1957 Hudson hornet, last year of Hudson
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
- Today, On what it’s like super special treat for you today not only is 1957 the last year of the Hudson hornet the car featured is the very last Hudson hornet ever made starting the production run with a solid white car and ending the production run with a solid black car. Because as you will see in the pictures in the advertisement most of these cars were either two-tone or tri-tone colors…
Really Cool comparisons in this episode as well as advertising specs history we talked design of these rolling works of art. Also for those unaware this is the sister car to the rambler rebel one of the most underrated overlooked cars from the 1950s
Enjoy this episode =)
If you’d like to get in touch with me shoot me a comment in the comment section below or check out our Facebook group by clicking the link below after the show if you don’t have Facebook and would still like to reach me send me an email at
What_its_like@yahoo.com
www.facebook.c...
Something by the BEATLES '57 Hornetrocks!
"Something"
Yeah buddy congratulations you got it I’m starting to find instrumentals because they’re a little bit harder but I wanted it to be a song about something that’s ended.. and I felt like that song fits this car the vibe. =)
Well done 👏👏👏👏🍻✌️
Awesome job !
It's really a shame that during the fifties we lost many independents, most with long and honored histories.
Sadly, we'll never see cars like them again. Parent Company Curtis-Wright ordered Packard to cease production in '57 also. Ironically, Packard was in trouble, but still relatively stable before ill advised Studebaker merger.
Yes, Nash didn't bother me so much, since I never cared for the look of Nash's cars anyway, but losing Hudson was a real shame...the worst one to me, was losing Packard...and tragic to see them die as "Packardbakers", like the Hudsons dying as "Hash's"...I think, really, the Packard name had more value than the Studebaker name, it should have been kept even if meant losing Studebaker..they should have moved Packard back to where it should be...a top tier luxury make. In it's heyday, Packard was a gold standard of quality and luxury, not only by American standards, but by World standards...
Even if we loosened the exclusivity China has, and favorism toward China in trade, it would help a lot...if we could trade with other countries on an even table as China, we would have other sources...Brazil, central american countries, Turkey, Pakistan, India, Vietnam, Indonesia, and other southeast asia countries, possibly some African countries...we wouldn't have all our eggs in one basket, which I think is not a good thing...@@zippydastrange
Technically, anyone can get into an industry like auto-making, but how many have access to the resources & billions it would take just to open doors & keep the lights on, let alone actually produce something? Preston Tucker was last independent who tried to break choke hold oligopolies had over domestic car market. He warned of what could happen when the "little guy" gets shut out.
What happened eventually, is the foreign companies took over...@@a.leemorrisjr.9255
Many consider the cars built after 1954 Hashes because they are rebaged Nashes!
Yeah I can definitely see that but the styling is different between those two models I have never seen a 57 Nash but I’ve seen a 55.. that is a different looking car It’s not bad styled either the dashboard is very interesting if I remember correct it’s kind of in the center
I LIKED THAT!
They finally got rid of the wheel covering front fenders on the ‘57. More restrained than the Hudson,
@jdgimpa: Being rebadged Nashes the styling started to look a whole lot better especially the 1956-1957 models. The 1957 Model has performance that can rival the Chevy Corvette and the Chrysler 300. The NASH being a lighter car in weight can easily compete performance wise.
@jdgimpa: But then the styling dramatically improved! The best styled are the 1956-1957 models.
This is the last year for Hudson. 1958 was the last year for Packard, and DeSoto in 1961?
Yup
What’s crazier yet is this was the last the very last Hudson hornet ever made so it has all the options the only thing it doesn’t have is it doesn’t have the tri-colored paint scheme that a lot of them had
The owner was telling me that the very first car was all white in the very last car was all black
Wow what a car, love the grill work! That car had everything, it wasn’t enough! I would be honored to own this car.
If I owned this car, I'd keep it in the living room as art work, or an amazing couch/sleeper!
Simply DeLuxe! I shall rush out and buy one now.
I love all the orphan cars from the 50's I would take any one of them.
Me too I love a lot of different cars and it’s always been like that for me the weirder the better just like being different
'57 Rebel !!! The Hornet was sister car to the Ambassador, not the Rebel, and weighs about 700 lbs more, and has a14.5" longer wheelbase, than the Rebel, with the same engine. No way does it have an under 10 second 0-60 time. Great coverage of the styling (?) details. You mentioned the resemblance of the rear quarters to the earlier Nash cars. That's because thats the same body Nash brought out in 1952, The Hudson fins are welded to it, like Dodge did to it's 55 body, to give it the 56 fins. No way would George Romney have let them tool a new roof skin, in the last year of a low volumn car, and the last 2dr hardtop, until 1964. Its the same as it was in 1952. By 1957, theres no Hudson in the car, except for the badges and weirdly designed add ons. Thanks for the close ups! Gotta love the hood ornament. Some real mid century modern art. 👍
Yeah should have said cousin.. lol sister too close
Thank you so much for all of that insight and information
www.automobile-catalog.com/car/1957/1079135/hudson_hornet_custom_four-door_sedan_overdrive.html#gsc.tab=0
@@What.its.like. 😎👍
Could you do a "What's It Like" video on the Hudson Metropolitan? It was a rebadged and retrimmed version of the Nash Metropolitan, but much more rare and lesser known than it's Nash near twin sister.
