NECO 2024 Physics Practical Mechanics (Question 1)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 сер 2024
- This is a complete step by step guide to help teachers and students achieve the required result in NECO Physics practical 2024. The required physics specimen for NECO 2024 have been used to predict likely questions in this video.
Please subscribe to this channel and turn the bell notifications for more videos on electricity and optics for NECO Physics Practical 2024.
#necophysicspractical2024
#physicsspecimenforneco2024
#necopracticals2024 #necospecimen2024 #necophysicspastquestions #necophysicspractical2024 #alternativemechanics #velocityratio #mechanicaladvantage #fixedsinglepulley #pulleysandsimplemachines
You are really doing well
Thanks so much
You have said it all 👍🤝👫
Thanks so much
Nice Job ma, God bless you ma
Thanks so much, bless you too
Awesome
Thanks so much
I applaud your ideology,you are indeed a good physics teacher and I love your teachings 😊.
Thanks so much
Well done
Thanks so much
As always you are never below expectation .In short you are really good at it
Thanks so much
More so, the best fit points should be balanced in such a way that the points be on both sides. Every concepts still fall in place. you are doing well
Thanks so much, thanks for your contribution
Awesome job 🎉
Thanks so much
You are the best.
Every other tutors were using two pulleys only u used 1 which was what we were asked to provide .
But ur measurement of d1 and d2 suppose to be from equilibrium line
Displacement should be from starting point pls check it out
Thanks so much for your contribution as well.
Nice one ma'am 😊❤..May the Lord renew ur knowledge 🙏
Amen
Thanks so much
you are good at what you do
Thanks so much
You are right about threads, it kept on pulling the whole thing down.I think the distances should have been measured from the equilibrium position.
Yes, thanks for your contribution
Yes. You're right
Thank you so much.
📚🌍👁️📚👍🙋♂️
Thanks so much ma,i love this teaching, sorry to say,i love you ma,and may my God protect you
Amen, thanks so much
Weldone Ma for the good job done Ma, Ma the distance of d1 and d2 for each masses should be measures from the equilibrium position
Thanks so much
Exactly. The displacement should be from the equilibrium point
Please,
can you explain? I'm confused.
Thank you so much ma
May God bless your efforts IJNA❤❤❤
Amen, thanks so much.
I really applaud you because every theory or concept quoted was accurate. As a physics teacher, you are very correct. Thanks because i learnt new things from your method.
Thanks so much
You have done well
I did not believe my self. I watched till the end
Thanks so much
Beautiful
Can you suggest years that have similar questions on this 🙏?
Thanks so much.
Is not common. The only one in the past question is with two fixed pulleys that's NECO 2011.
Ma nice one ma I enjoy the teaching but how do u measure d1 that of 20g or 30g.or no 30
You did very well ma, thank u so much
You are most welcome
Well done ma, God bless you
Thanks so much, bless you too
This is nice 👍 maam.
Thanks so much
Thanks so much
Weldone dear...😊
Thanks a lot 😊
good job well done ma
Thank you so much
Ma this video is nice 👍. ..... I appreciate 🙏
Thanks so much
Thanks so much ma, God bless you
You are most welcome
You are most welcome
Well done. But I like to suggest above possibility. Can you approach it from the angle of resultant and equilibrium of forces. rather than machine. Since only one fixed pully is required, I suggest that one end of the string would be fixed while the 30g mass is attached to the other end. Any of the other weights is then positioned in turn between the fixed end and the 30g weight, and the equilibrium position is the found, and angles measured. Then the use of triangle of forces or the parallelogram law of dordes may the be employed. Let' us see if this will also work. Thanks for giving me audience.
Thanks for your contribution and suggestions. I will try it out on Monday and see if it will work. If I get a good result, I will do another video. Is another research for me and I pray God will help me get a good result.
Thank you so so much. I went to school today, did force board experiment, here is the result.
ua-cam.com/video/3LjYjFz6Ysk/v-deo.htmlsi=x9NjtdzZG3NEvcYX
Well Done ma .
A teacher can never tell the bounds of his/her influence..
I'm currently at Nsukka. The seat of UNN.
We appreciate you excellent endeavors.
Thanks so much
Awesome 👍
Please what kind of twine did you use in the experiment?....all the other twine that I've using is not in equilibrium state
Thanks
Wish l can share the picture with you. Is not the type for hanging clothes.
