Harihi Om.
Bohot puraani Vaishnava sampradaayo birth-based varnaashrama ko hi shikara karte he. Shripaada Ramanujacharya aur Shripaada Shankaracharya bhi vahi accept kiya. Lekin varnaashrama sirf partially birth-based he. Dvijo (Braahmanas, Kshatriyas and Vaishyas) ke beech koi discrimination nahi he. Aur exceptionally, Shudro ko bhi Veda adhyaayana me svikaar kiya he. Shri Kanaka Daasa lower caste se the, lekin vo Madhva sampradaaya ka ek Maha Pandita aur poet ban gaye.
@@bhaktideets oh thanks prabhu matlab Vedic mantra bhi recite kar sakte hey?😇🙏Aur prabhu ek aur doubt tha ki Madhavacharya ji ne Mahabharat tatparya nirnay k chapter21 verse 103 mein aisa kyu keh rhe hai ki wo Shaivao k Leader ko marne k baad wo sabse bade vaishnav ban jayenge kyunki Mayavaadis ye dikhake Sri Madhvacharya ji ko defame kar rhe hey..aur ek last sawal ki sri Madhvacharya ji ka intercaste marriage k upar kya manna tha😇🙏
Harihi Om.
Only Dvijas can recite the Veda mantras and learn all the Shaastras. However, sincere Shudras who are trustworthy enough, may have the chance of becoming Dvijas, if the Guru allows it and feels that the disciple is trustworthy. But these are exceptions.
Regarding that shloka of the MTN, it is nothing more than cherry-picking by those pseudo-Mayavadi Shaivas and prachanna Hari-dveshis. The context was about Jaraasandha, since he was a Shaiva and how the kings he had imprisoned, later became devotees of Shri Krshna, as soon as they were released from captivity, when Jaraasandha was killed. It has nothing to do with killing Shaivas. It is talking about how raakshasas like him were (taamasika and fake) Shaivas.
Shripaada Madhvacharya never commented on intercalate marriage, since jaati and varna are quite unrelated, though jaati has currently become linked to varna, now. All philosophers, including Shripaada Madhvacharya, despised intervarna marriage, since that’s what is said in the Dharma Shaastras. Varna is one’s social class and standard. Marrying someone from a totally different varna would mean that one is intermixing with people of different standards.
During ancient times, different people belonging to the same caste, could belong to different varnas, since it was based on occupation and practice of the Shaastras. Only those born to Shudra parents weren’t allowed to learn the Vedas and elevate their varna. However, now, it is fully complicated, since castes themselves are associated to certain varnas.
@@bhaktideets okk 🥰 thanks prabhu
@@bhaktideets prabhu mujhe online mein ye mila
Madhvacharya in his Tatparya Nirnaya
~if there are superior attitude in Sudra then he is known as Brahmin (अधिकाश्चेद् गुणा: शूद्रे ब्रह्मणादिः स उच्यते) &Brahmin of inferior attributes is known as Sudra(ब्रह्मणोऽप्यल्पगुणक: शूद्र एवेति कीर्तितः)
And on top of that devotees of Vishnu," The shuddha Satwik bhakta" transcendence above from four-fold division. (विष्णुभक्तिश्चनुगता सर्ववर्णेषु
विश्पतिम्)
Mentioned by Madhvacharya
Varna& Jati are diff.
Varna is आंतरिक जीव स्वरूप
Jay Shripad Madhvacharya 🙏😊
Jay Gauranga 🙏🥰
Hare Krishna 🙏😌
To kya shudra ki quality wala Brahman shudra ban jayenge?🙏
ua-cam.com/video/Sez6F31vetM/v-deo.html👈
prabhu Is Sada Shiva and Shankar shiva different or the same?
Prabhu Is sri Ganesha is an incarnation of Sri krishna As mentioned in Bramha vaivarta puran?
Please reply prabhu..🙏🙏
Harihi Om.
Those are Gaudiya Vaishnava concepts and since we are Tattvavadis, we cannot explain them. Most Vaishnava sampradaayas do not have a concept of Sadashiva or other forms of Shri Shiva. There is only one Rudra, who is the son of Shri Brahmaa.
