JFK deleted scenes w/Oliver Stone commentary

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 31 тра 2024
  • NOTE: These deleted scenes & extended parts are not in the theatrical or director's cut of the film
    Director: Oliver Stone
    Cast: Kevin Costner, Kevin Bacon, Tommy Lee Jones, Joe Pesci, Laurie Metcalf, Gary Oldman, Michael Rooker, Jay O. Sanders, Sissy Spacek, Jack Lemmon, Walter Matthau, Donald Sutherland, John Candy
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,7 тис.

  • @lynnwood7205
    @lynnwood7205 2 роки тому +111

    I was 12 years old when the Republic of the United States was ended. I saw Lee Harvey Oswald shot on the live TV broadcast, my father so stunned he had no time to censor my view but instead calling out to my mother in disbelief.
    I was eighteen when I arrived in Vietnam, spending my 19th and 21st birthday in Vietnam.
    Returned to a changed nation into which I never fit in.
    April 30 1975 found me on the telephone placing an international phone call to Saigon to my college roommate's family in Saigon when the call went dead, the operater came back on and informed us the Trans Pacific cable to Vietnam had been cut off.
    Today I and my sisters visited my parents' gravesite to visit and to assure that the placque noting my father's combat service in the Korean War was placed.
    And now, August 15, 2021, Kabul has fallen.
    Perhaps this American Empire dressed in the trappings of our long dead Republic shall fall too.
    Thank you Oliver Stone. I too served in the Central Highlands.

    • @icitlalistardust9060
      @icitlalistardust9060 2 роки тому +6

      It’s the fate of older generations to live with the landmarks and scars of History…. Let’s hope the younger ones will be spared such a burden!

    • @imar7635
      @imar7635 2 роки тому +12

      @Lynn Wood I'm glad you made it back home from Vietnam ,19 is very young to serve in war ,I remember a song released in 1985 called "19" by a singer Paul Hartcastle , it said the average age of the combat soldier in WW2 was 26 ,in Vietnam it was 19 .Respects to you.

    • @yuothineyesasian
      @yuothineyesasian 2 роки тому +12

      Thank you for serving. Your bravery and the bravery of countless men has been betrayed but not belittled. You fought for all the right reasons, but those reasons and your motivations were betrayed by lies.
      Our servicemen and women are some of the best of us and in their honor we should stop the empire that operates in the interests of elites.

    • @kenmolloy1645
      @kenmolloy1645 2 роки тому +11

      I had the same experience, watched Oswald die on TV and got my draft letter at 19. It was a hell of a time to grow up.

    • @danthomas6587
      @danthomas6587 2 роки тому +9

      I felt the same after 911. When has the government of the US ever told the truth about anything?

  • @johnpatterson4272
    @johnpatterson4272 2 роки тому +95

    These 'deleted' scenes should all be added to a new 'JFK' redux version. Just like 'Apocalypse Now' was later produced with allegedly every deleted sequence from it's original release. It may make the first JFK version over 4 hours long, yet North Americans and perhaps the world will seek out and watch the new movie in its entirety. These scenes are genuinely worthy of a redux treatment; even in 2021.

    • @justthink5854
      @justthink5854 2 роки тому +6

      the movie had way too little of Lee Oswald, who was incredibly complex and never fired a shot that day. yes shots from all over, but the throat and throat HITS came from the south knoll close to the overpass. JFK was blown BACK and then fell/pulled by Jackie who had her right hand on his shoulder asking what was wrong as JFK struggled from the throat hit. a shot from the north or grassy knoll could not have hit JFK's head as it would have been perpendicular right to left. ua-cam.com/video/c8emNECYgmg/v-deo.html

    • @A-small-amount-of-peas
      @A-small-amount-of-peas 2 роки тому +4

      @@justthink5854 This has nothing to do with the original comment. You just used it to go off on a tangent about the real life Lee Harvey Oswald

    • @justthink5854
      @justthink5854 2 роки тому +2

      @@A-small-amount-of-peas so?

    • @A-small-amount-of-peas
      @A-small-amount-of-peas 2 роки тому +2

      @@justthink5854 says a lot about you. Interesting

    • @justthink5854
      @justthink5854 2 роки тому +1

      @@A-small-amount-of-peas thanks!

  • @DelightLovesMovies
    @DelightLovesMovies 3 роки тому +55

    Oliver Stone made a lot of great films and JFK is one of them.

    • @stevedotwood
      @stevedotwood 2 роки тому +2

      That's why it isn't on netflix. You won't find any OS movies on Netflix. I wonder which provider has them. Correction, there is one: Scarface (safe choice)

    • @kxkxkxkx
      @kxkxkxkx 19 днів тому

      Great KGB propaganda 😂 I agree!

