love the fact that you give us a non-biased technical comparison without it being heavily opinionated. A lot of the other reviewers mix too much of their own opinions into the comparisons. Liked and subscribed!
You are amazing :D with quality and detail on your reviews... I feel sad for those who give you thumbs DOWN.. Ignore them please and keep it up... we all are watching you :)
Great review! Straight to the point with no unnecessary fuss here and there. Your videos are so enjoyable and, as a non-native speaker of English, I always find in your clear pronunciation and spotless grammar such an excellent way to practice listening while learning about the latest in the world of the hobby i just love, photography. A zillion thanks from Paraguay!
Thanks, I appreciate your kind words - and you have identified the essence of my intention on this channel. And by the way, English is not my first language either. Please say hello to all my friends in Paraguay.
Good one! found this after 3 days of searching. a small question.. please suggest. our main is to shoot in 1080p ( weddings ) , which camera is better or does not give same quality?? asking this because you mentioned there would be pixel binding for 4k in z7.. what about 1080 p for z6 and z7
Nice down-to-earth review and comparison. Just bought a Z6 to compliment the Z7 I've had for a bit over a year now, because some of the most interesting photographic subjects come out when it's nearly dark, so I'm looking forward to seeing how much further I can push it in low light...
Hey great video as always. How quick is the image review playback in the view finder? If I press the image review button I’m curious how long I might wait to see the image in seconds/half seconds. Thanks!
Hi, just found your reviews, thanks very informative. I do varied photography and some commercial work. I have a D850 which is great, but want to have the benefit of mirrorless with a second body, thinking the Z6 would be best as a better low light alternative, or would i be better with Z7 similar to what I am used too ?, are the lower light benefits that significant ?
It was a pleasure to read your kind words, thanks. While there is lots to like about the Z6 (particularly for video), the Z7 will be a better match for the images you're creating with the D850. Hope this helps.
Hi Maarten, love the review. Very good indeed. I am someone who mainly likes to shoot people, Portraits and events like weddings, and also get out to the coast for landscapes. Will the Z6 be good enough for my usage? I will be charging for my event and portraiture. Thanks
Thank you that helped a lot. I've never had so much trouble in deciding which camera to Purchase. I try to hold on to cameras for quite a while so my decision is important. Being bouncing around the Nikon D850(new), Leica SL (Used), & now the the Z series. Recently been informed that I would be able to use my Leica M lenses with an adapter on the Z camera. Now that is exciting. Now which one to choose the Z6 Vs. Z7 🤔
@@MaartenHeilbron ~ With the Z7 I feel like I would future proof myself, for quite some time. Thinking about making big prints. Would like disease Z7 to perform double duty street photography, studio stilllife. I am sure that Z6 would be not quite as good but very close. Please don't hesitate to tell me. You have a deep knowledge of photography And it would be greatly appreciate of any advice.
Hi Maarrten Always enjoy your reviews ,the clarity of presentation is a pleasure to listen toand watch I have a couple of questions for you Would you say that mirrorless cameras are superior in terms of image quality? Taking on the new system would be a huge step for me I have a large collection of Nikon manual prime lenses pre Ai,Ai and AF How do legacy Nikon lenses work/perform with the Z6 and adapter? Are the new lenses very much better interms of optics than the Zfit lenses Thanks for your time in answering these perhaps simple questions but they are important ones for me and perhaps many others thinking of moving on to mirrorless system .
Thanks for the kind words. There is nothing about the design of mirrorless cameras that would effect the quality of the image - as long as the sensor size is the same and the quality of the lens is equivalent. I did try the adapter and found it worked well, but it's still an adapter and there are some compromises. I have not compared the lenses directly, maybe there are other online sources that have. In my view, they are the equivalent of Nikon's better lenses - substantially better than the "kit" lenses. Hope this helps.
Hi Maarten, first and foremost thank you very much for your comparison video and all the information! Yet I have one unanswered question in mind, which was neither answered in your video nor through help of google search. Due to the smaller resolution and identical sensor size, the ISO performance of the Z6 is always described as slightly less noisy in comparison to the Z7. Therefore I suppose for low light and night shots I should rather get myself a Z6? Yet I am asking myself, what if you use the Z7 with the 24 MP setting instead of the 45 MP. Does this mean it would show similar ISO / low light performance compared to the Z6? Or would the Z7 24 MP images nonetheless be recorded in 45 MP first and just be downscaled to 24 MP? I would appreciate very much if you know the answer! Cheers Michael
When there are fewer pixels on a larger sensor (like the Z6) the pixels are larger, enabling them to capture more light, resulting in a less noisy image in low light situations. Using the APS-C mode on the Z7 would not increase the size of the pixels, nor reduce the amount of noise.
Very nice comparison, I am switching to nikon but confused between z7 and z6, currently I own sony a7r4 but it has lot of iso noise even using with good glass I cant push my iso above 800 and at 1600 images are pretty unusable. Us that the case wit z7 also?. Or should I go to z6 route. I am amateur and currently not into pro photography but in future looking to get into event photography. Kindly reply. Thanks in advance.
@@MaartenHeilbron I understand, even 6400 iso is ok when u r not cropping. But when u crop then u zoom in the photo and hence all the artifacts will come out. I see on sony a7r4 page all the people use denoise to make thre photo usable.
Looking at getting a Z6 or Z7 - shoot a bit of Street photography but mostly landscape and astroscape photography. I know thay the z7 smaller pixels may mean more noise at higher ISO but how bad is the difference? Is that something that is neglible after a tweak in lightroom? And how use able are they ISOs? I am moving from a D600 where 3200 is top end of useable limit anyway so I'm guessing both cameras will perform will enough at night at 6400/12800 not.to cause alarm? If that is the case, then the Z7 right? Appreciate its a mix of rambling commentary and question but would appreciate some feedback :) great video!
I really hate to judge ISO noise on your behalf, my observation is that it's very personal and subjective. However, I find those settings - 6400 and 12,800 to be very acceptable. Watch my full reviews for more details. ua-cam.com/video/DpG4XFNgat8/v-deo.html.
Nice review, very efficient and clear. One question; what is the lowest iso setting for video on the Z6? I have the D750 and for video the lowest is 100, but for photos it can do down to another 1.3 stops. Thank you.
Nice review Maarten, Thank you. Can I ask, why do you review so few Canons? I look through your video list and see many Fuji, Sony, and Nikon, the occasional Panasonic and Olympus but very few Canon. As they sell so many around the world and have recently climbed back to the top of Japans sales charts I wondered if there was a reason? All the best.