Regarding Shri Ganapati, he is again considered a living entity and a vibhuti of Shri Vishnu, with Vishnu as his antaryaamin. We do not consider the present day edition of the Brahma Vaivarta Puraana to be authentic, since it has several interpolations.
@@bhaktideets dhanyavad prabhu. I am a Gaudiya Vaishnav and My family members are tattvavadi vaishnav🙏
@@চপেরচুল vai hamare bengal mein Tatvavadi kaha par milte hey tum to bengali ho phir tumhare Parivar ne diksha kaha se liya tha🙇🏻Hare Krishna 🙏😊
calling Siva lower to Vayu ans Calling Vishnu equal to allah ☝️🤓 Follieh Paishnavism
Haraye Namaha.
Source? Trust me, vro!! 😭😩😫😂 Allah is definitely not equal to ANY Devata and the Vaishnava Aagamas and Puraanas state that Rudra is subordinate to Brahmaa and Vaayu. You may cope hard.
Hare Krishna...Sada Shiva Vaishnavacharyas k according kon hai kya wo jeeva hai?🙏
No he is quadruple expansion of lord known as sankrashana
Harihi Om.
There is no concept of Sadaashiva within most Vaishnava sampradaayas. Sadaashiva is just one of the names of Shri Rudra. There is only one Shiva, who is Paarvatipati, the son of Brahmaa and is an aavesha of Bhagavaan Sankarshana.
Harihi Om.
No, Sankarshana is Shri Vishnu’s form, who is the originator of Shri Rudra and Shri Aadi Shesha.
Kya aap ek baat mujhe bata sakte ho ki "Bodhsar" naam ki koi book Narhari Teertha ji ne likhi hai kya?
Harihi Om.
Shri Narahari Teertha was one of the direct disciples of Shripaada Madhvacharya, but we can't confirm whether Bodhasaara is his work or by some other personality named 'Narahari'.
Regarding Sadashiva, this concept of a higher Shiva is accepted only by Shaivas, Shaktas and only certain Vaishnavas, such as Gaudiyas. As per the Aagamas, there is only one Rudra Deva, who is the devata of Manas Tattva, the son of Shri Brahmaa, the greatest Vaishnava and like the other devatas, a jeeva whose position shall be occupied by another jeeva, in upcoming cycles of creation.
@@bhaktideets ok thanks..Hare Krishna😇
@@bhaktideets aap mujhe kuch Pancharatra agamas texts ka naam batayenge jaha inn sab bisey ko detailed mein samjhaya gya ho😇
Harihi Om.
You can refer to the Saattvata Samhita, Eeshvara Samhita, Lakshmi Tantra and Paushkara Samhita. They're important Aagamas.
The BGM seems a little distracting when trying to hear your narration. I'm not saying BGM is not necessary but a slightly less noisy version would help.
Harihi Om.
Yes, that has been fixed in our latest video.
Harihi Om 🙇🏻
Mujhe ek point samajh nhi aaya ki Narayana Panditacharya ji ne sach mein Shankaracharya ji ko Maniman Demon kaha hai kya?ya phir ye myth hai?🙏
Aur ek sawal tha ki kya aj k time mein Tatvavaad aur advait ka debate hota hai?
Harihi Om.
We would not prefer discussing this publicly on the social media.
The mention of this comes in the work of Shri Naaraayana Panditacharya known as 'Mani Manjari'. It cannot be ascertained that Mani Manjari is completely authentic and has no additions, as it is well known that during the 16th century, there were intense conflicts between Vaishnavas, Smaartas and Shaivas.
Smaartas even wrote works such as Manikyamanjari, Gomanjari, etc., which demean Shripaada Madhvacharya. There is an interpolation in the Saura Puraana that even calls him a demon. At this point, it is not worth discussing all this, since these are old conflicts that are not paid heed to.
@@bhaktideets ok Harihi Om 🙇🏻🙏🌸
Prabhuji, What is your sampraday's Mool mantra(guruparampara)???
Harihi Om.
It's the Naaraayana Ashtaakshara mantra, 'Om Namo Naaraayanaaya'.
