We will address your questions in our upcoming podcast "Let There Be Answers!" Please leave your questions below 🤩 ua-cam.com/video/gxcOC8MuR58/v-deo.html
It is not so much a question as why Christianity, which was revolutionary then, and is at any time, had to be filtered by the Church. The Church likely had to do it as Christianity deals with consciousness; Christ Consciousness. Even today consciousness is referred to as ‘the hard problem’ by philosophers. What the Church had to convey had to be done symbolically in the ceremony of the Mass. The two things to be conveyed by Christ Consciousness were: Transubstantiation and Transfiguration. At any time, even at the cusp of a quantum age and with consciousness being ‘the hard problem’ these are difficult topics to convey, except symbolically. So it is symbolized in the Mass where ‘bread’ likely symbolizing the body and ‘wine’ likely symbolizing the blood are transformed and transfigured into ‘the body and blood of Christ’ which is likely both Transubstantiation and Transfiguration and deals with consciousness. Not consciousness itself, which if fundamental does not need transformation but human consciousness does. Christians see Christ as the one and only embodiment of Christ Consciousness; although in the East there are Avatars who have had, and have, a similar state of consciousness. There is plenty said about physical or elemental evolution and maybe a little about psychic evolution; but much less about the evolution of human consciousness; likely as what that means, or would mean, is not easy to comprehend; especially as consciousness itself is not comprehended; hence its designation as ‘the hard problem.’ The implications of this, as we are still material-age bound; although we are now in an automatic age, having left the material age behind with splitting the atom, and are moving towards a quantum age at some future time. Will Christianity still be relevant then? If it has to do with consciousness it will be, as we cannot think of an age when consciousness will not be relevant. In its absence there may be something but it would have no meaning without consciousness. Little wonder it is ‘the hard problem’ for philosophers.
@@ALavin-en1krit's very interesting how Christ is a composite of so many different belief structures and that Christianity then fine tuned his outline
@@JamesBarry-j7m True. Christ consciousness; Krishna consciousness. Consciousness is universal. As I mentioned before it is ‘the hard problem’ for atheistic philosophy.
@@JamesBarry-j7m Post next to what I am responding to. Christ consciousness or awareness of consciousness not just in the body and environment but in the whole universe and is not a composite. Cosmic Consciousness or Christ Consciousness is; it is not a composite of anything as nothing exists outside it.
For sure better now. I liked hearing the questions, some of them were very good. However, sound level was too variable and taking questions mid lecture disrupted the flow.
In the questions you spoke about Joseph in the 'traditional' views and Mary being raised in the temple. From what source is that, if I wanted to read more? Thank you for the excellent lectures.
From what I have seen it appears that the Gnostic gospels primarily focus on cosmology and the knowledge of that being the source of salvation and don't seem to say much at all in terms of moral teachings. Is that an accurate interpretation, or is that just what gets talked about most because that's where the divergence is?
In the Gospel of John, Jesus identifies with the light of pure conscious saying “I am the light of the world”. In saying 77 of the Gospel of Thomas, Jesus says he is the light over all and he is the All. This nondual not dualistic as is often claimed about the so called “Gnostics”
John your analisis is great and I like these videos a lot. However the complete lack of a "non dualistic" view, limits understanding severely. A proper non dualistic model will integrate a lot of what the gnostics describe. If there is a need I could provide you with the basic non dualistic model.
1. Those who wrote the gospels and who never had met Jesus, belittled his disciples, although he chose them. Why? 2. They made up a story and the disciples knew the truth. 3. Story: Bodily resurrection. Truth: Resurrection is a spiritual event (Luke: heaven is within you).
Where did you get this source? From my experience, Christian are the one who seems to want to help the vulnurable the most. According to research, people who are religious or Christian tend to give more away in donation or what not to poor than atheist
one of biggest ironies in western history is Paul's distortions of Jesus' teachings. without Paul, Jesus and his movement would have been a very minor sect of Judaism instead of the dominant religion of the western world
But as Bart Ehrman points out, if Jesus called himself "God" (in the flesh), why doesn't the earliest Gospel (Mark) mention this? How could Mark possibly not point this out? Suspicious.
Unfortunately UA-cam automatically adds tons of ad breaks as soon as the lecture ends. We go and remove most of them as soon as we can. We always leave 2 or 3 ad breaks per lecture because this is one of the main sources of income for the channel since we don't have a pay wall.
