Star Wars STARSHIPS dimensions
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 вер 2024
- ✅New updated video about all Star Wars: • STAR WARS | Real Scale...
Not all the ships of Star Wars. Only the most important.
Music: North Sea - Riot
--Síguenos en----
-Blog: alvarograciamon...
-Facebook: / metaballstudios
--CAMISETAS MBS--
www.latostadora...
✅New updated video about all Star Wars: ua-cam.com/video/nHo_J5FtJ58/v-deo.html
don't suppose you have shots of each of these vesseles / vehicles on their own next to c3po. im looking to make some from scratch for 28mm scale and need a rough size comparisson for each of the ships
Hm
I was there when the Imperial Destroyer appeared in the sky over London, it was crazy!
ssssuuuuuuurrrrreeee
don't worry the Imperium Of Man has your back and we have bigger ships
Made my day xD thank you
he did or i did?
lincoln king Just both of you :P
This really puts to scale how big the Droid control ship really was, as well as the eclipse
A giant Donut
You're serious? The 2nd Death Star was THAT much larger?
160km vs 900km
Michael Moen in a comic from the EU it was said it was 900km, but in the new canon i think its just 160 km which makes a lot more sense
Nitramex
The estimation also comes from the super star destroyer crashing into the death star in episode 6.
+Nitramex No it doesn't how can somthing so small of 160km destroy a planet like earth...
the original diameters were: 120 km (1st death star) and 160 km (2nd death star)... dont know what disney did with them but these were the the facts before some time
1st: starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Death_Star
2nd: starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Death_Star_II
Edit: Just saw that there are the facts for Canon AND Legends... and both say the same. 160 km and 900 km is just wrong.
A lot of these were significantly out of scale.
Yeah this video was bullshit. The imperial shuttle was taller than the damn ATAT.
@@lukeschilperoort9934 Look it up. AT-AT's are actually pretty small. way smaller than you might think. They are short and bulky. it's the new AT-ACT that is tall af.
@@lukeschilperoort9934 and the interdictor Cruiser was Never as big as an Imperial Class Star Destroyer. There was a Star Destroyer Class with Gravity well projectors in Legends but that wasn't the Original interdictor
@RFS Korolev you're wrong. Multiple huge mistakes in this comparison
@@monsterlord8327 exactly
Venator looks kind of screwy. Thanks for including the Consular! Really helped visualize it for a SW RPG campaign I'm running.
I agree it’s skinny
The bow is triangular in the picture, it should be more curved and flattened
that is because the ship that appears in the place of the venator, is not the venator is a chansellor class battlecrusier
The Y- Wing was definitely longer than the X-Wing, and the size difference between the two Death Stars isn't that big.
Came to the comments just to make this point. The Y-Wing is a bomber, significantly bigger than a fighter like the X-Wing.
the x wing was 12m the y wing was 12.5m
Yes but He got the Death Star ii scale from the scene where executor crashes into it the Death Star should have been curved but it wasn’t this was also in battlefront 2
Y wing is 16m, DS1 is 160km, DS2 is 200km
i can agree. i dont think building that size of the DS2 is gonna cost them 5 years.
You got the Death Star sizes wrong. The first death star has a diameter of 120km and the second one has a diameter of 160km, according to Wookieepedia.
SpringtrapFan2015 VEVO Alright mate, fucking hell, calm down.
I didn't think the second one was that big
+Matt, King of the North It is actually 900km according to the internet.
+SpringtrapFan2015 VEVO Obvious fail troll.
+Matt, King of the North
Various sources state the first Death Star has a diameter of between 140 and 160 kilometers. There is a broader range of figures for the second Death Star's diameter, ranging from 160 to 900 kilometers.
Here you Go.
Although I appreciate the intent and the effort that went into this, there are some definite problems here. The Y-wing was not smaller than the X-wing, which is obvious by just watching the movie. The walker is also way too small in its comparison with these ships. Remember, it crushed a snowspeeder underfoot, and although X- and Y-wings are larger, it definitely could have crushed them too.
Ive seen the movies a million times, and I always assumed the Death Stars were about equally sized.
It does makes sense that the 2nd one was a bit bigger though.
But 900 km in diameter? Doesnt seem right.
