I’ve been flying for almost 6 years and never really bothered with “black box”. I recently built a 7” AOS I couldn’t tune myself. Someone online had been gracious enough to help tune via black box recordings. Can you do a video on what settings should be set up on black box. I’m using Inav black box for this build but all my other quads are BF, I’d like to delve more into black box. Shame on me for not doing this sooner! 😢
Excellent! Thank you. Would love a full filter video. Coming from an audio engineering background, I know what the filters are doing, but some of the controls in BF are structured differently. Would be great if you could highlight a suitable starting point from which to perform further tuning.
Amazing the quad did not freak out on the first test. How does the wobble script keep that quad on one spot? I would not trust anything in house like that besides my own control. It sure looks nice!
So maybe if you are prone to bashing props you could tune 250q with 50 weight so rpm filter would have wider target area to be able to handle the noise of chewed up props?
i think it's the opposite. if you bang up your props you need rpm filters more. If your quad is clean enough and doesn't need as much filtering, you can ease up on the filtering as described here.
@TimeFadesMemoryLasts yes but you can widen the q to hit the areas thst might not have been there with clean props. And have some delay by lowering the % attenuation. Idk?
@@JLfpv unbalance in the prop always sits right at the RPM number (and its harmonics). If you cut off a blade, the noise will still be at the same values of a pristine prop, it's just that the noise peak will be a lot higher but it should not be broader. But on second thought: In practice, because of the changed aerodynamics, maybe you have additional vibrations in the bent/broken prop that's coming from the additional turbulences which is causing broader RPM peaks...
![☀ RPM фильтрация для чайников. Настройка Betaflight 4.0, тест. [Betaflight RPM Filter]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Gt6mJBidEVM/mqdefault.jpg)
Amazing,thank you so much for helping out
Thx man. The data in the blackbox is great while the tool and methodology of getting insights from the data is equally or even more great.
Awesome, thank you very much for the detailed explanation!
Now that's detail , great video 👍
Great work, like always! Now I know what to do on Sundays with bad weather.
I’ve been flying for almost 6 years and never really bothered with “black box”. I recently built a 7” AOS I couldn’t tune myself. Someone online had been gracious enough to help tune via black box recordings. Can you do a video on what settings should be set up on black box. I’m using Inav black box for this build but all my other quads are BF, I’d like to delve more into black box. Shame on me for not doing this sooner! 😢
Excellent! Thank you. Would love a full filter video. Coming from an audio engineering background, I know what the filters are doing, but some of the controls in BF are structured differently. Would be great if you could highlight a suitable starting point from which to perform further tuning.
Amazing video, very interesting
As always very informative and well presented. Thank you.
Very helpful! Many thanks Brian
Thats great I think I need to look at the wobble method to take data for filter setup, because it looks very clean and interpretable...
It’s pretty cool. Works well on radiomaster zorro with convenient momentary switches
WOW very deep. You seem to enjoy it. How about a bunch of presets. Love the info. Thanks
Great expiation Brian 👌
very good video Brian as usual
Great show and tell. 👍
great info, thanks for sharing. You the man
Great, thank you.
Great video, thanks
Excellence
4:23 @PIDtoolbox Is that an Openracer build ?
Indeed
Thanks.
Hi, I'm having trouble activating the PID on my plane... I can't get the other options to work."
Can someone help me out?"
its great , thanks man.
Amazing the quad did not freak out on the first test. How does the wobble script keep that quad on one spot? I would not trust anything in house like that besides my own control. It sure looks nice!
Level mode with a sine input
@@PIDtoolbox works wonders! I assume you give small stick inputs yourself to keep the quad steady.
@@helidude71 yes you still have full control over position
Do you use the wobble log for adjusting the filter weights?
You can to some degree but still best to double confirm with a subsequent throttle ramp in the field. But certainly a good starting point
Nice !
qua tuyet voi thanks
Holly cown. That Nice
So maybe if you are prone to bashing props you could tune 250q with 50 weight so rpm filter would have wider target area to be able to handle the noise of chewed up props?
i think it's the opposite. if you bang up your props you need rpm filters more.
If your quad is clean enough and doesn't need as much filtering, you can ease up on the filtering as described here.
I think DNs are always ideal for that
@TimeFadesMemoryLasts yes but you can widen the q to hit the areas thst might not have been there with clean props. And have some delay by lowering the % attenuation. Idk?
@@PIDtoolbox thanks.
@@JLfpv unbalance in the prop always sits right at the RPM number (and its harmonics). If you cut off a blade, the noise will still be at the same values of a pristine prop, it's just that the noise peak will be a lot higher but it should not be broader.
But on second thought: In practice, because of the changed aerodynamics, maybe you have additional vibrations in the bent/broken prop that's coming from the additional turbulences which is causing broader RPM peaks...
Is yaw filtered by RPM? Or should it be 2 axes?
Yes it is
So freaking hard to understand all this stuff) My brain is melting