There is a slip of tongue and in the explanation of Sruthi Maata and layam pitaa around 2.50 mins of the slide, there is a correction. Right pitching is Sruthi and this is mother. The laya which is rhythm is father. The words got erroneously interchanged while recording 🙏🙏🙏 kindly note the correction.
Indian classical music traditionally used 22 Shrutis. Even in current music, all though we say 7 swaras, there are actually 12 swara sthana. Also, the music swraras were discovered using Veena using Shadaj-Madham gram calculation, therefore the traditional Swarasthan (as Hz frequency) were different than the tempered scale that is been used today even in Indian classical music. For example the Gandhar frequency in Vedic music would be different than it is today (even in Indian classical). Lastly, Indian music follows Murchana system which “relative”. therefore Dh-Ni-Sa is same as Ni-Sa-Re as far as swara distance matters. Also, we have variations of Nis and Dhas etc. so it changes when you use lower Ni.
இன் தமிழ் நாங்கள் பூனுல் என்று அழைப்போம். இடக்கலை, பின்கலை, சுமுழுனை. இதன் அர்த்தம் வடது கண் சூரியன், இடது கண் சந்திரன் இந்த இரண்டு இனைந்து சுழிமுனையாக மாரும். இந்த சுழிமுனை மூலமாக கையிலயம் சென்று இரைவனை தரிசிக்கலாம் ஃஃஃ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Ladies don’t have the right to learning Vedas as per sastras. People who are not eligible to learn benefit from them by just hearing unlike eligible men
Thank you Sir for teaching Vedic grammar.. however, i wish you could have pronounced Ved not Veda.. similarly Swar for swara, and Varn for varna.. we dont need to pronounce our indian words in western tones which adds unnecessary extra "aa" in most of our ancient words..
There's an अकार towards the end and not the हल्। वर्ण is best written and pronounced as varṇa and not as वर्ण् varṇ or वर्णा varṇā वर्ण= व्+ अ+ र् + ण् +अ
@@ganeshankk6520 similar problem i find in pronouncing name of gods and goddesses.. i think there is sanskrit grammar, according to which a female name ends with a vowel sound such as Shubha, Shudha, Pooja, Janki, Shiva (name of mother Parvati), Krishna (name of Draupadi), Nidhi etc. And male names doesnt end with a vowel (with few exceptions) such as Mahesh, Ganesh, Ram, Shyam, Kamal, Arun etc..
In today's Modern Bharat this knowledge should be taught compulsory to every Hindu child without taking his / her caste into account .It's really unfortunate that only particular caste, who considered themselves Pure Hindus ( which was Hindus worst stupidity ) kept this knowledge with them, didn't allowed any other Hindu ,treated them like animals called them Shudras ( which was again another Hindus worst stupidity )
Even in today's world why you are you attributing Veda learning to only one section of the society? If anyone wants to learn one should have strict decipline, dedication. Now just blaming one section you are loosing the great value of learning itself. Instead think broad and start learning. Veds never restricted to any cast. Ex Dhruva, Nachiketa, shabdavedi Ekalavya ,Kanaka Dasaru, SareefSahebaru why we are not following them?
Instead of calling stupid, start thinking broad U NO in 2003 accepted that Sanskrit is the best vocal card and memory developing tool in the world. Instead of writing so negatively just start telling Ganananantwa , correctly, it requires lot of patience, if learnt correctly it will give you mental peace. Within few days of learning correctly your thoughts and actions can be controlled without any difficulty. Go through above series in depth your life will change and will me more creative in your work whatever you are doing.Leave away the negatives and start learning .Wish you all the best.❤🎉
Dear Ignoramus of a nominal Hindu: Read the Valmiki Ramayana and Mahabharata instead of watching serials and TV masala of Ramanand Sagar and Starplus. Raama and Krishna and Arjuna were NOT brahmins. They were all knowers of Brahmaastra which is not possible without study of veda. It is explicitly mentioned in Valmiki Ramayana that Shri Raama was a Yajurvedin. Until 20 years back there was even a kShatriya who was a nitya-agnihotri. This is NOT possible without study of the veda. A shudra was one who did not study the veda so in that sense everyone irrespective of jaati who has not studied the veda is a shudra. No one was ever kept away from vedic knowledge. This itself is a wrong assumption on your part. Learning the veda however involves adoption of nityakarma (trikAla sandhyavandana, dvikAla agnikArya, brahmayajnam), mitaahara (vegetarian sattvic diet) and appropriate lifestyle (brahmacharya, yama/niyama etc). The study of the veda involves repeating after the Guru and practising the veda mantras over 9-10 hours every day for 8 to 12 years. And you do all of this without expectation of financial or other rewards. Are you capable of this? Get your basics right atleast before pontificating.
There is a slip of tongue and in the explanation of Sruthi Maata and layam pitaa around 2.50 mins of the slide, there is a correction.
Right pitching is Sruthi and this is mother. The laya which is rhythm is father. The words got erroneously interchanged while recording 🙏🙏🙏 kindly note the correction.
One period for Vedas reading should be fixed in schools and colleges for the interested students.
Namo namah. Only great Guru only can explain swaras in Vedas. Deserves listening again and again.
pranam.
Jai gurudev Shri guru parampara vijayantet RAAM .jai gurudev Jai maharishiji. Ananat Namaskar.
Very good topic. Well presented. Thanks
Thank you so much for the clear explanation
🙏🙏🙏very useful topic
Dhanyosmi 🙏
Very much important information❤
Great work, needed!
Excellent initiative sir
Very informative 🙏
🙏🏽
Worthy video with invaluable information.
