Skip the waitlist and invest in blue-chip art for the very first time by signing up for Masterworks: www.masterworks.art/myoldcar Purchase shares in great masterpieces from artists like Pablo Picasso, Banksy, Andy Warhol, and more. 🎨 See important Masterworks disclosures: www.masterworks.com/cd
We, in the family, owned several VW Santanas; basically a rebadged AUDI 4000, or probably the most successful Chinese taxi ever, some are still hauling westerners and noodles in that part of the world. A great car to own in the era of highly restricted low mpg, v8, emissions control madness. But lack of parts, especially the differential, made them impossible to keep.
Chrysler has been all about taking risks but getting almost none of them right. Their failures are epic and well documented. If I robbed a bank I’d want the cops driving a POS Charger in a high speed chase as it would very like blow up before whatever I was driving. They’re well documented as having the least reliable and worst vehicles of the big 3. It’s the brand for those with a small p*nis everywhere hoping to compensate with the loud exhaust and big wheels making them somehow a bigger man.
*ALL major automakers must do limited-run or low-volume productions to showcase their engineering and design capabilities.* In this gray world of family trucksters, the "Prowlers" will be the only thing keeping car builders and car lovers from jumping out of windows out of despair.
That whole era was so exciting. The prowler, the viper, the ford 500, the SSR, the thunderbird. It just seemed like tomorrow could bring anything. Very disappointed where we ended up.
@@aberamagold7509I've owned 2 of the Mn12 Thunderbirds. A 1989 with the 3.8 V6 (horrible motor) and a 1997 with the 4.6 V8. The 97 was much better between the redesigned interior and the better motor. I still liked the 89 though.
Maybe it's me being a 90s kid, but I think the prowler is still a cool car. Especially now, 20 years after it's left production. The prowler managed to make a distinctive mark that follow on retro cars like the thunderbird and ssr just couldn't compete with.
The 11th gen T-bird sold over five times the amount of Prowlers produced in only a four year production run. The retro cars of this craze definitely moved but they all suffered from similar drawbacks.
A friend of mine has 1999 prowler. Bought it in 2004 and daily drive it to work expect ice & snow. Wash & wax it and change the oil once a quarter. It has over 200k, normal wear out parts but engine & Transmission are rock steady. The "Haters out there are pissed off because his "Hooptie is still runnin to this day.
Years ago there was a custom shop in Grand Junction Colorado called Prowler Pro. They developed an engine upgrade for the 3.5l that took the displacement up to a true 5.0l that they called the Super Stroker. The upgraded engine was capable of producing 400hp and 400tq running the stock ECM. The company Prowler Pro closed it's doors years ago and all the tooling and info on building the Super Stroker was purchased by Bad Kitty Performance(I think from Utah). A quick Google search for either company comes up with nonsense and a deeper search would be necessary to find anything. There are however some UA-cam videos of Super Stroker cars.
Thank you for making this video. Awesome as always. Thank you for pointing out that some channels are getting confused between the 2.7 and 3.5 on the problems. The 3.5 is a bulletproof engine so long as you change the water pump and timing belt. The 2.7 is the one with the problems.
As I own an Intrepid, Im very familiar with the defects of the engines available, especially the 2.7 since I own one with it. The main issue with that engine was the water pump. It would prematurely fail leaking coolant into the oil crank case, sludging the oil up and causing oil starvation. However, Chrysler has made a revised water pump that can be bolted onto any affected 2.7 V6. Also there were issues on the early Intrepids with the timing chain guides which were fixed for later model years starting in 2003 I believe. If you have an engine with the revised timing chain guides and the revised water pump design, then it’ll be a pretty reliable engine. I personally haven’t really had to do anything more than maintenance level repairs on mine because it’s at that age where things are wearing out.
8k miles in 3 weeks in such a car? Much respect. I did that many miles in 26 days on a motorcycle (2002 Kawasaki ZR-7s) once and it was quite the experience.
The Prowler is absolutely a very cool and unusual car, but it definitely should’ve had a V8, preferably with an optional manual. That being said, I’m always glad to see cars like this make it to production in the first place.
