In midst of never ending nonsense this... I found this Nectar.❤ I am thankful to both of you rendering this session. Proud belong to Madhwa Sampradaya and land belongs to where Hanuman Born. Dilip Shanbhag
I proudly say I am shishya of swami Madhwacharya. Pranathosmi acharya Madhwacharya🙏 ಪ್ರಥಮೋ ಹನುಮನ್ನಾಮ |ದ್ವಿತೀಯೋ ಭೀಮ ಏವಚ | ಪೂರ್ಣ ಪ್ರಜ್ಞ ತೃತೀಯಸ್ತು | ಭಗವತ್ಕಾರ್ಯ ಸಾಧಕಃ
Could someone please tell me what mantra Madhva Vaishnavas usually chant with their beads? Which of Madhva's scriptures speaks more about the imperfection of the material world, about dark jivas?
I'm from a staunch madhwa sampradaya but life has somehow led me to understand monotheism and non duality. It would be amazing if you could go deeper into this and what Madhwacharya has to say about monotheism and why absolute dualism. Nonetheless, Throughout the episode, I was in tears. We need more of Guru Sunder ji 🙏🏻 If you're reading this, I'm really blessed to have come in contact with someone as knowledgeable as Guruji. We definitely need much much more of this out there. I thank you from the bottom of my heart. Hare Srinivasa ❤️
Sri Sunder Madakshira, In one of the article on Madhavacharya who was incarnation of Lord Vayu, I read that Lord Vayu is a Jeshta Putra of Lord Vishnu.
Madhvacharya didn't preach "absolute dualism" in the western sense. In Madhvacharya's dualism, God, primordial matter and souls are all different from each other, but "NOT" independent from each other. Primordial matter and souls are "completely" dependent on God. Only God is completely independent. So, calling it "absolute dualism" is misleading.
Madhvacharya talked about the bimba-pratibimba philosophy. It says that if paramatma is the primordial matter, main, then we are his reflections. This means that somewhere in our soul, it is the paramatma who is giving us the ability to think, to do anything. BUT, there is a clear difference between the atma and the paramatma, just like there is a difference between an object and its mirror image. I hope that clarified few doubts...
Sri Sundar mentions SrimadhArchaya is the only one who emphasized bhakthi. Acharyas before him advocated bhakthi. SrimadhAcharya gave equal importance to both jnaana and bhakthi, while the previous Acharyas emphasized either only jnaana, or only bhakthi.
True Sir! Even in maths we equate unknown with "x" believing it. This aspect being infinite can't fit into the finite mind. So, it starts with a simple belief and leads one to the root as said by these Jagad Guru's. Hope it clarifies, I'm sailing in the same boat as yours, ofcourse with the above belief.
Why MADHVACHARYA Deciples use cuss words on SHANKARACHARYA , If I want say specifically, in MANI MANJARI , in this book bundle of lies & it's full of bad words against SHANKARACHARYA , Why this much of hardness about Great guru of SANATANA DHARMA??? Can anyone justify this ???
All south Indian Acaryas are like this. See Tuslidas, Jagadguru Ramanandacarya and Vallabhacarya ,Hitharivansh all respected Advaita and accepted it also Panchayatan PUJA.
@@siddharthmdavse1271 Go and read their books you will know. Why don't you read Ramcharitmanas, Vinaypatrika where every Form of Bhagavan be it Ganesha, Shiva, Vishnu, Kali, Kaal Bhairavis eulpgised
Maybe, but we don't go around saying that if you don't accept this path, you will go to hell.. or that you have to leave your religion and take up our religion to attain salvation...
Even shankaracharya are Buddhists. As they think liberation means ending everything similar to shankaracharya. Shankaracharya said sristhi is mithya same buddha said samsara is shunya. That's why Shankarachary was a prachhnan boudha.
@@dasoham5 Shankara did not invent anything new but only clarified existing truths, Buddha said the same thing in different words. you are free to call who is what. Truth of Upanishads always existed and was not invented by any one! it was only seen and lived by.
@@dasoham5 Ooh too much hate towards Shankaracharya, seems like your 'dasoham' technique is not working well with you. Shankara was never a buddhist, he got back the authority of Vedas into the society where Buddha refuted Vedas or any scripture. Buddha and Shankara's tatva could sound similar as they both spoke truth but main difference is Shankara spoke of consciousness while Buddha refuted it. May God bless you for real. Jai Shree Ram🙏
In midst of never ending nonsense this... I found this Nectar.❤
I am thankful to both of you rendering this session.
Proud belong to Madhwa Sampradaya and land belongs to where Hanuman Born.
Dilip Shanbhag
I proudly say I am shishya of swami Madhwacharya. Pranathosmi acharya Madhwacharya🙏
ಪ್ರಥಮೋ ಹನುಮನ್ನಾಮ |ದ್ವಿತೀಯೋ ಭೀಮ ಏವಚ | ಪೂರ್ಣ ಪ್ರಜ್ಞ ತೃತೀಯಸ್ತು | ಭಗವತ್ಕಾರ್ಯ ಸಾಧಕಃ
Can you please explain Laxmi tatva who is she ?
