Toyman, boring is what we saw at North Wilkesboro last week and what we’re seeing in this 1972 Bristol race. Racing is about lead changes not horsepower. 57 lead changes in 500 miles is infinitely better than what you’re fsvoring
@@davidcapp8851 - NASCAR is an extremely ironic competition nowadays. NASCAR was founded so people could see NORMAL CARS race, it was the counterpoint to open-wheelers and sports cars. Now? They're tremendously expensive prototypes. If we're being strict, NASCAR should just no longer exist. Wanna know of a very similar case? Flat track racing. Flat track racing (dirt oval racing with motorbikes) was created against speedway racing. While speedway bikes were prototypes without gears or even brakes, flat track bikes were modified streetbikes. Just like with NASCAR, flat track no longer offers the possibility to race anything similar to a streetbike. And then you have the race lengths. Back in the day longer races made sense: they were good entertainment for a few hours (you'd see plenty of cars change pace during the race) plus a great test of men and their machines (lots of engine failures, health problems and such). Now? Every single car could probably do 2000 miles without much issue and the pace is very consistent all race long. The top5 is the same after 15 minutes and after 3 hours.
I love being able to recognize the vehicles because they still resemble their street counterparts..and there were still Mercurys running. All this needed was a few AMCs out there.
my NASCAR sweet spot; 1968-73 for me. I loved the Mopars of the late 60's - early 70's> Even the Torinos and Chevys looked bad ass!! Id love if they could run NASCAR using cars from all the decades, incorporated into the year. Where they would run a certain year class of cars for that race. I know im dreaming, but would be so cool.
Yes. It was just another short track and really didn’t amount to much. It changed owners in the 1970s then the 1980s then in 1996; by that point Winston money and the surging popularity of the series made it more popular
I'm on the total opposite, it makes them unwatchable. Every single sound in those videos is canned. The cheers, the engines, the slides, the banging... I find insane that even in the early 1970s they weren't bringing sound recording gear to these events.
@DanArnets1492 I hear ya. I'm sure alot of folks feel the same. Lol. And I probably should've quoted that better. What I meant is I think it's funny because it's so tacky and nothing like the actual sounds at a track. I certainly am not a fan of it. Lol
One of my favorite tracks. First one was when Darrell was going for 8 in a row at Bristol. Think about that he had won 7 straight races at Bristol 3500 laps at that beast. Saw about 5 or 6 races in the 80's . One hell if a time.
These cars look like they're crawling around here compared to the action there today. Still amazing to see these guys wrestle these cars for over 250 miles.
Meanwhile, on similar tracks throughout Wisconsin and i assume all across america, gorgeous camaros, Mustangs and firebirds raced each other fender to fender in hotly contested 50-100 lap features where the norm saw at least top 5 finishers on the lead lap and all were going for it lol. THANKS FOR the POST
The catalog of names here is phenomenal. About 847... "Richard Childress spins out". And Bobby Isaak (71) isn't such the familiar name, but in the vids from these years, show he sure could run with the best of them! Thanks for posting, awesome to see the pure roots of NASCAR in it's golden days.
Bobby Isaac was the 1970 NASCAR Champion, fastest man to lap Talladega and holder of 28 land speed records at Bonneville. Check it out - ua-cam.com/video/qiYffIWUlSI/v-deo.html
Whoa! Wasnt much to BMS,in that year of 72. I live just about quarter of a mile away from it,and it really stands out from the landscape now! It truely does look like a collisseium from the Volunteer Parkway! Magestic indeed!
Wow, time has gone so fast, I remember the first time I went to Richmond as a kid and I believe it was Allison's Matador that I got to look at up close hmm, I don't remember exactly when it was though but never will forget it. My older brother took me with him for three practice session which was free to watch.
