DJI pocket 3 for real estate videos? | This was interesting 🧐

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
  • Get the Pocket 3 here and save on the taxes drone-works.co...
    Get Your Part 107 & Start Making 💵 Money 💵 With Your Drone👇🏻
    Part 107: pilotinstitute...
    Other Pilot Instiitute Courses 👇🏻
    🗺️ 📍 Mapping: pilotinstitute...
    📸🏠 Real Estate: pilotinstitute...
    🍺 JOIN THE BREW CREW TO GET ACCESS TO PERKS: 🍺
    / @originaldobo
    ==========================================
    My Design Store
    www.OriginaldoBoStore.com
    ==========================================
    ♪♪ Like the Music? Hit the link and checkout Artlist the provider of all the tracks you here on the channel. bit.ly/2A3sLYN ♪♪
    👕 Buy all my merch "basically just a shirt but its super posh!" teespring.com/... 👕
    My Latest Gear Here: www.amazon.com...
    Official Brand Partner: www.Drone-Work...
    SOCIAL
    ==========================================
    🐦 Twitter - / originaldobo
    📸 Instagram - / originaldobo
    👥 Facebook - / originaldobo
    🎧 Podcast/Live Show - / @flighttimecast
    ==========================================
    📅 Upcoming events vist www.Originaldo... 📅
    🔥 Like what I do? Consider buying me a coffee ☕
    www.buymeacoff...
    👇People keep asking so here is the most current gear I use👇
    📷 NEW CAMERA SETUP 📷
    📷 Sony A7IV amzn.to/3MhxPc1 A-Cam
    📷 Sony FX3 amzn.to/3M0KDmU B-Cam
    📷 Sony A7iii - amzn.to/35DCu5h Real Estate Photo Camera
    🎥 Tamron 17-28 amzn.to/3Lemyb7
    🎥 Tamron 28-75 amzn.to/3M8V8Vm
    🎤 Mic In Studio - amzn.to/38fUnpW
    🎤 Mic out doors - amzn.to/2qu7pim
    🎤 Lav Mic amzn.to/3sqIBEB
    "OLD CAMERAS"
    📷 Panasonic S5 amzn.to/39F2ilA
    📷 Sony A6600 amzn.to/2ZJ2kkF
    🎥 Other Lenses: 🎥
    🛒 Sony 14mm F1.8 amzn.to/3yoomvj
    🛒 Sony 12-24 F4 amzn.to/395gG6s
    🛒 Sony 16-35 F4 amzn.to/3L0pasS
    🎤 Audio: 🎤
    🛒 Audio-Technica AT875R Shotgun Mic - amzn.to/38fUnpW
    🛒 Rode Wireless Go - amzn.to/2qu7pim
    🛒 Deity VLav - amzn.to/2Pl92aI
    🛒 Rode VideoMicro - amzn.to/2QuQi7z
    🛒 Takstar SG598 - amzn.to/2xY3LOl
    🛒 Zoom H1 - amzn.to/2OwH6lQ
    🔭 Camera Accessories: 🔭
    🛒 DJI RSC-2 Gimbal - drone-works.co...
    🛒 Benro Mach3 4 Series Tripod - amzn.to/3c0AqFP
    🛒 Benro 3-Way Gear head - amzn.to/3iAEpLB
    🛒 FocusFoto P50 Quick Release - amzn.to/2RvhmWK
    🛒 Godox AD200 Flash - amzn.to/2ZEfZJC
    🛒 Godox AD-S2 Standard Reflector - amzn.to/3km1qTc
    🛒 Godox AD400 Pro amzn.to/3kY36Ve
    🚁 Drones I use: 🚁
    🛒 Mavic 3 - amzn.to/3MejjRW My Daily Flyer
    🛒 Autel Evo Lite - amzn.to/3FuUuPr Backup Drone
    🛒 Autel EVO - amzn.to/3spNsGp
    🛒 DJI FPV Drone - amzn.to/3N35vKb Most Fun Drone
    ****************************************************
    # # # # #Osmopocket3 #realestatevideographer #realestatevideo
    ****************************************************
    ** All video and audio content created by myself and or used with permission from the creator.
    ** Affiliate disclaimer: some of the above links maybe affiliate links, which may generate me a sales commission. For example, my UA-cam Gear listed above is in association with the Amazon affiliate program and I’m an amazon associate **