I totally agree. Chrysler could have made an aluminum 4.7L V-8 for it, but it had to suffer with the little V-6. I was too poor to own one but the retro-style turned heads.
The 3.5 made 20 more horsepower than the 4.7 and was tunable to 300 horsepower with intake and computer mods on 91 octane. Hennessy made headers that they claimed made 27hp on the stock engine. Chrysler didn’t get credit for the engine they did put in it.
I can answer this. According to the executives I asked, in person, they couldn't resolve an overheating problem in the as-is prowler design inserting a V8, so they compromised with the V6.
There was a real cool concept that was called the Howler, with a 4.7 litre V8 and a 5 speed manual, and a reshape trunk that could actually fits two sets of golf clubs. I think it looks better than the original too...too bad it never made it to production
We, in the family, owned several VW Santanas; basically a rebadged AUDI 4000, or probably the most successful Chinese taxi ever, some are still hauling westerners and noodles in that part of the world. Amazing car! But lack of parts, especially the differential, made them impossible to keep.
It's neat and I like it but yes, it's so niche I'm surprised it lasted as long as it did too. And you are so right about finding a good, cared for older car instead of forking out silly money for a new car. I have a 2011 Mazda 6 wagon, which is great despite being 156k miles up. And a 2002 Ford Puma with only 20k miles. Two cars together cost me £4500.
@2 Corinthians 4:7-11 Nice! Good looking car. You are enjoying it? Yes, the Puma was Europe only. Probably too small for the US market. You might want to have a look for the Steve McQueen Puma ad on UA-cam.
"I'm surprised it lasted as long as it did too." 5 years seems like a pretty long run for such a niche car! With cars like this, people who want one, buy one, and then there's nobody left to sell them too.
Its cool you have one of these. I drove a few of them years ago. It felt like a well made kit car behind the wheel to me. Saw a beautiful red one a few weeks ago in the wild at a intersection.
Even though it is not my iind of car, i'm very happy it was made. And wish more of these crazy and controversial cars would be made. The car market has been boring for far to long. The switch to ev could hopefully change that again. With cars becomming more modular it will be easier to do things like low number coach building again. Who knows what the future brings
@@dalesumney8806 yea. Honestly I’ve forgiven it for being a parts bin special since I’m sure it took a lot of money to design that crazy shape so they had to appease the accountants some how. Plus stuff like the radio, window switches, turn signal stalk, etc we’re in countless other Chrysler cars.
@@dalesumney8806I think it's good that it's a parts bin car. Wider availability of parts should they need replacement instead of model specific parts for what was a lower production run vehicle.
Mother Mopar has always done things differently,sometimes for the better,sometimes for the worse,but I agree that the Prowler was something special in a good way!❤❤❤
To me the front looked like what would become the PT cruiser. I did see photos of the Prowler when I was younger, but I don't I've ever seen one in person sadly. I like how you de-bunked a lot of crap people talk just because of what they've heard about, such as bad engines.
@@autochatter Indeed they do. That's because the water pump is driven by the timing chain, so it's internal. When it leaks (as all water pumps inevitably do), it will do so in the engine oil... Incidentally, the Ford front wheel drive 3.5 and 3.7 engines (like on the Edge, for example) share the same stupid design. Timing chain driven water pumps are ticking time bombs...
Actual owners are OGs. They know how to take care of the so-called "problematic" cars. As a fellow Subaru owner, I've had to read so many wrong head gasket infos out there.
We were so excited about this car when it was in concept form. Then the production model came out and it was weak. The normal windshield, the big plastic front bumpers. The lack of rear fender haunches. The lame and weak engine was the worst part though. So much potential
I still want one. Have a rough list of things I would love to do. The first one I saw got me it was a custom from a rims add. Kinda like the 3 on the right at 1:21
I appreciate any car that takes a risk to get into production. It's obvious that the Prowler wouldn't have mass market appeal, yet Chrysler did it anyway. I like that....
