County Quits after Hitchcock Cross of one witness
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 вер 2024
- Milwaukee County Sheriff’s Office managed to muster enough energy to cross examine one witness. When that didn’t go so well, they threw in the towel and called it a day. They did spend more taxpayer money along the way.
Keep exposing these scumbags bro. Stay the course, you have my full support from out here in Colorado.
... Do you know that 'Boebutt' Idiot on Two 'Feet'🤔🏴📃
You fully support him all they way from Colorado what does that look like? (Your support)?
My heart breaks to hear what Mr Lucky went through.
It seems like the county’s behavior is designed specifically to bleed him dry of funds in hopes he’ll give up. Shameful.
Thank you for sharing this and hopeful for a swift decision, in spite of the county’s tactics.
Well to be blunt that's exactly what every court case is. Almost always one of the individuals or groups in litigation has more money than the other. There's a reason they say you can't fight city hall or the government. You can also add the police, or municipal services, your employer, big business of any kind, or a rich individual. As it is any court case is expensive and extremely time consuming. In any given year, 98% of criminal cases in the federal courts end with a plea bargain - a practice that prizes efficiency over fairness and innocence, according to a new report from the American Bar Association.Feb 22, 2023. You better never get hurt at work because that can literally take 3 to 5 years to litigate, and will either cost you a percentage of any settlement or tens of thousands in cash payed hourly.
Well to be blunt that's exactly what every court case is. Almost always one of the individuals or groups in litigation has more money than the other. There's a reason they say you can't fight city hall or the government. You can also add the police, or municipal services, your employer, big business of any kind, or a rich individual. As it is any court case is expensive and extremely time consuming. In any given year, 98% of criminal cases in the federal courts end with a plea bargain - a practice that prizes efficiency over fairness and innocence, according to a new report from the American Bar Association.Feb 22, 2023. You better never get hurt at work because that can literally take 3 to 5 years to litigate, and will either cost you a percentage of any settlement or tens of thousands in cash payed hourly.
💯
@@girlinvtalthough in criminal cases the public defender is provided by the public....as are the prosecuters. True, they are limited in the cost and expense that can be provided at a client's whim...especially if it is a clear cut situation. Prosecuters also are limited in how much can be spent in certain situations. A small town prosecution can be told to settle if the private citizen has deeper pockets.
I agree with the underlying point I think that you age trying to make, but wanted to just say that. Now when it comes to state and Federal, yeah...those budgets are waaaaaaay more suited to prosecute to prove a point. That is especially true when it comes to agencies with abbreviations (EPA, DOE, DOJ, IRS, etc etc etc). So I DO agree, but criminal is SLIGHTLY different...at least at the beginning or on 90% (a random number I decided to arbitrarily assign) of such criminal cases.
That's pretty much what all court hearings are. The more powerful entity will drag the poorer entity through every court hearing possible.
"Objection: Foundation."
"Sustained"
Watch the lawyer proceed to build the foundation. NICE!
I know
So annoying how people in power when they are being asked why something is happening or has happened that shows they acted wrongly they always say "we'll have to look into it" then absolutely NOTHING happens. Is that response a free pass to do whatever you want without any repercussions.
Very typical. The people in power like the power but not the responsibility or accountability that comes with it.
My new favorite channel. From now on, when I ask someone a question. You better believe I'm putting " or something else" at the end of it from now on! The way you say it sounds like a catchphrase! I love it!
We are glad you’re here! Thanks for watching or something else… 😂
Ben Hutchinson Cross, is the BOSS! ❤😂
Subbed, liked and subbed again. Thank you for your work on Miss Eskros case. Sharing with friends.
Awesome, thank you!
They bank on the plaintiff running out of money. 4 weeks for transcripts absurd.
Classic tactics of delay and exhaust.
@tc4660
In one of the earlier videos of this Bethany Eskro series, there is a link to a GFM in the description section of the video. If we all who are outraged at what she went through gave even a dollar, Ben's bill would be paid, and then some.
@@lisahinton9682 this tactic or strategy needs to be litigated so as to bring penalties if employed, it clearly violates speedy trial legal requirements. It’s repeatedly used(abused) to make issues go away and applies undue psychological stress on the accused which is just as bad as physical damage.
