It's quite intriguing seeing your work with the Crown Cooler based design. I also had problems with the air not being evenly distributed between the outlets, as I think the geometry that directs the airflow isquite sensetive to printing inaccuracies. Are you satisfied with your UFO design as is?
Some others will be testing it soon. So far, I have had to decrease cooling % using this duct, and by quite a bit. I don't have a lot of time on it, but from some speed tests it seems to have better overall coverage/°360 air. Time will tell.
@@MrRocksalt It is more watchable, and with a little bit of additional initial set up, actually more filmable(if that's a word) than what this is that you did.
@@dandcc9192 It being a 22 minute print, I didn't bother to post the whole video. Instead I posted some speed and a follow up video of the final product, listed in the description. Just playing around.
@@MrRocksalt "It being a 22 minute print, I didn't bother to post the whole video" you don't notice how it sounds like a problem a time-lapse would have solved?
@@dandcc9192 No, not really. With time-lapse you are not getting the feel/look of the speed vs quality. I guess some prefer your idea and others don't. Don't assume everyone has the same viewpoint.
That second layer speed, So brutal 😍
It's quite intriguing seeing your work with the Crown Cooler based design. I also had problems with the air not being evenly distributed between the outlets, as I think the geometry that directs the airflow isquite sensetive to printing inaccuracies. Are you satisfied with your UFO design as is?
Some others will be testing it soon. So far, I have had to decrease cooling % using this duct, and by quite a bit. I don't have a lot of time on it, but from some speed tests it seems to have better overall coverage/°360 air. Time will tell.
There is a reason why people film timelapse for 3D prints.
What is the reason?
@@MrRocksalt It is more watchable, and with a little bit of additional initial set up, actually more filmable(if that's a word) than what this is that you did.
@@dandcc9192 It being a 22 minute print, I didn't bother to post the whole video. Instead I posted some speed and a follow up video of the final product, listed in the description. Just playing around.
@@MrRocksalt "It being a 22 minute print, I didn't bother to post the whole video" you don't notice how it sounds like a problem a time-lapse would have solved?
@@dandcc9192 No, not really. With time-lapse you are not getting the feel/look of the speed vs quality. I guess some prefer your idea and others don't. Don't assume everyone has the same viewpoint.
2504s?
Yes, They sure are powerful motors moving this much mass! But they do resonate in the 75-175mms range.