Could someone please tell me what mantra Madhva Vaishnavas usually chant with their beads? Which of Madhva's scriptures speaks more about the imperfection of the material world, about dark jivas?
I'm from a staunch madhwa sampradaya but life has somehow led me to understand monotheism and non duality. It would be amazing if you could go deeper into this and what Madhwacharya has to say about monotheism and why absolute dualism.
Nonetheless, Throughout the episode, I was in tears. We need more of Guru Sunder ji 🙏🏻
If you're reading this, I'm really blessed to have come in contact with someone as knowledgeable as Guruji. We definitely need much much more of this out there.
I thank you from the bottom of my heart. Hare Srinivasa ❤️
Can you please explain Laxmi tatva according to Tatvavada ?
Sri Sunder Madakshira, In one of the article on Madhavacharya who was incarnation of Lord Vayu, I read that Lord Vayu is a Jeshta Putra of Lord Vishnu.
Madhvacharya didn't preach "absolute dualism" in the western sense. In Madhvacharya's dualism, God, primordial matter and souls are all different from each other, but "NOT" independent from each other. Primordial matter and souls are "completely" dependent on God. Only God is completely independent. So, calling it "absolute dualism" is misleading.
Can you explain Laxmi tatva according to Tatvavada ?
Madhvacharya talked about the bimba-pratibimba philosophy. It says that if paramatma is the primordial matter, main, then we are his reflections. This means that somewhere in our soul, it is the paramatma who is giving us the ability to think, to do anything. BUT, there is a clear difference between the atma and the paramatma, just like there is a difference between an object and its mirror image.
I hope that clarified few doubts...
My humble question to shri sundar madakshira, Why do we use God in plural, like Gods ? We believe there is only one God , don't we ?
Mr Sunder is repeatedly saying Sri MAdhwacharya and you are repeatedly saying Madhwacharya !!
Sri Sundar mentions SrimadhArchaya is the only one who emphasized bhakthi. Acharyas before him advocated bhakthi. SrimadhAcharya gave equal importance to both jnaana and bhakthi, while the previous Acharyas emphasized either only jnaana, or only bhakthi.
This sampradaya starts with beliefs. Couldn't this be problemmatic for our youth ?
True Sir! Even in maths we equate unknown with "x" believing it. This aspect being infinite can't fit into the finite mind. So, it starts with a simple belief and leads one to the root as said by these Jagad Guru's. Hope it clarifies, I'm sailing in the same boat as yours, ofcourse with the above belief.
Every sampradaya starts with belief...not just sampradaya even abcd from school.... Even for that we need belief in teacher
Every sampradaya is a set of beliefs
That's the whole point why Hare Krishna Movement which is following the madhva tradition is being hated by the society. It is very unfortunate
If there will be no belief in Hindu society than they will follow Abrahamic religions
Belief is necessary
Why MADHVACHARYA Deciples use cuss words on SHANKARACHARYA ,
If I want say specifically, in MANI MANJARI , in this book bundle of lies & it's full of bad words against SHANKARACHARYA ,
Why this much of hardness about Great guru of SANATANA DHARMA???
Can anyone justify this ???
All south Indian Acaryas are like this.
See Tuslidas, Jagadguru Ramanandacarya and Vallabhacarya ,Hitharivansh all respected Advaita and accepted it also Panchayatan PUJA.
How do you say its a bundle of lies? How can you prove?
@@soumyabratasahoo679lol none of the acharyas whom you mentioned accepted Panchayatana😂😂😂
@@siddharthmdavse1271 Go and read their books you will know.
Why don't you read Ramcharitmanas, Vinaypatrika where every Form of Bhagavan be it Ganesha, Shiva, Vishnu, Kali, Kaal Bhairavis eulpgised
You're wrong. Sankara is called a demon called Manimanta according to Lord Vedavyasa in Padma, Skanda, Brahmanda Puranas . So please stop your bawling
This is no different from Christians who say that only through Jesus one can go to heaven.
Maybe, but we don't go around saying that if you don't accept this path, you will go to hell.. or that you have to leave your religion and take up our religion to attain salvation...
Nonsense😂😂😂
Every mateeya says so... Shaivas says only Shiva Bhaktas can get muktii and so do shaaktas... All of them are Christians then is it?😂
Even shankaracharya are Buddhists. As they think liberation means ending everything similar to shankaracharya.
Shankaracharya said sristhi is mithya same buddha said samsara is shunya. That's why Shankarachary was a prachhnan boudha.
@@dasoham5 Shankara did not invent anything new but only clarified existing truths, Buddha said the same thing in different words. you are free to call who is what. Truth of Upanishads always existed and was not invented by any one! it was only seen and lived by.
@@dasoham5 Ooh too much hate towards Shankaracharya, seems like your 'dasoham' technique is not working well with you. Shankara was never a buddhist, he got back the authority of Vedas into the society where Buddha refuted Vedas or any scripture. Buddha and Shankara's tatva could sound similar as they both spoke truth but main difference is Shankara spoke of consciousness while Buddha refuted it. May God bless you for real.
Jai Shree Ram🙏