КОМЕНТАРІ • 270

  • @OriginaldoBo
    @OriginaldoBo  11 місяців тому +10

    Big thanks to www.frankalbertrealty.com for letting me film this comparison while actually working 😂 show FAR Realty some love on insta
    Pocket now instock at my store drone-works.com/dji-osmo-pocket-3-creator-combo/

  • @Ozpeter
    @Ozpeter 11 місяців тому +37

    Well, watching on a cheap laptop (as clients might do...) I actually thought the Pocket 3 footage "sold" the house more than the other camera. It looked a bit more colourful and punchy to me. My overall response is that the chances of the Pocket 3 losing you a sale would be pretty small - even if the other camera's results were technically better. But I'm not in the business (though my son is!).
    But... If I was making a video to sell a house, I'd approach it very differently if I was using the FX3 vs the Pocket 3. You did mention how the lack of a tilting screen was a problem with the Pocket 3 and how you could "hold a phone in your other hand" to get around that, but that's not the best option by a long chalk.
    I don't know whether you ever used the Pocket 2 on the official extension rod with its physical buttons on the lower end of the rod, where the phone can be clamped on, but that's almost the only way that I use my Pocket 2 - it takes the creative possibilities to a whole new level. I believe that's a forthcoming accessory for the Pocket 3 - I really hope so! Meanwhile, it's very easy to put together a pole with a phone clamp on the bottom, fixing the Pocket 3 to the top end of the pole via the tripod mount attachment they supply. Deploying that would be quite a bit faster than deploying a full size gimbal, I would expect - one minute? Then you've got creative opportunities which a standard gimbal and normal-sized camera just doesn't offer.
    So what would be interesting would be to compare not only the picture quality vs the FX3 but also the creative possibilities of the two. Instead of shooting a close-to-identical video using the Pocket 3, set it up on a pole and shoot a completely different one. Then see which would be the most likely to have commercial success and client appeal. (For instance, fly across the pool. Walk up to a barely open window and go right inside, or the reverse - back out and pan round the garden. Lift the camera up into that high roof space and glide down. And so forth). But here I am, happily spending hours of your precious time!

    • @Shiffyphoto
      @Shiffyphoto 5 днів тому +1

      @@Ozpeter great feedback and insight! I’m a RE Photographer trying to incorporate video. Going to try some of your ideas with my new pocket 3!

  • @formattester6
    @formattester6 11 місяців тому +4

    im in the same boat with a bunch of 4k bodies and 3 different gimbals. the sony is absolutely more detailed and looks more expensive but...i am on a 43" 4k computer monitor and i can see the difference but if i watch it on my iPhone or iPad the difference is negligible IMO. i have a spa that im shooting at the end of the month and plan to use the pocket 3. i may sell some of my real camera gear if the pocket works out.

    • @samrei6223
      @samrei6223 14 днів тому

      @@formattester6 did you end up switching to the pocket 3?

  • @JonathanPalfrey
    @JonathanPalfrey 11 місяців тому +1

    Looks really good. I agree it doesn’t need over exposing, I think at a lower exposure they’d match even better. The most noticeable difference to me was how it handled the tungsten lights. They were blown and pretty yellow, lights off might work better for the pocket 3 to avoid mixing white balances.

  • @markjackson7566
    @markjackson7566 11 місяців тому +1

    I've seen several reviews with vloging and night shots, but this is the one I was waiting for! Thank you for another great Video.

  • @jorgenudvang3507
    @jorgenudvang3507 11 місяців тому +3

    Finally a review that sees potential for real estate for the Pocket 3. I'm doing yacht photography, and see this as a very interesting tool for the notoriously tight spaces onboard yachts. At bathrooms and other rooms with many mirrors, I would also be able to place the Osmo on a monopod in a corner, leave the room and do pans using the mobile app. Although that is technically doable with any camera/drone combinations, they require more room and are more of a hassle to set up.
    Another thing is that 180 grams vs. 1.8 kilograms which is what my current gimbal/camera/lens combination weighs, means that I will be less tired, stay concentrated longer, and making fewer mistakes towards the end of the day.
    Thank you for a good and very useful review.

  • @Watcheyes
    @Watcheyes 10 місяців тому

    It's not often you see a revolutionary product but since 10 years ago when Sony released A7s and now when pocket 3 is released we are here again, a revolutionary product!

  • @BenjaminGib
    @BenjaminGib Місяць тому +1

    Freaking love this video. I’m looking to get an Osmo pocket three, and also want to use it for real estate. So thank you for showing it head to head.

