DUNE is finally a good movie - A Magic Hour Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 чер 2024
  • After two bad translations to the silver screen and many false starts, director Denis Villeneuve has finally made a version of Dune that's well acted, entertaining, and beautiful. This is a Magic Hour with Paul Chapel review!
    Magic Hour with Paul Chapel is a show dedicated primarily to movies, movie rumors and all things Hollywood and Disney. If you love reviewers like Chris Stuckman, Kevin Smith and Jeremy Jahns, you'll love this channel!
    Our Channel Direct Link:
    / paulchapelmagic
    Our Social Media:
    / paulchapel
    / magicpowerhour
    / paul.chapel
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 14

  • @baraka99
    @baraka99 2 роки тому +1

    Dune is a beautiful interpretation of the novel. The scenes he sacrificed gave room to a deep world full of nuance, detail and intensity. A profound visual and auditory experience on iMax.

    • @PaulChapelMagic
      @PaulChapelMagic  2 роки тому +1

      Glad to hear from someone who read the book! Thanks!

    • @baraka99
      @baraka99 2 роки тому +1

      @@PaulChapelMagic The movie experience blew my mind. I haven't felt this from a movie in a long long time.

    • @PaulChapelMagic
      @PaulChapelMagic  2 роки тому +1

      @@baraka99 Me as well. Science Fiction has been pretty stagnant, but this felt cool and new.

    • @znapiwe
      @znapiwe 2 роки тому

      @@baraka99 g

  • @obscuresoundz
    @obscuresoundz 2 роки тому +1

    agree that Patrick Steward did Gurney better; more theatrical dialogue

    • @PaulChapelMagic
      @PaulChapelMagic  2 роки тому

      I have a greater appreciation for the David Lynch movie mpw. Another thing that I should have mentioned is that the music in the Lynch version was more memorable than this version, but it was still a superior film in almost every other way.

    • @obscuresoundz
      @obscuresoundz 2 роки тому +2

      @@PaulChapelMagic i walked out the cinema this movie looks good but is trash

    • @PaulChapelMagic
      @PaulChapelMagic  2 роки тому

      @@obscuresoundz Why do you think it's trash? Explain please.

    • @obscuresoundz
      @obscuresoundz 2 роки тому +1

      @@PaulChapelMagic film pace was an issue; the wrong scenes were drawn out; while other scenes needed to develop characters were short or cut; some of the dialogue was poor, alot of coincidental plot developments made certain aspects of story telling appear lazy, i'd say from the invasion inwards the movie got bad so I left, it was passable up until that point.

    • @PaulChapelMagic
      @PaulChapelMagic  2 роки тому

      @@obscuresoundz Ok, I agree that some of the dialogue wasn't stellar, but I didn't know if it was representative of the book or not. I did point out the scene with Gurney and how it was better in the David Lynch version, but movies are primarily a visual experience and dialogue is notoriously hard to write because people aren't that articulate in real life, so anything you do write as dialogue will be the most contrived thing in any movie. Thanks for sharing!

  • @etiennelanglois6457
    @etiennelanglois6457 2 роки тому +1

    I stop watching when he said that Denis Villeneuve is a strange name. Wtf

    • @PaulChapelMagic
      @PaulChapelMagic  2 роки тому

      It's a normal name? Since when? Maybe in France.

  • @jeronimomod156
    @jeronimomod156 2 роки тому

    I still like the original