Richard Dawkins Destroying Religious Zealots for 10 Minutes
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 вер 2024
- Watch as renowned evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins dismantles religious zealotry with razor-sharp logic and wit in this intense 10-minute showdown.
Become part of our Patreon Community:
/ adoseofreason
By supporting the channel through our Patreon you're also invited to join our private Discord server!
Follow us on Facebook & Twitter:
/ pl.curious
/ twtatheist
Sources:
1. Richard Dawkins - Science works bi***es!
• Richard Dawkins - Scie...
2. Richard Dawkins Debates Alister McGrath
• Richard Dawkins Debate...
3. Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox | Has Science Buried God? Debate
• Richard Dawkins vs Joh...
Email:
TWTatheist@gmail.com
Science took aeroplanes to the sky
Religion took aeroplanes into buildings
@debjyotisarkar1429 science didn’t give man the wisdom to make the planes. A mind was behind the science you speak of it didn’t just happen! Crazies flew planes into buildings! SMH
Science also caused Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear bombings, as well as eugenics in the US and nazi Germany. Religion brought about the end of slavery. Ever heard of Wilberforce and others? My point is that people do bad things and good things too, at bottom. So stop with these simplistic arguments.
Birds flew in the sky long before man figured out how to
dawkins is nothing but a babbling fool
Spouting nonsense about unprovable theories
@@arlandolittle7625 Science does bro. Dont be delusional or deception. Rational and algorithmic mind created science to bring the evidence of happened. If do thing are terrible are horseshit. Just like that. rational things scientific. Irrational things are religious, political and most governmental propaganda. THIS IS IT.
@@DeepKnight-nr6vo Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, and if you just wait a really long *Time* puddles of chemicals can fizz into people by chance? Science is a methodology - what you're talking about is an Ideology about the unobservable past, not "science."
Let me ask you this... *Have you ever heard of the faint young sun paradox?* Scientists observe that our sun is slowly warming up as hydrogen fuses into helium, and at this observed rate, 3.5B years ago our sun would have been 30% fainter and earth would have been frozen solid as a result (if it was really billions of years old). The problem is that atheistic-evolutionists believe that 3.5B years ago chemicals fizzed by chance in a puddle to form all the necessary proteins required for life - in what would have been a global, dead, frozen environment - hence the "paradox." *How do you handle this observable evidence?*
*"Liquid water is generally considered a key ingredient for life. When the Sun was much fainter, the Earth with its present atmospheric composition would have been frozen solid. If the oceans were frozen, life may not have formed" (Quote: NASA).*
A) Biblical Creation proponents happily accept this measurable scientific evidence - it's not a "paradox" at all because the earth isn't billions of years old, and life didn't create itself by chance from a puddle of chemicals, we were intentionally created. This makes sense because there is zero evidence that our earth was ever frozen solid as it should have been if it was really billions of years old, and also zero evidence of an early greenhouse gas atmosphere or other atheistic miracle warming effect to help sustain the atheistic belief in abiogenesis.
B) Atheistic-Naturalists (evolutionists, etc.) however have a problem, because you need billions of years of deep time to make it seem less implausible that chemicals can fizz into people, and that life atheistically created itself. So you have to invoke some kind of a miracle warming effect with no evidence like an early alleged greenhouse gas atmosphere, or various implausible celestial phenomena. Not only do these excuses have zero evidence, but they are also incredibly implausible - because if you did have an early greenhouse gas atmosphere 3.5B years ago, you have to believe that it countered the faint young sun's temperature just right (not too hot like Venus, yet not cold like Mars) and it had to dissipate in perfect inverse proportion to the gradual warming of the sun over time - *all just to make atheistic abiogenesis and early evolution seem less scientifically problematic.*
Two worldviews, same evidences, two very different interpretations. Which one is being more "scientific," the one that just accepts the evidence, or the one that has to fabricate implausible and evidence-less excuses to *circumvent this problematic scientific evidence and sustain their already scientifically-problematic belief that puddles can fizz into people?*
Any thoughts?
*"The evidence of God... has been clearly seen since the beginning in all that has been created, so they will have no excuse"* (Romans 1:20)
“The human mind is extremely susceptible to hallucinations. “ Dr.Richard Dawkins
This was proven by trying to explain why some people say they see a bright light. None of it's real, it's your brain hallucinating.
If your "thoughts" are just chemicals fizzing in your brain, how can you "trust" them? How do you know that your "reasoning" faculties (if there is such a thing) are actually accurate, valid, "true"? If Atheistic abiogenesis and chemical reaction evolution are true, then you are just Mindlessly "dancing to your DNA."
This isn't a problem if you have some kind of an immaterial self or a "soul," something that isn't limited by mere chemical reactions - like being made in the image and likeness of God with a capacity for free will rational thinking, meaning, purpose, value (Genesis 1:26-27), morality and a sense of justice (Genesis 9:6), a conscience which suspiciously reflects the principles of His law (Romans 2:15), a sense of dignity and respect (James 3:10), among other things...
I deeply appreciate that you don't live in accordance with the Atheistic "we're all just chemicals" worldview, but that you live in accordance with the God of Scripture instead - otherwise things would be total chaos.
*"The long and short of it is that I became convinced that atheism implies amorality; and since I am an atheist, I must therefore embrace amorality... The religious fundamentalists are correct: without God, there is no morality. But they are incorrect, I still believe, about there being a God. Hence, I believe, there is no morality."* (Joel Marks, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, University of New Haven, "Philosophy Now," Sep 2010).
*"They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them"* (Romans 2:15)
"The human mind is extremely susceptible to hallucinations. “ - Spoken like a true victim\survivor. :(
Well no one is easier to manipulate then a theist
Like believing the Laws of Physics came after the Big Bang (Stephen Hawking). Or that because living organisms have similar traits that they must have evolved from a common ancestor (cars have similar traits and yet they are created).
Religion began when the first scoundrel met the first fool." Voltaire
@@JoaquimVieira7 ...And the founding fathers all had slaves, your point?
@@JoaquimVieira7 not true. you don't know when the first science happened.
making fire is science, boiling water. making a tool.
That one hell of a good quote
Tired quote. Doesn't disprove God besides
@@JoaquimVieira7 Argument by authority fallacy.
Just because a learned academic believes in a god, doesn't mean they have good evidence for one. We can all be suspect to indoctrination and/or cognitive bias, religiously, ethically or politically.
God sent himself to sacrifice himself to appease himself just to save humanity from himself….. makes sense😂
Lol🎉
And if you don't grovel and do what the charlatan in the funny costume tells you to do, Jesus gonna FRY YOUR ASS!
Alhamdullilah....... Apparently
Sembra quasi una stupidata 😅
@cottonlung You have reached the nadir of logic. Nothing created everything so the evolutionist zealot could believe in nothing and yet nothing does not exist thus there is no logic except nothing for the evolutionist zealot.
science flies man to the moon, religion flies man into buildings.
God created us. God has got 0 to do with religion. So you're right religion kills.
That's why Christ taught against religion. Religious people had The Christ killed. So anybody religious goes against our creator.
@@MegaSwissWatchWhich “God” created us?
@SolarChronicle how am I suppose to know? Have I died?
@@MegaSwissWatch You don't know. Well that's a first.
@SolarChronicle we haven't died to meet God have we?
How refreshing to hear common sense show just what nonsense is religion.
what's ironic is that the testimony we have from the life and adventures of jezus christ are actually the description of the imaginary friend of the psychotic delusional, guilt ridden apostel Paul who started his carreer by torturing people. The gospels tell the story of this imaginary friend, in any case not of a real living man who walked the earth... for the late Roman empire these gospels were a holy grail, a gift that kept giving, the ultimate brainwashing tool.
Religion is not nonsense if understood intelligently. And what do you include in the word
"religion". Just in case you happen to know the meaning of the word at all.....
@@irenehartlmayr8369 you're funny, the most ridiculous claim I've read here so far, religion is the art of brainwashing, abandon intelligence, replace it with blind stupid faith, slave morality.
@@irenehartlmayr8369 "religion: 1 a belief in the existence of a superhuman controlling power, especially of God or gods, usually expressed in worship. 2. a particular system of faith and worship." Oxford American Dictionary. How does one "understand intelligently" a belief or faith for which there is no evidence?
Refreshing to hear someone shamelessly take credit for the achievements of Christ and his dominion? Dawkins has even recently come to admit this himself
If humanity used religion instead of science, we will be still living as if it was the 5th century.
And there would be very few cures for disease.
There is a certain body of people in Britain, that want us too!
