The Valentinians: Ancient Christian Gnostics?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
  • Get the exclusive NordVPN deal here: nordvpn.com/rfb. It’s risk free with Nord’s 30 day money-back guarantee!
    Thanks to NordVPN for sponsoring this video.
    Valentinianism was a prominent variety of early Christianity starting in the 2nd century CE. Some call it a form of Gnosticism. But what is Valentinianism all about?
    Join our Patreon community!: / religionforbreakfast
    One-time donations here!: www.paypal.me/...
    Check out my favorite religious studies books by following this affiliate link to my Amazon page: www.amazon.com...
    Further reading:
    Piotr Ashwin-Siejkowski, "Valentinus’ Legacy and Polyphony of Voices" [2022]
    Geoffrey Smith, "Valentinian Christianity" [2020]
    Ismo Dunderberg, "Beyond Gnosticism" [2008]

КОМЕНТАРІ • 928

  • @ReligionForBreakfast
    @ReligionForBreakfast  2 роки тому +44

    Get the exclusive NordVPN deal here: nordvpn.com/rfb. It’s risk free with Nord’s 30 day money-back guarantee!

    • @alananimus9145
      @alananimus9145 2 роки тому +1

      Valentinanism is a Pauline sect.

    • @ForbiddenHistoryLIVE
      @ForbiddenHistoryLIVE 2 роки тому +2

      HELLO DO YOU DO INTERVIEWS ? I AM A TRANSLATOR ... CAN SEND YOU SAMPLES OF MY TRANSLATION PROJECT.
      Dezert

    • @jacovawernett3077
      @jacovawernett3077 2 роки тому

      Could you delve into the Jacobites.?

    • @pocohax6552
      @pocohax6552 2 роки тому

      I don’t think they always referring to Jesus when they describing the sons of god

    • @bethbartlett5692
      @bethbartlett5692 2 роки тому

      Consider this:
      *The Defining*
      It's the "defining that can create the misunderstanding", example: "belief in a lower Creator god", (can mean, a knowledge of a physical being that was involved in a scientific DNA manipulation that resulted in Modern Homosapiens, and this based on Ancient Knowledge/Sumerian Texts, and the label "god/little g" having a title relative to that like the British "lord", and not to be confused with the Creator, Source, *God* ...
      It is a matter of how the use of the title indicates "having a part in creating something", later an interpretation that was in line with Social Levels.
      (when we are absent or not as familiar with a previous foundation, the observation can appear most distorted to our understanding.)
      Gnostics had Ancient Knowledge and thus existed prior to Yeshua, and he made a major "add on value thru his gifts, studies, and accomplishments" (this included the Hermetic Principals aka Universal Laws, particularly the "Universal Law of Attraction")

  • @TheEsotericaChannel
    @TheEsotericaChannel 2 роки тому +469

    Wonderful! Actually working on an episode on the Epistle to Flora and Summer Harvest for next week!

    • @ReligionForBreakfast
      @ReligionForBreakfast  2 роки тому +78

      Awesome. I wasn't able to squeeze Summer Harvest into this video.

    • @TheEsotericaChannel
      @TheEsotericaChannel 2 роки тому +72

      @@ReligionForBreakfast It's tiny anyway - the whole episode will be 'gnostic' texts only preserved in polemical sources, including a 'cathar' text preserved in Durand of Huesca's c.1222 Liber Contra Manicheos - Many thanks as always for your work and inspiration, Andrew!

    • @M-i-k-a-e-l
      @M-i-k-a-e-l 2 роки тому

      That is beyond fat! 🥰

    • @theeccentrictripper3863
      @theeccentrictripper3863 2 роки тому +37

      @@TheEsotericaChannel Best crossover ever, feels like the universe is collapsing every time I see two creators I watch interacting

    • @PunkRockPetSitter
      @PunkRockPetSitter 2 роки тому +5

      I am SO THERE!!!! 😆👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

  • @NightDocs
    @NightDocs 2 роки тому +160

    I’m so fascinated with Gnosticism please keep covering this stuff!

    • @fluentpiffle
      @fluentpiffle 2 роки тому +3

      There is one biblical story that intrigues me, and that is the story of Noah. I think this may be a timeless anecdote that we can apply to any 'knower' of today. It then takes on the form of a kind of collective unconscious prediction, as anyone who followed the trail of truth would ultimately find themselves in the same position as the biblical character, and likely HAS done through the ages..Giordano Bruno, for instance..
      This would explain why the story retains an air of credibility. The events unfolding in the story WOULD mimic the real life situation in ANY age, given that the underlying nature of Humans remains roughly the same. Behaviour is predictable once it wears itself into a pattern, and that in itself is a perfect example of how nature works, at the fundamental level..

    • @isaacleillhikar4566
      @isaacleillhikar4566 2 роки тому

      I make vidéos about it. Like "Is the Protoecagelium by the gnostics."

    • @BMXOPHY
      @BMXOPHY Рік тому +1

      In case you are interested, Gnosticism has now evolved into Anthroposophy, aka, contemporary Rosicrucian/Manichean gnosticism.

    • @patrickbrumm4120
      @patrickbrumm4120 Рік тому

      if you listen to podcasts try Talk Gnosis

  • @brandonfrench9379
    @brandonfrench9379 2 роки тому +56

    I am overwhelmingly thankful to see Dr. Ismo Dunderberg and his research mentioned. He has provided exceptional insight into the Valentinians, and his book "Beyond Gnosticism" is a must read for anyone looking for in-depth information into the School of Valentinus.

    • @dustindavis55
      @dustindavis55 2 роки тому

      It’s too bad his books are so expensive. One as much as 270 dollars on Amazon. Where can one find more affordable copies?

    • @brandonfrench9379
      @brandonfrench9379 2 роки тому +3

      @@dustindavis55 I agree that his books are expensive, but I "Beyond Gnosticism" is worth the $60. I don't know of a way to get the books for a lower price, I wish I did though.

    • @commenter3326
      @commenter3326 2 роки тому +2

      @@dustindavis55 Libgen.

