Starship Flight 3 Full Stack Testing + Massey's Flame Trench Updates | Starbase Flyover Update
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 лют 2024
- For usage inquiries please contact us at RGVaerialPhotography@gmail.com
Support us on Patreon to gain access to full quality flyover galleries, round-table analysis and more!: / rgvaerial
paypal.me/rgvaerialteam
We are now doing weekly aerial flyovers depending on the support that we get. Our cost range from pilot fees to rental fees of the Cessna 172 that is used for the flyovers over the sites.
Come join our Discord!
/ discord
Other content creator's footage:
LabPadre Sentinel Cam: ua-cam.com/users/liveIQV0DlS1...
Video Production Team:
Research and Writing Team:
Llamapalooza
Vanta
Peekaboo - x.com/ColeWZY
QC Team:
Stephanie x.com/StephanieAus67?t=CV-Bpc...
Media Managers:
Stephanie x.com/StephanieAus67?t=CV-Bpc...
Video Editor:
Big Water UAV / @bigwateruav
x.com/bigwateruav
Graphics and Renders:
Proky - x.com/bingoboca
TheSpaceEngineer - x.com/mcrs987?t=Acb4mgtUyzpHx...
Voiceover:
Geoff A - x.com/DeffGeff
Photographer:
Irma Atilano
Thanks for Watching! - Наука та технологія
Thank you for the Scottish voice-overs! It's comforting, reminds me of one of my nannas. I could fall asleep listening to her, knowing everything was right in the world. Up to a point, anyway. 😆
I just want to say thank you for keeping up this format and production you do a better job of covering Starbase then anyone...
Love your Starbase Flyover Update! Thank you so much for your work guys :) Many greetings from Germany
Well done, thanks.
thanks for the great work a fan from melbourne australia
10:03 The owner of that patch of land outside the Starfactory must be one massive Richard. Holding out on selling while property prices skyrocket, I imagine.
Love this series!
Excellent clear pics ! To me, you seem to jump around too much on minor/insignificant "stuff", but always good videos !
The farm tank looks weird now 😂
I appreciate you!
nice
Clear and easy to listen to narration done by a human. TY for making this great content.
Thank you for noticing I'm real, I'm accused of being a robot sometimes.
If SpaceX hasn't publicized the test parameters, how do you know if the test was a failure? Maybe the minimal load was all they were testing.
Good point
Because they wouldn't evacuate the entire village and build site for just a partial load test, these 2 attempts were intended to be full wet dress rehearsals and they were aborted.
❤❤
👀🚀👍
👍👍👍🇮🇳
so the general consensus is that the exhaust from static fires will now be directed in Mexico's direction?
The Mexican border is miles from Starbase so what's your point??
@@michaeldeierhoi4096The new static fire pad is being installed at the Massey's test site, and the end of the flame trench is less than 200m from the Mexican river bank. I was quite certain it would face away from Mexico, but that seems not to be the case. Perhaps the flames will be diverted primarily upward.
@@JonathanSchrock 200 m seems to be a bit short of the mark. I have looked at the area on Google maps and have visited the area twice though not Massey specially.
@@michaeldeierhoi4096Jonathan is if anything exaggerating the distance. Massey’s is literally on the Rio Grande - someone working at Massey’s could step straight off the Massey’s site directly into the Rio Grande and the Mexican border runs down the centre line of the river so technically the boundary of the Massey’s site is more like 100 metres from the Mexican border with direct line of sight across to Mexico.
Maybe pointing at the border isn’t too much of an issue if the outlet end of the trench were to also have some upward curvature so that the exhaust exiting the trench is maybe heading 45 degrees upwards towards the vertical rather than at a more shallow horizontal direction more directly towards the Mexican border. An additional mitigation step might be for SpaceX to (if possible) buy or lease the parcel of land in Mexico directly opposite the flame trench simply to securely fence it off and put a load of “danger - no entry” signs all over the place. It doesn’t look from the satellite images as if that land on the Mexican side is used at all.
@@michaeldeierhoi4096 i was asking about the Massey's static fire flame trench...🤨
Cheers. Perhaps not a good idea to indicate where explosives are being held?
It’s called the explosives bunker. It’s not hidden or secret. Lol
Don't worry - site is patrolled/monitored. Agree the launch site has been vulnerable to sabateurs that could cause delay - all 'time' is prescious and any lost time is valuable and hard to make up.
Something to consider about 4:30, could SpaceX be considering a cylindrical mechazilla instead of the current design? Something for catching boosters and ships in different wind or reentry angles...?
Catching the boosters has been scrapped, it was never gonna work. the stubby arms at the tower in florida are proof.
@@drtaru That's you making things up. Which is dishonest AND stupid.
Just curious when will you guys have Elon musk on the weekly RGV aerial photography to discuss what is happening at starbase Massey's and the launch?
I don't think that will ever happen, I think if Musk had his way, he would prevent these photographic overflights.
He has actually been quite supportive of outside photography, he likes RGV tweets regularly and even had one of LabPadre's cameras put back after it was wrongfully removed@@monkeyboy4746
Don't be silly - Elon's time is prescious ! But surely RGV could regularly talk to a Spacex PR type person to obtain some key construction info/data😂, instead of ameteur 'guessing' comments that are not really valid. But I think we can all appreciate these (even if somewhat ameteurish) up-to-date regular weekly vids instead of professional cnn network type crap! Keep going/& improving - you are great!
First like haha😎
"lets compare last flyover with this one" * *proceeds to show two completely different angles* * not helpful at all.
Sir, even an animal can interpret a different angle view of objects.
@@Chleoslyou missed his point. A comparison should be made as easy as possible.
@@Sal3600He said "completely not helpful" and that should needed to be criticized.
My point is, sadly, he(the channel owner) have not that much (of) material to make video much better. He needs selection and concentration, and in his case, it is more likely better to concentrate on the quality and quantity of information, rather than easy-to-understand labor-intensive editing. I know what he wants and I kinda also want that also, but you know, if every demand put in, the quality of video would messed up.
Apologies, this was the first time the weather was good in weeks and so the previous lower flyover altitude of past weeks did not allow for an aligned comparison to be made.
@@RGVAerialPhotographydid they change the minimum altitude you can fly there?