They still do in Islamic countries
These religions appeal to the lower classes, the failures
Which is easier? To EARN riches or beg or steal? Clearly the latter
And in an increasingly modern world, Education is necessary
But these religions promise paradise where none of that is necessary - getting the good life is a matter of polishing the right shoes, praying to the "right" God, guess which one?
Things get done like in Corrupt/Communist countries where knowing the right people is how one gets ahead
You can see how this is so appealing to such people
And these are the top 2 religions of the day!
That's how messed up we are
Modern science was quite literally invented by Christians.
BOTH should be used intelligently,then there is no contradiction and no danger !!
Its not an either/ or situation.
Ever heard of the atomic bomb....or chemical warfare ??
Without lies religion dies.
That should be on a T-shirt
'Science dies with Richard Dawkins'--
He has a silver bullet god killer; "infinite regress". "A god requires a creator of its own due
to infinite regress". BUUTTT... In chapters 1 & 2 of The God Delusion he numerous times
qualifies god as "supernatural". NOTHING though about the etiology of infinite regress...
by every indication he literally doesn't know. IT'S THE 1ST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS:
"heat can never derive from cold", i.e. there can be only regresses. Einstein said correctly
as of 100 years later that thermodynamics "is the one law which will NEVER be overthrown".
Thermodynamics is NATURAL LAW...THE MOST natural of all law. "Supernatural"
is not constrained by natural...THAT'S ITS DEFINITION
Dawkins is literally too stupid to recognize so elementary a distinction...OF HIS OWN MAKING!
What do you understand by religion ?
@@irenehartlmayr8369 that all their followers are disingenious when asked if they read their holy books and when you ask them what's in it they either get shocked or make some excuse why they support the verses that allow for slavery and unaliving non-believers.
I dont want to talk with liars and monsters and religious dolts are both.
Please dont talk to me again.
@@irenehartlmayr8369 it's everywhere, it infected every piece of our lives and media. What is there not to know about religion when people try to convert me 100× a day? I cant even go to the store without somebody in line trying to convert me and them threathen me with their version.of hell when i ask for evidence of their god that can actually be tested in reality.
When one person suffers from delusion it is called insanity but when many people suffer from delusion it is called religion
- Richard Dawkins (The God Delusion)
What a silly and brainless statement.Who is Dawkins to state this,in general terms.Very scientific !!!
Dawkins will pass himself off as anything. This time he's being a psychologist. Read a couple of pages of Carl Jung and watch Dawkins become an amateur.
@@bradleymosman8325 This fellow Dawkins us only causing trouble.His contributions to science are minimal.His theory of " the selfish gene " has been disproved.And he has no business to keep babbling about religion,that is not a matter of science.
@@irenehartlmayr8369 There is a Sugar Daddy in the sky - all he wants is for us to believe he exists
Get down on our knees, beg, grovel, blindly obey, sing his praises and he will GIVE us the easy lazy life for eternity!
We get to sit and shamelessly sponge off him for eternity!
That is exactly what many prostitutes, gigolos, yes men and sycophants do down here - how they live the easy good life
Many supporters of Putin, Kim Jong Un and powerful men and women in this world live the same way
These religions have reduced you down to their level and you can't see it
Still think this is not a delusion?
@@irenehartlmayr8369 the first christians were persecuted for being 'delusional', only greater numbers has removed the tag..........
Dawkins nails it. 'One can read one verse that agrees with slavery, and another verse that abolishes slavery.' This is why 40,000+/- Christian sects worldwide. Everyone wants to tell YOU their interpretation of what the bible really means. Then, there's the question of the interpretations of the prophets who created the bible understood what they were dreaming, hallucinating, seeing, and witnessing. Humanity is left with religions that are, at best, dysfunctionaly accurate.
All Christian denominations believe that slavery is wrong. There is no conflict in that regard.
There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Paul’s Letter to the Galatians 49 AD
God says, “trust in the lord with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding..." so anyone who tries to explain what the bible means is straying from the text and leaning on their own understanding - something specifically warned against.
@@joelonsdale The bible is just a man made book of fairytales!
@@martinmoffat5417the old testament explicitly states that you can own slaves and pass them off to your children. Spider-Man fought juggernaut.hulk 23 page 45.
@martinmoffat5417
I find that a contradiction of ideology. Christians may find slavery of a person wrong, yet they hold themselves and others to the acceptance of sin and repentance or a penalty of Hell is given. Slavery of the mind and spirit is only a coma point away from physical slavery. 'Believe or ELSE!' Fear is the basic and most detrimental form of pain, suffering, bandage, slavery... there is. Just look at religious cults around the world. They ALL use fear as a tool to keep believers, faithful. If Satan did exist, fear would be it's main tool of slavery. Evil in general.
"What do you have to say to someone who has met the risen lord Jesus christ?" Well, sir...the first thing I'd suspect is that you're lying.
Or insane.
Or he speaks truth
@@kofidan9128 Well, then he has all of his work ahead of him to convince any rational person that it's worth believing.
@@MizzouRah78 depends on whether or not said rational person is open minded
Or the actual truth..
Richard Dawkins is spot on when describing the Bible is full of only stories. The Bible is basically just a Story Book and should be treated as such
If someone was to write it now, it would be turned down by the publisher`s as bad fiction.
Ancient people living under Kings, Dictators used them as a template for God
Hence all the - Get down on our knees, beg, grovel, blindly obey, sing only his praises and be rewarded etc
Those were simpler times, primitive uneducated people - they did the best they could
They envisioned an afterworld similar to the world they inhabited - a King/Dictator like God sitting on his Throne in the Heavens, Heaven is him Kingdom, only those who are loyal and support him blindly are allowed in
It would be like living in Russia or North Korea today!
Amazingly not even the best of minds of today can see this!
Frighteningly I wrote about this to so many newspapers and magazines and NONE will publish the above!
Yet so many uneducated simple minded people today still think its true
Yes
@@ramaraksha01 it's all bollocks
Science, because you can’t pray this shit into space.
Correct. Prayer didn't put 200,000 pieces of space debris into orbit around the earth. NASA scientists did this. Debris is another word for shit.
@@bradleymosman8325better than ethinic minorities being slaughtered in the name jesus christ just because they wouldnt pray the same way, like Guam in the 16th century
@@bradleymosman8325you really want to compare the evil done purposefully in the name of god by the religious to the evil done purposefully or accidentally by scientists who explore space or anything else for that matter? Reality can be difficult but it is reality none the less.
@@bradleymosman8325 in your world only nasa scientists put debris in space. There are other space agencies too.
@@tonyfanfarone There is also spiritual reality.And that is what religion is about,understood intelligently.
A voice of sanity and reason in this increasingly polarized world.
While I agree that not much of what Mr Dawkins says, is fair comment, I’m not very clear that he does anything to reduce the polarisation.
Surely we should be seeking for common ground and mutual understanding, not ridiculing the opinions of others.
And he works behind the scenes with polarisation, ok?
It’s time that humanity started to take responsibility for its own actions, and stop blaming them on some mythical, outdated being.
“ThE DEviL mAde mE do iT”
God will always be needed jus look at the world around you
What,@@ruoazquara6070? The trees? I'm looking at them. Still yet to see your point. (To be clear this is in reference to the "look at the trees" argument. It's ridiculous.)
@@HunnidTheTrapper02 it’s no argument it’s the truth if u need more confirmation look into a mirror
@@ruoazquara6070ok, I guess it's the truth if YOU say so. No further explanation needed 😒.
As long as there are gullible people, there will always exist conmen and religions.
in essence religion is like one of these timesharing scams, just that the promised property is in the afterlife and they don't even need to fake photo's of it.
How much credit card debt are you carrying and why? You don't need religion to be conned.
@@bradleymosman8325 great comment, religion lost another reason to exist.
As long as there are gullible people,people like Dawkins can flourish.
What is frightening is how high it goes
I keep saying Heaven is but a metaphor for the womb, childhood, the past, the "good old days"
Religions exploiting Nostalgia for the good old days - telling their followers that they can run back to those days
A Nanny God will nicely keep them in eternal comfort
But I can't get such a view published anywhere! Not even philosophy magazines will publish such a view!
I have never had any delusions or illusions. I am a normal atheist.
Life-long happily an atheist, atheist dad but unfortunately very religious mother
It's good to be born and brought up atheist, isn't it. You can see it from all sides.
In my opinion, If you identify as an atheist, you’ve made it into a religion.
I hate that we have to actually have this word "atheist". This is simply the norm for any human being without religious indoctrination. The theists should be the anti- anything, they should be the outliers, not us.
