I knew I recognised her from the Functional Programming talk I saw years ago! It's one of the first talks I ever saw and it drove me to learn more JS! Go Anjana!
Finally we have a great explanation to generators. I knew about these for quite some time but since they are not much used, had limited knowledge on how to make them work with complex things, especially async ones. Great session.
I've read about the iterators and iterables from MDN and since then I was like, now I know what can be iterated on JS and how. And when I read about generators I was like, yeah they are there, but how to effectively use them. Thank you Anjana for showing us the various ways.
This is a great talk! However I always think back to the JS platform docs at my second job (at a very large company).... " Generators: Don't use generators." And it still makes sense because no matter what you do you'll always end up with code that's "too clever".
It was so exciting it ended in a blink of an eye. Thanks Anjana, generators have big potential. I’m gonna experiment with them, doing state manager and renderer.
As always, her presentation is amazing!. One small observation: Actually the cardDeck, can be expressed in a purely functional way, as the generators returned by generator function are iterable as well as iterator: const cardDeck = function* () { const suits = ["♣", "♦", "♥", "♠"]; const court = ["J", "Q", "K", "A"]; for (let suit of suits) { for (let i = 2; i
You've been using them without even knowing it. Async/Await are basically syntactic sugar for generators. Before them, to achieve a similar functionality, you had to use generators.
Cool... I've seen some really stupid negative comments on some of her other talks but the Anjana fan club is out in force on this one... as it should be.
Great presentation and great energy! Regarding generators - it might be just me but it still feels to me like generators are a cool yet much less readable way to do stuff. Yield makes code run in a non-linear and less intuitive fashion. I wonder if it is just me...
@@Ty-13 Not currently, and there are a lot of reasons for that. One there are a lot of better frameworks out there more suited for speed that people should consider like solidjs. My framework is different. It doesn't have custom components, just pre-built components that all fit together in a grid system. The cool thing is getting data from the user happens synchronously. So you don't need to have call back functions for forms. When it's on the screen the program yields and waits for the form to be submitted before continuing execution
Really cool technology, great to finally have it in JS. We already have that in C# for years, its nothing new. I wonder when will source generators come for JS.
Still need to be explain, what is the easiest way of implementing data science and Machine learning with js, and to more often a offline ide for such purpose.
Good code is clear, not tricky. Implementing a bidirectional channel using a proper object would be so much more readable (and customizable) than using generators’ .next tricks
not sure if python stole from js or the other way around, but they seem to look and function identically. very fun to use, but easy to create unreasonable code imo.
So one of the most important things generator does is that you cannot store an infinite amount of data on your memory like calculating factorials, or stream of data through api it look something like pagination only bring that part of data, when it actually needed.
I have a theory, that she herself is an asynchronous iterable generator, that consumes a lot of data, and some water, and then yields it for all of us, mere mortal, to try and get.
The problem with those who lack computer education is exactly this. The order is actually like this: Stackless coroutines, event loops, self-suspending functions, iterators, simpler syntax generators, coroutines with simpler syntax, async functions, tasks, promises or futures. But wait, my dear friends. Promises in JavaScript have nothing to do with promises in reality. They are actually a function that puts itself in a queue! JavaScript's foolish features insult the spirit of programming and computer science.
I don't feel like this talk was particularly useful, as most of the examples could be done easily without generators. Especially the ping-pong was plain stupid as it weren't the generators that enabled to circumvent maximum call stack size, it was the queue + run function.... I really hoped to learn something good here... Anyway, to me, the only thing that makes generators worth it, is logic and I/O separation. It is something I needed to be able to write testable code that is heavily dependent on external factors like read/write, running external programs or communicating with them, etc... It is something I could not find any different reasonable solution for. There is nothing else I came to contact with for what I couldn't find simpler solution than generators.
she is back
Folks been waiting for her like a star wars trilogy
Exactly my thought every time i see her in a video
@@bradyfractal6653 She is just excited and happy to be presenting.
I knew I recognised her from the Functional Programming talk I saw years ago! It's one of the first talks I ever saw and it drove me to learn more JS! Go Anjana!
same thing here bro she is amazing 🔥🔥
Same here
Yay! One more Anjana talk on the internet.
THAT TALK WAS SO GOOD RIGHT?!
She has given several awesome talks, and you can find multiple of them here in youtube! Search for her name, the subjects she covers are varied.
I love her energy. Great presentation too! I've always struggled understanding generators.
