Silicon Carbide - The subtle REVOLUTION

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 лип 2020
  • Subject Zero Patreon
    / subjectzerolaboratories
    Software's used:
    Blender 2.8x
    Apple Motion
    mObject
    Silicon Carbide - The subtle REVOLUTION
    SiC is as important as battery technologies. It enables huge reductions in power loss for example, in a MOSFET diode, SiC makes it easier to achieve a thinner drift layer because of its critical breaking strength that can be a much as 10x higher than that of silicon.
    This results in less electrical resistance, culminating in up to 70% reduction in conduction and switching losses at high voltages.
    And high voltage we are talking about as high as 2,500 kV/cm while for silicon you are looking at most 300 kV/cm. This is possible because of its excellent thermal conductivity that is 3.2 times higher at 4.9 W/cm.K against 1.5.
    Lastly the band gap, depending on the polytype, can be almost 3 times higher at 3.23 eV against 1.12 eV for silicon. This means that the SiC is less likely to suffer from current leakage thus making it ideal to work at high temperatures.
    All of this translates into better electronics with a dramatic size and weight reduction along with smaller cooling systems, since SiC can operate at higher temperatures, the energy needed to maintain cooling can be reduced by up to 30% if not more.
    Sources
    www.ev-volumes.com/country/tot...
    www.pntpower.com/is-teslas-pr...
    www.transportenvironment.org/...
    www.shindengen.com/products/s...
    info.ornl.gov/sites/publicati...
    www.arrow.com/en/research-and...
    insideevs.com/news/343256/tes...
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moissanite
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_...
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canyon_...)
    • Toyota's New Silicon C...
    • "Emerging Trends in Si...
    • SiC Power Devices
    Image Attribution
    Musée d'Histoire Naturelle de Lille / CC BY-SA (creativecommons.org/licenses/...)
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 242

  • @Sekir80
    @Sekir80 3 роки тому +264

    Okay, this was interesting! Now, we need a comparison of SiC with GaN, another game changer in the field. Will you do it, dear Subject Zero?

    • @MrMuki61
      @MrMuki61 3 роки тому +5

      Awesome question. Did some research thanks to the wizardry of Google. Found a paper and an article:
      www.richardsonrfpd.com/docs/rfpd/Microsemi-A-Comparison-of-Gallium-Nitride-Versus-Silicon-Carbide.pdf
      www.arrow.com/en/research-and-events/articles/silicon-carbide-and-gallium-nitride-compared
      GaN has a higher electron mobility, but SiC has better thermal conductivity. Factoring the fact that GaN is not as mature (production wise) as SiC and that SiC surpasses it in terms of up-front costs (while doing better when it comes to high powered electrical systems thanks to it's better thermal conductivity), it is a more effective solution - that being said, GaN can still find a niche in small, high-frequency products (like CPUs). So SiC will be more widely used in the battery charging and power transfer systems, while GaN will be probably find better use in micro electronics.

    • @dekutree64
      @dekutree64 3 роки тому +7

      lol, you saw Engadget's video too, huh?

    • @combin8or
      @combin8or 3 роки тому +12

      A comparison between SiC and GaN would be entertaining- but then a dive into SiC GaN hybrid devices would be really interesting!
      I encountered some SiC GaN devices on Mouser the other day and haven’t had the time to do a deep dive. They seem to combine the advantages of both to create some really capable devices.

    • @Sekir80
      @Sekir80 3 роки тому +1

      @@dekutree64 Yes, sure I did! ;)