Thanks. There are two reasons. First, changes in personnel and polices at Canon Canada are making it difficult/impossible to loan a camera (revenue from this channel does not allow me to purchase the cameras I'd like to review). I keep trying, but I rarely get a reply or a returned call. Secondly, my viewers are not as interested. In order of brand popularity for my reviews, I would say Nikon, Fuji and Sony - they get a lot of interest and plays, the others less so. That said, I'm not giving up on Canon, or other brands that are difficult to arrange loans. I've finally been able to establish a good contact at Pentax. I hope this answers your question.
Maarten, thank you so much for this valuable comparison. Always the best and most objective on the net. I have a tangential question I hope you can answer for me. Has there been a firmware update for the Z6? I've searched but haven't found any links to-date. I know the z7 has updated firmware, but I'm not clear that's also true for the z6.
Sad to say, for video folk like my self it's not much of an update. Lots of things need to be done to make video shooting easier and yield a better result. Most of them require only simple firmware upgrades. I outline most in my Z6 video...nothing close to Maarten's complete and concise presentations, but I still believe the points I make are pertinent and ought to be seriously considered. No asking for the moon, just many of the things Nikon's competitors have done for several years now---often in very inexpensive cameras like the G85, G7, or A6500.@@MaartenHeilbron
Hi Maarten, quick advice would be appreciated. Going to Venice for a 4 day trip. I have Z6 + 24-70 F4 + 50mm Z-mount lenses and Fujifilm X-T3 with almost all the Fujinon lenses. May be 18-55 + 10-24 + 50-140 lenses. Which would you take?
I would take the Z6 with the 24-70 if my goal was mostly stills, but if video is part of your intent I would take the X-T3 with the 15-55, and a longer lens, if your subject matter warrants.
Thank you for this great review and providing very useful content. I currently have a D500 and would like to add a full frame for my weddings and portrait photography but I am stuck on which one to purchase between the D850, Z6 or Z7. Which would you recommend?
Thanks for your kind words. What benefits do you see in a full frame camera? What aspect of the D500 is failing you? In your place, I'm not sure I would make the change.
Hi Maarten I am a d810 shooter but changing to mirror less and the Z6 one question is it worth investing in the 24-70 2.8 or have the kit F4 the reason why I ask is that I had the old 24-70 and 17-28 and changed them for 20,24 and 85 primes as the image quality / sharpness was on another level. However it seems that folks are saying that the 24-70 2.8 is the same as having 24,35,50 primes the IQ is that good. I shoot street landscape,events and portrait. The reviews are great and when I get one I can use your ‘tutorials’ to set it up and use the fab features. Thank you
I did not have the opportunity to compare them side by side, they seem to be about the same quality, but I suggest you look to dxomark or dpreview for a more authoritative result.
I'm not much of a fan of adapters. It does seem to work well in a limited amount of testing I did, but you're best to look to another reviewer. As for eye autofocus, until Nikon implements that for the Z6/7 twins, it doesn't work with any lens.
Compared to D850 which one you like more? Is the electronic viewfinder worth to upgrade? Is for portraits better with the new eye detect autofocus z6 vs D850 considering that in D850 I always waist time with focus and recompose?
They're both very good cameras. The factors that you mention, if they are important to you, would swing me to the Z7, which, with the recent EyeAF upgrade is an excellent choice.
I have the Z50. I love it. WTS, I’m considering the FF versions. If I got the Z7 it seems I could use it in Crop mode and have close resolution to the Z50. Heck, I think I could use the Z DX 16-50 pancake on the Z7 for an in-pocket walk around camera. Is this accurate?
@@MaartenHeilbron I have the Z 35 1.8. I thought the 16-50 would make a good walk around lens while still being in 20MP range. Would make less sense on Z6.
Hey Maarten, thanks for your superb and helpfull videos!!! Could you help me with this one issue I have with my z6: on my other nikon dslr , I shoot RAW on one Card and jpeg on my second card. On my z6 I do the same, but as it only has one card, when I put the xqd card on my computer I only get to see my raw files? Is something wrong in my settings???
@@MaartenHeilbron Sorry, I didn't make myself clear: what I meant was that on my Nikon D850 I have my settings so that the Raw file goes to the XQD card and at the same time the JPEG goes to the SD card. That is easy, depending on what I want to import I choose the corresponding card. As the Z6 only has one XQD card only and I still have my camera set to shoot RAW + JPEG I would expect to find two images on my one card: one in Raw and one in JPEG. The thing is when I put my card in my computer , lightroom only shows the RAW files and not the JPEG files...
Ah ... the problem is with your Lightroom settings. The first preferences tab has a setting "treat JPEG files next to RAW files as separate images". If you turn that on, you'll see both. Or just look at the files on the card.
I think that sports photographers will want a faster burst, better follow focus and a larger lens selection, as those features are available elsewhere.
Maarten Heilbron That’s my opinion too. The Z serie is not ready for any kind of action photography because of the fast focusing problems. Maybe in the future ...
quick question that might not be too relevant, but would i be able to print good/high quality A2 prints with the z6? I'm on the fence as to which of the two to get, but i do like the better low-light capabilities of the Z6. So if i can get good quality prints up to A2 with the Z6, It would be my choice given the price as well. Any thoughts?
My understanding of the 200 frame burst limit is intended to keep the camera from filling your card and draining the battery should the camera be put away and some object shift to hold down the shutter release while in storage.
I've heard that excuse before - but this rationale assumes that 1) you put your camera away when it's on and 2) that you don't use a camera bag, but some other that may jeopardize the camera - not just by pushing the shutter. While I appreciate your note, please remember that no other camera manufacturer feels the need to put a limit. And if you feel it's necessary, why not an option for those of us who don't? It's a needless aggravation in my book.
Curious how you think both compare in regard to the D850. I trying to decide between the Z6, D850 and Sony A7Riii. I'm into landscapes, low-light concerts, astrophotgraphy, sports and the occasional portrait. Would like good video, but not the most important aspect.
I do have a question. Critics make a lot of the banding issue on the Z cameras, pointing out that raising the shadows too much causes banding, due to the presence of the on chip phase detection. Do you think it makes sense then, in extreme dynamic range situations, to minimize this by pushing exposure more to the right, and dealing with the highlights later in post? Obviously there are limits to this, but I've never seen this issue addressed, as far as techniques to mitigate the problem. (Not that I see it as a big problem myself.)