I've Accepted This Is As Close As I'm Gettin to a "Time Machine" These Old Racin vids I Remember so much Good Family Times Growin up in Western North Carolina Wilkesboro things Somehow connected or Relative to the Looming Excitement of the Race a Race & Sunday Dinner of Course .. but for Nothing else than to Hear Barney Hall MRN. Racing Radio I'd bet if Anyone else listened to the race on MRN & Where Drivin Bk from Sunday Dinner @ Grandma's even if you where Drivin a Log Truck you Felt You were actually Driving in the Race ..that was a Great Announcer !! THANKS FOR THE UPLOAD !! Cause this is what I want to Remember The Fun the Camaraderie Rivalry the Ball's to Say it ain't called Cheatin till U, get Caught the Humble Beginnings a Blue Collar Workin Man's Sport Now Opposite What WE ALL Had Before Corporate America Changed things to fit a G.M's Narrative that's grown-up being Chauffeured around Hey Or She May Have Got There Kicks But it Wasn't From Runnin 120 mph on a Twisted Mountain Road..Just Sayin Now My Soapbox is RET.. PEACE ALL..
Sorry, Jeff, but all engine sounds you hear in this video are 100% canned. You need to watch the few live and semi-live broadcasts from this area to hear REAL engine sounds.
Always found that surname hilarious. "Moroso" is the Spanish word for someone who isn't following their debt payments correctly, doesn't matter if it's too slow or just not paying entirely. He must've come from a very "interesting" family, hahaha.
@Adcox Robert No. If that were the case then you would have seen more independents running GM during factory backing of Ford, Mopar; GM struck quickly after Ford pulled out with and you quickly saw teams of aero Laguna S-3's, Pontiac's, Oldsmobile's. Look at top three cars running 1,2,3 at '79 Daytona 500. Mopar was practically bankrupt.
@Adcox Robert this race is in '72 not '64, ends with announcer saying "Allison wins, starting Chevy down the come back trail" which relates to what I was saying about GM not heavily involved in competition, then coming back in strongly. Petty was good but Pearson owned him with more victories in head to head competition with him. Had Pearson selected to run full seasons and all races, Pearson would have accumulated many championships, so Petty didn't dominate anything statistically against the Silver Fox.
@Adcox Robert Saying Petty is better than Pearson is like saying Wilt Chamberlain was better than Bill Russell. Sure, Chamberlain has the numbers. But Chamberlain couldn’t get past Russell in the 1960s in games that actually mattered, namely championships and playoff series. If Pearson, like Russell, cared enough to go after Chamberlain’s records, he would have broken them. But he didn’t, because, in Pearson’s case, he didn’t want to be on the road away from his family for 30-plus weekends for over 30 years. If he had, those big Petty numbers definitely would not exist.
Who says Pearson couldn’t win on short tracks? The fact is that the money wasn’t there and Pearson and the Wood brothers were business savvy. Why waste resources for chump change? Cheers
Racing coverage back then was miserable though. Only 15-20 races would get any coverage at all, sometimes as short as 3 minutes. The first NASCAR Cup season to be half-broadcasted was in the early 80s and it wasn't until a few years later that the NASCAR Cup series first got the full season full race treatment.
426 hemi's 427 Chevy & the 427 side oiler FE ford, the last of the muscle car era! And the gas war's that let us young men buy up these gas guzzlers, drive down I 95 over 135mph . O the fun passing a city cop car on a 2 lane blacktop,
They had less weight than the 429, so the cars handled better on this track and saved the tires David Pearson drove a de-strocked 427 in 1968 with 396ci and 2x4 carb setup
@@goldenltd1970 Nope. 429 weighs around 600# while the 427 FE weighs about 650#. 429 is lighter due to the aluminium heads, magnesium oil pan and thinner wall casting. You are correct that in 1968 the Ford teams destroked the 427 to 390, just as the Chrysler teams destroked the 426 to 404 but you didn't tell us why... So I will. It was due to 1968 NASCAR rule of 9.36# per CI, resulting in the 396 CID car weighing in around 3706# vs the 427 CID which would have to weigh in around 4000#.
