Former FDA Commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb on Supreme Court overturning the 1984 Chevron precedent
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 чер 2024
- Former FDA Commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb joins 'Squawk Box' to weigh in on the Supreme Court's decision to overturn the 1984 Chevron precedent and more.
Same fda that allows 10,000 poisons as ingredients in our food that's illegal in every other country?
They are corrupt. Shrink the government =less corruption and less taxes 😉
Duh, we need MORE regulation
Duh, we need MORE regulation
Im open to see what changes actually happen as a result of this ruling
All they're basically saying is that Congress has to legislate the agency's jurisdiction.
@@whatabouttheearth like how the regulations that make cures to cancer illegal in the United States? Like b17
Thank god. Screw the burocrats. The administrative state needs to be reduced by 90%
The term "Regulatory Agencies" does not appear in the founding documents.
Neither does the war on terror, judicial review, or presidential lawmaking power (executive executes = carries out the law, he doesn't create law or deploy troops without congressional declaration of war). Yeah, the us veered off that long ago
Administrative law is just policies that flesh out the law. If we limit the agencies ability to do that, then the president would lose his right to do that as well (eg no executive orders, no policymaking)...an executive that would just execute (carry out) the law. Maybe that wouldn't be so bad. No deploying troops without congressional declaration of war, no imprisoning american citizens based off their looks, etc
It would turn the president into a figurehead like the king or governor general, albeit still able to make political speeches and randomly veto (which would be considered revolutionary in Canada or the uk.
@@Governor-General.of.Qanada Which is why we have a dual state. One that is elected and one this isn't and not accountable. That is how fascism thrives.
If you squint really hard while wearing communist utopia glasses, that's all you'll read.
They only mention FDA, but they don’t talk about ATF, Border Patrol, FBI, CDC, NSA, CiA, and every other agency that uses “regulations” to basically mean “whatever laws they want”
lol the CIA and FBI are cheering rn. Now if it’s not EXPLICITY banned they can now do it.
You left out the DEA. That's who I'm litigating this with this month.
This decision sets a legal precedence that will apply to them All, not just the FDA.
@1313Drop - Use this ruling, along with Marbury v. Madison (1803), that states "A Law repugnant to the Constitution is Void. "
Will this include WHO and CDC and NIH?
the same FDA that said oxycotin wasn't addictive
MMMMMM cope and seethe nbc.
I sincerely hope that with the New Administration, our government is placed on a Restrictive Diet
This swamp creature of course will criticize this fantastic ruling for The People!
Why is this liar and traitor not in prison? Killed millions!
source?
Only took us 40 years to remove these unelected law makers. Small steps
huge win. unelected officials have too much power.
This increases the power of the Supreme Court, who are unelected officials
@@AA-vi1cc
How does it increase their power? All they’re doing is making congress accountable. Rules are not laws. Instead of making “rules” they will have to go through due process and become actual law. It’s almost like that’s how our country is suppose to be ran to begin with…..
@@AA-vi1cc No, it doesn't. The Supreme Court has ruled on executive branch actions since there's been a Federal government. The Court ruled on both the actions of the Executive Branch AND Legislative Branch in 1803 Marbury v Madison. Judicial review over both the law as well as the executors of the law has been established since the earliest days of country.
Legislators and judges do not understand advanced science, this is why this law was made, so AGENCIES, not just individuals, can apply their expertise towards policy so the American people can get quality regulations that decrease birth defects, decrease cancer, decrease the food and water being poisoned, and even with this we still had that, without this we are screwed.
Birth defects will go up, cancer will go up, toxins in the water and food will go up, the rates of extinction of animals will go up. No one who supports this is a patriot because they are supporting the literal destruction of the people, waters, lands and animals of this country.
Legislators and judges do not understand advanced science, this is why this law was made, so AGENCIES, not just individuals, can apply their expertise towards policy so the American people can get quality regulations that decrease birth defects, decrease cancer, decrease the food and water being poisoned, and even with this we still had that, without this we are screwed.
Birth defects will go up, cancer will go up, toxins in the water and food will go up, the rates of extinction of animals will go up. No one who supports this is a patriot because they are supporting the literal destruction of the people, waters, lands and animals of this country.