I did not explore this issue. In my opinion these are edge cases that are exaggerated by those who feel the need to exploit their audience. In my judgement, while I'm sure it's an effect that can be provoked, it's not one that's typically encountered in real-life situations. However, your thought that exposing to the right, even if it includes some overexposed highlights is a reasonable approach, I found that there was more detail than was evident in both highlights and shadows that could be exploited in RAW files. One issue here is that the dynamic range capability of the LCD and viewfinder is limited and not always representative of a final image. In camera, the histogram is your best judge of exposure.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thanks, that's an interesting point about the LCDs, I haven't heard anybody else address. I'll keep that in mind. It takes some discipline to keep an eye on that histogram. (I used to shoot 4x5 so I don't have any excuse for spraying and praying.) I agree, a 5 stop increase in post would be a very rare circumstance. I bring up the ETR issue becasue I also shoot m-four-thirds, where it is advocated as a standard strategy for dealing with shadow noise. It's almost getting funny now. The image quality in all high end cameras is getting so good, many reviewers are grasping at straws to find things to criticise. Shooting at iso 50,000 and bumping the shadows up 5 stops...really? And this underlying tone of competitiveness and downright animosity between advocates of various systems and cameras is getting tiresome. I said something nice about Olympus one day and somebody practically attacked my mother. Maybe it's as you suggest, and is largely about clicks. UA-cam is still a great resource for learning, but I'm starting to get a bit annoyed and also suspicious about motives at times. I must say that the tone of your reviews and tutorials restores my faith somewhat.
@@jonbarnard7186 Grasping at straws is a good way to describe the continuous attempt to find a topic for today's post. And I do appreciate your kind words, but will admit that providing honest and competent material is hard work and not widely appreciated.
@@MaartenHeilbron I recently received the reply from Nikon "z7 is the best for video". Confused between 2 different opinions. I would appreciate if you can compare the boys specifically for video outcome. A humble request from your fan and follower.
Hi Maarten, new subscriber here. Truly loved your honest review however it didn't touch my interest. I can see these specs for my self anywhere however I like how you indulge in the specifics of tech. What I came to your channel for wasn't to hear about the similarities of features and spec but how well they hold up to each other with video. I would truly be interested in your review of how each model hold up to video capabilities with a sizable comparison. I ask this for my basic understanding that lower MP typically delivers better low light and binding video content. How would the two cameras match up for someone like me who has a lot of money in the Nikon ecosystem looking for a "hybrid" upgrade solution? Btw I shoot with a D750 and want better MP for stills but also better video capabilities. I'm swinging the axe on to rather trade up my current body or simply dive into another system for strictly video that won't support my current investment. The obvious is that the Z6 compared to my D750 would be similar in stills but taking the stride in video. So my head is why not keep my D750 for stills (that has done wonders for me in terms of selling great images) and purchasing something like a GH5 for stricly video? Or is the Z7 my solution to a "Hybrid" need? I would appriciate your opinion and hope to see more great content in the future.
Thanks for the kind words, they are appreciated. I think you've identified the differences (and really, there are more similarities) for video - mainly the sensor resolution. And I feel that you're right, the smaller resolution (particularly for video, after all 4K is only 8Mp). I feel that doing quality comparisons is not really my forté, but as I do have them both for a few more weeks, I'll see what I can manage. Just not sure what appropriate or useful subjects might be. I think you're right - unless there is some other aspect of mirrorless that appeals to you, the D750 is still a camera that will provide excellent and comparable stills. The Z7 does provide a good hybrid solution - but in 2019, most competitive cameras (Sony for full frame, Fujifilm for APS-C, Pansonic for micro four thirds) offer more.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thank you very much for your prompt response. I'm not asking anything out side your "scope". I'm curious to your tech side observation. I'm happy with my D750, however the world is turning to 4k video feed and the body simply can't keep up. If possible during your possession of both cameras your review would be quite interesting for video. I can't imagine there's not others like me looking to continue down the Nikon ecosystem that would not only benefit the collection but the wallet as well. I hope you take this as possible review for consideration since no one I follow seems to care about the video aspects of the either bodies. I think there's much more to offer than what's being put on to the internet. There's a lot to consider as a "camera" investment for most. Especially since the tech has been decades behind its self. I think we're all wondering what's the next "big" thing and where to put our money in. Cheers, Kirk
Maarten thanks for your review, I have currently a Z6 and a very good D750, but I started to move into the z line of lenses, they are great, I'm only remaining the 85 1.8 g and the 70-200 2.8 vr ii, the rest I Invested in z mount glass. So now the D750 doesn't have much use, I'm thinking to change it for other camera in the z system, something that complements and could be back up for one to another, but I don't know if the z7 apart from the hi res sensor for landscape can justify the price, or if other z6 could be the one but just live with medium size sensor for landscape but great for video an low light, or even I thought that a z50 could be just a cheap backup camera, great for video, all in the same system, easy to carry. I do landscape, architect, portrait photography and I moved heavy into video, also I'm a former wedding photographer. I really want to be in only one system, But I don't know if the z7 will justify the price, or if the z50 could be good enough in a pro environment? What could be your advise?
Always nice to know my work is appreciated. Yes, those are very nice lenses - that really make the Nikon mirrorless system work the investment. It's a tough call, but one you'll have to make. If money was no object, I'd take the Z7, as it really appreciates those lenses - but getting clear and crisp images requires a little more attention to craft and detail. For really sharp work I'm using a tripod and a shutter delay.
@@MaartenHeilbron glad to share that I finally have my z7 with me, my main photography camera now making combo with my z6, my main video camera, I'm so happy z system is an other world!
If only a dual UHS-II version exists of the Z camera... Hope they do it with different card configurations like on D5. No needing to re invent a new camera, space can be found removing xqd slot, then just release as it is because they re almost all around and great mirrorless 🤔 pro functionality and cheaper cards in a single move. What do you think? 🤓
Interesting. My first request would be to have both video data rates and burst speeds that actually take advantage of the speed capability of XQD. What advantages would you see in dual SD cards?
@@MaartenHeilbron backup and less cost. Burst speed seems to be the physical limit of the camera, because even with xqd cannot go faster expecially on afc even maybe is a software and processing limitation, new function which slow down the process of tracking 🙂 but at this point uhs ii is enough at least for me
The Z6ii will be $2000 the Z7ii $3000. The only difference I can determine is that the sensor costs $1000 more. Based on your testing of both, is the z7 ii worth the price difference??
Hi Maarten. Thanks for this comparison. I would like to have your advices. indeed, i have a D750 and i want to switch to Z6 ou Z7. I am doing lots of landscapes and portraits. Do you advice me to choose the 7 or 6 ? Thanks
Would love to know why there’s $1,800 price difference. Maybe simply because there can be. The sensor would surely not add more than a few hundred dollars.