  • @timfronimos459
    @timfronimos459 4 роки тому +190

    Man portraying Justice Warren is the REAL Jim Garrison.

    • @randyharris3175
      @randyharris3175 4 роки тому +2

      Jim Garrison could no hold Earl warren jock strap lol

    • @thomasackerly2410
      @thomasackerly2410 3 роки тому +2

      @@randyharris3175 Why would he EW was murderer

    • @duke4384
      @duke4384 3 роки тому +13

      An American hero, truly, we love you Jim Garrison.

    • @duke4384
      @duke4384 3 роки тому +9

      @@randyharris3175 You fuckin idiot !

    • @kellysmyth2337
      @kellysmyth2337 3 роки тому +2

      @@duke4384 that’s definitely Garrison Reccognise his voice

  • @marcos_98.
    @marcos_98. 3 роки тому +47

    Wow, director's cut has 200 minutes and now we see this, imagine a JFK four hour cut

    • @fiveofever2971
      @fiveofever2971 3 роки тому +2

      so instead of 3 hours of fiction you can sit thru 4 hours of fiction

    • @JRennick27
      @JRennick27 3 роки тому +15

      @@fiveofever2971 you’d have to be an idiot to think this movie is fiction. all the evidence suggests there were multiple shooters. you’d think after 57 years people would figure that out by now...

    • @fiveofever2971
      @fiveofever2971 3 роки тому

      @@JRennick27 And only an idiot would make a comment like that. Stone plays fast and loose with the evidence. So now you need to prove multiple shooters. You'd think after 57 years conspiracy kooks would have given up, seeing as your side has never proved one. But it just goes to show cognitive dissonance is a powerful disorder LMAO!

    • @vernpascal1531
      @vernpascal1531 2 роки тому +3

      @@fiveofever2971 Yer opinion is better than Dr. McClelland who said JFK was shot from the front both head and throat...Hell No! Better than Dr. Crenshaw who said the same? Hell No... better than Dr. Perry who was certain throat wound was one of entrance...Hell No! And witness after witness at both Hospitals? An emphatic Hell No...

    • @conzmoleman
      @conzmoleman 2 роки тому +7

      @@fiveofever2971 yeah that must be why everyone keeps ending up shot right before they are called to testify. because there’s no conspiracy. keep telling yourself that

  • @yuothineyesasian
    @yuothineyesasian 2 роки тому +19

    Ruby's psychiatrist was MKUltra doctor Jolly West, whose goals in the program included inducing insanity in a subject without their knowledge.

  • @johnrengifo2452
    @johnrengifo2452 3 роки тому +69

    It’s been an aura of make believe in Washington ever since Kennedy’s death.

    • @crouchingcaterpillar
      @crouchingcaterpillar 2 роки тому +4

      @Maryann MacDonald Agree. JFK's assassination made people question the government after a while, yet many of us know that wasn't the beginning. Or the end.

    • @idiotsavant751
      @idiotsavant751 2 роки тому

      @Maryann MacDonald yes it’s a great book.

    • @slammajamma5435
      @slammajamma5435 2 роки тому +1

      Long, long before that.

    • @bradhuskers
      @bradhuskers 2 роки тому +2

      @@crouchingcaterpillar
      But the thing you're missing is that the left is totalitarian.
      Oliver Stone has always been a radical left wing sociopath. His numerous pathological lies over the past forty years, proves this beyond any and all doubt.
      Today, the left has corrupted the press, media and academia. Alzheimer's Joe is being controlled by radical leftists. The removal of our military BEFORE getting the thousands of people out, will go down as the worst fail in military history. Leaving behind our weapons, technology, helicopters, etc....is indeed gross incompetence by this administration.
      Impeachment should've begin immediately.
      The left wing in this country has successfully brainwashed half the population.
      It's been their goal for decades now.
      And they've actually done it.
      The next generation is completely brainwashed by left wing bullshit propaganda.

    • @crouchingcaterpillar
      @crouchingcaterpillar 2 роки тому

      @@bradhuskers The things you're
      missing are too numerous to list. Look at blank Trumpists nodding along with every crazy thing he says or does, lies with every breath and has convinced a large part of the population into believing he didn't stir up the insurrection, then that it was merely tourists and now that it wasn't so bad. Maybe he also blamed antifa. He needs mental help, handcuffs and prison. That won't fix everything broken. Too many stupid-ass people in Congress. If you knew history, you'd know presidents are controlled. Blame the media, blame the logical left and settle in as a victim. You'll blend in perfectly. I won't waste any more time on right-winger lunacy.

