@CNGRYDER There is no Ummah, Afghanistan is a historically ancient nation, while Pakistan was created based on nationalism deceiving people, that it was based on Islam 😆 🤣 Pakistan was created by British to serve British interest in south Asia and to counter India as a rival. This is not a nation that fought the British on practical wars to form a state, it was giving in alms by British themselves.
Afghans🇦🇫fought three Anglo Afghan wars, for their sovereignty, with Pakistan creation as Afghan neighbour meant never ending Anglo Afghan wars for eternity 😢
Those wars were imposed on Afghanistan by the British. They were not liberation wars waged by the Afghans. They resulted in Afghanistan ceding present day Pakistan to the British and agreeing to the Durrand line. However after the Muslims of Pakistan liberated their land from the British, Afghan ethno nationalists suddenly became interested in starting a war over the border which they never dared to do against the British. Of course the Muslims of the land are never going to allow this to happen so it really is a ridiculous situation. Interestingly, Afghan nationalists are not interested in removing the durand line, instead they want to replace it with a new one that has never existed, it will be a border that will will create an artificial Pashtun majority in Afghanistan so Pashtuns can lord it over all other Afghans. If these Afghan nationalists had any sincerity they would be pushing for the removal of the durrand line not a new replacement. This would merge Pakistan back into Afghanistan bringing back the return of the original Durranistan that existed before the British.
@AliSidTex Corrections: Muslim Pakistanis didn't liberate. They were awarded territory by British for the British interest, like giving alms to the beggar, beggars can be chosers. Afghan nationalist only showed interest because they never made agreement with new state of Pakistan, the agreement was made with British India, so it nullifies the agreement, hence why nationalist Afghan appeared. They want to eliminate Durrand line, this is why they lar au bar yaw Afghan, upper and lower one Afghan, this is not rule over other ethnics, if it was the case why Pashtuns adopted Dari in their empire, Pashtuns are inclusive minded, unlike other ethnics, who only work for Persianisation. This is the reason non Pashtuns were never able to rule or win major elections. The reason Afghans started war with Pakistan, because they knew it was based on nationalism and not Islamic community, otherwise why didn't they new Muslims extended and joined an state bigger Afghanistan than to form new state.
Corrections: Muslim Pakistanis didn't liberate. They were awarded territory by British for the British interest, like giving alms to the beggar, beggars can be chosers. Afghan nationalist only showed interest because they never made agreement with new state of Pakistan, the agreement was made with British India, so it nullifies the agreement, hence why nationalist Afghan appeared. They want to eliminate Durrand line, this is why they lar au bar yaw Afghan, upper and lower one Afghan, this is not rule over other ethnics, if it was the case why Pashtuns adopted Dari in their empire, Pashtuns are inclusive minded, unlike other ethnics, who only work for Persianisation. This is the reason non Pashtuns were never able to rule or win major elections. The reason Afghans started war with Pakistan, because they knew it was based on nationalism and not Islamic community, otherwise why didn't they new Muslims extended and joined an state bigger Afghanistan than to form new state.
@@Mu5tyLaghmani that's nationalist nonsense. In reality, the Muslims living under the British Indian Empire waged several armed uprisings against the British till the British were finally forced to leave after 80 years of British rule over Pakistan. The British left behind a Hindu Brahmin regime headed by Nehru who was part of a political party setup by the British called Congress. The Muslims who had fought the British were demanding independence from this Hindu regime. India could not control areas where Muslims dominated without falling into a massive civil war. So Nehru petitioned the British in carving up various states like Punjab, Bengal and Sindh to sieze territory. He then setup progroms to force Muslims to flee the areas India was siezing. Millions of Muslims were ethnically cleansed in this genocide. The surviving Muslims created Pakistan out of the areas that India could not control. However Britain continued to support India's invasions and annexations of Kashmir, Hyderabad Deccan, Adaman Islands etc.
@@AliSidTex ok my friend did you grandfather and father walk from India . The Durand line was never official. You were a product of the British Pakistan never existed before 1947. In 1850 your four fathers were in India not the land of Afghanistan.
Dr Akmal analysis is totally misleading and played with words. Describe Akmal words Local people angry, disfranchised, distrust. Akmal you are mixing PTM and TTP. Sheikh Muhammad shirazi you are listening to wrong person. If you need true and real time information I am ready to discuss. It will be based on ground facts. Can you ask Akmal about DIKhan, bannu, lakimarwat, and bajour police protest against ISI
Jazakallah khair ❤
Brilliant video, very well explained analysis of the situation of the ummah in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
@CNGRYDER
There is no Ummah, Afghanistan is a historically ancient nation, while Pakistan was created based on nationalism deceiving people, that it was based on Islam 😆 🤣 Pakistan was created by British to serve British interest in south Asia and to counter India as a rival. This is not a nation that fought the British on practical wars to form a state, it was giving in alms by British themselves.