    • @gameresearch9535
      @gameresearch9535 3 роки тому +7

      There is a lot of bias and corruption between that other channel you mentioned with GaN and this channel that we are commenting under with the video. Notice Graphene isn't mentioned anywhere.
      Check this out.
      Go to my channel, find Technology Research, go there.
      You can also do a youtube search for Technology Research vid1, find my channel through that video.
      Go right away to the playlists area by clicking on the playlists button at the top of my other channel, and click "created playlists".
      If you can't find the playlists button at the top, click on the home page of my other channel, and then it should show the playlists button at the top.
      Once you find all the playlists, go to a playlist called "Graphene playlist".
      And then another playlist called "Videos with important info to get around my channel".
      Be sure to check out all the other playlists on Graphene and Quantum Technologies.
      After you watch all the videos from top to bottom in that order in each playlist, check each playlist description for articles, info and links to official websites.
      Don't forget to check back manually in the playlist area for updates, being a subscriber won't always show a new video added to those playlists.
      My other channel is for showing people the big picture, for awareness and learning.
      I'm a visionary and optimistic, to a whole other level of good innovation, with Graphene and Quantum Technologies.
      It's all facts from proof, no conspiracy theory.
      I feel the these channels that we're commenting under are very biased and corrupt, they even keep me from giving links because my comments become hidden if I do, and sometimes even without links my comments are hidden, there is a lot of bias and corruption going on.

  • @SubjectZeroScience
    @SubjectZeroScience  3 роки тому +39

    Guys, some of your are wondering where the 20% comes from.
    Apologies for not being clear in the video, but the 20% refers to the TOTAL power loss of the SYSTEM, not just inverter, at temperatures above 100˚C.
    The efficiency you see in most inverters are tied to "working temperature", and as it increases, efficiency decreases.
    Silicon carbide offers better efficiency at higher temperatures.
    Its from Mitsubishi and some other companies.

  • @tehPete
    @tehPete 3 роки тому +44

    Always happy to see SZS in my feed :)

  • @WestpalmFreerunner
    @WestpalmFreerunner 3 роки тому +5

    This is so helpful for my Chemistry class. Thanks!!!

  • @daverei1211
    @daverei1211 3 роки тому +2

    Thank you, I love your videos. Perfect.

  • @lior1222
    @lior1222 3 роки тому +1

    Another high quality video! Thank you!

  • @estebanguerrero682
    @estebanguerrero682 3 роки тому +1

    Always waiting for your awesome videos and excellent as always, thanks so much for the good content

  • @MrRickyw01
    @MrRickyw01 3 роки тому +2

    I have never considered efficiencies during the conversion of DC to AC until now. Thank you for this video.

  • @zirokl
    @zirokl 3 роки тому

    Another amazing video. Love your work.

  • @literallybiras
    @literallybiras 3 роки тому +7

    Hello everyone, subject zero here, always brings me joy to hear

  • @BerlinettaFerrari
    @BerlinettaFerrari 3 роки тому

    WOW....who knew an old tech was about to change so much! Thank you!

  • @duckguy1386
    @duckguy1386 3 роки тому +1

    Always love to see your and realengineering's videos in my feed, science and especially informative random science is my favorite

  • @JS-pl6zw
    @JS-pl6zw 3 роки тому +2

    as a materials science student, I appreciate your channel

  • @Kevin_Street
    @Kevin_Street 3 роки тому

    That's fascinating! Thanks for another great video.

  • @dramaqueen4640
    @dramaqueen4640 3 роки тому

    Very exciting future material and easy to chew, fun video, thx

  • @ghostindamachine
    @ghostindamachine 3 роки тому

    Super interesting! And really, those 3D animations are top notch!

  • @ei-x
    @ei-x 3 роки тому

    Thanks again for this wonderful video

  • @zlatko2709
    @zlatko2709 3 роки тому +1

    Amazing video! Keep up the great work.

  • @SuMiTKuMaR4113
    @SuMiTKuMaR4113 3 роки тому +1

    Great explanation.. loved it .

  • @BanterRanterr
    @BanterRanterr 2 роки тому

    Amazing video as usual

  • @PPYTAO
    @PPYTAO 3 роки тому

    Excellent production 👌

  • @kingarthurthe5th
    @kingarthurthe5th 3 роки тому

    Always love your videos dude, thanks for the info :)

  • @michaelcanary7814
    @michaelcanary7814 3 роки тому +4

    Great video, can't wait to see more EVs on the road

  • @eriktempelman2097
    @eriktempelman2097 3 роки тому

    Very informative, thanks!

