Supreme Court overturns 40-year landmark decision, limiting federal agencies' power
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 чер 2024
- The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 Thursday to overturn a 40-year-old decision that had given federal agencies broad regulatory power, curtailing the agencies' ability to enforce regulations. Former federal prosecutor Scott Fredericksen joined CBS News to discuss the decision and attorney and CBS News campaign reporter Katrina Kaufman has more on the cases still on the court's docket.
#news #supremecourt #politics
CBS News 24/7 is the premier anchored streaming news service from CBS News and Stations that is available free to everyone with access to the internet and is the destination for breaking news, live events, original reporting and storytelling, and programs from CBS News and Stations' top anchors and correspondents working locally, nationally and around the globe. It is available on more than 30 platforms across mobile, desktop and connected TVs for free, as well as CBSNews.com and Paramount+ and live in 91 countries.
Subscribe to the CBS News UA-cam channel: / cbsnews
Watch CBS News 24/7: cbsnews.com/live/
Download the CBS News app: cbsnews.com/mobile/
Follow CBS News on Instagram: / cbsnews
Like CBS News on Facebook: / cbsnews
Follow CBS News on X: / cbsnews
Subscribe to our newsletters: cbsnews.com/newsletters/
Try Paramount+ free: paramountplus.com/?ftag=PPM-0...
For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com
Seriously cutting Federal Agency power is one of the best things the Supreme Court has ever done! The American people have the power, not Federal agency bureaucrats! Thank you Supreme Court for reestablishing the power of the people and cutting the swamp rat’s power. We the people elect Representatives who we want to make laws…not bureaucrats using rules in place of laws!
Congress won't fix most of the problems when they keep getting in greater gridlock.
The fact that they've had to put the ATF in their place over, and over, and over in recent years, is all you needed to see to know this was coming.
None of the news agencies mention atf when it comes to this story either. Big win for 2A
How is the govt going to regulate and control AI? Youre so worried about your gun rights you forgot about your rights to not be controlled by a machine. They’re already stealing people’s ID’a and there’s ZERO controls. This is a disaster.
The courts, who have judges who don’t have email are going to be the triers of truth on AI cases? Jesus Christ. SCOTUS doesn’t even know what they did. No mention of it.
How is the govt going to regulate and control AI? Youre so worried about your gun rights you forgot about your rights to not be controlled by a machine. They’re already stealing people’s ID’a and there’s ZERO controls. This is a disaster.
Hey everybody. Put aside your MAGA/Liberal labels. They just gave all power over AI to the judiciary.
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
That take ATF power away!!! Yea
If all you can think of is your arms, you need to wake up ASAP, kiddo.
Radon gasses will expand into more homes and soil, food will mutate, water will have more microplastics that cause cancer, the air will become more polluted because of a lack of regulation. Food quality will drop. Disease will soar.
Open your mind. Don't be so narrow.
They need to take away the powers these rouge agencies have to just do whatever they want to with whoever they seem to want to
It's not "siding with conservatives," constraining the scope and power of the government to its constitutional limits.
Favorite claim of government cabal.
Progressives were against Chevron when Trump was in office.
This ruling says that CONGRESS must make the laws not the administrative agencies!
Corporations will take care of the people lol
Yes it is! This helps out corporations and big industry, of course it sides with the corrupt Conservatives.
In no world except your imagination does this reduce the government’s power. It centralizes it, and makes it easier to be controlled by a select few individuals.
The EPA cotrolling every wash, dry gully,cow pond, is the reason they don’t need to be able to do this ! Creating wetlands out of land farmed for 50 years or more ! This is ridiculous and what happens when agencies go unchecked !
Awww! You really think this is for your benefit...precious.
@@Here4TheHeckOfIt that’s what you don’t understand. It’s not for an individual benefit, it is for freedom for all.
@@Here4TheHeckOfItout of curiosity, who do you think benefits most from this?
@@ronjones1414corporations who will now lobby the courts so they can get what they want since majority of regulations will now be up to debate. This combined with Citizens United which worsened Lobbying with SCOTUS now saying that the courts can receive “gifts” is definitely not in favor of the people.
Just because congress writes a law it doesn`t mean that law is constitutional.The reason why some laws enacted by congress are ambiguous is because some might be unconstitutional and this is the way to get around that fact.The Fed has a lot of resources for court proceedings if laws are challenged. They can put on a beat down.
