Volume of a cone | Perimeter, area, and volume | Geometry | Khan Academy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 82

  • @footballworld3869
    @footballworld3869 7 років тому +57

    This man his drawing is awsome!

  • @variannevo642
    @variannevo642 8 років тому +50

    Thank you so much! This video actually helped me earn an A on my math quiz.

  • @MrMShake
    @MrMShake 7 років тому +17

    Please can you guys make a video to calculate the surface area using integration

  • @dorinemorris4667
    @dorinemorris4667 4 роки тому +7

    This man's drawing is spectacular! :)

  • @Paradox_Incognito
    @Paradox_Incognito 4 роки тому +5

    Thank you so much!!! I'm watching your videos over the summer to help remember what I learned this school year

  • @wilhufftarkin8543
    @wilhufftarkin8543 2 роки тому +4

    One thing that still baffles my mind is, WHY exactly is it 1/3?? If you take a 2D cross-section of a cone within a cylinder, it's basically a rectangle with a triangle within it. You can bisect the triangle into two equivalent mirrored triangles and you get two rectangles that are halved diagonally. If you add all the resulting triangles together, you should get 2/4 or 1/2, not 1/3. Yes, it's not 2D but 3D, which is a whole other story, but if you circle this whole thing around, I still don't understand how you get 1/3, even though it intuitively makes sense.

    • @lolthehihi929
      @lolthehihi929 Рік тому

      I am also wondering the same thing.

    • @irlallan
      @irlallan Рік тому

      I'm not sure but I'm pretty sure that we can test it, like try finding a funnel, and then a big cylinder like a water bottle, gallon jug of water etc. Put it inside, then figure out the volume of the cylinder, then the volume of the funnel. It won't be as accurate, but it will give you an idea of how it works. But still, like you said, it intuitively makes sense, though visually, it doesn't. Hope this helps!

    • @wilhufftarkin8543
      @wilhufftarkin8543 Рік тому

      @@irlallan That's probably how the ancient Greeks did it.

  • @irlallan
    @irlallan Рік тому +2

    Bro actually explained a 45 min geometry course in 5 mins - like that's insane!

    • @irlallan
      @irlallan Рік тому +1

      also who else is in 2023 rn?

  • @-MissSiri-
    @-MissSiri- 2 роки тому +2

    I WANNA SING YOU HAPPY BIRTHDAY YOUR DRAWINGS AND TEACHING STYLE ARE AMAZING!! ❤️

  • @marcarias5350
    @marcarias5350 6 років тому +7

    oh yes i learned so much!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @antonioquadrado734
    @antonioquadrado734 8 років тому +25

    but WHY is the volume of the cone 1/3 of the volume of cylinder?

    • @kat5607
      @kat5607 8 років тому +11

      if you take 3 cone of same volume melt it and then mold it into a cylinder it will be equal.

    • @anteconfig5391
      @anteconfig5391 7 років тому +4

      I know right. I need some mathematical proof.
      So I made some up.
      I presume that the VOLUME of a cone is the AREA of a triangle times the length of the circumference of the circle created by the cone. sooooo
      AREA of a triangle (I'll call the base "r") = rh/2
      circumference of circle = 2*pi*r
      when you multiple these together you get 2*pi*r*r*h/2
      or
      h*pi*r^2
      for some reason when I crunch the numbers I get TOO MUCH SPACE (???)
      hmm idk what to do..
      So I pretend that the reason I get to much space is because I accounted for "r" twice in the equation OR because the amount of space I have is the volume of a 4 dimensional cone (I'm not sure if that true but....... ...)
      so I divide by 3 (because Length * Width * Height = the volume of a 3 dimensional object) and get the proper answer.
      h*pi*r^2 / 3
      or
      1/3 * h*pi*r^2
      In other words... I'm in the same boat as you. I need mathematical proof.

    • @tamircohen1512
      @tamircohen1512 7 років тому +3

      I'm a year late but there are videos which explain this using calculus. If you're still interested and still don't know check them out.

    • @andresrebata1958
      @andresrebata1958 6 років тому +5

      its not a rigorous proof but u can think of how in 2d a triangle is half the area of a square with same height and width bc as the hypotenuse reaches the "peak" it loses half the area since its in 2 dimensions. Kind of the same happens with a cone but this time in 3d so as the side reaches the "peak" it loses 1/3 of the area. Hope this helps

    • @jasonvirasami1444
      @jasonvirasami1444 6 років тому +2

      Neko Master but it looks like 1/2 to me

  • @figueroabryan8656
    @figueroabryan8656 Рік тому

    tyvm bro!

  • @aishanasreen464
    @aishanasreen464 6 років тому +2

    Thank you sir.your teaching is very best

  • @itsbillie1968
    @itsbillie1968 3 роки тому +1

    Helped so much thanks

  • @sumaysethia7693
    @sumaysethia7693 5 років тому +2

    Nice vid pretty helpful

  • @TiberiusStorm
    @TiberiusStorm 8 років тому +12

    I have a Texas Instruments calculator but I had to input it differently than Sal to get that answer. r = √393/(5π)

  • @husseinsabrie3407
    @husseinsabrie3407 6 років тому +9

    the volume of the cone 1/3 of the volume of cylinder and did you get 5 pi

  • @Aadhyavyasasa
    @Aadhyavyasasa 8 років тому +4

    nice video

  • @thomasdeng7659
    @thomasdeng7659 9 років тому +9

    how did you get that cool calculator?