  • @theonewind
    @theonewind 3 роки тому +1

    Top tier channel, for sure

  • @GauravGupta-pb8mk
    @GauravGupta-pb8mk 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you sir for information

  • @Erik-rp1hi
    @Erik-rp1hi 3 роки тому +1

    I've been using Silicon Carbide cutting tools since the 80's. They can use different coatings to get even greater wear properties. It has been the go to material for a long time.

  • @topicalcuck8485
    @topicalcuck8485 3 роки тому

    Awesome video!

  • @mihailazar2487
    @mihailazar2487 3 роки тому +5

    06:41
    That's it, we're done here
    reminds me of the Portal2 investment oportunity videos with Cave Johnson

  • @blitz8229
    @blitz8229 3 роки тому

    Nice Graphics! Keep on!

  • @pebdesign
    @pebdesign 3 роки тому +15

    Such a good quality and such a nice and interesting topic. Really appreciate the video!
    At 3:44 you misspelled first :D

    • @MrV1T
      @MrV1T 3 роки тому +5

      And on 5:33 misspelled "MARKET". Yes, we actually read these texts :)

  • @centar1595
    @centar1595 3 роки тому +11

    Awesome video:) i think that 20% losses could be a little bit of an overstatement, these systems are quite a bit more efficient, but if so much mass/price could be reduced-that'd be awesome.

    • @chrisminnoy3637
      @chrisminnoy3637 3 роки тому

      A charge/discharge loss of 30% is normal...the best systems on the planet can reduce this to 20%, so it is correct. That's why it is always beter to let your EV just come to a halt by itself instead of regenerative breaking....if traffic allows ofcourse.

    • @centar1595
      @centar1595 3 роки тому

      @@chrisminnoy3637 the sentence was about inverters in general if I understood it correctly. They themselves are more efficient, up to 95+%. www.e-education.psu.edu/eme812/node/738

    • @kensmith5694
      @kensmith5694 3 роки тому

      @@chrisminnoy3637
      30% total losses means one direction had about 16% loss. There were 2 converters involved in that round trip.

    • @chrisminnoy3637
      @chrisminnoy3637 3 роки тому

      @@kensmith5694 that's correct. We used batteries for wind balancing in the past...30% loss roundtrip, there is a more loss from dc to ac than reverse. From ac to dc you can reduce the loss to 8 or 9 % in the best case.

  • @koningsbruggen
    @koningsbruggen 3 роки тому

    These video's are gorgeous.

  • @Sekir80
    @Sekir80 3 роки тому

    Yay! Subject Zero!

  • @morkovija
    @morkovija 3 роки тому +1

    quality content stamp

  • @markusofficial9016
    @markusofficial9016 3 роки тому +45

    I wouldn't say SiC is the key to even better charging rates. We currently have 350kW chargers everywhere, but afaik there is no car battery that allows that charging rate.

    • @JanneWolterbeek
      @JanneWolterbeek 3 роки тому

      Seems new Tesla Model S & X will get close I read recently, needed better cables for cooling as a last step.

    • @apollo3679
      @apollo3679 3 роки тому

      In 10 years we will have figured out how to deliver insane charge rates that don’t damage the batteries.

    • @flowerofash4439
      @flowerofash4439 2 роки тому

      @@apollo3679 one day we can harvest lightning lol

  • @jellymop
    @jellymop 3 роки тому

    I used to work for a company called AGC Electronics America. Japanese company that manufactured SiC ceramics mainly for use in the high temp FAB ovens you see at places like Intel. SiC can withstand some seriously high temperature with relatively low thermal expansion compared to other materials. It’s idea for ovens as well. But it’s extremely brittle and one can easily break a $50,000 SiC wafer boat with hardly any trauma. It’s hard as hell but because it’s so brittle if a finish piece I’m gets hit and it vibrates at resonance it’s can shatter in weak spots. I’ve broken things before that are worth more than my car. It happens to the best of us. Your heart sinks every time. It’s traumatizing haha.

  • @investwithstuph5887
    @investwithstuph5887 2 роки тому

    superb!

