the review is very functional and substantial for someone who isn't an audiophile like me. your explanation is very easy to understand. thank you and keep the good work
Hey Aaron, I would love to see a bigger focus on sound quality when you compare headphones, or when you do reviews individually. It seemed to me that this part is lacking a bit, even though it's the most important when reviewing headphones, isn't it? You could include binaural sound tests (those were great) like you already did or something like this. Even going deeper into this topic would be nice. This for me would make your reviews and comparisons perfect :) Just a note that i wanted to make overall, sending much love ^^
Comments like this really help creators a lot. I'm a creator myself, and reading your comment to Aaron is definitely beneficial. Aaron is lucky to have you as one of his subscribers! Cheers, man!
I always tell him on every video ! We don’t care about the call quality or the stupid gun test !!!! We want to know if the sound is good and the ANC is good…. Period !!! I think he doesn’t talk about sound because he don’t know technicality of sound :(
Thanks will buy one tomorrow , btw it is "The Quick Brown Fox Jumps over the Lazy Sleeping Dog" , as an old telegraphist this is what we were taught :)
Hi Aron, have you tried the Marshall’s call quality when using the included 3.5mm jack? And is it an advisable alternative for xm4 for quality music given that the wh-xm4’s have absolute ANC feature? Thank you in advance if you’re going to read this and share your thoughts. Thank you so much. Been following your Sony’s review since wf-xm3’s. God bless you!
Thanks for the video Aaron. Are you planning to do the Galaxy buds pro anytime soon? Seen dozens of reviews but yours are always most valuable for me! I can't pre order the s21 ultra with the free buds without hearing your opinion first! Thanks legend!
what the hell, i thought for a long time that the marshall major IV mic was total shit because they are on my pair, i sound like a distorted robot when taking calls on them. they have been like this since i purchased them.
Good review but I didn't understand if marshall major iv has aac bluetooth or not because just sbc wrote on the box I hope answer me because I want buy them. Thanks
hey marshall company stop giving new headphones now i ve to switch to iv from major 3 well aaron i want to know what version of bluetooth is in major 3 and it battery capactiy in mah please my sis gift it without box to me and i searched in website and there isnt mentioned these specs i got it 5 months before
Completely incorrect information about Bluetooth codecs. There is very little perceptible difference between SBC and AptX. On the other hand, AAC is better than either of them. I would suggest that everyone wait for the new LC3 codec that comes with Bluetooth 5.2 in the next 6 months.
Does anyone know if they've improved the audio when using the microphone via Bluetooth? With the Major 3 you had to select the lower quality sound device option in windows to use the mic and headset at the same time, which I am guessing is a different codex to get the mic working via Bluetooth?
May I ask how do you test the quality of the microphone using an android phone. I could not find any app that would record from the headphones microphone for me to test it.
if you listen using headphones , Sony is clearer by far . BTW i used Marshall major 4 itself to listen to the audio. It definitely is value for Money !
Maybe those fake once are from Marshall as well just the illigitimate ones or that didn't passed the quality control. To break for the loss sell them as surplus. Maybe thats the reason no effort whatsoever from marshall to counter those.
call quality - maybe. but headphones are mainly about music. and Marshall major IV have one big problem - very intensive highs and NO mids.... and thats the problem, sound is absolutely not real. I think it is not useful.... sorry Marshall
@@user-mn5lg1fg6r The mid anc were discontinued so I preferred to buy the major iv and I love this version. Much better than my old major II👌Watch videos about the differences between real and fake mid anc headphones... I think you should go with major IV or Monitor II.
I tested both Mid and Mid ANC at the same time, bought them at almost the same price, so price wasn't a reason to decline balance. So I could test them side by side and ended up returning the ANC version. Reasons: ANC feature wasn't anything special and I was not going to use it. When turning ANC ON, the sound quality decreased, and when turned OFF the sound quality was very close but still a bit inferior to non ANC Mid version. The carrying case on the Mid ANC was nice to have, but the most important thing on a headphone is sound, and being that they both are almost the same in construction, sound wins here. So I kept the Mid without ANC. I would like to know if anyone has tested both Mid and Major IV side by side.
Why is no one talking about hissing sound of these headphones? I bought them brand new and the background noise is pretty unbearable. Also, every time you skip to a new sond with a nob, it makes a very loud "notification" sound that keeps itself at a high volume even though your volume is set down to a minimum - just imagine falling asleep in a train and suddenly you have to listen to a loud noise of a "skipping song sound".
Marshall headphones are by design flawed. The exposed wires flex too much and cause wire failors. I have had three marshall headphones with one side of the speakers broken. It pisses me off, these are the best sounding headphones to my ears, the m3s sounded shit in comparison, within one year of blissful listening they keep breaking. Dammit.
I've personally already given up on all kinds of wired audio devices since it's just not worth the trouble of them inevitably breaking at some point due to them bending or something breaking internally. This is exactly how my Major 3 lost audio in one ear the same way as with yours. I recommend anything wireless really.
i beg to differ. these headphones arent $50. if ure gonna pay what u would for these headphones, its reasonable to know and approve ALL its features. (stop w the racist remark and get over yourself)
the review is very functional and substantial for someone who isn't an audiophile like me. your explanation is very easy to understand. thank you and keep the good work
Thank you! And thanks for watching!