I haven’t found a Hudson metropolitan yet but I’ve done to Nash versions they made four series of that car I’ve done the first series and the third series one was a convertible one was a hardtop..
That is a car that I Want to own I’ve actually been looking for one to buy but I don’t wanna spend a whole bunch of money on it and I want to do three episodes with it.. =)
I want to compare it to a 55 or 56 Thunderbird because they look very similar when you’re sitting behind the wheel and there is more room in a metropolitan and there is a 55 Thunderbird
@@What.its.like. - I've only ever seen one and before that I didn't even know a Hudson version of the Nash (and later AMC) Metropolitan even existed. The car was in a wrecking yard in Niagara Falls Ontario about 30 or 35 years ago. It was completely intact and running and bodywise it was in quite reasonable condition. I could have bought the whole car for a $150! At the time though, I was big into '60's era muscle cars, so to me the car was just an oddball anomaly that I had absolutely no interest in. But now, with hindsight and some 35 odd years of maturing and greatly broadening of my automotive interests, it's now a regrettable case of "I coulda', woulda', shoulda' bought it but didn't".😢😢😢
I totally know what that’s like =)
Every year around here there’s always a Studebaker Silverhawk that pops up on Facebook marketplace for $5000 I’m hoping this year I’ll have enough money for that the problem is is I want too many cars.. my wife isn’t into Classic Cars so that you know we can’t have too many.. I have a 52 Chevy truck it’s my every day truck so anytime I need to use the truck that’s the truck only truck I have.. my wife told me that I can buy a car but the whole family has to fit in it so I’m metropolitans kind of sort of out of the picture but I don’t know I’m still looking..
Or Maybe a Hudson "super-jet" compact!...Rare, even then.
We’ve done a jet there’s one for sale locally I was contemplating on whether or not I should propose that to my wife as a family car we should potentially buy instead of the Metropolitan but I’d rather have a metropolitan I think
We’ve done a jet there’s one for sale locally I was contemplating on whether or not I should propose that to my wife as a family car we should potentially buy instead of the Metropolitan but I’d rather have a metropolitan I think
ua-cam.com/video/mqXrDwnZC-I/v-deo.htmlfeature=shared
Beautiful car . Lots of chrome , never enough in my opinion , and we got a road test ! What a treat
Yeah hoping one day we get to go back and see it again I wanna see it open up. Because that car has the goods and I just want you guys to see what I can do.
'55 has better instruments and grille... Hudson good looking by '57 and has the fabulous Hydramatic transmission option... too bad they couldn't keep going...
1956 to 1958 is my favorite styling era. Interesting that the '55 & '56 Hornet could have a Packard V8. If you research it that V8 was designed to grow up to 500 cubic inches. Unfortunately all the Packard V8 gurus have died in the last 10 years. That engine's only weakness was the oil pump but there is a well-known aftermarket fix.
Must of had some serious bore spacing.
The '55 could also be had with the legendary 308 flathead six.
@@JohnnycdrumsOh yeah. Packard knew they couldn't afford to design new engines every few years. In the 2 years it was on the market it was the horsepower "king". They kept it 5 to 10 horsepower above whatever Cadillac made.
It’s hard to believe Studebaker would allow the Packard V8 to be supplied to AMC, but…they were hard up. I must disagree with Jay on the Corvette being the fastest car in these years. I believe the Studebaker Speedster and the Golden Hawk were the fastest production cars in ‘55 and ‘56. The Rambler Rebel was the king in ‘57, only because it weighed less than the Hornet.
@@seanhoward8025The Packard engine also went in the 56 Ambassador, while the new AMC 250, was in the Rambler. The fastest car top speed, and the quickest car are not the same thing. The Rebel and Corvette were the quickest 0-60 mph, the FI 283 was top at 7.0 to the Rebel's 7.5. Top speeds were recorded, but are never used in AMC's claims. Cars that are quickest, are usually geared quite differently from cars trying for top speed. The Rebel was a 3 speed/overdrive, with a 4:10 gear. I'm pretty sure the Corvette would have had a 4:11, or 4:56, neither likely to top more than 100 mph, by much.
This thing is crazy, very ornate.
I think the stylists were grasping at this point.
However, nice long wheelbase with very little overhang.
Wing mirrors as the Brits call them, love it.
Corvette boys at GM had some power, they were not happy when the 87 Buick Grand National V-6 turbo was faster than their Vette either, never mind the GNX !
Yeah nothing could ever be better than the Corvette it’s same is true today and the journalism department is still in bed with Chevy it is ridiculous but if I grew up if I was around back then I would’ve gave the end dependence the credit that they deserved I try to do that here.. =)
One day this is B a bucket list thing for me I would love to find a rambler rebel and a 57 Corvette and run them I don’t wanna drive the cars but I will video them racing I wanna see which one is faster.. I would love to drag race a bunch of 50s cars actually I’d love to throw the Studebaker golden hawk in there as well because that’s a really fast car that nobody thinks is fast, i’ve heard they would walk a Thunderbird I would love to race charged 57 Thunderbird against a golden hawk from 57
1958 Edsel citation with a manual transmission versus a 58 Desoto adventurer would be another great race
That car is so so so good. Handsome power too
Sounded amazing super smooth ride
I think I would like to have the ‘57 Rebel with factory Air!