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  Місяць тому

      Thanks for giving it a watch 🙌🏻

  • @TimothyDowd
    @TimothyDowd 11 місяців тому +4

    DJI Pocket 3 all the way

  • @ForjdAmerica
    @ForjdAmerica 11 місяців тому +1

    Honestly, the Pocket 3 looks great. It will definitely work for projects like this.

  • @Peachhy1
    @Peachhy1 11 місяців тому +3

    Can you compare the pocket 3 to iPhone 15 pro?

  • @theuktoday4233
    @theuktoday4233 9 місяців тому

    I've filmed inside large retail stores many times usually with a 360 camera but now I have bought the pocket 3 I will be using it next time as it will make the job so much easier and faster, It looks very pro on your video!

  • @whistlerrealestate1
    @whistlerrealestate1 11 місяців тому

    I'm a realtor and I've been shooting my own videos for years. Currently on an iPhone 14 Pro with an Osmo 4 gimbal. I previously had a Pocket 2 but the footage was garbage compared my iPhone 14 Pro. I just ordered the Pocket 3 and it looks like the footage will be at least as good as my iPhone 14 Pro but will be WAY less fiddly to deal with the iPhone + gimbal pain in the ass situation when I just want to get into a house and get the shots I need quickly or if I want to shoot a quick UA-cam Short or IG Reel.

  • @Joe_Fotoleo
    @Joe_Fotoleo 11 місяців тому +1

    Nice review, Ken. I've never been an osmo pocket guy, but I can see adding this one day. The 1" sensor makes it so much better than the 2, which a buddy has and that I've used quite a bit. Thanks for the tech info, dude!

  • @VincentDelacruzMusic
    @VincentDelacruzMusic 10 місяців тому

    Ayeee Frank Albert is a beast. I’m from Tampa. I was watching this video thinking it looked very similar to his videographer’s video style 😉

  • @greg1920061
    @greg1920061 11 місяців тому +1

    I fuck with you because you keep it real and also teach us how to become entrepreneurs

  • @guillrponce9243
    @guillrponce9243 3 місяці тому

    cool soundtrack bro! nice comparission! thanks

  • @rezvanbagheri1901
    @rezvanbagheri1901 6 місяців тому

    Thank you, the video was great
    Please tell me what effect you used when transitioning from outside to inside

  • @skinbones
    @skinbones 11 місяців тому

    sharpness and highlights are a big difference between them

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  11 місяців тому

      Sharpness is miss perceived everyone seems to believe sharper is better it’s not the case. Digital sharpening looks like shit

  • @alfredoalvarez3837
    @alfredoalvarez3837 11 місяців тому +1

    i assure you that i make a tv commercial with the osmo and no one would tell me that i did it with that little camera. incredible.

  • @ashstonk
    @ashstonk 11 місяців тому

    Very very close apart the dynamic range where on the pocket 3, the windows are a little bit blown out it’s super close.

  • @d.g.666
    @d.g.666 11 місяців тому

    u switched to the first responder stache' eh? But seriously, this is a great comparison vid! You say the sony slog 3 is unbeatable but in the side by side vid, the osmo is pulling out more detail. Both cams seem almost same but little details i noticed better with the osmo. Look at the side by side when theres the wood table. You can see the grain and rings in the osmo vid but barely anything with the sony.

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  11 місяців тому

      Dynamic range is unmatched on SLOG3 detail and fake sharpness on the Osmo doesn’t count as “detail”

  • @DimmyV
    @DimmyV 11 місяців тому

    Not the DJI Pocket 3 was terrible, but you can see the difference with the Sony FX3.

  • @WindWalkerDrones
    @WindWalkerDrones 11 місяців тому

    Definitely good enough for the realtors in my area

  • @intrinsicimagery
    @intrinsicimagery 10 місяців тому

    Perfect is the enemy of done. 90 percent of real estate “films” will be consumed once or twice on a phone.

  • @machinegundroner9411
    @machinegundroner9411 11 місяців тому

    I've been thinking about getting the osmo 3. It seems like a great little camera.

  • @vivanbhathena999
    @vivanbhathena999 8 місяців тому

    Did u use it for vertical footage

  • @naizondj
    @naizondj 2 місяці тому

    Question: if i ask around all the real estate if they need any video could i use my osmo pocket 3? Or they will take me no serious?🙏

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  2 місяці тому +1

      you can totally get away with using it

    • @naizondj
      @naizondj Місяць тому

      @@OriginaldoBo but i really want to get the so y a6700 as is the only camera cheap that allow me to do photos and videos.. im right?

  • @charliedcho
    @charliedcho 10 місяців тому

    Damn. That is impressive

  • @tauzins
    @tauzins 6 місяців тому

    Curious what lens was used on the fx3?

