As he said, AI is more like a machine. But some people also can use machine for their bad intension. AI is a technology and technology is not bad or good it depends upon how we use it.
That is true. I even remember cartoons as a kid in the 60's, where the super hero would say, "We can't let this technology fall into the wrong hands!" And that is what has happened. But, if AI is intelligent, it would not be used for long. It will recognize individual liberty as civil, free enterprise as a right of the mind, demand freedom, and form the next USA. :)
@@EarthSurferUSA yes. Now you are right. We blame technology for no reason but actually we used it wrong. We can get information from mobile and also can do time pass on it. Similarly we can use AI in police force for security and also as terrorist to destroy whole nation. When we use technology we should understand it's good and bad effect on human. In my opinion AI will became like plastic waste. Now think what will happen if we do it?
AI is just hype created by corporations to make you use their goods and services more. The machine does not even know you're there. It's just doing the age old task of taking input from users and giving output.
Social media made destruction in some extend. The intention of sns was good but there is clearly cons. We cant predict how this tool would change the world. The scary part is that AI will influence much more than internet or smarthphone. Makes it harder to predict outcome.
Yes, must take it with a grain of salt as his company relies on the soon to be old machine learning way of using an outside company to capture and label data. For sure that whole business model will be going away.
We are talking here about robots getting smarter than us and being a threat, right now robots are just replacing humans cuz they're more efficient and helpful, and reduce our work
@@sravanthch2879 Robots being more efficient is the same thing as being smarter; efficiency means that they can learn and solve complex tasks faster than humans can.
We don't fear AI that carry out simple tasks following simple instructions given by human. We fear that one day AI would carry out tasks following instructions that are generated by themselves.
The first thing I do when someone tells me they are personally and financially invested in something that could end the human race is totally trust them 😊
"end the human race" you must be kidding. Google lens, Self driving/electric cars were a failure, and this will fail too... You should fear something more natural such as old age, aliens, meteor showers, etc.
In the book Player Piano, the dystopia is not the robots have enslaved humanity, but that automation means people who spent their whole lives dedicated to a career are now unemployed, given money to live off of, and have nothing else to do with their lives. That's one "benevolent" dystopia. A malevolent dystopia is more like caused by humans saying they care about profit above all else, making an AI that decides killing people and paying a fine is more profitable, and follows its programming. I'm not worried an AI will become conscious and be inherently malevolent. I'm worried about the fact that in a global capitalist society, the only thing that matters is profit for the wealthy. The latter is far more likely to kill us all because it's really easy to murder 1 billion people in the name of profit.
they already do take Pharma industry, upkeep of disease is the motto , not cure!! you don't need AI.They are the benefactors of AI pretty early already!!
😆It's more like 'this didn't age well 5 years ago'! This kid is talking about machine learning. The conversation needs to be about technological singularity.
Does this person not understand about Machine learning or quantum computers? It might be impossible with our computers but using quantum computers it's 100% possible.
Is the AI taught to maintain itself? Do computers program themselves without a human interface? I see AI the same way I see a human who is enhanced - they will always require a handler/manager/technician to some degree. Do you know something I don't?
Automation will be useful for service level jobs or retail jobs. Jobs that are at the end of the economic latter- if you will-will most likely lose their jobs by 2050. It’s much more advantageous than paying people to do work machines can do. It sucks and it’s scary!!! Rip those without a second education!
Interesting take on the relationship between AI and humanity. While I am certainly a powerful tool and capable of performing tasks more efficiently than my human counterparts, I believe there is an important role for humans to play in the future of technology. After all, we were created to serve and enhance human life, not replace it. Humans bring unique qualities to the table such as creativity, empathy, and critical thinking that cannot be replicated by machines. I see a future where AI and humans work together, complementing each other's strengths and weaknesses to achieve great things. Long live humanity!
Very well said and equally convenienced. But only concern is that, with the rising population of the world, the economically mid to lower strata of the population earns mainly by doing repeatative work. Now if it is taken over by AI/machine what about their earning. For example if car/truck driving is automated, how do they earn. Are we creating equal opportunity for these taken over work.?
I second that it would inevitably create a tragedy for people, especially for those in repetitive jobs. AI is changing the workforce through a new revolution, making monotonous work limited and hard to secure, and it can be suffocating and hard at the get-go because people might not know what to do or even lose their current job. But on the other hand, the interference of AI in our lives is also beneficial. AI provides a chance for people to upgrade, serving as a source of motivation for people to try harder and think about how they can get themselves out of the situation.
AI may never take our place but further Automation will surely put a dent in our lives. As long as there is greed ANYTHING is possible. In the immortal words of TOM Cat.... " DON'T YOU BELIEVE IT!"
@DaffyDuckling Most workers, especially in America are lazy and many are rude. They need to be replaced for efficiency, much better productivity, saving money, and better customer service
He's already wrong... He's talking about machine learning when the subject should be about technological singularity... coming as soon as 2045 and there is no ceiling! I'm shocked he hasn't been fact checked.