  • @Closertotruth2
    @Closertotruth2 2 роки тому +17

    Ruby was more truthful than the Warren Commission.

  • @sentientarc
    @sentientarc 5 років тому +43

    On the 30th anniversary of John Kennedy's death, 3 networks ran stories on television: PBS Frontline and (I think) ABC and NBC. There was not much on TV that evening so I was bored and changed channels among them.
    2 talked about the audiotape - something I had not heard of. A motorcycle policeman in the motorcade had a stuck mic button on his police radio. Dallas Police made recordings of transmissions at the station so the assassination was on audiotape. Both networks were talking about whether a "4th shot" on the recording was another shot or an echo. Both networks said it was an echo and described where the policeman was and why that caused the echo - but there was a problem. One network said that the motorcycle was behind JFK's limo, the other network said that the motorcycle was in front.
    BOTH Networks interviewed that policeman. He was the same guy, interviewed on different days so, wearing different clothes but clearly the same man. He is actually well known for the stuck microphone, it is but another story buried. When each network asked him to confirm his position in the motorcade, he did. They simply asked him, with camera and microphone. They did not show him their models. The policeman answered "Yes" to BOTH Networks so, "Yes, I was in front of the President's Limo" but also "Yes, I was behind the President's Limo."
    So I was thinking "mistake" not conspiracy and I wrote to one network and pointed out the difference. They did not clarify the point, they posted my name online with other letters but "my letter" was actually a letter making no sense and not asking the question that I asked.
    I was then that I knew that Kennedy had been murdered by conspiracy and the cowards left behind covered it up.
    We should be more advanced as a society instead of facing the problems in our midst but it is because, for instance, selling us oil products has been so very profitable. The wealth and power in the hands of the few who had already demonstrated a willingness to pollute, a willingness to order that people be killed for control of oil and a willingness to mock and block better alternatives like electric vehicles hurt us all in the name of profit for a few. Vietnam was about control of Rubber and Tin. Richard Nixon said so, see Ken Burns' "Vietnam" Episode 1.
    Better ideas should be allowed to succeed because we will all benefit. JFK's assassination, war, famine and other injustices are put upon us by cowardly, greedy scum who do not want progress, they seek control at any cost.

  • @lenurban
    @lenurban 3 роки тому +74

    Oliver Stone is an incredible human being

    • @bob80q
      @bob80q 2 роки тому +3

      no he is a purveyor of disinformation and conspiracy theories, the movie JFK was a total joke

    • @michaelwoodward9894
      @michaelwoodward9894 2 роки тому

      Mr. Stone is so right because if he does not make this movie so many people would believe the danger which President Eisenhower was referring to in his farewell address

    • @robertbruce6865
      @robertbruce6865 2 роки тому +3

      @@bob80q Bingo! I used to buy into all the “it could’ve happened this way” and “it’s possible that this happened” bullshit. Oooooh...it’s a CONSPIRACY...
      Vince Bugliosi’s “Reclaiming History” shatters this garbage, including an entire chapter that dismantles Stone’s nonsense in a detailed, clinical, and prosecutorial fashion. A brilliant takedown of a con artist.

    • @JF-bc2lw
      @JF-bc2lw 2 роки тому

      It’s just naive to believe government has your best interests in mind. Both sides are corrupt.

    • @robertbruce6865
      @robertbruce6865 2 роки тому +2

      @@JF-bc2lw Corruption and Conspiracy are 2 distinctly different topics. I agree w your opinion re: corruption. However, one has nothing to do with the other.

  • @roaddoggypsy9142
    @roaddoggypsy9142 3 роки тому +32

    Mr.Stone made a Historic master piece!
    It says so mush more and brilliantly presented WoW!!
    Thank you.
    Fantasic cast and to you and everyone involved .

    • @bob80q
      @bob80q 2 роки тому +6

      no its a propaganda piece with many badly twisted facts or made up scenes to fit his own version of events

    • @bradhuskers
      @bradhuskers 2 роки тому +3

      @@bob80q
      200% correct.
      It's amazing that millions of weak minded sheep are duped and manipulated so easily.

    • @bradhuskers
      @bradhuskers 2 роки тому +1

      ROAD DOG
      you are an easily duped simpleton for admiring a left wing nutjob like Oliver Stone. His movies have always been littered with pathological lies and bullshit propaganda.

    • @robertbruce6865
      @robertbruce6865 2 роки тому +2

      I urge you to read Vince Bugliosi’s Reclaiming History; in particular, the chapter devoted to shredding the JFK movie. Read it with an open mind, as I did (I used to be a Conspiracy Theorist myself). It shreds the nonsense “what if’s” and “it could’ve happened THIS way” that Stone presents as factual information.