    • @BonJoviBeatlesLedZep
      @BonJoviBeatlesLedZep 2 роки тому +1

      @@brandonfrench9379 There are subreddits where one can obtain knowledge of dark arts in order to procure precious and expensive artefacts such as this book. That's all I shall say.

    • @eternalism8274
      @eternalism8274 Рік тому

      i looked up the book Beyond Gnosticism and I was surprised that Amazon says i have it 🤷‍♂️🤯 and i bought it used in 2013, shipped 2014, paid $15. i hope i found it enlightening 😞
      i assume i have read Michael Wms Against 'Gnosticism'; found a pdf of his previous 1977 dissertation revision The Immovable Raec the other day on the theme of Stability ($160)

  • @AntonBryl
    @AntonBryl 2 роки тому +19

    The "Angel of the Great/Mightly Council" title is very familiar to the Eastern Orthodox tradition. It is apparently how one of the bits of the famous "Wonderful, Counseller, The mighty God..." passage in Isaiah is translated in Septuagint and, consequently, in the translations dependent on it (e.g. into Church Slavonic).

  • @dddboom
    @dddboom 2 роки тому +121

    Wow. Extremely interesting, wish I knew so much more about the various "Gnostic" beliefs such a shame so much is lost to time or undiscovered.

    • @DBCisco
      @DBCisco 2 роки тому +23

      and ignored as well misrepresented.

    • @bobSeigar
      @bobSeigar 2 роки тому +38

      And intentionally suppressed

    • @TimeWaster_Elite
      @TimeWaster_Elite 2 роки тому +9

      @@bobSeigar bingo.

    • @tehufn
      @tehufn 2 роки тому +11

      Thankfully died out. They were often, as it says in the beginning of the video, polytheistic. Gnosticism is the oldest Christian heresy, even predating Christianity (hence its polytheism). It is of Greece, not of Jerusalem.

    • @bobSeigar
      @bobSeigar 2 роки тому +36

      @@tehufn Christianity came out of Rome, not Jerusalem. Also, Gnostics are a much more diverse set of groups than you are attempting to paint them as.

  • @hfranklin2009
    @hfranklin2009 Місяць тому

    I really enjoyed this! Thank you.

  • @AIagremm
    @AIagremm 2 роки тому

    I was hoping for a video about the Valentinians! Delightful.

  • @zacharyhenderson2902
    @zacharyhenderson2902 2 роки тому +2

    There is always something so tempting, so exotic, yet oddly familiar sounding about gnostic theologies. I don't believe any of it, but they are strangely convincing for ideas that just popped into the minds of baffled people.

  • @aquafieldrocks
    @aquafieldrocks 2 роки тому +6

    “…the Valentinians were not making this stuff out of thin pneuma”
    …well played!

  • @--Paws--
    @--Paws-- 2 роки тому +2

    Aeons in Final Fantasy are guardians which can be befriended and be summoned to aid in battle.

  • @freethinker79
    @freethinker79 Рік тому +1

    I feel "Gnosticism" explains our reality the best.

  • @3RAcademy
    @3RAcademy 2 роки тому +4

    Do you think that Valentinus (or his teachers) would have had access to the yogic idea of the three gunas when formulating the concept behind three essences (hylic, psychic, pneumatic) ?

  • @enternalinferno
    @enternalinferno 2 роки тому +1

    Of course it’s another great video from rfb, but I hope I can critic the length of the disclaimer. The video starts at 7:10 you could argue

  • @lifeonthemark8210
    @lifeonthemark8210 Рік тому +1

    Valentinian cosmology reminds me a great deal of Middle Earth’s; I wonder if Tolkien took some gnostic inspiration for his works.

  • @doriesse824
    @doriesse824 2 роки тому +1

    I think you've mixed up aeons with eons. "A"eons are the attributes of the Father which He emanated from the Pleroma. The text @0:31 says they were the "heavenly faces", but you are referring to them in your commentary as "ages", which is where "e"ons comes in.

  • @dangelamarx80
    @dangelamarx80 2 роки тому +3

    That Poem at the beginning was sooooo beautiful. One time I had a vision with my eyes open, it was the strongest vision I ever had. It was like I got transported to the throne of God but when it was my turn to stand before him the light was so strong and so bright and it was coupled with this indescribable sense of Majesty, reverence and the deepest fear Ive ever felt. So when I hear beautiful language to describe Gods light and I recognize the yearning to be close to the feet of the all attractive…. It just (sigh) I feel like someone else gets it.

  • @happierabroad
    @happierabroad Рік тому +1

    How come you don't have a video about the Cathars?

  • @SteinGauslaaStrindhaug
    @SteinGauslaaStrindhaug 2 роки тому +1

    If you think of religion as _just_ a personal belief system like many atheists often do today; all this infighting seems rather bizarre. Why would anyone care if someone else's beliefs was slightly different? But it makes much more sense if you realise that almost all religions to a large part about control* and politics and therefore money. If you think about it that way, it makes more sense that they would be even more aggressively fighting small deviations in faith than more fundamentally different religions. If you allow small variants of your religion to separate out it reduces your influence; and it's much easier to retain or convert back people who already share 95% of your concept of the religion than somebody who barely share any similarity. It's very similar to how in secular democratic politics (particularly in winner takes all systems), deviation from the party line is very heavily policed because if you allow "disloyalty" it it can cause splitting of the party which can reduce the party's influence.
    In more proportional representation system, splitting a party is not as bad because as long as both parties after a split still agree on most issues and both get enough votes to be represented they can still cooperate against the very different parties. And I guess in countries today with declining religiosity and rising atheism, even the religions are no longer as aggressively hostile to all the subdivisions because they need to cooperate with each other to represent the religious principles they agree on, in an increasingly secular system; because none of them have the political power alone to control everything like they used to in the middle ages.
    (* maybe some smaller, and eventually extinct religions; are not about control to the same extent. But certainly it is for the leadership of larger expansionist religions like the big churches)

  • @wormwoodcocktail
    @wormwoodcocktail Рік тому

    21:31 i really really really like this image

  • @sallyhazy
    @sallyhazy 2 роки тому +3

    Honestly, this idea of categorizing humanity into types of substance sounds straight up from a young adult sci-fi novel like divergent lol

    • @ihavenojawandimustscream4681
      @ihavenojawandimustscream4681 2 роки тому +6

      Most sci-fi novels used a simplified versions of modern or classical philosophies.
      To predict the future,people usually look to the past.