Barely been seeing this, almost like they don’t want most people to be aware
Yeah, this is the huge one. A lot more power just went to the conservative super majority supreme court.
@@Vile_Oreo No it did not. Power went back to the people, as in congress.
It went straight to corporations. Not the people. @@mikefowler301
@@mikefowler301 Congress is nowhere near a representation of the people and the last decade or so proves that. Chevron being overturned is one of the hugest SCOTUS rulings of all time and not in a good way. It's a "keys to the kingdom" level ruling and I'm sick of it being underplayed.
@@mikefowler301 You'll see.
Along with the EPA the ATF also needs to be reigned in. ATF has been changing standing laws with new definitions and regulations contrary to the laws that Congress passed.
This abolishment of the Cheveron doctrine just took that away from the ATF.
Good, now lets start drilling and bring those prices down.
Helping to destroy the 4th branch of government!!!
No not responsible for law, To keep civil servants from CREATING more law.
How about judges making new laws?
@@sleepinglady2778judges don't make laws either. Congress is the only body under the constitution, which can make laws.
Judges have also been making law, hence Roe V Wade was overturned.
Good! I agree with Gorsuch that if a law is ambiguous, toss the law and tell Congress to write a succinct and clear law.
Hmmm. Congress got nothing done the last 2 years. The courts just took all regulatory control over the entire country including the banks. So, SCOTUS ultimately right now controls all banking regulations. And at least 2 of them are bought by billionaires. Did SCOTUS just commit the coup today and were too busy watching Trump/Biden?
That's the problem congress won't pass news laws and then the courts basically do the job of the agencies in interpretation which is stupid.
@@ricardobarahona3939with unchecked power? Was this a coup? Did SCOTUS just take all of the power from the executive?
@@ricardobarahona3939 What new laws do we need? We have an immigration law p[assed in 1988 that the federal government completely ignores. What good would a new immigration law do? And the main problem is Congress is too lazy to bother to find out if its laws are good or bad. Like Barrycare, they pass a 2000 page law then tell faceless, unelected bureaucrats to "make it so." The loss of your doctor or your plan was NOT in the law, some faceless, unelected bureaucrats decided that Americans should have their plans taken away.
@@odysseus2656 That's more a problem with Congress never being able to fix healthcare then any bureaucrats decision.
GOOD
Good for the supreme Court for doing the right thing.
And what would that be?
Return the rule of law to the courts.
@@tonyburzio4107 Doesn't that require competency?
@@lextacy2008ruling against you 😂😂😂
@@suntzu94 Against the working class? Is that your take? Do you realize this ruling will increase your housing costs, your food? Do you realize this ruling will also force you to install your own water treatment plant in your home....that is if you want a shower. Are you still going to go that route?
Headlines like this seem to already entail an attempt to frame the narrative. While it is always of some significance when a longstanding precedent is overturned, it is hardly the entire story of the case. And it seems a bit telling that even the overturning of Roe was met with more neutral-sounding headlines, perhaps providing a window into what the powers-that-be deem most important (in this case, it seems it may be that power itself).
This is state media, doing what state media does.
Now days this agancies have lost their way and have abuse their power
Like the Supreme Court?
😘😘😘@@BakedApple989
@@BakedApple989 The Supreme Court is not an agency. Learn your words.
@@BakedApple989Uh, SCOTUS isn’t an agency, but an equal branch of our government.
@@BakedApple989aww look at the sheeple that doesn't know the constitution
"limiting" federal agencies to FOLLOWING THE LAWS AS WRITTEN, not having unelected political appointees and their hand selected employees making crap up out of the nowhere!
You putting your faith in judges over actual experts. Also Laws have vague language for a reason, so that they are more resilient and not force congress to pass hyper-specific laws that would already be blocked by gridlock.
@@ricardobarahona3939 these people are not experts. They are bureaucrats with a tremendous amount of power. That power will corrupt pretty much anyone who walks the earth, except for Jesus. The bureaucracy and government, have become a tool to deliver favors to insiders. Your faith and government will destroy us all.
good, rein in the corruption
Actually, this will create more corruption. This isn’t a win for the American people. I suggest you research what this is about before cheering it on.
Name the corruption.
@@donjohnson1578 thats the whole problem with corruption, it cant be named because it is the effect of relying on deference to agency discretion
@@colinwithonel So you don't have any examples. Why am I not surprised?