@@goldenltd1970 Yep. The 429 was hard to tune and was only pulling around 580 HP, same as the 427 FE, unless a lot of work was put into it. And it was expensive, compared to the 427s many Ford shops had sitting around - roushyates.wordpress.com/tag/nascar/
The cars had way less durability in those days. There were more mechanical breakdowns and a ton of blown engines. So several of the competitive cars would end up with a DNF each week.
Was watching one of these early 70’s videos of a Charlotte race where Bobby Allison was leading, Donnie Allison was racing him hard in second, but was A LAP DOWN(!), and the third place car was 2 laps down!
i was at both bristol races that year as well as both atlanta races. Bobby won them all!! i though gee this is easy , all i have to do is show up an bobby wins!
A.B.C. on Early Saturday or Sunday afternoon before The Big Shows and I was right in front of The Colored Big Screen I wanted to be A Race Car Driver and Stunt driver and truck driver.
Yeah let's throw a caution for tires after 20 laps, hey let's give a " lucky dog", better yet let's start all over in 3 segments, now that's real racing ain't it. Lmao
@@jcearnhardt393 And don't forget, there was no closing pit road in those days. You could pit any time you wanted and they only started 30 cars in this race which allows the field to spread out. Notice how they didn't crash every few laps and throw a caution like the modern Bristol.
Exactly, Greek and Hillbilly. They didn't manipulate things to keep cars from being lapped. No wave arounds, free passes, competition yellows, and all that BS. Plus the cars broke down and blew engines often, which was another reason few cars would finish on the lead lap.
The good news nowadaze is that the entire field HAS TIRES to change over ti. Over half of the field in this race deliberately nursed the tires they had
@@electrolytics It is really just a markeing tool. The Southeastern 500 sounds better than the Southeastern 250. So some events are calculated on miles and some on laps. IndyCar did the same thing with the Firehawk 600 at Texas. It was 600 KM (actual race distance was 373 miles).
Race length numbers in American racing can be laps, kilometers (often have a K behind them) or miles. · Bristol 500 races are like ¿266? miles · Phoenix 500k races are 312 miles · Daytona 500 races are actually 500 miles Also, remember that all oval tracks are not measured on the inside line (athletics and velodromes) OR the average between inside and outside line like most roadcourses. They measure them about 10-20ft from the outside wall. Nobody has ever done 500 miles in Daytona or Indy on a single race (outside those race-extending GWC finishes, I guess).
Hot Wheels in the floor on front porch steps dirty some times have to wash them all Tok Trucks and everything from yard drinking Ting and Sugar and Kool Aid.
Robert Hendrickson I’ve been a race fan for better than 50 years. I’ve not seen good racing for nearly 20 years except on small town bull rings and dirt tracks.
I remember this race well, because "I WAS THERE!". lived about 30 miles from Bristol in elk park,N.C. THIS IS AWESOME!!!
I miss this the REAL NASCAR” bring back old nascar back !!!!!
It was boring af back then
You wanna see 3 laps separate each position? Ok then...
@@godfathertrucking8918 Really, Boring is a bunch of cars being starved for Horsepower and looking like a freeway backup.
Toyman, boring is what we saw at North Wilkesboro last week and what we’re seeing in this 1972 Bristol race. Racing is about lead changes not horsepower. 57 lead changes in 500 miles is infinitely better than what you’re fsvoring
Back when cars were cars, drivers were drivers and racing was racing!
So what would you call it now?
Especially when back then Bristol couldn’t pay that much (hence smaller fields) and the racing there wasn’t particularly competitive,
@@davidcapp8851 - NASCAR is an extremely ironic competition nowadays. NASCAR was founded so people could see NORMAL CARS race, it was the counterpoint to open-wheelers and sports cars. Now? They're tremendously expensive prototypes. If we're being strict, NASCAR should just no longer exist.