@@MarkoVukovic0 Well, the day they stop using words like theist, christian, catholic, Jew, muslim, Islam. I'll stop calling myself an atheist. In the meantime, it's in the Oxford dictionary and if it's good enough for the Oxford Uni, it's good enough for me.
Only sober person in party of drunks ❤
Frustrating
So he thinks 😆
Religion began when the first Con artist met the 1st fool 😬😬😬
I guess that means there's a lot of fools in the world huh? Why do you think about what you said
@@Whatever-w9c There are many many many many !! Countless !!!!!!
As far as I know, none of the worshipped characters had a fund me page ...
@@danhtran6401 Exactly !! We dont " KNOW" much of anything !!!!
Still doesn't disprove God
It’s courageous and tenacious to question claims of miracles and spiritual wisdom, than to be silenced by them.
Why you have tik tok and youtube. How is that brave. People create tik tok (with all kinds of subjects) for reasons ofratings and money. Tell me how is that brave again
Christians would have at least one point if the condoning and instructions for slavery were removed from the Bible completely. But, still to this day, these entries are STILL in the Bible. So for this man to suggest that Christianity was behind the ending of slavery is absolutely dishonest and insulting.
There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Paul’s Letter to the Galatians 49 AD
“For perhaps he was for this reason separated from you for a while, that you would have him back forever, no longer as a slave, but more than a slave, a beloved brother, especially to me, but how much more to you, both in the flesh and in the Lord”
Paul’s Letter to Philemon 60AD
Philemon, under Roman law, could execute his slave for fleeing however, Paul pleas with Philemon to accept his servant. Paul goes one-step further and asks Philemon not only to accept his slave, but also to accept him as a brother in Christ and to overlook his faults and errors.
Christian abolitionism took root in the 17th century. In England, prominent Anglicans joined forces with Quakers, Baptists, Presbyterians, Methodists, Congregationalists, and other faith groups to form the world's first anti-slavery movement.
In 1741, Pope Benedict XIV condemned slavery generally. In 1815, Pope Pius VII demanded the Congress of Vienna to suppress the slave trade. In the Bull of Canonization of Peter Claver, one of the most illustrious adversaries of slavery, Pope Pius IX branded the "supreme villainy" (summum nefas) of the slave traders;[26]
In 1839 Pope Gregory XVI condemned the slave trade in In supremo apostolatus;[27] and in 1888 Pope Leo XIII condemned slavery in In Plurimis
Prominent among these abolitionists was Parliamentarian William Wilberforce in England, who wrote in his diary when he was 28 that, "God Almighty has set before me two great objects, the suppression of the Slave Trade and Reformation of Morals." With others he labored, despite determined opposition, to finally abolish the British slave trade
Religion is built on anecdotes and personal experience. Science is built on evidence, direct observation, and peer reviewed studies.
Personal experience is the only source of experiential knowledge, which is the highest form of knowledge. Thus, personal experience is of great intellectual importance. To condemn personal experience is like saying marriage is illegitimate as a social institution, for the reason that not every marriage works. Or, that friendship is useless because not every friendship works. And yet we all know how deeply essential to life friendship is. And so when it comes to personal experience, it's best to consider it on a case-by-case basis rather than lumping them all together and throwing them out. Also, if God is a person, instead of just a theory, then we've got to experience him.
Additionally, the scientific method is only suited to the natural world. Religions, broadly speaking, deal with God. And God is a supernatural being who lives in the supernatural world. The supernatural is utterly different from the natural. It's also far superior to it. The supernatural world is well above and beyond the "revered" scientific methods of the natural world with its peer reviews. Think of the fact, for example, that supernatural beings aren't affected by physical quantities such as gravity, time, and space. The supernatural can only be accessed and assessed by supernatural means, which I explain in my proof of God.
@@kofidan9128 It is of course absurd to claim that "Personal experience is the only source of experiential knowledge". This stance gives delusions higher value than measurements. It gives dreams more substance than reality. It positions drug use above studies.
You are strange.
Magic and religion is also baseado in evidence
I've been saying this about religious Zealots. It takes away their ability to question. Religion started when the first Con man met the first Fool.
I’m really sorry about the type of religion that you have experienced. I too would want to escape from it!
I think true religion is about the search for truth and how to live well. Searching for truth, means questioning!
If you have studied religion, you will know about stages of faith and how you begin as a child in the “authority“ stage. Unfortunately, many people do not move beyond this into the second and more interesting “questioning” stage.
In my opinion, much religion deserves to be rejected, but that doesn’t mean the whole project is flawed. Please do not throw out the baby with the bathwater!
@@micklumsden3956 PRECISELY !! THAT is what atheists do not understand,because they cannot reason properly.While at the same time accusing OTHERS of this ,THEIR own fault!!
A classical example of ( dishonest and stupid ) PROJECTION. Scape-goat thinking !!..
All the people who see Jesus in a slice of toast actually believed this.
I had french toast today - I guess Jesus isn't French because I did not see him in there.
@@gary17509 You bought the wrong brand.
@@toni4729 I had cereal today and I didn't see him in there either.
And dog fluff butt cracks
@@FactStorm Very intelligent How did you work that one out.
why did god or jesus come down to hang on a cross to save us?? all he had to do is raise a finger and say " i save humans" full stop.
Naive
@@kofidan9128 No, he has an excellent point... unlike U and your dishonest drivel.
What a wonderful time we live in the same time with someone like Richard Dawkins. He and the late Christoper Hitchens, incredible ppl.
Unfortunately, the superficial ones do not think enough to understand *the simple fact that from no intelligence involved, no intelligence comes,* the entire process until nowadays proving the existence of God because *the results of a process prove the intelligence involved into that process* (even schoolchildren can understand that every photon, ... atom, ... cell has intelligence into it, *not to mention their functionality together).*
They ignore the intelligence put from the beginning. For example, the intelligence mentioned includes the exact value of the speed of light matching the manifestation of what we call "gravity", working together since the primordial conditions to form in the end this reality, which hosts intelligent life that is able to feel / understand / admire / enjoy / respect / love the Creator, especially through His human form, Jesus Christ.
Those wise enough understand that *God is not bounded by time (not being bounded by what He has created), respectively He is eternal, always existed, which means that He was not created,* but atheists ignore, also, the other fact about the nature of God that our power of comprehension will always be like how much the cups can think to understand the man who made them (comparison mentioned in the Bible). Anyway, *they have no excuse because we have Jesus Christ, the human form of Divinity, to be able to understand.*
@@filmeseverinyeah… check out a Galton board. Patterns from chaos?
It is our responsibility to distinguish between right and wrong. Because we understand what it feels like to be wrong. Religion is just needlessly adding extra steps
I am 77 years old , I am afraid that I will not live to see the second coming. I missed the first!
Hey we love u man ❤
You won’t see the second coming. Stop worrying and enjoy your life.
There won't ever be a 2nd coming
Asking for a second coming is like asking for a genocide. God doesn't even want that, not yet anyway.
I hope you're prepared for the choices you made for your soul
Hence why I praise the Flying Spaghetti Monster. He boiled for our sins. Praise him and be touched by his noodley appendages.
Ramen!
Bolognaise be his name, for ever and ever arrabiata.
Ramen!
Ramen!
Ramen..yeh!
@@robertlight5227Ramen :3
One of like 5 people in the world I wish to meet. A monster of a man, not just for his science and bravery in public promoting the insanity of religion, but for his humility and kindness and advocating that life is beautiful even without the dangerous mysticism thinking
Dogmatic hero-worship. Too bad he's a mere mortal whose end is nigh 😂
After a finite number of years we all will leave this world and will receive what we deserve. According to the following two testimonies (and many hundreds more available online; even I had a true NDE) all evil we do, which cannot be forgiven by Divinity, is sending us to hell, instead of Heaven:
"Atheist College Professor dies and sees hell and demons - it changed his life - Pt 1";
"Atheist College Professor dies and sees hell and demons - it changed his life - Pt 2";
"Man Sees Unthinkable Horrors in Hell Christians Being Tortured! (Mario Martinez)".
Therefore, the believing of the truth revealed by God/Jesus will help / convince / determine... us to always strive to do only good for the rest of our earthly life (and to always regret deeply our bad deeds, to sin no more), to be easier for us at the Judgment, to go into Heaven before many others, to never taste hell, to be more loved by Divinity, but *ALL humans will be judged for their deeds* (as seen into those videos mentioned).
*_"For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that each one may receive his due for the things done in the body, whether good or bad."_* 2 Corinthians 5, 10
I wish only well to everyone and as much wisdom as possible for everyone! To be saved!