What Bull
@@deliberateindifferencewi The process is the punishment.
The phrase “totality of the circumstances” needs to be eliminated from the vernacular of the public sector and from the courts. Procedurally in LEO policy and in court procedure elements are identified step by step and each of those elements have merit rendering them unique to totality.
yeah it's very often abused to arrest someone or abuse someone on essentially RAS or even less. Essentially, many times it does not amount to probable cause.
@@Xenotypic what kills me is that these people think arresting someone is procedural. When, in fact, it’s one of the most traumatic incidents a person can go through in their lives. Arresting one innocent person should be equivalent to one police officer being hurt or losing their life maliciously. And treated as such with a parade and flowers letting the community know a huge mistake was made.
Totality of circumstance can be the enemy of due process or a way for a judge to say something doesn’t smell right. Either way its not definite.
Employment law also requires employees to vindicate themselves in retaliatory investigations. Maybe it would be ok if there were unlimited damages for putting them through it but employees lose out either way.
This case is at the intersection of criminal and employment law.
Wow . Intelligent, thoughtful, dignified people. That was beautiful.
The MCSO should not have even wasted the taxpayer money up to this point. One witness was one too many.
Ben throwing that pirate joke in, though! LMAO! The guy cracks me up with his quick wit at every turn! Slammin' Chief Buffoon, slammin' the buffoon's attorney, and throwin' in a pirate joke to boot! Love this guy!
😂 thanks for watching and following along with Ben’s humor. You never know what zinger is about to be served.
Ben , you are very interesting to watch and listen to!
Thanks for watching and commenting!
I agree! This is what fighting for justice looks like.
He is entertaining while doing the just thing. How refreshing!
How the hell can Douglas Holton, Jr
testify with a sexual abuse in his record?
DISGUSTING!!!
He's multi racial!
I know u lying!! Omg
35:25 👏👏👏👏 imagine if more of us had that phrase so readily available to us!
We all have a lot to learn.
You can also see Ben struggling not to make a pirate joke.
The wheels of justice seem to move exceedingly snail like. I do understand this is a civil matter. Stay thecourse. 53:35
It’s unbelievable. Thanks for watching. We know lucky worked hard for his day in court.
God I hope Mr. Lucku wins. It's so easy for governmental employers to railroad employees. Maybe justice will prevail. Counsel certainly gave it all he had.
The totality of circumstances may be that a subordinate should be called N.
He thinks someone will believe that.
For better or worse, the judge reminds me of a character on The Office.
😂 now that’s something to think about.
The uk one or the American one
.she reminds me of a certain hair teacher in a movie.where she lived in her nieces house,also a teacher. Made a boy eat a huge chocolate cake..Didn't like children.
With your help sir we're gonna fix these scumbags one by one...
... They're Like "La Cucaracha" Amigo... Auditor's Will Always Be In Need... Indeed 🏴🥂 🥸
27:25 He looks like he was just about to THROW UP a little.
Nervous Much, Mister Holton?
❤️🇺🇲❤️
😂🤣😂🤣😂
“Mrs. Lawrence, that might work on the PRB, but not in Wisconsin!”
I almost choked on my cold drink😂🤣
Did you order the code red!!???
YOU CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!!
This guy must be an albino multi racial witness. I'm white and Holton is way whiter than I am. Weird🤔
your opinion in his genetics changes nothing. Have you never seen how siblings can vary?
I would like to know what are the multi races.
@@lindag4029 in USA 'just one drop of colored blood' is the rule.
😂😂😂
Me too @lindag4029 😂😂😂😂
Why did the first female asking about walking someone out of the building ask what race is the male in her interrogation? She asked for the man’s DOB and his nationality or race? That question seemed very intrusive and seemed to have no relation to the interrogation. Why did she ask about the man’s race?
They are attempting to show that race and gender don’t matter in the real world.
Attorneys seem confused with each response.
Ok.
Ok.
Have your Bingo evidence card ready for the end ❤️ !
BINGO! 🔥
They love to say this: “The Totality of the situation”. These words are a cop-out in 99.9% of cases. Shouldn’t be allowed!