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  6 місяців тому

      14mm for wide shots , detail 28-75

    • @tauzins
      @tauzins 6 місяців тому

      @@OriginaldoBo appreciate it!

  • @robertsanchez4380
    @robertsanchez4380 3 місяці тому

    On the osmo I notice I can shoot on its regular video moved which is 30FPS of Slo Mo which shows 8x. which do you recommend for Real estate interior?

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  3 місяці тому

      I usually film real estate on the inside at 60 frames so that way I can slow it down if I need to it also helps remove some of the vibrations and jitter you may create

    • @robertsanchez4380
      @robertsanchez4380 3 місяці тому

      @@OriginaldoBo Can you set the Osmo to 60 frames?

  • @ChuckD05
    @ChuckD05 11 місяців тому

    Is that one inch sensor going to end up on an air3 pro ?

  • @lambo_drives
    @lambo_drives 11 місяців тому

    Great demonstration showing capabilities 👏🏻👏🏻
    0:13 I am so ashamed that I think you wear that mustache so well. I am crying, on the inside, so much inner conflict; so much.

    • @lambo_drives
      @lambo_drives 11 місяців тому

      The Sony appeared Richer; however the Pocket made the space seem BRIGHTER... .... hmm both worked but now I see difference in styling

  • @alfashion
    @alfashion 6 місяців тому

    Come on, if you didn't know what camera the footage came, you wouldn't have known

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  6 місяців тому

      Um no I definitely can tell the difference. And if I couldn’t tell the difference, I shouldn’t be in this industry. That’s what separates me from anybody else if you already don’t know I’m the undisputed champion of blind camera test.

    • @alfashion
      @alfashion 6 місяців тому

      @@OriginaldoBo there is absolutely no way you can tell. You wouldn't be able to tell 1080 from 4k.

  • @nyrep1
    @nyrep1 11 місяців тому +59

    I am one of those real estate agents that does their own content. Currently using the pocket 1, and galaxy s22 ultra and Hohem mt2. Looks like the pocket will blow away my current setup and simplify my life

    • @cuve_ae
      @cuve_ae 9 місяців тому +3

      Most definitely, when I was a realtor I used the phone gimbal with an iPhone. Having something like a pocket 1-3 would’ve been so much easier.

  • @thefowlyetti2
    @thefowlyetti2 11 місяців тому +6

    The main point in this video is admitting that no one who's viewing the video professionally cares about the minor difference in dynamic range. Therefore there's no reason to use the expensive Sony cinema camera.

  • @RoguePainter
    @RoguePainter 10 місяців тому +10

    I’ve got the pocket 3 last week and used it a few times. I love it. Massive upgrade on the pocket 2 and I liked that. Yes it isn’t going to perform like a 5k camera and lenses do on a pro gimble. But in all honesty by the time you have set up your expensive kit I’ve finished my video and the difference in the final product isn’t that big on most scenario’s

  • @jakenotfromstatefarm
    @jakenotfromstatefarm 11 місяців тому +18

    Those transitions were sick bro! 🤯

  • @PhotoByPope
    @PhotoByPope 11 місяців тому +13

    I tested the Pocket 3 at one of my RE shoots today and was quite impressed overall. In my market fast and cheap is the name of the game and the Pocket 3 seems like a good tool for that so far, certainly for a budget video option for agents. I'd love a little more dynamic range in the windows but, again, as a budget option it could be a winner.

  • @thrumyeyesphoto
    @thrumyeyesphoto 11 місяців тому +19

    The Osmo Pocket 3 looks surprisingly good! I’m impressed. I had the original version but sold it a while back. This looks like a huge upgrade.

    • @XudenGroupLLC
      @XudenGroupLLC 11 місяців тому

      I agree and had the original and the battery died. It's non-reparable also.

    • @ChristiaanRoest79
      @ChristiaanRoest79 11 місяців тому +1

      The original one had a very bad autofocus.

    • @PopoRamos
      @PopoRamos 11 місяців тому +1

      @@XudenGroupLLCinteresting, my original is still kicking with minimal loss in capacity. But I really only used it a few times a year

    • @kenjiyamamoto423
      @kenjiyamamoto423 10 місяців тому

      @@XudenGroupLLC yea mor0n, compared the price of FX3 price, the lense, and the gimbal price,. Stupd!

  • @RonaldBrown59
    @RonaldBrown59 11 місяців тому +10

    It's amazing how the Pocket 3 can almost replace a full frame camera on a pro gimbal. Great video, and thanks for sharing.