Great choice =)
The owner was telling me that the Hudson version got hydraulic valve lifters whereas the rambler rebel had solid lifters so they could make more adjustments to the engine.
I like the 1954 Hudson Hollywood hardtop. And the Supercharged 1957 Golden Hawk
Awesome choices
I'll bet a 57 Studebaker Golden Hawk would give a 57 Corvette a run for its money.
One day I would love to race 57 Rambler rebel 57 Corvette 57 Goldenhawk.. and just set the record straight =)
Rambler Rebel 4 door hardtop. The 1954 Hudson Hornet.
1957 Golden Hawk ❤️
1930s Hudson Great Eight 👏👏👏 great running and reliable 😉👍
Another great episode i enjoyed it 🤠✌️❤️
Great choices glad you dig this episode =)
That car road so nice it might actually be the best riding 50s car that I was that I ever rode in.. I got to drive a 56 Nash cross country Rambler wagon and it was a very comparable experience but I think this rode better than that.. Head and shoulders above a 57 Chevy 57 Chevy rides like a truck just saying 57 ford wallows, 57 packard same feel I got to drive those three cars from 57
7-8 second 0-60 times were pretty amazing for '57
That’s what I’m saying and 1959 ambassador wagon when goes 0 to 60 in 8 1/2 seconds that’s incredible I was told anything faster than 10 seconds in the 50s is fast
@nealsidor1323: No doubt this engine has to be run on premium leaded gasoline for this kind of performance.
@nealsidor1323: No doubt this performance has to be on PREMIUM LEADED FUEL. No way on Regular Gasoline!!!!! It would most likely ping or knock on Regular Gasoline.
@nealsidor1323: No doubt this performance is achieved using PREMIUM LEADED FUEL. No doubt it would most likely ping on Regular Gasoline.
I think the final years 1956-1957 are the best looking Hudsons . The 1956 Hudson Hornet has the PACKARD V8 of 352 cubic inches and 2 speed heavy duty Twin Ultramatic Transmission. It too is definitely no slouch!!!!
Nice looking, a bit ornate side though. I'd pick the Golden Hawk, but would pick this one in the second scenario. 😎
Sweet choices this is a super under rated very overlooked car for what it is the crazy thing is is they made less than 800 hard tops no idea how many are left
I would like to see you do a video on a 1955 Willys Bermuda, I have only ever seen one in person. A beautiful compact car for it's time.
We’ve done a Willys areo coupe I’m still looking for Bermuda would also love to find an edsel Bermuda those are cool and rare as well
The goal of this channel is the cover all of the cars between 1930 and 1964 I mean every single car.. (American) I realize that that’s going to be a bit of a challenge but I’m up for it =) I would also like to cover different body styles of different cars not going to cover every single year and every single body style that would be a little bit redundant.. but who knows we are having fun.
Here is the link to the willys areo
ua-cam.com/video/rWNtASmyoB0/v-deo.htmlfeature=shared
I’m from this era…..but honestly, I never knew a single family that owned a Hudson in the late 50’s.
they were really rare... I was born in 1957 and I don't recall ever seeing one of these.. Maybe when I was really young and didn't know what they were, but.. yeah.. I got nothing..
The front end is somewhat clunky, but overall this car looks kinda great, especially in black; it just doesn't look like a "proper" 1957 model. '57 Chevy could live with that; not the case with Hudson, though. Really, annual model change was THE cancer of U.S. automotive industry in 1950s & 60s... The "finettes" have a hand-made quality to them, almost as if bent from sheet metal on a die, rather than stamped - unlike the rest of the body. I would guess things got so dire that Hudson couldn't even pay for new stamping equipment during the development cycle for '57.
Beautiful, unique car. Especially with A/C. And we got a ride, so I'm a very happy camper. I share your enthusiasm, Jay!
He lived in the city I wish we could’ve opened it up maybe we could do that in the future who knows it won’t be the first time that I go..
We took it to the gas station and when we came out there was a bunch of people around it the one guy was asking me everything about it this was one of those weird episodes I put the episode together before I even shot the car and then I had to go back and fix a couple things..
But that car sounded even better in person than I did on the video I wish I could have gotten the sound better. It was an awesome day =)
I can’t wait to find a Rambler rebel
The 57 Rebel should be at the top of any group of three choices.@@What.its.like.
Sweet =)
I do not think it actually had air conditioning...just vent settings...misleading? I did not see the AC compressor under the hood.
The 1957 did have a flatter roof profile according to the Hudson intro film. If you look at them side by side the 1957 was about an 1" lower in the center. The side window profile was the same on all three years.
That was something I totally forgot to mention is the offer two different roof sizes I guess in 56 it was 2 inches taller than in 57 and they also change the wheel size it route 15 inch wheels and 56 and 57 they went back to 14s giving it a lower profile.. The owner is huge in the Hudson community and he gave me all that information.