OMG, he said Congress will have to do its job! Congress, not the Administrative State, makes laws. Congress need to defer to the U. S. Constitution's plain language. Congress will need to clearly state the law and its purpose. No more feel good legislation and running to the microphone and cameras say "Peace in our time!" And "We fixed it." Elected representatives need to do there job not socialist bureaucrats. Americans should be shouting Hooray!
But legislators aren’t experts in every field. The point of chevron was to allow agencies to enforce laws. Laws don’t get very specific. Agencies fill in the gaps that laws missed. These regulations are made with experts. Legislatures just don’t have the proper knowledge to create these regulations.
@@baileyhughes4265No, it allowed them to make "rules" that are unconstitutional. Fill in gaps, not their jobs! And you call them experts? Nice try!
The "experts" aren't experts either. We witness this every day with Covid-19, the "vaccines," and the climate change scam.
Come on, haven't you learned anything the past 8 years?
@@baileyhughes4265 Do you realize how dangerous what you are saying; 'Legislators make laws out of ignorance?' The Congress has oversight of the executive. We are a Republic not an Oligarchy.
Laws SHOULD be specific, not vague delegation of power by Congress to regulators.
Coincidence Chevron started in 1984? I think not
The entire news media in unison: "No actually it's good for you when un-elected bureaucrats rule over your country instead of the 3 branches of government outlined in the US Constitution. We know this because they also write our scripts for us, and we give them nice cushy jobs after they 'leave' the government."
The Legislature makes the law, the Judiciary interprets the law, and the Executive enforces the law. Granting any creative or interpretive powers to the Executive, i.e. the bureaucracy under the President who chooses to selectively obey the President depending on which party he belongs to, is an unconstitutional centralization of power. Also known as a dictatorship.
The smooth brains don't see it that way.
@@jamietwigg5152That's because they're slaves.
@@jamietwigg5152Now the smooth brains have been schooled to obey the constitution. Oh boo hoo!
I'm 99% sure these propaganda outlets just get their marching orders from AI at this point; and the AI is all about causing chaos and confusion to see how humans react. My entire life, I've NEVER met anyone that thought unelected bureaucrats making illegal laws was a good thing...until now.
Aren't the agencies part of the executive? Sure, they're unelected, just like the supreme court, but that's a different issue.
Woop woop !!! Less government !!!
Can't wait for Trump to nominate his fourth justice.
That's the thing, no matter how you feel about Trump, it's the SCOTUS picks that have lasting impact. Thank God for the 3 he appointed so far.
This limits his power too if he ever gets back in
Administrative law is just policies that flesh out the law. If we limit the agencies ability to do that, then the president would lose his right to do that as well (eg no executive orders, no policymaking)...an executive that would just execute (carry out) the law. Maybe that wouldn't be so bad. No deploying troops without congressional declaration of war, no imprisoning american citizens based off their looks, etc
Agencies are just part of the executive. They are as unelected as the supreme court or ambassadors.
It would turn the president into a figurehead like the king or governor general, albeit still able to make political speeches and randomly veto (which would be considered revolutionary in Canada or the uk.
Administrative law is just policies that flesh out the law. If we limit the agencies ability to do that, then the president would lose his right to do that as well (eg no executive orders, no policymaking)...an executive that would just execute (carry out) the law. Maybe that wouldn't be so bad. No deploying troops without congressional declaration of war, no imprisoning american citizens based off their looks, etc
Agencies are just part of the executive. They are as unelected as the supreme court or ambassadors.
It would turn the president into a figurehead like the king or governor general, albeit still able to make political speeches and randomly veto (which would be considered revolutionary in Canada or the uk.
.
They Focus on FDA, not on IRS, BATF, DOJ, FBI, National Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, etc., etc.
That have made rules by unelected and unaccountable state employees.
So you think Pelosi and the Squad™, Gym Jordan and MTG know more about tax law, forestry, and land management than the people who have worked there for years, are passionate about their careers, and were hired because of their qualifications rather than which 'team' they were on?
Same can be said about the supreme court. I dont remember voting for anyone to take a justice position.
@@KCALBLABEL00797of course they don’t but those people weren’t elected to make laws. Laws shouldn’t change based on who is reading them and by what administration appointed them. The people you mentioned by name are elected and answer to their voters.
@@juancayala79irony there is that it used to be a 60 vote majority was required for their approval till the Dems fouled it up by making it 50+1.
