I am utterly amazed watching these videos...i am a 50 year old guy who was never good in math and science but have an overabundance of curiosity about how things work. I feel lucky to live in a time where i can look anything up on youtube and get some undestanding about how the physical world works around me. Also, i had no idea how involved pumps were...meaning the engineering behind the pump.
I have been working for more than 10 years as rotating engineer in water treatment plant and offshore oil n gas industry where the pump require either ANSI or API 610 type. But for me, this uncle has produced one of the best explanation in youtube and easy to be understood by our normal people in the world
Feel like this prof is more like a coach, you don't wanna let him down. I bet students work their tail off for him because he's engaged in the learning process.
47:42, when Q=0, Hs=150. But how at increased flow rate Q=500, Hs is also increasing to 150.5? Because according to the curve at increased flow rate head decreases. Isn't it?
I left my class for this topic,but luckily i found this video,it's about 2 days bfr exam,,i watched it,,excellent lecture,,hope my final exam become good
Thanks for your effort. One tip though, unlike the case in the pump sketch you showed, for centrifugal pumps and compressors, the suction side is always one standard size larger than the discharge size. This is to minimize losses and, consequently, reduce cavitation possibilities.
No problem. We are starting to add time stamps to the lecture series to make it easier for viewers to find exactly what they need. Hopefully the timestamps will save people a lot of time and frustration.
The equation provided to calculate delta z based on NPSH is for the case that the water level at the supply reservoir is below the water level at the demand reservoir. So, for the case which is shown in the video, the water level at the downstream reservoir should be lower than that the water level at point 1 and for this case: delta z (minimum water level difference between two reservoirs)= (Pa-Pv)/gamma - NPSH (for available pump) -HL (all head losses) as shown in the video. It is not surprising that if the difference in water levels reduced to values less than delta Z, cavitation is expected to take place. For the other case if the water level at the demand or downstream reservoir is greater than the water level at supply reservoir (most cases), delta Z (Max different in water levels)= NPSH (of the available pump)- (Pa-Pv)/gamma +HL (all head losses) and in this case if the water level at supply reservoir or the well is dropped to lower depth, than the difference in the water levels increased to values more than computed delta Z and we expect cavitation will take place in this situation.
this is great info, I'm studying for my next wastewater certification and notice a few differences. Total dynamic head and Head in general is always referd to as the verticle distance the water has to be pumed (measured in feet). But it sounds like head is just any force acting to restrict flow? Also Cavitaion is described only happening at the impeller near the inlet or outlet and not in the pipe itself. this is due to the pressure difference across the impeller. the bubbles are formed by rapid pressure loss and on implotion they take part of the impeller with them and they sound like BBs in the pump. again, great video. i enjoyed getting away from the text book for a bit.
Check me out but at 25:10 the 101kpa makes it 101,0000 Pa which is NPSH is 7.4 METERS then that makes sense with the whole equation to make the units workout. But he wrote that vapor pressure is 1666 kPa and then out it in the equation as that value so there's a mistake on that one way or the other. Either it was incorrectly labeled with the kPa units initially or he should've left the Patm in 101 kPa form and converted later. Can someone confirm?
Thank you for your lacture.. I learnt a lot and but why the H vs Q curve by manufacturer is decreasing while system head curve is increasing..However, I know, at 0 flow, head will be maximum and if flow will increase, head will be go down because pressure will be reduced but please make me clear on what basis or data manufacturer plot H vs Q.
Thank you sir for the explannation, it helped understand the fundamentals better. Also, I would like to add a note on vapor pressure. Vapor pressure of Water @ 15degC unit shall be read in Pa (i.e 1666 Pa)
Hi teacher I would like to thank you for your wonderful explanation and I want to know why in the pump efficiency chart, when the height increases, the discharge decreases,please
Would cavitation also occur if boiling coolant (car's cooling system) is flowing through the pump? Pump would be at the lowest point in the system. I'm really curious about this
Thank you for the great video. I have a question about the effect of temperature on the characteristics curve of the pump. How does the characteris curve of a centrifugal pump change with the decrease in temperature provided that the pump power is constant. A reference material to read would of great help. Thank you
Thanks for some great videos! This is probably a shot in the dark, but could anyone help me reference to the book he is using. I’m in the middle of a thesis but I cant seem to find alot of good theoretical references on the subject.