  • @Artem_Gratis
    @Artem_Gratis 11 місяців тому

    “Pneuma” sounds like a synonym for mushroom.

  • @bubbercakes528
    @bubbercakes528 2 роки тому +3

    The catholic church invented the bible we know today.

  • @todradmaker4297
    @todradmaker4297 11 місяців тому

    Didn't Irenaeus use the term "gnostics" to describe the Valentinians and Simonians in his Against Heresies?

  • @HorseloverFat1984
    @HorseloverFat1984 4 місяці тому

    The most beautiful of all Christian cosmologies. I love it. It's a shame that it didn't become Christian Orthodoxy.

  • @straightupanarg6226
    @straightupanarg6226 2 роки тому

    "Think like an ancient physicist," nice Legal Eagle reference

  • @pixelprincess9
    @pixelprincess9 Рік тому

    Dr. Henry, in your professional opinion, how mainstream was Gnosticism compared to proto-orthodoxy? There are 50-60 million nontrinitarian Christians in the world today, but that’s only around 2.5% of the total Christian population; most Christians would characterise nontrinitarianism as a fringe belief. Were gnostics in the 2nd and 3rd centuries in a similar position or were they a much larger chunk of the Christian communities? Thank you.

  • @scienceseekerresearcher6130
    @scienceseekerresearcher6130 2 роки тому +2

    Gnosticism theology is too complex, no wonder only elites followed it, for simple masses it was a huge headache to even get a grasp of the gnostic understanding.

  • @canisronis2753
    @canisronis2753 Рік тому

    Thanks!

  • @dickcole5628
    @dickcole5628 Рік тому

    Another very good teaching thank you

  • @rad4924
    @rad4924 2 роки тому +260

    "Not making things out of thin pneuma."
    I noticed the subtle joke. I laughed.

    • @matthewwallack601
      @matthewwallack601 2 роки тому +6

      I was going to comment about this lol

    • @Mari_Oh
      @Mari_Oh 2 роки тому +12

      And flawlessly delivered with a straight face!

    • @rylepurple1996
      @rylepurple1996 Рік тому

      Why he used word "Pneuma? in english bible?" he can just use the word "Spirit"so international people can easily understand. he just used Pneuma to fit ideas of Valentinians.

  • @jeffaltier5582
    @jeffaltier5582 2 роки тому +679

    I find Valentinians, Sethians, Hermeticists, and all so called Gnosticism to be utterly fascinating.

    • @DrownedinDesigner
      @DrownedinDesigner 2 роки тому +45

      I just think they’re heretics.

    • @francescoazzoni3445
      @francescoazzoni3445 2 роки тому

      @@DrownedinDesigner based and ireneus-pilled

    • @mhertin660
      @mhertin660 2 роки тому +131

      @@DrownedinDesigner heresy can be fascinating

    • @nosuchthing8
      @nosuchthing8 2 роки тому +3

      @@DrownedinDesigner they didn't set out to be heretics

    • @namelessdark4701
      @namelessdark4701 2 роки тому +43

      @@DrownedinDesigner hindsight is 20/20

  • @alanb8884
    @alanb8884 2 роки тому +125

    There's a sci-fi book calked Mysterium, by Robert Charles Wilson where a small Michigan town gets pulled into an alternate reality where Valentinus DID become Bishop of Rome and a gnostic form of Christianity became orthodox.
    One line resounded with me. The new world's religious investigators found the Christianity of the transported townsfolk almost Jewish in nature, due to their strict monotheism.

    • @mikeryan4055
      @mikeryan4055 Рік тому +7

      Sounds like a good book, thanks for that.

  • @jackstrawful
    @jackstrawful 2 роки тому +234

    Went straight from here to listening to a reading of the entire Tripartite Tractate - about 2 hrs long. Despite it's ethereal subject matter and esoteric jargon, I think it's quite easy for a modern person to absorb, because it's written more like a logical thesis than a typical piece of scripture. It's so clearly written by a highly intelligent Hellenic person who has accepted the Jewish savior and aspects of Jewish mysticism and is trying to re-imagine them in a way that makes more sense to a Greek mind. Utterly fascinating.

    • @phillipstroll7385
      @phillipstroll7385 2 роки тому +12

      Jewish savior? Who would that be? I didn't know the Jewish religion had a savior. They've had many as far as I can tell. The one they called Christ was Simon. Then bar korhba. Certainly not Jesus. Every savior they claimed was their savior they dismissed after their failure. Just as they claimed god had an earthly house, the temple. Until their temples continued to be destroyed. Then suddenly nope. They didn't need a temple and they gave it away. So you see my confusion by your statement

    • @DoctorDee33
      @DoctorDee33 Рік тому +7

      @@phillipstroll7385 you are correct Phil.
      The idea of mashiach (messiah ) is an ancient one in Judaism. Well, sort of. It developed over the years. The messianic concept was introduced later in the history of Judaism, during the age of the prophets. the messianic concept is not explicitly mentioned anywhere in the Torah (the first five books of the Bible).
      The Jewish idea of mashiach (messiah / ) is a great human leader like King David, not a savior.
      The literal translation of the Hebrew word mashiach (המשיח, messiah), is 'anointed', which refers to a ritual of consecrating someone or something by putting holy oil upon it.
      & this comment was for Al
      Cheers!

    • @stustig9430
      @stustig9430 Рік тому +1

      Yes, although the Valentinians were not totally right at least they were trying - goes for most of us

    • @hermanhale9258
      @hermanhale9258 Рік тому +5

      @@phillipstroll7385 Probably better to say "the Zoroastrian savior". Meaning, the idea of a savior.