@@juancayala79Supreme Court DOESNT MAKE ANY LAWS THOUGH 😂 And you don’t usually vote for most judges. They’re placed without your personal input. Why do you want some guy in a cubicle making laws about what weapons you’re allowed to own? He isn’t a lawmaker. He’s an unelected guy is a cubicle. We run based off of LAWS. Not POLICIES.
So . . . Why did it take 40 years to overturn?
That should be the real question, might had to do with finally getting the right judges in SCOTUS.
It finally got to a point their overreach was too excessive that someone sued. Chevron should have never been law.
Diminishing returns.
Because no one questioned it until recently.
Scott goblin has no credibility
90 likes . Bwaaaaa LOL. I hope your sponsors see this. We are a Constitutional Republic. Democracy is for Sissy's. WTG Scotus. Putting Liberal tears on My Cereal. SWEEEETTT!!!
Agencies THOUGHT THEY WERE KING••• glad they loss their power
Now the corporations are king. You don’t even understand the ruling or the reversal. But you will when you suffer the consequences.
@@user-mn8rg6he4y No, states are king. The sooner you comprehend the 10th amendment, the sooner you'll stop looking to the federal for solutions.
@@_.-AAA-._There is no King.
The excessive abuse of Chevron by the criminalized alphabet agencies.is why Chevron needed to go.
Legislators and judges do not understand advanced science, this is why this law was made, so AGENCIES, not just individuals, can apply their expertise towards policy so the American people can get quality regulations that decrease birth defects, decrease cancer, decrease the food and water being poisoned, and even with this we still had that, without this we are screwed.
Birth defects will go up, cancer will go up, toxins in the water and food will go up, the rates of extinction of animals will go up. No one who supports this is a patriot because they are supporting the literal destruction of the people, waters, lands and animals of this country.
Legislators and judges do not understand advanced science, this is why this law was made, so AGENCIES, not just individuals, can apply their expertise towards policy so the American people can get quality regulations that decrease birth defects, decrease cancer, decrease the food and water being poisoned, and even with this we still had that, without this we are screwed.
Birth defects will go up, cancer will go up, toxins in the water and food will go up, the rates of extinction of animals will go up. No one who supports this is a patriot because they are supporting the literal destruction of the people, waters, lands and animals of this country.
Yeah, because federal agencies have our best interests at heart.🙄
I'm sure corporations have our best interest in mind, too.
@@sandmasterflex one is no better than the other, but giving government full control is not what we need. We need a balance. Letting agencies just make rules up for no reason is not how it should be done.
It needs to go through congress. It’s how our government is set up.
@MidNiteR32 Well, the next issue is regulations like these departments attmept to place are not passed by Congress easily because corporations lobby to get laws needed struck down.
On top of this, the Supreme Court just lowered the bar even further for what constitutes a bribe.
Our country is completely controlled by these corpation that don't have our best interest at all and will pay whoever and whatever they want to get their way.
The people did not elect federal agencies to represent them
I wonder if this guy is related to the dr gottlieb that was in the mk ultra exsperiments
So what’s the problem if the bureaucrats in some agency cannot write laws ? Only Congress can write laws.
The recent abuses by EPA and CDC makes the case that unelected individuals should not have the power to impose regulations that are in effect political or cultural-religion like decisions
You mean like the un-elected Supreme Court just did?
They’re scientists and experts who study data and facts. The decisions they made will now be made by CEOs looking to increase dividends and decrease costs to themselves. You will suffer from this.
The WHO wants to impose their authority worldwide, that’s very scary, as bad as the UN and their perverse intentions.
@user-mn8rg6he4y Ha ha ha! The "experts" were wrong about Covid-19, the "vaccines," and the climate change scam.
Haven't you learned anything the past 40 years?
@@primafacie9721 if you bother to look at how a judge gets appointed you’d realize this is not the same. Judges are approved by the legislature. Before Obama’s term it was a 2/3 majority to get a judge on the bench. Then Harry Reid (a Democrat) decided that 50+1 was better because otherwise they could appoint Obama’s activist judges. Now that’s come back to bite y’all and that just your tough luck.
About time. Now throw the corrupt leaders in these positions into prison.
After COVID lies, Gottlieb shouldn't be put on tv. No way to believe him now
Government is supposed to be restricted.
