"Floating" so much of a house above a sharply pitched lot was decades ahead of its time. To this day, it is extremely rare. Hand it to Wright. He made "bad" sites become spectacular sites. And he did it on a tight budget.❤❤❤
Right! the best projects are when the worst location appears and creates something unique, this is where a master architect can show its capability! thank you for watching!
I was able to visit this house in the late 1970s, and our tour guide was none other than John C. Pew. He is one of a handful of original Wright homeowners I have been fortunate to meet. Mr. Pew apologized for having installed wall to wall carpet and for not being able to show us the bedrooms upstairs. Around the dining room table they had molded plywood chairs by Charles Eames, which look fantastic in that house. The other other original owners I've met include Melvin Maxwell Smith, Louis Penfield, and Carl Wall. If you know Wright's body of work well, you'll know the house these men owned. If not I suppose listing their names here will seem kind of nuts. Anyway, all of these original owners had such enormous pride and enthusiasm for the homes they had built with Wright that they would endure the inconvenience of Wright enthusiasts knocking on their door and sending them letters asking if they could visit. I don't know how endured it all.
What an incredible experience! Meeting John C. Pew and hearing his personal insights must have been unforgettable. It’s fascinating to think about the pride and connection original Wright homeowners had with their houses-they truly embraced the responsibility of living in a piece of architectural history. The detail about the Eames chairs in the dining room is a wonderful touch; they must have complemented the design beautifully. The names you mentioned are like a who’s who of Wright’s legacy, and for those familiar with his work, they’re a testament to the enduring impact of these homes. Thank you for sharing such a rich and personal story-it adds so much depth to the appreciation of Wright’s work!
The public facade is stark and protective, like an 18th century wooden fort. The private facade is, like the prairie style Hardy house that has a similar steep yard over a lake, SPECTACULAR with a breathtaking view.
More or less you are defining the Usonian houses. Close and private from the public area, and transparent and connected with the interior. For that reason was designed these houses, to protect and enhance the family living style of the new americans society .
I am from Barcelona, and for me was one of the most in the world that I studied when I was at the unviersity of architecture. From that time is one of that inspire me. Thank you for sharing.
The parameters demanded a northern exposure for the living room, which is the opposite of Wright's preference. Architects normally have to accept compromises and limitations. Otherwise, usonians would have more bathrooms and more closet space. The days of lavish Prairie style mansions were over. I regret that Wright ignored the option of a bit of southern exposure. It could have happened. Still, it is a fabulous design.
Thank you for sharing. As an architects, we have too many restrictions and more from the clients. Wright reach the capability to do most of his ideas, for that reason, was a master. May we have to learn how to defend our ideas as architects to enrich the client's needs. Thank you for watching!
Thank you for the classic question-it always seems to come up with Wright’s designs! 😊 While his flat roofs and innovative techniques often pushed the boundaries of architecture, they did sometimes come with challenges like leaks. Maintenance and restoration play a big role in preserving these masterpieces today. Thanks for watching and keeping the discussion lively!
Obviously an AI piece…..it is repetitive and utilizes “blending seemlessly into its surroundings” and other repetitive clauses….that said, it is a beautiful home that has survived the test of time.
Thank you for your feedback-it’s greatly appreciated! I understand how repetition can impact the viewing experience, and I’ll work on refining future content to avoid this. That said, I’m glad you recognize the beauty and enduring nature of the Pew House. It truly is a testament to Wright’s timeless design philosophy. Thank you for sharing your thoughts and for watching!
when you show a Frank LLOYD Wright house, show the entire Frank LLOYD Wright house.. meaning, the basement, bathrooms, bedrooms, and other hidden gems of spaces... when I was in Springfield Illinois I took a tour which cost me extra but I went into every nook and cranny of that an entire estate just like I did with the Robie house and in the upstairs bedroom of the master before you go outside and the balcony there is a built-in safe who knew
Thank you for sharing your experience and feedback! Touring Frank Lloyd Wright’s homes in such detail must have been incredible-it’s amazing to discover those hidden gems, like the built-in safe in the Robie House. For videos like this, I aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the house, but I completely understand the desire to see every nook and cranny. Wright’s designs are filled with surprises and intricate details, and I’ll keep your suggestion in mind for future content to ensure a more thorough exploration. Thank you for watching and contributing to the discussion!
Thank you for pointing that out! I appreciate your keen observation and love for the nuances in language. It really does help to convey the beauty of Wright's work!
One of my favorite Wright designs, though, interior spatial arrangement is severely dated as is the the utility, or lack of utility functions. The interior strikes me more as a get away retreat rather then a functional domicile. Views are also limited/wasted by solid projections to carry the esthetic line. Design makes for a petty picture as evidenced by the colored drawing.
Hi! thank you for suggesting, I will take in consideration, but I use to publish by date, so are close to it. Let me review the documents that I have but in case I will prepare it. Thank you for your comment and share your thoughts!
