Breaking Down Russia’s Vacuum Bomb, the U.S.'s M10 Booker and More | WSJ Equipped
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 чер 2024
- What weapons and ammunition are the U.S. sending to Israel and Ukraine to aid in their war efforts against Hamas and Russia? What kinds of weapons are the U.S. developing and using for their own defense?
From Spice bombs and 155mm shells, to the USS Carney and Sentinel nuclear missiles, WSJ takes a look at different military innovations and tactics from around the world.
Chapters:
0:00 Triton drone boat
7:18 M10 Booker tank
15:40 Sentinel nuclear missiles
21:59 The USS Carney
27:53 155mm shells
34:49 GLSDB missile system
41:42 Russia’s TOS-1A thermobaric weapon
48:03 Valkyrie XQ-58A AI drone
56:28 Mi-24 helicopters
1:02:55 Russia’s nuclear torpedo
1:09:03 Spice bombs
Equipped
Equipped examines military innovation and tactics emerging around the world, breaking down the tech behind the weaponry and its potential impact.
Watch the latest episode of equipped on the six-bladed “knife-bomb” that is revolutionizing precision warfare: on.wsj.com/4bROkrh
#Military #Weapons #WSJ
Watch the latest episode of equipped on the six-bladed “knife-bomb” that is revolutionizing precision warfare: on.wsj.com/4bROkrh
Produce more long format videos
ah, american military drones, made in china no doubt
@@IamAWESOME3980no, we got rid of Donald Trump so there's no more Sweet deals for China. No more Trump begging that block Chinese companies be unblocked
And what was it, $70 million of interest income he declared in China?. Finally producing our own microprocessors in America, very little chance of what you're saying happening now. Thank God
@@IamAWESOME3980 American military drones aren’t made in China.
Why does the US support Israel so much? Because Wall Street Journal and other presstitutes take their marching orders from the disgraceful Murdoch family.
$2M for a 15' drone? Is a hammer still costibg the US Taxpayer $2000?.
The drone has latest generation technology welcome to the world of cutting edge technology where if you fall behind you will die
@@KILLKING110 sure sure. 😢😢
His response was rather Pathetic and also extremely Typical for gov contracting, "well it's not too expensive, so if we lose some the Taxpayers can eat the cost". $2million for the drone, $2k for the hammer, and $800 for each individual screw holding it together. Showing once again, that these institutions need to be flattened and most top people fired. Or they'll happily continue billing the taxpayers and padding their own paychecks as always. Ridiculous amounts of money for the tools, materials, products, Thousands of foriegn places, wars and just about ANY organization involved or asking for $$$......and MAYBE if you're really lucky, there'll be some change left over for Americans and their retirement accounts. Upon being born every person is handed a large bottle of lube, so the gov can continue screwing them into Oblivion.
@@KILLKING110you maybe over stretching it a bit."
@@mrt2this607 do you have any idea how expensive it is to build and dev this stuff? Come back and speak once you have worked in the industry.
I love watching videos on the rich people's network showing me where my tax dollars go and what they do with the money they consistently inflate out of my meager savings via deficit spending (a not so hidden tax). At least WSJ is honest - war is about money and they cover money stories so it's very appropriate they are the leaders in this reporting genre 💰
Well said thx you
War is a racket
@@LukeMahan-xr4xx I recommend the book!
Poeple can't grasp larger things. Peace has a price on its own.
What a great time to be a defense contractor and double dip by owning stock.
I'm suprised I haven't seen a drone shaped like a shark with movable fins.
Lol. Those exist
Stay tuned!
they have been around for years the 1970's at least there was a movie made it was called JAWS
DARPA is listening.
@@mattk8810 I looked them up and this is what I got, Ghost Shark and Manta Ray are the names of prototype uncrewed underwater vehicles - UUVs or drones - introduced recently by Australia and the United States respectively. I'm digging deeper because I want to see one or both of these in their own environment. Thanks for the tip.
Almost $10k for a standard 155mm shell??? "$2-3 million is the sweet spot." ??? I retired from a manufacturing executive career. "Sweet spot" = It matches our capabilites at a high profit margin, while being priced so the customer doesn't notice. That phrase says it all.
I'm reminded of the last years of WWII. Germany put its faith in "wonder weapons ", while the Russians just kept producing artillery and tank shells and grinding up the Divisions of Germans and their allies, like the Ukrainian Banderites.
Anyone else see this?
100%, and yes we are the baddies……. People believe because Russia spends 1/4 on defense they are not equals, it’s how much more per dollar they get!! And the focus on what works…..