I drove one of these for about 50 miles back in 00 to deliver it to a customer. Only things i disliked about it were the slushy slow feeling transmission, and the bumpy harsh ride. It really could have benefited from a manual transmission, it would have made it the perfect car to hop in and enjoy a nice sunny day of cruising around and enjoying the car, and the day.
I remember when those came out and I loved them. Now over 20 years later... If I came across one I could afford, I'd absolutely buy it! Then put a couple turbos on it!
I saw one at a car meet once that was two-tone purple over yellow - was this a factory special edition or option, or a modification done by the owner? I never saw the owner to ask
There was a lot of liability in these cars too - I knew a guy who had the top come off his at (90+mph) speed. Lost control, and chryler setlled. I remember him having both a new one, AND a viper after that....
Any car that looks like this needs to have performance to match otherwise it will be a serious disappointment to potential buyers. It’s the exact problem that the Delorean had. They needed to figure out some way to cram a 400 hp V8 in it and that should have been painfully obvious to everyone involved.
People seem to have forgotten that the engine bay of the Prowler didn't support any V8 engine that Chrysler had at the time. The fact that the Prowler was made of mostly aluminum also contributed to the problem since any engine with a lot of torque could have torn the car up significantly.
You are correct about the manual transmission. However it did, during its run, receive an engine upgrade with more power. It didn't exactly make it a tire shredder but it was an improvement.
I'm surprised you felt the need to spout off before doing 5 seconds' worth of research. "For the 1999 model year, the engine was replaced with a more powerful, aluminum-block, 253 hp (189 kW; 257 PS) at 6400 rpm version of the engine." Dumdumdumdumdum
@@tim3172 oh, wow, so it survived 4 years without an increase in horsepower or manual transmission! The Prowler would have been awesome with a supercharger & 5 speed manual.
I think they should’ve given a V8, a six-speed manual, and made it more of a real sports roadster than some pseudo-muscle hot-road. This was Plymouth’s opportunity to make a Corvette.
The Prowler would have needed a longer hood to have a V8 engine put in. A manual transmission would have limited the market they were trying to reach. You already had the Viper for those who wanted a manual transmission.
Outstanding video. Thanks for dispelling many myths about the Prowler. Owning one for 24 years has literally changed our lives. We now have friends whom are really more like family all over the world.
I had the first Oldsmobile Silhouette in Connecticut in 1980. Nearly caused a half dozen collisions with people rubber-necking to see it. Including One prime-mover and van on rte 69.
I saw a Prowler in a Meijer parking lot a few years ago. It could have been a UFO in terms of weird coolness. It was expensive and fast and you would never mistake it for anything else. It's kinetic sculpture.
I worked at Alcoa Technical Center at the time. Was told by one welder that they had hand built 3 frames as demos. Chrysler looked at them, liked them and asked when they could get a thousand more...
Liked and subscribed. The Prowler was a very intriguing vehicle. I was sad that when Plymouth dropped in the all aluminum 3.5 engine, they didn't put in a 5 or 6 spd manual transaxle. That would have given it some credibility. As it is, it's still a beautiful little (faux) hotrod. Cheers!
Im a mopar fan for a few reasons. The 2 main reasons is chrysler always tried to make things totally different . And the 2nd reason is everyone has fords and chevys. I have 3 Plymouths at the moment. a 68,69 and 73. Ive also ran mopars in a lot of demolition derbies over the last 40 plus years.
I would love to see a video on the G60 and VR6 Corrado! 1990 G60, That's the one that got away for me. I've owned two antique Pontiacs a 55 Chieftain and a 67 LeMans and the VW Corrado is still THE one that got away.
Came out under the Plymouth name, that name stopped being used. Chrysler picked it up and it still did t sell well cause since it's first day dealers jacked up the prices over double msrp at times.
I've never been a Plymouth fan largely because the last Plymouth worth owning went across the assembly lines in the early 70s. But, I love the Prowler. It's wierd and quirky for sure, and honestly it's most endearing quality is the way is begs you to imagine just how badass it COULD have been if it had been designed during the Hellcat years.