@@donjohnson1578 because you are uneducated about the nature of bureaucracy
This is a great ruling. A huge win for the people. All limits put on the administrative state is a good thing.
Huge win for the Rich you mean. Get used to an even lower standard of living otherwise in a polluted hell scape.
@RedRocket4000 where did you hear that? 😂 You are just making stuff up to he extreme
@RedRocket4000 You always buy in to the rich scheme. These agencies and other government officials are VERY RICH! They will never tax the rich...because they secretly go after the middle class.
He heard it from the DNC e-mail that came out after the verdict. Cut and paste.
@@RedRocket4000 you have it backwards. Your statement presumes the government government will raise your standard of living, that is laughable. Did the government provide the capital and organization so that you can be hired to be productive in our economy? Did the government provide you with shelter? Does the government provide you with food? no no the government gets in the way of progress. Government needs to shrink drastically so freedom could be had by the people.
Bravo! 👏
After this week, I'd think the Court's majority will face a difficult decision: whether to replace, on the front of the Supreme Court building, the words "Equal Justice Under Law" with the words "Open for Business," "Might makes Right," or "Plutocrats Only."
SO MUCH HAS TO BE CHANGE, THATS NOT LAW.!!!😊
The federal government should not have that kind of power in the first place.
It doesn't, hence the point of the ruling.
The courts should? At least we vote for the administration who runs those agencies. They just gave all regulatory powers to ultimately SCOTUS. They gave themselves huge overarching power.
People with lifetime appointments just took all regulatory power in the United States. And at least 2 of them are on the take from billionaires. This is the beginning of the end of our democracy.
This is such a bad decision for conservatives too but they don’t even realize it (yet). The courts now control regulations over banks. Just thought about that.
So SCOTUS has regulatory control over all of the banks right now. Did they just execute the coup? Was Biden/Trump the distraction.?
The government must revert to its 1960 size.
My question to you why 1960? There were approximately 179.3 millions Americans in 1960, while there was approximately 333.2 million of Americans in 2022. Don't you think given the significant increase in the number of Americans that additions laws and regulations may be required to govern such an increase? So if you're comfortable with going back to 1960, then you must be comfortable with smog, air pollution, voting gerrymandering, housing and racial segregation. These are the things that will "Make America Great Again." You know, the good old days. Let me add that my 99 year old grandmother recalled that she lived through those times, and they were not "great!"
@AlexanderWinterborn To what? 90% top marginal rate? Did you know that from 1945-1960 the USA had no global economic competition because we had bombed our competitors out of existence? And yet, we had 5 recessions in 15 years. JFK cutting income taxes caused recessions to get spaced further apart, because Governments cause recessions.
@@SuperOdyss You realize there were several international trade wars after World War 2? In addition to the MANY countries that literally ceased to exist or split up? THE ENTIRE WORLD went through economic turmoil during that period of time, and that means EVENTUALLY our economy would suffer by proxy. Hence the delay, in addition to funding the COLD WAR.
You want burning rivers and the rich to take all.
@@SuperOdysscutting taxes doesn't cause recessions, government spending does. Just like it caused inflation.
How did our country survive before the fed?
Chevron Doctrine: If the statute is ambiguous, the agency decides what Congress meant which means, we do what is in the best interest of whatever ideology is controlling the government. Guess what kids, the government doesn’t exist to benefit the people, it exists to benefit itself. Once regulation is created, it’s damn near impossible to change it without a court order!
Doesn’t the Supreme Court know that Government and its faceless bureaucrats always know best?
6 - 3, not a "strictly conservative" ruling.
Been a little disappointed with Barrett & Kavanaugh on some of their decisions this term. Roberts is a lost cause & might as well be considered liberal at this point.
There are 3 so-called liberal justices and 6 so-called conservative justices, so yeah, if the vote was 6-3 it was a strictly conservative ruling.
@@margo3367 you do realize that Barrett, Kavanaugh & Roberts joined the 3 “liberal” members of the court in an opinion just a couple days ago? So it was actually 6-3, but it wasn’t just the so called “conservative” justices. It was this, and several other recent opinions that I was referencing, & not this one specifically.