Given what we push socially and how our people are suffering ever declining living standards, this checks out. The elites don't care nor does the media. The high point of our country is choosing which elites sell us out. Both parties run up the debt. All the politicians appear to be geriatric. We risk ww3 over a corrupt foreign land because our government wants to run the world like an empire.
We tell ourselves it's doe democracy and we are the good guys but the average person is ignorant of our government overthrow of democratic government of Pakistan.
How elites look down on their citizens during recent historical events yet somehow still say it's the Russians, Chinese or Iranians that are the threat is beyond me.
If our government nationalizes arms production, these grossly corrupt and inflated budgets would go away. One would hope.
I guess they didn’t do any R&D where you worked lol
That's what this entire war is about milking U.S. tax payers and the MIC industries and its counterparts and insiders fill their pockets.
It's bull, all these people cheering on Ukraine have no idea what they are cheering for. It's pointless...
Guy's basically saying- if the boat-drones get stolen it's no problem, because it's not it the typical Hundreds of Millions, so we've no concern that these losses can't be absorbed by the American Tax-Payers. Says nothing towards potential enemies then using it against us or copying the tech like a country such as chyna/russia. Why not incorporate a self-destruction countdown after a very loud siren followed by five, four, three, two, one...BOOM!. Put a couple multi-language warnings on it saying if you steal this, it goes Boom, taking anyone/anything in 30foot radius with it to the bottom of the ocean. Be somewhat hilarious to see so pirates try and take, then their facial expressions change as they read it, then the siren and countdown....humorous no? Make Actions having Consequences Great Again.
Every government contract for planes or Missiles ...Go with the original budget and multiple it by 2.5 times ..... That will be the true budget
The military industrial complex being the benefactor of this expense to the U.S. taxpayer. In actuality the U.S. is spending money we print out of thin air.
Surprise, surprise, even WSJ falls for BS regarding a "Ninja Bomb", more than likely based not on rational and vetted facts but instead on rumors that originated with "video game warriors.". The actual weapon is a very small TBX warhead placed inside a mostly empty, AGM-114 ("hellfire") type air-frame. The missile was modified specifically to lower the cost of the original AGM-114 (which was meant to be used against tanks and heavily armored targets) while also significantly reducing "collateral damage", when used for "targeted individual personnel" (i.e. targeted assassination). due to the much lighter warhead, the missile's center of gravity as well as center of dynamic stability changed, requiring an aerodynamic stabilization solution, in the form of the six expandable knife-like wings protruding from the missile body frontal section. The "Ninja Myth" is nothing but stupid conjecture information proliferated on the Internet by substandard "drone journalists"...
Nice.
This series is great! I’m hooked
$2~$3m per small remotely boat? No wonder how easy it is to steal the bank this day.
Not so much when you consider that 2 million is 0.0001% of the yearly defense budget.
@@EnjoiCircask8 An Ukraine suicide drone boat. Used to sink russian naval ships. (Magura V5)
Costs 270k. So you can potentially sink 8 ships with those at the same cost of taking pictures with an american one.
And China/Iran can probably make twice as many for half the money. Since both of them are specialized in drones.
@barneyklingenberg4078
While this is mostly true (latest price for Sea Baby i've seen is 250K), these are nowhere near equal. Multi-role reconassaince sea drones with just optional added attack and permanent submarine capabilities, besides being autonomous and solar-poered are unprecedented. Completely different fish with different and wide roles, so for initial US price i'd say it's more than reasonable, if they do the claimed jobs. Note that planned wartime economies and centrally enforced MIC in autocracies like China, Iran, Russia, N. Korea etc. are bond to be an order of magnitude cheaper per unit (while still wasting billions on corrupted and failed propaganda projects though). Ukraine is an unique case, where free market and MIC is stretched to maximum and does not exactly follow the western profit rules, with mixed costs (materials and imported parts are not as cheap as their adversaries, while wages are now lower, which was other way round before the full-scale war). Ukrainian designed or adapted single-purpose weapons are better value in given circumstances, but you're comparing apples to orangutans here.
The US government is paying over $150 each for wooden pallets.
I'm reminded of the last years of WWII. Germany put its faith "wonder weapons ", while the Russians just kept producing artillery and tank shells and grinding up their armies.
Anyone else see this?
very well done
The Triton submersible drone should have a self-destruct feature if captured. Why risk one falling into the hands of the enemy?
Don't send them toward the enemy if you don't want to end up in their hands.