Wanna know of a very similar case? Flat track racing. Flat track racing (dirt oval racing with motorbikes) was created against speedway racing. While speedway bikes were prototypes without gears or even brakes, flat track bikes were modified streetbikes. Just like with NASCAR, flat track no longer offers the possibility to race anything similar to a streetbike.
And then you have the race lengths. Back in the day longer races made sense: they were good entertainment for a few hours (you'd see plenty of cars change pace during the race) plus a great test of men and their machines (lots of engine failures, health problems and such). Now? Every single car could probably do 2000 miles without much issue and the pace is very consistent all race long. The top5 is the same after 15 minutes and after 3 hours.
Back when 1-2 drivers died per season 🤩
It's amazing how these tracks have changed over the years. Thanks for the great videos
Great video! When racing, was still racing! Thank you!
I love being able to recognize the vehicles because they still resemble their street counterparts..and there were still Mercurys running. All this needed was a few AMCs out there.
Only caveat is they’re all Coke bottle bodies. Which are great bodies but not all that different Chevrolet to Dodge
my NASCAR sweet spot; 1968-73 for me. I loved the Mopars of the late 60's - early 70's> Even the Torinos and Chevys looked bad ass!!
Id love if they could run NASCAR using cars from all the decades, incorporated into the year. Where they would run a certain year class of cars for that race. I know im dreaming, but would be so cool.
Bristol is such a fascinating track.
Yes. It was just another short track and really didn’t amount to much. It changed owners in the 1970s then the 1980s then in 1996; by that point Winston money and the surging popularity of the series made it more popular
I love it! Richard Petty experimenting with power steering. Today. They can’t drive the car when it goes out!!
Thanks so much for posting this. I could just sit and watch these old races for days.
I love the "canned crashing noise " they play in these old videos. It sounds just like the crashes in the old movies or an episode of CHIPS! 😁
I'm on the total opposite, it makes them unwatchable. Every single sound in those videos is canned. The cheers, the engines, the slides, the banging... I find insane that even in the early 1970s they weren't bringing sound recording gear to these events.
@DanArnets1492 I hear ya. I'm sure alot of folks feel the same. Lol. And I probably should've quoted that better. What I meant is I think it's funny because it's so tacky and nothing like the actual sounds at a track. I certainly am not a fan of it. Lol
One of my favorite tracks. First one was when Darrell was going for 8 in a row at Bristol. Think about that he had won 7 straight races at Bristol 3500 laps at that beast. Saw about 5 or 6 races in the 80's . One hell if a time.
5:53 I think this is the first video footage I've seen of Henley Grey's 1971 Thunderbird in action. Not a fast car, but it looked cool!
These cars look like they're crawling around here compared to the action there today. Still amazing to see these guys wrestle these cars for over 250 miles.
Thank you for posting this race. Lots of great family entertainment. Lots of fun memories ❤😊
Meanwhile, on similar tracks throughout Wisconsin and i assume all across america, gorgeous camaros, Mustangs and firebirds raced each other fender to fender in hotly contested 50-100 lap features where the norm saw at least top 5 finishers on the lead lap and all were going for it lol. THANKS FOR the POST
The catalog of names here is phenomenal. About 847... "Richard Childress spins out".
And Bobby Isaak (71) isn't such the familiar name, but in the vids from these years, show he sure could run with the best of them! Thanks for posting, awesome to see the pure roots of NASCAR in it's golden days.
Bobby Isaac was the 1970 NASCAR Champion, fastest man to lap Talladega and holder of 28 land speed records at Bonneville. Check it out - ua-cam.com/video/qiYffIWUlSI/v-deo.html
Issac was a heck of a driver! I believe he’s buried in a cemetery that overlooks Hickory, NC Speedway.
7:16 - Pit crew member sloshing the fuel into the tank while chomping on a cigar LOL
As badass as that would be, upon closer inspection I believe it's actually the handle of the fuel can...
Chris Arroyo I believe u r right
@@chrisarroyo1431 for sure..note 1:07 ; Bobby Isaak climbing in chomping on a smoke.