    • @bradhuskers
      @bradhuskers 2 роки тому

      @@robertbruce6865
      I'm already on Vincent's side. Oliver Stone is a left wing nutjob extremist. All his propaganda and revisionist history has been thoroughly debunked.

  • @dallasbrubaker6054
    @dallasbrubaker6054 6 років тому +58

    I saw this movie when it first came out in 1991. Picture this: crowded theater, very quiet, John Candy has a scene. I turned to my left and whispered to my friend, a history professor at a local college, "That is John Candy." He was hard of hearing and yelled out, "That's John Kennedy?"

    • @marla79
      @marla79 6 років тому +3

      Dallas Brubaker 😂

    • @alexthompson9516
      @alexthompson9516 6 років тому +1

      Dallas Brubaker Hahahaha

    • @justthink5854
      @justthink5854 5 років тому +1

      Candy was right on in the movie

    • @austinthomas8464
      @austinthomas8464 5 років тому

      😂

    • @DoctorWu23
      @DoctorWu23 2 роки тому

      He was one of the best performances in the movie. I wish we got more of him so funny lmao

  • @OldMod67
    @OldMod67 2 роки тому +6

    I've only just discovered these out-takes. I had a VHS director's cut back then, but this is so much more! Seeking out loads of old books in the eighties, it became a big interest of mine. I read both books that inspired JFK, On The Trail of The Assassin's and Crossfire, both gripping. JFK is an important film, obviously Stone had to use composite characters for time limitations and to get the film to flow, but the film hold up now, even with evidence evolving overtime and some points innacurate. The acting's superb, nothing lacking. I can see why some of theses scenes were cut, but it's great to see what else was filmed. Thanks for this. By the way, I've just read Josiah Thompson's Last Second in Dallas, my first JFK book in years. Fascinating.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 Рік тому

      Both Jim Garrison and Jim Marrs, writers of those books, were demonstrable and shameless liars, paranoids and crackpots.

  • @deborahharris2962
    @deborahharris2962 2 роки тому +15

    I love listening to Oliver Stone talk about his film, and these scenes.
    I found Garrison's book in a second-hand book shop, in the Fiction section, publisher had it classified as fiction. 😔

    • @sr71ablackbird
      @sr71ablackbird 2 роки тому +4

      if any book( s ) should be in the `fiction' section, it should be that warren report. all 26 volumes of it. if ya notice at time stamp 27:06 the name on the name plate is `E. G. - -- - - sd -e' aka - maj. gen. edward g. landsdale. just wondering why his name was not mentioned. or that of lyman limitzer either. the whole movie raises even more questions as to just exactly who those involved are.

    • @deborahharris2962
      @deborahharris2962 2 роки тому +2

      @@sr71ablackbird yes, now you've made me want to refresh my memory on him. I've read a bit about Lansdale, it's a bit faded. I agree with you, stage managed. That book, I really was on a mission with the book shop to stick that book of Garrisons in the right place. Fiction section way down the back where they had the book, the True Crime and History up the front on it's own sta d more prominent and where a lot of books get read. So I kept at it each time I went in. Glad I got to tell someone in publishing about it, so wrong. Hey and this so called fiction book had photos in it. Unbelievable that it's called fiction with photos of the actual people.
      Cheers.

    • @deborahharris2962
      @deborahharris2962 2 роки тому +2

      @@sr71ablackbird I remember, Lonsdale portrayed in the novel The Quiet American. Will read more on him and that other man. I agree odd that it's hinted at in the movie and video above. I wonder if Stone was bound to only hint for legal reasons. It's a good question, you should write to Oliver. I would.

    • @sr71ablackbird
      @sr71ablackbird 2 роки тому +1

      @@deborahharris2962 not sure, however, i am thinking that he already had, when `mr.x' speaks about `general y'.

    • @PercivalBlakeney
      @PercivalBlakeney 2 роки тому +1

      @Deborah Harris
      I ordered it especially from my local library.
      Scared me even more than the movie.
      😶

  • @bobby.m136
    @bobby.m136 3 роки тому +9

    Oliver Stone is one of the smartest people of are time and should be listened to.

    • @vernpascal1531
      @vernpascal1531 2 роки тому +1

      Yup..If the Media has listened to him instead of the dishonest as hell Lone Nutters we never would have had the insanity of Trump. Also, originally in 1964 very possibly MLK and RFK wouldn't have been killed later on, because a certain ex President and a few others would have went to prison over JFK's killing..

