Andrew Tate BBC Interview: The Lucy Williamson Cut
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 чер 2023
- Full Uncut Interview: • Video
Original BBC Edited Interview: • Andrew Tate BBC interv...
Today, I'm going to show you the Lucy Williamson (Synder) cut of the infamous BBC Andrew Tate interview. I edited it to feature all the times Lucy Williamson spoke. On the edited BBC version that lasted 8 minutes 53 seconds, Williamson spent well over 5 minutes talking turning what was supposed to be an interview into a debate. It's the single worst piece of journalism I've ever seen the BBC do in my life. I give my commentary on what I think about Williamson and the lowbrow, low blow interview in this video.
Make a contribution to the channel by donating on PayPal at:
marc.antomattei@gmail.com
This video features commentary and criticism, constituting fair use. Fair use is a legal doctrine that promotes freedom of expression by permitting the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works in certain circumstances. Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides the statutory framework for determining whether something is a fair use and identifies certain types of uses-such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research-as examples of activities that may qualify as fair use.
www.copyright.gov/fair-use/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S O C I A L N E T W O R K S
I N S T A G R A M: / gentlemanmasterclass
F A C E B O O K P A G E: / gentlemanmasterclass
F A C E B O O K G R O U P: / thegentlemansclubtgc
T W I T T E R: / gentlemanmasterclass
T U M B L R: / thegentlemansclubtgc
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#AndrewTate #BBCNews #GentlemanMasterclass - Навчання та стиль
We all owe Lucy Williamson an apology (that includes me). I'm sorry. I made a 26-minute video juxtaposing Andrew Tate contradicting himself and lying to mainstream media interviewers while telling UA-camrs the truth about his lies and crimes. People in the comment section of that video want to hate on me now for exposing the truth. You can watch it here: ua-cam.com/video/vrF5qiblCMo/v-deo.html
Men, Tate may have given you some good advice sometimes. But it doesn't negate the crimes he's committed. Both can be true. And about the Lucy Williamson interview. All of her accusations have proven correct, and he's been proven in his own words to lied about everything!
Yeah that other video is a bit of an eye opener, to say the least.
Nice try, but your manipulation was debunked with Tate's interview with Owen Candace. Nothing new.
No we don't, Tates points are completely correct about her lack of journalistic integrity and approach. She came in with an agenda, not actual relevant questions. You won't and can't bring down the top g because he's raised and continues to raise thousands of average men into an army of real warriors not keyboard ones, you won't get far going against Andrew because your actually going against possibly millions of men now who are actively improving their lives and fighting for what's right to them, not the current state of affairs the world has become.
You're kidding or mentally unstable. Do tell us.
I salute you Sir
Thanks to BBC, now i am fan of Andrew Tate
Well, you have got "mad" in your name.
Me too 😂
Same here man
Hahajh, me too. I had no interest in this guy until now. Fully on the support tata
#metoo
I watched the full version and now watching this edited version. Unbelievable how much they edited the video 🤯. Absolutely ridiculous.
BBC is a joke 🤦♀️🙆♀️
He's a genius. He did that interview knowing full well what they'd do to him. His unedited version shows the media manipulation and propaganda. Well played Andrew.
That wasnt an interview, it was an attack on Tates character with manipulation and lies
Im pretty sure the 30 minute unedited interview was from a camera that andrew hid somewhere he knew they were going to do a hit piece.
OMG .... The BBC is unbelievable...this is not an interview, thank god there is the full version of this (interrogation)
I'm not a fan, I just can't believe the audacity of BBC and "main stream" media...Thankyou Sir.
I think a lot of people are reaching this point
@@claudeyaz Agreed
Wow! Im flabbergasted at what I’ve just seen. I’m no fan of Andrew Tate but having seen the full unedited version, this edit is criminal. Journalists have a responsibility to present the facts, and the BBC holds a greater responsibility than most. The whole team, including the editor, deserve to be sacked for misrepresentation.
Why would they when it’s the media that helps spread the agenda….I can’t believe we as the masses still have faith in controlled media
They didn't misrepresent anything.
@@michaeldonnan6767 😂😂 yea ok there buddy
@@criticaldarling1982 I noticed you didn't back up your sarcasm with an example.