Those were funky for a "retro" design. However the high bumper required by crash regulations always looked funky or out of place to the rest of the lines of the thing, I could see why people did the delete mod even if it makes the car less roadworthy from a safety standpoint. (Actual classic roadsters either stripped the bumper or kept it down low.)
The Plymouth Prowler is a beautiful unique car especially if they're purple or orange. Ever since I seen one as a preteen I wanted one. Still would love to have one just like I'd love to have a Dodge Copperhead if they actually released them for buyers instead of just using it as a concept car. I never knew that they were only available with automatic transmissions, what a shame because manual transmissions are more fun and faster.
A turbo charger and a manual transmission would be sweet on one of these, or a V-8 and a manual transmission. Hell, even an in-line four with a turbo and a manual transmission.
The 3.5 wasn't gutless but man I spent way too much time wrenching on the one in our '99 Concorde LXi. That whole car had the build quality of an '80s GM.
Skip the waitlist and invest in blue-chip art for the very first time by signing up for Masterworks: www.masterworks.art/myoldcar
Purchase shares in great masterpieces from artists like Pablo Picasso, Banksy, Andy Warhol, and more. 🎨
See important Masterworks disclosures: www.masterworks.com/cd
We, in the family, owned several VW Santanas; basically a rebadged AUDI 4000, or probably the most successful Chinese taxi ever, some are still hauling westerners and noodles in that part of the world. A great car to own in the era of highly restricted low mpg, v8, emissions control madness. But lack of parts, especially the differential, made them impossible to keep.
Thunderbird SC, is a car you should most definitively look into.
This was a car that took a lot of risks. The retro styling, the engineering...I'm glad it got to production.
Chrysler has been all about taking risks but getting almost none of them right. Their failures are epic and well documented. If I robbed a bank I’d want the cops driving a POS Charger in a high speed chase as it would very like blow up before whatever I was driving. They’re well documented as having the least reliable and worst vehicles of the big 3. It’s the brand for those with a small p*nis everywhere hoping to compensate with the loud exhaust and big wheels making them somehow a bigger man.
beautiful car to be sure. the only thing i could fault with it is that the front bumpers could have been placed some 4-5 inches lower
The retro styling... The failed at that. And you have a mini van engine. They died with good reason.
Agreed although they cheaped out by rifling through the spare parts bin for some of its components and it showed.
*ALL major automakers must do limited-run or low-volume productions to showcase their engineering and design capabilities.* In this gray world of family trucksters, the "Prowlers" will be the only thing keeping car builders and car lovers from jumping out of windows out of despair.
Im still to this day, shocked and happy that the prowler got into production at all.
That whole era was so exciting. The prowler, the viper, the ford 500, the SSR, the thunderbird. It just seemed like tomorrow could bring anything. Very disappointed where we ended up.
I really liked the 90's Thunderbirds.
There's a used car lot I drive by that has a Thunderbird and an SSR park next to each other they look good next to each other
@@aberamagold7509I've owned 2 of the Mn12 Thunderbirds. A 1989 with the 3.8 V6 (horrible motor) and a 1997 with the 4.6 V8. The 97 was much better between the redesigned interior and the better motor. I still liked the 89 though.
@@aberamagold7509 i kinda likes em too i'd v buy one today if thre had put a 302 in them
I wanted every car you just mentioned lol they were all so dope !!!!!
Maybe it's me being a 90s kid, but I think the prowler is still a cool car. Especially now, 20 years after it's left production. The prowler managed to make a distinctive mark that follow on retro cars like the thunderbird and ssr just couldn't compete with.
Just imagine it with a 5.7 Hemi swap!
The 11th gen T-bird sold over five times the amount of Prowlers produced in only a four year production run. The retro cars of this craze definitely moved but they all suffered from similar drawbacks.
@@chazzcoolidge2654 Just think if a Maga Trumper big motor boy could get a girlfriend without financial bribery.
I agree. I'd like to see a modern version but if they did they'd probably make it electric unfortunately.
@@Greg-io1ipJust think.