Maths isnt my top subject, but thats gotta be at least 200 times the volume of the first death star.. and it took them something like 15 years to comstruct the first one, right?
Other commentors say its supposed to be 160km, and that seems a lot more feasible to me.
Math people did estimates on the 2nd death star and yes it is in fact at least in star wars legends 900 km
It’s wildly not to actual scale, the real canon size is 200km
Seems to be a point of contention, 180-200km have been quoted in canon but so has 900km. 180 seems more realistic based on the time spent obviously, but 900km lines up better with what is actually seen in the movie, such as when the executor crashes into the DSII. I would be more likely to accept 900km but it's the minority opinion.
I thought it was the size of a moon
Its pretty dumb. Wars are won by strategic use of limited resources. The resources invested into making that large of a ship like the Death Start II could have built millions upon millions of Tie Fighter advanced ships that could have swarmed the rebel fleets to pieces and taken out every X-wing and Y-wing they had leaving them defenseless. Star Wars isn't really supposed to make sense, you're just supposed to take away that the white male patriarchy is bad and the PoC matriarchy is good.
My dream ship for personal non-combative use has always been the Naboo Royal Starship. It’s just the best looking ship I’ve ever seen.
Death Star II is way to big.
you meant way tooo small its even bigger than this
@@czarnakoza9697 nope
The first model was stated to be 120-160 the 2nd was said to be 200 not 900 thats enough budget to build a small planet
The 900 not the 200
Starkiller :D
The Interdictor was not the size of a Star Destroyer.
Well, considering that it was technically a variant of the Imperial I-class Star Destroyer, it probably was, actually....
Kartissa I've already determined this comparison video is very incorrect with the sizes. I know the interdictor wasn't that big because the empire specifically created the interdictor star destroyer to compensate for the smaller and more vulnerable interdictor cruiser.
1M0RTAL_CH1CKEN There are 2 sizes of Imperial ship capable of projecting gravity wells to pull ships out of hyperspace. The one depicted is clearly the Kuat Drive Yards Interdictor, which *is* the same size as an Imperial I-class Star Destroyer.
I think the confusion comes from the fact that 'Interdictor' is a role, rather than a ship class. *Any* ship can be called an Interdictor if it can pull other ships out of hyperspace.
Kartissa lol it looks like my brain completely shut off.
in canon there is only one interdictor and it is called "interdictor class star destroyer" but is about one third of the size of the Imperial star destroyer
Just came across this video by accident and I’m absolutely blown away by these animations! This is so cool and I’m sure every enthusiast of Star Wars ships and vehicles celebrates this great work!
Generally, I think Lucasfilm should reconsider the sizes of some vehicles. There are few that are just way off...
Thank you so much for this comparison.
That is one hell of a big death star II, i always thought it was just a bit bigger than it's first model.
1:58
"It's too small to be a moon."
Uh.....
A lot of these are wrong. An A-wing wouldn't be that gigantic compared to a freaking tank, and it certainly isn't that size compared to an X-wing.
Y-wing's too small along with the AT-AT, yadda yadda. I could go on, but I don't want to deplete UA-cam of its storage space.
That's what I was thinking the whole time. The one that stuck out to me was the Jedi star fighter compared to the tie bomber
+★iteachvader★ an A wing a small agile fighter dependant on its low profile to be successful in dogfights.
bigger target than a tank
Jerec 12 Man, that sounds just plain hilarious.
***** no wonder rogue squadron kept to the X wing, at least there you had shields if you got hit
He's comparing length
from description: "Not all the ships of Star Wars. Only the most important." why the hell is the E-wing there then?!
lol
+I Flooper don't get me started with the droid TIE-starfighter and the TIE-defender
+Dennis Weidema yeah those also
And why no B-wing
the B-wing is @0:37
Y wing is about 16m, 1st death star is 120km and 2nd is 160km. These among many other things, are inaccurate.
TuneTycoon
Benjamin Swindle yes?
TuneTycoon 2nd death star was supposed to be 900 km in a comic
Eduardo Saborío expanded universe is not canon.
long live EU!die disney die!
The Executor is the size of Manhattan! This really puts it's size into perspective.
I'm waiting tor Disney to realize their 'digital assets' are being used all over the internet. Does a 'digital asset' have copyright or ownership. This is the next issue thats starting to loom for creators now. Be very careful.