@@michaeldonnan6767behold we've finally come across a Lucy fan
One of the biggest red flags for me(in the interview) was that after the interview was over, she didn’t have the courtesy to at least say, “thank you” or “thank you for sharing your viewpoints on these allegations.” Nope. She sat there in defeated silence, looking tired and exhausted. It’s clear that she came here with a clear agenda, and that after the interview was over she knew she had no dirt on him. Also notice how in the interview, she presented no evidence. Just repeating the police and National government making him as a dangerous man. Don’t always trust what you hear on the media.
Yes.
She looked as if she had been the one locked up in a dungeon for months.
Exactly!!! I noticed it also. She was indeed defeated and with her tail between her legs. She could not have the courtesy of thanking her host - Andrew Tate - who welcomed them. So shameful of her.
Her method of interviewing was 100% intentional. She did it that way so she could get sound bits and for the editing crew to fit the narrative. This ain't their first rodeo. Its all character assassination
Surely in this day and age they (BBC) would have known that their antics in failed editing wouldn't work. How naive of them to think they can get away with such an amateur editing job such as this.
Wow, this edit is outrageous. Thank goodness the full unedited version is available for us all to see. I am not necessarily an Andrew Tate fan, but Lucy came in with an agenda and ridiculously loaded questions. He answered and diffused every single question. She flatly refused to acknowledge or listen to any point that he made which seems to be a bit of a pattern for the BBC. This edit does not reflect how the interview went at all! Andrew Tate was articulate, fair and did not rise to her inflammatory pokes at him. I used to be a fan of the BBC, not any more.
I am necessarily an Andrew fan 💕and proud to say so, thank you.
Lady Lucy was awful. Shame on her.
Wow, she really hates Andrew, her hatred is so obvious...for a journalist, she is far from being objective. I used to liked her, shame on her. 👎
, totally! And maybe she could comb her hair! I think that when Andrew tells her that he would protect her if an intruder broke in, that was the first time she had been told that. I wonder how it made her feel. I think she was having huge cognitive dissonance and couldn't wait to get away from him.
@@diananeuman6222 I bet she has hair on both sides of her butt crack
To paraphrase Frankie Boyle - I could watch Lucy Williamson being gang r@ped and not feel any emotion…
We all know that the media is bought and paid for, but Tates unedited version has confirmed all of our concerns about lies spread by media sources. Tate and his team are pure geniuses for recording the interview and releasing it to show the world what really happened.
The BBC messed with the wrong chess player. He was 2 steps ahead from beginning to end.
I definitely wouldn't view myself as a fan of Tate. However, this is such an absolute decimation of a media source which is failing to cling to relevancy. The BBC just damaged itself significantly.
As a British journalist with over 20 years’ experience in media, I agree with all 7 points made in this video.
Additionally, Lucy Williamson looked petrified in the full-length interview. Perhaps she was afraid of Tate. More likely she was anxious to deliver the type of interview the brief required.
Williamson approached the interview as if Tate were on trial and she was a court prosecutor. Poor journalism and even worse editing. V. disappointing from the BBC.
I found the end particularly disturbing. Even if you don’t like Tate, disagree with his views, or think he’s a liar, you should still say, ‘Thank you for speaking with me.’ That’s just common courtesy.
Great videos. Thanks for sharing.
It’s a bit rich the beeb accusing (which they were, they barely even tried to hide it) someone of misogyny and sexual impropriety against women, when for over 40 years they helped Jimmy Savile, a serial rapist and paedophile (along with some of his friends) to escape justice, even after he had committed offences on their f*****g premises!
I’m not sure about Tate, he does come across as aggressive. But that doesn’t automatically make him guilty of any crimes. And he’s right; they have no authority over him, not legally and definitely not morally. They were supposed to get his side of the story.
So much for the ‘impartial’ BBC. She went in as judge, jury and would be executioner. I got rid of my tv 10 years ago when I saw right through their hypocrisy when their nonce employees activities came to light. They haven’t changed since and they never will. And ITV are just as bad. We no longer have genuine broadcasting in this country, we just have gatekeepers instead.
What we’re you watching she wasn’t terrified of Andrew Tate. She was combative antagonistic and persistent. Not the actions of someone who’s afraid …. Give over
@@daredevilbros2363 he just said he’s a British journalist. Another words a hired cuck to filter and present the interview in a way to promote their narrative. Narrative over truth is a journalist’s moto.