    • @justthink5854
      @justthink5854 2 роки тому

      @@vernpascal1531 you really are an idiot aren't you. the movie had way too little of Lee Oswald, who was incredibly complex and never fired a shot that day. yes shots from all over, but the throat and throat HITS came from the south knoll close to the overpass. JFK was blown BACK and then fell/pulled by Jackie who had her right hand on his shoulder asking what was wrong as JFK struggled from the throat hit. a shot from the north or grassy knoll could not have hit JFK's head as it would have been perpendicular right to left. ua-cam.com/video/c8emNECYgmg/v-deo.html

  • @jimmycakes7158
    @jimmycakes7158 3 роки тому +101

    Files are still locked away, if there's nothing to hide what's the problem? Also if there's nothing to hide, release all the confiscated video and camera material.

    • @stddisclaimer8020
      @stddisclaimer8020 3 роки тому +1

      @k l 4: There is nothing locked away that would prove any conspiracy. The ARRB examined all the files that were not released. After their study was done, they said there was "no smoking gun" in any of them. The files that have not been released are because they contain names of people that are still alive and should be protected; or they detail investigative procedures the FBI does not want publicized. The "hidden" files are the last gasp by conspiracy kooks that have nothing left. They have no evidence of a conspiracy and no clue what else to blame.

    • @stddisclaimer8020
      @stddisclaimer8020 3 роки тому +1

      @Pat M Fours days after the assassination LBJ signed NSAM 273, negating JFK's NSAM 263? Far from negating NSAM 273, NSAM 263 acted to re-affirm it. And it.hardly represented the kind of far-reaching policy initiative that the incipient-withdrawal proponents would suggest. It was but one part of a larger 'selective pressures' policy designed to push the Diem regime into greater effectiveness. The preponderance of the evidence would appear to refute any notion that John Kennedy had decided to withdraw from Vietnam.

    • @stddisclaimer8020
      @stddisclaimer8020 3 роки тому

      @Pat M Having lost on the Liberty Lobby & Vietnam withdrawal fronts, conspiratard, Pat M veers off course, switching topics. As solid evidence for conspiracy, he blithely drops the name of one of the most sleazy, disingenuous, self-aggrandizing, perfidious, false conspiracy peddlers of all time. One who has a record of making statements that sound plausible but that never hold up when compared to the historical record (assassins shooting blanks, the "stand down" order etc.). And he has a record of associations with crackpotish and unsavory groups. Is that really all you've got?
      You know nothing about real research. Your method suffers from an acute case of "confirmation bias" - the tendency to favor information that confirms one's existing beliefs or hypotheses, and to disregard all the rest.

    • @stddisclaimer8020
      @stddisclaimer8020 3 роки тому

      @@RichardM333 No evidence supports what you write. JFK conspiracy enthusiasts think that the YT comments sections is for spewing nonsense. Meanwhile, the facts and the correctly decided verdict remain.

    • @romahnae
      @romahnae 3 роки тому +2

      I guy 3x my age told me that, they were supposed to be released in 2003 but pushed back to 2033. He also mentioned that they’re waiting until all the Kennedy’s dies.

  • @dbaumann25
    @dbaumann25 5 років тому +117

    Ive watched the movie 100 million times and everytime when the final courtroom scene starts i k ow the end is close. Its so long and has so much information but flows perfectly. Great movie.

    • @randyharris3175
      @randyharris3175 4 роки тому +6

      Pure fantasy

    • @randyharris3175
      @randyharris3175 4 роки тому +7

      So much false information

    • @ventsislavstefanov9590
      @ventsislavstefanov9590 4 роки тому +10

      @@randyharris3175 You seem to be on a mission here. Just accept the fact that there are way too many legitimate questions asked regarding this case for people to believe that was a lone guy firing an almost impossible shots in that amount of time with a mediocre weapon at best. It's not as clear what happened as you would like people to believe. The "official" story stinks so much, it's unbearable. There are way too many people and organizations that would benefit from his death, so we can't pinpoint who did it, but if your theory is the official one, you must be out of your damn mind.

    • @randyharris3175
      @randyharris3175 4 роки тому +2

      @@ventsislavstefanov9590 if ruby did not shoot Oswald it would have been super easy case just because you say too many questions does not prove anthing was involved except Oswald you can not just throw out the 53 pieces if evidence against Oswald because you want to name a invisible assasin face it Oswald was a Wierd Bird you can not figure out what was going on in his demented mind

    • @ventsislavstefanov9590
      @ventsislavstefanov9590 4 роки тому +6

      ​@@randyharris3175 That's exactly why I can't wrap my head around the fact that he was good enough to make these shots in less than 6 seconds. But even if we abandon the technicality of it , its too convenient all the events that followed. I do not trust the Warren commission findings one bit, simply because it consists of people invested in the truth to be kept under wraps. All kinds of experts disagree on the matter, why? If is so clear that LHO shot, why files are being hidden away? If there's nothing else to show or know besides the fact that Oswald was guilty why prolong the release of the files? J Hoover - The thing I am concerned about, and so is Mr. Katzenbach, is having something issued so we can convince the public that Oswald is the real assassin" - What's that about huh? I am not making this up you know... it's all over the place. But I guess it's almost 60 years of whitch hunt and the US elite, bankers, military industry, Fed reserve, CIA just got lucky that day and progressively richer overtime with several hundread billions. It happens :).