He is not that. sympathetic. I met him in a congress here in Brazil and got his autograph.
@@kofidan9128 If not for religion, mankind would be 1000 years more advanced then we are now. There was a pause due to religion, of intellectual thought, during the medieval period which lasted from about the 5th century to the 15th century.
'Morality has evolved for secular reasons' ...who told him that?
tomgreene1843.. I take it you disagree with him then yeah..
You can be totally moral without religion.
@@Gertyutz Wherein lies the totality?
@@tomgreene1843 ? Please explain.
@@Gertyutz I was just wondering about ''totally moral'.
Wow! He's coming back, the toast shows his picture. Of course no one has ever seen a picture of him. But that toast lit up the whole world.
What amuses me is all the depictions of the jebus in art show a dude with long hair and distinctly European features in pristine white garb, and not a dirty Middle Eastern peasant who would have been taking his dumps in a hole in the ground.
If you talk to someone who says they've felt the presence of God or talked to God or spoken in tongues, call an ambulance quickly they're having a stroke!!
Religion comes from the fear of death, the fear of life. I have one big fear, RELIGION!
You have a point. Religion seems to be the excuse that grifters use to do evil deeds to others. That’s a lot to fear!
@@JoaquimVieira7 There is no logical proof for or against the existence of a god.
Still doesn't disprove God
@@kofidan9128 that would put your god in the same class as the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Is that really what you want to say?
@@fredworthmn who says spaghetti monster ain't real? He's been real enough to trick many, including you, into ignorance of God.
This is where I get my arguments for debating sky daddy’s fans across the internet 😂 Seriously now, this man is probably one of the greatest philosophers of our time.
God destroys a world he created with a flood, because he thought it became wicked. Then instantly regrets it by creating a rainbow. He could have found countless ways to communicate how to improve humankind instead of using a drunk has a blow horn. How moral is a god that commits genocide?
Okay, create a universe from nothing, pls?
I'll wait... :P
@@ShuggieEdvaldson Why creaitonists still babble about nothing? 😀Prove there was nothing before universe. I'll wait... 🤣
@@ShuggieEdvaldson"One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It's simply to painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we've been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back."-Carl Sagan.
@@Seticzech *The only way for nature to create itself is if nature is pre-existent - like God.*
The 1st law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to "naturally" come from nothing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics (entropy) is that energy is always being converted into a less usable form, and it doesn't allow energy to last forever, because in the infinite past it would have been infinitely used up by now. *So if our universe can't "naturally" have a beginning from nothing, and it can't have just always been here (otherwise all of our energy would be infinitely used up), how do you naturally explain the beginning of our universe?*
Have you ever wondered why Atheistic-Naturalists have to invoke such wild and sci-fi sounding theories to sustain their "natural" (atheistic) beliefs on our origins? *Infinite* alternate universes, an *eternal self-existent* singularity, alternate unobservable metaphysical laws of nature, *pre-existent* phenomena... they have to attribute supernatural qualities of God to "nature" in order to "naturally" explain our origins. This is the Atheist's Natural-Supernatural (!) worldview. It's an internally inconsistent and self-refuting belief system... the only way for nature to create itself is if nature is *pre-existent - like God.*
*"The evidence of God... has been clearly seen since the beginning in all that has been created, so they will have no excuse"* (Romans 1:20)
The laws of thermodynamics don't allow the universe to exist forever, so there must be a previous "nothing [material]" at some point. Either you look beyond the 2nd law of thermodynamics (ie. "beyond-nature" = Supernatural), or you declare our universe to be pre-existent and self-existent like God - either way you refute your entire philosophy of Naturalism and every doctrine built upon it (Abiogenesis, Evolution, Big Bang, etc.).
@@michaelg377 "The only way for nature to create itself is if nature is pre-existent - like God." Present your evidence for that claim.
"The 1st law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to "naturally" come from nothing." LMAO you don't understand science. That law applies to CLOSED SYSTEMS ONLY. 😀I always love when creationistic ignorants babble about thermodynamics, or evolution, or any science. 🤣🤣🤣
"The 2nd law of thermodynamics (entropy) is that energy is always being converted into a less usable form" LMAO You're wrong again. That law applies to universe as a whole only. BTW you don't understand entropy either, obviously. There is no such thing as less usable form of energy. 😀I bet you don't know what energy is either.
"So if our universe can't "naturally" have a beginning from nothing" Present your evidence there was nothing before universe.
"how do you naturally explain the beginning of our universe?" Energy always existed. Easy peasy. BTW we don't know if universe had a beginning. Matter and spacetime most likely did, but that doesn't mean universe as well. 😀Typical creationistic ignorant.
"It's an internally inconsistent and self-refuting belief system" Ok, you don't understand cosmology. What a shock... 😀
"(Romans 1:20)"Bible was written by iron age totally ignorant superstitious illiterate goad herders who didn't know where Sun goes at night. Bible is just book of fairy tales and stories and represent only THINKING of their authors.
"The laws of thermodynamics don't allow the universe to exist forever" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Utter BS. If time had beginning, universe existed forever - throughout the all existence of time.
Please, continue to show creationistic ignorance. 😀
as far as we know, humans are the only beings in the universe capable of complex thinking. why anybody would want to discard such a privilege and give it over to a magical man in the sky is beyond me.
Very sound argument 😂
@@kofidan9128 Yes, it is.
@@paleopal🤣
@@kofidan9128 Ur a liar and U know it. U will therefore spend eternity in the inferno.
Any religious person will fail to answer this question:
Why have there been thousands of different religions? Even if you pick among the greatest ones, i.ex hinduism. Why did it have its origin? And what makes your religion stand out and differ from the rest?
If let’s say christianity and the idea of a God entity was something the «true God» would finally give to humans through Jesus, how come beliefs of a God was already invented by humans?
This is proof enough to conclude that all religions and beliefs in Godly creatures are imaginary.
All those different religions can’t all be right ….. but they can all be wrong.
@@mattd6050 religious people seem to avoid this subject, or they just ignore other religions because of their faith. I am so bothered by the thought of that religions and the idea of a Godly thing had popped up all across the globe, and they dont talk about the same God at all, but the idea is similar. All the rest is time- and place spesific, which ofc would be logic since people lived in different continents.
While it may seem like the diversity of religions undermines the truth of any one of them, it actually reflects humanity's innate search for meaning and connection with the divine. Different religions have arisen in various cultures, often shaped by their specific histories, languages, and experiences. However, the core of many religions often shares similar values, such as love, justice, and the search for truth.
Your problem is that you misunderstand what you're trying to argue about. Christianity, for example, doesn't dismiss the truths that might exist in other religions; instead, it sees itself as the fulfillment and clarification of those truths.
If there's just one horror in a holy book, it isn't holy.
The reason they have horror stories is their books is a test
They have zero evidence - so these guys go around making cheap promises of Heaven & pesky guys like yourself stand up and ask for evidence and since they have none, they have come up with "Heaven only for believers"
So now they have kept you out, now they have committed followers who drool over their promises
Once they gain a majority they can then come after you
And that is where the horror stories come in - if you can read about a "God" who implores his followers to kill and rape and you are still singing his praises, now you can be implored to go kill and rape those unbelievers, see?
If you see a guy on the street brandishing a knife and saying he is going to kill his family because God told him to you would call the cops. These guys upon learning that the guy's name is Abraham will be singing his praises and handing him big knives
That's how messed up these guys are
There's more than one - it's sicker than a slasher movie .
@@JoaquimVieira7are you fr?
Lack of understanding
@@JoaquimVieira7 slaves rape murder Have you not read it?
People can be religious, it's a kind of spiritual need for some. When they take things literally or think their religion has any impact on the material world: that's when idiocy starts.
The most important bit is that those Christians who “have evolved…. Moved on”, flatly refuse to remove the offending parts of their Bible. They do not publicly denounce the wrong parts of the Bible.
I am a Christian. And I agree with you completely that there are parts of the Bible that are offensive and in my opinion, not Christian.
If I were “in charge“ I would remove from the gospel text, the part where the Jewish leader says “let his blood be on us and our children“.
@@micklumsden3956
I would start with Leviticus.
American Christians devolved -as in, went backwards. Historically, Christians did not read these texts literally.
Love Dawkins. I feel like he's incapable of lying. Of course he isn't, but I really feel like he just never wants to. I love that.
He doesn't have to lie, that's the big advantage against theists. 🙂
@@Seticzech
Lol...Brilliant.