Law should be made in Congress &; not by government illiterates!!!
you mean lobbyists
"Democracy is when you force people to do what you want" - Liberals
Only elected persons to the legislature can make laws for me. Unelected bureaucrats can go on unemployment for all I care. Big daddy gubamint gonna go on a constitutional diet!!!!
So you like being abused by the Rich let the Rich do anything they want no matter much it hurts you.
Because corporations will have your best interests in mind lol
@@DaTooch_e "Only elected persons to the legislature can make laws for me." What does this have anything to do with corporations??
@@DaTooch_e , big daddy gubamint takin care of you?
@@rmpj13 as a matter of fact it does, and it takes care of you too.
who were the 3 of the 6-3 vote? you can guess...easily.
Jackson Kegan Sotomayor, three rich women protected by men with firearms.
@@savageinstitute9569I’m not even sure they’re women…
@@savageinstitute9569are they even women?
I know for a fact that 1 was never a judge in her life, 1 just opened her properties to the homeless, and 1 doesn't know what a woman is.
Wonderful ruling! Our federal agencies have overreached for far too long.
Example: CDC allowing people to not pay their rent
Nice! 😁👍
The supreme court in has given its self to much power over the laws.
Please read this. It is not a conspiracy. "All laws end now." Judges with out any expertise will now make all laws with out the expertise of any scientist or experts in their field.
Young people need to review the Supreme Court Chevron ruling radically altering the largest decision by the U.S. government with a power grab today. It is one of the most far reaching and disruptive rulings in the history of the court. Energy, Safety, Schooling, Food and Drug Safety, Labor, Consumer Finance, Environment, Finance, Health Care, Housing, Law, ect. All will be decided by the courts from now on instead of scientist and experts in those fields. We might want to ask ourselves what kind of world do politicians and corporations want to leave our world?
We need Impeachments. We need trump back . We need mandatory I'D, we need term limits
Mandatory ID like a dictatorship yep. You hate freedom.
Good, atf was overstepping on our constitutional rights. This is absolutely not a political win but instead a win for the people.
This has to be a deliberate downplay. Who cares about Orange Man Bad? Everything they didn't want him to do can't be done anymore. This is a move in the correct direction towards significantly reducing the power of POTUS and all Fed agencies.
Yeah, it's amazing how all the people screaming that Trump will be a dictator if he's reelected, don't want to take away all the powers that could make him a dictator!
@@africkinamerican That is an astute observation
Good limit them!!
I remember a canal river in Manhatten on fire in the 70s before the EPA made sure it stopped.
All things in their time.
No, you don't, it didn't happen there.
Sounds like a state issue.
And by the way, I think that was cleveland, not Manhattan
The less government regulation the better. I'd like it to get to 0 regulation but everyone has their dreams.
EPA has too much....Well maybe relaxing regulations on where *lead* can go just might be what this situation needs. ☺
The bums lose ! The bums lose !
Great news.
Great decision!
Reading the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution it`s no secret the federal government has been over reaching. All you have to look at is how many laws and rules instituted by the Federal government, imposed on the states come under the Interstate Commerce Clause of the Constitution.The legal gymnastics going on in the Federal court`s system is breathtaking.
Mace the Nation continues to put a moronic left-wing spin on everything they post.
This is a good start because the ATF has way to much power. Great work supreme court.👍🙏😁
This goes well beyond federal bureaucracy. It is ruled on the basis that bureaucracy cannot be trusted to point the direction legally on constitutional issues. So in essence, this has removed all state and local government power to use deference in making laws that are federal court jurisdiction...like anything that has to do with the 5th amendment and the 2nd amendment, etc...
Thank God!
When I was just 8 years old, my mom, my brother, and I found ourselves crossing a bridge over the Milwaukee River. We had recently moved from the warm embrace of North Florida to this new, unfamiliar place. As we walked, the stench of the river hit us like a wave. It was unbearable, reeking so badly that we all instinctively recoiled.
I looked up at my mom, eyes watering from the smell, and begged her to hurry so we could escape the odor. The look of discomfort and sadness on her face is etched into my memory, even though it was 58 years ago. I can still feel the cold air and hear the sound of the water beneath us, tainted by that awful smell. The sight of dead fish floating lifelessly on the river’s surface made it even worse, a haunting image that has stayed with me all these years.
It's a memory that lingers, one I wish I could erase. I hope with all my heart that you and your children never have to experience such a moment. No one should have a memory like that, seared into their minds forever.