It likely has a hardware killer system similar to the USB killer devices that can fry things like motherboards
the triton is also the trojan horse.
This is the best documentry video I have ever watched
How about self destruction abilities so the enemy doesn't have our technology?
what technology bro ?? wake up sir ,,until today date and this moment at NOW ,USA and its allies plus Euro western Countries until this moment couldn't reach hypervelocity with huge failure on hypersonic projectiles projects which Russia advanced by far , Chinese Space science , and Iran drones, ballistic vehicles and aerodynamics.
wake up Sir, u r very late this time of history that u r well know industrial manufacturing methods on very nice looking & most expensive just like those Sea Drones study took years and cost billions over became the nice looking solar panels fitted on most expensive non-advanced controlling board that loosing sat signal beside US's navy still recovering those drones without its original installed cameras which stolen by Iranian's IRG after hijacked them from Pers gulf and red sea shows u that IRGC wasn't interested with drones technology it appears they interested more with its cameras and recordings 😂
lol
All of these combatants will become exhausted to the point of just fading
Sure: just like has never happened before.
WSJ said a year ago that Russia had run out of ammunition and had resorted to using shovels. Then they said they'd run out of shovels and resorted to using their own boots. Prior to that they said a Ukrainian grandma had shot down a Kinzhal with a jar of pickles. And these are the people selling us global warming, green energy, experimental gene therapies and wars everywhere. And most people notice nothing.
Funny, but you, guys, completely forgot about new TOS-2, that fires rockets x3 further (~18 km) and is already out there.
Technically interesting, emotionally scary 😨
What comfortable times for weapons manufacturers 💩
it's been like this before the war
a limerick.
A stealthy boat called the Triton
Could sail and submerge like Poseidon.
Though cheap to attrit,
Its sensors were lit,
Giving intel that sailors would write on.
Triton is a reusable ISAR platform that costs the same as a one-use cruise missile, that's a bargain.
There once was boat from Kilkenny
That could run underwater like a blenny
Now this boat wasn't cheap
Its price was quite steep
But it could sink Russian boats aplenty.
Proving options for soldiers to fight on
Poseidon is nuclear powered and have nuclear warhead dron that can dive all the world until the target is thermonuclearized.
@BorisPerc I know you're proud of it but it's a fantasy... Just like the Ruskie Mir and the fantasy of the "unstoppable Russian military" (see profile picture for how well those have turned out)
Great reporting thanks for sharing!❤❤❤❤❤
Really enjoy this type of informative content 👍
It's interesting, but there is so much sales language in here that I expect the script was modified and approved by marketing from the companies.
There is a lot of...not technically wrong, but objectove/misleading stuff...good, but...too much corporate sales language
Very much spot on, it is a profit driven industry. "Oh it is so cheap, it cost only 2-3 gazzillion dollars, oh no problem we just print more money". Well, good luck with that 🤡🤡🤡
....evil language! Not sales.
Agreed.
A lot of things are misleading, like the talk of thermobarics, we have thermobaric handgrenades its not that special. Or how ukranian helicopters had soviet dumb rocket that work just like the hydra rockets but the "expert" acts like area of effect is a new capability.
And most of the video was not about the title just US MIC sales propaganda.
It's not like the Ukraine is buying weaponry from the U.S. but the U.S. is just continuing the military action we started in 2014. There are few if any Ukrainian fighting age men left alive.
@@borninussr5615 show us an industry that's not profit-driven
The Booker, sounds like it will be destroyed immediately with modern drone warfare.
Agreed! Small cheap drones are changing the modern battlefield. Add a RPG round to one and your effective
Same weight as t90 which has 125mm calibre, automatic loader 3 crew system and atcive protection system. What a junk tank the booker is lol. I dunno who came up with that tank but he should be fired
@@dillonwest4236
You dont understand how war works so keep it shut. Aerial drones cant occuoy and hold territory and cant destroy fortifications, bunkers or trenches and are useless in proper urban operations
@@AbuHajarAlBugatti It's for the Airborne units only.
@@AbuHajarAlBugatti Exactly, and as the comment below this said, building these was for their airdrop capability. The Abrams recently got an upgrade and I dont see that MBT line going away. One huge thing they are working on is a reliable counter drone jamming, so we will see where that leads in the next year.
My grandma used to live by a missile testing sight in Marin California. She said she could see them testing the rockets right above the ground and putting them back.
This is just what they want you to see. Wonder how far classified technology has gone nowadays
Let's hope far.