The dash had the heater controls, and it said "air conditioner" too...but I did not see a compressor under the hood...maybe that meant the car only had vents for air conditioning?!!
Ouch. Love the Rebel, but the Golden Hawk is my all time favorite 50’s car.
Golly that is one good looking interior! And the pull out glove box was genius. WYR: First choice, can’t go wrong with any of the. Second choice, 1951 Hudson Hornet - it’s a legend, but the 57 would be an easy pick as well. Thank you as always ~ Chuck. P.S. iirc the fins on the 57 are actually bolted on and the chrome strip on top hides the seam.
With the introduction of the 1957 Chrysler and Ford products it was obvious to everyone that a new era had begun. Hudsons were obvioslly facelifted Nashes, based on a body from the early fifties. All the trim and added fins were lipstick on a pig, no matter how good the car actually was. Nashes and Hudsons were relics of an earlier period. Just the dashboard design is obviously completely outdated.
It _is_ nice to go for a ride in the subject car, so that's a plus.
I was really hoping that by this point we would do that more.. last year I worked at the Classic Car dealership so I got to drive a lot of those cars. This year it’s not like that but yeah I definitely would like to go for more rides that’s for sure I love sitting behind the driver gives you guys the Impression that you’re driving it
1st choice, 57 Rebel; 2nd choice, 51 Hudson Commodore. I would also love to have a 57 Hornet and/or Ambassador.
Awesome choices =)
WYR: Studebaker Golden Hawk, 1951 Hudson Hornet. I'm going to the Charlotte Auto Fair Saturday. Enjoy Greenfield Village!
Awesome did you enjoy Charlotte =)
Greenfield Village is absolutely epic I’m going to hopefully maybe try to do a live thing tomorrow my phone isn’t the best phone in the world.. but who knows absolutely epic you’re definitely a must see if you’re into anything pre-1932
WYR #2: The first car reminds me I haven't watched Porky's in a while.
Never saw one like that guess they only made 25-30 of them dad had a 53 the hudsonite leaked all over the garage
Another great year of my birth car loved the 57 Hudson & Nash, they are flashy and colorful, they went out in style, and the Nash had neat tail and backup lights, Hudson the grille. Liked the 55 Hudson dash. First pick the 57 Rebel the second, the 57Hornet hardtop. Nice ride with the owner .
Thanks for another great video Jay keep them coming. I’d never really paid much attention to the hornets other than the step down models and I think the 51 is the best looking so id choose that one but the 57 really seems like a great car had I been around back then I definitely would have bought on of those over a ford or chevy. I always looked at the Hudson’s as a more upmarket car than a mercury or Oldsmobile my grandfather had a 54 and he kept it until he passed in 1970 and all the uncle’s wanted so grandma sold it to a stranger to end the dispute 😂
The 57 Hudson Hornet was not a "sister car" to the Rambler Rebel. It was essentially a Nash Ambassador with even more gaudy trim than the Nash. The Rebel was a completely different, much lighter car that would leave the Hudson kin the dust.
I want to more than anything find a rambler rebel owner that would want to run against a Corvette and all of the cars that were said to be king of the hill.. I think they only made 1500 of those cars I have no idea how many survive
I had a '56 Rambler (same body as the '57) that I put on a Chevy Malibu frame and I went through several different ideas, from a 350 Olds to a 350 Pontiac with a Muncie 4-speed. after 30 years I lost my shop and had to let it go. It was obvious I was never gonna finish it anyway. I'm getting old. I still have the Muncie.@@What.its.like.
@@What.its.like. That Rebel was the first car with electronic fuel injection, and that version was the fastest car that year. You could order it, but all the 'private-owned' care were eventually switched back to carburetors as they couldn't make the injection work reliably. The factory did field a car for drag racing. It beat the Vette's fastest times and beat them heads-up on match races, but they never ran at sanctioned events. That car disappeared and nobody knows where it went but but too was believed to have been switched to a carb and possibly sold the public. The Rebel was also the first "muscle car"; it had a performance V8 in an intermediate body, dual exhausts, raised gearing in the rear end, and a 4-speed manual gearbox (which was actually a 3-speed w/ overdrive), and was marketed for it's performance. Good luck finding one
I’d take the Hudson over the other AMC cars and it’s a tie between the 51 and 57. That 57 is beautiful and exactly the 50’s car I’d love to have. The other would be a 57 Century Riviera or the 57 Oldsmobile Super 88.
Awesome choices =)
Nice car but I prefer the rambler. If I had to have a Hudson my favorite is still the ‘51
Same here.
My family had a new 1954 Hudson Wasp. It didn't have power steering, so Mom had to make very wide turns to get it home. It was lemon yellow with green nylon interior - hideous.
Thank you for sharing that car with us great Memories even if the color combination was a little bit out there
Good job featuring the unique styling on this great car.
=)
7:20 That emblem reminds me of Desoto.
The hood ornament doesn’t take pictures well.. I never knew that about the hood I always thought the hood came all the way to the edge like just about every other hood
'51 Hornet "Doc" of course
My vote. 57 Studebaker.....hands down
18:42 It looks a little like a Russian diplomat car ...