Afghans🇦🇫fought three Anglo Afghan wars, for their sovereignty, with Pakistan creation as Afghan neighbour meant never ending Anglo Afghan wars for eternity 😢
Those wars were imposed on Afghanistan by the British. They were not liberation wars waged by the Afghans. They resulted in Afghanistan ceding present day Pakistan to the British and agreeing to the Durrand line. However after the Muslims of Pakistan liberated their land from the British, Afghan ethno nationalists suddenly became interested in starting a war over the border which they never dared to do against the British. Of course the Muslims of the land are never going to allow this to happen so it really is a ridiculous situation. Interestingly, Afghan nationalists are not interested in removing the durand line, instead they want to replace it with a new one that has never existed, it will be a border that will will create an artificial Pashtun majority in Afghanistan so Pashtuns can lord it over all other Afghans. If these Afghan nationalists had any sincerity they would be pushing for the removal of the durrand line not a new replacement. This would merge Pakistan back into Afghanistan bringing back the return of the original Durranistan that existed before the British.
@AliSidTex
Corrections: Muslim Pakistanis didn't liberate. They were awarded territory by British for the British interest, like giving alms to the beggar, beggars can be chosers.
Afghan nationalist only showed interest because they never made agreement with new state of Pakistan, the agreement was made with British India, so it nullifies the agreement, hence why nationalist Afghan appeared.
They want to eliminate Durrand line, this is why they lar au bar yaw Afghan, upper and lower one Afghan, this is not rule over other ethnics, if it was the case why Pashtuns adopted Dari in their empire, Pashtuns are inclusive minded, unlike other ethnics, who only work for Persianisation. This is the reason non Pashtuns were never able to rule or win major elections. The reason Afghans started war with Pakistan, because they knew it was based on nationalism and not Islamic community, otherwise why didn't they new Muslims extended and joined an state bigger Afghanistan than to form new state.
Corrections: Muslim Pakistanis didn't liberate. They were awarded territory by British for the British interest, like giving alms to the beggar, beggars can be chosers.
Afghan nationalist only showed interest because they never made agreement with new state of Pakistan, the agreement was made with British India, so it nullifies the agreement, hence why nationalist Afghan appeared.
They want to eliminate Durrand line, this is why they lar au bar yaw Afghan, upper and lower one Afghan, this is not rule over other ethnics, if it was the case why Pashtuns adopted Dari in their empire, Pashtuns are inclusive minded, unlike other ethnics, who only work for Persianisation. This is the reason non Pashtuns were never able to rule or win major elections. The reason Afghans started war with Pakistan, because they knew it was based on nationalism and not Islamic community, otherwise why didn't they new Muslims extended and joined an state bigger Afghanistan than to form new state.
@@Mu5tyLaghmani that's nationalist nonsense. In reality, the Muslims living under the British Indian Empire waged several armed uprisings against the British till the British were finally forced to leave after 80 years of British rule over Pakistan. The British left behind a Hindu Brahmin regime headed by Nehru who was part of a political party setup by the British called Congress. The Muslims who had fought the British were demanding independence from this Hindu regime. India could not control areas where Muslims dominated without falling into a massive civil war. So Nehru petitioned the British in carving up various states like Punjab, Bengal and Sindh to sieze territory. He then setup progroms to force Muslims to flee the areas India was siezing. Millions of Muslims were ethnically cleansed in this genocide. The surviving Muslims created Pakistan out of the areas that India could not control. However Britain continued to support India's invasions and annexations of Kashmir, Hyderabad Deccan, Adaman Islands etc.
@@AliSidTex ok my friend did you grandfather and father walk from India . The Durand line was never official.
You were a product of the British Pakistan never existed before 1947.
In 1850 your four fathers were in India not the land of Afghanistan.
Stop blaming other.
Dr Akmal analysis is totally misleading and played with words.
Describe Akmal words
Local people angry, disfranchised, distrust.
Akmal you are mixing PTM and TTP.
Sheikh Muhammad shirazi you are listening to wrong person.
If you need true and real time information I am ready to discuss.
It will be based on ground facts.
Can you ask Akmal about DIKhan, bannu, lakimarwat, and bajour police protest against ISI
Pls let us know how to get in touch with you insha’Allah.