1:58 That's no moon!
What about Malevolence? XD Yeah it appeared for only three episodes in the Star Wars: the Clone Wars 2008 show, but... eh... fine -3-
potitishogun2961997 About 3 Venators long.
Bryce something Exactly xD
the executor was only in 2 movies and did a lot less than te malevolence so it should be in here
The Joker i know that the executor is in this vid, what i meant is that the malevolence did more than the executor but still is not in this vid
If I remember correctly, it's 5000 meters long.
The death star II was way too big compared to the death star
Death Star 1 is only 120km too
deuwibieey "only"
160 km
Man the "debates" over the 2nd Death Star's size are so repetitive it's surreal. I don't know if anyone will ever see this, but hopefully this comment clears it up.
In the Legends/Pre-Disney canon, most sources referred to DSII's size as 160 km. Some sources, such as the Complete Locations book and certain comments from people who worked on the film suggest 900 km. The 900 km was probably the size used in the production,which is implied by certain visuals (e.g. the station being roughly 1/10th the diameter of Endor, a moon that appears to be terrestrial in size as well as its curvature being barely noticeable when the Executor crashes into it). Similar controversies surrounded the size of DSI, with 160 km initially appearing in many sources but eventually formally superseded by 120 km.
Disney canon sources use 200 km for DSII and 160 km for DSI.
Really all of this falls to which canon and which source you prefer.
Despite some possible inaccuracies, this was still a really cool video. Lots of time and effort put into these. Digging the music too. Very nice.
i can´t believe the x-wing is only 0.5 meters shorter than y-wing
+Dave Jacob It's not. It's a mistake. It should be something around 16 metres long. Shit happens. You can check it out on Wookiepedia, for example.
+Dave Jacob still it should look bigger and a little bit bulkier, it seems to small compared to the X wing
+Phillip Bathory Yeah, the Y-wing should be more bulkier.
0.5 meters? that's tiny
Nobody:
Mom: How many ties you got in your room
Me:
P a n Z e r 0 😂
That Y wing looked too small
Instant *Like* and *Share* for featuring my only ever-beloved Republic's capital ship, the _'Venator'_ ❤️
wow, the Rebel Transport is much smaller than I thought! Great video! That droid control ship transition was fantastic!
Why do all o these skip over the "malevolence"!?
I love malvolence sadly it isnt here :(
Read the fucking description and look at the date
"Not all the ships of Star Wars. Only the most important."
There.Does that solve your problem?
And yes, I know the video was made in late 2015 and Malevolence existed then
I had a lego malevolence
Alisdair Kennedy no not really since the e-wing is here and that’s far less important than the malevolence
The Death Star II, to be honest, should be about that size, but it aint.
why does the Y-Wing look so small?
Because it's incorrect in the video
It's just a model in the video, he is larger than both E and X wings. As stated.
Yeah. Model and numbers didn't match. Still pretty sweet vid.
I was like WTF the Young is smaller than the XWing?
EpicMarioBros is it miles or meters
The XWing and TIE Fighter series of games had Interdictors portrayed as much smaller than that, closer to Victory Class size. That always felt more appropriate to me. The Armada tabletop game, however, has them at the larger size. And I was always under the impression that Death Star 2 was only about 25% larger than the first one.
1:21 that Interdictor has the model of the Immobilizer 418 cruiser which was only 600m long, the Interdictor class Star Destroyer was indeed 1,6km long, though it looked different
Very cool! I think the only addition i would make would be to add a yuuzhan vong worldship.
0:36
Look at the x wing and the AT-AT. In the movies, the X wing is a small craft that can fly in between and around the legs. So the AT-AT is way off in size.
It can't QUITE do that.
Based on assessment of the AT-AT's HEIGHT, it's LENGTH would be some 26 metres long, so about twice that of an X-Wing.
@@chrissonofpear1384 watch TESB where the X wing flies circles around the AT-AT.
That was a T-47 snowspeeder though, and only around 4.5 to 5 metres long.
@@marks6663 That was a T-47 Airspeeder not an x-wing.