I have been shooting with my D700 since 2012, and am looking to step up to Z6 or Z7 (keeping my D700 as my second body as it is still solid good) Usually I shoot more portraits/wedding events under available light/low light. Have not decided which to get yet, but this video has help contribute infos between comparing the two cams. Thanks.
It is a question of supply and demand, as well as Nikon's need to generate enough revenue so that they can continue to be in business, hire and pay their employees a fair wage so they don't take a job with the competition, and satisfy their shareholders.
The lower resolution sensor allows the Z6 to capture oversampled 4K video, something that the Z7 can only do in Super 35/DX-crop mode. If you can survive on 24 Megapixels for stills, the Z6 could prove to be the better of the two cameras in terms of video quality..
Would love to have either the Z6 or Z7 since I am a longtime Nikon shooter. But I can't. Because all the Nikon lenses that I have are D series or even older. But they don't autofocus in the Zs! (They work excellently in my Nikon DSLR though). Luckily I also have Canon gear. So I am going to buy the rumoured Canon EOS RP.
Yes, my D lenses won't autofocus on Canon cameras, but I have Canon EF lenses. Old, off a Canon 5D (original), but still work pretty well. Nikon's loss is Canon's gain. However I wish it was the other way round. I like the Z6 more than the EOS R, because of IBIS and weather-sealing.
Z 6 for me I love movies that have night scenes with those light lit in the background sexy scenes of woman in a club at night night photography is dope. And it’s cheaper come on z6 I’ll have my paws on you in a couple months
@@MaartenHeilbron crappy autofocus and no AF-C, these cameras are not for wildlife/sports photography, for stills yes, and for video. For what the Z line can do, it can be done with cheaper alternatives, the D750 can give you the same results for a fraction of the cost, and the D850 leaves the Z7 in the dust, the only thing the new Z line has going for it is the video features, which is real good and a step in the right direction for Nikon, once they address the shortcomings I mentioned, then I will gladly give them some of my money.
best camera reviewer! i always feel happy when i hear those guitar strings!
How kind of you to say! A pleasure to read your comments.
Isn't that a harp?
It's a simple guitar strum, performed by Tom Hanley.
love the fact that you give us a non-biased technical comparison without it being heavily opinionated. A lot of the other reviewers mix too much of their own opinions into the comparisons. Liked and subscribed!
Thank you for your kind words, they are appreciated. I do try to be both honest and detailed.
One of the best photography channels on youtube! You are fantastic. Best Regards from Canada - Chris
Wow, thank you! A pleasure to read your kind words.
Great review.
I've been loving my Z6.
I don't have a Z7 to compare it against, so I really appreciated this one.
Thanks, always glad to hear my content is useful.
One of the best and most practical comparisons I've seen. Thanks.
Always nice to hear that I've provided useful videos, thanks for the kind words.
You are amazing :D with quality and detail on your reviews... I feel sad for those who give you thumbs DOWN.. Ignore them please and keep it up... we all are watching you :)
Thank you so much! It was a pleasure to read your kind words.
Great review! Straight to the point with no unnecessary fuss here and there. Your videos are so enjoyable and, as a non-native speaker of English, I always find in your clear pronunciation and spotless grammar such an excellent way to practice listening while learning about the latest in the world of the hobby i just love, photography. A zillion thanks from Paraguay!
Thanks, I appreciate your kind words - and you have identified the essence of my intention on this channel. And by the way, English is not my first language either. Please say hello to all my friends in Paraguay.
Your narrative style is a cool mix between NatGeo Documentary Host and NPR Correspondant. I enjoy it quite much. 🤔
Thank for your very generous compliment, appreciated.
I watched many videos about z6 vs z7 but this information is diff. from others and these informations are very imp. and good ..
Thankss.
So glad to hear you enjoyed the video, thanks!
Some of the best photography tutorials. Always clear and impartial.
A pleasure to read your kind words, thanks!
Great review! All reviews should be like yours!
That's what I'm hoping for. Thanks for your kind words.
Good one! found this after 3 days of searching. a small question.. please suggest.
our main is to shoot in 1080p ( weddings ) , which camera is better or does not give same quality??
asking this because you mentioned there would be pixel binding for 4k in z7.. what about 1080 p for z6 and z7
I would suggest that the Z6 is your better choice for video.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thanks alot for your valuable suggestion!
@@IDHAYAMTV Always happy to help.
Nice down-to-earth review and comparison. Just bought a Z6 to compliment the Z7 I've had for a bit over a year now, because some of the most interesting photographic subjects come out when it's nearly dark, so I'm looking forward to seeing how much further I can push it in low light...
Thanks for sharing, always appreciate hearing from a photographer who's found a kit that pleases.
Great work, thank you for doing this.
Love your style, really clear to the point, subbed!
What a pleasure to hear from a viewer who enjoys my work and appreciates my style. Thanks for the kind words.
Good Review, helps a lot to make a buying decision. Kudos.
Always nice to hear from a viewer who finds my videos useful. Thanks for the kind words.
Thanks for comparison and reviews. Almost ready to pull trigger from D750 to Z7.
Thanks, kind words are always read with pleasure.
Great comparison...keep up the great work!! I am leaning towards the Z7.
Thank you, I appreciate the kind words.
Hey great video as always. How quick is the image review playback in the view finder? If I press the image review button I’m curious how long I might wait to see the image in seconds/half seconds. Thanks!
Thanks, yes, not so fast. It's probably a second - enough to make it noticeable as it switches to playback and then back to live.
Another excellent video Sir!
Now just waiting for detailed A7rIII vs Z7 video from you :)
Always pleased to read your kind words, I'll do my best :-)
Hi, just found your reviews, thanks very informative. I do varied photography and some commercial work. I have a D850 which is great, but want to have the benefit of mirrorless with a second body, thinking the Z6 would be best as a better low light alternative, or would i be better with Z7 similar to what I am used too ?, are the lower light benefits that significant ?
It was a pleasure to read your kind words, thanks. While there is lots to like about the Z6 (particularly for video), the Z7 will be a better match for the images you're creating with the D850. Hope this helps.
Excellent review.
Thank you kindly!!!
great comparison/review
I appreciate your kind words, thanks for taking the time.
Hi Maarten, love the review. Very good indeed. I am someone who mainly likes to shoot people, Portraits and events like weddings, and also get out to the coast for landscapes. Will the Z6 be good enough for my usage? I will be charging for my event and portraiture. Thanks
Absolutely. I have no hesitation recommending the Z6 for nearly all purposes (it's not great for video). Thanks for the kind words.