  • @KardosoMedia
    @KardosoMedia 11 місяців тому +12

    The pocket 3 did pretty decent but your stache was the real winner 😉

  • @arnisbrown5848
    @arnisbrown5848 11 місяців тому +12

    Definitely a great bang for buck, even with the very obvious blown out highlights. Pitted against an iPhone 15 Pro on a gimbal in ProRes LOG would be really interesting and probably the main option people are weighing against the Pocket 3. Mount the Pocket horizontally on top of the FX3 while on the gimbal and boom: 4-axis stabilization, a pocket Ronin 4D lol. Still think nothing can beat (at the price point) the flexibility having the 12,800 second base ISO the FX3 gives to be able to stop down.

  • @bobwhitewo3b
    @bobwhitewo3b 11 місяців тому +3

    Ken is on the other side of town from the office when he gets a frantic call from a realtor that needs a house around the corner shot like yesterday. Does Ken drive to the office to get his gear to bail out the realtor? Hell no, he just reaches under the Jeep seat and pulls out his emergency video kit of a Mini 4 Pro and Osmo Pocket 3. One hour later Ken is back shooting pool with his friends.

  • @DonniePhairPhoto
    @DonniePhairPhoto 11 місяців тому +5

    This was the review I was waiting on. The best and most common-sense filled creator and reviewer I know.

  • @CockpitScenes
    @CockpitScenes 11 місяців тому +2

    Someone likes the color white...

  • @nightdonutstudio
    @nightdonutstudio 11 місяців тому +3

    I did some test and find dlog m does not need overexpose as well. Actually -0.3--0.7 yield best result. The log is not very log. More like a natural profile with saturation tune down or cine 4 with sat tune down from Sony camera.

  • @mex5341
    @mex5341 11 місяців тому +2

    Yes , in good hands you can use it for real estate video. Easier and faster workflow

  • @ChrisColeman1962
    @ChrisColeman1962 11 місяців тому +1

    Both are as good , makes me laugh real estate , most American property's ( as the one in this video), is what us British call a shed !

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  11 місяців тому +3

      So glad we celebrate the 4th of July remembering how we beat you

  • @mathiassiebert1217
    @mathiassiebert1217 11 місяців тому +2

    I find there were some shots that look better on the Pocket 3. Sometimes I think, and I don't mean you, that many people "like" the Sony's pictures better because they know that it is the more expensive camera. A blind attempt is sometimes dramatic. I saw a video where a larger camera, the iPhone 15 Pro and the Pocket 3 were compared. I always recognized the iPhone straight away - it was actually the worst. With the other two I was often wrong about which was the more expensive camera as well as the better picture. And often it was the Osmo Pocket 3. Amazing.

  • @willfullyinformed
    @willfullyinformed 10 місяців тому +2

    This is what I wanted to do with the Osmo 2 for my real estate photography business, but after just testing it out on random objects I could tell that was a no-go in comparison to my gimble/A7 setup, but I always maintained hope that future upgrades will allow for it soon as carrying a vastly lighter video setup would make shoots that much more fun and easy going. Just hearing about the Osmo 3 and seeing the image quality difference gave me some hope... did a real estate Osmo search and you came up per usual, exactly what I was hoping for. Hearing the fiddlyness, and wide-angle issues makes me feel like it's a pass though. The Osmo image quality is passable now, comparable to the A7III at this point in its age, which is amazing, but of course, professional gear is also about efficiency on-site + I noticed the windows were definitely more blown out in comparison to FX3's HDR as expected, and I feel the Osmo would still be blown out regardless of knocking down the exposure. Cheers, thanks for always looking into alternatives like this.

  • @marksjourneytothephilippin9574
    @marksjourneytothephilippin9574 8 місяців тому

    You can definitely use it and get good results if you’re a professional, but clients may be upset until they see your finished product. It’s like people who photograph a wedding with a go pro or phone during the day time. Sure you can but you don’t look professional

  • @clydedigital
    @clydedigital 12 днів тому

    The lack of width with the lens makes it unusable, I’d say. In smaller rooms that would be a major issue.. a lot of the shots looked good but were pretty tight. I’m wondering how it would perform in the sort of low light we get here in the winter - badly, I presume.

  • @GaryAbbott
    @GaryAbbott 8 місяців тому

    I watched the video and I’m no film geek but I like the Osmo pocket 3. Colors just looked better on my 4K TV.