The gas mileage on this car is most likely using PREMIUM LEADED FUEL which I think it requires even with the 9.1 to 1 compression ratio!!! No doubt premium LEADED FUEL would make this a top performer with acceleration in the 0 to 60 in 7.8 seconds obviously!
I would go for the '51 Hudson Hornet first and the last of the true Hudson's, the '54 second.
51 Hudson hornet my favorite I really wanna cover one before this year’s over..
I have a really good friend with a 54 who is building a race car out of it we’re hoping that it’s done next year it’s going to have all the decals and everything but he’s going to drive it on the street it’s got the 7X engine in it it’s something I can’t wait for
@@What.its.like. The real Hudson Hornets WERE factory racecars. The original stepdown design of the '51 Hudson made it a better handling car than others. I have seen one '54 Hornet and it had a different body, more modern and squared up. It had the "Twin-H" traditional Hornet 6 but it had the older type Hydra-Matic, with no Park.
I'm not sure if these were still step-down. I didn't think to look.
Typically, Hudsons used the Hydra-Matics behind the Commodore 8's.
I don't think that there were Hudson 8's by 1954.
Even the "Twin-H" 6's were a little doggie on the low end, so the best application would be a lower-geared rear-end with a 3-speed manual with O/D.
1954 was the last year of the step down.. The last true Hudson in a lot of ways
I like these 3 years Hudson('55-'57), but I wish they had done more to distinguish the body shell from the Nash which it was based on...the rear window treatment, and the "fresh air" scoop behind the hood are dead giveaways that it is a "Hash"...that said, I think these 3 years Hudson looked better than their Nash counterparts...Nash's always looked "frumpy" or "stodgy" to me...and I was never a fan of their front "fender skirt" look...that just added to their frumpiness..BTW, those fins on the '57 are fiberglass add-on on the '55 body...the '56 achieved the "fin" look by adding that die-cast chrome piece to the '55 body. Other companies with limited budgets used the fiberglass add-on fin treatment, also...Studebaker used them on their Hawks and other models. I don't think they were fiberglass, but one of the worst cases of "add-on" was Studebaker's '58 models, which used add-on headlight bezels on the '56-'57 fenders to make them wide enough to accept quad headlights..now THOSE really looked "tacked on"..
I thought they were tacked on but I heard conflicting information so I didn’t want to say they were when they wasn’t start a war in the comment section kind of thing.. lol thank you so much for sharing all that information and insight really appreciate it
1957 Hudson had 'V-line' styling - count the V's. Overdone. The 55s were fairly clean however. Not a bad car - good road eater - but clearly outmoded by 57, as it used essentially the 1952 Nash body, with updates and was priced in Buick Century territory and above a Super 88. Just not competitive. Essentially a holding action, but then Romney went all in on Rambler and Hudson/Nash was no more. Those glove draweres were a good idea, Packard had as well. Plus you can play cards on the rear seat center armrest. WYR: 1) Rebel - how could there be a quesiton? 2) 51 Hornet - original is the best here.
Thank you so much for sharing all that insight and information great choices =)
The Hudson appears very rugged. Many stamped in body shapes adds strength. That 327 engine is a masterpiece! The top and glass looks similar to a Studebaker President Classic. Great car but I personally find that it looks a little awkward. As if it was designed by committee and not smoothed out. This car is to big for 14" rims. Great video!!
Great insight they went back to 14s to give the car a lower sleeker look
Glad you dig this video 55 Nash ambassador tomorrow
Actually, I like the 1955 Hudson, looking very modern for 1955 and a combination of a 1955 Chevy and Chrysler. They messed its simplicity up with the too busy and cluttered looking 1956-57 models.
My father worked for Jim Moran, whose dealership, Courtesy Motors in Chicago sold a very large number of Hudsons. Shortly before Moran switched to selling Fords, the chairman of Hudson offered him the job of Hudson president. Turning the job down, Moran said not only was he making more money as a very successful dealer, he said he believed Hudson could not be saved. After leaving Chicago in late 1967, Moran eventually became a billionaire working for Toyota.
Beautiful car but why would Hudson put the Ariel in front of the mirror, would have made more sense to put it behind the mirror. Love that slide out glove box, what a cool idea. 1957 Studebaker Golden Hawk, 51 Hudson Hornet.
Great choices I absolutely love the slide out Glove box as well =)
the hudson shown here has a lot of the options that are on my 59 AMC. have a 327 3speed w/od. years ago i got it up to 135 mph. matched a new 280 z. my back seat was full of crap and the trunk had a lawnmower having out the back. car presently has 489k miles on it. I heard that hudson designed that 327 that AMC used on their bigger cars. Now they are both gone.
Nash designed the engine that 327 is super underrated for what it was.. I’m a huge Datsun fan I want a 240z eventually triple Weber’s and a big can haha stock of course.
