I really appreciate your videos. From the Philippines. Thank you so much. It always helps me with my practice. More power and success to your Sir! :) Keep inspiring and educating. Much appreciated.😉☺️
Great explanation. Most people who explain this take the lazy way and use a prior statement in a deposition because they can ask the witness if they were under oath. I think that non testimonial statements are more prone to the witness just lying about having said the statement.
First off, love your videos, thanks for all your help. I’ve been fighting a DUI Manslaughter charge in which I’m not guilty. I recently found out that the lead/head investigator on my case is a documented liar within his own agency. He got a disciplinary write up for not being truthful, he radioed in that he wasn’t in pursuit/ giving chase and actually was. I would really like to share with you what I have to get your input on the magnitude of my finding(s). If I can’t contact you, could you please post a response here? Thank you in advance.
8:02 with due respect, aren’t you being dishonest deceitful of the witness since you are lying, or tricking the witness? How is this meant to be about the truth, going about dishonest ways of getting the information? This is the scary part of the judicial system. Seems hypocritical asking witnesses to tell the truth? Maybe 🤔 as an average person, I am misunderstanding this twist.
These videos are very helpful. I think they have better covered, in a short, time what my professors took months to do
Thank you so much for your videos, I love them!
I really appreciate your videos. From the Philippines. Thank you so much. It always helps me with my practice. More power and success to your Sir! :) Keep inspiring and educating. Much appreciated.😉☺️
Great explanation. Most people who explain this take the lazy way and use a prior statement in a deposition because they can ask the witness if they were under oath. I think that non testimonial statements are more prone to the witness just lying about having said the statement.
First off, love your videos, thanks for all your help. I’ve been fighting a DUI Manslaughter charge in which I’m not guilty. I recently found out that the lead/head investigator on my case is a documented liar within his own agency. He got a disciplinary write up for not being truthful, he radioed in that he wasn’t in pursuit/ giving chase and actually was. I would really like to share with you what I have to get your input on the magnitude of my finding(s). If I can’t contact you, could you please post a response here? Thank you in advance.
US Codes Title 18 subsection 1512, 1509?
Authorization is there
Facts are Evidence
Or the night of the facts.
8:02 with due respect, aren’t you being dishonest deceitful of the witness since you are lying, or tricking the witness?
How is this meant to be about the truth, going about dishonest ways of getting the information?
This is the scary part of the judicial system. Seems hypocritical asking witnesses to tell the truth? Maybe 🤔 as an average person, I am misunderstanding this twist.
Facts
Working together with the US is what?
Their willingness negligence from DOJ plus FBI. Matter of fact Homeland had to bring them out.
Authorization from Former Presidents why things are happening
Victims and a dead one can speak
It’s past witness.
That's why you always take POLICE TO TRIAL THEY ALWAYS TAMPER WITH EVIDENCE AND COMET PERJURY !! 😳😳😳🐽🐽🐽🐽☠️☠️☠️🎥🎥🎥🤣🤣🤣🐷🐷🐷🙊🙉🙈
I am a Victim which I am.
Capital
!
Sorry Negligence
I deserve mine!