Glad it was helpful!
Good one thanks
Dhanyavadaha 🙏🙏🙏
Super🎉🎉🎉🎉
Indian classical music traditionally used 22 Shrutis. Even in current music, all though we say 7 swaras, there are actually 12 swara sthana.
Also, the music swraras were discovered using Veena using Shadaj-Madham gram calculation, therefore the traditional Swarasthan (as Hz frequency) were different than the tempered scale that is been used today even in Indian classical music. For example the Gandhar frequency in Vedic music would be different than it is today (even in Indian classical).
Lastly, Indian music follows Murchana system which “relative”. therefore Dh-Ni-Sa is same as Ni-Sa-Re as far as swara distance matters. Also, we have variations of Nis and Dhas etc. so it changes when you use lower Ni.
🙏🙏🙏🙏
🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽
இன் தமிழ் நாங்கள் பூனுல் என்று அழைப்போம். இடக்கலை, பின்கலை, சுமுழுனை. இதன் அர்த்தம் வடது கண் சூரியன், இடது கண் சந்திரன் இந்த இரண்டு இனைந்து சுழிமுனையாக மாரும். இந்த சுழிமுனை மூலமாக கையிலயம் சென்று இரைவனை தரிசிக்கலாம் ஃஃஃ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
He is pronouncing udatta and anudatta as udata and unudata - is it correct or needs to be corrected? 22.23
💐🧡🙏🙏👍🎼🎵🎶💚💐
Can ladies learn this?
You need to find a teacher or Guru who teach women. Sri Satya Sai organisation has thousands of lady learners. Please try and establish contact. 🙏
Ladies don’t have the right to learning Vedas as per sastras. People who are not eligible to learn benefit from them by just hearing unlike eligible men
As if you need permission to learn vedas. It is an open source for humanity. It is written for humanity. Humanity is inclusive. Woman+ Man = Humanity
Thank you Sir for teaching Vedic grammar.. however, i wish you could have pronounced Ved not Veda.. similarly Swar for swara, and Varn for varna.. we dont need to pronounce our indian words in western tones which adds unnecessary extra "aa" in most of our ancient words..
There's an अकार towards the end and not the हल्। वर्ण is best written and pronounced as varṇa and not as वर्ण् varṇ or वर्णा varṇā
वर्ण= व्+ अ+ र् + ण् +अ
Correct
Namaskaram. Very important. Thanks for correction. Sanskrit is different from Hindi
@@ganeshankk6520 similar problem i find in pronouncing name of gods and goddesses.. i think there is sanskrit grammar, according to which a female name ends with a vowel sound such as Shubha, Shudha, Pooja, Janki, Shiva (name of mother Parvati), Krishna (name of Draupadi), Nidhi etc. And male names doesnt end with a vowel (with few exceptions) such as Mahesh, Ganesh, Ram, Shyam, Kamal, Arun etc..
@@naarad0911 you are right,.. with that Varn shouldnt be pronounced as Varna.. as Varna is not a-karant its aa-karant
please tell in tamil
Visit the channel vedavms. Tamil videos are already there !
Kindly Check the video and its in Tamil
ua-cam.com/video/BeAZufEwcZY/v-deo.html
In today's Modern Bharat this knowledge should be taught compulsory to every Hindu child without taking his / her caste into account .It's really unfortunate that only particular caste, who considered themselves Pure Hindus ( which was Hindus worst stupidity ) kept this knowledge with them, didn't allowed any other Hindu ,treated them like animals called them Shudras ( which was again another Hindus worst stupidity )
Even in today's world why you are you attributing Veda learning to only one section of the society? If anyone wants to learn one should have strict decipline, dedication. Now just blaming one section you are loosing the great value of learning itself. Instead think broad and start learning. Veds never restricted to any cast. Ex Dhruva, Nachiketa, shabdavedi Ekalavya ,Kanaka Dasaru, SareefSahebaru why we are not following them?
Instead of calling stupid, start thinking broad U NO in 2003 accepted that Sanskrit is the best vocal card and memory developing tool in the world. Instead of writing so negatively just start telling Ganananantwa , correctly, it requires lot of patience, if learnt correctly it will give you mental peace. Within few days of learning correctly your thoughts and actions can be controlled without any difficulty. Go through above series in depth your life will change and will me more creative in your work whatever you are doing.Leave away the negatives and start learning .Wish you all the best.❤🎉
Dear Ignoramus of a nominal Hindu: Read the Valmiki Ramayana and Mahabharata instead of watching serials and TV masala of Ramanand Sagar and Starplus. Raama and Krishna and Arjuna were NOT brahmins. They were all knowers of Brahmaastra which is not possible without study of veda. It is explicitly mentioned in Valmiki Ramayana that Shri Raama was a Yajurvedin. Until 20 years back there was even a kShatriya who was a nitya-agnihotri. This is NOT possible without study of the veda. A shudra was one who did not study the veda so in that sense everyone irrespective of jaati who has not studied the veda is a shudra. No one was ever kept away from vedic knowledge. This itself is a wrong assumption on your part. Learning the veda however involves adoption of nityakarma (trikAla sandhyavandana, dvikAla agnikArya, brahmayajnam), mitaahara (vegetarian sattvic diet) and appropriate lifestyle (brahmacharya, yama/niyama etc). The study of the veda involves repeating after the Guru and practising the veda mantras over 9-10 hours every day for 8 to 12 years. And you do all of this without expectation of financial or other rewards. Are you capable of this? Get your basics right atleast before pontificating.
Hindi bole 🙏🙏🙏
🙏🙏