I wouldn't want to be associated with Jesus either after he was arrested in a park with a naked boy (Mark 14:51,52). claiming not to be a pirate/human trafficker. And I think Pontius might have gotten it right, and when I revisit these stories with the perspective of Jesus being guilty person, who comes across as a highly educated in philosophy, with knowledge of medicine/drugs, seeing Jesus as a con man healer who manipulated the poor, the lost, the prostitutes and the sick with knowledge, secrecy, drugs and antidotes, the stories and miracles make more sense to me as plausible. So my question would be, is there any evidence that supports Pontius and his case? Super rough question I know but I can't help but wonder
Anger in Christ's response was due to the misplaced healing request. God Almighty is the sole source of power and healing. Inspite of His teaching folks were approaching him for prayers request. This dependency on others than God Almighty what Christ was looking to break
We will address your questions in our upcoming podcast "Let There Be Answers!" Please leave your questions below 🤩 ua-cam.com/video/gxcOC8MuR58/v-deo.html
It is not so much a question as why Christianity, which was revolutionary then, and is at any time, had to be filtered by the Church. The Church likely had to do it as Christianity deals with consciousness; Christ Consciousness. Even today consciousness is referred to as ‘the hard problem’ by philosophers.
What the Church had to convey had to be done symbolically in the ceremony of the Mass. The two things to be conveyed by Christ Consciousness were: Transubstantiation and Transfiguration. At any time, even at the cusp of a quantum age and with consciousness being ‘the hard problem’ these are difficult topics to convey, except symbolically.
So it is symbolized in the Mass where ‘bread’ likely symbolizing the body and ‘wine’ likely symbolizing the blood are transformed and transfigured into ‘the body and blood of Christ’ which is likely both Transubstantiation and Transfiguration and deals with consciousness. Not consciousness itself, which if fundamental does not need transformation but human consciousness does.
Christians see Christ as the one and only embodiment of Christ Consciousness; although in the East there are Avatars who have had, and have, a similar state of consciousness. There is plenty said about physical or elemental evolution and maybe a little about psychic evolution; but much less about the evolution of human consciousness; likely as what that means, or would mean, is not easy to comprehend; especially as consciousness itself is not comprehended; hence its designation as ‘the hard problem.’
The implications of this, as we are still material-age bound; although we are now in an automatic age, having left the material age behind with splitting the atom, and are moving towards a quantum age at some future time. Will Christianity still be relevant then? If it has to do with consciousness it will be, as we cannot think of an age when consciousness will not be relevant. In its absence there may be something but it would have no meaning without consciousness. Little wonder it is ‘the hard problem’ for philosophers.
It's interesting because he is a composite of several different belief structures he has been molded into something.
@@ALavin-en1krit's very interesting how Christ is a composite of so many different belief structures and that Christianity then fine tuned his outline
@@JamesBarry-j7m True. Christ consciousness; Krishna consciousness. Consciousness is universal. As I mentioned before it is ‘the hard problem’ for atheistic philosophy.
@@JamesBarry-j7m Post next to what I am responding to.
Christ consciousness or awareness of consciousness not just in the body and environment but in the whole universe and is not a composite. Cosmic Consciousness or Christ Consciousness is; it is not a composite of anything as nothing exists outside it.
I love John's style of delivery and abundance of knowledge. Many thanks to the Centre Place team for another great lecture!
Lol, started reading this thinking you were referring to John the biblical author.
Thank you John and Centre Place. As always, excellent content and delivery. Appreciate your time and efforts !
Another wonderful Hamercopia of Knowledge tonight. Can't wait for the Q and A stream next week. See you then, Hamerheads!
I love these videos too! Proud Hamerhead here 🙋♂️
Hamerhead! Love it. Put it on some merch, I'll buy it!
@@hamnchee oh that's an idea
@@centre-place I'd buy it too!
It's so much better without live audience which always use to interrupt the lecture instead of waiting till the end
Agree 💯👍
Yes
Seriously, Covid was the best thing to happen to this channel, as insensitive as that may be to say.
I couldn’t agree more. 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
For sure better now. I liked hearing the questions, some of them were very good. However, sound level was too variable and taking questions mid lecture disrupted the flow.
Thank you so much for the community you've helped build. I haven't missed a video in months 🎉
Top shelf presentation....thank you
Missed it live but always catch up eventually.
Thanks
Thank you for your support!
Would love to see a lecture on Emanuel Swedenborg. As always this was excellent 👌
Superb as always. Thank you
Would love to hear a lecture comparing and contrasting the Christian, Muslim and Gnostic versions of Jesus.
Fantastic stuff as always my friend 😁 cant wait for the new series with you and Leandro
I look forward to Hamertime.
Hamer the homie !
This content is like fine dining for me. Thanks!
Mulțumim!
Thanks for supporting our lectures
In the questions you spoke about Joseph in the 'traditional' views and Mary being raised in the temple. From what source is that, if I wanted to read more? Thank you for the excellent lectures.
@centre-place, I wish you had a playlist or database that can be sorted by date of lecture and topic. It's hard to find on UA-cam and the website.