  • @denyasaltz1994
    @denyasaltz1994 2 роки тому +3

    You are CORRECT. Oliver stone IS an incredible, exceptional human being.

  • @alberteinsteinlookalike
    @alberteinsteinlookalike 3 роки тому +34

    Killed in Johnson's home state, and he gets to be president??? That's all I ever had to see and hear. I was 8 years old watching it all unfold on TV, with my family. I suddenly hollered out, "That guy's gonna pull a gun", just before Ruby drew and fired. A real shocker to a kid.

    • @FD_and_B
      @FD_and_B 2 роки тому +2

      No you didn't

    • @bradhuskers
      @bradhuskers 2 роки тому +2

      The main point to understand is that today, the left wing government control party is totalitarian and incompatible with our principles of liberty and the bill of rights.

    • @FD_and_B
      @FD_and_B 2 роки тому

      @@bradhuskers lol

    • @bradhuskers
      @bradhuskers 2 роки тому +1

      @@FD_and_B
      If you've studied politics as long as I have, you'd understand exactly what I've said.
      But don't fret none.
      Millions of easily duped individuals don't understand either.
      As for Oliver Stone?
      Yes, he's a left wing nutjob extremist.
      Always has been.

    • @FD_and_B
      @FD_and_B 2 роки тому

      @@bradhuskers lmfao

  • @KerrieRedgate
    @KerrieRedgate 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you for uploading this!! I hadn’t seen this before, and I’m going to watch it again.

  • @carlpen850
    @carlpen850 6 років тому +102

    You always know how close someone is to the truth by looking at who's calling them a kook or a liar and why

    • @Raffini
      @Raffini 5 років тому

      In some cases people are just clearly insane though. I actually like cases like the assasination of JFK to never get solved. The fact that it remains a mystery gives us movies like this.

    • @Raffini
      @Raffini 5 років тому +11

      Garrison and Oliver Stone's story are very believable, I'm not denying that. But it is far from universaly recognized as the truth, which allows room for speculation. Personally I'm ok with that. That final deleted scene with Donald Sutherland sums it up perfectly when Garrison says it almost feels as if his whole story never happened and X responds with: "It never did." As long as the majority of people either don't know or don't believe that something happened, then officially it never did. Even if it actually did.

    • @Raffini
      @Raffini 5 років тому +1

      And yet you'll find millions of people who are absolutely convinced you're wrong. They'll say exactly the same thing. There's only one truth and that's theirs. That disagreement is what makes events like the JFK assasination interesting.

    • @vernpascal1531
      @vernpascal1531 5 років тому

      Uncle Tony hits it out of the park!

    • @rhunter762i
      @rhunter762i 5 років тому +9

      As an old WWII bomber pilot once said, "When you're getting heavy flak (Anti-aircraft fire--in German, 'FLugzeug Abwehr Kanon'--FLAK) you know you're over the target".

  • @benjaminsmith3151
    @benjaminsmith3151 2 роки тому +17

    The Ruby situation is interesting, because they know more now than when they made the movie. In the book "Chaos" about Charles Manson, they show that the doctor who was working with Manson was also the one who "Treated" Ruby. Possibly even the one portrayed here giving Ruby the injections.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 Рік тому

      Injecting cancer cells to cause cancer is medical nonsense.

    • @ThekidManson
      @ThekidManson Рік тому

      Louis Jolie West...a great American

  • @dr.jackkevorkian1119
    @dr.jackkevorkian1119 3 роки тому +4

    Thank you for posting this. 🙏

  • @Phantom1090
    @Phantom1090 3 роки тому +22

    I watch this film every November to commemorate the tragedy in Dallas. I'm well aware that Stone took dramatic license when creating this film. The important thing is keeping this event in the public forum and debate. Whether Oswald was the culprit or not everyone should agree Americans were not given the truth and the military industrial complex truly took over.

    • @duke4384
      @duke4384 3 роки тому +6

      Oswald worked for the CIA & was a contract agent for them, was also a FBI informant. was trained by ONI, he was a good guy, wesley Frazier who gave him a ride to work said he liked JFK & voted for him. take that to the bank !