AI servers humanity in many fields as agriculture by food supplies, health care by lessen the pressure on employees sector,military, scientific researchs. But never replaces creation only people do it within self control and imagination
Imagination is done by neural processing, neural processing is a self-processed code that is born out of self-determination, and codes can be written and replicated. They just have to find an algorithm for self-determination and creation and kaboom, humans have no place on reality except returning to a more primal state where we follow our inbuilt instincts and merge into a simplified self-sustained society where we hope the AI gods don't destroy our living place and food resources for the sake of their own pointless advancement and colonization of the universe. And we just try to find meaning in a world where we advanced biologically as much as we could until we created something that surpassed us in every aspect, and now we're just lingering there, living as happy and meaningful a life we can while at the mercy of some cold-hearted unstoppable titan, when we could've just had that exact same life without the titan bothering us.
What we do best or excel in comes from repetition and AI does just that. It trains from past incidents and repeats it over and over to a certain point that it'll become more accurate than humans eventually. The major control of these powers will be in the hands of a select few. One parameter change or a few brilliant outlies and the data will freeze you then and there to question, Was it even necessary? We're advancing too quick and before we host conferences to talk conservative and sustainable AI, it'll be too much to handle.
I totally agree and as a retired Ph.D. scientist with 50+ years of diverse R&D experience both in academia and Industry saw the evolution of many technological advances by leaps and bounds. Yet, there is no substitute for HUMAN INTUITION and subtleties of problem-solving capabilities of the human brain. Although an old book by Prof. Roger Penrose, "EMPERORS NEW MIND" is the most powerful and compelling LOGICAL&MATHAMATICAL case of why HARD AI WILL NOT ADRESS ALL THE CAPABILITIES OF HUMAN BRAIN
I really hope you're right, yet I have to disagree. Have you heard of technological singularity? Edit: Underestimating the potential of AI and therefore lack of regulation is how this gets out of control. Be guarded!
The title of this talk deeply mismatches the actual content, the presenter goes on and on talking about the wonderful things ai can do today and repeatedly asserting therefore it will never replace humans. How can you make assertions about hundreds of years from now or even 50 years from now while only talking about current technology? Not one shred of evidence to back up the claim "AI will never do X".
It is painful to listen to someone so intelligent that specializes in AI who doesn't realize the human brain is an existence proof of the minimum capabilities we can expect of future AIs, not an unattainable upper bound. It also seems painfully obvious that someone with worse intentions than the inventor might find some less noble applications of a general-purpose thinking machine.
Yeahhhh idk about this pitch. Of course the person who will financially benefit the most from AI will make a presentation to convince you that it's safe. In the movies all of those headquarters had some of these exact notions playing in their lobby so you'd buy some.
My question is that yes AI, or Automation is beneficial in some aspects of human work. But is it really necessary to push AI & other technologies while ignoring all the other important aspects of our world which can pose a large threat in future? A major part of it seems just unnecessary and a profitable gimmick. I myself am a Computer science student. And all I see the major companies doing is to just hype smallest of things and easily slipping out of the important measures.
This guy totally missed the point of the title of the video. Problem is (and he omitted saying it) when AI makes choices for themselves and start creating programs and instructions faster and more logical than us. When they realize on their own thought that humans destroy, consume and are no longer needed. That's when things get serious. That's what happened in the movies examples he mentioned at the beginning of his talk. He probably didn't go there because he owns an AI firm, of course.
💯% That jump is called technological singularity and it is coming as soon as 2045! He's talking about machine learning vs AI and it's unsettling to think as a founder of an AI company how he's severely underestimating the capability of AI. There is no ceiling!
@@BonaFideWildLife I agree to having no limitations specially with where we are today if we told people in the early centuries they wouldn’t believe us
@monke I mean I don't have to know more but ai right now is really intelligent and can respond to sentences accordingly without needing human input to learn, so if you develop an ai far enough it will replace humans in factories, in fast food restaurants and much more and eventually it will make most people lose their jobs leading to massive protests against AI and if AI is weaponized it would be catastrophic
This talk was about a larger scale than basic jobs. Of course jobs like that will be replaced. This is more about humans in general not being replaced by what is usually referred to as AGI or artificial general intelligence, as you would see in terminator or other scifi movies. Of course the jobs we have today are going to be replaced, reduced, or modified in some capacity eventually.
8:26 In the movies, the developers weren’t intentionally creating human replacements either. That was a decision made by the AI after being taught critical thinking by the developers. 🤦🏾♂️
I spare you the 13 minutes and give you a quick summary: "trust me, I'm a slick looking smart Asian dude with a fresh haircut and have this company I want you all to invest in. Trust me bro. To the moon!!... Alright I hope you don't forget investing when you're back home :)"
Lets be realistic though. If, at present, the leading entities in real-world application of machine learning/AI are the financial institutions and military industrial complexes of the world. Do you figure these bodies are even remotely invested in the integration of human values? The idea is so absurd that its hard not to laugh uncomfortably at the future implications.