@@bhaktideets It means the madhavacharya and ramanujacharya sampraday mantra are same.
Harihi Om.
Yes.
Harihi Om.
During combination of words, 'Namaha' turns into 'Namo'. While chanting, it is 'Om Namo Naaraayanaaya', since the words are combined. These are concerned with Sanskrit grammar. Plus, the Naaraayana Upanishad reads the same, 'Namo', in the combined form.
10:37
Harihi Om 🙏
Vyasa Bhagavan is Vishnu himself right Then why did you say Vaishnavas worship Vishnu excluding Vyasa?
Harihi Om.
Yes, but only specific avataaras of Bhagavaan Vishnu are recommended to be worshiped. Also, Sri Vaishnavas consider Vyaasa Deva to be an aavesha of Shri Vishnu and not a saakshaat avataara, which is why we mentioned him while talking about the concept of sharanaagati.
Nonetheless, we, being Tattvavadis, consider Bhagavaan Vyaasa to be a saakshaat avataara only.
😭😭😭SIR, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE EXPOSE "SANATAN DHARMA DECODED" CHANNEL'S VIDEO"ABRAHAMIC SECTS".HE HAS INCLUDED SRIPADA MADHVACHARYA AND TALKING HELL ABOUT THEM IN THE ENDING OF VIDEO
Haraye Namaha.
We avoid getting into conflicts with other UA-camrs or trolls and prefer to focus on propagating bhakti and our Siddhaanta, instead.
@@bhaktideets
!! HARI SARVOTTAMA !!
!! VAYU JEEVOTTAMA !!
SIR, ATLEAST EXPOSE INDOLOGISTS LIKE AC VASU WHO CLAIMS IN HIS BOOKS THAT SRIPADA MADHVACHARYA DVAITA PHILOSOPHY IS INFLUENCED BY CHRISTIANITY,,COMPARING JESUS AS SON OF GOD AND MADHVACHARYA AS SON OF VISHNU AS VAYU AND RUBBISH THINGS!!!!😈😈😈😈😈😈
Hare Raama.
Not to worry, we will expose all thesenonsensical claims in general made by anti-Vaishnavas, in some of our upcoming videos.
🤦😢All philosophy's. religion.God's.knowledge.is not totally for humanitys❤
In the world of HUMAN...past history...only war war war
Physical.mental.intellectual.war war war .that's all
So I hate human world🤦
I love animals world👌👍
I respect The power❤ of PRAKRUTI....
Who wants this all knowledge which increase our false ego 🤦
Against humanitarian❤.
Haraye Namaha.
Bruh! What are you even talking?
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Why you removed tat vam asi video???
Harihi Om.
We will republish it later. There were some edits and video quality corrections to be made.
@@bhaktideets ok,
I will request you to make 2 videos on following topics-
1.Lord Rudra is a post which we can acquire, with reference from scriptures.
2.2nd Naamapradh what is it real meaning?
Whenever you get time It's upto you, it is my humble request.
Harihi Om.
Sure. The first one was already done on our video on ISKCON's stance on Shri Shiva's position.
@@bhaktideets I saw that, I am saying if you have More references than that from scriptures.
Harihi Om.
Explicit references are limited and only few in number, like those which we quoted. However, we may provide a few more references in our later videos.
ब्रह्मा मामाश्रितो राजन्नाहं कंचिदुपाश्रितः ।
ममाश्रयो न कश्चित्तु सर्वेषामाश्रयो ह्यहम् ॥ ३८ ॥
(Shriman Naaraayana said,) All devas take refuge in Rudra, Rudra takes refuge in Brahmaa, Brahmaa takes refuge in Me and I don't take refuge in anyone, for, O Bharata, I am the One who is independent.
-Mahaabhaarata, Ashvamedha Parva, Chapter 118, Shlokas 37-38 (Kumbhakonam Edition) (quoted by Shripaada Madhvacharya, in the Mahaabhaarata Taatparya Nirnaya, Adhyaaya 2, Shloka 117)
ममान्तरात्मा तव च ये चान्ये देहसंज्ञिताः ।
सर्वेषां साक्षिभूतो ऽसौ न ग्राह्यः केन चित् क्व चित् ॥
(Shri Brahmaa said,) “Shri Hari is the antaraatma of me (Shri Brahmaa), you (Shri Shiva) and all the other embodied beings. He is situated as the witness in all the living entities. He can never be comprehended by any material senses.”