    • @ryujin2101
      @ryujin2101 Рік тому

      Utterly Ridiculous, the Minds of Morons merely seemed to be reproduced Over n Over, no Intellectual being buys such, they merely make Us t Control the Simple one's and profit OFF THEIR WEAK minds.
      And still today Terrorism is a Good tool to USE and Profit of simple one's.

  • @erinpilla
    @erinpilla 7 місяців тому +4

    If this strand of Christianity (i.e. Gnostic Christianities) was the one that survived to this day, I definitely would have remained Christian

  • @samuelfraley8737
    @samuelfraley8737 2 роки тому +87

    This channel gives me so many interesting topics to discuss with my dad. Thanks Andrew!

    • @SapphoKore
      @SapphoKore Рік тому +4

      How nice to have these discussions together. I love it. ❤

  • @shawnboisclair3696
    @shawnboisclair3696 2 роки тому +76

    As always, an interesting analysis of this religous system. Real history, people and their beliefs are always far more interesting and diverse than we tend to believe because of our prism of experience and beliefs.

    • @NinaR478
      @NinaR478 2 роки тому +5

      It’s interesting and diverse always, it’s not our faith that obstructs that but often time the privilege many have that they do not feel the need to listen or acknowledge others

  • @pathkeepers
    @pathkeepers 2 роки тому +9

    Naming my next dog or child Pseudo-Tertullian

  • @amjadkchy
    @amjadkchy 2 роки тому +67

    I went and re-watched your 2015 video on gnosticism and it was really interesting to see the consistency of your arguments and the evolution of your style. Out of curiosity, do you ever revisit your old videos, and how do you feel about them?

    • @ReligionForBreakfast
      @ReligionForBreakfast  2 роки тому +82

      Some of them hold up. Generally I cringe at the production quality.

    • @sorceresque647
      @sorceresque647 2 роки тому +21

      @@ReligionForBreakfast To be able to look back at your past and see its deficiencies is a sign that you're improving in your craft! It's been great to see the organic evolution of your presentation style.
      Art is full of malformed first attempts, but we aim to love them all anyway. 😊 But judging by your trajectory, I can see great things ahead!

    • @Napoleonic_S
      @Napoleonic_S 2 роки тому +5

      @@ReligionForBreakfast
      Man, can you teach us where did these gnosticism cosmology come from? Was it based on Jewish or pagan ideas? Or both?
      And why ultimately the orthodox Christianity rejected those cosmology ideas?

    • @TheMrcassina
      @TheMrcassina 2 роки тому

      @@ReligionForBreakfast you can be funny too

  • @Breakable_Pencil
    @Breakable_Pencil 2 роки тому +81

    The bride groom and bridal chamber play a large role in Eastern Orthodox theology, specifically surrounding the crucifixion and the church’s role as the bride of Christ.

    • @DISTurbedwaffle918
      @DISTurbedwaffle918 2 роки тому +19

      These also are still maintained in Catholic theology, both Western and Eastern.

    • @noahsolomon1550
      @noahsolomon1550 2 роки тому +2

      So enlightening

    • @BonJoviBeatlesLedZep
      @BonJoviBeatlesLedZep 2 роки тому +7

      @@DISTurbedwaffle918 Yeah, I was about to say. That metaphorical relationship was used a lot by the priest of my Roman Catholic church growing up. But in my diocese, they rotate priests throughout the country every few years. And ideologies change between priests so perhaps it's not as widespread an analogy as I had thought.

    • @DISTurbedwaffle918
      @DISTurbedwaffle918 2 роки тому +3

      @@BonJoviBeatlesLedZep
      Some priests are bigger theologians than others. The one you have now probably just isn't as advanced in his knowledge.

    • @Me-hf4ii
      @Me-hf4ii 7 місяців тому

      The bride groom and bridal chamber imagery is part of all Christianity - orthodox, East, west, Protestant - all of it… doesn’t mean the rest of the theology is in accord with what Jesus actually taught.
      Eastern and Western Catholic Churches are too devoted to a woman called Mary for my taste. Too fleshly of an interpretation of the Miracle of Christ’s incarnation - and it’s very much like she has been deified in these churches.
      Yes He really came in the flesh - but he could have chosen a prostitute just as easily as a virgin. He chose the virgin to highlight the Miracle (a pregnant prostitute isn’t something all that odd - but a pregnant virgin shows people something very peculiar has happened) - and if Mary of Nazareth had said no, he would have found another woman who would have said yes.

  • @wompa70
    @wompa70 2 роки тому +59

    Being in these early groups must have been fascinating. Not only do you have people raised Jewish you have people coming from a Greek and Roman background.

    • @Noizzed
      @Noizzed Місяць тому +1

      And also, simply being in a world of which nobody knew it's limits, it's physical rules, the reason for many natural phenomenons to exist. You're in a group of people from all places trying to figure out the spiritual nature of existence.

  • @feigenblatt
    @feigenblatt 2 роки тому +37

    I just found your channel and your introduction alone had me sold. The clarity, care and respect with which you present the historical context, prejudices and misconceptions are extraordinary. And the quality of the presentation holds up until the end.
    Now I have backlog of videos to watch. I promise to not pay much attention to the production quality of your early videos 😜

  • @PhDTony_original
    @PhDTony_original 2 роки тому +33

    I recently read a translation of the Gospel of Truth and had immense difficulty understanding what the authors meant by "spirit" and "soul". This presentation helped a lot.

    • @ANDROLOMA
      @ANDROLOMA 2 роки тому

      Was the Gospel of Truth among the trove at Nag Hammadi?

    • @PhDTony_original
      @PhDTony_original 2 роки тому +8

      @@ANDROLOMA Yes, it survives as a Coptic text from the Nag Hammadi trove now stored in Cairo's Coptic Museum.
      Edit: there are other sources - the translation I read claimed this is the most complete version.