@@Biker65 Competency crisis would say otherwise.
@@churblefurbles You know nothing.
@@Biker65 he thinks he’s John snow
@@Kodakcompactdisc "You know nothing John Snow''
Verry well done video. Easy to fallow
full of BS- GLSDB don't work... these are old statements from US Gov. they have since acknowledged it was rushed into service untested. We need to do better.
So, Booker tank is the newer kind of Sherman tank?
My type of journalism. Good video
I also enjoyed it
33:38 It was pretty good but they straight b******* at us about the 155 production because guess what during World War One and World War II we were out producing today's numbers by an order of magnitude but we didn't have any CNC machines back then.... they're simply bullshiting people
You like war propaganda?
@@justatiger6268 unironically yea.
How are the Houthi launching cruise missiles while keeping the range advantageous? Not from planes me thinks….
In the time it allegedly takes to build one factory to make a few 155mm shells today, WWII would be half way through and multiple factories would have been built in months producing 100s of times more shells of different calibres.
Technology has changed significantly since WW2. WW2 was about mass production, but not very high tech. This translated to a similar situation on the battlefield - large masses of soldiers, lots of deaths. Nowadays, especially in the West, the strategy has shifted towards fewer - much fewer - weapons systems, but highly specialized and extremely advanced technologically. This shapes the battlefields similarly - far fewer deaths.
In WW2, you were sometimes sending out two dozen bombers to drop literally tens of tons of shells over a rather large area to destroy one single factory, and still not damage the target significantly. Nowadays, you send out a single missile, and in 99 cases out of 100 you completely obliterate the target. Overall, although individual weapons are orders of magnitude more expensive nowadays than they were in WW2, war overall is cheaper, especially in terms of human deaths.
@@a0flj0
That was all fine until just over two years ago. Maybe watch the video before replying next time.
What took a thousand bombs to hit in WW2, took a hundred bombs during Vietnam, took one bomb during Desert Storm. Basically the same with dumb shells, verses the rocket assisted guided 155 excalibur shells of today. Then their are so called drones which may make it all meaningless when swarms of insect sized drones assault an area, each one directed in real time by a hive mind connected to an AI central control, to kill any living heat source, like a cloud of death.
@@a0flj0 1 precision bomb won't kill 3 seperate targets at the same time. That doctrine is outdated as only for small scale conflict.
Number still matter, you can't end the war if you can only shoot 1 and enemy shoot 100. That is what happening in Ukraine
We're is a peacetime economy, before the US even begun fighting, it was gearing up for war for years.
Why not use D5 on land? It can even be encapsulated in a sub tube and moved to different silos, maintenance yards and mobile deployment platforms.
An interesting indeth of technological knowledge!
Wow, this insight into war tech is eye-opening 🌐
Um…this is an hour and 14 minute video and you posted this comment 2 minutes after it was uploaded.
@@Av-vd3wk to plays devil's advocate, they could have watched it at like 10x speed lol....
Its a bot
Colombian - Japanese ??? Yep, that was eye-opening!
@@teeboogie3237 Or a member, members get to watch earlier.
Nice yoga
at 2:49 "tantamount" - I think he means "paramount"
most literate youtube commenter
We need to focus our energy and attention towards more force field shields in the Battlefield.
Try building affordable housing, cars and healthcare system first you coolies
That unmanned could be a stealthy sub, and it is hard to be hunt!
A periscope or snorkel trail is very easily recognized from the air, it was exploited as far back as WWII. Nowadays with the quantity of sensors in the air, much more, especially with the sail deployed. Objects on the sea are more easily detected and tracked than on the ground, as the sea is very uniform in contrast to the different geographical accidents that land offers for concealment.
There still stuck on stupid because the reason why drones are so much better is because how cheap they are. 10k for enemy drones vs Valkry at 5 to 10 million.
America will never admit it's losing a war
True.
We have. We lost Vietnam.
The Triton should have a camera at the tip of the sail in addition to the weatehr data sensors. That extra height can significantly increase its line of sight, especially if you have large waves. I think it would be helpful to have a thermite device to destroy sensitive equipment is captured. It wouldn't hurt if the thermite also burns through the deck of the the capturing vessel. lol
The M-10 Booker does not need anywhere near as much protection as the M-1 Abrams. Because the Booker is an infantry fire support vehicle, it really should be behind an infantry screen and never infront of the infantry, in theory. In contrast, the M-1 is intended to exploit breakthroughs, and therefore potentially expoied from all directions. To a large extent, some of its defense lies in its speed.