So his truth, is the only real truth, is that what you're saying? :)
Nobody is accusing him of lying, no, we're accusing him of being utterly fraudulent...
there is a difference! :P
Jesus is Lord!
@@ShuggieEdvaldson "So his truth, is the only real truth, is that what you're saying? :)" You can disprove anything he said. But you never will, right? 😀
"we're accusing him of being utterly fraudulent..." We? You mean you and that voices in your head pretending they're your god? 😀
"Jesus is Lord!" Jesus is myth.
@@Seticzech
"You can disprove anything hi said"
No, i can disprove everything he said, using 3 simple words in science, too... ready?
'The Measurement Problem'
There you go, easy as Pi. :)
Still, i just wish my faith was strong as yours. xD
@@ShuggieEdvaldson 'The Measurement Problem' What? 😀
Now Dawkins is a cultural christian...so consistent and coherent....
Richard speaks the reality in a gentle but emphatic way. He is right, so right. I cannot believe that such a high proprtion of mankind has been brainwashed.... has been dragged into such a state of delusion.... wasting so much of their 'few decades' of life in this universe - in particular, on this planet.
Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, and if you just wait a really long *Time* puddles of chemicals can fizz into people by chance?
@@michaelg377 Fish actually never entered my mind.... but know that fish are actually real!
@@jeffreyhearn8930 Fish are very real, but it is a mythology that fish evolve into philosophers - that's not how "science" (a methodology) works. We are all *Uncritically Indoctrinated* into this modern atheistic mythology that puddles of chemicals can fizz into people if you just add lots of *Time,* and that nothing created everything accidentally with mathematical precision for no reason, which is scientifically ludicrous.
Let me ask you this... *How did male and female evolve?* Charles Darwin met the gold standard of science (a methodology) by giving a testable hypothesis for his theory: "If it could be demonstrated that any complex *organ* existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down..."
Before you answer, consider that these are two separate, yet interdependent, precision tuned sets of organs that all have to be working just right or reproduction, life, and evolution fail.
For example:
The fallopian tubes are lined with millions of these little hairs that all wave the same direction, and their purpose is to guide the egg from the ovaries down into the uterus. If they stood still, laid flat, waved the wrong direction, or didn't exist - the egg would either die or it would implant in the fallopian tube thus killing the mother. Some of these are known medical conditions that prevent pregnancy - "Evolution" had to get these millions of hairs just right.... "by numerous, successive, slight modifications."
*Simultaneously* the sperm has a whip like rotor, a motor encasing, a bushing like material, a nutrient transfer system, and several other components that all have to be working *just right* or the sperm can't find the egg. Reproduction and life fails. "Evolution" had to get the interdependent parts of the sperm "just right" ... "by numerous, successive, slight modifications."
*Then* you have the placenta which does everything for the baby including keeping the mother's and baby's blood separate, the expanding and contracting uterus and cervix, the mechanism which only allows one sperm into the egg, and numerous other components that all had to be *designed* just right, or reproduction and life fails. "Evolution" had to *SIMULTANEOUSLY* get all of these just right "by numerous, successive, slight modifications."
Which gender evolved first, and how did it reproduce while the other hadn't evolved yet? And going backwards in time, which of these critical organs do you gradually reduce first "by numerous, successive, slight modifications" without causing reproduction to fail?
*"“Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’"* (Matthew 19:4). Such *specified complexity* looks like the product of an Intelligent engineering mind, not the result of chance fizzing chemicals in a puddle. Puddles don't turn themselves into people no matter how much *time* you add to the mix.
@@michaelg377 just say you you deny evolution because it contradicts your faith. You don't want it to be true. So you act like it's a ridiculous impossible idea
@@kc_h7h just say you deny God because it contradicts your faith. You don't want it to be rue. So you act like it's a ridiculous impossible idea... can you see the problem?
Indeed fish are real, but I don't believe they will ever turn into philosophers. Tell me something... in your worldview, when all the right chemicals fizzed into all the necessary proteins required for life, and then into all the necessary cell components inside of a cell enclosure for no reason, *how did they overcome the problem of hydrolysis which inhibits protein formation in water?*
*"we've not made the RNA in a prebiotically relevant manner. It hydrolyzes too rapidly."* (Professor Saztech, Chicago, 2021)
[Regarding Abiogenesis] *"Chemistry is actually hard to get to work. The molecules precipitate. The molecules hydrolyze. The molecules decompose. And so it's very much a constraint that you have to deal with.. it's one g-d problem after another."* (Steve Benner, former Harvard Professor, Director of Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution, 2019)
I've always loved the "fancy Darwin talk" line, haha. Seriously though, the lack of science education is a major problem in this country.
In the UK it's not rare to find people who can't calculate perecentages.
@@CCP_Operative shit, in America it's not rare to find people who couldn't tell you what percent means.
Can't wait for the theists embarrassing themselves in the comments.
How about Ex-Christian Deists?
@razony Those are theists anyway. Also welcome.
@@Lordidude
Giddy-Up...
Theists cannot be worse than atheists in their reasoning....
I used to be an atheist...
Mark Twain - 'Religion was invented when the first con man met the first fool.'
Today, women's rights are being taken away. These kinds of people have taken away a woman's right to her body.
What happened to separation of church and state? Why are people being forced to obey a religious law that religious people are forcing on others?
Why do religious people have the right to bully and use hate speech towards people not like them. But, if a person stands up for their rights. Certain media platforms shut them down.
When will people have the right not to be religious and not belittled for their beliefs?
"women's rights are being taken away. These kinds of people have taken away a woman's right to her body."
Thank you for those powerful pro-life arguments. I completely agree, we should not be dismembering little women inside of their mother's womb, pulling them out piece by piece, and then laying their body parts together on a surgical tray to make sure that they didn't leave any body parts inside.
And I am thankful that they didn't do this to you, or me, either.
From the moment of conception you are a human being, growing on your own (inside of your mother), with a fully developed and completed human DNA signature that will never have anything taken away from it or added to it, and as early as about 3 weeks through modern technology we can actually detect those signs of life (ie. they are there much earlier, but we can detect them as early as 3 weeks now). It's a beautiful thing.
We don't execute children because they might have a hard life - otherwise we should round up all the disabled and poor children, right?
We also don't execute children because of their location - No doubt, pregnancy is hard (and a blessing according to nearly every mother I've ever spoken to), but that is a distinct separate human being you are dismembering, chemically burning, or starving. A poor little woman denied her rights to her body because the older woman 99% of the time was irresponsible with her sexual behavior (only 1% is due to rape, etc.).
I stand by women's rights too, but I stand for all women, including the little ones you want the right to butcher to sustain your sexual lifestyle.
All in the name of Pedo Priests who long to administer CPR to alter-boys and touch toddlers
Superb compilation. What a mind, what a man. What a legend. Perhaps soon(he's 84), just a wonderful , amazing legacy he'll leave. Thank you Richard.
The gods are man's creation to give answers that they are too afraid to give themselves.
Viking Ragnar Lothbrok
Did you imagine that We created you without any purpose, and that you will not be brought back to Us?" - Quran 23-118
@@quantum_nebula_92 : Who are "We"?
Christian: “You’re absolutely provocative about [the Abrahamic] God.” Richard Dawkins: “I don’t have to do much more than just quote the Bible to be provocative.”
You take religion out of people and they will make you their religion, This man is keeping that dream alive. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
He didn't say "bitches", did he?
Ahh, , , 🎉🎉🎉 You Guys just don't know just how happy I am seeing people on the comment section applying rationality, good reasoning and common sense🎉🎉🎉 True Joy
Dawkslaps.
I also say to my religious friend,the day all the secrets of mind is discovered that day religion start to die.Everything is just mind game nothing more
thank God for Richard Dawkins
Hee hee.
thank who?
If not for religion, mankind would be 1000 years more advanced then we are now. There was a pause due to religion, of intellectual thought, during the medieval period which lasted from about the 5th century to the 15th century.
There is no big brother in the sky
That's called a satellite....lol
Jupiter is there
@@b4ph0m3tdk9what came 1st the chicken or the egg?
@@b4ph0m3tdk9how was Jupiter made ?
Jupiter was made from gases and gravity, nothing else. It is the same for the other gas planets and the sun. The three rock planets contain materials made from stars, and are made with gravity.
There was a time I claimed to have felt the presence of god. I was closed minded and had limited appreciation for science. I was a zealot. But I was released of my religious beliefs and now an atheist. So I know what it’s like to have a limited view of the world all seen through a religious POV.