    • @ANDROLOMA
      @ANDROLOMA 2 роки тому

      @@PhDTony_original Today, I learned something new. Thank you, Tony.

    • @eternalism8274
      @eternalism8274 Рік тому

      i extracted the 3-tier scheme of Body/ Soul/ Spirit from Pagels' first two books (Johannine, Pauline writings).
      Soul = exoteric freewillist moral-agency thinking;
      Spirit = esoteric no-free-will thinking (non-branching block universe altered state experience)

  • @Flamarius
    @Flamarius 2 роки тому +13

    The Valentinians weren't making this stuff up out of thin pneuma 😂😂😂

    • @ReligionForBreakfast
      @ReligionForBreakfast  2 роки тому +13

      Show up for the religious studies scholarship. Stay for the gnostic-themed dad jokes.

    • @samrevlej9331
      @samrevlej9331 Рік тому +1

      @@ReligionForBreakfast You know you've peaked as a specific nerd culture when you have inside dad jokes.

  • @straightupanarg6226
    @straightupanarg6226 2 роки тому +78

    One of my youthful follies was looking into gnosticism, and somehow it managed to fly right over my head that gnosticism was a stream of Christianity, and that the "demiurge" theology is a cosmological attempt for Christians to reconcile God as he appears in the Old Testament, with the God that Jesus teaches.
    Somehow (I won't say how) I kept thinking of gnosticism as a kind of seperare philosophy, rather than as a branch of explicitly Christian thought. It makes so much more sense now. Thanks!

    • @Plethorality
      @Plethorality 2 роки тому +9

      well it is not as if we proestants were taught that there was any other approach than our particular denominaton, that was not heresy, thus wrong. we had all tge answers and questions were not allowed.

    • @TheGuiltsOfUs
      @TheGuiltsOfUs Рік тому

      They never understood rabbi Yeshua in the first place, radical Torah observance - not its abandonment for pagan ideas!

    • @TheSulross
      @TheSulross Рік тому +14

      that is the one core feature of these various so-called Gnostic Christians and the Marcionite Christians - they all had huge problems with the Jewish deity Yahweh of the Hebrew bible and found that figure irreconcilable with Yeshua.
      That is what is so facinsting about Christianity as it spread among Hellinistic Roman Empire - so many found the ancient Hebrew deity as a very off-putting, even repulsive figure (Marcion doesn't hold back at all in that regard)

    • @Me-hf4ii
      @Me-hf4ii 7 місяців тому

      @@TheGuiltsOfUsso the Council of Jerusalem was wrong? Jesus most beloved apostle, John, or renounced the idea of radical Torah observance as “judiazing” was wrong? Hmm… your Jesus doesn’t seem to know how to pick people very well if they got something so central so wrong so soon after His ascension.

    • @igorlopes7589
      @igorlopes7589 7 місяців тому

      ​@@Me-hf4iiYou ignore that there is a middle position between judaizers and marcionites/gnostics. That position is that the God of the OT is good and that He established a New Covenant in which the jewish-specific parts of the Halakhah are declared to be fulffilled by Christ and not necessary to follow anymore. This was the position at the Jerusalem Council, they deemed the God of the OT to be good and yet didn't believe the Halakhah was still binding

  • @w0197
    @w0197 2 роки тому +14

    I love your videos on first century Christianity. Very different from what my culty Baptist bible college taught me lol This time in church history is wild.

  • @FlyingAlfredoSaucer
    @FlyingAlfredoSaucer 2 роки тому +25

    Are you ever planning on making a video about the Didache? Also thanks for this video Valentinians are a group I've always found interesting.

    • @ReligionForBreakfast
      @ReligionForBreakfast  2 роки тому +22

      Yeah I'd really like to. I've always been fascinated by the Didache, and it'd be a nice follow-up to the Shepherd of Hermas video.

    • @CJ-uk1rt
      @CJ-uk1rt 2 роки тому +7

      @@ReligionForBreakfast thanks for making a video on the Shepard of Hermas. I had no idea it existed. I've learnt so much from your channel.

    • @Nick.T.A
      @Nick.T.A 2 роки тому +3

      @@ReligionForBreakfast Please do! I have always wanted to know more about the Didache

    • @PaulClermont
      @PaulClermont 2 роки тому +5

      strange i just learned that the Didache exists yesterday- in addition to the rest of the "Apostolic Father" writings (Letters of Clement, Ignatius, Polycarp, etc)
      Literally about to buy Holmes' compilation

    • @samlatin8933
      @samlatin8933 2 роки тому

      @@PaulClermont is there an amazon link to this

  • @termsofusepolice
    @termsofusepolice 2 роки тому +57

    The Valentinians had a method they used to rescue humans from suffocating, spiritual darkness and bring them into the light. They called it the Hylic Maneuver.

    • @ANDROLOMA
      @ANDROLOMA 2 роки тому +6

      Heimlich?

    • @MoonChild-jq2dm
      @MoonChild-jq2dm Рік тому +1

      LOL

    • @NicolasPrince-j8k
      @NicolasPrince-j8k Рік тому

      Yeah but for it to work you have to make sure the banking cartel doesn’t shut your life in America down first cause they are so great and kind and care all about our sons

    • @orangemanbad
      @orangemanbad Рік тому +3

      Hahaha. That was hilarious

    • @fremiloant1186
      @fremiloant1186 Рік тому

      @@NicolasPrince-j8k
      Such things dont exist, you're delusional

  • @ketsuekikumori9145
    @ketsuekikumori9145 2 роки тому +8

    "How many people who could say 'you can measure a soul on a scale'?"
    There is at least 1 man I can think of. Duncan MacDougall and his 21 grams experiment.

  • @brandonrichmond4711
    @brandonrichmond4711 2 роки тому +24

    I just did a paper for one of my religion classes on Gnostic literature with Valentinian cosmology at the center. It was really fun, excited for this video.

  • @Arcanismedia
    @Arcanismedia 2 роки тому +14

    Valentinian theology heavily influences my own spiritual beliefs. I appreciate this video.