Didn’t know who Tate was till about 17 hours ago. Every one telling me how could I not know him he does MMA? Well he must suck cuz I never seen any of his fights.
You should watch the whole interview not the manipulated and edited version here…so black and white in difference.
@@oleggorky906don't forget Phillip Schofield.
I am a white woman in her late 50's, and I'm going to say I absolutely adore Andrew Tate, not because he's a good-looking gentleman, I respect his outlook on life. We as women, do not need to try and turn into feminine counterparts. And I do not believe that he is guilty of any of the charges that he's being charged with. I watched an interview with Andrew Tate in which she spoke about the culture in which he is in and with the women he deals with in that culture also. Just because we don't understand that culture doesn't mean we have the right to judge it.
Well said, totally agree with you. Masculinity is where its at. 💖
This woman, is not professional and she is so biased. She is a hater not an interviewer.
She’s probably an activist, not a journalist. That’s what they employ now. State gatekeepers pushing their own agenda. They wail about misogyny but they don’t give a shit about misandry, that’s allowed.
She is a toxic Feminist..
She should be fired!! She did zero research!!
she is exactly what BBC wants. That is how they operate. Soulless lackeys.
Your damn right she should be fired
What I sad exactly
Right that’s the most embarrassing thing on the whole interview. She didn’t bother understanding anything
She made it look like she asked questions and he didn't have an answer he was just stumbling trying to find an answer he didn't have. When in reality he pretty much talked more than her the entire interview and had some pretty good answers to questions
I agree, he didn't need to conduct himself like an immature boy, even putting words in her mouth (don't matter who she is). Tate's physical behavior showed more of his ugly colors. We all know how much he's f*cked up period. He also can't handle any types of hits and that's his weakness, the guy has so much fear that it projects primarily his anger asides peculiar insecurity. However much this interview sucked (or not), this definitely gave him a taste of his own medicine. He's scared AF, people can tell he was repeating himself as an excuse for time. I'm sure or (I hope), he knows all wrongdoings to innocent humans is catching up to him. Beware of scratching the devils balls way too long before sh*t hits the fan, sparking lights in the shadows & darkness. There's a difference in acting smart, & being clever.
Damn Tate, idk if you're psychopathic or straight up foolish.
@@Anna.Destiny1137 hahaha....reeeeeeeeeeee.................
@@Anna.Destiny1137when you get asked the same question time after time what are you meant to do other than repeat yourself if its the truth 😂 same questions equal same answers it's not him buying for time it's her trying to bait him and failing.
@@Anna.Destiny1137 go let your emotions out crazy girl.
@@Anna.Destiny1137 It's obvious you didn't see the uncut interview.
She couldn't substantiate any of her accusations and as he said she heard it on the internet didn't research it and she didn't refute it
She did no research. But somehow she knows what he thinks. Amazing 😂
She did a lot of research.
She just watched UA-cam shorts to see things out of context
She's an activist she dosent care about facts.
This edit is absolutely outrageous!! It's unbelievable how they would manipulate this 50-minute interview to just BARELY make it look like Andrew Tate is the bad guy. He handled it extremely professionally and the BBC has failed miserably.
The edit - as pointed out at the start of the video - was made by this guy, not the BBC.
That was a smart move from Tate. They made her look like she was dominating and him barely saying anything, while uncut version was exactly opposite. Everyone should do that.
Wow, the editing is crazy in this. That is one heck of a lot of jump cuts.
You know, I watched the whole thing and they cut so much from the original. The fact that legacy media thinks they can get away with this in this day and age. Laughable
They do get away with it. With those that crave such negative vibrations with enthusiasm.
Not everybody has an hour for Andrew Tate. They're not trying to "get away" with anything. They aren't pretending that's the whole interview. It's a version of the interview cut down to a size people besides his fanboys will watch. And they make the whole interview available.
@@michaeldonnan6767 the ONLY reason the full interview is available is because he had his staff tape it so he wasn’t misrepresented. Had they not taped it, this is all we would’ve seen. You’re on every comment & don’t know anything
I just dont understand the targeting about how bad Tates message is for young men but every second young girl can create a OnlyFans and that is not damaging?
