Weird lenses are fun | Blazar Remus 1.5x Anamorphic Unboxing and sample Video

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 18

  • @KaceyBakerFilms
    @KaceyBakerFilms 4 місяці тому +1

    So happy for you.

  • @watzmaaname
    @watzmaaname 3 місяці тому

    Would love to see more footage. Cheers!

  • @juridawedeit
    @juridawedeit 5 місяців тому +1

    great video! i'm very ineterested in buying these lenses!

  • @Garretlike
    @Garretlike 4 місяці тому

    im still a beginner and wanna do a short movie, would it make sense to use the 65mm or any of those with the zv e-10 camera?

  • @yoshiYoishIRL
    @yoshiYoishIRL 4 місяці тому

    what's the full length of these with all of the cover on?

  • @AL3XFPV
    @AL3XFPV 4 місяці тому

    Nice! can you please make a video with the 45mm with a scene with much chromatic abberation at lowest F stop, then I would like to see how increasing the F number have an effect on the chromatic abberation and also bokeh, for me it seems like this lens have way too much CA at T2.0, so wonder if its more usable higher up without loosing to much smooth bokeh

  • @77newskenya
    @77newskenya Місяць тому

    hey keep up with videos. It's been a while

  • @David.g0mes
    @David.g0mes 5 місяців тому +1

    just a heads up, you graded the letterboxes 😉👍

    • @KevinFedde
      @KevinFedde 5 місяців тому

      Ha, good catch! Since I was matching aspect ratios I just had a black matte underneath the anamorphic footage!

  • @thedronetravelers
    @thedronetravelers 5 місяців тому +1

    I finally received these, and I'm having a bit of trouble with aspect ratio since I stink at math, but nevertheless, the lenses are pretty amazing!

    • @owenjenkinsofficial
      @owenjenkinsofficial 5 місяців тому +2

      if your sensor is 16:9, just multiply the 16 (the horizontal measurement that will be desqueezed) with the squeeze. So 16 * 1.5 = 24 -> 24:9 which 24/9 = a 2.67:1 ratio compared to a 2.4:1 or a 2.39:1 ratio that is the usual widescreen. If this was a 2x lens then you'd have a super wide 32:9 or 3.55:1 ratio. If 1.33x stretch, then you'd get a practically perfect 2.39:1 ratio with a 16:9 sensor.

    • @thedronetravelers
      @thedronetravelers 5 місяців тому

      @@owenjenkinsofficial you rock!

  • @iamkubrick
    @iamkubrick 4 місяці тому +1

    Way to much sample footage …

  • @StarskiYall
    @StarskiYall 5 місяців тому

    I have the 45 and the 65, they are amazing

  • @Bo_Hazem
    @Bo_Hazem 5 місяців тому +1

    Did you pay $300 for 3x EF mounts or just $100?

    • @KevinFedde
      @KevinFedde 5 місяців тому +1

      I think it was about $140 or so total. Since I paid in New Zealand Dollars I don’t quite remember how much is was converted to USD.

    • @Bo_Hazem
      @Bo_Hazem 5 місяців тому

      @@KevinFedde Oh so then the $100 is for 3x EF adapters. Thanks a lot!

  • @MightyMigi
    @MightyMigi 5 місяців тому

    I can tell your retention is like 30 secs