While the ICBM silos are spread out over 4 states, silos are also purposely clustered locally. The individual silos are spaced sufficiently apart that a single incoming warhead can not destroy two silos. However, they are close enough that the detonation of an incoming warhead may destroy (or at the very least, knock off course) other incoming warheads targeting the other silos. The silos are in teh ground and hardened. The incoming warheads are in teh air and unprotected.
It should be noted that the Arleigh-Burkes are not solely dependent on the AN/SPY-1. They can also take targetting data from other assets, such as ground radar, AWAC, or even a F-35. This may give the Arleigh-Burke more reaction time, especially against terrain following cruise missiles.
While Russia was using five times the artillery shells than Ukraine, better artillery spotting, combined with much more accurate artillery, has allowed Ukraine to almost approach artillery parity with Russia.
The Booker looking like drone catnip, lol.
Upgraded Bradleys supporting Bookers, supported by Abrams. That is one hellova force to be reckoned with.
It would be awesome to see a similar video on breakthroughs of educational technology to see how we're preparing kids to make good use of this destructive tech.
You can always make sure the command to use weapons has to be givin while everything else is autonomous.
Maybe the drone relays target information and then a person in another aircraft or on the ground issues the command. So the drone relays the information and then a human picks the play or strategy to attack the target.
Make it so the drone can't enable armed and ready to fire mode without a human. Doesn't have to be optional.
Even with man in a cockpit a drone can do many autonomous functions. Tracking, targeting. All before allowed to fire by a physical switch. Or a man does some task while the Ai does others. The neat thing is. With larger drones that they normally remote control anyway. A supercomputer burried in a mountain near a nations borders can remote control the drones through the same satellite link by taking over the remote control when we hand the controls over and read all sensor data from all aircraft such as drones and whatever and come up with better strategies including how to jam or avoid jamming.
So a supercomputer can bring anything we have just one frame of information about from any sensor a man may have missed to the attention of a man who can make a decision.
Good thing Nvidia with the new Blackwell technology made a new chip that with just one rack on a server or datacenter is more powerful than the current most powerful supercomputer and it's Ai at 1.4 escale for one rack and supercomputers usually have many racks.
So within a few years tops we will be beyond exoscale to the next scale
There is no way to know if a man is piloting something inside or remotely or autonomously.
And no way to verify any of this without spilling other military secrets about any aircraft.
Because you would need insoections of hardware and possibly software to verify.
Then add in with SSD's you can hot swap datasets / instruction sets.
For example a drone learns from humans and from flying and doing missions. Then you can swap out the SSD and review everything at a base. Then you can decide if the algorithms the drone learned are good enough to go to a whole fleet or if you want to tweak.
Then anytime a mission needs something else entirely. Swap the SSD's out and new ones in and ready to go wants weapons or other equipment is loaded. And that would spherehead any attempt at knowing if an adversary is using ai because they could swap in a dumber system software set within minutes.
I figured at minimum supercomputers will help man and optionally take over the remote control a man normally uses. Just the processing of all image data and mapping faster and more efficiently than humans is a major bonus. And this doesn't have to be outside of any internal ai the drone as for when there is no communication. For example. During jamming the drone can complete the task and fly home because of terrain mapping it does while flying and also having maps preloaded from satellites including the live maps when not jammed from satellites.
There is nothing stopping us from doing any of this. The hardest part is finding a good setup where we don't always allow the drones to have control but is only optional when needed.
For example. We are in a bad war. Maybe it even went nuclear.
Well we can use autonomous drones for when we need a direct hit but we couldn't survive the mushroom cloud. A man could fly it all the way to target optionally unless it gets jammed at the last minute.
Sure we won't let AI be in control of nukes but if a war is bad enough. We may need to hit a hardened target precisely. For this a drone could get low and dive to the target with controlled flight. Either release a weapon or be the weapon.
Works even better if it's stealth.
When there is a new model order, I would hope allowance is made for in line first order improvements should such occur prior to completion of a first order. Seems to me, if significant, any feasible improvements should be added to the first model if caught in time; rather than simply waiting until the first order is finished as ordered. Seems wasteful to complete any order without known improvements being incorporated, just for the sake of preserving the completeness of the first, or any order. Rather, when a significant improvement can be added to the original order, simply negotiate the cost adjustment, add the improvement to the remain see of the first order, calling it a 10A. After that, pray tell, include those improvements and any subsequent others into a second model grouping for future orders.
