"Air Combat in the Falklands" by David Smith

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 жов 2024
  • David Smith was a Lieutenant in the Royal Navy in 1982 and served onboard HMS Hermes in 800 Naval Air Squadron flying the Sea Harrier FRS1. David was involved in two air combat actions in which he shot down a Mirage V and an A4 Skyhawk.
    This presentation was hosted by the Aviation Historical Society of Australia (Qld) Inc. at Archerfield Airport on Friday 24 February 2023.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 41

  • @jimramsey8887
    @jimramsey8887 Рік тому +8

    Just a brilliant presentation describing heroism, bravery, respect and Fun in an horrendous conflict using magnificent equipment. Thanks very much for the video.

  • @anonnemo2504
    @anonnemo2504 10 місяців тому +1

    Thanks for such a fascinating presentation, Mr. Smith, and many thanks for your heroic service.

  • @jacksprat9172
    @jacksprat9172 Рік тому +10

    I remember rushing home from school as a 12 year old boy in '82 to get the latest news of the task force and the Harriers in particular. I'm still fascinated by that aircraft and I hope its kept flying for a good few years yet. A shame we no longer have them in the UK. Many thanks to the Aviation Historical Society of Australia and to David in particular, I suspect there were quite a few 12 year old boys in the audience!

    • @shirleydrury5565
      @shirleydrury5565 11 місяців тому

      Same here remember it well.

    • @charak100able
      @charak100able 11 місяців тому

      I was ten

    • @pontiacGXPfan
      @pontiacGXPfan 3 місяці тому

      Blame the Americans. Our country sold you that shitheap F35 Lightning

  • @jcsixties422
    @jcsixties422 4 місяці тому +1

    Very interesting talk - Heard some of this first hand in Tamar Wardroom 83 but recall 40 years later is fantastic.

  • @Berry-fr5wj
    @Berry-fr5wj 9 місяців тому +1

    Absolutely fascinating

  • @patrick764
    @patrick764 Рік тому +5

    Great stories. I love the detail.

  • @anselmdanker9519
    @anselmdanker9519 Рік тому +3

    Thank you for this presentation of your experience. Thank you for your service.

  • @humrv7
    @humrv7 7 місяців тому +1

    Looking good Dave! Great talk 😊 Hum

  • @shirleydrury5565
    @shirleydrury5565 11 місяців тому +1

    Thank you for this really enjoyed 😊❤

  • @chandrachurniyogi8394
    @chandrachurniyogi8394 Місяць тому +1

    speaking of armed carrier borne Sea Harrier GR3 VTOL multi role all weather strike interceptor . . . mission time on CAP could have been extended with the help of VC-10 K.2 multi mission mid-air refuelling tanker aircraft . . .

  • @aldoreneliguera9254
    @aldoreneliguera9254 Рік тому +5

    fuiste un soldado, un gran piloto, pero me dejaste sin mi amigo Primer Teniente Ruben Bolzán, igualmente le mando un gran abrazo..

    • @dutchbrotherfan1284
      @dutchbrotherfan1284 Рік тому +3

      Your friend Ruben Bolzan memories will always be there. Sad that war does this . But he was doing his mission and the risk is always with them even in peaceful times.

    • @johnnypickles5256
      @johnnypickles5256 3 місяці тому

      La junta te dejo sin Tu amigo desafotunadamente, qué descanse en Paz

  • @serverlan763
    @serverlan763 Місяць тому

    Could Harrier Sidewinders distinguish between friendly and enemy aircraft?

  • @philipcrabtree1679
    @philipcrabtree1679 8 місяців тому +1

    If David had read Sharkey’s book it was Sharkey who saw the enemy aircraft first but realised the 800 aircraft were closer and asked the FAC to vector the 800 aircraft to the targets.
    I find David misses out a number of key attacks that happened during the conflict. I was part of 801 Sqdn on HMS Invincible throughout the conflict and post surrender operating aircraft from Stanley Airfield on CAP.

  • @MadAdventure919
    @MadAdventure919 11 місяців тому +2

    The British had 13 ships where the bombs did not detonate because they were dropped at low altitude. One of the commanders said in an interview that if the bombs had detonated it would have been the end of the war.