Raise the fluid temperature to change viscosity, density? (Not practical but I'm an electronic guy working at a farm and my boss keeps trying to make me do things that are not correct. My solution, learn about fluid dynamics on my own, not to be right but to respect energy and knowledge). Thank you professor, much respect for your life's work, reminding me as always I am standing on the shoulders of giants
great tutorial for a EE....At 25.00 regarding NPSH, visually the water tank is below the pump, the Z is the height between the two. How would the analysis change, if the pump was below and the water tank was above? I would think the ABS | Patm -Pv | may be a more general solution to avoid an answer with a -Z value.
No, because NPSH changes with the change of Q. The higher is the flow rate, the higher is the pressure drop at the suction side. Therefore it's rather used to get to know the maximum flow rate available. Also the temperature plays the key role, since it influences the vapor pressure.
Is there a theoretical derivation for the shape of a pump curve? I guessed maybe a centrifugal pump imparts constant energy per unit mass to whatever fluid passes through it. Then you'd get E = constant (for any given fluid density) = P + (1/2)dv^2 (d is density), or h = E/(dg) - Q^2/(2gA^2). This has the shape of an upside down parabola (right basic shape), but when I try to compare it to real pump curves, the real curves turn downwards something on the order of 100 times faster than my theoretical model. Do you know why this might be? Am I making some unit conversion error, or is the whole thought process just wrong? If the real pump curves turned down something like 10-50% faster than the theoretical one, I'd be happy, because I guess the pump doesn't conserve energy perfectly and it doesn't have the same efficiency at all operating ranges. But getting a result 10,000% different than the theory is unsatisfying.
I have a question, If a centrifugal pump flow limit is from 60 LPM to 535 LPM at 3500 rpm, does the low flow limit of 60 LPM changes with running the pump at lower rpm? Does this limit changes goes down when we run the pump at lower rpm?
Surely changing the flow rate from 60 LPM to 535 LPM would mean a change of impeller, assuming constant rpm. If you have a 60 LPM impeller, on a 3500 rpm motor, and you reduce the speed of the motor - the flow rate will reduce.
It was great👍 thank you so much, but I should say the teacher made a tiny mistake, at the end of the video he wrote Q=V/A, actually it is wrong and the correct formula is Q=A.V
Hello, could anyone tell me how pump curve is determined at a certain speed however the input power = ( torque x angular velocity). so, to get more discharge we need more input power by increasing velocity and then by applying the efficiency formula (output power / input power) we can draw an efficiency curve. so, how this curve could be at a certain velocity?
please Sir If the inlet fluid is subcold ( at low temperature ) but the liquid is entering the pump at low pressure and the impeller will start swirling the liquid and create bubbles just as when you move your hand quickly on water surface you will create water bubbles though the inlet pressure is above the vapor pressure is that possible
Thank you so much for the excellent lecture prof. I have one question: why the efficiency form on previous graph is different from those of pump performance map?
Dear Prof! speaking about elevation of the pump above reservoir surface you said: Well, as you get the pump higher and higher in the flow rate, that pressure is going to start drop. I think that could be: Well, as you get the pump higher and higher in the elevation, that pressure is going to start drop. What do you think about that? Thank you very much.
Professor: why is the velocity difference between point 1 and 2 very small? Shouldn’t the velocity at point 2 be very high because impeller blade is pushing the liquid and velocity should increase significantly.
The pump definitely provides Kinetic energy to the water which intutively make us think the increase in velocity of flow at outlet, but because of volute casing of pump that kinetic energy of fluid gets converted into pressure energy. Thus the velocity remains same. Moreover velocity is governed by the pipe diameter. Since pipe diameter at inlet and outlet of pump is assumed to be same and flow rate also going to be same to maintain steady state ( because whatever amount of water is entering , the same amount of water will move out of pump). Hope it will help!!
