FIGHTER JET Factory✈️ Production Engine Manufacturing Lockheed Martin F-35 + F-16 [Assembly line]

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 лип 2024
  • Fighter jet Production line: How jets are manufactured step by step from start to finish? Watch video of assembling Lockheed Jet, Super Hornet Jet and Boeing F-15SA private jet. Assembly plant Manufacturing process step by step about testing and construction speed of sound engine in FACTORY. Hi-Tech Technology
    00:00 Fighter Jet Assembly line
    12:47 Fighter Jet Engine Manufacturing process
    Jet engines: Lockheed F-35, FA-18F Super Hornet, Boeing F-15SA
    #fighterjet #fighterjets #aviation
    ✅What is the most produced fighter jet?
    The aircraft has been produced in over 30 different variants and has seen service with around 50 air forces around the world. While the Russian MiG 21 Fishbed is the most widely produced jet fighter in the world (around 11,000), the US F-16 Fighting Falcon is the most widely produced western fighter.
    ✅Who produces fighter jets?
    Lockheed Martin and Boeing are the only two U.S. companies that currently build fighter jets. Another reason for disclosing the NGAD project: Roper wants companies to invest more in digital design technology.
    ✅Is the F 16 still in production?
    The Air Force is “looking to advance the capability” of its Falcons, she said. The current backlog will keep the F-16 in production through 2025, Evans noted, but Lockheed would consider increasing the rate of production if demand increases.
    ✅How does a jet engine start up?
    This starting process normally uses an electric motor to spin the main turbine shaft. ... The electric motor spins the main shaft until there is enough air blowing through the compressor and the combustion chamber to light the engine. Fuel starts flowing and an igniter similar to a spark plug ignites the fuel.
    ✅How long does it take to start a jet engine?
    The compressed kerosene-air mixture then ignites, after which the motor then operates independently. This operation is carried out for each engine, generally one after the other, and takes about one minute. This jet engine automatic start procedure is the most common.
    👉Can Jets take off vertically?
    A vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aircraft is one that can hover, take off, and land vertically. This classification can include a variety of types of aircraft including fixed-wing aircraft as well as helicopters and other aircraft with powered rotors, such as cyclogyros/cyclocopters and tiltrotors.
    👉How does a Harrier jet take off vertically?
    A Harrier jet can takeoff or land vertically because the jet engine provides a stream of fast moving air through nozzles attached to the side of the engine. A system that controls the rotation of the nozzles directs the air (thrust) downward. ... Air passes through the fan and LP (low-pressure) compressor system.
    👉How does vertical take off work?
    They can also take off and land like a normal airplane. A helicopter's spinning blades create thrust like a large propeller, but the thrust is directed vertically. This allows the vehicle to take off and land vertically and to hover. ... The wing then provides lift, and the rotor provides thrust like a propeller.
    👉Why can't planes take off vertically?
    Fighter jet engines need a lot of fuel, and at the beginning of the flight the aircraft will be too heavy for vertical climb. Also, the landing gear would need to be rearranged if the plane is to take off from any airport.
    jet productions,jet manufacturing,manufacturing jet engine,jet assembly,jet factory,fighter jet production,fighter jet assembly,fighter jet assembly line,tejas fighter jet assembly,fighter jet manufacturing process,fighter jet factory,indian fighter jet factory,fighter jet engine assembly,jet engine asssembly,jet engine production,jet engine manufacturing,starting a fighter jet engine,fighter jet starting up,fighter jet engines starting
    Epic Unease by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommons.org/licenses/...
    Source: incompetech.com/music/royalty-...
    Artist: incompetech.com/
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 32

  • @MiasFactory
    @MiasFactory  Рік тому +3

    Compare with SAAB Gripen JAS-39 Assembly process: ua-cam.com/video/d5ot-u8gxWU/v-deo.html

    • @MrDregNET
      @MrDregNET Рік тому +1

      and the spelling ? It should be SAAB JAS -39 Gripen type E

    • @MiasFactory
      @MiasFactory  Рік тому +1

      @@MrDregNET Thanks a lot... I just rewrite it correctly

  • @snorttroll4379
    @snorttroll4379 Рік тому +1

    in stead of many bolts, one should uuse a slide in place pattern and then a clicking mechanism or just one bolt to keep the part in place.