From what I have seen it appears that the Gnostic gospels primarily focus on cosmology and the knowledge of that being the source of salvation and don't seem to say much at all in terms of moral teachings. Is that an accurate interpretation, or is that just what gets talked about most because that's where the divergence is?
Yes, you are correct. That's why they are not in the Bible.
I would love to hear your thoughts on the Shroud of Turin given recent scientific findings.
If you read scripture it tells us that Yeshua had a face cloth so the Turin doesn’t fit in with the Bible verse
I don't care if it rains or freezes, long as I got the gnostic Jesus
Early Christians had a lot of hot sects.
😂👏
Let’s hear it for hot Christian sects!!!! Yeah baybee!🤣
21:10
In the Gospel of John, Jesus identifies with the light of pure conscious saying “I am the light of the world”. In saying 77 of the Gospel of Thomas, Jesus says he is the light over all and he is the All. This nondual not dualistic as is often claimed about the so called “Gnostics”
Anger magic the aggression applies the affect
John your analisis is great and I like these videos a lot.
However the complete lack of a "non dualistic" view, limits understanding severely.
A proper non dualistic model will integrate a lot of what the gnostics describe.
If there is a need I could provide you with the basic non dualistic model.
1. Those who wrote the gospels and who never had met Jesus, belittled his disciples, although he chose them. Why?
2. They made up a story and the disciples knew the truth.
3. Story: Bodily resurrection. Truth: Resurrection is a spiritual event (Luke: heaven is within you).
‘If the Christ be not risen, my faith is in vain & we are yet, in our sin’. Salvation revolves around a bodily resurrection.
@@masada2828 That is what they told you.
Paul did not experience a bodily resurrection
@@juliusmanjengwa6465 Although he reduced the message of Jesus to bodily resurrection. However, he had never met Jesus.
Helping the poor is what modern christians hate
Sometimes seems that way unfortunately.
Very true. Many of them want to outsource their charity to government.
Big government small church!
O God help you. 😮@@hamnchee
Where did you get this source? From my experience, Christian are the one who seems to want to help the vulnurable the most. According to research, people who are religious or Christian tend to give more away in donation or what not to poor than atheist
one of biggest ironies in western history is Paul's distortions of Jesus' teachings. without Paul, Jesus and his movement would have been a very minor sect of Judaism instead of the dominant religion of the western world
The irony is that we might have it backwards: Paul's teachings distorted into Jesus'.
But as Bart Ehrman points out, if Jesus called himself "God" (in the flesh), why doesn't the earliest Gospel (Mark) mention this? How could Mark possibly not point this out? Suspicious.
The gnostics sound wonderfully full of themselves
Jon I'm asking for behavior advice. I was invited to Amish church tomorrow.
Perhaps Mark meant that Jesus was angry with the "demon" of leprosy, not the leper?
The disciples didn't understand because God didn't want them to understand 🙏
Well that seems like a bad plan
@@WayneBraackit happened the way it happened.
When did the commercials start. 1st time in a year they appear for me.
Unfortunately UA-cam automatically adds tons of ad breaks as soon as the lecture ends. We go and remove most of them as soon as we can. We always leave 2 or 3 ad breaks per lecture because this is one of the main sources of income for the channel since we don't have a pay wall.
I wouldn't want to be associated with Jesus either after he was arrested in a park with a naked boy (Mark 14:51,52). claiming not to be a pirate/human trafficker. And I think Pontius might have gotten it right, and when I revisit these stories with the perspective of Jesus being guilty person, who comes across as a highly educated in philosophy, with knowledge of medicine/drugs, seeing Jesus as a con man healer who manipulated the poor, the lost, the prostitutes and the sick with knowledge, secrecy, drugs and antidotes, the stories and miracles make more sense to me as plausible. So my question would be, is there any evidence that supports Pontius and his case? Super rough question I know but I can't help but wonder
Creating Christ is a very compelling book/documentary
50:00
Comment
Burn a piece of toast; I am there
Who those asian soldiers in picture
*Original.
I'll look later. I'm serious
Ok I'll b unobtrusively graceful
Christ is LORD
Anger in Christ's response was due to the misplaced healing request. God Almighty is the sole source of power and healing. Inspite of His teaching folks were approaching him for prayers request. This dependency on others than God Almighty what Christ was looking to break
Are you talking about the story where Jesus doesn't want to heal a little girl because of his prejudices against Gentiles?
No a leper.@@sparrowthesissy2186
John, stop beating around the bush.
Non dualistic Jesus is what you must explore.
so wrong yeshua never was crucified read more
Can you use punctuation please? Defining your sentence depends on it.
This river to the sea Palestine will be free professor is confused about life, truth and consequences.
No, disagree. Sounds like you're upside down though.
I love Gnostic Jesus because he is evil and sinister