Great class. One would intuitively think that the velocity of the fluid at the discharge of the pump is higher than the suction velocity. Apparently, this is not true, because the professor is neglecting that difference. I would like to understand better the reason behind it. Any advice?
Near 31st minute: It seems, we put g instead of 9.81 [m/s^2] in the N's formula JUST TO MAKE THE FORMULA VALID ON THE MOON. On the moon, g is small, the pump head H is big, hence g*H is the same as on earth.
I am utterly amazed watching these videos...i am a 50 year old guy who was never good in math and science but have an overabundance of curiosity about how things work. I feel lucky to live in a time where i can look anything up on youtube and get some undestanding about how the physical world works around me. Also, i had no idea how involved pumps were...meaning the engineering behind the pump.
We feel lucky to live in a time where it is possible to leverage our efforts to help others well-beyond the classroom.
@@CPPMechEngTutorials thank you for your posts. I feel lost sometimes watching these things but rely on osmosis. Knowledge helps us all thanks
I have been working for more than 10 years as rotating engineer in water treatment plant and offshore oil n gas industry where the pump require either ANSI or API 610 type. But for me, this uncle has produced one of the best explanation in youtube and easy to be understood by our normal people in the world
Am over 2 years in pump industry as engineer. Splendid, crystal clear sir. Thank you.
Feel like this prof is more like a coach, you don't wanna let him down. I bet students work their tail off for him because he's engaged in the learning process.
Never let Prof. Biddle down... NEVER!
Great lecture, remembering when I was in university. Now I work in small business servicing pump, and this lecture is realy helpfull. Thanks Prof
We're glad it was helpful.
Excellent lecture, Dr. Biddle. My professor doesn't even try to explain and solve these problems. Thank you very much.
Thanks!
47:42, when Q=0, Hs=150. But how at increased flow rate Q=500, Hs is also increasing to 150.5? Because according to the curve at increased flow rate head decreases. Isn't it?
I left my class for this topic,but luckily i found this video,it's about 2 days bfr exam,,i watched it,,excellent lecture,,hope my final exam become good
It is crazy how I can watch those lessons for free. Thank you very much.
The world is a crazy place. :)
If you try and do the math on minute 44:48, on the replacement of V, Q=AV, so you should have V=Q/A. Thus, V=4Q/(pi*D^2). V=4Q/pi with D=1.
Yup. We put that message in the comments.
should i square it like the v?
This is a beautiful culmination of my pumps course. the clarity of it brings tears to my eyes.
Muchas gracias. Excelente explicación. I am an electrical engineer and these concepts are very useful for me. Thank you very much.
I haven't enjoyed a lecture as i have enjoyed this one!👏🏾👏🏾
Thanks for your effort. One tip though, unlike the case in the pump sketch you showed, for centrifugal pumps and compressors, the suction side is always one standard size larger than the discharge size. This is to minimize losses and, consequently, reduce cavitation possibilities.
Thanks for the tip.
All I can say is brilliant and thank you.
Thank you for sharing!!
Our pleasure.
Thanks for including time stamps in these videos!
No problem. We are starting to add time stamps to the lecture series to make it easier for viewers to find exactly what they need. Hopefully the timestamps will save people a lot of time and frustration.
What a great teacher! I am electrical engineer but just enjoy listening and understanding...
I got an exam tomorrow. My prof sucks. You are great. Thank you
This professor is a legend, I wish I had him as teacher at University 😮
There can be only one Professor Biddle.
It´s such an amazing class, thank you so much for this video , I got a brief summary about centrifugal pumps which I learned through the university.
Appreciated the clear explanations and real-world practical focus.
Thanks!
I have a quick question in minute 49:19 how did he get those operating points. Is there a way to calculate it?
This video is great, a lot of good information presented in a clear manner. Thanks!
Our pleasure!
Great Teacher ,nice channel, improve my listening and English on engineering.