  • @jdrissel
    @jdrissel 3 роки тому +1

    Silicon carbide is made on the wafer by masking off where you don't want it, evacuate the chamber and discharge a tiny bit of carbon monoxide right next to the wafer and evacuate again. Some of the CO will be stuck to the Si. Then discharge a tiny bit of silane gas. This will react to form a single molecule thick SiC film. Repeat for thicker films. When the mask is removed the excess SiC will be removed. That is a cool use of two very dangerous materials. CO is the most common cause of lethal poisoning and silane explodes on contact with air. There are some seriously dangerous materials used to make the chips we use every day.

    • @Basement-Science
      @Basement-Science 3 роки тому

      True. Dont forget about Hydrofluoric acid used to etch stuff which will also usually kill you if it gets on your skin.
      It all just requires the correct procedures to make it safe to use.

  • @Unmannedair
    @Unmannedair 3 роки тому

    Excellent job as usual. It strikes me at some of the properties of silicon carbide a remarkably similar to that of graphite. There's a technical name for this sort of iso trophy.

    • @kensmith5694
      @kensmith5694 3 роки тому

      In general, unless it is a metal, the harder a material is the more conductive to heat. Both are extremely hard at least in 2 dimensions.

  • @burbage54
    @burbage54 3 роки тому +1

    How would cubic boron nitride compare? Interested as I am familiar with both from my experience with both as abrasive materials.

  • @r3forge
    @r3forge 3 роки тому +6

    I very appreciate your effort in picking interesting topics and explaining them in a comprehensive way. Great Job! May I ask what software tools you use for the animations and video editing?

    • @adarshsrivastav2925
      @adarshsrivastav2925 3 роки тому +3

      Well, he just mentioned in the end including blender

    • @DanteKG.
      @DanteKG. 3 роки тому +1

      Blender, Apple Motion and mObject

  • @Elesario
    @Elesario 3 роки тому +13

    Thanks for the great video. FYI, minor error on the info-graphic text for the "First" LED, where it say's "Fist" instead.

    • @bobrikerik
      @bobrikerik 3 роки тому +1

      Also at 5:42 it says "MARKTE" instead of market

    • @SilverRose45
      @SilverRose45 3 роки тому

      sometimes you dont notice them or you do but its too late as re rendering the video might put you over the release deadline

  • @JoshMr07
    @JoshMr07 3 роки тому +3

    SiC substrates vs Si substrates based thyristors in the inverters? if this is the case how easy it is to do photolithography on SiC and what about epitaxy on SiC?
    Does the wafer formed at the very bottom of the Silicon crystal during CZ process considered SiC? when carbon concentration is the highest from the impurities of the crucible?
    I really need to start reading latest research on semiconductor device again. my book "physics of semiconductor device" at my bookself staring at me right now.

  • @davidvavra9113
    @davidvavra9113 11 місяців тому

    Thanks

  • @_ernst
    @_ernst 3 роки тому +12

    Cave Johnson. We're done here!

    • @NuclearTopSpot
      @NuclearTopSpot 3 роки тому +4

      1. Do it from scratch
      2. Spare no expense
      3. Never cut corners (except at the corner cutting machine)
      I see Subject Zero successfully implemented Mr. Johnson's father's theories on farming.

    • @realdragon
      @realdragon 3 роки тому

      @@NuclearTopSpot Aaaand we're broke

    • @iwiffitthitotonacc4673
      @iwiffitthitotonacc4673 3 роки тому

      I always have to skip that part. Always makes me involuntarily cringe.

    • @unrulybot1352
      @unrulybot1352 3 роки тому

      I knew cave johnson,
      He's my father...
      Dad are you space, 'Yes son, now we are a family's
      SPACE

  • @Mdvr85
    @Mdvr85 3 роки тому +8

    “The bandgap - not N’SYNC” 😂

  • @schautamatic
    @schautamatic 3 роки тому +25

    And to think that I threw out my bag of SiC grit during a move some years back. 😫🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @r.awilliams9815
      @r.awilliams9815 3 роки тому

      Huh, I just bought 45 pounds of it, 46/70 grit.