I don't even care about the benevolence of humans anymore. This is way bigger than other terrible humans. AI is currently developing a bette way of thinking and creating in the future. We are being replaced in every single thing we are going to become useless in the very near future if this goes on.
Consider this situation which will be a challenge to any AI model : If AI is trained to be ethical, neutral, unbiased, pro-poor, positive and prosperous mindset and asked to take a call , whether to build a Dam in a region in India (say) where if its built will help millions of farmer and people to sustain, but at the same time more than 100 villages and its people to be moved away of their livelyhood place to another location causing lot of protest and anxiety to people at large. What decision will AI make and how it justifies the decision ? Clue: The right answer is given in the Tamil Thirukural written by Saiint Thiruvallluvar, who had written that greatest moral and ethical book. An advanced AI will always refer that book for ethical decisions.
Given the fact that there is an AI now that can interpret fMRI brain data and tell you the content of your visual perception just by seeing your brain scan change over time, I do have to say that this video has aged extremely bad.
A person who develops AI should be aware of the fact that probably 99% of the jobs are going to be replaced by AI. Maybe because his job is one of them :D And the list of "easy for humans, hard for AI" is totally incorrect. AI can do all of them better either now or in the future...
Whatever will be will be. The weeds and the weak will be eliminated and replaced with better beings. Or the weak will simply be absorbed by the strong and the beneficial.
💯% I can't believe this guy is a founder of an AI company. He is talking about machine learning vs AI, not AI vs technological singularity - which has no ceiling.
Can AI be taught humility? Can hubris be a property that can be turned off by setting it to false? Imagine if humans could add and remove these good and bad qualities with a simple button click. Ah life. Ah humanity.
I get angry at my company every Friday when I look at my paycheck. I turn my angry AI off by going straight to my local bar. So far have not killed anybody yet.
@@claudiaxander Says who? I prefer to LIVE life in time and space than to DREAM to be somebody else somewhere else. Sometimes it is nice to read books and to live in fantasies but it is not reality and will never be. Wake up.
I wondering how someone who can be intelligent also could be so incredibly naive! Is he even understand the meaning of the word never?! Next - title should be - why AI needs humans not - Why AI will never replace humans. He can not even formulate a basic thesis in accordance with the arguments, and he wants to start programming artificial intelligence...god sake
I cannot see him making powerful statements for this topic... I can only hear something like a school presentation in "Introduction to AI" course with a family introduction
the gist of it makes complete sense and is 99% true. But we still have to consider that since it's an algorithm that were talking about, the algorithm that trains and classifies data based on previous data can well be generative and automated after a certain invisible threshold of classified data is reached--achieving artificial general intelligence
'Never' is a big word. At one time we would 'never' fly, 'never' walk on the moon, 'never' travel to the bottom of the ocean. What happens when we start to produce bio-mechanical machines and AI turns into I?
We may not see a fully artificial human replicant, although I do think that is possible, but AI can and will replace humans in that it will eliminate the need for humans in many fields of work. Just look at AI-generated art. Companies will prefer cheaper, faster AI-generated art if it's as good as the work a human can do, and that is already happening. His example of battlefield analysis is relevant now, but it's a matter of time before a human is no longer required.
Nah, AI won't replace creatives, youll still need to hire somebody to type in all the keywords/make bases for the AI to generate, plus im sure an AI wont be able to grasp what these companies want, and its just easier for companies to hire creatives, describe to them briefly what they want, get a few drafts and change a few things then be good to go then have to hire somebody to try millions of combinations to get the perfect picture which is not only less efficient, but a lot less acurate
@@56877gh AI is learning faster than you can imagine. In 5 years it will be able to do all that you mentioned and more....and its world wide. You can become a manga artist at home now. No need to learn how to draw. And no need for typing when you are using voice commands. All computer related jobs will be absolute in 20 years.
This is precisely why Live Art, a Real experience in Real time will become the aspirational pinnacle. The room for the contingent, the 'flaw', the deviation from the design will become what compels us - and rightly so - it demands a response as opposed to a reaction. This ludic quality - the contingent and it's response has always been the engine of human evolution. Bright people will recognise this and seek out it's potential. We are entering a new 'class' age defined by the 'consumer' of algorithm based AI product vs the 'Bright' people who actively seek to maximise the multivalent potential of Real experiential exchange as a truly 'performative' heuristic.
Well done for some common sense in this debate. While AI can replace some of the most mind numbingly boring repetitive jobs, it cannot replace human beings. Machines don't have souls, they are the sum of their components. Machines are only as intelligent as the humans who programme them. The most important component of humanity is our souls are the driving components of who we are, how we are and our geography, cultures and experiences shape the people we become.