  • @oszkarcsabagyorfi7283
    @oszkarcsabagyorfi7283 22 дні тому

    Bought the Pocket 3 a few days ago after watching your video - can't wait to try it out on my next job!! Did you list all the settings you were using for this video? ...might've missed it.

  • @JorgePerezOrozco
    @JorgePerezOrozco 11 місяців тому +2

    Something that is annoying is how yellow cast look in all Sony's lineup the bathroom looked better with the Osmo specially on the chrome hardware. Great Video!

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  11 місяців тому +1

      That’s just white balance eh

  • @parimalsonera8413
    @parimalsonera8413 11 місяців тому

    I am doing Real Estate Photography with the help of Fujifilm XT3. Client want video too can Pocket 3 is Good For beginner like Me ?
    I Never done video before also not have gimbal right now.
    Please Share Your Answer thanks.

  • @alfashion
    @alfashion 10 місяців тому

    Dude, if you didn't know which camera shot what video, you wouldn't know.

  • @vernelfpv
    @vernelfpv 10 місяців тому

    i just notice the diff in focal range but the quality is almost the same when uploaded in YT

  • @PopoRamos
    @PopoRamos 11 місяців тому +1

    I would probably slightly underexpose the pocket and lift and clean the shadows in post. I’m with you on the distortion, that wide angle adapter will never be on my pocket camera. For quick turnaround where maximum quality is not needed, this is good enough. I also use a monopod for some crane moves using my phone as a monitor, it gets the job done fast and easy

  • @AmineAlyoussoufi
    @AmineAlyoussoufi 11 місяців тому +1

    i was waiting for someone to do a pocket 3 real estate video ❤ thank you for this video

  • @chrisregister8021
    @chrisregister8021 10 місяців тому

    Not a replacement yet, but very close. Next generation or 2 and those types of cameras will be Obsolete.....

  • @rohitganguly7646
    @rohitganguly7646 4 місяці тому

    03:06 till 03:08 - that's when you realize that why Pocket 3 cannot replace Fx3

  • @jdmkid01
    @jdmkid01 11 місяців тому +1

    Well you know…. Good things come in….. 3!
    Love the work you do and I’m still super motivated by you and other drone and real estate videographers and photographers to get into this field of work.
    Can’t wait for my time to shine in the industry.
    But for now, thank you to you and everyone else for the motivation and inspiration to get people excited for these things.
    Stay original!!!! Keep the content coming

  • @robwasnj
    @robwasnj 11 місяців тому +1

    Super revealing comparison, thanks for sharing. Dynamic range is one of those things where better gear really shines.

  • @robertsanchez718
    @robertsanchez718 28 днів тому

    Currently using a Sony a6400 and was thinking of getting this Osmo or either Sony 10-18f4 or sigma 10-18 f2.8 any recommendations?

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  28 днів тому

      Neither , if you want to stick APSC look at the ZV E10 2 for 10 bit or go Sony A6700. Having 10 bit is essential for grading purposes

  • @chrisklugh
    @chrisklugh 11 місяців тому +1

    Was going to say there is a clear dynamic range difference, but you did say you overexposed it. So the only other thing I can think of is the lighter P3 will have more jerky movements, so its not going to be the 'professional tool'. But with that said, this gimbal setup is not built for that, and what it does do for what its worth, its quite incredible!
    I have the P1 and love it. The P2 was not an 'upgrade' for me as I had all the accessories for the P1. But the P3 is a worthy considerations now. I however dream of a day when they come out with an m43 with limited lens swapping options. That would be NICE!

    • @benvanmassenhove
      @benvanmassenhove 11 місяців тому

      They will mark my words ;). DJI OSMO PRO 2

  • @dougmorato
    @dougmorato 11 місяців тому +1

    Came for the Pocket 3 but man, the editing is lit!!!
    Question: Do you add post stabilization as well?

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  11 місяців тому +1

      No post stabilization applied, I just try to ninja walk my butt off

    • @dougmorato
      @dougmorato 11 місяців тому

      @@OriginaldoBo nice. It looks really stable!

  • @dyannibarguen
    @dyannibarguen 5 місяців тому

    Thank you for taking your time. I have a cheap Iphone and i was scared of having to upgrade to a 15pro super duper max, now, but looking at your footage, I can tell is more than enough for me. So I'll give it a try. 😅

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  5 місяців тому

      It’s worth a shot, a lot of people preferred the Osmo footage

  • @michaelpoczynek
    @michaelpoczynek 10 місяців тому +1

    Thank you for taking the time to make this video. It was very informative and interesting. Just curious; why do you use a Sony 14mm 1.8 vs. 12-24mm f4? Thanks.