Hey Aaron, I would love to see a bigger focus on sound quality when you compare headphones, or when you do reviews individually. It seemed to me that this part is lacking a bit, even though it's the most important when reviewing headphones, isn't it? You could include binaural sound tests (those were great) like you already did or something like this. Even going deeper into this topic would be nice. This for me would make your reviews and comparisons perfect :) Just a note that i wanted to make overall, sending much love ^^
Comments like this really help creators a lot. I'm a creator myself, and reading your comment to Aaron is definitely beneficial. Aaron is lucky to have you as one of his subscribers! Cheers, man!
@@gadgetpilipinas thanks mate 🙌
I always tell him on every video ! We don’t care about the call quality or the stupid gun test !!!! We want to know if the sound is good and the ANC is good…. Period !!! I think he doesn’t talk about sound because he don’t know technicality of sound :(
Wow, Marshall gives a very nice phone call quality!
Thanks for all these reviews/comparisons on all these different headphones. It's so hard to choose lol but your videos are helping me out a lot
Very informative! Can't wait to have my Marshall 4 Major BT headphone ❤️
Thank you! Also please subscribe if you havent already! 😁
Wish I could give multiple likes. What a detailed review
Thanks will buy one tomorrow , btw it is "The Quick Brown Fox Jumps over the Lazy Sleeping Dog" , as an old telegraphist this is what we were taught :)
Are you satisfied?
The problem with Marshall headphones are the counterfeit items is scattered all away and we cant identified which one is original.
Ironically even the official ones arent made by marshall but rather a 3rd party.
@@Sir.InfinityTGK by whom?
Hi Aron, have you tried the Marshall’s call quality when using the included 3.5mm jack? And is it an advisable alternative for xm4 for quality music given that the wh-xm4’s have absolute ANC feature? Thank you in advance if you’re going to read this and share your thoughts. Thank you so much. Been following your Sony’s review since wf-xm3’s. God bless you!
Yeah is it?
Nice review, also do the new anker ANC ones.
Really Aaron is one of the best reviewers in UA-cam 😍😍
Thanks for the helpful review!
You’re welcome!
A very helpfull review. Thanks, man!
You're welcome! Please subscribe if you haven't already! 😁
🙂does anyone know compare this one to sony wh-ch720n which one has better sound quality?like less muffled and more clarity of mid and high
Thank you for information, I boughtt this hedadset MM4, wainting for delivery and watching video)))
Thanks for the video Aaron. Are you planning to do the Galaxy buds pro anytime soon? Seen dozens of reviews but yours are always most valuable for me! I can't pre order the s21 ultra with the free buds without hearing your opinion first! Thanks legend!
In the phone call quality test, the Marshall's sounded closer to natural than the Sony's, though the voice stood out more.
Love your reviews. Have you tried the phiaton legacy 900 ?
Super detailed review👍 one question: as iphone doesn't support aptx will there be a significant difference in the sound between major 3 and 4?
Apple has AAC codec, which is the same as aptx, so major's gonna work fine with Apple devices because of supporting this codec
you say these are easily faked... is there a way to tell before you buy? is there a specific retailer (other than marshall themselves) to go to?
Well explained ❤
Thank you 🙂
Very nice review. Thank you.
what the hell, i thought for a long time that the marshall major IV mic was total shit because they are on my pair, i sound like a distorted robot when taking calls on them. they have been like this since i purchased them.
This headphones has better microphone than 90% of headphones out there even better than my airpods pro and pro max crazy
Hi Aaron , please,can you make a video with the difference between the Marshall major 4 genuine and the fake one .
Many thank for you videos
I think i got the fake one
Hi, may I know is it comfortable using the Marshall Major iv with the glasses on? Or does it feel tight wearing it with glasses?
Took a couple of hours to say "okey I need a breath"
Are they good at blocking sound (noise cancelling) I know they aren't ANC but do they still do an ok job?
Is it good to plug into a guitar amp? Looking for best headphones for personal guitar play without waking people up
I was using my marshall major 2 with my audio interface and bias fx software. It was sounding okay.
I stopped when you mentioned that it doesn't support APTX anymore like WTF?
Good review but I didn't understand if marshall major iv has aac bluetooth or not because just sbc wrote on the box I hope answer me because I want buy them. Thanks
Listening to this on my Koss porta pro and Iam thinking About this Marshalls. Is IT good upgrade in sound?
I want to see the graph of the frequency response of Major 4.. I don't understand why they removed it on the box
with the major IV, can you connect to multiple device like most modern headphones?