The problem with GLSDB is that it was rushed into production and wasn't ready yet. Ukrainians have not used it much because they found that the Russians GPS jammers were taking it off course. They were missing and that is a problem. Russian EW is good despite having a horrible army in general.
2 TO 3MILLS FOR A PLASTIC RC toy boat while other countries prioritize quantities and affordability... The MIC is ruining the USA.
Lol get scammed
Cheaper, but will the projectiles pierce the armor as well as the M1A2 120mm main gun projectile also crew safety which tank better serves that?
How about top protection for drone defense?
A Triton is the same cost as Tomahawk? That’s way too high.
Bro it's a solar autonomous submarine that's small, it has incredible potential
Mother effer is a sailboat AND a submarine, and its solar and autonomous AND can be self sufficient for 3 months at a time.
Before you say the Triton is too expensive, consider the costs, it requires a dozen bag of bushings worth 90 thousand dollars and comes fitted with that state of the art 10k toilet seat.
It ain't no rc sailboat that grandpa totes around the lake.
@@debaterofeverythingpresent2775 triton does not have a toilet
When the WSJ is posting videos about military weapons, understand that both parties know exactly what's coming up next.
It's been nothing but blood money anyways I wonder why black amerikkka is silent instead of waiting till the last minute to eat anything they can from across the train tracks
I think there is a bit of confusion about the Russian tanks reactive armor (pictured) and the shells used by the auto loader, which is internal to the tanks. Fun video that is also informative, thanks!
That Triton, if equipped properly, could be an excellent tool for oceanographic research! It could observe marine mammals, track birds, and observe physical parameters like currents, water temperature, etc. I can't wait to see what marine biologists do with this!
Doubt marine biologists can afford to pay 2-3m per piece....
Ai is going to be the death of humanity 😭😭😭😭
It wont ... individuals like You will help about "arteficial" ... whether like or not ... that could be problematic there goes explination that you should confront .... Go Try That :))))
@@80proteinbonny let’s learn to gather our thoughts and write them down first. Then we can talk, how about that?
I want to see more of th m10 booker
Where would you like to see that? 😂
A gentleman's club that hires exclusively "the newest and naughtiest IFVs in the country!"@@wew5499
After seeing what is happening in the Ukraine I don't think the M10 Booker would last very long on the modern battlefield. More armor, and/or better defensive weapons against ultralight drones are needed to survive today.
Slava TSMC 🇹🇼
@@001vern The reason that Russia and Ukraine have been losing a very large amount of equipment to drones is because they lack any defense systems against small UAVs and neither side has air superiority. The U.S. currently has anti UAV weapons at its disposal and is currently producing many of them to use so it would be different circumstances.
Thunderfoot did a video on the Thermobaric weapons,, if you are in the area where the oxygen is depleted, you are also in the lethal blast radius.
Mistake in this video, these DDGs and CG's with the aegis radar system in combat center can actually use the weapon systems on other ships as well
War is not meant to be won it is meant to be Continuous
This is the same drone we see being tow by an Iranian small navy boat without nobody doing nothing about it.
"Thank you WSJ for the new tech" - Chinese navy
The M-10 "Booger". I did that!
USA should probably focus more on electronic warfare and drone defense.
and active protection
Look into the AN/APG-85, and "Nixie" torpedo decoy systems. The US also has pods that can be attached to aircraft to add jamming capability.
I am not sure about drone defense.
Ok, General. 😅
We should focus on Health Care, Public Transport, Climate Change, etc.
Imagine though a million drones coming at you 😮😱
This is more of an advert for defence contractors than anything else
No it’s not! Are you a troll or an adversary? Talk like that is insane.
Maybe US 🇺🇸 should disband the Military? Borders are open and inflation is growing. Guess we need not attempt defense else Contractors are blamed for promoting War? PATHETIC!
@pricedrightkeelsandwheels3591Have you ever looked into adding a tower to your battleship?! It could all be enclosed and painted to improve the battleship theme. Everything besides the bridge. I think the all metal looking enclosed bridge with isinglass windshields would look pretty cool. With the fly by wire setup you have, it makes it super easy to add a second station.
Cartels watching the submarine drones like :🤤
If the triton take out ccp landing craft it could be pretty useful
That's the plan in Taiwan. Flood the Ocean with drones similar to one's used by Ukrainians in the Black Sea.
One question what engine does it have? Does it light up from low orbit sats like the abrams? (Due to the jet enginge)
That dude pal like a vampire
They say "counter adversaries" , but they just meddle around for decades so they are the "adversaries" everywhere...