  • @sdlion7287
    @sdlion7287 3 роки тому +1

    Nice and informative video, I would have liked to know why it hasn't been welcomed before into electronics and what has been the breakthrough these years

  • @Infamous41
    @Infamous41 3 місяці тому

    This is what my gems are made from

  • @NomenNescio99
    @NomenNescio99 3 роки тому

    And I started to watch this video expecting a discussion on abrasives.
    But I wasn't disappointed in any way, perhaps a little surprised but I really enjoyed the video!

  • @BrentLeVasseur
    @BrentLeVasseur 7 місяців тому

    How did you make this video? The motion graphics are impressive and very professional! Nice job!

  • @sqdtnz
    @sqdtnz 3 роки тому +3

    I like your channel. It is informative and has very high quality production value, with animations and 3d models.
    One of the things it lacks to 'similar' channels (Joe Scott, Veritasium, Vsauce) is the lack of a host. There is no person on screen, just a voice-over basically. I think UA-cam channels' popularity is increased if there is a person attached to it, it just adds that little extra. As a viewer you develop a connection to the host, even though it is completely one-sided of course.

  • @kapilesh14
    @kapilesh14 3 роки тому +2

    The most hard working, the most original, the most creative science youtuber.

  • @flynifty3951
    @flynifty3951 3 роки тому +1

    What stock do i have to buy? Thanks!

  • @Lukegear
    @Lukegear 3 роки тому +2

    HELL YEAH!

  • @donnievick6967
    @donnievick6967 3 роки тому +1

    Love the 3d animations and style. What programs do you use ?

  • @gig2734
    @gig2734 3 роки тому

    Two months ago you had a short film about how graphene could increase the storage capacity of batteries. Can graphene technology be combined with Silcon Carbide?

  • @samuelmason8370
    @samuelmason8370 3 роки тому

    I used to work manufacturing this stuff with a CVD process. was super cool; lot of electricity; lot of money lol

  • @mikeloftin1291
    @mikeloftin1291 3 роки тому

    Would these same properties of silicon carbide produce a more efficient solar pvc cell?

  • @overlyfatman9722
    @overlyfatman9722 3 роки тому

    Better cooling I like the sound of that

  • @niko4u142
    @niko4u142 3 роки тому

    did you consider syncing your content to lbry? that would be very nice.

  • @attitudeadjuster793
    @attitudeadjuster793 3 роки тому +2

    Intersting stuff. One thing I was missing though - what's the current status of this tech? Is there anything holding back mass adoption? Any yet unsolved technical hurdles? Or just mass production and integration into the existing ecosystem taking its time?
    For example we get promised some revolutionary new battery tech every other week but then you hear nothing about it ever again because those are lab results and it doesn't work when you try to build a billion of them.

  • @saalkz.a.9715
    @saalkz.a.9715 2 роки тому

    That's quite SiCk!

  • @fromthefuture7172
    @fromthefuture7172 3 роки тому

    Which companies or research teams are involved?

  • @infinidoge
    @infinidoge 3 роки тому +2

    I'm interested and I havent even watched the video yet

  • @Mikkel111
    @Mikkel111 3 роки тому

    Just purchased a Baseus charger using GaN and SiC components.

  • @OldGamerNoob
    @OldGamerNoob 3 роки тому +1

    if silicon is similar to corbon, are there any benefits to a graphene molecule with silicon atoms replacing some of the carbon?

    • @reddragon9918
      @reddragon9918 3 роки тому

      Or silicone with graphene, I believe Seeker recently did a video on this. Apparently it depends on the angle of the graphene molecule

  • @marceldiehl8841
    @marceldiehl8841 2 роки тому

    Great video about SiC. However, a blend of elemental carbon and elemental silicon (or sometimes SiOx) can be used as anode material for LIBs. Both elemets store lithium through two different processes. Carbon is a intercalation material and silicon is a conversion material. The benefit of silicon is the theoretical capacity of around 3500 mAh/g which is ten times higher than carbon (or graphite to be more precise). Unfortunately, silicon suffers from a vast volume expansion of 300 % during the charging process which massively damages the anode during operation. Therefore, a blend of carbon and silicon (with an increasing amount of silicon in the future) is used to accomodate the volume expansion while benefiting from an increased practical capacity compared to carbon-only anodes.