0:50: millenium falcon
1:20: Imperial SD I
1:27: Eclipse
1:28: Executor
1:35: Both DSs
hombre esta, alucinante ya pasaron 3 años desde la ultima vez que se publico este vídeo, hazlo otra vez, pero con las nuevas naves que han salido e estas ultimas películas, y con algo de color, por fas¡¡¡
I'm a few years late, but I had no idea how much bigger the second death star was compared to the first. I assumed it was 50% bigger, but holy crap, it looks like it's at least 7x the size of the first. No wonder they had so much trouble completing it on time 😆
I read that the first one took 20 years to complete, then they learned from their mistakes and the second one would have only taken 7 years. When Jedi was launched, it was about 5 years in...two more and it would have been unstoppable.
Biggest rebel ship: 8,5 km long
Death Star the first: 160km diameter
Second Death Start: 900km !!
Fan: *_wHy DoN't UsEd ReBeL fIGhTeR tO rAm DeAtH sTaR sO u WoN't LoSe MaNy PeOpLe_*
It's crazy to think that us humans can construct something as big and complex as the Death Star.
Incredible.
Star Wars isn't real you fucking dolt lol
0:20 what?! that must be wrong! look at the difference in cockpit size!
David Nobre the Y-wing is also way too small
yap
It's the wings. Their pretty long.
They sort the ship sizes by length
I should probably get some sleep, but these UA-cam recommended videos are just too damn tempting
Which surprises me is not that the 2nd death star was larger (which alone is a difference between the first and the reason they went with it) but the fact the thing was operation just 1 movie after the first one was destroyed.
First Death star was much smaller, in planning since before the Clone Wars in Episode II and yet it only became operational during Episode IV.
maybe the emperor just decided to go with an skeleton functional structure instead.
Way more accurate than the last one (aside from Death Star II being 900km)
Wow www www qqqqq
And the CR-90 corvette being 126 meters long when it's actually 150 meters long.
Actually, the Death Star was 120 km in diameter and the Death Star II was 160 km.
Yoda's Escape Pod, Droid Tri-Fighter, Geonosian Starfighter, Solar Sailer, Wookie Catamaran, Droid Gunship, Neimoidian Shuttle, Techno Union Starship, Banking Clan Frigate, Commerce Guild Starship, Invisible Hand?
Still a good video though!
Imagine one day a floating dorito shows up in the sky
Ships I noticed were missing that were at least somewhat important: Malevolence, Dreadnought, Snoke’s Ship, Invisible Hand (Grievous’ Ship in ROTS). Did I forget any others?
I love his videos and they are all very accurate and include every last ship in any series he does but he forgot one ship that had a big impact in a starwars episode season: the Malevolence! like boy that ship was insane and I would love to have seen that included
Eso, si es enorme ._.
Nunca vi a escala las Megas Estructuras que el imperio fabricaba, pero ahora si se su capacidad al poner a trabajar casi todos los planetas xD
Who told you all this false information? The Death Star is 120x120x120km and The Death Star II is 160x160x160km. get yo facts straight!
Death star II is way bigger than that
no...
If the death star 2 was 900KM then it would look way bigger against endor and if it was so big then how would the empire be able to finish it in 6 years compared the death star 1's 10 years...
@@benpretorius2926 i heared somewhere that thy started to build both deathstars arround the same time
@Dryder Nope Death star 2 construction began shortly after the destruction of the first death star
Random dud no if death star 2 was smaller we would see it curve when the executor fell on it
After all these years of Star Wars, the Millennium Falcon is still the coolest looking ship in the galaxy.
Me encato la comparación con las ciudades, es muy util par darte una idea de su verdero tamaño.
Even the first death star is huge . How much energy would it need to travel in space with it?
just check 10 second: TIE fighter 6 m long and on its left is twice smaller ship which has 5.47. Ridicules scale
I think it's just about length not height or anything else
TIEs have received varying (and confusing) scales, recently.
Awe, no Viscount-Class Star Defender.
I wanted to see that too bud :)
Yeah, it looks pretty cool.
Your modelling skills are amazing
If the numbers are right then the ships are wrong. example, the imperial star destroy is 1,600m, the mon calamari Cruiser is 1,200m long(300m difference) and the Victory cruiser is 900m(300m different again) but the mon calamari cruiser and Victory are the same size instead of the mon calamari cruiser being between.