Well, today we do different and we do more connected, but at that time, the idea of having glass windows from floor to ceiling, was genuine at that time introducing the nature at the level of the trees and that transparency from the interior. Remember that at that time houses had small windows. Today we see it normal, but who had that glassing facade in a single home in almost 100 years ago. Thank you for watching and commenting!
Thinking that on 1938 having a tree house on top the trees with easy access, views and this amazing layout where connects nature with the interior house. Thank you for watching and commenting!
Thank you for your feedback! I appreciate your honesty and will take your suggestion into account for future videos. I strive to strike a balance between thoroughness and conciseness, so your input is very helpful. Thank you for watching and sharing your thoughts!
the 1st FL is fine and appropriate, but the 2nd, well...kinda "dull", no? especially without a roof deck, which would seem "do-able"! Kinda fun, too, for it. Sort of a "menacing-looking", for a 2nd home, yes? I'd have painted her a bit, and more flower-filled pergolas! :-) TERRIFIC video, tanx! sub'd/liked
"Floating" so much of a house above a sharply pitched lot was decades ahead of its time. To this day, it is extremely rare. Hand it to Wright. He made "bad" sites become spectacular sites. And he did it on a tight budget.❤❤❤
Right! the best projects are when the worst location appears and creates something unique, this is where a master architect can show its capability! thank you for watching!
The only thing that's shocking about this house is how good it is.
Thank you fro sharing!
I was able to visit this house in the late 1970s, and our tour guide was none other than John C. Pew. He is one of a handful of original Wright homeowners I have been fortunate to meet. Mr. Pew apologized for having installed wall to wall carpet and for not being able to show us the bedrooms upstairs. Around the dining room table they had molded plywood chairs by Charles Eames, which look fantastic in that house. The other other original owners I've met include Melvin Maxwell Smith, Louis Penfield, and Carl Wall. If you know Wright's body of work well, you'll know the house these men owned. If not I suppose listing their names here will seem kind of nuts. Anyway, all of these original owners had such enormous pride and enthusiasm for the homes they had built with Wright that they would endure the inconvenience of Wright enthusiasts knocking on their door and sending them letters asking if they could visit. I don't know how endured it all.
What an incredible experience! Meeting John C. Pew and hearing his personal insights must have been unforgettable. It’s fascinating to think about the pride and connection original Wright homeowners had with their houses-they truly embraced the responsibility of living in a piece of architectural history. The detail about the Eames chairs in the dining room is a wonderful touch; they must have complemented the design beautifully. The names you mentioned are like a who’s who of Wright’s legacy, and for those familiar with his work, they’re a testament to the enduring impact of these homes. Thank you for sharing such a rich and personal story-it adds so much depth to the appreciation of Wright’s work!
The public facade is stark and protective, like an 18th century wooden fort. The private facade is, like the prairie style Hardy house that has a similar steep yard over a lake, SPECTACULAR with a breathtaking view.
More or less you are defining the Usonian houses. Close and private from the public area, and transparent and connected with the interior. For that reason was designed these houses, to protect and enhance the family living style of the new americans society .
I'm french and I just discovered the work of Mr Wright. These houses are a dream .
I am from Barcelona, and for me was one of the most in the world that I studied when I was at the unviersity of architecture. From that time is one of that inspire me. Thank you for sharing.
Welcome m'brotha ❤
In many of his houses the dining area is like a widening of a corridor space. It's interesting to see it as its' own space here.
He works with the layout and space creates the most advanced architect in his times. Today we have adopted many of his inventions.
Genius of FLW was never surpassed.
Thank you for sharing that perspective! FLW's genius really does stand the test of time, doesn't it?
The parameters demanded a northern exposure for the living room, which is the opposite of Wright's preference. Architects normally have to accept compromises and limitations. Otherwise, usonians would have more bathrooms and more closet space. The days of lavish Prairie style mansions were over. I regret that Wright ignored the option of a bit of southern exposure. It could have happened. Still, it is a fabulous design.
Thank you for sharing. As an architects, we have too many restrictions and more from the clients. Wright reach the capability to do most of his ideas, for that reason, was a master. May we have to learn how to defend our ideas as architects to enrich the client's needs. Thank you for watching!
Nice its my new favor Frank loyd Wright's house (pew house )
Thank you, are many projects that surprises how he made it. Thank you for seeing!
As I always ask when it's one of Wright's houses, does the roof leak?
Thank you for the classic question-it always seems to come up with Wright’s designs! 😊 While his flat roofs and innovative techniques often pushed the boundaries of architecture, they did sometimes come with challenges like leaks. Maintenance and restoration play a big role in preserving these masterpieces today. Thanks for watching and keeping the discussion lively!
Amazing .... obviously savoured into glory ❤ .
Hey, thanks for the love!
❤ Beautifu 7:57 l- still the most brilliant architect - unparalleled - Bravo sir
I really appreciate your compliment! It's amazing to see how much admiration there is for Wright's genius.