  • @colanuss4985
    @colanuss4985 3 роки тому

    Can you please do a making of or provide resources for this excellent presentation style of technical topics? I think many presentations would benefit, but of course, only if the presenter is capable enough to invest hours in Blender.

  • @Vivaswaan.
    @Vivaswaan. 3 роки тому +2

    A very promising technology indeed. Would be great to see it being used more in the future.

    • @kensmith5694
      @kensmith5694 3 роки тому

      Silicon still has some fight left in it. The "super junction MOSFET" gives the SiC part a good run for its money in current designs. "super junction" designs makes MOSFETs that have many of the good properties that 100V MOSFETs have with a breakdown voltage as high as 2000V. The high voltage area is where the SiC parts have the most advantage normally.

  • @merseyless
    @merseyless 3 роки тому

    Higher voltage, lower resistance, faster switching times and lower gate capacitance making them easier to drive. We're already using them and seeing efficiency gains.

    • @kensmith5694
      @kensmith5694 3 роки тому

      Also worth mentioning is the "power JFET" or "static induction transistor". Those parts allow for a lot of simplifications of topologies where cascodes are used to make a high voltage switch.

  • @OlivierSuire
    @OlivierSuire 3 роки тому +1

    This begs for answering the question : why isn't it there already ?
    What technical challenges still need to be overcome, etc...

  • @yahyaalzahrani1481
    @yahyaalzahrani1481 3 роки тому

    Go go go go

  • @FrancescoDiMauro
    @FrancescoDiMauro 3 роки тому +2

    nice! how far in the future are we talking?

    • @kensmith5694
      @kensmith5694 3 роки тому +1

      Basically "tomorrow". SiC parts will be in next years electric car.

  • @phillipsusi1791
    @phillipsusi1791 3 роки тому

    Where did you get this figure of 20% loss in inverters? The specifications on all inverters that I have read quote an efficiency of 95% to 97.5%.

    • @SubjectZeroScience
      @SubjectZeroScience  3 роки тому

      this figure comes from Mitsubishi. Its 20% of total power loss of the system, not just the inverter. so it is 20% of that 5% to 2.5% at temperatures above 150˚C.

  • @vdmur7952
    @vdmur7952 3 роки тому

    Interesting.

  • @shauljonah6955
    @shauljonah6955 3 роки тому

    Very cool when its 15 minutes to 80% that will give you time for a pit stop and get food then eat and go back to the car. Or fully charged if you don't take your food to go after walking in to restaurants. Just a thought.

  • @manavkukreja5023
    @manavkukreja5023 3 роки тому

    Can you also please make a video on PHA from food waste, industrial technology

  • @Mikehoran45
    @Mikehoran45 Місяць тому

    whats the stock symbol??

  • @SeaMushroom98
    @SeaMushroom98 3 роки тому

    At Marquette a team is working on a 1MW AC-DC converter

  • @warrickterry4742
    @warrickterry4742 3 роки тому

    Dumb question, so what about solid state batteries (ref Toyota) and graphene batteries ( not the coated but the full version.) Are they for different purpose, competition, or is this a dumb question and I do not understand the uses of these three products?

  • @telljuliet1
    @telljuliet1 3 роки тому +1

    Jeremy Clarkson called this way before : silicon carbideeee

  • @knight2255
    @knight2255 3 роки тому +2

    What companies/stocks make ev grade SiC? Is there a green ETF?

    • @kensmith5694
      @kensmith5694 3 роки тому

      There really is no EV grade. Just look up SiC transistors. Anyone making them is a candidate for who the big supplier may be.

    • @jonastornqvist8698
      @jonastornqvist8698 3 роки тому

      Cree and STMicroelectronics. Cree are the leading substrate wafer manufacturer and ST are more of packning + selling.

  • @maozedong549
    @maozedong549 3 роки тому +1

    Can you talk about renuable energy

  • @albertocity1
    @albertocity1 3 роки тому

    Nice! GaN comparison is mandaroty now

  • @thomasbrown1026
    @thomasbrown1026 3 роки тому +2

    Great video. Is there a source for the bill of materials reduction claim?