Yes
hey marshall company stop giving new headphones now i ve to switch to iv from major 3
well aaron i want to know what version of bluetooth is in major 3 and it battery capactiy in mah please my sis gift it without box to me and i searched in website and there isnt mentioned these specs
i got it 5 months before
Aaron please review
Marshall Mode Eq please please 😭😭😭
Completely incorrect information about Bluetooth codecs. There is very little perceptible difference between SBC and AptX. On the other hand, AAC is better than either of them. I would suggest that everyone wait for the new LC3 codec that comes with Bluetooth 5.2 in the next 6 months.
And Galaxy Buds Pro?! Waiting your review!
I'm thinking of getting the beats solo pro or marshall major IV. Which one would you recommend me to buy.
Hi, what type of Headphones did u get?
Does anyone know if they've improved the audio when using the microphone via Bluetooth?
With the Major 3 you had to select the lower quality sound device option in windows to use the mic and headset at the same time, which I am guessing is a different codex to get the mic working via Bluetooth?
Excuse me, doesn't marshall have a noise cancelling ? how can their phone call quality better than sony. Thank you
May I ask how do you test the quality of the microphone using an android phone. I could not find any app that would record from the headphones microphone for me to test it.
Great review
Thanks brother
Hello, do you know why I can't pair them to a Samsung TV?
if you listen using headphones , Sony is clearer by far . BTW i used Marshall major 4 itself to listen to the audio. It definitely is value for Money !
bro marshal is around 10k sony is around 25-30k
Too good presentation 🔥
Thank you so much 😊
so is major 4 really worth it ?
Does your mashall major 3 works until now?
Can I use it for gaming?
Great review! Does the sound quality improve if used wired?
its pretty okay
Can someone drop the link for the Wireless Charging Pad?
Thanks!
It really good than Sony ?May I know.
Judge my vow sphinx of black quartz.
Is that bluetooth headphone?
Maybe those fake once are from Marshall as well just the illigitimate ones or that didn't passed the quality control. To break for the loss sell them as surplus. Maybe thats the reason no effort whatsoever from marshall to counter those.
Do you see any other brand do this, at all?
Marshall or sony?
Can we attend calls without that auxiliary wire ???????
Yeh you can make calls in Bluetooth mode
It does support aac
How is the durability of the headphones?
80 hours
@@ganesaurus a little fragile to me for that price 😂
14:09 👍👍👍 ✋
Bluetooth 4. 2 and Bluetooth 5 are the same thing...
the sound with the audio cable is the same as using wireless? anyone has tried them for playing guitar/bass?
No. Wireless is twice as bad, of course if you are not deaf.
call quality - maybe. but headphones are mainly about music. and Marshall major IV have one big problem - very intensive highs and NO mids.... and thats the problem, sound is absolutely not real. I think it is not useful.... sorry Marshall
Major IV and Mid ANC cost almost the same.. which one should i choose??????
Which did you buy in the end?
@@user-mn5lg1fg6r The mid anc were discontinued so I preferred to buy the major iv and I love this version. Much better than my old major II👌Watch videos about the differences between real and fake mid anc headphones... I think you should go with major IV or Monitor II.
I tested both Mid and Mid ANC at the same time, bought them at almost the same price, so price wasn't a reason to decline balance. So I could test them side by side and ended up returning the ANC version. Reasons: ANC feature wasn't anything special and I was not going to use it. When turning ANC ON, the sound quality decreased, and when turned OFF the sound quality was very close but still a bit inferior to non ANC Mid version. The carrying case on the Mid ANC was nice to have, but the most important thing on a headphone is sound, and being that they both are almost the same in construction, sound wins here. So I kept the Mid without ANC. I would like to know if anyone has tested both Mid and Major IV side by side.
Only SBC codec?!? Wtf?!
Why is no one talking about hissing sound of these headphones? I bought them brand new and the background noise is pretty unbearable. Also, every time you skip to a new sond with a nob, it makes a very loud "notification" sound that keeps itself at a high volume even though your volume is set down to a minimum - just imagine falling asleep in a train and suddenly you have to listen to a loud noise of a "skipping song sound".
A lo mejor tu equipo no es original y te vendieron el falso 🤔
You sure you don’t have Fakes?????
Original have aptx
Shame they don't have noise cancelling
Stay classic bro
Why did Marshall not build in ANC in those?
They want you to spend more by buying their more expensive over ear anc headphone.
@@leemanwrong it would be Mid ANC, that is the same type as Major IV.
First
До свидания
Marshall headphones are by design flawed. The exposed wires flex too much and cause wire failors. I have had three marshall headphones with one side of the speakers broken. It pisses me off, these are the best sounding headphones to my ears, the m3s sounded shit in comparison, within one year of blissful listening they keep breaking. Dammit.
I've personally already given up on all kinds of wired audio devices since it's just not worth the trouble of them inevitably breaking at some point due to them bending or something breaking internally. This is exactly how my Major 3 lost audio in one ear the same way as with yours. I recommend anything wireless really.
You should get in ear monitor with removal cables.
Please , chinese guy, stop comparing noise cancelation , calls and other bullshit... Headphones are about the music.
i beg to differ. these headphones arent $50. if ure gonna pay what u would for these headphones, its reasonable to know and approve ALL its features. (stop w the racist remark and get over yourself)