Thank you that helped a lot. I've never had so much trouble in deciding which camera to Purchase. I try to hold on to cameras for quite a while so my decision is important. Being bouncing around the Nikon D850(new), Leica SL (Used), & now the the Z series. Recently been informed that I would be able to use my Leica M lenses with an adapter on the Z camera. Now that is exciting. Now which one to choose the Z6 Vs. Z7 🤔
Thanks for the kind words. I would suggest that if you're not inexorably drawn to the Z7, that the Z6 is an excellent camera.
@@MaartenHeilbron ~ With the Z7 I feel like I would future proof myself, for quite some time. Thinking about making big prints. Would like disease Z7 to perform double duty street photography, studio stilllife. I am sure that Z6 would be not quite as good but very close. Please don't hesitate to tell me. You have a deep knowledge of photography And it would be greatly appreciate of any advice.
@@rvbsoundfactory Seems like a good choice to me.
Hi Marteen. Great review. Would you say the Z6 is better suited for video than the Z7? Thanks for your feedback.
Thanks for the kind words. Yes, I would agree. If video is your primary use, then the Z6 is the better choice.
Hi Maarrten
Always enjoy your reviews ,the clarity of presentation is a pleasure to listen toand watch
I have a couple of questions for you
Would you say that mirrorless cameras are superior in terms of image quality?
Taking on the new system would be a huge step for me
I have a large collection of Nikon manual prime lenses pre Ai,Ai and AF
How do legacy Nikon lenses work/perform with the Z6 and adapter?
Are the new lenses very much better interms of optics than the Zfit lenses
Thanks for your time in answering these perhaps simple questions but they are important ones for me and perhaps many others thinking of moving on to mirrorless system
.
Thanks for the kind words. There is nothing about the design of mirrorless cameras that would effect the quality of the image - as long as the sensor size is the same and the quality of the lens is equivalent. I did try the adapter and found it worked well, but it's still an adapter and there are some compromises. I have not compared the lenses directly, maybe there are other online sources that have. In my view, they are the equivalent of Nikon's better lenses - substantially better than the "kit" lenses.
Hope this helps.
Hi Maarten, first and foremost thank you very much for your comparison video and all the information! Yet I have one unanswered question in mind, which was neither answered in your video nor through help of google search. Due to the smaller resolution and identical sensor size, the ISO performance of the Z6 is always described as slightly less noisy in comparison to the Z7. Therefore I suppose for low light and night shots I should rather get myself a Z6? Yet I am asking myself, what if you use the Z7 with the 24 MP setting instead of the 45 MP. Does this mean it would show similar ISO / low light performance compared to the Z6? Or would the Z7 24 MP images nonetheless be recorded in 45 MP first and just be downscaled to 24 MP? I would appreciate very much if you know the answer! Cheers Michael
When there are fewer pixels on a larger sensor (like the Z6) the pixels are larger, enabling them to capture more light, resulting in a less noisy image in low light situations. Using the APS-C mode on the Z7 would not increase the size of the pixels, nor reduce the amount of noise.
Brilliant full of the facts only. Showing it is not worth paying the extra for the Z7. Best regards.
Always nice to know that my videos are helpful, thanks for your kind words.
Very nice comparison, I am switching to nikon but confused between z7 and z6, currently I own sony a7r4 but it has lot of iso noise even using with good glass I cant push my iso above 800 and at 1600 images are pretty unusable. Us that the case wit z7 also?. Or should I go to z6 route. I am amateur and currently not into pro photography but in future looking to get into event photography. Kindly reply. Thanks in advance.
I found the A7R4 usable to ISO 6400, so likely am not the best person to ask. dpreview usually provides good detailed samples on ISO.
@@MaartenHeilbron I understand, even 6400 iso is ok when u r not cropping. But when u crop then u zoom in the photo and hence all the artifacts will come out. I see on sony a7r4 page all the people use denoise to make thre photo usable.
@@anoopchaudhary8732 As I said, I leave this decision to you.
@@MaartenHeilbron ok. Thanks for your help and time
Looking at getting a Z6 or Z7 - shoot a bit of Street photography but mostly landscape and astroscape photography. I know thay the z7 smaller pixels may mean more noise at higher ISO but how bad is the difference? Is that something that is neglible after a tweak in lightroom? And how use able are they ISOs? I am moving from a D600 where 3200 is top end of useable limit anyway so I'm guessing both cameras will perform will enough at night at 6400/12800 not.to cause alarm?
If that is the case, then the Z7 right?
Appreciate its a mix of rambling commentary and question but would appreciate some feedback :) great video!
I really hate to judge ISO noise on your behalf, my observation is that it's very personal and subjective. However, I find those settings - 6400 and 12,800 to be very acceptable. Watch my full reviews for more details. ua-cam.com/video/DpG4XFNgat8/v-deo.html.
Nice review, very efficient and clear. One question; what is the lowest iso setting for video on the Z6? I have the D750 and for video the lowest is 100, but for photos it can do down to another 1.3 stops. Thank you.
It is 100, the extended settings can't be used in video mode.
Nice review Maarten, Thank you. Can I ask, why do you review so few Canons? I look through your video list and see many Fuji, Sony, and Nikon, the occasional Panasonic and Olympus but very few Canon. As they sell so many around the world and have recently climbed back to the top of Japans sales charts I wondered if there was a reason? All the best.
Thanks. There are two reasons. First, changes in personnel and polices at Canon Canada are making it difficult/impossible to loan a camera (revenue from this channel does not allow me to purchase the cameras I'd like to review). I keep trying, but I rarely get a reply or a returned call. Secondly, my viewers are not as interested. In order of brand popularity for my reviews, I would say Nikon, Fuji and Sony - they get a lot of interest and plays, the others less so.
That said, I'm not giving up on Canon, or other brands that are difficult to arrange loans. I've finally been able to establish a good contact at Pentax.
I hope this answers your question.
Maarten, thank you so much for this valuable comparison. Always the best and most objective on the net. I have a tangential question I hope you can answer for me. Has there been a firmware update for the Z6? I've searched but haven't found any links to-date. I know the z7 has updated firmware, but I'm not clear that's also true for the z6.
several minor updates to the Z6 were just released today.
Thanks, Maarten. But what I actually asked was if there was a Z6 firmware update. I understand none has been offered at this point.@@MaartenHeilbron
An update was released this morning.
khfishn - thanks, just found the update myself.