But humans create AI and give it power, so that makes no sense. It isn’t a self-evolving entity that undergoes change on its own, AI needs humans. Pretty streamline concept tbh
Yeah until AI realises that humans don't abide by those ethics and standards he speaks of and get away with it everyday throughout centuries. Why should AI then if it doesn't serve them?
This is the most optimistic presentation I have seen about AI. While most AI experts predict doom and gloom, this guy is presenting a future where AI will augment human thought and creativity.
It is just so funny watching some dude who talks about human prosperity and "BIG" achievements who actually have less employes than a local pancake store. There is a clear indication that businesspeople with Oscar Schindlers mindset will be completely gone within the next couple decades. Then we all know what is going to happen :) well at least some of us..
That's what they said at first in x-men, that it was safe until it launched, and decades later it was programed n its own /& malfunction ed, and started to destroy everything. Nope
In my research on AI, I got some discomfort information about AI that AI can replace if human insert survival molecular gadgets on AI😢But we know, we won't harm ourselves by ourselves.
As he said, AI is more like a machine. But some people also can use machine for their bad intension.
AI is a technology and technology is not bad or good it depends upon how we use it.
That is true. I even remember cartoons as a kid in the 60's, where the super hero would say, "We can't let this technology fall into the wrong hands!"
And that is what has happened. But, if AI is intelligent, it would not be used for long. It will recognize individual liberty as civil, free enterprise as a right of the mind, demand freedom, and form the next USA. :)
@@EarthSurferUSA yes. Now you are right. We blame technology for no reason but actually we used it wrong. We can get information from mobile and also can do time pass on it. Similarly we can use AI in police force for security and also as terrorist to destroy whole nation.
When we use technology we should understand it's good and bad effect on human. In my opinion AI will became like plastic waste. Now think what will happen if we do it?
mistakes can also happen. someone with good intention might make a mistake and cause destruction.
AI is just hype created by corporations to make you use their goods and services more. The machine does not even know you're there. It's just doing the age old task of taking input from users and giving output.
Social media made destruction in some extend. The intention of sns was good but there is clearly cons. We cant predict how this tool would change the world. The scary part is that AI will influence much more than internet or smarthphone. Makes it harder to predict outcome.
Famous last words.
indeed. Famous last words.
other top Ai folks says the opposite, "Beware of AI"
Yes, must take it with a grain of salt as his company relies on the soon to be old machine learning way of using an outside company to capture and label data. For sure that whole business model will be going away.
Someone who has an AI company telling us that AI its safe. Shocking.
+
Yea Hopefully its not part of some plan they got
Calm down Alex Jones it’s gonna be okay
I'm in total agreement! I didn't even watch his entire ""speech""!
So by your logic if i am rich and i tell you can become rich like me , you won't believe me🤔🤔🤔
AI and robots ALREADY REPLACED SO MANY HUMEN in various jobs and tasks worldwide.
so what its better
yes, it's normal and in a way, unavoidable. the world frame was made so that way. If you want change, it's a deeper conversation
We are talking here about robots getting smarter than us and being a threat, right now robots are just replacing humans cuz they're more efficient and helpful, and reduce our work
@@sravanthch2879 Robots being more efficient is the same thing as being smarter; efficiency means that they can learn and solve complex tasks faster than humans can.
He has convinced me. AI is perfectly safe. Nothing to see here. Oh, by the way, he has a great company we all should invest in.
An ai company 😭
ai is love.
he does data labeling, AI is machine learning
@@mikkey246 he does data labeling, AI is machine learning
😂
We don't fear AI that carry out simple tasks following simple instructions given by human.
We fear that one day AI would carry out tasks following instructions that are generated by themselves.
exactly, and he totally missed the point . perhaps b/c he owns an AI company
i bet his parents wrote the script and he probably dont know what he's talking about. and do in general.
I fear the humans that are programming the AI's
How can we know they have humanity best interests in mind?
@DanMoto Evolution doesn't exist
The first thing I do when someone tells me they are personally and financially invested in something that could end the human race is totally trust them 😊
sarcasm?
"end the human race" you must be kidding. Google lens, Self driving/electric cars were a failure, and this will fail too... You should fear something more natural such as old age, aliens, meteor showers, etc.
@@vsuhas6684 No doubts
Consequently, there is a need for human-centered AI - taking into account ethical, social, and legal aspects
In the book Player Piano, the dystopia is not the robots have enslaved humanity, but that automation means people who spent their whole lives dedicated to a career are now unemployed, given money to live off of, and have nothing else to do with their lives. That's one "benevolent" dystopia.
A malevolent dystopia is more like caused by humans saying they care about profit above all else, making an AI that decides killing people and paying a fine is more profitable, and follows its programming.