Bud Lindemann what an Icon in his era... one of a kind...
Whoa! Wasnt much to BMS,in that year of 72. I live just about quarter of a mile away from it,and it really stands out from the landscape now! It truely does look like a collisseium from the Volunteer Parkway! Magestic indeed!
“These Rebels…..” I love this man.
It's a way to not call them "Southerners", it's 100% a Civil War reference
Great picture guy's. Thanks
Wow, time has gone so fast, I remember the first time I went to Richmond as a kid and I believe it was Allison's Matador that I got to look at up close hmm, I don't remember exactly when it was though but never will forget it. My older brother took me with him for three practice session which was free to watch.
I haven't seen C&T in 25 yrs. Good stuff.
Loven that cool background music 😄
Enjoyed this.
Check out the people in the stands...you will never see that again at a nascar race...damn shame...
I've Accepted This Is As Close As I'm Gettin to a "Time Machine" These Old Racin vids I Remember so much Good Family Times Growin up in Western North Carolina Wilkesboro things Somehow connected or Relative to the Looming Excitement of the Race a Race & Sunday Dinner of Course .. but for Nothing else than to Hear Barney Hall MRN. Racing Radio I'd bet if Anyone else listened to the race on MRN & Where Drivin Bk from Sunday Dinner @ Grandma's even if you where Drivin a Log Truck you Felt You were actually Driving in the Race ..that was a Great Announcer !! THANKS FOR THE UPLOAD !! Cause this is what I want to Remember The Fun the Camaraderie Rivalry the Ball's to Say it ain't called Cheatin till U, get Caught the Humble Beginnings a Blue Collar Workin Man's Sport Now Opposite What WE ALL Had Before Corporate America Changed things to fit a G.M's Narrative that's grown-up being Chauffeured around Hey Or She May Have Got There Kicks But it Wasn't From Runnin 120 mph on a Twisted Mountain Road..Just Sayin Now My Soapbox is RET.. PEACE ALL..
Way cool video..... can't help but wonder what rear ratios were these guys using, maybe 5.88's ??
So great to see such a variety of cars, isn't it ??
This is when Bristol was asphalt, which is why the track was wider. The banking was not 36 degrees either, but more like 24 degrees.
I'm your huckleberry. i miss the days of pearson petty allison Yarbrough
Bobby Allison, the true GOAT
Speedvision 😍😍😍😍😍😍😁
ahahahahaha, Petty is cheating!!! He is "experimenting" with this new thing called "power steering"
What is Petty driving? A Road Runner?
Real nascar! I miss it!
Friday Hassler had been gone 2 months when this race was run
Love the roar of those big blocks!!
Sorry, Jeff, but all engine sounds you hear in this video are 100% canned. You need to watch the few live and semi-live broadcasts from this area to hear REAL engine sounds.
Damn, Bristol looked a lot different back then.
preferred the old Bristol track, before "progressive banking"
You mean before concrete
@@STP43FAN1 no, Bristol in the 90's
Great video
What did a ticket cost back in those days, couple of bucks? Now it's over 100 for a decent seat and I don't know that the racing is any better now
They were $5 and up....
There’s a lot more passing now since the switch in the corners after 2009
I love them spraying water into the radiator during pit stops.
My brothers and I use to play out by the chicken barn while my Dad worked with Junior on that very car. At the time Dad was working for Dick Moroso.
Is your Dad still around?
@@Road2redemtion no he is gone he lived to be 100. He was a very intelligent man.
@@jaymartin4166 wow, that's incredible.
Always found that surname hilarious. "Moroso" is the Spanish word for someone who isn't following their debt payments correctly, doesn't matter if it's too slow or just not paying entirely. He must've come from a very "interesting" family, hahaha.
I'm a Mopar man and I grew up watching these races back when the Hemi's dominated
Most of the races I've seen from this golden era were won by FoMoCo, and GM was nowhere to be found until about the timeframe of this race.