    • @mikeycraig8970
      @mikeycraig8970 11 місяців тому +2

      It was never going to be the end of the war. Troops were already ashore.

    • @masterscubaman
      @masterscubaman 11 місяців тому +1

      33 bombs didn't detonate on 3 ships. Doesn't mean they would have resulted in the loss of the ship. Source - imperial war museum London.

    • @paulmarchant9231
      @paulmarchant9231 11 місяців тому +1

      There were many contingency plans for what if situations, and many complications... for example the winter was fast approaching and operations needed to be completed quickly. It was always expected that we would lose warships, especially as they were deliberately being used as pawns taking the brunt of the attacks to protect the landing ships ( if they were intended to protect landings with their missiles they would have been placed in open water where their radar wouldn't be trying to see through mountains). The main thing about losing ships was the question of which ships.There is no way we were going to lose , there was another new carrier hurriedly being prepared , HMS Illustrious, the old Bulwark had already been rejected but could be reconsidered, not forgetting that Reagan had offered an American carrier if we should need it.

  • @arcbennett
    @arcbennett 8 місяців тому +1

    David, this is a terrific tale - one that I've never before heard, despite us joining Hawke Division together in 1973. I would really love to get in touch again - how can I send you my email address (other than adding it here)?
    Wiggy, 846 Sqn, HMS HERMES 1982 et al.

    • @smi6086
      @smi6086 8 місяців тому

      Hi Wiggy. Great to hear from you. I'm trying to figure a way of exchanging email addresses without using this platform and all that would entail! Do you do Facebook?

    • @ozatwar
      @ozatwar  8 місяців тому

      Wiggy can you please go to my web site at www.ozatwar.com and find my email address at the bottom of that page and send me an email and I'll put you in touch with David.

  • @AA-xo9uw
    @AA-xo9uw Рік тому +1

    Some sources indicate that Smith downed a Dagger A, not a Mirage V, on 24 May. He bagged an A-4B on 8 June. The Argies lost two Mirage IIIEAs on 1 May. The ten Mirage Vs from Peru didn't arrive at Tandil until 4 June and weren't used before the surrender on 14 June..

    • @brunol-p_g8800
      @brunol-p_g8800 11 місяців тому +3

      Mirage 5, not Mirage V. It is a common mistake, but it was named in and used Arab numbers not Roman numbers. It was a cheaper and simplified Mirage III asked by the Israelis, without the poursuit Cyrano radar but instead with more fuel and weapons used for clear skies attack. In the end following the Beyrouth airport attack by Israel, France placed an embargo on Israel and Israel ended up producing a copy named Nasher/Dagger.

    • @captainbligh3894
      @captainbligh3894 4 місяці тому

      The Israeli-built Mirage V, also called the Dagger, was fast and well maintained but had no aerial refueling system, electronic countermeasures, or inertial navigation system. Argentina's pilots ...

  • @krisspradlin715
    @krisspradlin715 11 місяців тому +1

    Mermaid = Siren

  • @johnt.848
    @johnt.848 11 місяців тому

    Las Malvinas, until Colonialist dogs stole it.

    • @CB-fz3li
      @CB-fz3li 11 місяців тому +2

      Las Malvinas, a derivation of the French Malouines I believe. Not at all linked to European colonialism.

    • @paulmarchant9231
      @paulmarchant9231 11 місяців тому

      Malvinas Islands, I do believe you will find in Chile

    • @CH-lc3yf
      @CH-lc3yf 10 місяців тому +1

      Oh, the natives spoke spanish?

    • @AndrewStead-wv4po
      @AndrewStead-wv4po 10 місяців тому +5

      the land that is now known as Argentina, belonged to the Diaguita people, until Spain and Argentina stole that land!!..

    • @Berry-fr5wj
      @Berry-fr5wj 9 місяців тому

      @@AndrewStead-wv4po Ignore the prat

  • @peterstubbs5934
    @peterstubbs5934 Рік тому

    Not a patch on 801 Sqn.