Generally, those from such videos, exposed to my clear and undeniable demonstrations but who still want to remain atheists, are ignoring intentionally the simple fact that *from no intelligence involved, no intelligence comes,* hoping that this reality is the result of no intelligence, in other words that God does not exist, only to escape the responsibility for their deeds, to not be Judged by God/Jesus after the leaving of this world, but they are in error. *_"For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that each one may receive his due for the things done in the body, whether good or bad."_* 2 Corinthians 5, 10
My simple and undeniable demonstrations can be found after sorting the comments.
@@filmeseverin God isn't real because magic isn't real. Also, Judeo-Christianity is insane and paradoxical, and can in no way be true or correct. Done. Oh, but if you DO have evidence for your lurid beliefs that nobody has ever seen, please do present it here.
Why accept a Celestial Dictator who loves seeing some in prosperity and the others in distress?
Why not get an understanding of the Bible before making conclusions about it?
Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, and that if you just wait a long enough *Time* puddles of chemicals can fizz into people by chance? Or what about Hitler, do you believe he did his deed, burying people alive, shooting people side by side to save bullets... and he just disintegrated back into chemicals (dust) with no consequences - you can be as evil as you want without reprimand? Lying, theft, adultery, fornication, dishonoring your parents, idolatry, blasphemy, hatred... it's all okay?
*"All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God"* (Romans 3:23) *"The wages of sin is death..."* (Romans 6:23) *"But God showed His love for us by sending His Son to die for us while we were still sinners"* (Romans 5:8)
*"It is appointed for a man to die once, then comes Judgment"* (Hebrews 9:27)
Which sinners do you believe deserve prosperity from God?
@@kofidan9128
I have a decent understanding of the Bible which indeed has no answers to the uneven distribution of prosperity and adversity.
Do not spout the drivel of sin and eligibility criteria based on which adversity and prosperity are distributed!
I have read enough of such platitudes!
@@anilnadaikkave you have a decent understanding of the Bible? So you think
I've got an imaginary friend, I know he is fictional.
I invented him to amuse me.
I've got an imaginary friend, i know he is fictional. I invented him to amuse me
I'm thinking of becoming a creationist. Can anyone recommend a good lobotomy surgeon?
Dang! First coming into the video has such a powerful start!
Our morals, good and/or bad, come from our nervous system.
😂
What would I say to someone who says they have met Christ?
Prove it.
The question is: Why so many were/are opposing to the main advice from Jesus Christ: to strive always for goodness, wisdom, justice... for perfection? *_"Be perfect therefore, as your Heavenly Father is perfect"_* Matthew 5, 48
Most probably, because just as it is easier to destroy something useful than to make/build something useful, in the same way it is easier to be evil=stupid than to be good=wise.
@@filmeseverin I don't believe in your bible. So quoting it to me makes no sense. I don't care what your old stone aged book says about anything.
@@iomis2001 Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, and if you just wait a really long *time* puddles of chemicals can fizz into people by chance?
You can either believe that God intentionally created man and woman out of the dirt (chemicals), or you can believe that dirt (chemicals) fizzed itself into man and woman by chance just by waiting a really long *time* for no reason... I just don't have enough faith to believe that dirt can do that.
*"For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature-have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse."* (Romans 1:20)
First prove you're open minded
@@kofidan9128 Your logic is flawed.
Religion will long be around long after Dawkins is dead and forgotten.
Not really Nones are the fastest growing group worldwide especially in first world countries where by the next cencus are predicted the be majorities in most European countries
It will luckly die sooner or later. Like; Zeus, Apollo, Thor and Loki. No one belive in them anymore. The same thing will happen with today's world believs
True. Isnt that a shame?
@@Leon-r6x3l zeusis the same as Deus (God)
Sept, 2008 The Church of England apologizes to Charles Darwin for its initial rejection of his theories, nearly 150 years after he published his most famous work.
Feb 11, 2009 -The Vatican claims Darwin's theory of evolution is compatible with Christianity.
Within his heart a fool says there is No GOD!!! In The Beginning GOD Made The Heavens and The Earth
The universe already existed for 8.7 billion years before earth was formed
Just so you know
True religion is to help widows,children ,old and crippled!
Yep, and also the powerful.
*True Religion (based in Vernon, California | established in 2002 by Jeff Lubell & Kym Gold) is an American clothing company feat. brand designer jeans manufactured from premium denim which rose to fame in the mid-to-late 2000s but faced bankruptcy in subsequent years
'This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God's servants, who give their full time to governing.' Romans 13:6
Are you kidding me?! Tax collectors were appointed by God?! What a scam.
"For the one in authority is *God’s servant for your good.* But if you do wrong, be afraid, for *rulers do not bear the sword for no reason.* They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring *punishment on the wrongdoer.* 5 Therefore, it is necessary to *submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also as a matter of conscience.*
6 *This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God’s servants, who give their full time to governing. 7 Give to everyone what you owe them: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor."* (Romans 13:1-7, full context).
Liberal Anti-Christian politicians tend to have higher taxes and interest rates, they need it to fund their social programs. Consider California, New York, Maryland... some of the biggest, highest taxes, most liberal, and most expensive states to live in. Just saying.
@@michaelg377 Jesus is the one telling U to pay yer taxes, MAGA boy. He was the first commie.
@@DocReasonable As are the liberals. In any case, you're still twisting Scriptures out of context my friend.
*"All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God"* (Romans 3:23).
You don't believe in God, but you invest a great deal of energy and time into spreading your hatred of this "imaginary character" lol...
As an Atheist, *How do you get from meaningless goo to meaningful and valuable you, just by adding time + chemicals + chance in a meaningless universe?*
@@michaelg377 MOST people on earth don't believe in your religion, and most of them are NOT atheists. They just have less-stupid religions than yours.
@@michaelg377 Luke 20:22-25
DISCIPLES: "Is it right for us to pay taxes to Caesar or not?"
JESUS: "I see through your duplicity. Give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar!"
Removing GOD from the equation opens up a whole new world of Science and Fact based discovery.
The problem with the deceived ones is that they do not know enough science, otherwise they would realize the fact that true/proven/useful science is used to gain the trust and after that the fake/unproven (because it is false) science, *on which are wasted the most resources,* is used to manipulate the superficial people, to keep them away from the truth about/from God/Jesus, the most important truth.
That last guys whole life is a delusion.
And EXACTLY why religion is not some passive and safe belief we should respect. Did you see the fire in his eyes?
There is NO god. Grow up.
It may be unlikely but we don't really know that for sure, however improbable it seems. it seems.
@@normangoldstuck8107 same applies to Centaurs, Santa, ferries, zeus, Batman, Thor, leprechauns, kratos, and so on. So, let's be equally skeptical.
@@normangoldstuck8107 There is literally no reason to even think gods existence could be real. God can't exists by the very definition of existence.
@@Op-ez7hs You mean Juno isn't real- and I pray to him every day.
@@Seticzech I know that's why I believe in Juno.
God does not exist. Get over it.
They had me fooled as a child when they claimed that religion deals with the answers to the why-question... where this claim is actually totally empty, they have nothing, 'it was god' is as solid as an argument of knowledge as 'ask your mom'. Getting over it was not that dramatic, sweet oblivion, just being gone and finished after this life, is not as horrible as people fear it to be.
Maths does not exist. Get a life. :P
@davideddy5877....proove that !
@@irenehartlmayr8369 he's in a place outside of time and space, never, nowhere...
@@marcdc6809 Thats where immaterial things are.Possibly. Time has no definition in Physics
and the concept of space has undergone many changing definitions.Ever heard of dimensions that are not accessible to our limited senses? Go and ask a physicist or a mathematischen.
Richard Dwakins has got some legitimate points.
The entire evolution of the Universe has nothing against the truth about/from God/Jesus (many parts from the Bible being told metaphorically, not literally, at those times people not having enough knowledge scientifically, but now we can fully understand the metaphors used). For example, the dust from which Adam and Eve have been created is representing their material bodies (parts of this material world), God giving spirit to those material bodies. Eve made from Adam's rib is referring to the X chromosome from the XY.
Therefore, Adam and Eve are representing the first hominids species chosen by God to place *the immortal spirits* (cast out from Heaven) and that is why Abel killed by Cain are representing the Neanderthals (Abel) extinct by the Homo Sapiens (Cain). People from many thousands of years ago, when Genesis was written, could not understand exactly (scientifically) how God has created everything, including their ancestors.