@Adcox Robert No. If that were the case then you would have seen more independents running GM during factory backing of Ford, Mopar; GM struck quickly after Ford pulled out with and you quickly saw teams of aero Laguna S-3's, Pontiac's, Oldsmobile's. Look at top three cars running 1,2,3 at '79 Daytona 500. Mopar was practically bankrupt.
@Adcox Robert this race is in '72 not '64, ends with announcer saying "Allison wins, starting Chevy down the come back trail" which relates to what I was saying about GM not heavily involved in competition, then coming back in strongly. Petty was good but Pearson owned him with more victories in head to head competition with him. Had Pearson selected to run full seasons and all races, Pearson would have accumulated many championships, so Petty didn't dominate anything statistically against the Silver Fox.
@Adcox Robert Saying Petty is better than Pearson is like saying Wilt Chamberlain was better than Bill Russell. Sure, Chamberlain has the numbers. But Chamberlain couldn’t get past Russell in the 1960s in games that actually mattered, namely championships and playoff series. If Pearson, like Russell, cared enough to go after Chamberlain’s records, he would have broken them. But he didn’t, because, in Pearson’s case, he didn’t want to be on the road away from his family for 30-plus weekends for over 30 years. If he had, those big Petty numbers definitely would not exist.
Who says Pearson couldn’t win on short tracks? The fact is that the money wasn’t there and Pearson and the Wood brothers were business savvy. Why waste resources for chump change?
Cheers
I was absolutely born in the wrong era...😕
Racing coverage back then was miserable though. Only 15-20 races would get any coverage at all, sometimes as short as 3 minutes. The first NASCAR Cup season to be half-broadcasted was in the early 80s and it wasn't until a few years later that the NASCAR Cup series first got the full season full race treatment.
7000 dollars big money back then
Not really, if the 2 more popular inflation calculators are right, 7000 dollars in 1972 would be only FIFTY THOUSAND dollars in 2023
OLD NASCAR 🇧🇷👏📹🎥
This was, when Richard Petty became The King...
What year did they quit using factory frames and go to tube chassis?
In 1972 Bob Allison was my hero. Go Chevrolet
I like the 43 car, as usual.
426 hemi's 427 Chevy & the 427 side oiler FE ford, the last of the muscle car era! And the gas war's that let us young men buy up these gas guzzlers, drive down I 95 over 135mph .
O the fun passing a city cop car on a 2 lane blacktop,
Why were the FORDS running out of production 427's in 1972?
They had less weight than the 429, so the cars handled better on this track and saved the tires
David Pearson drove a de-strocked 427 in 1968 with 396ci and 2x4 carb setup
because they were running 429"s
@@rexspangler4641 but some cars have 427 on the hood. Maybe smaller teams and private drivers?
@@goldenltd1970 Nope. 429 weighs around 600# while the 427 FE weighs about 650#. 429 is lighter due to the aluminium heads, magnesium oil pan and thinner wall casting.
You are correct that in 1968 the Ford teams destroked the 427 to 390, just as the Chrysler teams destroked the 426 to 404 but you didn't tell us why...
So I will. It was due to 1968 NASCAR rule of 9.36# per CI, resulting in the 396 CID car weighing in around 3706# vs the 427 CID which would have to weigh in around 4000#.
@@goldenltd1970 Yep. The 429 was hard to tune and was only pulling around 580 HP, same as the 427 FE, unless a lot of work was put into it. And it was expensive, compared to the 427s many Ford shops had sitting around - roushyates.wordpress.com/tag/nascar/
catfishing and Nascar: the way i was raised here in South Carolina.
Speedvision was king.
Wow bristol looks different
Tenth place was FORTY EIGHT laps behind. FORTY EIGHT
But people want it to go back to that. Lol
@@Grim_Prospects Hahaha, well, i think i wouldnt mind 😁
The cars had way less durability in those days. There were more mechanical breakdowns and a ton of blown engines. So several of the competitive cars would end up with a DNF each week.