We did an engine series on 1st and 2nd gen amc v8
ua-cam.com/video/QYpG7OjsZOY/v-deo.htmlfeature=shared
YEAH I USED TO HAVE A TWO TON 1948 STUDEBAKER DUMPTRUCK AND I HAD IT FOR THIRTY YEARS AND SOLD IT RUNNING AT THE TIME AND I HAD ALSO A STUDEBAKER PACKARD PRESIDENT A FORTY ONE YEAR MODEL AND I HAD INHERITED A STUDEBAKER PACKARD STATION WAGON IT WAS MY DAD'S AND I HAD SOLD IT THEY ONLY MADE FIVE HUNDRED OF THEM LIKE IT IN MY BIRTH YEAR OF 1958 NOW I'VE GOT A WW2 FORD SCRIPT JEEP AND A FEB10th OF 1942 THE LAST SCRIPT JEEPS WAS NOT MADE AFTER FEB TO EARLY MARCH OF 1942 MY MOTHER'S EIGHTY SECOND IS IN FOUR MONTHS SHE WILL BE 82 AND TWO DAYS LATER THE FORD SCRIPT JEEP BY FORD WILL BE 82 YEAR'S ON FEB THE 10th OF 2024 ALSO HAVE GOT A 1944 WILLY'S WAR TIME JEEP AND A MB A 1941 ALSO I HAVE GOT A WW2 CLARK PLANELOADER MADE IN 1942
Thank you so much for sharing all those cars with us =)
1: 1957 Hudson Hornet.
2: One of every year model Hudson Hornet ever made.
Too bad they don't make the Hudson Hornet anymore. Love those things.
Have to look at the new Dodge Hornet - which as acquired AMC.
@@alanblanes2876 Wait, what?
@@alanblanes2876it's a FIAT.
Sweet choices =)
Jay, you DO find the rare jewels of days gone by, just like Indiana Jones. Hope you have a safe trip to Greenfield/Dearborn tomorrow!! 5:50 I think the 57 Rebel engine was faster off the line than even the Vette's. A four speed automatic in 1957? I think the only other US manufacturer to off that in the late 50's was Cadillac. WYR 1. Studebaker Hawk 2. A 54 Hornet.
This place is absolutely epic I’m still up here I was only going to spend one day but I decided to spend two.. =)
Hudson is famous for never making a V8?
That car doesn't resemble a Hudson I think its a Nash a much cheaper car with a nice interior.
Yeah Hudson never made a VA this was Amc V8which evolved from the Nash V8
Super underrated engine a car that I’ve been looking for is an ambassador wagon with a 327 V8 I heard they go 0 to 60 in 8 1/2 seconds which is pretty impressive 1959
@@What.its.like. The executives were obviously driving Ferrari's and not their own products and out of touch with the working class cars and truck they were trying to market.
Nash Bones Some Hudson and Kaiser Developed 327, Totally A Nash Ambassador Interior.
WYR: Golden Hawk; 54 Hornet. Nice!
This was one of those ugly/ beautiful niche cars
( like Barbra Streisand)
I'd have owned one of these
This car looks better in person than it does in pictures pictures do not do it justice but it does definitely have some questionable styling going on.. Pininfarina
@@What.its.like.Pininfarina had little to nothing to do with the styling of the 55 through 57 Hudsons, hence no badge like on Nash.
57 Hawk
51 Hornet (my birth year)
I think that car is nice but I honestly don't like the styling on the grille it's a little bit too busy for my taste. Really love that interior though it's really stylish and there's plenty of room in there.
Great choices =)
This is definitely an acquired taste
Hi Jay!: What a GREAT car! I always liked the Nash/Hudsons! The 1957 in particular. It's nice to know it had that great 327 in it! Frank Spring was a pretty fair designer. He was behind the Hudson Italia, one of the coolest cars of the 1950's. Hudson was seriously thinking of carrying over the Italia designs for their 1955 line until they were bought by Nash/AMC. There was at least one prototype 4 door built with the Italia front and rear end design incorporated. Anyway, REALLY like that '57! Part of the reason that these great little cars didn't sell as well as expected is that Ford changed the car game in 1957. The Fairlane 500 brought the longer, lower, wider design to American automobiles, and beat out even the 1957 Chevy in sales. Any cars that were not at least somewhat wider and lower were not going to last for 1958. Rambler was a different story as it was an economy car, so to speak, so the styling could be different (read VW beetle, other foreign econo cars, and the soon to come Studebaker Lark). You are killing me on the WYR's this time, as I can't pick the 1957 Hudson, which I REALLY like. But it's got to be Studebaker Golden Hawk for #1, despite not being as fast as the Hudson, but THAT DESIGN!! #2 Going with the 1951 Hornet, the 1954 car was kind of nice. and they sort of got rid of the earlier look, but it's kind of fussy.
I would consider this car more Nash than Hudson. Hudson was merely a trim package, with a garish grille. The roofline had the Nash-type reverse "C" pillar. It's interesting that Nash had continued to use the Hydra-Matic automatic, which Hudson had used back when Hudson was still Hudson.
This was the last generation of the Hydra-Matic, actually named the Jetaway Hydra-Matic. Besides the introduction of a "Park" selector position, internally, it was different from any Hydra-Matic before this. It might be considered a pre-shifting transmission. The transmission was totally self-contained, with 2 internal fluid couplings. The transmission would change gears by draining one fluid coupling and filling the other, which had already had the next set of clutches engaged. This presented a smooth but long drawn-out shift. This was a true "slushbox".