I am surprised that Russians do not know that Tuborg beer is a known Danish brand which is owned by Carlsberg.
imagine a stealthed version of the triton, armed with enough explosive to silently attach to an enemy submarine and blow a huge hole in its side. This obviously would explosively decompress the sub and destroy it. Wow! A 3-5 million dollar weapon system like that able to take out an enemy sub that costs a thousand times more to build and operate!
how many can fit in it would make sesnse as an evac vehicle too if there is no air support. I am guessing they are safe but you need to splice fiber optic cable but copper cable can just be induced through currents from the surface you just need something that can penetrate the ground electrically.
Basically, technology like drones, guided glide bombs, and constant surveillance capabilities means armour is useless now. It goes to show how hopeless it is for infantry and armoured personnel in a modern conflict. You are sitting ducks to people in computer rooms far away from the front lines. Nothing but meat shields.
You obviously have no idea about landwarfare. Yeah go let a fpv destroy fortifications, deep trenches, bunkers, hold ground, occupy land, act in urban warfare
As one need to take ground and secure advanced positions, tanks and Infanterie are still most important. But yes, there job just got tougher
That's correct Iran, you get toy solar powered boats to combat your Navy 😂.
Iran’s entire navy was destroyed by the US after just 1 American ship was bombed. There’s nothing else to prove to them.
One hole will sink you
@@jameslopez9661 will neutralize carriers as well, and who relies on expensive platforms is the question.
@@churblefurbles”Will neutralize carriers,” highly unlikely.
The MIC taking the concept of "cheap drones" and getting cost up to 3 million dollars is why the U.S. will get pantsed the moment it has to engage an actual peer in war lol.
38:46 🤔
We can really just tell it to penetrate for a lil while…
and then explode.
Awesome updates for old technology
like me.
Ukraine has found the GLSDB does not work when fired from artillery. They have had to modify them to use as air-dropped and in that capacity work real well... but when fired from artillery, they simply don't work.
GLSDB missiles are counter measured by Russian jamming.
Such big muscles and such small faded brain that commands all this power.
I am a drone pilot and retired chef, if you can get me out there, I'll do what's needed.
for the effect of a nuke underwater- check out operation crossroads baker shot
The US has been using thermobaric weapons since the Vietnam War.
In recent years they have conveniently renamed them as "novel explosive" to avoid bad PR.
Hundreds of thermobaric Hellfire missiles have been used in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria - often in urban areas with little regard for civilian casualties.
and i love how they accuse russia of attacking cities or “urban areas “ with out names of the cities. i was waiting for this bit of propaganda.
video orlink of the proof is require or your words will vanished
Who cares.
And, we're the 'good guys'? 😂😊
Imagine the clean up after the 155.
200,000 a month. JFC
Hope for the planet is fading
Once production of weapons hit full stride in the US, Japan was swallowed whole. Question is just what it will take to wake the sleeping tiger! It’s ridiculous. Even when there is profit to be made this process can’t be moved to China. Greed tainted this system, but will also get it rolling.
Ramjet shells sounds pretty cool…
Can the Trition escape fishermans net?
Journalist: "Will the Triton be weaponized?"
Company rep: "That depends what the customer wants to do..."
Me: Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Letmegetthisright. Russia fires 20-30,000 shells Per Day and the US went into this mess producing only 14,000 shells per Month ? Half a day's supply. And it will only reach a three day supply/Month in Two Years ( while Russia will again have increased its production over that time).
Meanwhile the Ukrainian ground forces advance WW1 style into this baffling barrage WITH NO AIR SUPPORT. 47:00 Humanitary Concerns ? Lets give Ukr. Cluster Munitions that drop indiscriminate landmines covering Donbas. eg: "Some 4 million to 6 million land mines and other unexploded munitions are estimated to have littered Cambodia's countryside"
WSJ: Where is your Adult Assessment of the current US Administration ?
Adult eating chocolate chip ice cream. Near the red button
Meanwhile, Russia is dominating the battlefield with shovels and washing machines....
Ok.👍
_Russia is now one twentieth of one percent larger than it was in 2022, and all it cost them is half a million lives, and the respect of most of the world._ 😨 ⚒ - j q t -
@@quill444 get your facts straight...
Does anyone know if the Booker tank has the Trophy Protection System or similar?
Very interesting comen s
You know someone is getting ripped off when a shell costs more than a car engine
That someone is you (if you pay taxes)
So in Ukraine the drone war is getting scary. The soldiers getting attacked by those drones don't always see them. Sometimes they go about their business and even looked right at the drone above there head and didn't even notice.