Sad to say, for video folk like my self it's not much of an update. Lots of things need to be done to make video shooting easier and yield a better result. Most of them require only simple firmware upgrades. I outline most in my Z6 video...nothing close to Maarten's complete and concise presentations, but I still believe the points I make are pertinent and ought to be seriously considered. No asking for the moon, just many of the things Nikon's competitors have done for several years now---often in very inexpensive cameras like the G85, G7, or A6500.@@MaartenHeilbron
Hi Maarten, quick advice would be appreciated. Going to Venice for a 4 day trip. I have Z6 + 24-70 F4 + 50mm Z-mount lenses and Fujifilm X-T3 with almost all the Fujinon lenses. May be 18-55 + 10-24 + 50-140 lenses. Which would you take?
I would take the Z6 with the 24-70 if my goal was mostly stills, but if video is part of your intent I would take the X-T3 with the 15-55, and a longer lens, if your subject matter warrants.
Thank you for this great review and providing very useful content. I currently have a D500 and would like to add a full frame for my weddings and portrait photography but I am stuck on which one to purchase between the D850, Z6 or Z7. Which would you recommend?
Thanks for your kind words. What benefits do you see in a full frame camera? What aspect of the D500 is failing you? In your place, I'm not sure I would make the change.
HI Maarten, as always great review. Ignore the 7 "thumbs down". I have no idea what they were thinking.
Thanks, I'm thankful for your kind words. Maybe they just didn't like it. Some people don't like apple pie.
Hi Maarten I am a d810 shooter but changing to mirror less and the Z6 one question is it worth investing in the 24-70 2.8 or have the kit F4 the reason why I ask is that I had the old 24-70 and 17-28 and changed them for 20,24 and 85 primes as the image quality / sharpness was on another level. However it seems that folks are saying that the 24-70 2.8 is the same as having 24,35,50 primes the IQ is that good. I shoot street landscape,events and portrait. The reviews are great and when I get one I can use your ‘tutorials’ to set it up and use the fab features. Thank you
I did not have the opportunity to compare them side by side, they seem to be about the same quality, but I suggest you look to dxomark or dpreview for a more authoritative result.
Maarten, have you tried the adaptor with the existing lens range. If so, are there any limitations e.g. auto focus or eye focus? Thanks in advance.
I'm not much of a fan of adapters. It does seem to work well in a limited amount of testing I did, but you're best to look to another reviewer. As for eye autofocus, until Nikon implements that for the Z6/7 twins, it doesn't work with any lens.
@@MaartenHeilbron I'm getting hold of one to test soon might hold out till they get the firmware sorted and also get an adaptor as well. Thanks
Sounds like a good plan.
Compared to D850 which one you like more? Is the electronic viewfinder worth to upgrade? Is for portraits better with the new eye detect autofocus z6 vs D850 considering that in D850 I always waist time with focus and recompose?
They're both very good cameras. The factors that you mention, if they are important to you, would swing me to the Z7, which, with the recent EyeAF upgrade is an excellent choice.
Any thoughts on a z7 refurb?
Same as any other refurb. Caveat emptor.
Sir which one is best affordable all-round z7 or z6 ?
Is that a trick question? The Z6 is more affordable.
@@MaartenHeilbron thanks sir i want wildlife & portrait photography so asked
@@arunprasads4732 The Z6 is the affordable choice.
I have the Z50. I love it. WTS, I’m considering the FF versions. If I got the Z7 it seems I could use it in Crop mode and have close resolution to the Z50. Heck, I think I could use the Z DX 16-50 pancake on the Z7 for an in-pocket walk around camera. Is this accurate?
Yes, but why hobble a great camera like the Z7 with a DX lens? Might as well stay with the Z50.
@@MaartenHeilbron I have the Z 35 1.8. I thought the 16-50 would make a good walk around lens while still being in 20MP range. Would make less sense on Z6.
@@TCinSoCal Understood.
thank you, great review.
Thank you, always nice to hear from an appreciative viewer.
An excellent review...Thank you in deed
That's very kind, it was a pleasure to read your comment.
Great review but I still love the SL2 sold me....on your recommendation I bought it....thank you my friend.
I’m always happy to help, and to have new friends. Thanks for your kind words.
Hey Maarten, thanks for your superb and helpfull videos!!! Could you help me with this one issue I have with my z6: on my other nikon dslr , I shoot RAW on one Card and jpeg on my second card. On my z6 I do the same, but as it only has one card, when I put the xqd card on my computer I only get to see my raw files? Is something wrong in my settings???
Thanks, your kind words are appreciated. Where did you find a setting to record Raw on one card and Jpg on the other on the Z6?
@@MaartenHeilbron Sorry, I didn't make myself clear: what I meant was that on my Nikon D850 I have my settings so that the Raw file goes to the XQD card and at the same time the JPEG goes to the SD card. That is easy, depending on what I want to import I choose the corresponding card. As the Z6 only has one XQD card only and I still have my camera set to shoot RAW + JPEG I would expect to find two images on my one card: one in Raw and one in JPEG. The thing is when I put my card in my computer , lightroom only shows the RAW files and not the JPEG files...
Ah ... the problem is with your Lightroom settings. The first preferences tab has a setting "treat JPEG files next to RAW files as separate images". If you turn that on, you'll see both. Or just look at the files on the card.
@@MaartenHeilbron Great! Many thanks for your help! Greetings from the heart Europe!!
Thanks, always nice to read kind words.
How come there is no side by side, video comparison between the two ❓
Indeed, why not?
How does the z6 do in sport photography? And do you think the will update their focus to include eye focus?
I think that sports photographers will want a faster burst, better follow focus and a larger lens selection, as those features are available elsewhere.
Maarten Heilbron That’s my opinion too. The Z serie is not ready for any kind of action photography because of the fast focusing problems. Maybe in the future ...
Eye AF to appear in May firmware update.
@@ChrisMosner Well, the devil will be in the details, let's hope it's as good as the competition.
quick question that might not be too relevant, but would i be able to print good/high quality A2 prints with the z6? I'm on the fence as to which of the two to get, but i do like the better low-light capabilities of the Z6. So if i can get good quality prints up to A2 with the Z6, It would be my choice given the price as well. Any thoughts?
Quick answer - absolutely. You should not have any issues at that size and larger.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thank you for your quick reply :) Z6 it is then :)
Always happy to help.
My understanding of the 200 frame burst limit is intended to keep the camera from filling your card and draining the battery should the camera be put away and some object shift to hold down the shutter release while in storage.
I've heard that excuse before - but this rationale assumes that 1) you put your camera away when it's on and 2) that you don't use a camera bag, but some other that may jeopardize the camera - not just by pushing the shutter. While I appreciate your note, please remember that no other camera manufacturer feels the need to put a limit. And if you feel it's necessary, why not an option for those of us who don't?
It's a needless aggravation in my book.
very nice job ! thank you
Many thanks, always nice to hear from a happy viewer.