Bro got that Einstein e=mc2 rizz 👀
I can't believe that this video helped me understand generators better than anything I ever saw or read on generators.
just fascinated how can something that's so under talked and underrated small little thing can be this powerful and cool.
Anjana is very energetic which makes the presentation interesting!
I've never seen any speaker in a tech conference that talk so enthusiastic like her
Finally we have a great explanation to generators. I knew about these for quite some time but since they are not much used, had limited knowledge on how to make them work with complex things, especially async ones. Great session.
Very good intro. And yes you're totally right, generators are underused. Very much appreciate your talk!
Love her energy, what a beautiful soul. Thanks for this wonderful presentation!
Brilliant talk. Please keep the code being talked about on the screen!
Yup! Here's the code/slides observablehq.com/@anjana/the-power-of-js-generators
I've read about the iterators and iterables from MDN and since then I was like, now I know what can be iterated on JS and how. And when I read about generators I was like, yeah they are there, but how to effectively use them. Thank you Anjana for showing us the various ways.
I studied generators few years ago but this explanation is so fun man
start at 9:18
Her energy is unmatched
Another excellent talk. I'd recommend a talk she has about functional programming. She is a super good communicator!
Such a nice talk, it's a shame that the person that editted it made a lot of cuts when code was presented and instead showed audience from the back...
idk what are u talking about
@@N32-e1g approx. 20:15 - 22:30 she explains her code step by step, but we don't see it because it's zoomed out.
@@4ipon4ik anyway u can't learn js by watching conferences
@@N32-e1g idk what are u talking about
Wow she's exceptional.Great job on this presentation!
Anjana's talks are always bangers.
she is crazy)) and Is it contagious) It spreads) I even see how I shout "Generators!" in the middle of night while I am sleeping
I have no idea what she’s talking about but it looks cool
This could be among my favorite conference talks
Watched from the beginning to the end. Good stuff!
Finally the legendary is showing up
Excellent presentation of GENERATORS! (who saw the introduction will understand)
Great energy of Anjana Vakil! Thanks!
Thank you for speaking in this video. I have never heard of generators but now I am curious. Thank you.
Big fan of Anjana. Good to see her again.
i love her energy😃
We want more conf with her !
This is a great talk! However I always think back to the JS platform docs at my second job (at a very large company).... " Generators: Don't use generators."
And it still makes sense because no matter what you do you'll always end up with code that's "too clever".
thanks!
😂🤣😅
"too clever" a.k.a. requires prerequisite knowledge of how they work, which most devs lack because they're too scared to use them
Bruh how is this too clever? It literally is explained in a 30 minute talk
+1
It was so exciting it ended in a blink of an eye. Thanks Anjana, generators have big potential. I’m gonna experiment with them, doing state manager and renderer.
Great to see Anjana again, wow.
Thanks Anjali for showering us with your...
Taking from infinite sequences absolutely blew my mind! Thanks for sharing 😊
As always, her presentation is amazing!. One small observation: Actually the cardDeck, can be expressed in a purely functional way, as the generators returned by generator function are iterable as well as iterator:
const cardDeck = function* () {
const suits = ["♣", "♦", "♥", "♠"];
const court = ["J", "Q", "K", "A"];
for (let suit of suits) {
for (let i = 2; i
awesome Anjana Vakil, thanks for this masterclass
Definitely she is amazing 😊
She becomes more energetic every time she takes a sip of this "water".
love her power
At 2:38 she says "duck-duck-go'ing them..." #BOSS
She is amazing, fun, smart, and beautiful
I really appreciate your performance. Now I know more about generators and wanna apply them.😎
Her energy and enthusiasm is mind-blowing.
Wow, this is such a great video. Thanks so much!
One of the best speakers.
Anjana knows the best way to engage all your senses
She made generators quite simple to understand !
No doubt its very useful but
Why would you switch camera while she is explaining the code 20:15. :(
yeah, producer was sleeping or editor mistake, or what?
Happy to see you again 💜💜
You've been using them without even knowing it. Async/Await are basically syntactic sugar for generators. Before them, to achieve a similar functionality, you had to use generators.
Cool... I've seen some really stupid negative comments on some of her other talks but the Anjana fan club is out in force on this one... as it should be.
Knew Anjana from her talk on Functional Programming. On her way to be the public voice of JavaScript.
She is back again
Great talk, thanks a lot!
You're like an Marvel Superhero, but to JS. Trully saved me a day (again).