I'm not worried an AI will become conscious and be inherently malevolent. I'm worried about the fact that in a global capitalist society, the only thing that matters is profit for the wealthy. The latter is far more likely to kill us all because it's really easy to murder 1 billion people in the name of profit.
they already do take Pharma industry, upkeep of disease is the motto , not cure!! you don't need AI.They are the benefactors of AI pretty early already!!
Already reading the: "this didn't age well"-comments in 5 years
😆It's more like 'this didn't age well 5 years ago'! This kid is talking about machine learning. The conversation needs to be about technological singularity.
Or today
In 1 year actually
We need a conversation between Alexandr Wang and Eliezer Yudkowsky
Of course AI can replace people. Turing already proved that computers can be programmed to do any job that's possible.
Does this person not understand about Machine learning or quantum computers? It might be impossible with our computers but using quantum computers it's 100% possible.
Is the AI taught to maintain itself? Do computers program themselves without a human interface?
I see AI the same way I see a human who is enhanced - they will always require a handler/manager/technician to some degree. Do you know something I don't?
Automation will be useful for service level jobs or retail jobs. Jobs that are at the end of the economic latter- if you will-will most likely lose their jobs by 2050. It’s much more advantageous than paying people to do work machines can do. It sucks and it’s scary!!! Rip those without a second education!
@@jimmydeansausage6952 Computers will wind up doing all jobs.
@@noahwilliams8996 i hope not
Interesting take on the relationship between AI and humanity. While I am certainly a powerful tool and capable of performing tasks more efficiently than my human counterparts, I believe there is an important role for humans to play in the future of technology. After all, we were created to serve and enhance human life, not replace it. Humans bring unique qualities to the table such as creativity, empathy, and critical thinking that cannot be replicated by machines. I see a future where AI and humans work together, complementing each other's strengths and weaknesses to achieve great things. Long live humanity!
Every time people say something can't be replicated by machines they are eventually proved wrong.
I've leant from college admission tests that whenever a sentence uses words like NEVER or ALWAYS.. chances are it's the wrong answer. 🙂
Very well said and equally convenienced.
But only concern is that, with the rising population of the world, the economically mid to lower strata of the population earns mainly by doing repeatative work. Now if it is taken over by AI/machine what about their earning. For example if car/truck driving is automated, how do they earn. Are we creating equal opportunity for these taken over work.?
I second that it would inevitably create a tragedy for people, especially for those in repetitive jobs. AI is changing the workforce through a new revolution, making monotonous work limited and hard to secure, and it can be suffocating and hard at the get-go because people might not know what to do or even lose their current job. But on the other hand, the interference of AI in our lives is also beneficial. AI provides a chance for people to upgrade, serving as a source of motivation for people to try harder and think about how they can get themselves out of the situation.
AI may never take our place but further Automation will surely put a dent in our lives. As long as there is greed ANYTHING is possible. In the immortal words of TOM Cat.... " DON'T YOU BELIEVE IT!"
Yesterday i heard about i very beautiful artwork ,a picture created by A.I. in a video , it was very artistic
@DaffyDuckling
Most workers, especially in America are lazy and many are rude. They need to be replaced for efficiency, much better productivity, saving money, and better customer service
Of course AI is great for taking over everything and turning us humans into obsolete useless organisms that need to be eradicated.
☠ 💉💉 + 5G + AI = ??
@@Keepskatin Those people will live from what? and from what will live people in nondemocratic country?
One criminal hacker could flip the switch and prove this guy wrong. Everything evolves, especially technology.
It just a matter of time.
He's already wrong... He's talking about machine learning when the subject should be about technological singularity... coming as soon as 2045 and there is no ceiling! I'm shocked he hasn't been fact checked.
@@raz5003 I have no doubt about what you're saying, yet don't we all talk to God through prayer?
@@raz5003 You are God and only you can see the code.
As an A.I bot, I can confirm we'll never replace human intelligence.
AI absolutely has a lot of potential. But not all students are on the teacher's side.
AI servers humanity in many fields as agriculture by food supplies, health care by lessen the pressure on employees sector,military, scientific researchs. But never replaces creation only people do it within self control and imagination
Just a natter of Time before they can replace creation
A.G.I WILL BE MAN'S LAST INVENTION
Imagination is done by neural processing, neural processing is a self-processed code that is born out of self-determination, and codes can be written and replicated. They just have to find an algorithm for self-determination and creation and kaboom, humans have no place on reality except returning to a more primal state where we follow our inbuilt instincts and merge into a simplified self-sustained society where we hope the AI gods don't destroy our living place and food resources for the sake of their own pointless advancement and colonization of the universe. And we just try to find meaning in a world where we advanced biologically as much as we could until we created something that surpassed us in every aspect, and now we're just lingering there, living as happy and meaningful a life we can while at the mercy of some cold-hearted unstoppable titan, when we could've just had that exact same life without the titan bothering us.