Yes, very cool camera reviewer in whole youtube.. thanks Maarten
That's very kind of you to say, thanks!
Curious how you think both compare in regard to the D850. I trying to decide between the Z6, D850 and Sony A7Riii. I'm into landscapes, low-light concerts, astrophotgraphy, sports and the occasional portrait. Would like good video, but not the most important aspect.
All are good choices for any or all of those purposes. Let your hand, wallet and sense of style guide you.
Hi Maarten, could give your flickr site. I have tried to find the photos you mentionned but i failed.
Thanks for your videos and help
Sorry - it's here: www.flickr.com/photos/maartech/albums
Thanks a lot
How well do they track moving subjects like cars or birds?
If they're a reasonable size in the frame, and your hand is steady, tracking is better than average.
Hi,how do you record rhe menus of both cameras in this youtube?
Using an Atomos recorder from the HDMI port.
I do have a question. Critics make a lot of the banding issue on the Z cameras, pointing out that raising the shadows too much causes banding, due to the presence of the on chip phase detection. Do you think it makes sense then, in extreme dynamic range situations, to minimize this by pushing exposure more to the right, and dealing with the highlights later in post? Obviously there are limits to this, but I've never seen this issue addressed, as far as techniques to mitigate the problem. (Not that I see it as a big problem myself.)
I did not explore this issue. In my opinion these are edge cases that are exaggerated by those who feel the need to exploit their audience. In my judgement, while I'm sure it's an effect that can be provoked, it's not one that's typically encountered in real-life situations.
However, your thought that exposing to the right, even if it includes some overexposed highlights is a reasonable approach, I found that there was more detail than was evident in both highlights and shadows that could be exploited in RAW files. One issue here is that the dynamic range capability of the LCD and viewfinder is limited and not always representative of a final image. In camera, the histogram is your best judge of exposure.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thanks, that's an interesting point about the LCDs, I haven't heard anybody else address. I'll keep that in mind. It takes some discipline to keep an eye on that histogram. (I used to shoot 4x5 so I don't have any excuse for spraying and praying.) I agree, a 5 stop increase in post would be a very rare circumstance. I bring up the ETR issue becasue I also shoot m-four-thirds, where it is advocated as a standard strategy for dealing with shadow noise. It's almost getting funny now. The image quality in all high end cameras is getting so good, many reviewers are grasping at straws to find things to criticise. Shooting at iso 50,000 and bumping the shadows up 5 stops...really? And this underlying tone of competitiveness and downright animosity between advocates of various systems and cameras is getting tiresome. I said something nice about Olympus one day and somebody practically attacked my mother. Maybe it's as you suggest, and is largely about clicks. UA-cam is still a great resource for learning, but I'm starting to get a bit annoyed and also suspicious about motives at times. I must say that the tone of your reviews and tutorials restores my faith somewhat.
@@jonbarnard7186 Grasping at straws is a good way to describe the continuous attempt to find a topic for today's post. And I do appreciate your kind words, but will admit that providing honest and competent material is hard work and not widely appreciated.
I mainly shoot , food and weddings which one i should go for z6 or z7 ? Please let me know
If both are an option, take the Z7 for stills.
Which boy is good for video?
Not sure about boys, but of these two cameras, I'd probably pick the Z6 if video was my only purpose.
@@MaartenHeilbron I recently received the reply from Nikon "z7 is the best for video". Confused between 2 different opinions. I would appreciate if you can compare the boys specifically for video outcome. A humble request from your fan and follower.
@@RamKumar-xq7cp As the resolution of 4K video is 8Mp, the Z7 seems to be overkill.
1:16 on that kodak case, its the dutch language, do you understand it?
Very observant. I was born in the Netherlands, my mother brought that case over when we immigrated.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thanks. Is it difficult to migrate to canada? :) Im from belgium lol
I wouldn't know. My parents brought me over when I was 6.
Sir wich one is best of wedding ....Z6 r Z7
The Z7, the additional resolution will serve both for cropping images and for large size prints.
what about the dynamic range? is there a difference?
I did not have the opportunity to test that - but I am going to DSC Labs next week, so I may update this reply.
For a recreational photographer, would you recommend the Z7 over the Z6 in terms of price vs features?
Nope, the Z6 is fine for all recreational needs, and it doesn't have any more features.
I was really hoping to see how the 4K video performs in the two models
That's likely a video I should shoot, thanks for the suggestion.
Hi Maarten, new subscriber here. Truly loved your honest review however it didn't touch my interest. I can see these specs for my self anywhere however I like how you indulge in the specifics of tech. What I came to your channel for wasn't to hear about the similarities of features and spec but how well they hold up to each other with video. I would truly be interested in your review of how each model hold up to video capabilities with a sizable comparison. I ask this for my basic understanding that lower MP typically delivers better low light and binding video content. How would the two cameras match up for someone like me who has a lot of money in the Nikon ecosystem looking for a "hybrid" upgrade solution?
Btw I shoot with a D750 and want better MP for stills but also better video capabilities. I'm swinging the axe on to rather trade up my current body or simply dive into another system for strictly video that won't support my current investment.
The obvious is that the Z6 compared to my D750 would be similar in stills but taking the stride in video. So my head is why not keep my D750 for stills (that has done wonders for me in terms of selling great images) and purchasing something like a GH5 for stricly video?
Or is the Z7 my solution to a "Hybrid" need?
I would appriciate your opinion and hope to see more great content in the future.
Thanks for the kind words, they are appreciated. I think you've identified the differences (and really, there are more similarities) for video - mainly the sensor resolution. And I feel that you're right, the smaller resolution (particularly for video, after all 4K is only 8Mp).
I feel that doing quality comparisons is not really my forté, but as I do have them both for a few more weeks, I'll see what I can manage. Just not sure what appropriate or useful subjects might be.
I think you're right - unless there is some other aspect of mirrorless that appeals to you, the D750 is still a camera that will provide excellent and comparable stills.
The Z7 does provide a good hybrid solution - but in 2019, most competitive cameras (Sony for full frame, Fujifilm for APS-C, Pansonic for micro four thirds) offer more.
@@MaartenHeilbron Thank you very much for your prompt response. I'm not asking anything out side your "scope". I'm curious to your tech side observation. I'm happy with my D750, however the world is turning to 4k video feed and the body simply can't keep up.
If possible during your possession of both cameras your review would be quite interesting for video.
I can't imagine there's not others like me looking to continue down the Nikon ecosystem that would not only benefit the collection but the wallet as well.
I hope you take this as possible review for consideration since no one I follow seems to care about the video aspects of the either bodies. I think there's much more to offer than what's being put on to the internet.