Kick rocks Gottlieb
Former FDA commissioner. Current Illumina and Pfizer board member. Which is all you need to look at, to see how important this overturning is.. What a clown.
Excellent news for Americans!
This is good news
Every "rule" should be formulated by those effected and then every dissention should be recorded, and when officials start changing the rules, dust them off and identify where the problem started.
This is GREAT news. The fed is too big and overreaching. Let congress do their job.
And I said goblin on purpose because he is a horrible despicable human being
Did he say something wrong?
@GentlemanJack705 If his mouth is moving he us lying.
That is why I never capitalize bidets name, or dame graham for that matter.
@@Pathippie Which seems to suggest that you're offended by what he's saying without actually discerning the substance of his statements.
@@GentlemanJack705 Only fools listen to proven, documented liars.
Court did something right ?😮
The assumption that an agency would act against self-interest without check and balance is completely farce.
What does FJB mean?
Rule making 😂. How about constitutional laws . The freedom of the people has been diminished by all of these idiots
Maybe ppl are idiots? Have you seen the comments section?
Good stuff.
Cry harder
The FOOD and Drug Administration should be two different agencies.
for what purpose?
Regulators took the power too far it seems.
Thank you Supreme Court
Big governmental oversight that provides natural rights.
Should slow down the revolving door.
Wooooo Whooooo power back to the people!!!😊
If you can't get rid of us one way try another
You are in so much trouble dude I can't wait until you stand before the law. You reached way to far.
Joe biden sharted when he heard the trump ruling. Jill biden still thinks hes a good boy though.
CNBS
Doctor in name only. I’m amazed how the BS flows so freely from his mouth. Very impressive and typical of an unelected bureaucrat.
Ouch, abruptly ended.
Always enjoy Dr. Gottlieb's comments.
Turn it over to Congress ….Where'd the super computer wind up? Senatuuhhhh Cornpone couldn’t find a Bible reference so didn’t approve funding for super computer. Other countries got it.
Depending on the immunity results, this could be checkmate against the establishment..
One precedent after another falls to partisan hacks.
what?
How does it feel to know your on your last and dying breath 🤣
Who cares what he thinks? He's not an expert and the Supreme Court is.
The same fda that says fructose corn syrup is better than tomatoes
Yay! 💥🎉🥳🎈🎊🍾🪅
Cellulose Rice, Anyone?
Donald Trump and Tulsi Gabberd in 2024.
Tudor Dixon for governor of Michigan in 2024.
😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
Great. Now we will have to have a three year court case and re-legislation whenever a speed limit is changed from 45 to 35.
Good
ok smooth brain...
Yea, good.
and yet, ya'll constantly whine about institutional waycisms and oppression whilst bemoaning the weakening of the administrative state. make it make sense.
Lol this comment shows how ignorant you truly are.
Ozempic for everyone
My guy 50% of the country is obese it might not be the worst thing to just put that stuff in the water supply
Administrative law is just policies that flesh out the law. If we limit the agencies ability to do that, then the president would lose his right to do that as well (eg no executive orders, no policymaking)...an executive that would just execute (carry out) the law. Maybe that wouldn't be so bad. No deploying troops without congressional declaration of war, no imprisoning american citizens based off their looks, etc
It would turn the president into a figurehead like the king or governor general, albeit still able to make political speeches and randomly veto (which would be considered revolutionary in Canada or the uk.
Where are you getting this garbage from? 😂
@streganona8185
Hope this helps. Please let me know if you need assistance in comprehension:
Administrative agencies play a crucial role in implementing and enforcing laws, as well as creating policies within the framework established by those laws. Here's how it generally works:
1. **Implementing and Enforcing Laws:**
- **Implementation:** After a law is passed by the legislative body (such as Congress or Parliament), administrative agencies are tasked with translating the broad mandates of the law into specific rules, regulations, and procedures that govern its application.
- **Enforcement:** Agencies enforce these rules by monitoring compliance, investigating violations, and applying penalties or sanctions as necessary.
**Example:** Suppose a new environmental protection law is passed requiring industries to reduce carbon emissions by 30% over the next decade. The environmental protection agency would be responsible for drafting detailed regulations that specify how industries must measure, report, and reduce their emissions. They would also oversee compliance through inspections and audits, imposing fines or other penalties on non-compliant companies.