Excellent Lecture. Pretty Understandable
The equation provided to calculate delta z based on NPSH is for the case that the water level at the supply reservoir is below the water level at the demand reservoir. So, for the case which is shown in the video, the water level at the downstream reservoir should be lower than that the water level at point 1 and for this case: delta z (minimum water level difference between two reservoirs)= (Pa-Pv)/gamma - NPSH (for available pump) -HL (all head losses) as shown in the video. It is not surprising that if the difference in water levels reduced to values less than delta Z, cavitation is expected to take place. For the other case if the water level at the demand or downstream reservoir is greater than the water level at supply reservoir (most cases), delta Z (Max different in water levels)= NPSH (of the available pump)- (Pa-Pv)/gamma +HL (all head losses) and in this case if the water level at supply reservoir or the well is dropped to lower depth, than the difference in the water levels increased to values more than computed delta Z and we expect cavitation will take place in this situation.
This is very useful for engineering student thank you sir😍👍👍
Thank Prof for the great lectures!
this is great info, I'm studying for my next wastewater certification and notice a few differences. Total dynamic head and Head in general is always referd to as the verticle distance the water has to be pumed (measured in feet). But it sounds like head is just any force acting to restrict flow?
Also Cavitaion is described only happening at the impeller near the inlet or outlet and not in the pipe itself. this is due to the pressure difference across the impeller. the bubbles are formed by rapid pressure loss and on implotion they take part of the impeller with them and they sound like BBs in the pump.
again, great video. i enjoyed getting away from the text book for a bit.
Thanks a lot Dr Biddle for sharing this is a really helpfull !
Glad it helped!
Check me out but at 25:10 the 101kpa makes it 101,0000 Pa which is NPSH is 7.4 METERS then that makes sense with the whole equation to make the units workout.
But he wrote that vapor pressure is 1666 kPa and then out it in the equation as that value so there's a mistake on that one way or the other. Either it was incorrectly labeled with the kPa units initially or he should've left the Patm in 101 kPa form and converted later.
Can someone confirm?
Yeah exactly. Patm is 101 kPa and the Pv at 15C according to the steam tables is equal to 1.7 kPa.
@@dawidpietrucha5333 lol too long ago I can't tell if you're agreeing or disagreeing
He's agreeing....
Thank you very much . Very helpful lecture videos.
LEGEND Dr. Biddle
Thank you for your lacture.. I learnt a lot and but why the H vs Q curve by manufacturer is decreasing while system head curve is increasing..However, I know, at 0 flow, head will be maximum and if flow will increase, head will be go down because pressure will be reduced but please make me clear on what basis or data manufacturer plot H vs Q.
Very much interesting and informative lecture. Thank you Professor.
Best lecturer. Thanks
Great class, what's the professor's name?, he mentions 'his book' and I'd like to check it out....thanks CPPMechEngTutorials guys !
dear DR.
AT 45 MIN there is a little error Q=VA so V=Q/A SO it well be V=Q 4/ π D^2
thanks lot ...
He assumed D = 1
You're right.
Hey it would be great if the handout was posted for this video.
Thank you very much sir... really appreciate it 🙏...
my supervisor recommend this video i was in search of topic for research.
Excellent lecture
Thank you sir for the explannation, it helped understand the fundamentals better. Also, I would like to add a note on vapor pressure. Vapor pressure of Water @ 15degC unit shall be read in Pa (i.e 1666 Pa)
Hi teacher
I would like to thank you for your wonderful explanation
and I want to know why in the pump efficiency chart, when the height increases, the discharge decreases,please
Just to confirm that Axial flow Pump is also one of the types of the Centrifugal Pump, for Example of Between Bearing BB1 API 610 Centrifugal Pump
Great lecture, Thanks Professor.
Would cavitation also occur if boiling coolant (car's cooling system) is flowing through the pump? Pump would be at the lowest point in the system. I'm really curious about this
Great explanation, thanks, what is the textbook used?
Thank you sir for sharing this valuable informations !
Great lecture indeed but I'm confused where did the professor get 175 and 140ft to generate the pump head curve?
Beautiful Class Thanks Prof
Thank you for the great video. I have a question about the effect of temperature on the characteristics curve of the pump.
How does the characteris curve of a centrifugal pump change with the decrease in temperature provided that the pump power is constant.
A reference material to read would of great help.
Thank you
I can tell you that increasing tempreture will increase the risque of cavitation; unfortunantlly i don't know really it's effect on HQ curve.