A friend of mine has 1999 prowler. Bought it in 2004 and daily drive it to work expect ice & snow. Wash & wax it and change the oil once a quarter. It has over 200k, normal wear out parts but engine & Transmission are rock steady. The "Haters out there are pissed off because his "Hooptie is still runnin to this day.
Years ago there was a custom shop in Grand Junction Colorado called Prowler Pro. They developed an engine upgrade for the 3.5l that took the displacement up to a true 5.0l that they called the Super Stroker. The upgraded engine was capable of producing 400hp and 400tq running the stock ECM. The company Prowler Pro closed it's doors years ago and all the tooling and info on building the Super Stroker was purchased by Bad Kitty Performance(I think from Utah). A quick Google search for either company comes up with nonsense and a deeper search would be necessary to find anything. There are however some UA-cam videos of Super Stroker cars.
Thank you for making this video. Awesome as always. Thank you for pointing out that some channels are getting confused between the 2.7 and 3.5 on the problems. The 3.5 is a bulletproof engine so long as you change the water pump and timing belt. The 2.7 is the one with the problems.
Agreed
Chrysler was unstoppable in the 90s...The '92 Viper, '94 Ram, '97 Dakota, '98 Durango...then Daimler got involved and basically ruined everything.
The 94 Ram body style still holds up.
Yep, same thing happening with Dodge now.....
As I own an Intrepid, Im very familiar with the defects of the engines available, especially the 2.7 since I own one with it. The main issue with that engine was the water pump. It would prematurely fail leaking coolant into the oil crank case, sludging the oil up and causing oil starvation. However, Chrysler has made a revised water pump that can be bolted onto any affected 2.7 V6. Also there were issues on the early Intrepids with the timing chain guides which were fixed for later model years starting in 2003 I believe. If you have an engine with the revised timing chain guides and the revised water pump design, then it’ll be a pretty reliable engine. I personally haven’t really had to do anything more than maintenance level repairs on mine because it’s at that age where things are wearing out.
8k miles in 3 weeks in such a car? Much respect. I did that many miles in 26 days on a motorcycle (2002 Kawasaki ZR-7s) once and it was quite the experience.
Once I did 8k miles and it took a whole hour and it was really boring. Sorry, I meant 9 miles.
Very cool and unique car. I had no idea it was so pivotal in advancing aluminum manufacturing. Love the channel!
I got to stamp hoods for this and clean the tub assemblies as they came off the line.
The Prowler is absolutely a very cool and unusual car, but it definitely should’ve had a V8, preferably with an optional manual. That being said, I’m always glad to see cars like this make it to production in the first place.
I totally agree. Chrysler could have made an aluminum 4.7L V-8 for it, but it had to suffer with the little V-6. I was too poor to own one but the retro-style turned heads.
The 3.5 made 20 more horsepower than the 4.7 and was tunable to 300 horsepower with intake and computer mods on 91 octane. Hennessy made headers that they claimed made 27hp on the stock engine. Chrysler didn’t get credit for the engine they did put in it.
When did the 4.7 even come out? The 5.2 and 5.9 were Chrysler’s only V8 when the Prowler debuted.
Yes a hemi with Lake pipes coming out of the body turning into side pipes
I can answer this. According to the executives I asked, in person, they couldn't resolve an overheating problem in the as-is prowler design inserting a V8, so they compromised with the V6.
Just saw a Hellcat swapped Prowler recently. Mental!
There was a real cool concept that was called the Howler, with a 4.7 litre V8 and a 5 speed manual, and a reshape trunk that could actually fits two sets of golf clubs. I think it looks better than the original too...too bad it never made it to production
It was called the growler
Any chance of putting a picture of the "Howler/ Growler 👍
87 Chevy Turbo Sprint - the MOST FUN car I ever owned (Including 3 Vipers)
Hilarious that the Dodge Neon you showed at 15:30 had clapped out peeling paint as that seem to be a feature of all them I saw!
We, in the family, owned several VW Santanas; basically a rebadged AUDI 4000, or probably the most successful Chinese taxi ever, some are still hauling westerners and noodles in that part of the world. Amazing car! But lack of parts, especially the differential, made them impossible to keep.
one of the coolest cars of that era, for real, congrats, for the car and the channel!