Obviously an AI piece…..it is repetitive and utilizes “blending seemlessly into its surroundings” and other repetitive clauses….that said, it is a beautiful home that has survived the test of time.
Thank you for your feedback-it’s greatly appreciated! I understand how repetition can impact the viewing experience, and I’ll work on refining future content to avoid this. That said, I’m glad you recognize the beauty and enduring nature of the Pew House. It truly is a testament to Wright’s timeless design philosophy. Thank you for sharing your thoughts and for watching!
when you show a Frank LLOYD Wright house, show the entire Frank LLOYD Wright house.. meaning, the basement, bathrooms, bedrooms, and other hidden gems of spaces... when I was in Springfield Illinois I took a tour which cost me extra but I went into every nook and cranny of that an entire estate just like I did with the Robie house and in the upstairs bedroom of the master before you go outside and the balcony there is a built-in safe who knew
Thank you for sharing your experience and feedback! Touring Frank Lloyd Wright’s homes in such detail must have been incredible-it’s amazing to discover those hidden gems, like the built-in safe in the Robie House. For videos like this, I aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the house, but I completely understand the desire to see every nook and cranny. Wright’s designs are filled with surprises and intricate details, and I’ll keep your suggestion in mind for future content to ensure a more thorough exploration. Thank you for watching and contributing to the discussion!
ChatGPT is in love with the phrases “blends seamlessly” and “integrates seamlessly” 😂
Would have been nice to have an actual architectural historian write the dialogue; would no doubt have been more coherent and less repetitive.
Thank you for pointing that out! I appreciate your keen observation and love for the nuances in language. It really does help to convey the beauty of Wright's work!
I will considere, thank you!
One of my favorite Wright designs, though, interior spatial arrangement is severely dated as is the the utility, or lack of utility functions. The interior strikes me more as a get away retreat rather then a functional domicile.
Views are also limited/wasted by solid projections to carry the esthetic line.
Design makes for a petty picture as evidenced by the colored drawing.
How about the Alvin Miller house and dental clinic additiion, Charles City, Iowa?
Thank you, I have saved to review it and maybe later I will prepare the video. Thank you for watching!
Water damage around windows seems like poor design to me
Thought this was going to be that house in Pennsylvania
How about the Pope-Leighey House or the Seth Peterson Cottage next?
Hi! thank you for suggesting, I will take in consideration, but I use to publish by date, so are close to it. Let me review the documents that I have but in case I will prepare it. Thank you for your comment and share your thoughts!
When I ogle these FLW houses, I wonder why I had to put up with the boxes I’ve lived in.
Do not worry, maybe you did not know Wright, Now you have the opportunity to change it! good luck and thank you for sharing!
I love it, but I dont get the blending seamlessly with its surroundings part.
Well, today we do different and we do more connected, but at that time, the idea of having glass windows from floor to ceiling, was genuine at that time introducing the nature at the level of the trees and that transparency from the interior. Remember that at that time houses had small windows. Today we see it normal, but who had that glassing facade in a single home in almost 100 years ago. Thank you for watching and commenting!
What was it like to live there?
Thinking that on 1938 having a tree house on top the trees with easy access, views and this amazing layout where connects nature with the interior house. Thank you for watching and commenting!
This is great but about twice as long as it needs to be, since they repeat everything at least once.
Thank you for your feedback! I appreciate your honesty and will take your suggestion into account for future videos. I strive to strike a balance between thoroughness and conciseness, so your input is very helpful. Thank you for watching and sharing your thoughts!
This house just needs lasers...so it can be the pew! pew! pew! house.
Sounds like a fun idea! Pew! Pew! Pew!
Please never again repeat the ignorant sentence: Poor mans Falling Water... It is stupid and blunt. - also when repeated.
Thank you for your comment. We will try next time!
the 1st FL is fine and appropriate, but the 2nd, well...kinda "dull", no? especially without a roof deck, which would seem "do-able"! Kinda fun, too, for it. Sort of a "menacing-looking", for a 2nd home, yes? I'd have painted her a bit, and more flower-filled pergolas! :-) TERRIFIC video, tanx! sub'd/liked
Thank you for erring and commenting!
@@antoniiocaluso1071 It has a roof deck, but the 2nd floor is bedrooms, so one only goes there to sleep.
$1.6M 🏡 N😮W! 🙄
Wow, $1.6 million net worth? That's incredible! Keep up the great work!
The exterior wood always looks in bad condition.... What was the original wood trim ?
Yes, it is, maybe has some restoration but are the original ones.
It’s junk
BORING!!!
Thank you, try with another may you find your style!
It might be poor mans falling water but still water , be water be free 🗽🚁🍌🤖🦀🥖🥤🥧🦨@#$%^&*( space program water trail nanotechnology everlasting life
Who knew water could be so philosophical? 😄