The making of an exponential Diophantine equation.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 52

  • @hydraslair4723
    @hydraslair4723 2 роки тому +52

    I love these "make your own problem" style videos! They give twice as much insight on problems

  • @abrahammekonnen
    @abrahammekonnen 2 роки тому +19

    These problem building videos are really interesting because they force us to see math from a different perspective.
    As usual this video was pretty great.

  • @pajrc1234
    @pajrc1234 2 роки тому +10

    You can also eliminate 2*28 by seeing that since one is 3^a-5^b and the other is 3^a+5^b, their difference must be twice a power of 5, which only applies to 4*14

  • @romajimamulo
    @romajimamulo 2 роки тому +27

    10:02 15 is divisible by 3, it's not a power of three though

    • @machineman8920
      @machineman8920 2 роки тому +15

      That's what they want you to think

    • @terryendicott2939
      @terryendicott2939 2 роки тому +13

      Only if you want to be rational about it.

    • @wannabeactuary01
      @wannabeactuary01 2 роки тому +3

      But to be fair, you, I and most of the viewers spotted that and knew what was meant if we were paying attention.

  • @stkhan1945
    @stkhan1945 2 роки тому +1

    ..michael penn ...always a joy to watch your math content.. thnq

  • @goodplacetostop2973
    @goodplacetostop2973 2 роки тому +15

    10:47

  • @Roshkin
    @Roshkin 2 роки тому +7

    I believe you mean power not mulitple at the end for 3^a = 15

  • @noproof7376
    @noproof7376 2 роки тому +3

    Thank you Michael Penn, you are a legend

  • @SR-ml4dn
    @SR-ml4dn 2 роки тому

    Thanks Michael Penn, your videos are always very educational. I didn't know the fact or having thought about adding or subtracting even numbers and they then become odd numbers. Diophantine solving for the right polynomials occurs quite often in solving adaptive controllers for control purpose.

  • @pauliusasvydis2121
    @pauliusasvydis2121 2 роки тому +1

    You can also get that m,n are even by checking mod 4, in general for any exponential diophantine equation checking mod 3, mod 4 usually gives some interesting results.

    • @pauliusasvydis2121
      @pauliusasvydis2121 2 роки тому +1

      Oops, checking mod 4 only gives you that m is even, mod 8 is still needed. My bad

  • @manucitomx
    @manucitomx 2 роки тому +2

    Thank you, professor!

  • @Pfs7850
    @Pfs7850 2 роки тому +1

    #6:31 why is m=4a+1 and n=4b+3 not a posibility?

    • @RexxSchneider
      @RexxSchneider 2 роки тому

      Because if m = 4a+1, then 3^m = 3^(4a).3 = 3.81^a ≡ 3.1^a ≡ 3 (mod 8) for all natural numbers a.
      Whereas 5^n = 5^(4b+3) = 5^(4b).125 = 125.625^b ≡ 5.1^b ≡ 5 (mod 8) for all natural numbers b.
      So you can never have 3^(4a+1) equal to 5^(4b+3) for any natural numbers a, b.
      It can only work if a and b are even, which is a necessary (but not sufficient) condition.

    • @Pfs7850
      @Pfs7850 2 роки тому

      Yes, I see this now. Maybe I should change ny glasses. :-)

  • @sunilsheth826
    @sunilsheth826 2 роки тому

    just learnt how problems are generated! very nice presentation.

  • @hassanalihusseini1717
    @hassanalihusseini1717 2 роки тому

    Thank you for this inspiring video! It is good to see how to build some exercises.

  • @kenbrady119
    @kenbrady119 2 роки тому +4

    New merchandising idea: shirts with sleeves that can be used as erasers!

  • @tonyg5433
    @tonyg5433 2 роки тому

    This channel made me realize just how much math I don't understand. I don't think I've seen a single video in which I could have solved the problem on my own.

  • @mcwulf25
    @mcwulf25 2 роки тому +4

    This looks like fun. No need to hunt number theory problems any more - just make my own 😁

  • @jamesfortune243
    @jamesfortune243 2 роки тому +1

    Well posed!

  • @roboarjun
    @roboarjun 2 місяці тому

    but this only works if the equation is made to have even solutions. how about something like 2 + 5^m = 7^n how do we solve that.