    • @eddieschwab864
      @eddieschwab864 2 роки тому +1

      JFK, First Victim of the Deep State

    • @idiotidiot5821
      @idiotidiot5821 2 роки тому

      Well I think it worked in a way to how Area 51 supposedly works or working on nuclear or future tech...some people get some of the info but no one gets all of it except the very high up and a lot of the info is purposely false to out who may be sharing any info or expose that the project may be close to actual exposure to be shut down. I think a lot of the story here is true but a lot hasnt been found out and may not ever

    • @kxkxkxkx
      @kxkxkxkx 2 роки тому

      What a bunch of morons you are, even with all the knowledge in the world at your fingertips you still insist on your proud stupidity.
      Oswald was a KGB agent along with his wife Marina and best friend George 🇺🇸 this obvious fact was covered up to avoid WW III.
      It is also public knowledge that area 51 (Groom Lake) is the base for secret aerospace research on stuff like stealth planes. Idiots 🤦

  • @timwilliams8343
    @timwilliams8343 3 роки тому +17

    A lot of people criticize Jim Garrison for the way he handled the "Case", I thought he did an admiral Job under the circumstances...& He Did Do one thing....He stirred the "Shitstorm"

    • @crouchingcaterpillar
      @crouchingcaterpillar 2 роки тому +2

      Only one to have the guts to see a conspiracy and go after the conspirators. Clay Shaw was in the CIA.

    • @justthink5854
      @justthink5854 2 роки тому

      @xoxolol the movie had way too little of Lee Oswald, who was incredibly complex and never fired a shot that day. yes shots from all over, but the throat and throat HITS came from the south knoll close to the overpass. JFK was blown BACK and then fell/pulled by Jackie who had her right hand on his shoulder asking what was wrong as JFK struggled from the throat hit. a shot from the north or grassy knoll could not have hit JFK's head as it would have been perpendicular right to left. ua-cam.com/video/c8emNECYgmg/v-deo.html

    • @justthink5854
      @justthink5854 2 роки тому +1

      @@crouchingcaterpillar the movie had way too little of Lee Oswald, who was incredibly complex and never fired a shot that day. yes shots from all over, but the throat and throat HITS came from the south knoll close to the overpass. JFK was blown BACK and then fell/pulled by Jackie who had her right hand on his shoulder asking what was wrong as JFK struggled from the throat hit. a shot from the north or grassy knoll could not have hit JFK's head as it would have been perpendicular right to left. ua-cam.com/video/c8emNECYgmg/v-deo.html

    • @crouchingcaterpillar
      @crouchingcaterpillar 2 роки тому +1

      @@justthink5854 I agree thats about how it played out. Agree on multiple shooters but the kill shot came from the grassy knoll area. I believe (at this time) that shots were also fired from the roof of the Dal-Tex building and the TSBD. Oswald was not the shooter. They would have had to heavily edit the script to cover Oswald more thoroughly. I would have watched.

    • @justthink5854
      @justthink5854 2 роки тому

      @@crouchingcaterpillar then why all the wild shots mixed with a few world class hits? 2 groups 1 large to wound/scare for Cuba invasion. 1 small dbl cross at the south knoll to kill for Nam, LBJ, etc etc etc. he worked hand in hand with Sherry Fiester on the head hit and expanded to the throat hit over many trips from the UK. please give him a like . just put the limo in plan and JFK within it at the head hit. Z makes it seem like the limo is going straight and level because he naturally PANNED it and there's no background except for grass. a GK hit would have been perpendicular rt entry left exit with Jackie's head right behind his. the limo was pointed at the sk and overhead bridge area at the head hit.

  • @observer6294
    @observer6294 6 років тому +9

    Darned good scenes.
    Thank You.

  • @margeryfranko1850
    @margeryfranko1850 2 роки тому +2

    Thank you Cinema Garmonbozia for sharing this, totally absorbing and excellent work from the brilliant Oliver Stone. Totally fascinating. Thank you Oliver Stone. Truth Will Out

  • @comradebeandip
    @comradebeandip 6 років тому +7

    I love the sequence at 10:50 with the ring clacking against the table. Very menacing.

  • @monsieurlemarquis
    @monsieurlemarquis 4 роки тому +8

    it's such a pity these scenes are not in any cut of the movie...it would be awesome to have the whole thing on one dvd or bluray

  • @a1f1racer
    @a1f1racer 2 роки тому +6

    Mr Stone. Your a genius, your movie is way beyond exceptional. The richness is stunning. This is a man who understands not only cinema in its absolute entirity, but has a moral and ethical compass which is down right rare to explain such complex issues. A gem of a man and movie.