Wow this is very cool!
Great talk! Love how generators can be used for various usecases. Also lowkey, I'm getting Zendaya vibes.
What is Zendaya? Now I'm curious
She is fire 🔥
Awesome I finally understand ;)
legend is back
Good to see you.
HOT NEW FEATURE FROM 6 YEARS AGO 🤣 BTW loved it.
Amazing stuff! One of the best talks ever! 🙌
Great presentation and great energy! Regarding generators - it might be just me but it still feels to me like generators are a cool yet much less readable way to do stuff. Yield makes code run in a non-linear and less intuitive fashion. I wonder if it is just me...
Great presentation! Thanks!
I looked for this for ages
I thought I understood generators. This blew my mind.
Generators are so underutilized. I created a javascript framework with them that let's me build web apps in 1/10th of the time it took me before.
Is it open source?
@@Ty-13 Not currently, and there are a lot of reasons for that. One there are a lot of better frameworks out there more suited for speed that people should consider like solidjs. My framework is different.
It doesn't have custom components, just pre-built components that all fit together in a grid system. The cool thing is getting data from the user happens synchronously. So you don't need to have call back functions for forms. When it's on the screen the program yields and waits for the form to be submitted before continuing execution
Quality content, but I needed to slow down the video speed a little :D
Really cool technology, great to finally have it in JS. We already have that in C# for years, its nothing new.
I wonder when will source generators come for JS.
great talk btw you guys could have at least linked up the resources from the end of the video to your descriptiopn
AWESOME
Still need to be explain, what is the easiest way of implementing data science and Machine learning with js, and to more often a offline ide for such purpose.
I didn't realize generators were so powerful
nice explanation
wovvv ,,,,,, really amazing....!
Good code is clear, not tricky.
Implementing a bidirectional channel using a proper object would be so much more readable (and customizable) than using generators’ .next tricks
Welcome back Anjana
What is the tool/website called where Anjana makes her code blocks with?
awesome
not sure if python stole from js or the other way around, but they seem to look and function identically. very fun to use, but easy to create unreasonable code imo.
How does event loop handles it?
is there a way to download the slides, presented in the video?
Would it be possible to get those code snippets from somewhere? Yes, I can copy from the screen but maybe I can save some typing if it is.
observablehq.com/@anjana/the-power-of-js-generators
observablehq.com/@anjana/the-power-of-js-generators
the link was on the screen in the beginning observablehq.com/@anjana/the-power-of-js-generators
The slideshow is linked at the beginning of the talk.
Get a mac
So one of the most important things generator does is that you cannot store an infinite amount of data on your memory like calculating factorials, or stream of data through api it look something like pagination only bring that part of data, when it actually needed.
What is music intro?
og is back ❤️
Anyone make the Starwars example work? I cant. How it is working? How i can console.log the object starwars with all the data?
Thanks
Like your energy
Why isn't js pressed about using generators for iteration like c# is? Isn't enumeration of entire arrays really bad in general?
Makes you wonder why they can't get Tail Recursion into JavaScript compilers, if they can do this stuff :/
I have a theory, that she herself is an asynchronous iterable generator, that consumes a lot of data, and some water, and then yields it for all of us, mere mortal, to try and get.
generators are sick
The problem with those who lack computer education is exactly this.
The order is actually like this:
Stackless coroutines, event loops, self-suspending functions, iterators, simpler syntax generators, coroutines with simpler syntax, async functions, tasks, promises or futures.
But wait, my dear friends.
Promises in JavaScript have nothing to do with promises in reality. They are actually a function that puts itself in a queue!
JavaScript's foolish features insult the spirit of programming and computer science.
this is straight up sorcery
21:30 I want to see the code...
Looks similar to php's generator, but basically this is mostly borrowed concept of disappearing pointers.
i'm not sure why do we need to use them
I don't feel like this talk was particularly useful, as most of the examples could be done easily without generators. Especially the ping-pong was plain stupid as it weren't the generators that enabled to circumvent maximum call stack size, it was the queue + run function.... I really hoped to learn something good here...
Anyway, to me, the only thing that makes generators worth it, is logic and I/O separation. It is something I needed to be able to write testable code that is heavily dependent on external factors like read/write, running external programs or communicating with them, etc... It is something I could not find any different reasonable solution for. There is nothing else I came to contact with for what I couldn't find simpler solution than generators.
If you shows on the screen that's how it will execute then it will much better