  • @juanpablosimonetti147
    @juanpablosimonetti147 2 роки тому +2

    Me encantó que propusieras este video enseñando a armar problemas. Muchas Gracias!
    I loved that you proposed this video teaching how to set up problems. Thank you very much!

  • @zepetogulce6236
    @zepetogulce6236 2 роки тому

    thank you.

  • @iconjack
    @iconjack 2 роки тому

    9:52 *power

  • @nadermaleklou3666
    @nadermaleklou3666 2 роки тому

    Nice video as always
    In some equations , we need to check the remainder on division by sth . How does the person who makes the problem know which polynomials or numbers give us unique answer or contradiction ?

  • @KarlDeux
    @KarlDeux 2 роки тому

    9:54, not a power of 3, but a multiple anyway.

  • @piotrtrzcinski3878
    @piotrtrzcinski3878 2 роки тому +2

    I really hoped for a proof that exponentiation is Diophantine

  • @ChiangKaiSheksBrother
    @ChiangKaiSheksBrother 2 роки тому +3

    Michael Penn, your videos are amazing!
    Now's a good place to stop this comment.

  • @user-cv1jb9xv2p
    @user-cv1jb9xv2p 2 роки тому +1

    Sweet

  • @user-cv1jb9xv2p
    @user-cv1jb9xv2p 2 роки тому +2

    🙏🏼👍🏼👍🏼

  • @snehasismaiti342
    @snehasismaiti342 2 роки тому +1

    Can anyone solve this for me:- Show that there are infinitely many pairs (a,b) of coprime integers (which may be negative, but not zero) such that x^2 + ax + b = 0 and x^2 + 2ax + b have integral roots.

    • @matteobianchi2038
      @matteobianchi2038 2 роки тому +2

      Basically you try to find a relation between a and b(in particular try to express b as a function of a) so that the statement is true. I found that for odd a b(a) = - (a²-9)(a²-1)/16

    • @IanXMiller
      @IanXMiller 2 роки тому +1

      For integer p the functions: x²+(2p+1)x-(p-1)p(p+1)(p+2)=0 has roots: x=-p²-2p and x=p²-1 whilst x²+2(2p+1)x-(p-1)p(p+1)(p+2)=0 has roots: x=-p²-3p-2 and x=p(p-1). Still need to show there are infinitely many ( 2p+1 , -(p-1)p(p+1)(p+2) ) which are co-prime.

  • @xizar0rg
    @xizar0rg 2 роки тому +2

    It's nice to see another video with a meaningful title.

  • @adambory1630
    @adambory1630 2 роки тому +1

    Have you run out of tasks? Then create your own one.

  • @meestyouyouestme3753
    @meestyouyouestme3753 2 роки тому

    I don't know if it's because (to me) you look like Neil Patrick or because you are a great explainer but i love your videos! Thanks for making the boring interesting!

  • @playgroundgames3667
    @playgroundgames3667 2 роки тому

    n = 1/2, m = 2/2

  • @rafael7696
    @rafael7696 2 роки тому

    I miss olympiad probkemms

  • @ratandmonkey2982
    @ratandmonkey2982 2 роки тому +1

    lectures 6 & 7 need to be added to the linear algebra playlist

  • @lucachiesura5191
    @lucachiesura5191 2 роки тому

    In an other way: n satisfies the equation if n >or = m/2, because 3^x-5^(x/2)-56 is an increasing function that is zero only if x = 4, and also n < or = m -2, because 3^x-5^(x-1)-56 is negative so the only solution seems to be m = 4... the better way seems the other...

  • @c8h182
    @c8h182 2 роки тому

    Hmmm is this 2.th comment ?

  • @ЄвгеніяШеменьова
    @ЄвгеніяШеменьова 2 роки тому +2

    Здається,це легко, дякую 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦

  • @jackkingsby116
    @jackkingsby116 2 роки тому

    Why did I click on this?

  • @jettzheng2791
    @jettzheng2791 2 роки тому

    The scattered blade spindly hover because polo metabolically saw absent a quizzical withdrawal. spiritual, innate zoo

  • @mariaaurorab.marcos6465
    @mariaaurorab.marcos6465 2 роки тому

    LOL silly