Please upload more such lectures.I definitely know there are a very few people viewing these kind of lect.But these few people, including me,need this.🙏
Swami Pranams. Thank you very much once again for this pravochanam. It was not the easiest suktam to understand and you have made it so easy and sweet to grasp.I will now go through your earlier discourses.
The first two hymns "Nardya Suktam" takes one to different dimension of wonderment!! To me it appears as if it indicates that creation happened through nothingness since it reads नासदासीन्नो सदासीत्तदानीं नासीद्रजो नो व्योमा परो यत् |किमावरीवः कुह कस्य शर्मन्नम्भः किमासीद्गहनं गभीरम् ॥ १॥न मृत्युरासीदमृतं न तर्हि न रात्र्या अह्न आसीत्प्रकेतः |आनीदवातं स्वधया तदेकं तस्माद्धान्यन्न परः किञ्चनास ॥२॥ Meaning "There was neither death nor immortality then. There was no distinguishing sign of night nor of day. That One breathed, windless, by its own impulse. Other than that there was nothing beyond." The third hymn tends to define this "Nothingness" as dark within the dark and within this emptiness lies life-force energy. I am not sure what the reference of water and power of heat means in this hymn.( Probably it indicates fluid state of creation and heat indicates Sun?)तम आसीत्तमसा गूहळमग्रे प्रकेतं सलिलं सर्वाऽइदम् |तुच्छ्येनाभ्वपिहितं यदासीत्तपसस्तन्महिनाजायतैकम् ॥३॥ Fourth hymn is also very interesting which indicates first desire to create came in cosmic mind. This cosmic mind can be known through wisdom by sages and learned. कामस्तदग्रे समवर्तताधि मनसो रेतः प्रथमं यदासीत् |सतो बन्धुमसति निरविन्दन्हृदि प्रतीष्या कवयो मनीषा ॥४॥
Swamiji … if one cannot fathom the origin of it all, then isn’t all else speculation? Btw I’m very impressed with your frankness about a lot of profound questions I have grown up in the Advaita tradition but Nasadiya Suktha has made me question it all. If we don’t know for sure the origins of everything, all else seems like what we WANT to believe based on second hand knowledge from our scriptures but we can never know by direct experience or understanding. I request you to please opine on this
Dwa suparna sayuja sakhaya samanam brikhsham pari shasyajate tayo anno pipallam swadu atti anashan annya abhi chakshiti. Rig veda mandal 1 sukta 126 mantra 20. Is this hym contradicts nasdiya sukta? Here Nature, Jibatma and Parmatma all three are anadi and nitya. Jibatma and Parmatma both are sakhaya and sayuja. Now many bubbles like jibatma can be absorbed by absolute. Then why sakhaya?
They don't contradict actually. Nasadiya sukta talks about the first stage of creation while dwa suparna... talks about the state of universe once it comes into existence. -- Swami Samarpanananda
Such subtle philosophy... And such great explanation...! Pranam 🙏
Please upload more such lectures.I definitely know there are a very few people viewing these kind of lect.But these few people, including me,need this.🙏
Swami Pranams. Thank you very much once again for this pravochanam. It was not the easiest suktam to understand and you have made it so easy and sweet to grasp.I will now go through your earlier discourses.
Awesome..Never understood creator and
creation better till now .
This definately needs more views. Unbiased knowledge
Hardly anyone watches these talks.
@@IndianSpiritualHeritage we can never be pessimistic 🙏
The first two hymns "Nardya Suktam" takes one to different dimension of wonderment!! To me it appears as if it indicates that creation happened through nothingness since it reads नासदासीन्नो सदासीत्तदानीं नासीद्रजो नो व्योमा परो यत् |किमावरीवः कुह कस्य शर्मन्नम्भः किमासीद्गहनं गभीरम् ॥ १॥न मृत्युरासीदमृतं न तर्हि न रात्र्या अह्न आसीत्प्रकेतः |आनीदवातं स्वधया तदेकं तस्माद्धान्यन्न परः किञ्चनास ॥२॥ Meaning "There was neither death nor immortality then. There was no distinguishing sign of night nor of day. That One breathed, windless, by its own impulse. Other than that there was nothing beyond."
The third hymn tends to define this "Nothingness" as dark within the dark and within this emptiness lies life-force energy. I am not sure what the reference of water and power of heat means in this hymn.( Probably it indicates fluid state of creation and heat indicates Sun?)तम आसीत्तमसा गूहळमग्रे प्रकेतं सलिलं सर्वाऽइदम् |तुच्छ्येनाभ्वपिहितं यदासीत्तपसस्तन्महिनाजायतैकम् ॥३॥
Fourth hymn is also very interesting which indicates first desire to create came in cosmic mind. This cosmic mind can be known through wisdom by sages and learned. कामस्तदग्रे समवर्तताधि मनसो रेतः प्रथमं यदासीत् |सतो बन्धुमसति निरविन्दन्हृदि प्रतीष्या कवयो मनीषा ॥४॥
🙏🏻
🙏🙏🙏 Simply awesome. It is so elaborate and easy to understood.
Swamiji … if one cannot fathom the origin of it all, then isn’t all else speculation?
Btw I’m very impressed with your frankness about a lot of profound questions
I have grown up in the Advaita tradition but Nasadiya Suktha has made me question it all. If we don’t know for sure the origins of everything, all else seems like what we WANT to believe based on second hand knowledge from our scriptures but we can never know by direct experience or understanding.
I request you to please opine on this
Consciousness manipulates as energy and energy manifests as matter is it correct
Can we get an MP3 version? MP4? 🙏🏽🙏🏽
Dwa suparna sayuja sakhaya samanam brikhsham pari shasyajate tayo anno pipallam swadu atti anashan annya abhi chakshiti. Rig veda mandal 1 sukta 126 mantra 20. Is this hym contradicts nasdiya sukta? Here Nature, Jibatma and Parmatma all three are anadi and nitya. Jibatma and Parmatma both are sakhaya and sayuja. Now many bubbles like jibatma can be absorbed by absolute. Then why sakhaya?
They don't contradict actually. Nasadiya sukta talks about the first stage of creation while dwa suparna... talks about the state of universe once it comes into existence. -- Swami Samarpanananda
Thanks.🙏