Technology has now taken over so goodbye to pollution.
I gather this is in support of the power of the EPA. The problem isn't the regulation of pollution, it's that the court has to bend the knee to the regulatory agencies' rules in any case of controversy. They have overstepped their bounds so often, along with other agencies, it's time they had some oversight of their own.
Flint Michigan.
East Palestine Ohio.
Lahaina, Maui Hawaii.
Ask these people how (rich) Federal agencies failed them. Yet we're $35 Trillion in debt. Your descendants will be living in tents.
Vote blue and write exacting laws.
What kind of bulshit propaganda is this? For one thing, the Milwaukee River lies within the jurisdiction of local and state governments. It does not extend outside the state of wisconsin. Why is that the federal issue at all?
(by the way, even waters that touch one or more States need not be federally regulated, those can and should be regulated by interstate compact.)
Great call by the Supreme Court!! The federal bureaucracy has become far too overreacting.
ATF about to be removed as an agency. Every case is about to be appealed
Federal regulation however broad and overbearing is better than allowing corporations to buy access to the resources of this nation and pollute without regard to the effect on wildlife and the enjoyment of future generations. I'd rather have the federal regulation and oversight.
If they are taking something,where and who are they giving it to instead.
The future looks bright.
Says ruzzia
Yeah, cause a little salmonella never hurt anybody… Nobody really needs clean water either.
Liberals brain's exploding
@@4_EverLuckymaybe read the constitution and understand how it works
@mikem6997 you do realize that caring about the environment isn't a partisan issue, right?
Alito's corruption has exceeded that of Thomas! Thomas's interest lies in his wife's income from her leased land. The explanation is lengthy but is outlined in snippets as follows: "The wife of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito leased a plot of land to an oil and natural gas company while the judge was weakening the powers of the Environmental Protection Agency, report says". "In June 2022, Justice Samuel Alito's wife leased a plot of land in Oklahoma to an oil and gas company.
Alito's wife stands to earn 3/16ths of the money generated from the land should extraction prove successful.
Alito in several rulings before the court has been part of majority decisions to reduce the scope of the EPA." "But the oil and gas lease troubles many environmentalists given Justice Alito's role in weakening the scope of the Environmental Protection Agency in several cases that have come before the court."
This is an excellent decision by the SCOTUS.
Face the nation sucks
Proud of SCOTUS! Following Constitution and Law of the Land!!
Is civics even taught in school anymore? The number of completely hysterical and nonsensical comments being made regarding this ruling is astounding. There are 3 branches of government. The Executive Branch enforces laws. The Juidicial Branch interprets laws under the Constitution. The Legislative Branch writes the bills that can become laws. Under Chevron Doctrine unelected people in federal agencies seized power of both the Legislative and Executive Branches and were writing "regulations" that had the same power of law without a Presidential signature. And to think all of the leftists boo hoo whining and crying are always going on about "muh democracy".
My father & grandfather both worked for Chevron their entire careers. Everything that I have or will have, I pretty much owe to Chevron. Both my Dad & Grandpa each started working on gas stations & worked their way up through the company. My Dad got a little higher than my grandpa. He was even able to retire at 49. Most see Chevron as the boogeyman, but they fed & clothed me & gave me a pretty good life, by way of my father of course.
State agencies are given their power by these federal agencies and should be shut down as well. ONLY CONSTITUTIONAL LAW!! END ADMINISTRATIVE LAW!!
P.S. To add to my comment below, I think international regulatory agencies that accept USA approvals should get involved also. The more the merrier. They want charlie fox? We'll give them charlie fox.
This sets the precedent for a Trump 2024 win.
she bashing the court but forgets to say anythink about the the ruling they made on the abortion pill finding for the Demacrat supported side. showing that the oourt is fair and balanced giving decisions that are not just ons side
When would the police power be checked as well
😂
Never.
It has been, that's why there is so much crime in liberal cities.
The federal government doesn't have a general police power. Most of its supposed authority is arrived at by extremely creative means.
We are sick and tired of unelected people making policies and laws behind Congress back 🙄
God is always on the right side in the end.
The courts didn't side with the conservatives they cited with the interpretation of the law. This is a great day.
Chevron
Hopefully this ruling will help reign in the corrupt & out of control DEA, the ATF and others. Now, qualified immunity for law enforcement needs to end, as well as, police, FBI being able to seize your money for no real reason.