It's neat and I like it but yes, it's so niche I'm surprised it lasted as long as it did too.
And you are so right about finding a good, cared for older car instead of forking out silly money for a new car.
I have a 2011 Mazda 6 wagon, which is great despite being 156k miles up. And a 2002 Ford Puma with only 20k miles. Two cars together cost me £4500.
@2 Corinthians 4:7-11 Nice! Good looking car. You are enjoying it?
Yes, the Puma was Europe only. Probably too small for the US market. You might want to have a look for the Steve McQueen Puma ad on UA-cam.
"I'm surprised it lasted as long as it did too." 5 years seems like a pretty long run for such a niche car! With cars like this, people who want one, buy one, and then there's nobody left to sell them too.
Its cool you have one of these. I drove a few of them years ago. It felt like a well made kit car behind the wheel to me. Saw a beautiful red one a few weeks ago in the wild at a intersection.
just subscribed. Looking for a video from ya on the Pontiac Solstice.
Even though it is not my iind of car, i'm very happy it was made. And wish more of these crazy and controversial cars would be made.
The car market has been boring for far to long.
The switch to ev could hopefully change that again. With cars becomming more modular it will be easier to do things like low number coach building again.
Who knows what the future brings
I’ve always loved the prowler. It’s such a parts bin car but with a rwd transaxle layout, it would’ve been so cool to have that setup in an LH car!
One of the things people complain about the Prower is that it is a parts bin car. Weren't hot rods actually parts bin cars?
@@dalesumney8806 yea. Honestly I’ve forgiven it for being a parts bin special since I’m sure it took a lot of money to design that crazy shape so they had to appease the accountants some how. Plus stuff like the radio, window switches, turn signal stalk, etc we’re in countless other Chrysler cars.
@@dalesumney8806I think it's good that it's a parts bin car. Wider availability of parts should they need replacement instead of model specific parts for what was a lower production run vehicle.
Even today, whether you love the Prowler or hate it, you will notice it. There’s nothing like on the road.
Great episode. Good on you man
Mother Mopar has always done things differently,sometimes for the better,sometimes for the worse,but I agree that the Prowler was something special in a good way!❤❤❤
To me the front looked like what would become the PT cruiser. I did see photos of the Prowler when I was younger, but I don't I've ever seen one in person sadly. I like how you de-bunked a lot of crap people talk just because of what they've heard about, such as bad engines.
Yeah I only heard the 2.7 v6s were sludgemakers. Never the 3.5. I think the water pump starts to leak internally leading to it on the 2.7's?
@@autochatter Indeed they do. That's because the water pump is driven by the timing chain, so it's internal. When it leaks (as all water pumps inevitably do), it will do so in the engine oil...
Incidentally, the Ford front wheel drive 3.5 and 3.7 engines (like on the Edge, for example) share the same stupid design. Timing chain driven water pumps are ticking time bombs...
Actual owners are OGs. They know how to take care of the so-called "problematic" cars. As a fellow Subaru owner, I've had to read so many wrong head gasket infos out there.
I love the Prowler and screw all the haters.
always a beautiful car, and such an out there risk.
We were so excited about this car when it was in concept form. Then the production model came out and it was weak. The normal windshield, the big plastic front bumpers. The lack of rear fender haunches. The lame and weak engine was the worst part though. So much potential
one of the coolest looking cars ever made in my opinion!
I've been looking forward to this episode, thank you!!!
I still want one. Have a rough list of things I would love to do. The first one I saw got me it was a custom from a rims add. Kinda like the 3 on the right at 1:21
Great video, very informative.
Hi Pat, I have really enjoyed all your prowler videos 👍👍👍 Thank you so much as I have learned a lot about my 1999 prowler👌👌👌
I appreciate any car that takes a risk to get into production. It's obvious that the Prowler wouldn't have mass market appeal, yet Chrysler did it anyway. I like that....
I drove one of these for about 50 miles back in 00 to deliver it to a customer. Only things i disliked about it were the slushy slow feeling transmission, and the bumpy harsh ride.