We could not agree with this more.
Thanks for the share.
Our pleasure!
More than 100 million cases are filed each year in state trial courts, while roughly 400,000 cases are filed in federal trial courts. So if you think any case you maybe involved in is ever going to be guick in any way your going to be in for a surprise. While many cases settle within a few months to a year, cases that must go all the way to trial for resolution can take a good deal longer. If your in federal court it can take 12 to 18 months on average. So if your out of work, in jail, or suddenly handicapped from an injury at work your going to be bringing in zero money, and will have to maintain yourself and home with zero income coming in, plus payment by the hour for a competent lawyer. A civil case is even more time. Although most cases will go to trial within 2 years from the date of filing, some will take longer because they involve complex issues of liability, insurance coverage disputes or high dollar damages that require expert testimony to prove up. There isn't anyone involved in the court industry that isn't aware of the time it takes without staling tactics to get into a US court. They also are very aware that the individual is either in jail, out of work, or in some workers comp cases unable to physically do the job they used to before an injury and they will use that against you. Which means they are vulnerable either financial or physically or both, and the lawyers are well aware that you can't take an extended time case that can drag on for a year to upto 5 without going bankrupt.
@girlinvt
You know a lot, but ya can't spell _you're!_ Why not?
Watch you “ours” they like “R’s.” 😂
😂 ✅ 😂
Suspend for retaliation threats? Every joe private citizen would be jailed, charged and be susceptible to a protection order from the courts in addition to possible conviction for those threats.
Well you weren’t on SWAT with the investigators.
Why would his race matter to her? He was a witness.
Does anybody know of one person in the sheriff’s department that didn’t lie at some point or another and that also goes for M.Lawrence????
lol I don’t remember I don’t recall
Interesting how Doug says he mixed race and wierd they even asked that question in the begining.
Additionally, he doesn't looked mixed race so I highly doubt he has experienced racism at work.
I'm not saying someone who look more white can't experience it, so don't get me wrong.
I think it goes to his reaction to racial abuse, son.
I’ve never heard a cop refer to race as multiracial. Isn’t it referred to as black, white or Latino? Dispatchers would be scratching their heads
Well they used him for the one black friend argument.
GOOOOOOO LUCKY!!!!!
Service with racism, and an extreme lack of integrity.
Why is this not in a courtroom?
It’s an administrative hearing because it’s discrimination court. It’s by zoom because the administrative law judges have decided they can. On the other hand they are ways easier to post.
Why did he say usually, with the training question..why not say o learnt about .
...etc.By saying usually doesn't sound like he had done the training
Why ask his race?
Interesting 🧐
No but i dont recall 😂
Co`s piracy to lie.
Holton is multi-racial much like me - Irish & German!!
Lol...too bad irish and german are not races....they are white....their race is caucasian. Irish and German are nationalities
Training on diversity? It’s common sense in this day and age for anyone pursuing a career in the public sector. If you have a hint of bias work in the private sector. It easily identifiable by everyone around you. Give me a freaking break. That is as dumb as a jail sally port intake broadcasting every hour over the PA to remind employees not to sexual harass one another or the people coming in incarcerated.
So, she got Holton here as a quick witness huh? Over lunch break? Or I’m tripping? And why is she taking breaks like she has to go ask Ms. I don’t recall for the next step for her presentation!!
38:34 BINGO
Maybe i missed it. Is there more videos to explain to us to why this in front of a judge. Just looking for a little background on this case
There is a lucky intro video. We can try to out one out that recaps everything
@@deliberateindifferencewi please do... Love your work...
Why was he asked his race?
It’s a race discrimination suit
is there a verdict in this case?
Not yet.
Sounds like a discrimination troll.
2:11 Hey @deliberateindifferencewi why do they ask for race?
I’ve always been fascinated/perplexed by how in the US it’s completely acceptable to ask for someone’s race, whereas in most of the countries I’ve lived/live in -maybe a skewed sample - even the word “race” is at the very least seen as a bit… complicated if not outright offensive.
This is the only court where I've heard race requested from a witness along with DOB. This is highly unusual.
