Israel - Hamas conflict! Von der Leyen debates what Gaza might look like ‘the day after’ the war
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 жов 2024
- Subscribe here: bit.ly/eudebates Less than a week after Hamas’s devastating attacks on October 7, Israel’s intelligence ministry produced a chilling document. It advocated that Israel remove all of Gaza’s Palestinian population and forcibly resettle them in the Egyptian Sinai Peninsula.
In November, a poster advertising a far-right rally in Tel Aviv juxtaposed an image of two cherubic Jewish-Israeli children on a beach (presumably in a vision of a future Gaza) with the ominous policy prescriptions of “occupy, expel, settle”.
Most worryingly, a cabinet minister suggested that Israel could use nuclear weapons against the Gaza Strip. Does this bellicose and dehumanising rhetoric suggest that Israel’s long-term plan for Gaza is to ethnically cleanse the territory, or even commit genocide there?
There is scant evidence that Israel’s government has any intent or capability to achieve these unsettling goals. Israel’s regional and international partners - Egypt and the US - steadfastly reject any population transfer. Jordan has gone further, claiming that any such policy would constitute a “declaration of war”.
Turnout at the far-right Tel Aviv rally was negligible, and neither the minister who considered “nuking” Gaza, nor the intelligence ministry, have any tangible input in Israel’s national security decision-making.
What is more likely is that Israel will indefinitely occupy parts of Gaza, while seeking to eschew responsibility for civilian governance elsewhere in the territory. Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, himself claimed that “we don’t seek to govern Gaza”, but added that the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) should have “overall security responsibility” in the territory for “an indefinite period”.
This strategy is unsurprising, given that Israel has pursued it in all of its diverse occupations to date. These experiences provide a projection of what Israel’s planned “day after Hamas” scenario in Gaza might look like.
The day after
First, Israel is unlikely to control Gaza’s urban areas for long. Israel baulks at managing everyday governance in an occupied territory and will refrain from overseeing Gaza’s health, education and welfare ministries, for example. Similarly, IDF planners know that a prolonged military presence in a dense urban area would be an operational nightmare.
Secondly, Israel may restore its attachment to “strategic depth”, a doctrine that seeks to take and indefinitely hold sparsely populated foreign territory. The idea is to keep any fighting outside of Israel itself. Israel is a small country that has gone to war with all its neighbours and as a result has felt safer the more territory it holds beyond its recognised borders.
Taken together, the doctrine of strategic depth and Israel’s desire to detach itself from civilian governance suggest that the IDF will seek to indefinitely occupy some, but not all, of Gaza.
There is growing evidence of what this might look like. Israel’s defence minister, Yoav Gallant, called for a permanent “buffer zone” to the west of the Gaza-Israel border. Deeper inside Gaza, the IDF has bisected the territory and besieged its cities, while avoiding a prolonged presence within them.
The problem with this twin strategy can be seen in Israel’s previous experiences in Gaza, which suggests it has rarely met Israel’s security goals.
Bitter experience
Before it withdrew in 2005, Israel occupied about 20% of the sparsely populated but operationally valuable parts of the Gaza Strip, including access roads and strategic positions close to the border. It ceded the urban areas within most of the remaining 80% of the territory to the Palestinian Authority (PA) back in the early 1990s.
Strategic depth also failed to shield Israeli civilians. Despite the IDF occupation of 20% of Gaza, Hamas’ rockets were easily able to fly over the IDF soldiers and into Israel itself.
Simultaneously, Israel avoiding responsibility for Gaza’s civilian governance could allow Hamas to retake power. The Biden administration has encouraged Israel to empower the PA within Gaza’s urban areas. Yet, Israel’s far-right government will reject ceding governance to the PA, given that this would make a Palestinian state more likely.
Stay connected with us!
Facebook: / eudebates.tv
Twitter: / eudebates
Instagram: / eudebates.tv
#eudebates the unique initiative aiming to promote debate, dialogue, knowledge, participation and communication among citizens. #Israel #Gaza #truce #hostages #Palestine #hostage #Netanyahu #Jerusalem #Palestinians #MiddleEast #gazawar #Hamas #war #VonderLeyen #Hamas #massacre #israelpalestineconflict #israelhamaswar
And how will the aid go in without a ceasefire? I don't understand how she stands in front of people with a straight face...
Why isn't she talking about international laws? Isn't there a UN resolution? Are both parties respecting that resolution? Or suddenly international laws are not that important anymore? It looks like Putin was right all along in how he described European leaders.
Shame on you
This wich think that she will decide something in the future of Palestine
Lady Ursula same think like UK, USA, Canada, Australia etc. From free western democracy view, we have order in coordination, she dont want be first, she only represent our EU western democracy. Hope near future yes free Israel and Palestinian but only in democracy rulle, only way which be garanty for peace. When people understand that they will understand Israel way of survaive. Israel only need reall democracy peace like garanty for peacefull existance and straregic peace. Who want war? Democratic Country NO. Israel is Democracy.
@@antel704 I do not know from wich "democracy" country you are but she do not represent me and my countrie
Israel is not democracy but apartheid state with a long list of war crimes at we speack.
@@abc-mf8rrIsrael have right to defend soveregnity inside own border, and right for answer from any attack inside or outside. Israel have History rights for exist. Israels people Jewies and Palestinian are hostages long long time of part greatarabian history domination politics what made terorist and on that way long time blocking win win western democracy solution. Now many wonder what hapening when but nothing did to recognised problem. Israel is reall democracy but not in relaxing comforbly peacefully position couse from begining must defending own exist. Israel is not ocupied anybody its only haters talk, Israel form strategic position for basic exist of own Nation, couse have no democracy sourranding.Even terorist exist all past time Palestinian people can workin in Israel. UN and world turning constantly had to see that cruelly truth what Israel passing through. And now I need explaine that to you couse you dont want understand basic thing of western democracy and freedom after ww2.
I forget as an Croatian wery well know what are greatserbian and greatotoman history fucking politics now we are free in EU NATO on way to better standard.
Lier
And europe should be governed from africa tomorrow onwards 😅
2 states is the reality of time now.
This woman has some nerve, who the hell is she deciding what is to be done en Palestine, this people still think that Europe is in charge of their colonies keep dreaming lady, the world has change, get with the program.
Are you a god
We all knows that war is big big tragedy. This is cearly true and honest speech from lady Ursula.
are you serious?