It really could have benefited from a manual transmission, it would have made it the perfect car to hop in and enjoy a nice sunny day of cruising around and enjoying the car, and the day.
I reccomend Adams interviews with Bob Lutz over at Rare Classic Cars and Automotive History
Always wanted one, but life came along, work, kids, mortgage. You know, Life. Still a nice looking car and glad they exist.
I remember when those came out and I loved them. Now over 20 years later... If I came across one I could afford, I'd absolutely buy it! Then put a couple turbos on it!
I think it's the coolest looking car made in a very long time. I'd love to own one !
I saw one at a car meet once that was two-tone purple over yellow - was this a factory special edition or option, or a modification done by the owner? I never saw the owner to ask
Owner mod. Custom paint jobs are a very popular Prowler mod.
I was lucky to drive one of these at an auto auction many years ago - such a cool car - it felt like driving a life size hot wheels
A shout out to the Car Wizard, seen working on a Prowler!!! 👍👍🙂
There was a lot of liability in these cars too - I knew a guy who had the top come off his at (90+mph) speed. Lost control, and chryler setlled. I remember him having both a new one, AND a viper after that....
One of the most unique cars I have ever seen on the road is the Prowler and a DMC12. Very cool cars!
Any car that looks like this needs to have performance to match otherwise it will be a serious disappointment to potential buyers. It’s the exact problem that the Delorean had. They needed to figure out some way to cram a 400 hp V8 in it and that should have been painfully obvious to everyone involved.
Here in the UK, these Prowlers are very rare and sell for the same kind of money as the lesser Ferraris.
Same with the Chevy SSR.
Such a nice video of a car I've grown to like more over the years.
Greetings from the Netherlands
I've always wanted to see a Prowler with a rumble seat.
Please do one on the Mitsubishi Diamante
I had never seen that commercial in the intro. The guy in the white T-Shirt reminds me of Trevor from GTA V.
It is him or rather the voice actor, Steven Ogg.
They have a low-miles 2001 Chrysler Prowler on Craig's List... for $60,000. It appears to have appreciated in value.
People seem to have forgotten that the engine bay of the Prowler didn't support any V8 engine that Chrysler had at the time. The fact that the Prowler was made of mostly aluminum also contributed to the problem since any engine with a lot of torque could have torn the car up significantly.
Great video!
This car with a any Ls1 a manual and minus the bumper peeices is awsome!!
I always liked the look of these. Wouldn’t mind tooling around in one.
this is actually a really neat episode!
I was a young man when they came out. The video made me think about this car for the first in years. Good video
I’m surprised the Prowler last 5 years without a manual transmission or increase in horsepower.
You are correct about the manual transmission. However it did, during its run, receive an engine upgrade with more power. It didn't exactly make it a tire shredder but it was an improvement.
I'm surprised you felt the need to spout off before doing 5 seconds' worth of research.
"For the 1999 model year, the engine was replaced with a more powerful, aluminum-block, 253 hp (189 kW; 257 PS) at 6400 rpm version of the engine."
Dumdumdumdumdum
@@tim3172 oh, wow, so it survived 4 years without an increase in horsepower or manual transmission! The Prowler would have been awesome with a supercharger & 5 speed manual.
I think they should’ve given a V8, a six-speed manual, and made it more of a real sports roadster than some pseudo-muscle hot-road. This was Plymouth’s opportunity to make a Corvette.
The Prowler would have needed a longer hood to have a V8 engine put in. A manual transmission would have limited the market they were trying to reach. You already had the Viper for those who wanted a manual transmission.
The narrow focal point of the headlights always made it seem like it was farther away than it really was at night.
Great content, as always. And I love the channel. Please keep it rolling. Thank you, sir.
Outstanding video. Thanks for dispelling many myths about the Prowler. Owning one for 24 years has literally changed our lives. We now have friends whom are really more like family all over the world.
I had the first Oldsmobile Silhouette in Connecticut in 1980. Nearly caused a half dozen collisions with people rubber-necking to see it. Including One prime-mover and van on rte 69.