HUGE WIN for the Second Amendment and putting the ATF in their proper place. 🇺🇸‼️
My God! Are they crazy?
It is great! The bureaucrats are rogue for decades now.
Atf and fbi can not make law.
No
You're crazy
@AlexanderWinterborn You described the current Resident and Administration to a T..... FJB-FBO
Let’s extend empathy and compassion to Trump/Biden and empower the DNC and the RNC to NOMINATE DIFFERENT CANDIDATES FOR PRESIDENT!
Capital pretest 🤦♂️
Good News
This is a great ruling that was a long time coming. Too long actually. The bigger the government the smaller the citizen and less rights they have.
Project 2025 has begun 🎉 goodbye protections😢
Protections??? Protections for who the government?? WTF are you talking about??? This makes it so ambiguous laws can't be interpreted however the agencies want. This is a win for the people.
If project 2025 for people rights over government right. I am all for it.
Goodbye protections for the globalists and the deep state if that’s who you’re rooting for.
@justme-ti1rh The EPA being neutered is protecting people how?
@@steveshirley9694 The EPA does not make laws. They enforce laws that have been made. Giving them the ability to make up whatever they want was a mistake. This rectifies that. The federal administrative state has less power. This is an excellent thing.
I agree that ambiguity should be resolved in court. I also believe EXPAND SCOTUS TODAY! ADD TERM LIMITS!
Ambiguity is settled in the Legislature.
Good. Finally.
I agree with the Supreme Court!
😮
I believe that Chevron said that as long as the agency took the "most reasonable meaning" of the law that the court would defer, but in recent years the agencies have not been doing that and so you get the reversal.
Rock On! ⚖️🇺🇸
Is this the Wild West now? Batten down the hatches
Why do you want tyrannical government?
Crybabying never helps
I live in a constitutional carry state, everything is fine here. Maybe you should get out of your fear bubble. I fear a tyrannical government more than the guns. The guns protect us against a tyrannical government, and criminals who never obey gun laws. Just sayin'
"Democracy is when you force people to do what you want" - Liberals
Good decisions SCOTUS
Good!
Good! Good!
Bot
Make America Great Always 🦅🇺🇸
@@4_EverLuckyfailure
Make America Great Always 🦅🇺🇸
I am so glad they followed with their morals and laws.
Finally, lawyers and politicians can decide if lead pipes are healthy. Or leaded gas. Or seatbelts. Not those evil scientists and subject matter experts.
lead is cheap.
They already legalized bribery....I mean gratuities
When the subject matter experts have been hired because they are men in dresses or because of their race, they're DEI hires and a waste of our money and time.
"Democracy is when you force people to do what you want"
Of course you've completely mischaracterized and distorted the nature of this decision. But it's good to know you're with the elitists who don't trust Americans, federalism, representative democracy, or the courts, and think we have to be ruled by unaccountable bureaucrats in DC
Hello 🗣️Artificial Intelligence? The federal govt just lost all control over AI. Maybe we should put aside our differences and realize this is HUGE for everyone.
The federal government didn't lose control over anything.
Im convinced this will be used as a basis to successfully sue & block the FTC from finalizing the non-compete ban, since this would strip the authority they'd have to do so.
You have something against the working class ?
@@lextacy2008 I'm sorry, what?
@@CVE_00001 I had read that too fast and got a false context that you were taking any sides on the issue. Apologies !
@@lextacy2008 If I'm taking any sides it will definitely be with the working class, but no harm no foul man have a good day~
Now CEO can pollute our waters, land and air. Dumping toxic chemicals everywhere.
Somebody gave you guys a script to copy paste all over the internet huh?
Only a matter of time until Olmstead, ADA, VAWA, and FHA are dismantled.
Nope. Not dismantled, forced to follow their authorizing law.
This Supreme Court is a disgrace
Wah wah wah......😭 Crybabying never helps
Politicians are not the experts the agencies are
"Democracy is when you force people to do what you want"
Well then let them consult the experts, and then make the final decision in a constitutional manner.
Excellent news!
Wonderful. Now maggots are going to decide if we need clean air and water.
😂😂😂 yes
Aww look at the NPC
@@dcrose001 project much?
@@jmp1262Worse than an npc
@@bioboost12 brilliant