    • @chideranwosu211
      @chideranwosu211 8 років тому +1

      It is a Texas Instrumental. You can get it off Amazon

  • @gainknowledge2999
    @gainknowledge2999 3 роки тому

    How can you take capacity instead of volume?

  • @vidmaster011
    @vidmaster011 5 років тому +3

    Bro...if I didn’t come across this video in 10th grade I would have dropped out...the formula kept pissing me off.
    I ended up putting .3 and 1/3 in my calculator and kept giving me dumb answers. I finally put in a 3 and got it right. Phew...

  • @queeniefredabjumalon4615
    @queeniefredabjumalon4615 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much khan academy because I learn advance for your UA-cam and very understanding thanks for all 😊♥️

  • @kat5607
    @kat5607 8 років тому +2

    correct me if i am wrong.
    volume of cone could also be area of a cross section of the triangle i.e. !/2*base*height
    multiplied by 2 pi ?

    • @astrq1un3
      @astrq1un3 4 роки тому +1

      Cole Phillips honestly, your an idiotic nosy bully. go away. She/he just wants to actually succeed in life, unlike you.

  • @dhanvant.p.s6242
    @dhanvant.p.s6242 3 роки тому +2

    Why can't we calculate the volume by , circumference of the base × area of the right angle triangle = 2πr × rh/2

    • @galacticcuber2058
      @galacticcuber2058 3 роки тому +1

      becayse it doesnt staay constant throughout the calculation. In a cylinder, you can multiply the base times the height because the base stays the width throughout the whole shape. In this case, it gets smaller, so you cant have a constant multiplication through the triangle.

    • @mdzisantanvir9239
      @mdzisantanvir9239 2 роки тому

      @@galacticcuber2058 no he isn't talking about multiplying the circles area with the height, (we do understand that the circular area is decreasing)

    • @mdzisantanvir9239
      @mdzisantanvir9239 2 роки тому

      Exactly my question, the triangle is moving by the circumference therefore it's only logical that it's (triangle's area x circle's circumference) which would be piR^2h instead they just assume that it's 1/3 part of the cylinder 😬

  • @NoahGoldsmith
    @NoahGoldsmith 8 років тому +4

    The height and radius were the same??

    • @kat5607
      @kat5607 8 років тому +1

      nope its almost same

  • @bharatpatel6594
    @bharatpatel6594 4 роки тому

    Your welcome

  • @naveenrajg1002
    @naveenrajg1002 4 роки тому +1

    haven't told about that 1/3? generally people have doubt in this factor.

  • @m4x970
    @m4x970 4 роки тому +3

    His handwriting on a pc is better than mine irl

  • @friendsotsegolakeroute8032
    @friendsotsegolakeroute8032 7 років тому +5

    Another formula is: B x 1/3 x h.

    • @johnpark1520
      @johnpark1520 7 років тому +3

      friendsotsegolake/ route 80 It's the same formula. Base = pi × r squared.

  • @onlydreams4328
    @onlydreams4328 4 роки тому

    How did you get 131?

  • @redstallion415
    @redstallion415 2 роки тому

    How/why is dividing by 1/3 the same as multiplying by 3?

    • @biged680
      @biged680 Рік тому

      because dividing by a fraction does the opposite just like multiplying by a fraction would divide it

    • @sazidhasansafwan
      @sazidhasansafwan Рік тому

      reciprocal bro

  • @sangitathapa588
    @sangitathapa588 4 роки тому

    Yes

  • @SFK_CHEESE
    @SFK_CHEESE Рік тому

    Who is this man I goota know

  • @rikasoft
    @rikasoft 9 місяців тому

    Goat

  • @mohammedsalih6771
    @mohammedsalih6771 3 роки тому +1

    It's not clear that the cone is 1/3 of cylinder. No way to be sure. 🤔

  • @friendsotsegolakeroute8032
    @friendsotsegolakeroute8032 7 років тому +3

    Because 3 cones fit in one cylinder .

    • @stellar8689
      @stellar8689 7 років тому +2

      prove it.

    • @vol230
      @vol230 4 роки тому

      @Charlez Rosa mathematical proof?

  • @havehope646
    @havehope646 Рік тому +1

    Jesus loves you ❤️

  • @CrisisMonday
    @CrisisMonday 4 роки тому +1

    Whenever I try to write on the computer, I get chicken scratch.

    • @esmeliars
      @esmeliars 4 роки тому +1

      Hes using a drawing tablet

  • @neetu.mishra.
    @neetu.mishra. 3 роки тому

    Not visible

  • @Gnerf
    @Gnerf 3 роки тому +1

    A cone is half the volume of a cylinder

  • @hollymiller2557
    @hollymiller2557 6 років тому

    Heart this comment PLZZZ DUDE we use this at school all of the time

  • @heshamacademy7396
    @heshamacademy7396 6 років тому +2

    dear salman khan i have a FORMULA to FIND AREA of cone of 2d shape. i m hesham

  • @daniellarson9526
    @daniellarson9526 4 роки тому

    Guys

  • @kamilavazquez7772
    @kamilavazquez7772 9 років тому +2

    hi

  • @bread9418
    @bread9418 3 роки тому

    69 comments
    Nice

  • @soho1080
    @soho1080 2 дні тому

    You’re just reciting the formula.. not explaining why it is such. No good.

  • @Chinmoy-Saha
    @Chinmoy-Saha 2 роки тому

    Kire bangir put, eta integration diya korli na kn?

  • @tye2953
    @tye2953 3 роки тому

    Slow down ffs,

  • @maadhavsharma4055
    @maadhavsharma4055 8 років тому +5

    good video