-Mahaabhaarata, Shaanti Parva, Adhyaaya 339, Shloka 4
We may cover these in a video on the positions of different devatas as per Vaishnavism.
I love this video.......❤️.....but ISKCON is doing wrong.
What is iskcon doing???
Iskcon consider Lord shiva as top most vaishnav and Lord krishna as supreme personality of God head.
That's their philosophy what's wrong in that!!!
Nothing wrong. Iskcon is doing great.
Your from mangaluru? Accent seems very familiar.
Harihi Om.
Nope, Chikkamagaluru, near Udupi, Karnataka.
What a fake vedio
Harihi Om.
What a fake comment by you, who doesn't even know the spelling of "video".
Can I talk to you?
Harihi Om.
Sure. You can message us through email, Instagram, Twitter or our blog. Refer to the links in the about section of our channel.
What philosophy you are upholding madva philosophy's
Dwaitha of madwa is a foolish lopsided philospphy which has no logic.
The ultimate philosophy of adi shankara is the correct
The atma and paramatma is same but madwa says ot os seperate, is absolutely wrong
If you have no work pl keep quiet dont spread mis information.
Haraye Namaha.
Ok, Mr. Buddhi Shatru, all the Shaastras, including the Vedas, Brahma Sutras and Aagamas are wrong, since they repeat what Madhvacharya himself said. 🤡🤡 The Upanishads themselves have ample vaakyas mentioning the fact that the jeevas are subordinate to Paramaatma. The last Paada of the Brahma Sutras explicitly mention how the jeevas cannot completely acquire all characteristics of Paramaatma, even after moksha. The Vaishnava Aagamas, namely Pancharaatra, which are praised repeatedly in the Mahaabhaarata, again say that the subordinacy of jeevas with respect to Eeshvara is eternal, but that is wrong! 🤡
य आत्मनि तिष्ठन् *आत्मनोऽन्तरो* यमात्मा न वेद यस्यात्मा शरीरं य आत्मानमन्तरो यमयति स त आत्मान्तर्याम्यमृतः ।
“The One who is established in the Aatma, *discrete from the Aatma*, whom the Aatma is unaware of, whose body is the Aatma and distinctly controls the Aatma from within - He is your Antaryaami and Immortal Ruler, know Him.”
-Shatapatha Braahmana, Kaanda 14, Adhyaaya 6, Braahmana 7, Mantra 30
BTW, we have far more work than you and aren't unemployed, which is why we do not search for someone else's videos to make nonsensical comments. And you have no right to talk about what others can preach and cannot. You are not the ruler of the nation to deny someone's right to freedom of religion. Lastly, when several scholars could not stand a chance against Madhvacharya and were defeated by him in debates, making him one of the Trayaachaaryas, how can keyboard warriors like you stand even close? 😂🤣 Came out of nowhere to declare that darshanas of reputed Aachaaryas, who were undefeated and which are supported by the Shaastras themselves, are "misinformation" and "foolish"! 🤡 Do you realize you are literally arguing that you yourself are Bhagavaan, just like Paundraka and don't realize who is actually foolish? 🤣
Hi
Haraye Namaha
@@bhaktideets Haraye Namah!
I want to ask you how can I get knowledge of Dvaita SuddhAnta being a Shudra.
@@TrainsInsider haraye namah!!
Philosophy can be learnt by anyone including shudra.... But veda mantras should not be recited by shudras but still they can hear vedas and understand
@@TrainsInsiderYes. Listen to the upanyas of Mahabharata Tatparya nirnaya from a Madhva guru or pandit in the language of your choice. It's will really pave a way for your sadhna ❤
Haraye Namaha.
Pretty much the same way how Dvijas do it. Read Madhvacharya's granthas, especially the Brahma Sutra bhaashya and works on the Bhagavat Geeta, to get a good idea of the Siddhaanta.