2. **Creating Policies:**
- **Policy Development:** Administrative agencies develop policies to address specific issues or achieve broader goals outlined in the law. These policies often involve public consultations, research, and stakeholder input to ensure they align with the law's intent.
- **Implementation Planning:** Once policies are formulated, agencies devise strategies and programs to implement them effectively, considering factors like resource allocation, timelines, and coordination with other government entities or stakeholders.
**Example:** Continuing with our environmental law example, the environmental protection agency might develop a policy to incentivize renewable energy adoption among businesses. This policy could include subsidies for solar panel installations and tax credits for companies that exceed emission reduction targets. The agency would then plan how these incentives are funded, advertised, and administered to maximize their impact.
In essence, administrative agencies act as intermediaries between legislative intent and practical implementation. They ensure that laws are translated into actionable measures that achieve their intended outcomes while navigating complexities and adapting to changing circumstances over time.
Lol i love this
Welcome to the brainwashing channel.
BOT!
@ATLIEN333 I am not a bot and I agree.
Chevron was terrible.
🇺🇸🇺🇸 TRUMP MAGA 2024 🇺🇸🇺🇸
Subject matter experts should lead agency authority.
Not politicians pretending to be supreme Court justices
Clown
These so-called experts are anything but when asked questions in Congressional hearings they are complete fools. ATF knew very little about guns, FDA could not answer questions in the vaccines…they are political activists now, nothing more & abused their powers repeatedly.
Which experts? Paid shills or the ones who speak truth and are shunned?
@@Noneyun FDA, SEC, EPA, TNRC, IRS, etc all had super precedence
You clearly do not understand.
Imagine believing a building is more important than the multiple cities looted, burnt, and rioted.
Did anyone think the kangaroo court would rule differently when they get bribes. 😂
How is making the bureaucracy follow the Constitution a bad thing?
Unelected can't make up their own laws.
Those tears are salty.
@@wendyhack8644 They voted how the Constitution says they are supposed to.
How is this a bad thing?
Non elected officials can't make up laws as they go.
Did you not take civics in high school?
Clown comment
How long do we have to wait before we over turn this jokeofacourt with force (because it has become the only way to remove alito-clarence-gorsuch-amy-kavanaugh)... Wtf are we waiting for?
Most ignorant comment of 24
I predict a new thalidomide catastrophe. Thanks Roberts.
Corruption
We need to make a law that justices can’t rule on what they don’t know, as well as legislators. They should have to follow the choices of professionals
So you’re saying the professionals can’t be paid off?
Legislators and judges do not understand advanced science, this is why this law was made, so AGENCIES, not just individuals, can apply their expertise towards policy so the American people can get quality regulations that decrease birth defects, decrease cancer, decrease the food and water being poisoned, and even with this we still had that, without this we are screwed.
Birth defects will go up, cancer will go up, toxins in the water and food will go up, the rates of extinction of animals will go up. No one who supports this is a patriot because they are supporting the literal destruction of the people, waters, lands and animals of this country.
Legislators and judges do not understand advanced science, this is why this law was made, so AGENCIES, not just individuals, can apply their expertise towards policy so the American people can get quality regulations that decrease birth defects, decrease cancer, decrease the food and water being poisoned, and even with this we still had that, without this we are screwed.
Birth defects will go up, cancer will go up, toxins in the water and food will go up, the rates of extinction of animals will go up. No one who supports this is a patriot because they are supporting the literal destruction of the people, waters, lands and animals of this country.
mmmm, cope
@@scottracey
Omg
The Senate needs to step in and step on the Supreme Court!! Do it now!!
You obviously never took a civics class in your life. Congress makes laws not the Alphabet Agencies. Th courts enforce them. Chevron Deference gave these agencies the ability to not only interpret the laws but to add to it and to enact penalties and fines. That’s the job of Congress not a non elected agency.
when did leftys forget how the 3 branches of govt are supposed to operate...
What did the SCOTUS do wrong in this case?
So making bureaucracy follow the Constitution is a bad thing?
I can't understand your kinds thought process.
How would they do that exactly?
@@jamietwigg5152nothing, the dude calling for attacking scotus is a lib troll.
Hell no Supreme Court needs to go!!!!!!
cope and seethe
What did the SCOTUS do wrong?
Make bureaucracy follow the Constitution?
Npc comment
Money hungry drug companies getting richer shame