@@JoynuelPhysics can you share the name or where I can get it
Precautions should also be stated
Yes, thanks so much
For d2 for the 40g mass is it not supposed to start from the equilibrium point ma....thanks for this more grace. Thats y u were having same value with that of 20g
Amen. Thanks so much for your contribution.
Nice video ma
Pls ma from which year did they repeat the question
Thanks so much
It's not common in past questions.
The one in past questions is for two pulleys NECO 2011
Thank you so much ma.
Please I'm banking on you about the other expected (contemplated) remaining 2024 NECO remaining questions on practical physics.
Thank you in advance..
Sure, will upload others soon, thanks for dropping your comment, I really appreciate it when people react to my videos.
@@JoynuelPhysics thank you so much.
I'm a teacher and have students under me ...
Ma please
What's the first question
The mass hanger also has its mass. Did you not put that into consideration. If you add the 30g mass, it will not be 30g again. Could please, explain. Thank you.
That was why l used 20g mass hangers on both sides at the beginning. So the system will be in equilibrium.
As far as the mass hangers at both sides are of same mass, you are to neglect their masses
Thanks for your contribution
The question 2 of the neco practical is it the same thing as the question 2 of the waec practical ma?
Yes, is the same optics
I will recommend you watch the optics video l did for waec 2025. Thanks
Okay
You are using same rectangular prism but there are up to five ways the diagram can be drawn
Yes, thanks so much for your contribution
The line of best fit is wrong. If you are to pick three out of five,then the remaining two should fall on the opposite sides of the line of best fit.
Well done.
Thanks so much, l appreciate your contribution and correction
Thank u ma
U re welcome
Thank u ma
Ur explanation is topnotch🎉
Buh where can i get twine pls??
Thanks so much
Check people that sell building materials.
Ok ma
Pls when will u do the electricity pratical😢
After the sallah holidays
From yiur graph,it think you can still have more accurate line of best fit.
Yes, the values were very close, thanks so much
I want to join the group u post questions and answers before exam
Are we going to submit the plain paper along with our script that day?
Yes
Good evening ma, my name is Anderson, and I am also a science tutor, nice job you are doing there, but I feel you should calculate your both displacement from the point of equilibrium which at the small hole on your pulley to the twine ends of both hangers i.e where the twine was tied
Thanks for your contribution, noted
Pls how many questions are to be answered in neco physics practical
Two questions out of three
Will the drawing paper also be submitted along with the answer script
Yes, l think so because of Optics experience.
Please ma is it a must it passes through the origin
Yes
ATWOOD MACHINE is the name of the setup. Well done and kudos to you sister.
Try and plot another graph with the CUMULATIVE ADDITION of the displacements.
Thanks so much ❤️
Most the line pass through the origin
No, just pick the best line of fit. Some errors may occur, it must not be perfect
What of if you have 0.88
Good effort, watch this video
ua-cam.com/video/3LjYjFz6Ysk/v-deo.htmlsi=x9NjtdzZG3NEvcYX
Thanks ma. Please which year can we see this practical ma
Thanks dear, l didn't get it from past question. Predicted it from theoretical knowledge and calculation.
@@JoynuelPhysics ok ma. I wanted to confirm because other videos I saw on UA-cam are using two single fixed pulleys, and the practical demanded one fixed so, something is out of line.
Yes, the requirement is one fixed pulley.
Good job, ma'am..
Do you have a WhatsApp group? I will like to be there for more knowledge
Thanks so much, send a WhatsApp message to 08032933241
Please how do I reach you privately.
U can call or Whatsapp 08032933241, have a blessed day
Are we summit the white paper
Yes, just like in optics
You are good at what you do.
Your prediction for WAEC was superb. I watched you before the exam and everything went well.
Please for this year NECO, what year is this question coming from?
Thanks and keeping doing this..
Thanks such much
I didn't see any similar requirement from past question. I just predicted after thorough research from theory.
What topic is this coming from.? So I can read more about the theory.
Thanks for responding
Machines @@solomonadejoh5076
Machines
Something similar was asked in neco 2020 . In fact the instructions are almost the same. The slight difference there is that in the one of 2020, two pulleys were used while in this one, only one pulley is required.
Please ma do you teach che6
Yes dear
Thats why your measurements are too close
Thanks so much for the correction
You are right about threads, it kept on pulling the whole thing down.I think the distances should have been measured from the equilibrium positions.
Yes