Just imagine a Death Star the size of Earth....
Starkiller base is as big as a planet
Because it IS a planet.
How did I not know the Death Stars were different sizes?
gnbman they aren't. This video is incorrect
@@apersononyoutube2228 they were, but not so big the diference, te first one had 120 meters, and the second 160 meters
The scale on some of these looks off. Especially next to the AT-AT
I find it hard to believe the Droid control ship is THAT big.
*Star wars*
*Spaceships*
*1. Snowspeeder T - 47* (4.5m)
*2. ETA -2 Actis* (5.47m)
*3. TIE Fighter* (6m)
*4. TIE Droid* (6.3m)
*5. Droid starfighter* (6.96m)
*6. Storm IV Twin - pod cloud car*
(7m)
*7.TIE Bomber* (7.8m)
*8. Jedi starfighter* (8m)
*9. TIE Advanced [Vader's TIE]*
(9.2m)
*10. TIE Defender* (9.2m)
*11. TIE Interceptor* (9.6m)
*12. A - wing* (9.6m)
*13. E - wing* (11m)
*14. Naboo N-1Fighter* (11m)
*15. x - wing* (12m)
*16. Y- wing* (12.5m)
*17. ARC 170* (14.5m)
*18. B- wing* (16m)
*19. LAAT* (17.4m)
*20. T - 4A Lambda* (20m)
*21. Slave* (21m)
*22. Scimitar* (26.5m)
*23. Millennium Falcon* (34m)
*24. Bebop Royal starship* (76m)
*25. Rebel Transport GR - 75*
( 90m)
*26. CR 90 Carvelle* (126m)
*27. C-9979 Landing craft*
(149m)
*28. Radiant VII* (175m)
*29. EF76 Nebulon - B* (300m)
*30. Care ship* (690m)
*31. Acclamator* (752m)
*32. Destroyer victory II* (900m)
*33. Venator* (1.115m)
*34. MC80 star cruiser* (1.200m)
*35. Interdictor* (1.600m)
*36. Destroyer Imperial I*
(1.600m)
*37. Droid control ship* (3.170m)
*38. Mediator* (8.500m)
*39. Arc Hammer* (9.500m)
*40. sovereign* (15.000m)
*41. Eclipse* (17.500m)
*42. Executor* (19.000m)
*43. Death star* (160km)
*44. Death star-II* (900km)
*Thanks* to *MBS studios*
I have difficulties accepting that an Interdictor would be larger than an Imperial I star destroyer.
and longer then an MC 80
chris pearson starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Immobilizer_418_cruiser
Pandora Hades Interdictor Star Destroyer, it’s an ISD with interdictor capabilities
@@pandorahades617 starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Interdictor-class_Star_Destroyer
@@PhabioTheHost still smaler then an MC80
Increíble el trabajo, ¿Como habeis hecho para conseguir esos modelos con esas medidas tan exactas?
Me suscribo
+MrDeku73 Gracias, los modelos no tenían las medidas adecuadas, tuve que investigar cuales son los tamaños y adaptarlos.
MetaBallStudios eres español o inglés?
@@vynotra5527 al principio del video dice españa así que si
@@dylanloza8 un poco tarde noma XDDDD
@@vynotra5527 más vale tarde que nunca
In new canon, death star 2 is 160km dm? Am I right?
Yes, you are.
I didn't watch all of this video but was the U wing there?????
Why would the U wing be there, look at the date he posted the video
Konigstiger the new canon is shit
Konigstiger that's fucking retarded but then again so is the entire new garbage material.
If you guys complain About the Size Of Interdictor here why:
There are a 3 type Interdictor: Interdictor,Immobalizer,and Interdictor Vessel'
Interdictor:1600M
Immobalizer:600M
Interdictor Vessel:1200M
Soo the interdictor that were here was the Normal Interdictor
The AT-AT is gigantic, but we rarely know the scale of the other ships because they are horizontal and usually in space where we have nothing to compare to but other ships.
Interdictor cruiser is way smaller than Impy star deuce... ever play TIE fighter or xwing alliance?
And death star 2 wasnt even close to that big. Wtf.
No, you are talking about the Immobilizer, which is indeed about the size of a victory class.