Thanks for some great videos! This is probably a shot in the dark, but could anyone help me reference to the book he is using. I’m in the middle of a thesis but I cant seem to find alot of good theoretical references on the subject.
Excellent explanation
When you run the pump at a constant speed, how do you increase the flowrate through the pump?
Open the flow control valve downstream from the pump.
Raise the fluid temperature to change viscosity, density? (Not practical but I'm an electronic guy working at a farm and my boss keeps trying to make me do things that are not correct. My solution, learn about fluid dynamics on my own, not to be right but to respect energy and knowledge). Thank you professor, much respect for your life's work, reminding me as always I am standing on the shoulders of giants
Change the impeller size as per manufacturers impeller data
@@CPPMechEngTutorials
Awesome
great tutorial for a EE....At 25.00 regarding NPSH, visually the water tank is below the pump, the Z is the height between the two. How would the analysis change, if the pump was below and the water tank was above? I would think the ABS | Patm -Pv | may be a more general solution to avoid an answer with a -Z value.
How to find his lectures about Turbine & compressor
love this subject 😊
We love it too!
Is NPSH used for the single purpose of determining the maximum elevation which the liquid can be raised?
No, because NPSH changes with the change of Q. The higher is the flow rate, the higher is the pressure drop at the suction side. Therefore it's rather used to get to know the maximum flow rate available.
Also the temperature plays the key role, since it influences the vapor pressure.
Great professor. Thank you
How can we calculate the flow rate of a split type centrifugal pump if we know the refrigerant flow rate through the chiller's evaporator?
Hello Sir,
Can you drive the specific speed formoula?
How we have got the range for every type?
Dr. Biddle, Good day to you. Which textbook are you using?
on NPSH example problem, Patm defined by value of 101000 kPa. Should it be valued 101 kPa if Pv also in kPa? CMIIW
Yes you're right. He denoted it with the coma. However the value of Pv at 15C according to my steam table is equal to 1,7 kPa.
@@dawidpietrucha5333 Same, from Table A.5 in the class textbook, interpolating you'd get 1.782 kPa for vapor pressure.
Informative and pretty good.
Is there a theoretical derivation for the shape of a pump curve?
I guessed maybe a centrifugal pump imparts constant energy per unit mass to whatever fluid passes through it. Then you'd get E = constant (for any given fluid density) = P + (1/2)dv^2 (d is density), or h = E/(dg) - Q^2/(2gA^2). This has the shape of an upside down parabola (right basic shape), but when I try to compare it to real pump curves, the real curves turn downwards something on the order of 100 times faster than my theoretical model. Do you know why this might be? Am I making some unit conversion error, or is the whole thought process just wrong?
If the real pump curves turned down something like 10-50% faster than the theoretical one, I'd be happy, because I guess the pump doesn't conserve energy perfectly and it doesn't have the same efficiency at all operating ranges. But getting a result 10,000% different than the theory is unsatisfying.
Thank you sir.. I like ur way
What a great teacher, where do you teach, i want to join one of your classes
Sorry. Only Cal Poly Pomona students are supposed to be in the classroom.
may i know which textbook you guys used? and where can i get the copy?
How do you arrive to the equation which include the term Hp?
I just want to know that shouldn't the peak of efficiency be below the horsepower curve?
how can we increase Q at constant V ? Area? I mean with velocity diagrams we can calculate everything then why we need graphs for?
Since Q = VA, we cannot increase Q at constant V (assuming the fluid is incompressible).
For centrifugal pumps and compressors, the suction side is always one standard size larger than the discharge size. So yes, area will be a factor.
Sir what will happen if pump is run at very low head than rated head... There will be low efficiency i know. What other practical problems will occur.
Which textbook does he use?
I have a question,
If a centrifugal pump flow limit is from 60 LPM to 535 LPM at 3500 rpm, does the low flow limit of 60 LPM changes with running the pump at lower rpm? Does this limit changes goes down when we run the pump at lower rpm?
Surely changing the flow rate from 60 LPM to 535 LPM would mean a change of impeller, assuming constant rpm.