    • @joannebrown6540
      @joannebrown6540 Рік тому +2

      Especially regarding Yahweh, in my belief. He is not The Father of Yeshua.

    • @bobSeigar
      @bobSeigar Рік тому

      ​@@joannebrown6540 yshu = 'May his name be obliterated'

    • @igorlopes7589
      @igorlopes7589 7 місяців тому +2

      ​@@joannebrown6540The earliest christian writtings suggest otherwise. I would trust the earliest christians, who wrote the OT, over the late second century christians who wrote the gnostic gospels and books

  • @bromponie7330
    @bromponie7330 2 роки тому +46

    The Valentinians were also early sources that link the fourth Gospel to the disciple John as author. This testifies to the antiquity of the tradition, being shared by those of multiple schools of thought.

    • @Ancipital_
      @Ancipital_ 2 роки тому +2

      All one has to do is to read St. Iranaeus' Against Heresies to see that yes, Jesus had quite the impact and had many thinkers scrambling from left to right trying to make sense of what had transpired.

    • @ohamatchhams
      @ohamatchhams Рік тому

      @@Ancipital_ Nay, one has to see the successes of the growth, spread and strengthening of Islam which is the fulfilment of any genuine prophecy, regardless from the Nicene to "Gnostic" sources of Christianity and any other religions
      Nicene Christianity, especially it's Western variants, is already a failure at even protecting it's authenticity, whether of being "genuine"/"orthodox", "universal"/"catholic", lutheran, nestorian, calvinist, evangelical and any other labels which deemed to be failures after centuries of corruptions

  • @crush3095
    @crush3095 2 роки тому +4

    I think there was a 70s or 80s Gnostic movement in South America
    like a cult, my parents were part of it, my middle name is the same as the leader's >__<
    luckily my parents were just dumb hippies so they moved from cult to cult before getting lazy and abandoning all haha

  • @byronomboy
    @byronomboy Рік тому +4

    The idea of bride, bridegroom, bridal chamber, etc. is very familiar to those practicing meditation that conveys the esoteric meaning of the bride (soul), uniting to the Bridegroom (God, Ocean, etc.) for eternal salvation.

    • @TheGuiltsOfUs
      @TheGuiltsOfUs Рік тому

      Rabbi Yeshua knew nothing of such pagan ideas

  • @isaacleillhikar4566
    @isaacleillhikar4566 2 роки тому +4

    Hi.
    Gnostics is used by Ireneas in his Book against hérésies. Its title once was "Countering what is falsly called Knowlege (Gnostia)" quoting Paul in the Bible.

  • @JonathanMichael
    @JonathanMichael 2 роки тому +16

    Thanks for the informative video sir. It does makes me wonder how would the modern world be like if these “Gnostic” branches survived. The early church fathers wrote way too many polemics against their gnostic opponents but none of the works they antagonize survived which is kinda disappointing. I think even the church fathers Origen (homily on Luke), Epiphanius (Panarion), and Jerome (commentary on Matthew) wrote commentaries about the first chapter of Luke discussing about the “many who have taken account” pertaining to these heretical works of Basilides, Cerinthus, Merinthus, and other non canonical gospels.

    • @funnyWOMAB7048
      @funnyWOMAB7048 Рік тому +2

      Honestly people who have similar beliefs to the gnostics have continuously re-emerged so many times I'd argue it wouldn't be much different as it is now.
      I mean if the valentinians survived id imagine they'd be like the modern johannites or the ecclesia gnostica in France and the us, or the Cathars or the bogomils, or Carl Jung fans ig

    • @barrymoore4470
      @barrymoore4470 Рік тому

      @@funnyWOMAB7048 Gnosticism essentially strikes me as Christianity infused with liberal helpings of Platonic idealism. Platonic thought is foundational to Western philosophy, so I agree that Gnostic survival would have left the world looking much as we have it today, and explains why variations of Gnostic thought recur throughout Western history.

  • @jftucker
    @jftucker 2 роки тому +15

    I've really struggled to wrap my head around Valentinianism for the longest time. This was helpful.

    • @STho205
      @STho205 2 роки тому +1

      The three pure forms of the universe is the most helpful part of this presentation, especially tying it to the letters attributed to Paul untranslated from the oldest Greek.

  • @peterpiper487
    @peterpiper487 2 роки тому +2

    This crap gets so complicated that it's no wonder the average man, and even the very educated, get tangled up and stumble on the fact that it's all CRAP.

    • @ohamatchhams
      @ohamatchhams 2 роки тому

      You're just at low temperature IQ lol

  • @matthewcarter2500
    @matthewcarter2500 2 роки тому +11

    Thank you, Andrew! This is wonderful as always! And it comes during the beginning of Orthodox Holy Week, where we have the Bridegroom Matins services, which also use the bridal chamber imagery! I don't know if you planned that, but it works out very well!

  • @danlds17
    @danlds17 Рік тому +2

    Be a heretic, wear it like a badge of courage.

  • @Taco0718
    @Taco0718 2 роки тому +6

    Love to see an episode on Ebionites and their modern spiritual descendants the Talmidi Jews

  • @Svartalf14
    @Svartalf14 2 роки тому +9

    Thanks, I'm definitely no scholar of christianity, and even less of early christian movements and philosophies, but you do help me make more sense of what little I know.

  • @ActiveAdvocate1
    @ActiveAdvocate1 2 роки тому +3

    The Bride of Christ imagery is still used in Catholicism. I don't know if any other sect uses it, but when I was still a Catholic, I heard the Catholic church referred to as the "Bride of Christ" all the time. THAT trope is nothing new, either. Eros and Psyche, anyone? It's the most "Christian" of pre-Christian myths.

    • @dimitartodorov4826
      @dimitartodorov4826 2 роки тому +2

      The Bride of Christ is used in protestant as well as eastern orthodox churches. Do you know why? Because it comes directly from scripture.