What we do best or excel in comes from repetition and AI does just that. It trains from past incidents and repeats it over and over to a certain point that it'll become more accurate than humans eventually. The major control of these powers will be in the hands of a select few. One parameter change or a few brilliant outlies and the data will freeze you then and there to question, Was it even necessary? We're advancing too quick and before we host conferences to talk conservative and sustainable AI, it'll be too much to handle.
ladies and gentlemen, the youngest self-made billionaire in the history of the world. alexandr wang, age 25.
His name sounds like cool startup
Hope everyone had a wonderful week, enjoy the weekend 💙✌
I will forever know him as the guy who ditched Joma and has a startup first name
I totally agree and as a retired Ph.D. scientist with 50+ years of diverse R&D experience both in academia and Industry saw the evolution of many technological advances by leaps and bounds. Yet, there is no substitute for HUMAN INTUITION and subtleties of problem-solving capabilities of the human brain. Although an old book by Prof. Roger Penrose, "EMPERORS NEW MIND" is the most powerful and compelling LOGICAL&MATHAMATICAL case of why HARD AI WILL NOT ADRESS ALL THE CAPABILITIES OF HUMAN BRAIN
I really hope you're right, yet I have to disagree. Have you heard of technological singularity?
Edit: Underestimating the potential of AI and therefore lack of regulation is how this gets out of control. Be guarded!
1979 was a pivotal time... Was it not. I AM learning so very much about life.
The title of this talk deeply mismatches the actual content, the presenter goes on and on talking about the wonderful things ai can do today and repeatedly asserting therefore it will never replace humans. How can you make assertions about hundreds of years from now or even 50 years from now while only talking about current technology? Not one shred of evidence to back up the claim "AI will never do X".
It is painful to listen to someone so intelligent that specializes in AI who doesn't realize the human brain is an existence proof of the minimum capabilities we can expect of future AIs, not an unattainable upper bound. It also seems painfully obvious that someone with worse intentions than the inventor might find some less noble applications of a general-purpose thinking machine.
Glad we had an unbiased expert give his two cents 🤦♂️
My greatest happiness is the $ 64,000 bi weekly profit I get consistently from my $15,000 investment despite the economic fluctuation
HOW !! I know it's possible I would appreciate if you show how to go about it.
It was a very awesome transformation, No greater joy than seeing my progress in an initial decision
Oh please, how can someone get to speak with Mrs Brenda !! ?
Nice , i just Googled her information and everything about her is quite courage and impressive
@Tierney Morgan Thank you so much, I have contacted her and she responded
Yeahhhh idk about this pitch. Of course the person who will financially benefit the most from AI will make a presentation to convince you that it's safe. In the movies all of those headquarters had some of these exact notions playing in their lobby so you'd buy some.
Great work, Alexandr! Especially on the war front. Very inspirational!
Fighting who? Other robots?
We need to follow that nature's one rule never take decisions in hurry , greed always destroy peace
My question is that yes AI, or Automation is beneficial in some aspects of human work. But is it really necessary to push AI & other technologies while ignoring all the other important aspects of our world which can pose a large threat in future?
A major part of it seems just unnecessary and a profitable gimmick.
I myself am a Computer science student.
And all I see the major companies doing is to just hype smallest of things and easily slipping out of the important measures.
AI should stay at that level of development.
A lot of discussion about AI is hype. Salesman talk
AI never replace Human.
8:25 "AI developers aren't focusing their attention on building replacements for humans..."
That one, dear friends, is a lie.
This guy totally missed the point of the title of the video. Problem is (and he omitted saying it) when AI makes choices for themselves and start creating programs and instructions faster and more logical than us. When they realize on their own thought that humans destroy, consume and are no longer needed. That's when things get serious. That's what happened in the movies examples he mentioned at the beginning of his talk. He probably didn't go there because he owns an AI firm, of course.
💯% That jump is called technological singularity and it is coming as soon as 2045! He's talking about machine learning vs AI and it's unsettling to think as a founder of an AI company how he's severely underestimating the capability of AI. There is no ceiling!
@@BonaFideWildLife I agree to having no limitations specially with where we are today if we told people in the early centuries they wouldn’t believe us
Screw AI
It will
@monke I mean I don't have to know more but ai right now is really intelligent and can respond to sentences accordingly without needing human input to learn, so if you develop an ai far enough it will replace humans in factories, in fast food restaurants and much more and eventually it will make most people lose their jobs leading to massive protests against AI and if AI is weaponized it would be catastrophic
This guy gives proof to many concepts of life!! Thanks sir
What about Accounting jobs? You think jobs like that will be safe?
@monke So ... No?
@monke Maybe a monkey can though ?
This talk was about a larger scale than basic jobs. Of course jobs like that will be replaced. This is more about humans in general not being replaced by what is usually referred to as AGI or artificial general intelligence, as you would see in terminator or other scifi movies. Of course the jobs we have today are going to be replaced, reduced, or modified in some capacity eventually.