Then when not having designated targets. They go out on hunts with drones 24x7. Day and night.
Then the scary parts is seeing drones do circles soldiers trying to get away from and trying to hit with sticks.
But the drone operator is toying with them because he could have already hit the button to kill him. Then goes in for the kill and target eliminated.
Or other footage i seen where a guy hides from a drond behind a tree but doesn't see the drone behind him.
Other things i seen on different media is how they also use land drones to go bomb them in foxholes or land drones to sometimes recover aircraft drones by hooking up and hauling them back.
Ukraine is a lot more experienced with the smaller civilian sized drones for combat than we are. Then add Russia is always on the hunt for drones. You sometimes hear them but can't pinpoint exactly where they are and you hope they don't see you.
Other things i seen is that sometimes when Ukraine launches drones into Russia then they get jammed. Keep going and then sometimes unjam after they are outside of jamming range and regain control.
And if you see one drone there is usually several around.
They fly in buildings with blown out windows or opened doors or blown out ealls and everything else to hit there targets such as men on foot.
Oddly the drones have been fairly accurate and most of the time hitting their targets.
I see at least one that managed to fly the drone in the tank hatch itself.
I seen other footage where another drone swings around. Stops for a second then darts at a Russian tank and the turret blows off.
Sometimes they are strapping old RPG style grenades to them for the tanks. Drone Still light enough to carry and blow up a Russian tank. They only need the explosive part of the rpg.
When jammed they send more drones out while sitting in a bunker and keep trying. The video feed usually gets jammed first. They use one drone that not dji brand. That has the target tracking and stuff some consumer drones have. Usually they replace optics with better optics. Infrared or whatever.
I been watching a lot of the journalist videos that came out recently.
Like Darwin's war from scripps news. It's about Ukraine's ace fpv pilot. And several other journalist shows about drones on the front lines in Ukraine that all came out within the last month or 2.
I forgot to add. When jammed they keep sending more out until successful. Then maybe the first few came up short but they only need one to make it to the target. So after a few drones or so they got the target despite the jamming.
Russia just developed a “shotgun” adapter to hunt for drones, very effective. Is like shooting a duck.
>Oddly the drones have been fairly accurate and most of the time hitting their targets.
Because you see only succesfull strikes? Even if 90 out of 100 are jammed/missed/downed you'll see 10 videos and say "wow, all of them reached targets".
I assume we believe our adversaries already knows about this tech, otherwise why are we advertising it?
Imagine how education in the U.S. could be improved if they put a tenth of what they use for weapons production into improving learning.
Cool, 1 Hour of Taxpayer's Investment Presentation!
Maybe you’d rather try icing in china or Ruzzia..?
Regarding the booker Tank platform. Good idea compared with a Abrams but was not the STRIKER system invisioned to do that job what now is planed for the Booker? What happened to the STRIKER project?
I like the boat drones
It is a good game Changer in ocean
You can deploy 1000 with your fleet
Marvelous engineering 😮
1. Russia is saying they will use nuclear weapons first if NATO countries attacks them directly
2. Putin is scared of NATO conventional superiority
3. Russia focuses more on Nukes
Everyone knows - none of the sides wants to use nukes, because that exchange will kill all of us. Conventional weapons are defensive and offensive, while nukes are considered only as repellent (for enemy to think twice of gambling)
Russia is showing weakness in conventional war and the West still call them aggressive? Conventional superiority is sign of aggression, while NUCLEAR THREAT is saying clear words - STEP BACK..
Normies don't want to use nukes but leaders don't give a f a out it, they have their multi-million bunkers that can keep them alive for years if not decades.
Good idea: Russian troops should step back into Russia. Claiming a neighboring country’s territory for your own is in no way “defensive.”
3 to 4 million not expensive? what world is this guy living in?
The SDB is a great option
Can we all agree that in the current age, nuclear bombers are effectively obsolete compared to the the other options? Bombers capable of delivering nuclear weapons on the other hand are extremely effective with more conventional bombs and missiles. Just not for dropping a nuclear weapon.
Why was US military drone operating near Iran? US is half of the world away.
Cause The US can be any where.
Protecting shipping from Somali pirates and Houthi rebels.
Am I the only one thinking the narco tech teams watched this in their brainstorming session 😂
Anyone know what the knife is the guy is using at 5:39? It sounds like it was vibrating to cut or am I hearing things?
EC1 Easy Cut 1/2"L Electric Cordless Scissors