It is a variation of the black friend argument: Mr W is not racist because he has one black friend. Corporation is not racist because it has one black manager. We also understand Mr Hilton is the nephew of the former sheriff David Clarke.
@@sing2meMr Lucky filed a race discrimination suit so that’s why race is asked. It’s central to the entire proceeding 👍🏻
@@Bruce4lmighty so that applies to some witnesses and not others?
@@sing2me I can’t tell you what strategy for the line of questioning Ben used however, I can see the relevance if it proves the claims made in the suit. An Attorney can ask whatever they like during cross examination. Whether it “applies to some witnesses...” is invalid because there is no obligation to ask every witness the same questions…
I have no idea what is going on.
It’s the end of a five day hearing. We are gratified but mystified why this video gets so much attention.
are they not under oath during depositions.. its incredible how easily they lie using "i don't recall" about things they OBVIOUSLY do recall and its obvious to anyone watching and provable in so many ways that they are outright lying.. I'd be charged if i lied under oath but hey.. they are heros.. right?
A lie is an answer the same as the truth.
@@deliberateindifferencewi i'd lose my mind hearing some of these ppl.. respect for keeping your composure.. Have u ever lost it on a witness ? if so, which video is it LOL
Three things:
1. This is not a deposition.
2. Have you had any training of any time as part of your employment? When was that? How many hours exactly?
3. What were you wearing on your wedding day? What was the brand and color of socks? Did you wear an undershirt? How old was it?
?.@@deliberateindifferencewi
i finished it
Glad you made it through. Painful but important.
@@deliberateindifferencewi can you give me insight on what the goal of these proceedings are? I think I heard someone say it’s a probable cause hearing, and has a decision been handed down or your still waiting? Also, I assume if you appeal her decision it would be reviewed by someone not in Wisconsin?
Are we awaiting a decision?
Oh yeah. Awaiting and awaiting.
It's good to know this witness was multiracial. Because clearly that is something that is highly relevant.
😂
What exactly is “multi-racial”?
It seems like they think it’s a pass for them to discriminate.
What's this about?
This is a race discrimination complaint submitted by Deputy Lucky against the MKE Sheriff’s Office. If you go to the Lucky v MCSO playlist, you’ll be able for see the storyline from start to finish. Thanks for watching!
@@deliberateindifferencewi I appreciate the background on this video.
I love it! The pasty white, Irish looking guy isn't white, he is multiracial! This is a pitiful but does indicate someone who knows the game.
Those that know how to play take full advantage.
What did I miss? I neither saw nor heard anything to suggest that Anyone quit. You tube should ban anyone who uses click bait. Still, I can ask that the chanel not be recommended. So there's that
Well thanks for watching. We feel that resting 7 day hearing after one witness is quitting. Should there have been hands banging on tables?
Respectfully, the title of this video is 100% misleading. There was two days of testing hear not to mention multiple documents entered into evidence. We do not know who came before the witness on the video. To claim the opposing side “quit” is absolutely disingenuous. I am a criminal defense attorney and I have tried over 100 cases. In many of those I never called a witness. Why? Because I did not need to. That is not quitting, that is resting.
Moreover, I suspect this is a motion for summary judgement. That is not a trial and has different standards. And finally, if the county “quit,” and the attorney engaged in written arguments then there will be a written ruling by the court. Where is that ruling? If you had won you would have shown it.
We had at least one other comment like this who felt as strongly. Would you prefer rests over quits?
@@deliberateindifferencewi First off….my lord, am I unable to proof read? Apologies for the comment, it was borderline gibberish.
Next, “rests” has a different meaning than “quits.” You know that as well as I do. Don’t play dumb; you chose to title this video with with word “quit” not because it is accurate; but because you wanted viewers to click on the video. So yes, say “rests.” Be honest, and admit why you chose the label that you did (i.e. to get clicks).
Finally, I will restate my original argument (in better English). The title of this video is misleading. They other party did not quit after the first witness. This is proven by the various references to two days of previous testimony. I take exception to this video because the title is misleading.
@@johnweb7055 Overruled.
Why is this court hearing on zoom?
because it is an administrative workers hearing and not real court. O the other hand if this were in Federal court you would never see these witnesses.