It's great to see a full review of the Buick Lucerne from MotorWeek here on UA-cam. Even though I'm almost thirty I love not only the Buick Lucerne; but also the LeSabre (2000-2005,) Century (1997-2005,) Regal (1997-2005 and the generation from the early 2010s,) LaCrosse (2005-2013,) the late 90s Riviera, the Rainer, the Rendezvous and even the Cascada.
Not back then, and in a car, that HP is fine. Torque is more important as we have speed limits in this country and we wouldn’t be able to use all of that HP anyway.
The very last breath of Oldsmobile, the FWD G platform. Damn fine cars
It's great to see a full review of the Buick Lucerne from MotorWeek here on UA-cam. Even though I'm almost thirty I love not only the Buick Lucerne; but also the LeSabre (2000-2005,) Century (1997-2005,) Regal (1997-2005 and the generation from the early 2010s,) LaCrosse (2005-2013,) the late 90s Riviera, the Rainer, the Rendezvous and even the Cascada.
I have a 06 Lucerne cxl with 119k on it, only had it for over 3 months now, im enjoying it with no issues
I have a 2008 CXL with same mileage and it trully runs like a charm!
I HAVE 1
4 speed automatic transmission in 2006? That's like ancient.
I'm from the future and I'm here to tell you these cars will Have one of the worst automatic transmissions on the market and it will fail.
You a little too late for that
That GM 4 speed automatic was bullet proof, what are you talking about??? Maybe you should stay in the future and not comment.
Stick with the venerable 3.8
Wrongo!
Wrongo! Have two with over 110k miles with the original tranny. Both work fine.
275hp is worthless for a V8
Not back then, and in a car, that HP is fine. Torque is more important as we have speed limits in this country and we wouldn’t be able to use all of that HP anyway.
If your car doesn't have at least 100000hp from a 0.3L inline 2, its worthless and slow.
@@Andrew-bb3lc Alright i’m just saying 275hp from a V8 in 2006 is underwhelming. A nissan altima in 2006 made 270hp from a V6.