Rose's Turn {Gypsy ~ Broadway, 1990} - Linda Lavin

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 вер 2024
  • Finally, here's Linda Lavin as Rose in Gypsy. I know that she was generally panned by both fans and critics alike when she took over the role from Tyne Daly but honestly, I can't figure out the reason why (other than the fact that like Lansbury, she completely broke the Merman mold and played it differently). She's a great actress and I love her portrayal of this multi-dimensional character. Enjoy!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 58

  • @Gameboyboy17
    @Gameboyboy17 4 місяці тому +4

    This interpretation of Rose is sensational! Manic, desperate, and yearning for something, someone, ANYONE, to tell her she is good enough. It's a brilliant representation of a narcissist at her lowest. BRAVA!

  • @jeffreybruce7679
    @jeffreybruce7679 3 роки тому +19

    And THIS is why Lavin was/is my favorite Rose. I saw all of them, and it was thrilling to recall just "why." I remember thinking that her singing was terrific. Very little vibrato throughout, which was a dangerous yet correct choice. Have you ever heard any Rose who understood EXACTLY what she was singing? Her ability to throw in variations of characterization was so different from all who came before her. Merman was a walking siren. Thrilling, because she was the first. Lansbury acted it better than she sang it (sorry, folks.) LuPone? I thought her take on Rose was too vulgar. Peters? Good, but...really? Tyne Daly? Don't get me started. But Lavin? I never heard an audience throughout, where a pin drop would have been audible. She was a Rose who grabbed you right from the beginning and due to her acting technique, you LIKED her from the get go, you felt her heartbreak, her jealousy and her ambition. I have raved about her on this very site many times. I am thrilled that you (and I) can now see why.

  • @echeleteich3347
    @echeleteich3347 3 роки тому +7

    Very good. Each Rose brings something new to the role. Betty Buckley was phenomenal!!!!

  • @JamesNYCGuy3
    @JamesNYCGuy3 2 роки тому +3

    So overshadowed & underrated! APPLAUSE!

  • @quinnaddison420
    @quinnaddison420 5 місяців тому

    The pause after “there wouldn’t be lights bright enough” is such a small detail but I got chills down my spine

  • @smurf902
    @smurf902 2 роки тому +3

    I love that she's actually hitting real sharp stripper moves here, it adds to the scene. She's embodying what Gypsy was doing like she has been waiting to do this for so long, even though she despised the idea of her daughter being a stripper, although it was done in desperation to make her a star.

  • @WHATTHEBUCKSHOW
    @WHATTHEBUCKSHOW 10 років тому +11

    I believe every second of this!

  • @jaltmedia7740
    @jaltmedia7740 4 роки тому +6

    I never saw her in the role. However, I wonder if it is possible that she was panned early in her run as Rose and took the "notes" graciously and improved. Because I actually like this a lot! She does it differently, and I always like seeing a different and non "merman-esque" rendition.

    • @Muttonchop_USA
      @Muttonchop_USA 4 роки тому +5

      I saw this live. The audience went wild for her! I think some people were nonplussed by the Irish brogue she used (which Rose actually had).

    • @quinnaddison420
      @quinnaddison420 5 місяців тому

      I think that story is actually inspirational! She was a well established actress, but it’s beautiful to hear she took notes and there was a noticeable change.

  • @russellcandy9850
    @russellcandy9850 2 роки тому +1

    Fantastic!! I'd love Miss Lavin in anything!!

  • @shane8808
    @shane8808 9 років тому +14

    I think she's pretty good. People need to get over the idea that only one person can ever play a role.

  • @seansolis6157
    @seansolis6157 5 років тому +4

    She's confused and dazed and I have never seen a performance like it think it gives more to the character as her daughter just basically said buzz off wonderful interputation

  • @nealhenderson3922
    @nealhenderson3922 2 роки тому

    The " King Lear" role for women. Very few can portray this character and sing that song. Ms. Lavin delivers ! Perfection. Feel every ounce of her pain and frustration. There should be Awards for each season. This performance was brilliant and deserved to be recognized.

  • @ActorsWithIssuespodcast
    @ActorsWithIssuespodcast 7 років тому +11

    She puts so much power and emotion into it and spite and neglect, it's wonderful. Also I prefer her staging as opposed to Daly's constant pacing that made her seem manic.

  • @tr3sidential
    @tr3sidential 4 роки тому +2

    Loved it!!!