Just as billions of cells are needed for us to live this earthly life, in a similar way are required billions of galaxies for the intelligent life to be hosted intentionally to have 100% freedom, like humans on Earth. *Think how wonderful the Creator is, the opposite of a dictator, to create this reality in this way, with 100% freedom. He has told us to live in freedom but to not use freedom as a cover-up for evil.*
Unfortunately, Satan, the fallen angels, respectively their tools in this world - the evil=stupid humans - have used (are using) the freedom offered by God to do evil intentionally. However, all will be judged 100% correctly by God/Jesus and all will receive what they deserve.
Therefore, atheists are deceived because evolution is not an argument against God's existence because the entire process until humans time proves the existence of God, *the results of a process proving the intelligence involved into that process* and because *from no intelligence involved, no intelligence comes.*
Furthermore, the conventional biological evolution is hiding the facts about Satan and the other fallen angels who, according to the "Parable of the weeds", have altered this world, the DNA... (making the carnivores, the parasites, the viruses, bad bacteria etc....) to sustain the useless suffering while, initially, all insects, animals etc. were feeding only with plants (plants products, such as fruits, nectar, seeds etc.).
The fallen angels, being sadistic, have altered the DNA of most living things (including us) to do as default both: reproduce uncontrollably (as much as they can) and fight (kill) each other. Unfortunately, they love to see living things suffering, especially human beings suffering.
Because any child is a chance for a soul to escape hell, they want to destroy us since our physical body conception (all the time in any way possible). That is why they make us suffer, as much as possible, by using our stupidity and the stupidity of the other people around us.
Regarding the manipulation through fake science, anyone can read online the Scientific American article titled: "Is Lawrence Krauss a Physicist, or Just a Bad Philosopher?" (about his book: "A Universe from nothing")
I mention here just few quotations: "He [Lawrence Krauss] is presenting untested speculative theories of how things came into existence out of a pre-existing complex of entities, including variational principles, quantum field theory, specific symmetry groups, a bubbling vacuum, all the components of the standard model of particle physics, and so on. He does not explain in what way these entities could have pre-existed the coming into being of the universe, why they should have existed at all, or why they should have had the form they did. And he gives no experimental or observational process whereby we could test these vivid speculations of the supposed universe-generation mechanism. How indeed can you test what existed before the universe existed? You can t."
*Horgan:* Larry, I'll always be grateful to you for helping bring me up to speed on modern cosmology 22 years ago when I was researching an article for Scientific American. And what's disappointing is that, apart from the discovery of the acceleration of the cosmic expansion, which was certainly a big surprise, nothing has really changed since then. You and/or your popularizing colleagues--Hawking, Greene, Kaku, Susskind--are still marketing various unsubstantiated versions of inflation, multiverse theories, string theory, vacuum energy, anthropic principle, etc. What's ironic is that, although you don't have any more evidence for these speculations, your marketing of them has become more aggressive... and yet you accuse ME of hype.
*Krauss:* John first, I didn't make any definitive claims.. and I get offended when people claim I make such.. second I tried to indicate how much has changed in the last 22 years.. that is the purpose of the book.. things are dramatically different than they were then, and I went through a very careful analysis to describe these changes..... the analysis of fluctuations in the CMB, the discovery that the universe is flat.. these are REAL empirical discoveries that both impact upon and add credence to many of our ideas.
*Horgan:* Larry, so you're saying that you're not claiming to have answered the question posed by your book's title? You're just tossing some ideas around, and you don't expect anyone to take them too seriously? OK, that's a useful clarification. It also means that things have not progressed in the last 22 years, in spite of what you just asserted. I think you better tell Dawkins, before he embarrasses himself further.
Love this channel
Yes it is good.
Great spreader of lies 🤥
Love this Devil-dude (?)
@@kofidan9128🙏❤️
It does great disservice to Dawkins to say he "destroyed" these people who were willing to discuss their differing views. He gives rational arguments, and from what I can see, he is careful to qualify his views, so as not to state things as facts if they are just strongly supported suppositions. Any true scientist is fully aware that you cannot scientifically disprove the existence of a god or gods, because it falls squarely into the category of things which cannot be falsified with certainty.
question is, do you have to disprove this existence, I think there's enough logic to rule out the sanity behind the worship of such a god... without evidence the existence of a god is like a broken clock, it might or might not tell the right time twice per day, but you have no way of telling when, so what would be the point in entertaining this existence? How do you even begin to truthfully do things that you know for sure this entity will reward you for? also the existence of a god, a soul and an afterlife are a failed hypothesis, entertaining the existence of this construct never yielded any next steps, any progress, we're still debating the mere existence where science uncovered many other things that can be built on and yield useful results.
Theists love to use the whole "real scientists know they can't disprove God" pseudointellectual nonsense. Real scientists also know they can't determine the true state of Schrodinger's cat without direct observation either. They also can't disprove the existence of magical pocket gnomes that tangle your headphones.
@@0pct-Zscrop2-bcue7im9a.4space There is nothing nonsensical about the statement that true scientists know they can't disprove God. It's well supported by the conventional structure of the scientific method, which true scientists adhere to.
I am not a theist, I am agnostic, not that it matters to the substance of the argument at hand.
The point of Schrodinger's cat wasn't whether you could determine its true state without direct observation. The point was that the cat existed in both states at once, alive and dead, until you observed it, at which time it resolved itself into one state or the other.
And Schrodinger wasn't using that analogy in support of that notion, but to ridicule the interpretation of quantum mechanics that particles exist in a state of superposition until they are observed, even passively.
And that was my main point, that Dawkins appears to be a true scientist who adheres to that philosophy of science and epistemology. It is to his credit as a scientist. I don't think he is out to "destroy" anybody, but rather to have a rational discussion about this interesting question.
And regardless of any opinion I might have about their views, I think it is to the credit of any theists who invited him to do so. Good for them, for not hiding in their corner and confining themselves to their echo chamber. I like to think this is Dawkins feeling as well, judging from how he seems to comport himself as a sincere seeker of the truth, however elusive that truth might be.
"Do not create (make up) entities beyond necessity." William of Ockham (Christian monk), 14-th century "AD".
Many people seem to not realize that for God (the Creator of everything, including time) not being bounded by what He has created, being _"the beginning and the end,"_ *this world has already ended* (all free human choices / deeds being recorded for what all will perceive as the Last Judgment). That is why God knows the using of our free will.
That is why the Bible has exact prophecies, like the followings listed below:
- The future will be like in the days of Sodom. Luke 17, 28 30
- People will deny that GOD has created the universe. 2 Peter 3:3-9
- The message of the Gospel will reach all the nations. Matthew 24,14
- The future will become frightening. Luke 21, 26 (just few examples: the global warming terrific effects, the third world war final preparations, Corona virus etc.)
- Blasphemy and wicked behavior will be commonplace. 2 Timothy 3,1-9
- There will be money hungry preachers that deceive Christians and lead them away from the truth. 2 Peter 2,1-3
- Scoffers will mock also the Second Coming by claiming these signs have always been around. 2 Peter 3, 3 4
The question the evolutionist can't answer:
*_"Which evolved first? Sexual orgasm, or the urge for sexual orgasm?"_*
If you say: "sexual orgasm", explain how a sexual orgasm can result without a preceding urge for it.
If you say: "the urge for sexual orgasm", explain how the urge for sexual orgasm can arise in someone without that someone having come into existence via sexual orgasm.
Good luck. You'll need it.
There are actually answers if you bothered to research it. Simply Google it.
Your fourth sentence assumes sexual orgasm is necessary for a human to come into existence: bet you're a bloke, because conception can and does happen in the absence of female orgasm.
You’re misunderstanding how long evolution takes. Sexual reproduction and orgasms in humans are mega annum apart. Humans are so developed that I’m now talking to you through my phone with scrip that has existed for millennia, the need for sex for any other reason than reproduction is a sign of how far we have evolved. We as a species are so evolved we now enjoy a task that was only ever designed to keep us existing. How bloody complicated are we. Yet religion tells us to be ashamed of such acts. Denial is a hard thing to accept you’ve been lied to all your life.
@@Danfrank24 Answer the question. One more chance.
@@lawrence1318 Neither. You’re trying to reduce a deep seated question into one word. Evolution doesn’t work like that. Do you think there was ever a first homo sapein just born from a homo erectus mother? It really doesn’t work like that. I don’t need good luck because I’m capable of understanding things you’re clearly not. I was told never to argue with idiots because they never realise they’ve lost. Good evening.
Just find this channel.........love it
Full of lies 😂
Your fancy darwin talk 😂😂😂
Darwin is a christian.
Why are you atacking your own?
What part of it is fancy?
@@youtubestudiosucks978did you watch the video?
@@damienschwass9354 what did you do to comment? I still remmeber it.
I called Darwin a christian.