  • @ayushshukla2917
    @ayushshukla2917 2 роки тому +12

    HI brother! Thanks for the video. One question- Will you make videos explaining Philosophies of Hinduism in future. There are many dharmic philosophies with many people explaining in different ways. Would love to listen your perspective on them.

    • @ReligionForBreakfast
      @ReligionForBreakfast  2 роки тому +16

      Yes, I am currently in the early stages of producing an Intro to Hinduism series. Two episodes are already written. You can expect the series to launch in a few months.

    • @ayushshukla2917
      @ayushshukla2917 2 роки тому +2

      @@ReligionForBreakfast Thanks buddy❤

  • @sem_identitificador
    @sem_identitificador 2 роки тому +4

    Please make a video on Pierre Teilhard de Chardin the jesuit priest and paleontologist who tried to unite darwinian evolutionary theory with christian catholic cosmology creating a whole new thing: the omega point

  • @michaelmargaritis5526
    @michaelmargaritis5526 2 роки тому +3

    PseudoTertulian sounds like the 5th teenage mutant ninja turtle

  • @hermanhale9258
    @hermanhale9258 2 роки тому +4

    There's nothing wrong with calling them by their founder's name. It's a helpful label. Makes no difference if some ancient writer hated them or not.

  • @Imladris-lm3bo
    @Imladris-lm3bo 2 роки тому +7

    Such a fantastic channel, never ceases to amaze me. One day you should do a video about the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom - I would be fascinated to hear you talk about it.

  • @richardglady3009
    @richardglady3009 2 роки тому +8

    That was an immensely deep presentation. Thank you very much for all your research and work putting this video together. I love your perspective, so often forgotten, that “Gnostics” were Christians.

  • @thornsilverhollysong1715
    @thornsilverhollysong1715 2 роки тому +5

    "Think like an ancient physicist!" Thanks, that's my new motto

  • @thumbstruck
    @thumbstruck 2 роки тому +2

    The early Christians were in a culture that liked to speculate and define things, even when there was no evidence to their speculations.

  • @jasper3706
    @jasper3706 2 роки тому +8

    I just started reading surviving Valentinian texts yesterday! What great timing

  • @survivalizer
    @survivalizer 2 роки тому +2

    Its not fair to say Gnostics were polytheists though. They knew there were "powers" that were subordinate to Christ who was in turn subordinate to God/The One

  • @minasoliman
    @minasoliman 2 роки тому +16

    The fact that Valentinus almost became bishop of Rome is worth making the video about him/his belief system!

  • @brianseiler9750
    @brianseiler9750 2 роки тому +9

    Thanks for this video. I'm personally fascinated by early Christian "heresies" - particularly "gnostic" ones - but I've always wondered one thing. Did this cosmology come from somewhere? It seems awfully complex to have just been conjured from nothing by one or a few authors. I mean, it's not unheard of (see the cosmology of Scientology), but given how much of what you find in Old Testament cosmology you can see as related to other nearby faiths (in some cases preceding all the way back to PIE religion, with things like the construction of Yahweh as a storm god in conflict with Leviathan, in keeping with the Chaoskampf), is there some other "pagan" source from whence the Sethian and Valentenian cosmologies developed? I think I understand some of the Neoplatonic influences, but I can't find any non-Christian belief systems featuring cosmologies similar to the sort of complex structure you see in something like Sethianism.
    Is there any literature that I could read that would shed some light on this particular aspect? I would love to see an actual video to help explain it in ley terms, but if that's not in the cards, are there any scholars who have written on this particular subject?

    • @PaintedHoundie
      @PaintedHoundie 2 роки тому +9

      Gnostic cosmology is a combination of subverted abrahamic systems and greatly inspired by existing greek systems. Lot of platonic concepts. Things like the demiurge, concepts of archons, the pleroma, the Sophia, etc. are from greek beliefs prior to. Some concepts are in the new testament as well, but in terminology, and not in a literal sharing of the same concept. like the pleroma is used in the new testament but not in reference to a realm above the creator god.

    • @ANDROLOMA
      @ANDROLOMA 2 роки тому

      Dr. Ehrman needs your suggestion as another book topic.

    • @jeremyg7261
      @jeremyg7261 2 роки тому

      That guy is a loser

    • @straightupanarg6226
      @straightupanarg6226 2 роки тому +4

      If I'm not mistaken, the idea of "emnations of the divine" (but not the specifics here) begins with Plotinus' interpretation of Plato and continues through the later neoplatonists.

    • @ButSeriouslyThough
      @ButSeriouslyThough 2 роки тому +1

      In part, it simply elaborates on the cosmic pattern found in orthodox Christianity: in orthodox Christianity, Satan is the ruler of this world but God comes in the person of Jesus Christ to reclaim what is His, and the dualistic Gnostic cosmologies simply elaborated on this. In part, it is a sort of Platonic syncretism. And in part, it is, in my opinion, based on legitimate confusion regarding what Paul meant in his epistles; a confusion that lasts even to this day, as you'll see with the disagreements between Protestantism and Catholicism/Orthodoxy on what Paul believed concerning the Law and the relationship between faith and works (although we see from the writings of Clement of Alexandria that the Gnostic vs. Orthodox dispute was rather about faith and knowledge). I mean, it's not hard to read Galatians and see how Paul could have easily been interpreted as having the same kind of cosmology as the Valentinians.

  • @lormanias6395
    @lormanias6395 2 роки тому +3

    What about more about ancient Egypt?
    Ra? Anubis? The Ankh? The Uas? The Djed?

  • @Carlos-ln8fd
    @Carlos-ln8fd 2 роки тому +7

    Such an amazing video. Something that fascinates me about history of religion is how it helps us understand the people who lived in the past, their beliefs, ideas and practices.

  • @HappyHermitt
    @HappyHermitt 2 роки тому +2

    One variety of Gnosticism, yes.

  • @0sireion
    @0sireion 2 роки тому +5

    I love these deep dives. You keep the pace moving at exactly the speed I wish to imbibe it all. This is so helpful in understanding a variety of very disparate philosophies. Thank you.