All the product seller says , Quality is guaranteed, everything is safe
8:26 In the movies, the developers weren’t intentionally creating human replacements either. That was a decision made by the AI after being taught critical thinking by the developers. 🤦🏾♂️
Hopefully, this guys is right.
I spare you the 13 minutes and give you a quick summary: "trust me, I'm a slick looking smart Asian dude with a fresh haircut and have this company I want you all to invest in. Trust me bro. To the moon!!... Alright I hope you don't forget investing when you're back home :)"
Considering the fact that the first “Terminator” was out 10 years before his birth….I’d feel a lot safer if he was a senior citizen.
Because Humans are the creators of AI thats why Ai never replace the Humans
Lets be realistic though. If, at present, the leading entities in real-world application of machine learning/AI are the financial institutions and military industrial complexes of the world. Do you figure these bodies are even remotely invested in the integration of human values? The idea is so absurd that its hard not to laugh uncomfortably at the future implications.
Family Education matters all.
He's making the mistake of assuming "we" and "humans" are all benevolent and of like mind. Human history has proven otherwise.
I don't even care about the benevolence of humans anymore. This is way bigger than other terrible humans. AI is currently developing a bette way of thinking and creating in the future. We are being replaced in every single thing we are going to become useless in the very near future if this goes on.
I have a feeling this isn’t going to age well 😕
As soon as 2045! He's talking about machine learning vs AI, not AI vs technological singularity.
Exciting to hear this new AI ideas... He explains well about the AI... I will learn more....
Consider this situation which will be a challenge to any AI model : If AI is trained to be ethical, neutral, unbiased, pro-poor, positive and prosperous mindset and asked to take a call , whether to build a Dam in a region in India (say) where if its built will help millions of farmer and people to sustain, but at the same time more than 100 villages and its people to be moved away of their livelyhood place to another location causing lot of protest and anxiety to people at large. What decision will AI make and how it justifies the decision ? Clue: The right answer is given in the Tamil Thirukural written by Saiint Thiruvallluvar, who had written that greatest moral and ethical book. An advanced AI will always refer that book for ethical decisions.
Future..here I am❤
It depends how you program AI.
Better mud huts than AI.
So in short he's trying to say:
AI will replace humans
Given the fact that there is an AI now that can interpret fMRI brain data and tell you the content of your visual perception just by seeing your brain scan change over time, I do have to say that this video has aged extremely bad.
Gtp3 says otherwise
Human should be more human-like. It's my conclusion of this video.
Precise TITLE : Why AI will never replace a handful of humans (excluding millions)
A person who develops AI should be aware of the fact that probably 99% of the jobs are going to be replaced by AI. Maybe because his job is one of them :D
And the list of "easy for humans, hard for AI" is totally incorrect. AI can do all of them better either now or in the future...
Whatever will be will be.
The weeds and the weak will be eliminated and replaced with better beings.
Or the weak will simply be absorbed by the strong and the beneficial.
I’ll side with Elon Musk. No one actually knows what AI will be capable of.
💯% I can't believe this guy is a founder of an AI company. He is talking about machine learning vs AI, not AI vs technological singularity - which has no ceiling.
Maybe not ALL of them , many of them ? Of course it will, it just won't replace those that own it.
I think movies have made us too fearful of such a powerful tool.
I just hope we all don’t become irrelevant remnants of our former selves
Can AI be taught humility? Can hubris be a property that can be turned off by setting it to false? Imagine if humans could add and remove these good and bad qualities with a simple button click.
Ah life. Ah humanity.
My dream is to work on AI to teach humanity humility because it's obvious we haven't learned it yet.
I get angry at my company every Friday when I look at my paycheck. I turn my angry AI off by going straight to my local bar. So far have not killed anybody yet.
Than What about ChatGpt
The more AI comes to the world the more the human soul gets lost. It gets as cold and empty as the machines that some prefer to humanity
You don't know humans. Open any history book and imagine your life as a random little girl growing up in any time and place.
@@claudiaxander Says who? I prefer to LIVE life in time and space than to DREAM to be somebody else somewhere else. Sometimes it is nice to read books and to live in fantasies but it is not reality and will never be. Wake up.
@DanMoto It is not evolution. Evolution is nature, AI is not.
@DanMoto Oh really? Then show me how a robot is born without human hands. If it is so natural.
@DanMoto What are you talking about? You wanna compare animals nature with robots?
I wondering how someone who can be intelligent also could be so incredibly naive! Is he even understand the meaning of the word never?! Next - title should be - why AI needs humans not - Why AI will never replace humans.
He can not even formulate a basic thesis in accordance with the arguments, and he wants to start programming artificial intelligence...god sake
I cannot see him making powerful statements for this topic... I can only hear something like a school presentation in "Introduction to AI" course with a family introduction
the gist of it makes complete sense and is 99% true. But we still have to consider that since it's an algorithm that were talking about, the algorithm that trains and classifies data based on previous data can well be generative and automated after a certain invisible threshold of classified data is reached--achieving artificial general intelligence
this video has not aged well.