Interestingly, it shows an optional "automatic overdrive", not indicating which transmission it was optional on. Possibly Rambler's first use of the Girling/Laycock electric overdrive. Rambler had this option coupled to either manual or automatic transmissions later in the 1960's. Often it was used with Ramblers which had a console-mounted gearshift. I've seen it on both Marlins and hot-rod Americans. There was a separate shift lever in the console next to the transmission shift lever.
Even later, in the last generation of Dodge Colts, which looked like AMC Pacers but were built by Chrysler-Mitsubishi's Hyundai sister company in South Korea, they had a twin-stick transmission which acted as an overdrive but actually operated by changing the final drive ratio giving the cars a little help accelerating in a lower gear.
, creating a launch gear. It was fully synchronized and could be shifted at any speed.
Did this suedo-Hudson have the optional overdrive?
Thank you so much for sharing all of that insight and information I always appreciate it when you share all the transmission specifications because that’s a lot of information I can’t find and it’s super confusing with the hydra Matics during this era. The advertising said it was a flash away the owner said it was a Jetaway and the owner is one of the biggest Hudson parts people around. So it was confusing but he told me that it’s a four-speed unit. It has overdrive built into the transmission.. It was super confusing so I figured I would say both
@@What.its.like.a Hydramatic bought from GM. Nash offered Hydramatic from 1950, Hudson from 51.
You mention the Rebel. I'd have to look it up again but IIRC that O/D was a Columbia unit behind the standard 3-speed box.
@@P_RO_ Columbia made 2-speed rear axles. They didn't make an OD unit which fit behind the transmission. After 1941, the Columbia rear end was gone.
Nash and Rambler used the BW OD units for many years and as I stated with the Pacers, they started using the Girling/Laycock planetary electric OP units, like the British cars and Volvo.
I had a friend in High School who had a 1965 or 66 Rebel coupe withe the squared-off Rambler Classic body.. It had the sports roof, T-10 4-speed and the 287 2-barrel V8. It had bucket seats and a console.
Looking at pictures, a lady that I worked for had a Rambler Rogue, which had bucket seats with an automatic and twin-stick console. I'm not sure which engine it had, but Rambler was famous for making a car all show and no go. The Rogues were built on the 60's rounded body American chassis. Just like the SC/Rambler(which first had a high-output 327 V8.
@@danielulz1640 Of course. Only GM and Rolls-Royce(through 1967) manufactured the Hydra-Matic. GM sold it to any car maker that wanted it, with Nash probably being less prestigious to use it.
Beautiful Car. Nice to see the older gentleman uses it.
Golden Hawk please. And could you have yer daughter sing more surf tunes?
Thanks
For sure
Great choice can’t go wrong with the Studebaker golden hawk =)
I'll take the 57 Studebaker Golden Hawk, thanks very much....
Sweet choices
After looking at the seats folded down in those Nash and Hudson cars I have to say they do not look comfortable at all.
Just doesn't look like a place to get a good night sleep. Anybody ever use them?
Neat car!
I Had a 1954 Hudson Hornet Hollywood Hardtop which were the Last True Hudsons !
How did you like that car.
I got to review a coupe this year I really liked it.. 51 is my favorite year for the hornet I saw one but I didn’t get a chance to cover it I covered a bunch of other stuff at that location I might go back to that location when the weather gets crappy
Kind of reminds me of a Russian Zil
What a beautiful car! The shame of it is had to merged with Nash. Once that piece of SH*t George Romney had say, he destroyed the brand, as well as Nash.
All I know about Hudsons: Over 82 years on this planet and I have never known anyone who owned one, not even a neighbor.
I always had an eye for the Rebble.
Oh…I’m thinking it could BURY that 12 mph speedo…😂
Haha
Beautiful car. This one appears to be missing the unique "v" emblem that would have been on the grille below the badge ornament?
Looks like center of steering wheel missing a cover: love the 57 beautiful; guess would be hard yo replace that missing piece from steering wheel
The horn button was on the seat I don’t know if he popped it off to make some sort of adjustment
@@What.its.like. Thanks: I didn’t catch it during video. Glad he still has as imagine would be impossible to replace
I’m sure he has spares he’s like one of the biggest Hudson parts people in the hobby..
Golden Hawk! 54 Hornet! Something by the Beatles!
Great choices
This was something =)
Interesting review and car . Although as subjective as anything just a bit over done for me . I prefer understated elegance.
This is definitely an acquired taste but I can honestly say it looks a whole lot better in person than it does in pictures we took this car to the gas station and it drew a crowd
@@What.its.like. I have no doubt this would draw a crowd as it is very unusual . But my thoughts are that many of the older vehicles would draw a crowd.
Very true
I have a friend who owns a 61 Rambler cross country wagon.. and he was telling me a story about a time at a car show when he parked in front of a 65 fuel injection stingray and his wagon it has patina it’s been on the channel. Everybody surrounded his wagon nobody cared about the 65 Corvette.. to the point where the owner of the Corvette. Told Bruce not to park by him again hahaha
The knobs that retain the valve covers were taken straight from the 2 stroke Detroit Diesels! The engine sounds awesome! The styling is 🤮🤮🤮 what a homely car. But that motor sounds total BAD ASS!! ‘MURICA!!!