No onlyfans is empowering haven't you heard 😂
I loved when Andrew said, "It's easy!"😅 Sick 'em Andrew! Hang in there Baby.❤
BBC should be sued for defamation. Let's make it happen, let's make an example of the BBC.
Here's what I commented on the BBCs YT channel
"The BBC is a dying, dwindling-down journalistic outlet. The fact that the honorable guest comes on to comment on the views of Tate, deeming them as "Sexist", may also be, as an educator, not so oblivious to the sexualization that happens within the school system by, but also not limited to, eradicating gender roles.
Double standards at its finest!"
Lucy is a legacy media goon. And proved it with every line of questioning. Q.E.D.
This cut puts her into a better light, my goodness. I was wondering why Tate repeated over and over again in the original. Now I realize, if he didn't, they would have had an easy job cutting his points out and making him look even worse. Nevertheless they couldn't cut everything and the cuts are so obvious, that everyone can tell something's wrong.
If that is what good journalism in the UK looks like, I feel, they are preparing their own doom with godspeed ahead.
A hurrah for the freedom of the internet, making it possible to see both versions!
Love Andrew Tate! he speaks up against the misandry in the UK... this Lucy cut shows her dominating the conversation, when in reality, Andrew tore her a new arsehole.
Yeah, I’ve seen the full version as well. They also did the same when Elon Musk chewed up their man a few weeks ago. That’s the beeb for you, they’re despicable w@nkers.
Edit: They usually allow comments on their videos (at least when it suits them and they are liable to get the kind of response that they want, that is), but they have disabled them for the Tate interview. It would be embarrassing if someone who watched it all pointed out to their viewers that they’re lying! 😂😂😂
Good thing he had his staff tape this so he wasn’t misrepresented. Good forethought, now we can all see the full version. All legacy media pulls this BS. Imagine if this is all we got
I love Andrew!!! Glad I watched the uncut!!! Top G!!! Those hateful women made all women look bad.
All women?
This was an intentional hatchet job.
To give the illusion of incompetence, on the side of Andrew Tate.
Andrew tate we love you ❤
I’m less concerned about the things this man says and I’m no fan btw than I am about the state of bbc journalism.
They also moved his responses around to use certain responses to her specific questions to make him look worse, when in reality those aren't the actual answers he gives to those questions. How is that allowed? Is that not slanderous or manipulative? I would sue if i could lol
Look at the difference in the 2, Andrew was lively, sharp and full of life. Lucy has a scowled face, looked nutrient deprived and near death look. Represented Good vs Evil to me!
This clip is cut to shreds😂
pierce morgen did the same to him
Pierce did do the same. He was a dick. But by the time that first interview had ended, I think Pierce had become so infactuated by him that he secretly became a fanboy. He ended up inviting him back for a second interview.
Wow the editing is absolutely insane here. LOL Came here after watching it in full. This is insane.
She looks like she has the upper hand here but thats not real life thats media
Fun fact : She's not even a journalist but a member of AT's PR team. Job well done, now he's grown in popularity 😂
These women and there feeling 😂
Please stop acting on your feelings and act on truth
wow just came from the full version of the video :o
Schools and Police concerned about Andrew Tate? So funny.
Right 😂😂 oh no! He’s using his free speech again & we don’t like it!
" i happen to like the BBC"
ME: AYOOO
Nah im glad i saw the unedited version he actually handled himself well.
She's completely turned on by this exchange.
Was looking for one as it was cut by the BBC, thank you!
She made him more famous ...
The only thing Tate is guilty of, is enlightening men about modern vvomen's flaws... and boy do they have them!
Andrew Tate is in the right way , he exposes many things that some people has hidden them , they just got afraid of him .
There are many things that those people can’t face themselves with,but he did it for them bravely .
They can’t stop those who are spreading bad things , cuz their plan is going perfectly.
MAY GOD PROTECT ANDREW TATE .
This wasn’t the Lucy Williamson edit, so what’s the point lol?!
Also why do we have to see you taking up a quarter of the screen during it? 👎🏻 video.
Wasn’t this Interview a lot longer ???
Let’s see how long it will take for UA-cam to delete this video. Terrible what BBC have done.