Yep. Most guys had one car and 2 races a week. And kids to feed. Others had factory backing, at least 5 cars....
Was watching one of these early 70’s videos of a Charlotte race where Bobby Allison was leading, Donnie Allison was racing him hard in second, but was A LAP DOWN(!), and the third place car was 2 laps down!
Looks like a sellout! They didn't need stage racing and a stupid playoffs to create artificial excitement. These were real cars with real drivers!
Did Co Co Marlin's Monte Carlo have a hood ornament on it?
You probably saw one of the hood pins.
i was at both bristol races that year as well as both atlanta races. Bobby won them all!! i though gee this is easy , all i have to do is show up an bobby wins!
Nothing like big block power!
God I miss the old Bristol, back before they ruined it.
It’s not high bank anymore it’s not fun anymore
It’s still high banked.
It's actually higher banked TODAY than it was in the 1970s!
Motor Speedway Of The South
A.B.C. on Early Saturday or Sunday afternoon before The Big Shows and I was right in front of The Colored Big Screen I wanted to be A Race Car Driver and Stunt driver and truck driver.
Second place was 4 laps back, 3rd was ninelaps, forth was SEVENTEEN, fifth was TWENTY SIX laps back. Racing my ass.
Yeah let's throw a caution for tires after 20 laps, hey let's give a " lucky dog", better yet let's start all over in 3 segments, now that's real racing ain't it. Lmao
@@jcearnhardt393 And don't forget, there was no closing pit road in those days. You could pit any time you wanted and they only started 30 cars in this race which allows the field to spread out. Notice how they didn't crash every few laps and throw a caution like the modern Bristol.
Exactly, Greek and Hillbilly. They didn't manipulate things to keep cars from being lapped. No wave arounds, free passes, competition yellows, and all that BS. Plus the cars broke down and blew engines often, which was another reason few cars would finish on the lead lap.
The good news nowadaze is that the entire field HAS TIRES to change over ti. Over half of the field in this race deliberately nursed the tires they had
Get out of the car! I’m (!!!!) going to drive it to victory! 🏁 That’s what I (!) told em when I (!!!) was there. And so it was.
Looks like Salem
Winner takes about $50,000 in todays money.
Wouldn't it be a 1000 laps for a "500" race? Half-mile track.
I looked it up...it's 500 laps. So in Nascar the "500" means 500 laps regardless of track length?
@@electrolytics It is really just a markeing tool. The Southeastern 500 sounds better than the Southeastern 250. So some events are calculated on miles and some on laps. IndyCar did the same thing with the Firehawk 600 at Texas. It was 600 KM (actual race distance was 373 miles).
@@HODIUSDUDE Gotcha. Thanks. Like this old footage.
Any driver running 1,000 laps at Bristol would have to be extricated from the driver's seat and shuttled directly to the chiropractor.
Race length numbers in American racing can be laps, kilometers (often have a K behind them) or miles.
· Bristol 500 races are like ¿266? miles
· Phoenix 500k races are 312 miles
· Daytona 500 races are actually 500 miles
Also, remember that all oval tracks are not measured on the inside line (athletics and velodromes) OR the average between inside and outside line like most roadcourses. They measure them about 10-20ft from the outside wall. Nobody has ever done 500 miles in Daytona or Indy on a single race (outside those race-extending GWC finishes, I guess).
Hot Wheels in the floor on front porch steps dirty some times have to wash them all Tok Trucks and everything from yard drinking Ting and Sugar and Kool Aid.
back before they ruined the track
Bobby allison coke Chevy first poster in my room
I love the cars but the racing was not as good as todays.
Robert Hendrickson I’ve been a race fan for better than 50 years. I’ve not seen good racing for nearly 20 years except on small town bull rings and dirt tracks.
Had That 72 Monte Carlo That Bobby Allison For 35yrs. SOLD IN 2020 Bought 1985 Best Car I Every Had