If you have a 60 LPM impeller, on a 3500 rpm motor, and you reduce the speed of the motor - the flow rate will reduce.
thank you very much professor!!!
You're welcome!!!
It was great👍 thank you so much, but I should say the teacher made a tiny mistake, at the end of the video he wrote Q=V/A, actually it is wrong and the correct formula is Q=A.V
Yup. That correction is already in the video notes.
Which Text book he is referring to?
Actually V=Q/A (Cross sectional area of pipe)
Well explained...thanks a lot
Where i can find the explaination of chapter 10 ?
Hello,
could anyone tell me how pump curve is determined at a certain speed however the input power = ( torque x angular velocity).
so, to get more discharge we need more input power by increasing velocity
and then by applying the efficiency formula (output power / input power) we can draw an efficiency curve.
so, how this curve could be at a certain velocity?
Great explains 👍
please Sir If the inlet fluid is subcold ( at low temperature ) but the liquid is entering the pump at low pressure and the impeller will start swirling the liquid and create bubbles just as when you move your hand quickly on water surface you will create water bubbles though the inlet pressure is above the vapor pressure is that possible
Thank you so much for the excellent lecture prof. I have one question: why the efficiency form on previous graph is different from those of pump performance map?
Yeahh, the same question crossed to my mind !!! Even I'm confused for it
Dear Prof! speaking about elevation of the pump above reservoir surface you said:
Well, as you get the pump higher and higher in the flow rate, that pressure is going to start drop.
I think that could be:
Well, as you get the pump higher and higher in the elevation, that pressure is going to start drop.
What do you think about that? Thank you very much.
please can you tell us the effects of no flow rate (valve closed on runing pump).
The pump may overheat since it is dumping lots of kinetic energy into water that is not flowing.
@@CPPMechEngTutorials thank you very much
Very good vid
The professor writes Q=V/A at 44:52, shouldn't it be Q=V*A?
Whoops! Great catch. I will put this in the video notes.
@@CPPMechEngTutorials CAN WE GET VIDEO NOTES PLEASE ??????
By "video notes" I mean the comments just underneath the video.
Professor: why is the velocity difference between point 1 and 2 very small? Shouldn’t the velocity at point 2 be very high because impeller blade is pushing the liquid and velocity should increase significantly.
The pump definitely provides Kinetic energy to the water which intutively make us think the increase in velocity of flow at outlet, but because of volute casing of pump that kinetic energy of fluid gets converted into pressure energy. Thus the velocity remains same. Moreover velocity is governed by the pipe diameter. Since pipe diameter at inlet and outlet of pump is assumed to be same and flow rate also going to be same to maintain steady state ( because whatever amount of water is entering , the same amount of water will move out of pump). Hope it will help!!
Thank you very much
Great class. One would intuitively think that the velocity of the fluid at the discharge of the pump is higher than the suction velocity. Apparently, this is not true, because the professor is neglecting that difference. I would like to understand better the reason behind it. Any advice?
Usually, suction pipe is one size higher than the discharge pipe size, hence the velocity in discharge pipe is higher than that of the suction pipe
Near 31st minute:
It seems, we put g instead of 9.81 [m/s^2] in the N's formula JUST TO MAKE THE FORMULA VALID ON THE MOON.
On the moon, g is small, the pump head H is big, hence g*H is the same as on earth.
do you have videos for closed loop system.
Some of the earlier videos in the lecture series involve the energy equation for pipes.
But what is the water horse power in Shark Power?
ΦΙΛΙΕ ΣΕ ΕΥΧΑΡΙΣΤΩ, ΔΕΣ ΠΩΣ ΚΑΝΟΥΝΕ ΜΑΘΗΜΑ ΣΕ ΠΑΡΑΚΑΛΩ. Do you know If I could find the document that was given to the students? Thank you
Love this defining of all abbreviations .... thats unfotunately not standart any more...
what is the textbook title which you kindly are using please?
That information is in the video notes.
Excelent explanation
Thanks
Thank you for sharing
Hi.tanks for this class. one mistake in calculating ouccer is Q=AV
Yup. That error was corrected in the show notes.