TOP G destroyed this thing from BBC WC
First of all, I agree with everything you have said in the video with one exception. Whenever you mention and compare the BBC cut with Snyder's cut it is an inaccurate representation of what the Snyder's cut is as opposed to Joss Whedon's cut. The Snyder Cut might be overly long but it’s the version that offers the most depth while the Whedon's cut is not the one that people prefer due to it barely scratching the surface of what the story is all about.
However Joss Whedon's cut is regarded as the ORIGINAL film between the two despite everyone knowing the fact that Snyder's cut is the first version ever created which was simply not finished in the editing process due to Snyder's daughter committing suicide and him having to step away from the project for his family. While viewing the movie, anyone can obviously notice how the first half of the Snyder's cut is having a lot of inconsistencies, which is the half that was done before the terrible situation occurred. The second half being the one where Snyder, coming back from such an event in his life, has put his all into the making of the movie and there are barely any inconsistencies at all.
Long story short:
Your assessment that the BBC interview can be described by saying " Snyder's Cut " is ridiculous and you should be ashamed for having placed the BBC in such a good light by doing it because the Snyder's Cut was the longer version of the 2 movies and the BBC interview was the shorter version of the interview. Thank you!
I'm just so curious as to why they edit these things like this
You make very good points my man. I love how you listed your points clearly
Just watched the same full interview that was recorded by Tate and this edited version of BBC. Andrew Tate demolished her in the full version. Surprised to see how editing changes the entire reality.
Gentlemen today u have a fan and an subscriber. Good jab man ❤❤❤❤
They have the video so edited that he’s glitching like Max Headroom from the Coke commercials of the 80s.
This edit is outrageous. Thank goodness the full unedited version is available for us all to see, the editor deserve to be sacked for misrepresentation
Like Starlord said: "it's not an ambush, it's a standoff"
Tate came in ready 😂😂😂😂😂
I came from your "38 minute version"; this edit (BBC Edit) is so fragmented / distorted that the interview has been reduced to be an actual lie: not half truths and hearsay but an actual lie.
Love the content man
I did watch the full interview earlier. I thought the BBC would have sent a journalist but instead they sent Lucy Williamson..!!! LOL..!!
Immediately fired. Same for the guys behind the questions
Most honest clout chaser in history, I respect that
“She didn’t allow him to answer” - I think you need to rewatch the unedited version because she definitely allowed him to answer. He was avoiding her questions and attempting to constantly redirect the conversation. He wanted to ask her questions. He did most of the talking. He made comments and accusations, but rarely answered her questions directly if at all.
You said it there, the unedited version. This means BBC has an agenda against Andrew Tate. Actually, he was really smart to record the whole interview and allow everyone to watch the entire interview. She tried to set him up. When you watch the whole interview, they explain that they agreed to ask that kind of question.
She keeps saying she is asking questions, but she keep accusing and quoting like a lawyer in court. What is her right to talk over anyone publicly?
I am going to pray for Lucy, her heart is weary and she looks ill. Every one that knows Jesus, needs to pray for Lucy when they see this. I honestly believe she is seriously ill.
Its a front. She purposefully came to interview looking battered to garner false sympathy
@@lemonlateralus The next time you see her she looks just as bad.
After listening this on BBC. I will not believe in the news media anymore.
And she accused Andrew Tate of emotional manipulation. The interviewer tried to manipulate him nonstop from start to finish but he turned things round to make her look like an emotional wreck and she left looking extremely unprofessional.
Wow the level of unprofessionalism is really astounding, she literally couldn't get herself to thank him for his time at the end which all journalist do whether you like the subject or not, she didn't even utter a word to him, thats child like behaviour. the BBC really drop the ball on this one by sending this women.
Wow. BBC peddling a very manipulated interview. Tate is really something. Love his intelligence and recall and integrity with her. Lucy was in over her head. Just came in with quote after quote after quote. Would have been good if she'd seen his content and knew where he is coming from. She had no sense of really trying to get to what makes Tate tick and influential. And then she just ends it like a spoiled little brat. Reminiscent of Elon Musk owning another BBC journalist and Trump rolling over the CNN personality/"journalist" in that ridiculous town hall debacle.
It‘s interesting. I don‘t think it‘s a councidence that BBC chose to make the „interview“ look like an „interrogation“. Even the interviewer was made to look rather like an interrogator at a policestation than somebody who‘s doing a professionell interview for TV/Internet.
This should be illegal to cut up videos to try to change the narrative of the actual situation. Its crazy how much they changed this.
do you work for bbc?