There's a lot to consider as a "camera" investment for most. Especially since the tech has been decades behind its self. I think we're all wondering what's the next "big" thing and where to put our money in.
Cheers,
Kirk
Understood, I will do my best.
Thank you too!
I read your kind words with appreciation, thanks.
Maarten thanks for your review, I have currently a Z6 and a very good D750, but I started to move into the z line of lenses, they are great, I'm only remaining the 85 1.8 g and the 70-200 2.8 vr ii, the rest I Invested in z mount glass. So now the D750 doesn't have much use, I'm thinking to change it for other camera in the z system, something that complements and could be back up for one to another, but I don't know if the z7 apart from the hi res sensor for landscape can justify the price, or if other z6 could be the one but just live with medium size sensor for landscape but great for video an low light, or even I thought that a z50 could be just a cheap backup camera, great for video, all in the same system, easy to carry. I do landscape, architect, portrait photography and I moved heavy into video, also I'm a former wedding photographer. I really want to be in only one system, But I don't know if the z7 will justify the price, or if the z50 could be good enough in a pro environment? What could be your advise?
Always nice to know my work is appreciated. Yes, those are very nice lenses - that really make the Nikon mirrorless system work the investment. It's a tough call, but one you'll have to make. If money was no object, I'd take the Z7, as it really appreciates those lenses - but getting clear and crisp images requires a little more attention to craft and detail. For really sharp work I'm using a tripod and a shutter delay.
@@MaartenHeilbron great, thanks a lot! I'll save an go for the z7 as my primary and z6 as my backup and video camera!
@@ingjohnalfonso Sounds like a plan!
@@MaartenHeilbron glad to share that I finally have my z7 with me, my main photography camera now making combo with my z6, my main video camera, I'm so happy z system is an other world!
@@ingjohnalfonso You may enjoy a recently posted a video about advanced settings for these two: ua-cam.com/video/dcGJxhJIHEE/v-deo.html
Good video.
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words.
Would the 7 be much better for a landscape camera than the 6?
I think the higher resolution would be better, on the other hand, the Z6 is more than suitable, even for larger prints.
If only a dual UHS-II version exists of the Z camera... Hope they do it with different card configurations like on D5. No needing to re invent a new camera, space can be found removing xqd slot, then just release as it is because they re almost all around and great mirrorless 🤔 pro functionality and cheaper cards in a single move. What do you think? 🤓
Interesting. My first request would be to have both video data rates and burst speeds that actually take advantage of the speed capability of XQD. What advantages would you see in dual SD cards?
@@MaartenHeilbron backup and less cost. Burst speed seems to be the physical limit of the camera, because even with xqd cannot go faster expecially on afc even maybe is a software and processing limitation, new function which slow down the process of tracking 🙂 but at this point uhs ii is enough at least for me
@@nerdMike Thanks, understood.
The Z6ii will be $2000 the Z7ii $3000. The only difference I can determine is that the sensor costs $1000 more. Based on your testing of both, is the z7 ii worth the price difference??
I have not been able to test either as yet.
Hi Maarten. Thanks for this comparison. I would like to have your advices. indeed, i have a D750 and i want to switch to Z6 ou Z7. I am doing lots of landscapes and portraits. Do you advice me to choose the 7 or 6 ? Thanks
If you don't know that you need the Z7, you don't. Take the Z6.
Thanks for the review. I'm really looking forward to seeing how the Z6 will do with the Atomos Ninja V shooting Prores Raw video.
Thanks, I appreciate your kind words. About the same as the Z7. Not seeing much difference. Z6 review in progress.
Would love to know why there’s $1,800 price difference. Maybe simply because there can be. The sensor would surely not add more than a few hundred dollars.
I honestly have no idea what sensors cost - but as always, it's not the cost of the materials that determine the price.
I have been shooting with my D700 since 2012, and am looking to step up to Z6 or Z7 (keeping my D700 as my second body as it is still solid good) Usually I shoot more portraits/wedding events under available light/low light. Have not decided which to get yet, but this video has help contribute infos between comparing the two cams. Thanks.
Always nice to know my videos are helpful, thanks for commenting.
I like to take landscape, so I will have to wait a price drop on the Z7 (BTW I dont understand the huge price difference).
It is a question of supply and demand, as well as Nikon's need to generate enough revenue so that they can continue to be in business, hire and pay their employees a fair wage so they don't take a job with the competition, and satisfy their shareholders.
I understand but I will wait ... @@MaartenHeilbron
@@jpa3930 Always a good approach.
The lower resolution sensor allows the Z6 to capture oversampled 4K video, something that the Z7 can only do in Super 35/DX-crop mode. If you can survive on 24 Megapixels for stills, the Z6 could prove to be the better of the two cameras in terms of video quality..
I would agree, in general the Z6 is the better model for video.
Would love to have either the Z6 or Z7 since I am a longtime Nikon shooter. But I can't. Because all the Nikon lenses that I have are D series or even older. But they don't autofocus in the Zs! (They work excellently in my Nikon DSLR though). Luckily I also have Canon gear. So I am going to buy the rumoured Canon EOS RP.
Pretty sure those lenses won’t auto focus on Canon either. And adapted lenses rarely work as well as native. I suggest you reconsider your decision.
Yes, my D lenses won't autofocus on Canon cameras, but I have Canon EF lenses. Old, off a Canon 5D (original), but still work pretty well. Nikon's loss is Canon's gain. However I wish it was the other way round. I like the Z6 more than the EOS R, because of IBIS and weather-sealing.
D lenses are ancient.
Not sure why you're letting these old lenses rule your decision.
Well, from the previous millennium anyway.
Z 6 for me I love movies that have night scenes with those light lit in the background sexy scenes of woman in a club at night night photography is dope. And it’s cheaper come on z6 I’ll have my paws on you in a couple months
hehe
First!
Thanks!
The new Nikon Z line is flawed, not worth the money.
Could you be more specific? What flaw(s) do you perceive?
@@MaartenHeilbron crappy autofocus and no AF-C, these cameras are not for wildlife/sports photography, for stills yes, and for video. For what the Z line can do, it can be done with cheaper alternatives, the D750 can give you the same results for a fraction of the cost, and the D850 leaves the Z7 in the dust, the only thing the new Z line has going for it is the video features, which is real good and a step in the right direction for Nikon, once they address the shortcomings I mentioned, then I will gladly give them some of my money.
So you have owned and used a Z series camera ???. Or you are just sprouting non-sense
Fake news😂
I don't know about you, but my Z6 is an amazingly good camera !!!!!