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  10 місяців тому +1

      12 is personally to wide and my mid shots are typically 35-70 mm so I use a different lens

    • @michaelpoczynek
      @michaelpoczynek 10 місяців тому

      @@OriginaldoBoThank you. Great job with the videos. Have a great day!

  • @chipwillis
    @chipwillis 9 днів тому

    This is pretty Dope man, thanks!

  • @MlleVB
    @MlleVB 2 місяці тому

    How do you make the zoom out effect transition?

  • @coardtech
    @coardtech 8 місяців тому

    Geniunely think that Pocket 3 looks and feels smoother. I also got a7iv and sigma 24-70 but i look like a dork carrying it so might get pocket 3 and x100vi to replace my photo/video setup.

  • @petersuvara
    @petersuvara 11 місяців тому +1

    That white blow out on the Pocket 3 really gives it away. But then again, if you're starting out in RealEstate and want to do this but don't have the budget, of course you could go pocket3. But even better, you could go something like ZV-E1 with a DJI RS3 Mini as a mid range option.

    • @macandbern
      @macandbern 11 місяців тому +2

      Could have just exposed for the highlights and pushed it in resolve... That looked like an exposure choice by the shooter that hampered the outcome there. Don't overexpose when uou have a dynamic range limitation, the shadows can be noise reduced. The highlights can't be bought back. Do it again with the wide angle adapter on the three, underexpose by a stop, and post it nicely. I reckon it would be very different outcome.

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  11 місяців тому +3

      The wide angle adapter is complete shit if you are looking for distortion yeah use the fucking wide angle adapter

  • @Voyagephotography
    @Voyagephotography 11 місяців тому +1

    Definitely not beating the FX3 footage.
    Color looked great. Have you done a video grading slog3? Would love to see your process

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  11 місяців тому

      Haven’t done a slog 3 video yet

    • @Voyagephotography
      @Voyagephotography 11 місяців тому

      @@OriginaldoBo you’re welcome for the great idea 💡 lol

  • @BAMDrones-MichaelBelshe
    @BAMDrones-MichaelBelshe 11 місяців тому +1

    Great comparison! To me they both look great! Also I’m digging the mustache! Thanks for sharing!

  • @alfashion
    @alfashion 11 місяців тому

    You couldn't tell the difference if you didn't know which camera was which. In fact the dji out preformed your Sony. You would have never known which was what.

  • @FlyZoneFpv
    @FlyZoneFpv 11 місяців тому

    Holy cow Ken bro that pocket 3 did amazing I’m impressed but it was definitely all you as well. You always do top notch work brother. Oh and I love when you say fuckery 😂😂👊🏻

  • @BlairAir
    @BlairAir 11 місяців тому

    Said to myself "Self!" Ken is NOT going to do a Pocket 3 video. Sure its a terrific small form factor Video tool, but Ken is no Video Tool. Turns out, I got that wrong. You are indeed... doing a video on the Pocket 3. Interesting. I dont see you switching to this, but it could work for some folks.

  • @frankygoestocanada
    @frankygoestocanada 10 місяців тому

    Honestly, like probably most peoples, I hardly can see a difference. The image of the OP3 is so clear... Seeing an add filmed with it would probably convinced me as well as the on filmed with the biger camera rig. As long as the editing is well made, the PO3 does the job hands down. Only a professionnal will see a difference. I believe not 99% of the population.

  • @kaydphoto8717
    @kaydphoto8717 11 місяців тому +1

    How does it handle low light or going back and fourth from dark to light? I do a lot of smaller cottages that can get pretty dark, but i also do video on my phone so i’m sure anything is better than that. Coming from someone who doesn’t have the need to purchase a larger gimbal

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  11 місяців тому +3

      The auto exposure is really smooth and snappy you shouldn’t have a issue

    • @kaydphoto8717
      @kaydphoto8717 11 місяців тому +1

      @@OriginaldoBo awesome thanks for the feedback!

  • @BRDXB
    @BRDXB 7 місяців тому

    how you made 3:28 tran

  • @MVREMD1
    @MVREMD1 11 місяців тому +1

    The most honest review over heard yet, thank you for always keeping it real

  • @trip_the_deep
    @trip_the_deep 7 місяців тому

    did you just say "video-ographers?"