I see a lawsuit there
Where is Sophie?
Remember how Helen Lewis made a career suicide when she interviewed Jordan Peterson? Welp.... I'm sorry for Lucy Williamson.
Its Unbelievable how BBC Rolls?,
WOW! Absolutely SHOCKING.
I watch the full interview,shame on you BBC!!!!!
Anyone notice how not a SINGLE TIME she flipped a page in her book. Circled her questions. Said there are many quotes of people harmed yet does not provide a SINGLE EXAMPLE. The rest is beyond obvious that it doesn't need to be discussed. I would also say she had a frightened look in her eyes, her body language such as hand placement and throat twitches and swallowing. Which is indicative to someone anticipating and gripping trying to pull off something impossible. Such as knowingly lying and making desperate attempts at berating Andrew only to no avail. Whereas Tate you can see his very dominant body language such as heavy chest breaths which are typically shown from someone handling a rather large charge of questions yet maintaining solid eye contact with a calm and quickly responsive demeanor. As mentioned during this interview these are not the questions to be discussed yet a hit piece anyway underway and he responsively and accurately handled each question expertly. He immediately could recognize the trap and would laugh some of them off because he noticed how obvious some were that someone without any real understanding of body language or communicative skills could point out how horrendous this is turning out for this uneducated journalist. Such at attempts of asking Tate for an apology which implies that he was wrong in the first place he COMPLETELY IGNORES it. Again for someone on this level it is not a shock he would record this on his own, that is also obvious. The thing is if you think that he tore her to shreds during this interview this isn't even 30% of what he would be capable. He could call out every single detail and mistake and trap and make it obvious but if he did that he would be seen as hostile and that would fuel the flames which would be good for editing for them. This is what happens when a rookie tries to play know it all against an expert. Not shocked at all, rather expected. Tate as always dominates every realm of human endeavor and he ALLOWS ALL OF US to witness his greatness as THE KING COBRA.
They just made him more famous!😂
Reminds me of the Kathy Newman “interview” that helped launch Jordan Peterson.😂
Did she go on totally disheveled-looking just so later they could make a statement about misogynists pointing it out? She looks so unprofessional. As a black man I could never sit on the news representing a large media group looking like I just rolled out of bed. This is ridiculous, glad I watched the full interview first. Master gaslighter and manipulator, Lucy Williamson
I noticed a big difference in energy if i compare the unedited video of Andrew Tate and the edit video of BBC News. It's interesting how BBC is using so many edit tactics to make the scenario look very different. It felt more of an offensive side on the BBC edit after watching their video. And felt more of a mutual energy on the unedited version of Andrew Tate.
2:51 she mutes where he says no he hasn't but keeps her side going to make it sound like he didn't say it, lmao
they also removed the part where he says "this is something I've been accused of saying that I definitely haven't say" along those lines, she removed that part
where he says "because I have invited you into my house, we are equal people on equal standings" she removed that part to make it seem like he just said "You're not the boss of me, I've allowed you into my house" to give the impression that he's being domineering
she removed the part where he said he hasn't taken down any websites, to make it appear that he took his site down.
This interview sounded more like an interrogation.
Well done Lucy! 👏 . I cld see Andrew did not like her "disobeying" him! 😅
Their pitiful, good is prevailing over evil, keep up the good work Andrew
Absolutely disgusting how they've cut this!
I love how they edited out all the great points and counters Tate responded with and left the parts so it seems he is just saying “no, that’s wrong, this is garbage” this reminds me of the movie Mr.Deeds where Adam Sandler goes from a pizza shop owner to super millionaire, then the paparazzi are out to make him look like a terrible person😂 this is almost like that scene where he saves a cat and the media makes it look like he tossed a cat out the window for shits and giggles
This was not an interview. It was a hit piece.
Tulsi LOL
gladly I'm seeing the uncut first, if I see this one first may I'll think the same way they want us to think
Not an interview, she came for an argument.
Wow! This is a lesson in editing!
Has he been printed by interpol or a municipal law enforcement entity? We'll very likely not have any way to know.
thank you for clarifying what happened and explaining,in a very professionally way appreciated that the Brother need to explain we want Him to speak how they treat it Him true those days of wen he had no charge o evidence. JC brothers