Goes back even further than that duesenburg stutz had similar styled valve covers marmon had similar as well.
you for got the fold down rear arm rest test ,can 2 sit back there. and each side have room for their arm .
I did fold it down but it didn’t work proper so I left that part out
57 Hudson Hornet, 54 Hudson Hornet
Cool choices =)
Studebaker Golden Hawk.
1954 Hudson Hornet.
Awesome choices =)
Hard to choose here can I choose two? okay then 1) the golden hawk 2) the 57 hornet
Yeah of course those are great choices =)
Richard Arbib was the designer of the 57 Hudson Hornet. He also was responsible for the Hamilton Ventura watch.
Interesting how different the '55 is from the '56/'57, yet has the same roof, doors, front fenders and hood. Just the trim and paint being tweaked makes such a difference. That glove box/drawer is awesome! I wonder how that never became a thing with the industry as a whole! Camping... haha... right... that's what my parent's called it (wink wink)... AMC/Nash/Hudson were such under-rated cars. Too bad they didn't make it. Would love to see the ideas they came up with for cars now. 1) Oh, Hornet for sure! 2) I like the '57, but my grampa had a '74... does that count? LOL Great episode Jay! Awesome car, awesome walk-through and commentary!
Glad you dig this episode I’m with you I totally dig a glove box drawer it’s an outside the box approach to the situation and if you know me I’m going outside the box kind of guy you probably could’ve put two of those cameras in that it was deep. Great choices too
I had to take a second look at the 56 because I was under the impression that they change the front end but they left the rear end the same and that wasn’t true they did change it that’s why we compared all three
Super underrated car
@@What.its.like.57 Hudson and Nash have a flatter, less crowned roof than 55 and 56. That, and the switch to fourteen inch wheels, lowered the car's height by nearly three inches. With that exception, 56 and 57 Hudsons have the same sheet metal. The fins are bolt on over the 56 quarter panels which are virtually the same as 55. The 56 has a taller taillight bezel which connects to a lower, shorter chrome fin on top of the 55 quarter panel. Pretty clever restyling when you can't afford new sheet metal.
Isn't there supposed to be a V piece of trim in the middle of the front grille on the 57 Hudson?
@@andrewwanner6855 yes, and no. There should be a gold vee on the grille, but factory photos show it with and without.
Only a few over 4000 Hornets built in 57. How many Nash Ambassadors rolled off the lines (non-Ramblers)? I think they were overall better looking given the stacked quad lights and fully open front wheel weeks. But in 55 the Hornets were definitely better stylewise. Maybe the 57 Hornets would have benefitted from a return to body color headlamp bezels and the deletion of those fendertop pieces.
55, looked a little like a Hudson still...
57 Stude
51 Hornet
song? not a clue!
Sweet choices =)
12:56 Also the "windshield squirt" foot-pump.
That’s what I thought it was =)
Interestingly, Infinity uses the Hudson grille design today.
Great video. I think the Hudson's aged particularly well in styling. Scenario 1 - 57 Hornet. Scenario 2 - 51 Hornet.
Sweet choices happy you dig this video =)
Excellent vidya!!
Plymouth had fins that were quite similar
I like the 1956 and 57.
=)
I like the 1956 😀
I presently have scale models of the 1955 &'57 Hudson. My cars of choice would be '57 Hawk and the '54 Hornet.
Sweet choices =)
Would you mind sharing photos of these? I just bought a 57 Nash Ambassador model, now being assembled/painted. Who made 55-57 Hudson models? What scale are they?
Hudson became AMC, and AMC was taken over by Chrysler. So Hudson lives!
I suppose but Chrysler isn’t nowhere near the company they were, it’s like same family but 7 places down the line
Hudson
AMC
Chrysler
Daimler Chrysler
Chrysler LLC
Fiat Chrysler
Stellantis
@Alan-Iv9rw: The Hornet name lives on in Dodge's New compact car recently debuted. The 327V8 was absolutely no slouch at all. The 57 Hudsons and Nashes with this engine most likely left allot of cars in the dust from stoplight stand starts. They probably even out dragged Cadillacs and Lincolns from a stand start being somewhat lighter weight cars.
I would rather have the 57 Studebaker and the 51 Hornet. I may have riden in a 51 or a year very close to it. I don't know the exact year, but the father of one of my elementary school girlfriends had a Hudson, and he gave me a ride to school in it. The 57 pretty much resembled an ugly Rambler. After seeing this video, I can see why the Hudson brand died. To be honest, in my humble opinion, American Motors struggled to make a car that could compete in the American auto market. Jeep carried that company trout the history of the company. When Chrysler bought AMC, it really was because they wanted Jeep. They gave it a half @ss attempt to keep the rest of the company going with the introduction of the Eagle model name into a new brand name. They had two models, the Vision and Talon. Those were just cosmetically altered Dodge and Plymouths. Ironically, now I am afraid we will be seeing the end of the Dodge and Chrysler brands, leaving only Jeep and Ram (formerly Dodge Trucks).
It’s really sad though what happened to Hudson? They made some killer cars up until that point when they became amc Nash streamlined everything into their product
👍👍