    • @Basement-Science
      @Basement-Science 3 роки тому

      The cost savings would come mainly from reduced _Size_ of components, especially those necessary for cooling since with higher efficiency there is less need for cooling.

  • @justingt3rs
    @justingt3rs 3 роки тому

    best stocks for this are ?

  • @TheSilviu8x
    @TheSilviu8x 3 роки тому +1

    That's awfully similar to what semiconductors need to breach the wall!

  • @RCP-1136
    @RCP-1136 3 роки тому

    How does it affect charging time? I would have guessed this depends more on battery technology than charger circuitry.

    • @remigaillard4802
      @remigaillard4802 3 роки тому

      It's explained at the end of the video, could divide by 2 the charging time (if batteries allows it)

    • @zamundaaa776
      @zamundaaa776 3 роки тому

      It allows for a more efficient, compact and cheaper charger.

    • @Basement-Science
      @Basement-Science 3 роки тому

      It doesnt affect the charging time. It changes how cheap, compact and light a charger will be, wheather it is faster or not. You *_could_* build a faster charger with 19th century technology if you really wanted to.
      And yes, the batteries are the limiting factor these days in most cases.

  • @chulhogan1445
    @chulhogan1445 3 роки тому +1

    Could you add subtitles (at least english) please ?

  • @BeLikeWaterMMA
    @BeLikeWaterMMA 3 роки тому +1

    What if you could use magnets faced+\-this wil allow if strong enough a way to create an infinite energy source witch could be harnessed to create some kin of electric engine and if again strong enough could be used to create a hyperdrive that never depletes or create a car that you never have to refuel . Hens whe could make magnetic fusion energy only problem is where do you store it? Well for somethings small like a car you could use a normal battery what whe use in our electric cars but with some thing like a spacecraft it must be a much different way I can’t quite figure out that but for cars it could be a massive improvement because the car would charge wile driving and also be able to charge while not driving theoretically .Greetings from South Africa 🇿🇦.

  • @kerbodynamicx472
    @kerbodynamicx472 3 роки тому

    Mass production before discovery... this is some serious science to think about

  • @prashant3118
    @prashant3118 3 роки тому

    Source of band gap please.

  • @grantsuckow1145
    @grantsuckow1145 3 роки тому

    how did i miss this video ?

  • @aniksamiurrahman6365
    @aniksamiurrahman6365 3 роки тому

    With GaN the main problem is, the purest GaN crystals usually have >1000 times crystal defects than Si crystals. Now, what is the situation on SiC?

  • @TikboyTM
    @TikboyTM 3 роки тому +1

    Embarrassed to say this, but I think I'm the only one who came here to know about Silicon Carbide...and how it "bullet-proofs" John Wick's suit. :-P (P.S. Great presentation by the way.)

    • @cumguzzler8537
      @cumguzzler8537 3 роки тому

      It may make it "Bullet Proof", but also makes his ribs "Broken"

  • @donaldboughton8686
    @donaldboughton8686 3 роки тому +1

    I have a problem with the utility of electric cars. Consider the energy transfer rate when fuelling a diesel car. Diesel oil contains 36 MJ per litre and it takes about 2 minutes to put 50 litres in the tank That's a transfer rate of 15,000,000 Joules per second or 15,000,000 Volt Amperes or being very loose with units 15 MW. How is one going to get this sort of power out of a charger? I will be sticking with Diesel cars for the foreseeable future. Example I was in Edinburgh at 14:00 by 21:45 I was in London Earls Court. When I can get an electric car with comparable performance at the same price as Diesel car with the same interior build I will buy one assuming I am still allowed to drive.

    • @Basement-Science
      @Basement-Science 3 роки тому

      Your problem is that you think people "fuel" their electric cars at a gas station. They dont, except in very special circumstances.

  • @Venerable_Banana
    @Venerable_Banana 3 роки тому +2

    👊🏻 LED

  • @ameliabuns4058
    @ameliabuns4058 3 роки тому

    Can't wait till they add this to astroneer