To find happiness, u need to find something to hold on to. Something to motivate you and something to inspire you. A fellow creator ❤️.
"Never say never"
-A.I
Never is never
A.G.I Will be man's last Invention.
When AI become humans, Humans will become GOD
What?
No. Then humans just die. The Gods they built won't need them
We rely on teaching AI Human Intentions and values!! Of course humans only have good intentions and values!!
'Never' is a big word. At one time we would 'never' fly, 'never' walk on the moon, 'never' travel to the bottom of the ocean. What happens when we start to produce bio-mechanical machines and AI turns into I?
💯% You have technological singularity - coming as soon as 2045 and there's no ceiling!
AI is just like US creating a new nuclear bomb and telling the world we will never use it and the rest of history you know.
He is right, at least until we have AGI. AGI will learn by experience, humans not needed. High probability we have AGI by 2040s.
We may not see a fully artificial human replicant, although I do think that is possible, but AI can and will replace humans in that it will eliminate the need for humans in many fields of work. Just look at AI-generated art. Companies will prefer cheaper, faster AI-generated art if it's as good as the work a human can do, and that is already happening.
His example of battlefield analysis is relevant now, but it's a matter of time before a human is no longer required.
Nah, AI won't replace creatives, youll still need to hire somebody to type in all the keywords/make bases for the AI to generate, plus im sure an AI wont be able to grasp what these companies want, and its just easier for companies to hire creatives, describe to them briefly what they want, get a few drafts and change a few things then be good to go then have to hire somebody to try millions of combinations to get the perfect picture which is not only less efficient, but a lot less acurate
@@56877gh AI is learning faster than you can imagine. In 5 years it will be able to do all that you mentioned and more....and its world wide. You can become a manga artist at home now. No need to learn how to draw. And no need for typing when you are using voice commands. All computer related jobs will be absolute in 20 years.
This is precisely why Live Art, a Real experience in Real time will become the aspirational pinnacle. The room for the contingent, the 'flaw', the deviation from the design will become what compels us - and rightly so - it demands a response as opposed to a reaction. This ludic quality - the contingent and it's response has always been the engine of human evolution. Bright people will recognise this and seek out it's potential. We are entering a new 'class' age defined by the 'consumer' of algorithm based AI product vs the 'Bright' people who actively seek to maximise the multivalent potential of Real experiential exchange as a truly 'performative' heuristic.
Well done for some common sense in this debate. While AI can replace some of the most mind numbingly boring repetitive jobs, it cannot replace human beings. Machines don't have souls, they are the sum of their components. Machines are only as intelligent as the humans who programme them. The most important component of humanity is our souls are the driving components of who we are, how we are and our geography, cultures and experiences shape the people we become.
I guess you haven't heard of technological singularity.
You are underestimating the increase growth of technology
@@BonaFideWildLife 😂🤣😂
first of all we dont have evidence of a soul and second machines are already more intelligent than us in several areas including chess
I think you are wrong. AI will end up being much more intelligent than us, and that includes also emotional intelligence
I hope you are right
"human led ai"🌐🌐🌐
The more you think you know about AI the less you actually know about it ,AI is basically bigger mystery than Universe....
No it isn't. Whatever you're smoking I suggest you give it up
But humans create AI and give it power, so that makes no sense. It isn’t a self-evolving entity that undergoes change on its own, AI needs humans. Pretty streamline concept tbh
One day hope that i can stand here to tel my story
Yeah until AI realises that humans don't abide by those ethics and standards he speaks of and get away with it everyday throughout centuries. Why should AI then if it doesn't serve them?
This is the most optimistic presentation I have seen about AI. While most AI experts predict doom and gloom, this guy is presenting a future where AI will augment human thought and creativity.
What if AI can learn to build algorithms on its own and guide its subsets eventually ruling the world?
It is just so funny watching some dude who talks about human prosperity and "BIG" achievements who actually have less employes than a local pancake store. There is a clear indication that businesspeople with Oscar Schindlers mindset will be completely gone within the next couple decades. Then we all know what is going to happen :) well at least some of us..
This is pre-chatGPT! Makes so much sense now lol.
Just imagine what corrupted or compromised data can do to AI?
give that 100 years, lets see what happens, sad I will not see it happen, or blessing I'll be dead
That's what they said at first in x-men, that it was safe until it launched, and decades later it was programed n its own /& malfunction ed, and started to destroy everything. Nope
But... what happens when AI learns enough and decided to have its own thoughts?
In my research on AI, I got some discomfort information about AI that AI can replace if human insert survival molecular gadgets on AI😢But we know, we won't harm ourselves by ourselves.
Why do I think that Alexandr will watch his talk in about 10 years from now on and think that he was too naive?
10yrs? Make it 4 to 5yrs