  • @robertperry814
    @robertperry814 7 років тому +5

    great rendition of this number. she has some moves.

  • @MichaelHammond
    @MichaelHammond 2 роки тому

    Well done, Ms. Lavin!

  • @ky2here
    @ky2here 11 років тому +3

    Maybe because she's shrill and doesn't understand the material. Rose essentially decompensates and hurls into madness. Lavin looks like she's in control and this song is about losing control. There's nothing frightening (besides her tone and foghorn singing). The audience is supposed to be terrified at the end of Rose's turn and Lavin terrified them in the wrong way.

  • @sfogjm
    @sfogjm 9 років тому +5

    Thank you for sharing! I always wondered about Lavin's stint playing Rose on Broadway. As I recall, she had a surprisingly short run but the show had already been running for quite awhile. (And, that's no reflection on Lavin. Remember how quickly SONG AND DANCE closed when Betty Buckley took over.)
    What a fresh interpretation with lots of small gold nuggets throughout. Also, gotta reference how deftly she reinterpreted the "Mama" breakdown moment to be more consistent with the overall performance she gave of the number. The performance strikes me as a distinctly "Lavin" performance--aspects of her public personality are solidly present and don't disappear in the turbulence of that song. I thought that was very interesting.
    As to the criticism that Rose is supposed to be losing control in that number, it's also true that the number is generally supposed to be in her imagination (which is why the extended bows were added subsequent to the original production)., I take Lavin's performance to be how Rose would see herself in one of her many dreams.
    . .

  • @larrydirtybird
    @larrydirtybird 9 років тому +5

    Thanks for posting this! This was the first musical that I ever saw on Broadway, with her in it, so it's great to see a bit of it again. I later saw the show again when Tyne Daly returned to it. Daly effortlessy glided through the role and was funnier, while Lavin seemed to put a lot more into it. I think to a lot of people it looked like she was trying too hard, but I think she gave more complexity to the role. And she was certainly better than Bernadette Peters, whom I saw in the another Broadway revival of the show many years later.

    • @mzmiller52
      @mzmiller52 3 роки тому +1

      I loved Bernadette Peters. Saw Lavin, Buckley, lupone at encores and broadway ( better at encores), and Tyne Daly( loved her as well).
      Buckley was at paper mill, pretty good and started this revolving door of gypsy productions. Still liked peters’ vulnerability and letting others shine, though not the real character. Would like to see someone tell the true story of mama rose. Murder and all.

  • @ChrisRandomSinger
    @ChrisRandomSinger 11 років тому +2

    Thank you, Moonfall! You're a hero! Linda is terrific! So happy to finally be able to see this.

  • @gabrieltaylor2589
    @gabrieltaylor2589 6 місяців тому

    She sounds and acts a lot like Patti which of course she came before. I find the performances very similar. Listen to their Rose's Turns back to back and you'll see what I mean. For me, only Bernadette truly broke the Merman blueprint and made it completely her own (Ben Brantley also said as much in his NY Times review).

  • @MrQbenDanny
    @MrQbenDanny 7 років тому +4

    Brilliant tour de force, she's better than I think she herself thought. I like the Brooklyn Jewish dominating mother she brings to Rose. Fantastic.

  • @cynaraslover
    @cynaraslover 7 років тому +3

    My late partner saw this without me; we had seen Daly together. He had also seen Lansbury in his 20s, and a year earlier, he saw Dolores Gray. He always said each was excellent in her way, Gray being his favourite, but he loved Lavin in it, saying her only flaw was that she played Rose rather coldly. l was impressed with seeing this.

    • @richardmayora6974
      @richardmayora6974 6 років тому

      So many of the comparisons are meaningless if people have not seen Delores Gray. She was magical.

    • @johnpickford4222
      @johnpickford4222 4 роки тому

      Dolores Gray did it in London, didn’t she, following Lansbury? She did the London company of ANNIE GET YOUR GUN when Mary Martin turned it down since she didn’t want to stay in London after starring in Noel Coward’s PACIFIC 1860 which didn’t do well. Gray had a very warm voice, a contralto who could bet and would have been very good. Too bad she didn’t follow Lansbury on Broadway. Elaine Stritch wanted to GYPSY in the London company following her runs in COMPANY but her name wasn’t big enough (and her star bright enough) to get the backing.

  • @aarontakesbroadway
    @aarontakesbroadway 4 роки тому +1

    I don’t actually hate it! I think there are aspects of this performance that are half decent, however, I feel like towards the end she should have been more angry, obviously keep that joy of being on stage but put raw passion into the ending!