Sources differ. Some say 160km DS1 and 900km DS2, and some say 160km DS1 and 900km DS2. To be fair, the shot where the Executor crashes into the DS2 doesn't look much like the DS2 is only 10 times bigger in diameter, looks way bigger.
TonyOneBlairoby The interdictor was around the length of the victory
Haras comparativas de otras sagas, como halo o mass effect.
+Kevin Frias Si, puede que haga más
+MetaBallStudios genial, gracias los espero con ansias
+MetaBallStudios De halo!!!
El las hizo en Septiembre del año pasado
+kuif234 pero me refiero a que se concentre en solo las naves de una saga, como lo hace aqui.
No starkiller base
Only two issues that I can see is the Interdictor (There was an Interdictor using an ISD hull but that looked different), and the Death Star II. The Interdictor that has that model is around 600 meters long, while the Death Star II is normally said to be 160 or 200 km.
My satisfaction meter is over 9000
The second death star was not that much bigger than the first
It was supposed to be that big
the second death star is only 190km not 900
Oliver Hodgson it's actually 160KM
the17kyd is actually 200km
Death star 2 is 160 km tho
Feel like the y-wing should be a little bigger but otherwise looks pretty accurate good job!
Very very very good...
Where’s the Malevolence?
It should be there.
its wrong!! death star 2 is 160 km
Both numbers are based on a reliable sources but 160km is correct. Otherwise episode 7 makes no sense.
well it was a special effect and not what the canon is.
Disney's cannon is terrible. Your question do not make sense.
"is" is in the wrong place.
Well you can put "is" in front of 160km and it make a it makes a lot more sense.
Inaccurate sizes
What, like how the Nebulon-B is literally closer to 340 metres, for instance?
The fucking death star 2 is 160-200 not a 900 km there also some ships smaller than whats actully shown in movies and in info pages
If only Snoke's ship was in this now, like if they made a new version of this video with the newly added ships
You have a perfect name and profile picture
this is the first vid i watched from u when i was 8 :]
Ik man i was 9 when this came out and it feels so nostalgic
true@@nikolasrpak6187
Both sides must have an strong economy.
The Death Star 2 is wrong.
its not a "super stardestroyer" its called a star dreadnought
it is a dreadnought but it is still called super star destroyer
Estaria bien un remake de este video con tus herramientas más nuevas ya que las he visto y esta muy bien trabajado, ademas de que en las peliculas ya han salido nuevas naves.
I never actually thought that the Death Star and Death Star II differed in size.
Yeah no offense but those aren't all accurate
Where is Starkiller base?
Mad Max it's just a planet with a gun attached to it.
not a ship a base
It has to be able to travel to be classified as a ship
Starkiller Base can't, but the Death Star I and II can through hyperspace
that's not star wars
Mihai Lazar Yes it is lol
Oye y el Starkilller?
+Jazi244 cual es esa?
Creo que asi se llamaba la nueva estrella de la muerte del episodio 7
+Jazi244 No he encontrado información oficial sobre su tamaño, y preferido no arriesgar con comparativas con la estrella de la muerte.
Que bien muchos dicen que es mucho mas grande
+Jazi244 de hecho, en la película las comparan en forma de hologramas. la base starkiller comparada con la estrella de la muerte 1 es aprox, 30 veces mas grande :v
Didn't realize the second Death Star was that much bigger than the first
That was really cool and thanks for posting this!
The Eclipse is very Bigger than the Executor
Executor is longer I think
Oh right. O found a text over that. The eclipse is 2.5 Kilometers longer
Oh god, no the executor is 2.5 Kilometers longer
But the Interdictor is not so big
it is now. for a long time it was believed the Executor was about 1/2 the length it currently is.
Como se llama la cancion que us usastes para este video?
+Elias Padilla Mira en la descripcion
+MetaBallStudios you Miss that spaceship call starkiller base over 900-1200 km
+Tyler M Master starkiller base is bigger than that is like 10 times the deathstar
Starkiller Base was a planet. 1200KM isn't nearly large enough to hold an atmosphere that thick. I think it's more akin to the size of earth
Gio98art But starkiller base it look like a space ship but it a planet
Why cluster them all together? What a stupid format
very nice.
AMAZING original music too!