    • @MiasFactory
      @MiasFactory  2 місяці тому

      If you get a job in this factory you can definitely suggest it and maybe it will change the whole production process :)

    • @snorttroll4379
      @snorttroll4379 2 місяці тому

      lol. no you have to come in from above for that. buy the factory. @@MiasFactory

  • @GraczPierwszy
    @GraczPierwszy 11 місяців тому +2

    primitive technology for me

    • @MiasFactory
      @MiasFactory  2 місяці тому

      Wow, you must be really super smart with technology.

    • @GraczPierwszy
      @GraczPierwszy 2 місяці тому

      @@MiasFactory You don't even have a clue

  • @snorttroll4379
    @snorttroll4379 Рік тому

    too many rivets. wtf.

  • @lielyncher755
    @lielyncher755 Рік тому +1

    Well, with a 1600 or whatever mile range, it's obvious that there's no place to store a mere 1000 gallons of fuel. These are practically free energy devices.

    • @MiasFactory
      @MiasFactory  2 місяці тому

      It's all about aerodynamics and the benefits of being able to move through the air

  • @daschc01
    @daschc01 Рік тому +1

    Superior dominance, superior capability....let's get some superior health care in this country first.

    • @snorttroll4379
      @snorttroll4379 Рік тому

      vote trump. dummy. He allowed the health care stuff to compete across border lines. that is a beginning.

    • @lostchild7774
      @lostchild7774 11 місяців тому +2

      The Military should never come second. Without free healthcare, you have expensive healthcare. Without a military, you have no country.

  • @TrongNguyen-dv1ir
    @TrongNguyen-dv1ir Рік тому

    Nguyễn Văn Trọng ta nói chuyện vũ khí ta tính được hết vẫn dùng được hết tất cả mà không phải chết người vẫn có thu nhập cao khủng kể cả mấy bây vvv

  • @neoliberalerneandertaler9347
    @neoliberalerneandertaler9347 8 місяців тому

    To many deutsch

  • @TrongNguyen-dv1ir
    @TrongNguyen-dv1ir Рік тому

    Nguyễn Văn Trọng ta nói là phải nghe lời thời đại nào cũng vậy vua nào cũng vẫn có chúa chỉ dạy học ít nhiều chứ không phải là giỡn để cho làm việc cái làm chết người lung tung hết vậy sống ở như thế nào gọi là không có tội giàu có như thế nào để gọi là không có tội đó ta bảo đi cang thiệp để không phải chiến tranh thì ta vẫn khen ngợi Mỹ và các đất nước chứ không phải là ta không nói chuyện đến nhưng vấn đề là chết quá nhiều vì vậy phải khắc phục ta nói cho mà biết xe lao xuống quá mức ta phải thắng lại cho mà sống sót ta hỏi nếu chết hết liệu y nguyên giòng họ tổng thống các đất nước có để y nguyên không chứ sao ta la hoài mà không chịu hiểu biết lo đi học

  • @TrongNguyen-dv1ir
    @TrongNguyen-dv1ir Рік тому

    Nguyễn Văn Trọng ta nói mà không nghe lời ta ta sai trên trời dưới đất đi đưa rước về nơi yên nghỉ nơi cuối cùng cả giòng họ thì đừng hòng mà trách móc ta

  • @harry8201
    @harry8201 Рік тому +7

    I call it thr flying 1.7 trillion dollar flying junk making lockheed filthy rich. This jet is famous for crash landing almost everytime. Go watch the videos

    • @MiasFactory
      @MiasFactory  Рік тому +1

      Thanks a lot for your comment... Lockheed is not bad, but SAAB is much better company... (i think)

    • @malcolmmckinlay2143
      @malcolmmckinlay2143 Рік тому

      Rubbish, what are you some sort of a commie

    • @8gomerpyle22
      @8gomerpyle22 Рік тому

      Probably Elon Musk needs to take over manufacture of the F35

    • @snorttroll4379
      @snorttroll4379 Рік тому

      @@8gomerpyle22 he wouldcall it m35

    • @ImBigFloppa
      @ImBigFloppa 10 місяців тому +3

      In order to arm the US Air Force, US marines, and US Navy with their primary fighter, as well as develop and install upgrades, and also maintain and fly the aicraft over the course of more than half a century will cost $1.7t in 2070 dollars, or about $1.3t in current dollars, or $26b a year, or about 3.5% of our yearly military budget. I don't know about you, but spending less than 5% of our annual military budget to get the best multirole fighter on the planet is an absolute bargain.
      Also it isn't famous for crash landing. To you F-35 haters it may be. In reality, the F-35 has a lower crash rate than any other fighter jet on the planet in all of human history. 6 hull loss crashes in 12 years of service with 1000 units made is unheard of. Literally the safest fighter ever built.