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  7 місяців тому

      “Videographer” don’t be a cynical prick it won’t pan out well here

  • @danielporterAZ
    @danielporterAZ 11 місяців тому

    Noticeable difference but still VERY impressed with the Osmo3.
    Your editing is on point by the way. 🔥

  • @tommydo3020
    @tommydo3020 10 місяців тому

    this is crazy good. How did u ninja so perfect on the pocket 3? lol

  • @BrianKushner
    @BrianKushner 11 місяців тому

    2 mil house..nice.

  • @naskutak
    @naskutak 9 місяців тому

    Can you please do short video how to edit this transition from one room to another.. It kind start slow then go's faster to slowmo into another room.
    If possible in Davinci Resolve

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  9 місяців тому

      That I won’t show because I don’t want it replicated 😎 sorrry

    • @naskutak
      @naskutak 9 місяців тому

      @@OriginaldoBo no problem, but you are not the only one who thouse that on UA-cam. For example realestate video Chanel name is Futuro Avenue they are also one of many which I see doing. I was asking you since I like your videos very much. I have bin following you for ever.
      But thanks for replying ❤️
      Kepp up great work

  • @SpanishDreamEstates
    @SpanishDreamEstates 10 місяців тому

    I’ve been shooting my real estate videos with Samsung galaxy S 20 on a DJI gimbal 6 And surprisingly, it’s quite good with low light indoors And it’s wide-angle has been good enough. This week I had to shoot a couple videos with my Gopro 10 And it’s nowhere near as good as the S20 mobile pn a gimbal. Do you think the new Osmo 3 Would be better for my real estate videos? By the way, I actually present On my videos. What are your thoughts or anyone else’s thoughts about using the Osmo 3?

  • @stefanbernhard2710
    @stefanbernhard2710 7 місяців тому

    I'd like to see a dual lens setup like the air 3 (but with the 1" sensor).

  • @Dragonkill-music
    @Dragonkill-music 10 місяців тому

    is it possible to fix the lens distortion of the wide-angle filter of Osmo pocket 3 ?

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  10 місяців тому +3

      So I actually have a program that can do it and I tried to, but the distortion is so bad that it really never gets it good enough. The only thing I can think of is Dji needs to add a profile called linear so when you attach the lens, you can toggle it to the linear mode and fix it internally with their software.

  • @clydedigital
    @clydedigital 12 днів тому

    Great video btw.

  • @chasenuuhiwa
    @chasenuuhiwa 11 місяців тому +3

    The Osmo looked incredible! I get where you said that it’ll never replace your normal gear but that’s not the point. Like you said, these listings come and go, and it looks like the Osmo can easily shoot the same shots with way less equipment.

    • @digitalbread4574
      @digitalbread4574 11 місяців тому +1

      keep in mind if he had an ND filter he could have cut down some of those blown highlights. with the pocket 3

  • @redtailaerialimaging8983
    @redtailaerialimaging8983 11 місяців тому

    In the words of the Not Way guy.... "Whaaaat, nooo way!".... I was not expecting such good footage from the Osmo. Any videos on how you color grade homes? Nice white walls in this video, hard to do.

  • @SKYLIMI
    @SKYLIMI 11 місяців тому

    Sony FX3 for real estate and then everyone watches it on their phones or tablets at most. I would go for it V-RAPTOR XL, why bother?

  • @WassimJelassi
    @WassimJelassi 11 місяців тому +3

    The osmo footage pulverizes the FX3 or am I hallucinating??? The FX3 seems to have better DR and can recover the highlights better but damn (also less noise)! If that's only the difference!! Just waw! I prefer the Osmo result honestly.
    I was looking for a video like this, thank you for sharing!

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  11 місяців тому +2

      You are absolutely incorrect.

    • @WassimJelassi
      @WassimJelassi 11 місяців тому +1

      @@OriginaldoBo judging by what i see on the screen, a brighter footage is more appealing for me for real estate videos. Especially when the house is white

    • @OriginaldoBo
      @OriginaldoBo  11 місяців тому

      @@WassimJelassithe white and colors aren’t accurate to the house and wood. So no

  • @bsmrodeo
    @bsmrodeo 11 місяців тому

    I thought the osmo looked like cell phone footage. Killer transitions!!!

  • @RoguePainter
    @RoguePainter 10 місяців тому

    The extended battery works really well as well.

  • @henryjons3919
    @henryjons3919 10 місяців тому

    I would love to see how it looks without any editing, right out the box.

  • @zaqgt5
    @zaqgt5 10 місяців тому

    Think I may grab one. I guess 20mm is decent for the OP3. If I can get a good filter to 14-15mm, I’ll be good.