  • @misplacedstoic
    @misplacedstoic 9 років тому +3

    This is wonderful.

  • @mousecarroll9758
    @mousecarroll9758 7 років тому +3

    She was the best MamaRose I ever saw, including Merman.

  • @victordunson719
    @victordunson719 3 роки тому

    Yasssssssssssssssss

  • @patnstephen2
    @patnstephen2 10 років тому +1

    this was astonishing. i adore this lady. stephen mosher.

  • @Empoweredwoman1234
    @Empoweredwoman1234 2 роки тому

    She sort of reminds me of Staunton but different. We’ll done.

  • @stevehinnenkamp5625
    @stevehinnenkamp5625 4 роки тому +1

    Valiant performance. She acted the hell out of it. I applaud her.
    It just didn't quite land. I think she tried too hard. Merman didn't try hard enough--that is why performance landed. A great performance always looks easy.

  • @richardjohnson9593
    @richardjohnson9593 6 років тому

    I saw this.... I enjoyed it....

  • @benrimalower
    @benrimalower 10 років тому

    Whoa.

  • @mosshart21
    @mosshart21 11 років тому +2

    It seems she hasn't quite yet found the rhythm yet. This feels like what usually gets seen in rehearsals before an opening. Seeing as how she was a replacement, maybe she just didn't have adequate prep time for this leviathon of a character. Though not polished, I can see the work she's doing as an actress and I'd feel confident she would just get better. As for the voice, i hear power, not foghorn at all. Thanks for posting!

  • @jonthesYT
    @jonthesYT 4 роки тому +3

    The accent misguided.

    • @Muttonchop_USA
      @Muttonchop_USA 3 роки тому +1

      Except for the fact that that's how the real woman sounded.

  • @sammy7819
    @sammy7819 10 років тому +3

    I've always thought Linda Lavin was a very good broadway actress

  • @johnflynn9619
    @johnflynn9619 2 роки тому +1

    Linda is a Great Actress.
    But, her vocals were not up to the material.

  • @sharoncarrier18
    @sharoncarrier18 5 років тому +4

    I'm not impressed. Annoying voice.

  • @markcarpenter9235
    @markcarpenter9235 22 дні тому

    I would have been very disappointed if I had paid money to see this. I think she's dreadful Her reading of the opening monologue is one of the worst pieces of acting I have ever witnessed. Her cadence makes no sense to me.

  • @taikob0y
    @taikob0y 6 років тому +1

    OMG her screechy nasal voice is awful. I love Lavin but not in this role. But thanks for posting, I was always curious how she performed Rose

  • @liesljones5987
    @liesljones5987 8 років тому +7

    Anyone who believes Lavin isn't delivering a first-class version of this tour-de-force number has only seen GYPSY performed by a 7-year-old in a grammar
    school sandbox. And as far as that "acclaimed" Brit lady goes - back to Gilbert &
    Sullivan!

    • @stedmantx
      @stedmantx 8 років тому +2

      +LieslJones59, I hope you mean Staunton and not Lansbury.

    • @readerjoy
      @readerjoy 7 років тому +2

      Or maybe we don't like horrible singing.

  • @jamesbyrne2223
    @jamesbyrne2223 8 років тому +6

    painful. worse than watching reruns of "Alice."

  • @karenmckenny2587
    @karenmckenny2587 5 років тому +2

    She didn’t let go quite enough. Too controlled when the character was supposed to be having a breakdown. Patti Lupone played Rose the best.

    • @johnpickford4222
      @johnpickford4222 4 роки тому

      Well, for the breakdown she could channel getting displaced UNFAIRLY from the Broadway opening of SUNSET BOULEVARD. She should have ALW and asked, “I’m ready for the opening now.”

  • @drewy412
    @drewy412 10 років тому +3

    Yikes!

  • @glp329
    @glp329 4 роки тому +1

    Merman, Russell, Daly the rest forget it.

    • @johnpickford4222
      @johnpickford4222 4 роки тому

      And not ANGELA LANSBURY? ‘You don’t know talent, not what I call talent, Mr. George Paterson’

    • @glp329
      @glp329 4 роки тому

      @@johnpickford4222 I Love Angela Lansbury .Can't name everyone.

  • @capt.molyneaux7037
    @capt.molyneaux7037 5 років тому

    Dear god.....this reeks of poo !