  • @DYLANANDRE
    @DYLANANDRE 6 місяців тому +6

    The tablet reads “Flavia Sophe, freedwoman of Aurelius Hermia, a woman of modesty and piety, lived 30 years, 7 months, and 20 days. Aurelius Hermia, her former master, and husband made this tomb for her and for himself and for their freedperson.”
    What you wrote was a quote from The Gospel of Phillip. 0:29

  • @theholyschois7477
    @theholyschois7477 2 роки тому +4

    I thought this video was about the imperial dynasty of the late Roman empire lol- Great video as always although I really get confused when Christology starts mentioning concepts such as Gods natures, essence and substance. Like the disputes of chalcedonian and miaphysitism.

  • @EarthShadowFilms
    @EarthShadowFilms Рік тому +1

    Bridal symbolism is all throughout the New Testament so I don’t know why you’d say that’s weird for present day Christians. Even Christians who don’t read the Bible (a lot if not most) love the bridegroom metaphor and you hear it mentioned at like every other wedding.

  • @FrJWF
    @FrJWF 2 роки тому +4

    This is one of the most cogent explanations of Valentinian cosmology/theology I've ever heard. Not an easy thing to tease out to make understandable to a modern audience! Kudos!

  • @mudgetheexpendable
    @mudgetheexpendable 2 роки тому +3

    My hylic self was *riveted* by the TriTrac and all these fascinating details about how very complex the roots of christian religion really is. I appreciate your clarity and erudition.

  • @owenkelly2940
    @owenkelly2940 2 роки тому +4

    I was raised Southern and Independent Baptist. The bridal imagery is still very common among them.

    • @ronaldm.7101
      @ronaldm.7101 2 роки тому

      How is it? With what purpose?

    • @grimble4564
      @grimble4564 2 роки тому +6

      @@ronaldm.7101 It might be similar to how Catholicism still uses this imagery too. The Church is often referred to as the bride of Christ, and so becoming baptized into the Church is supposed to place you in an intimate and binding relationship with God.

  • @gracaendre3092
    @gracaendre3092 2 роки тому +4

    I've been watching so much RFB I think I might be addicted xD
    Please never stop making videos, this is the best channel out there!

  • @imagewell5319
    @imagewell5319 2 роки тому +1

    That’s not right to use Coptic Orthodox Iconagraphy in the clip art for a video about heresy.

  • @bdwon
    @bdwon 2 роки тому +2

    You say that the hylic, psychic, pneumatic categories of human are derived from Paul. Was Paul influenced by Plato's tripartite soul, or the three categories of human, i.e., gold, silver, bronze?

  • @NigelJackson
    @NigelJackson 2 роки тому +1

    'The Angel of Great Counsel' is a title given to Christ in the NT. The Valentinians were originally not distinct from primitive Christianity but rather an inner dimension of esoterism within the early Church with their secret sacramental initiations of Apolytrosis and the Bridal Chamber for the Pneumatic Christians as well as the Psychic Christians. The Valentinian categorization of Pneumatic, Psychic and Hylic types of human is similar to the Divyabhava, Virabhava and Pashubhava in Indian Tantrik traditions.

  • @joelkupiainen6759
    @joelkupiainen6759 2 роки тому +4

    I had the pleasure of attending an introduction to exegetics class taught by Dunderberg and his colleague Juha Pakkala, where Pakkala would teach the Old Testament and Dunderberg the New Testament. He's very inspiring as a lecturer.

  • @ethhein5460
    @ethhein5460 2 роки тому +4

    Thank you so much i love your videos especially on Christian History, Gnosticism, and Apocryphal texts.

  • @glamourweaver
    @glamourweaver 7 місяців тому +1

    The use of the names of the movement teachers to label groups that just called themselves “Christians”, reminds me of how until recently Western Christians referred to Muslims as Muhammedans - and how Muslims reject that label because it implies worship of Muhammad rather than Allah. Calling someone a Marcionite instead of a Christian would imply their religion isn’t actually coming from the True Christ.
    Interesting that in terms of later continuously surviving heterodoxies, Lutherans would end up embracing that variety of label (despite referring to themselves pretty specifically as Evangelicals originally).

  • @kevincason5309
    @kevincason5309 2 роки тому +3

    great content and delivery. I'm wondering if you use similar terms like "myths" when referring to modern or orthodox christianity and how you parse one individuals cosmic conclusions as non-myth compared to anothers.

  • @rickmacgregor9875
    @rickmacgregor9875 2 роки тому +2

    The Wind blows,
    And nobody knows,
    Where it comes from,
    Or where it goes,
    And so it is to those,
    Who are born of Breath.

    • @tikhongilson3770
      @tikhongilson3770 2 місяці тому

      Yes, a gnostic passage in the very-orthodox Gospel of John. That gospel also includes Jesus' saying "God is spirit." That would be a great occasion to mention that he was the incarnate God, but Jesus does not.

  • @fiendmajestic6134
    @fiendmajestic6134 2 роки тому +6

    Fantastic job as always. Thank you for all your hard work!

  • @DYLANANDRE
    @DYLANANDRE 6 місяців тому +4

    That’s not what the tablet says…

  • @theangel666100
    @theangel666100 2 роки тому +1

    I may have misunderstood, but wouldn't all humans be pneumic, as all humans are descendant of Noah ergo Seth ?

  • @christopherdiedrich40
    @christopherdiedrich40 2 роки тому +3

    This video is great!
    I really thought I pneuma faith pretty well, but, this was very enlightening!

  • @edith8359
    @edith8359 2 роки тому +1

    Christians drew from Egyptian mythology.
    Jesus spent his youth in Egypt and the afterlife was central to their core beliefs.
    Along with the judgement needed to pass to eternity.

  • @matthewbittenbender9191
    @matthewbittenbender9191 2 роки тому +1

    Something to add, is that the belief in the demiurge and the aeons, gives rise to the innate divinity of man; that the soul is part of the highest aeon in which it seeks to return if enlightened enough. There's an Elegance in that which I think is a great lesson for humanity even today.