That doesnt include any banned words. Let my comment stay, stop flagging me, you meanie
@@damienschwass9354 enough to trigger the higherups of youtube so much that they auto delete half my comments just so that they can still believe.
I'm too full of myself to delete my comments and it dissapeared. It wasnt me.
Someone wrote:
"Science has taken aeroplane into sky
Religion has taken aeroplane into building"
CORRECTION: It was American democracy that took aeroplane into building.
There’s not a lot going on in your life is there?
@@koalaplays8855 Ah! so glad someone asked, just know that I am grateful, working hard enough to live a good life.
if a religious person has a very sick child, they take them to a scientifically trained doctor. when the child is cured thanks to science, the family thank God, instead of the Doctor!! Why don't they just take the child to the church in the first place? is it perhaps that their all powerful God wouldn't have a clue what to do. And why would he/she have created illness in the first place.? keep up the good work x
if you think that's what Christianity is about, then you're horribly ill informed. No wonder you're not a believer. Who says belief in God requires rejection of science?
The very founding fathers of modern science believed in God. Newton, Kepler, Babbage, and others. What's more, it was their belief in God that drove their scientific work. Science and God are not opposed to each other. They complement each other. Dawkins has woefully miseducated you.
Besides, without God having created the universe as he did (with its scientific laws) there'd be no universe in which science could be done at all, including medicine.
As for the existence of illness, Adam and Eve explains that and all other such things. It's a broken world, hence heaven.
@@kofidan9128 The great scientists of centuries ago set out to find god but found science instead. That's why today we use science instead of prayer or magic to make things happen. Science is about progression, and we have now progressed well beyond god magic in science. U are such a dirty POS.
@@kofidan9128 "god created the universe" ......thats just a claim
This is your assumption about a "religious person". In reality they would've thanked the doctor and then thanked God in their prayers. What's so funny about that?
@@delayedcreator4783 I could give you proof. But in my experience, atheists are not looking for proof. They just want to enjoy their atheism while occasionally engaging in banter. I kinda get it though
Go Richard! As an atheist I love your fight.
Which fight? He couldn't even generate any truth claim without appealing to an omnicient, omnipotent being. He can't know truth for certain without God, so everything he says could be false. What kinda fight is that, if you go to battle without any armor?
@@HenryDalcke Fight against dogmatism and ignorance which ruled the human population for millennia and which are responsible for hundreds of millions of human lives.
"He couldn't even generate any truth claim without appealing to an omnicient, omnipotent being." Of course he can, ANYBODY can. I didn't appealed to any silly fictional god for majority of my life, I don't even consider any god for literally anything, it's totally poinless, useless, irrational topic. I don't even know anybody who does that.
"He can't know truth for certain without God" Truth is there is no evidence for any god. Truth is gods are most likely pure fiction, evidence suggest that prety clearly. I can give you couple paragraphs with summary why is that.
"so everything he says could be false" Thing is he never ever said "gods don't exists". 😀He just talk about beliefs, religion, and humanity under theistic dogma. Everything he says can be verified or refuted with evidence, anyone can do that yet nobody ever did. I wonder why.
@@HenryDalckewhat are you talking about?
@@JonDrake1 In order to generate an argument, you have to presuppose the universal, eternal laws of logic, certain knowledge, objective truth, consciousness and a way to conceptualize what's real. How does Dawkins derive that from a worldview without God?
Yeah, needlessly fighting truth
But he did not prove anything.
*Complicity in the Holocaust: Churches and Universities in Nazi Germany*
Demonstrates how many German church leaders and academics enthusiastically embraced Nazism and provided rationalizations that encouraged ordinary Germans to accept and participate in the regime’s policies. Includes footnotes, a bibliography, and an index.
- United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
Well said
I believe the the Holy Trinity of Mathematics, Science and Engineering.
But there are mathematicians who say mathematics leads to God.what about them?
@@maryamshahbaz9725 That is their opinion - it has little to do with Maths, or the opinion of other mathematicians. Most modern scientists and mathematicians do not are Atheists. Newton was very religious and so was Darwin, until he discovered evidence of evolution. Chances are that, if Newton had been around after Darwin had made his discoveries, he would have changed his mind. Einstein was raised in the Jewish faith, but later concluded that there cannot be a god that is interested in our welfare.
Have you asked yourself why there's a universe in which math can be done at all?
He didn't destroy them. He made them double down on their faith. You can only open up a religious person little by little, one neuron at a time, not by brute force. Scientists should finally use science in spreading science to religious audiences.
Taps the chair, -
"I've felt God's presence as solidly as this "
The chair is a matrix of particles held together by energy. It isn't solid.
God does not need to be solid either.
@@irenehartlmayr8369 Not quite the point.
@@ploppysonofploppy6066 O really ? The point is that God is not material. And intelligent people know that . Or do you expect that everything must be material ?
@@irenehartlmayr8369 No. The solidity of the chair is an illusion.
So is god. Isn't it?
@@ploppysonofploppy6066 Proove that !!
It amazes me that the christian argujing in this vidoe actually thinks that he makes sense. The bible condones slavery. "Well yes, but many would say that the bible also inspired the end of slavery". Okay, but it still codones it. Several times in fact. Who cares if someone twisted their understanding of the scriptures to siit their modern eorld view?
This is why they can't be debated. They will never come from a point of logic.
That is what atheists do.....Twist everything to suit their " modern world view " without any intelligent understanding of the texts they are challenging....
again wishywashy christian compromises do not disprove the word of god, just means we need to go old testament to please the big man
@@josmith9662 I'm confused by what you are trying to say. Concerning whether or not the god of Christianity is real, I could easily go on all day pointing out countless contradictions in the Bible, but before I get into that since we were talking about slavery, please give me a straight yes or no answer to whether you condone slavery? The law of Moses condones buying a slave, owning them for life (unless they are a Jewish male slave, then they might go free after 6 years, but the women and foreign bought slaves never go free), and beating them freely even to the point of injury because they are "property". But having pointed this out I have never managed to get a Christian to give a straight yes or no answer to the question "Is slavery is okay?". Perhaps you will be the first Christian to answer this question without dodging it. Do you believe that slavery as defined by God in the law of Moses is morally okay?
I've got an imaginary friend, i know he is fictional. I invented him to amuse me
*MATERIALISM* contradicts itself and proves *God*
1. Materialism assumes reality is composed of only MATTER and ENERGY
2. INFORMATION is always instantiated in or on matter or energy
3. So materialists assume information originates from mass + energy
4. But from Claude Shannon information is a COMMUNICATION of MEANING ENCODED in a LANGUAGE
5. But language only comes from a MIND
6. So matter + energy cannot be the source of information
7. Therefore the origin of information can only be a mind
8. Therefore if nature includes information we know it originated from a mind
9. DNA's only function is to store, transmit and copy information
10. Therefore that mind must be outside of our reality ie *GOD!*
I believe in the bible. Well, the parts I agree with.
I do not believe one single word of it. It's all bollocks.
Don’t worry, I get your humor lol
@fionagregory9147 good for u. Ur absolutely correct. If religion was abolished, this world would become so much more fun.
@thebuffalo2263 glad to see some folks do🤣🤣👻✌️
Believing in its message and believing that it's true are two different things.
Religion is about control. Punishment for disobedience, usually after death and reward for obedience, again, usually after death.
Fear, guilt and one's money. Believe or ELSE! Religious blackmail.
It is impossible to destroy truth. What if Richard Dawkins met an Angel.
If not for religion, mankind would be 1000 years more advanced then we are now. There was a pause due to religion, of intellectual thought, during the medieval period which lasted from about the 5th century to the 15th century.
@@rogerjamespaul5528 Congratiluations: You just made every single modern historian cringe. Seriously, this notion of a dark age where the church halted scientific progress needs to die. It's complete bullshit.
@@tezz2698 From the perspective of a Christian Zealot it would appear to be BS.
@@tezz2698 Some seeds of modern science dropped into the ground when the flower of Graeco-Roman learning withered. A few survived even the ignorance and superstition of the worst period of the Dark Ages; but for centuries conditions did not favour their growth.
@@tezz2698 Scientific, artistic, architectural, medical and historical knowledge were all greatly diminished during the Dark Ages. This was because literacy went into decline. Therefore, people had very little use for texts on these subjects.
The cultural Christian speaks?
What does this even mean lad😂
I’ve listened to to Dawkins for the express purpose of hearing a decent anti God argument and so far I am throughly unimpressed. He’s 3 rd grade.
That's because you don't understand them.
Richard Dawkins roasting himself 😂