...and...nobody knows what that was.
Still looks like a concept car even by todays standards
I hope to get one someday; and make some "customizations".
Thats what makes America Great! We all have the right to like or dislike almost anything. I haven't owned a Chrysler product since the early 70's.
I saw a Prowler in a Meijer parking lot a few years ago. It could have been a UFO in terms of weird coolness. It was expensive and fast and you would never mistake it for anything else. It's kinetic sculpture.
Fast?
Finally! Thanks, Pat. Great video- worth the wait!
I’m glad I finally got to see ur face! I enjoy ur videos so much!
I worked at Alcoa Technical Center at the time. Was told by one welder that they had hand built 3 frames as demos. Chrysler looked at them, liked them and asked when they could get a thousand more...
I know I can look it up but I wonder if it had directional tires as well. So basically you really could only use that tire for that corner period
Liked and subscribed. The Prowler was a very intriguing vehicle. I was sad that when Plymouth dropped in the all aluminum 3.5 engine, they didn't put in a 5 or 6 spd manual transaxle. That would have given it some credibility. As it is, it's still a beautiful little (faux) hotrod. Cheers!
In 1999 the car was featured in major hip hop music video. Never underestimate the marketing power of rap/hip hop music for the luxury goods market.
Loved the car growing up. It was a cool look that a car company actually made
I always wanted one of these. Still do.
Im a mopar fan for a few reasons. The 2 main reasons is chrysler always tried to make things totally different . And the 2nd reason is everyone has fords and chevys. I have 3 Plymouths at the moment. a 68,69 and 73. Ive also ran mopars in a lot of demolition derbies over the last 40 plus years.
Pretty courageous company back then. Not so much now. Great review of the car.
Jeremy Clarkson was on Top Gear then. He just wasnt in full controll till 2000.
You should do a video on the Toyota T100!!!!!! Great reliable truck
I would love to see a video on the G60 and VR6 Corrado! 1990 G60, That's the one that got away for me. I've owned two antique Pontiacs a 55 Chieftain and a 67 LeMans and the VW Corrado is still THE one that got away.
Came out under the Plymouth name, that name stopped being used. Chrysler picked it up and it still did t sell well cause since it's first day dealers jacked up the prices over double msrp at times.
I've never been a Plymouth fan largely because the last Plymouth worth owning went across the assembly lines in the early 70s. But, I love the Prowler. It's wierd and quirky for sure, and honestly it's most endearing quality is the way is begs you to imagine just how badass it COULD have been if it had been designed during the Hellcat years.
Is that Trevor from the beginning of the video
This looks interesting.
I was 10 in '97 and I wanted that car so bad. I still want one. The purple one.
Loved it as a kid, I still love it now. Although I always used to get this car mixed up with the Panoz Roadster
Those were funky for a "retro" design. However the high bumper required by crash regulations always looked funky or out of place to the rest of the lines of the thing, I could see why people did the delete mod even if it makes the car less roadworthy from a safety standpoint. (Actual classic roadsters either stripped the bumper or kept it down low.)
I love the styles of the Prowler, Viper, PT Cruiser.
Caliber? HHR? SSR?
The Plymouth Prowler is a beautiful unique car especially if they're purple or orange. Ever since I seen one as a preteen I wanted one. Still would love to have one just like I'd love to have a Dodge Copperhead if they actually released them for buyers instead of just using it as a concept car. I never knew that they were only available with automatic transmissions, what a shame because manual transmissions are more fun and faster.
1:31 it was a cool concept with unrealized potential.
These things hold there value so well, thats a testement to how well this car is received.
Awesome video Pat.
I loved the looks of this car.
A turbo charger and a manual transmission would be sweet on one of these, or a V-8 and a manual transmission. Hell, even an in-line four with a turbo and a manual transmission.
It exists, called the Calibur SRT-4....
The 3.5 wasn't gutless but man I spent way too much time wrenching on the one in our '99 Concorde LXi. That whole car had the build quality of an '80s GM.
I didn't know they came in yellow- that is beautiful!