    • @justthink5854
      @justthink5854 2 роки тому

      the movie had way too little of Lee Oswald, who was incredibly complex and never fired a shot that day. yes shots from all over, but the throat and throat HITS came from the south knoll close to the overpass. JFK was blown BACK and then fell/pulled by Jackie who had her right hand on his shoulder asking what was wrong as JFK struggled from the throat hit. a shot from the north or grassy knoll could not have hit JFK's head as it would have been perpendicular right to left. ua-cam.com/video/c8emNECYgmg/v-deo.html

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 Рік тому

      He's a con artist.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 Рік тому

      @@justthink5854 Rubbish, and all credible evidence here in the real world points squarely at Oswald.

  • @Davemac1116
    @Davemac1116 3 роки тому +7

    Brilliant commentary by Stone. Brilliant film.

  • @digital727
    @digital727 2 роки тому +9

    I used to think it strange after listening to the recording of Ruby telling his brother there was No conspiracy just before he died in hospital, Until I heard about Ruby bing visited by the MindControl doctor in Jail. The frustrating part though was the opportunities Ruby had to tell the world on camera instead of hinting, He knew he was likely a dead man walking.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 Рік тому

      Ruby could have made any public statement he wanted during his trial. His mental condition deteriorated badly as time went by and he was claiming to hear Jews being tortured in the next cell.

  • @squatch545
    @squatch545 6 років тому +85

    That's actually Jim Garrison interrogating Ruby.

    • @TonyRomearound
      @TonyRomearound 5 років тому +1

      Joe Smith it is not Kevin Costner played Jim Garrison Brian doyle-murray played Jack Ruby

    • @19kilo241
      @19kilo241 5 років тому +22

      Anthony C the real Jim Garrison is playing Chief Justice Earl Warren who is questioning Ruby

    • @dennissettlemyre917
      @dennissettlemyre917 5 років тому +11

      It is Garrison. playing the Chief Justice with the glasses asking Ruby questions.

    • @dennisstaser4122
      @dennisstaser4122 5 років тому +8

      Dennis Settlemyre ,yes, Jim Garrison played a cameo appearance.

    • @dannypruett4976
      @dannypruett4976 5 років тому +5

      Yes it is

  • @rollerhockey69king87
    @rollerhockey69king87 3 роки тому +12

    ‘What kind of a sledgehammer the media could be in those days’ lol. Hasn’t changed Ollie. Paradigms do.

    • @jockoadams3377
      @jockoadams3377 3 роки тому +2

      This post was flagged, blocked and shadow banned by our team of "fact checkers".

  • @denyasaltz1994
    @denyasaltz1994 2 роки тому +2

    GARY OLDMAN'S ACTING IS SOOO INTUITIVE, CHANNELED. HE IS ONE OF THE GREAT ACTORS!!! A VERY EMPATHETIC METHOD ACTOR. HE IS A HARD-WORKING, FOCUSED ACTOR.

  • @rexmundi2012
    @rexmundi2012 6 років тому +7

    I love the line "he did speak in cadenced sentences; he had studied Shakespeare extensively." (10:11)

  • @sejrec56
    @sejrec56 5 років тому +16

    I love this movie JFK, and I’m sure it’s so obvious there was a conspiracy. But to see these deleted scenes adds so much more to the movie, I’d love to have the JFK movie intact w ALL the deleted scenes! Or make it myself, if I can find w/o Stones narration

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 Рік тому

      Movie is a work of lies and fiction.

    • @neiljones1938
      @neiljones1938 6 місяців тому

      DVD special version.

  • @saxogrammaticus3917
    @saxogrammaticus3917 3 роки тому +5

    Oliver stone is in the top 3 american writers/directors....ever

  • @aeafilmsuk
    @aeafilmsuk Рік тому +1

    I'm one of those young filmmakers Oliver was talking about at the end. Dedicated to telling these types of stories, by any means necessary

  • @ianbell8701
    @ianbell8701 2 роки тому +2

    The role of Earl Warren is played by Jim Garrison by the way. “JFK” was a very impactful film and eventually resulted in demand by the public for the release of “all the files”. The result was the formation of the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) which did some important work. The mainstream media gave the ARRB a wide birth. Thanks for posting. I agree with Mr. Stone…Please care.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 Рік тому

      Mr. Stone lies more than 80 times in the film.

  • @Righteous628
    @Righteous628 2 роки тому +6

    I would like Oliver Stone to do a movie about Julian Assange

  • @DangerousDavies2008
    @DangerousDavies2008 5 років тому +12

    Brian Doyle Murray did a good job of playing Ruby.

    • @neilfeinberg7825
      @neilfeinberg7825 3 роки тому

      For some reason I thought Albert Brooks looked like Ruby. He's more of a comedian.

    • @uncletony6210
      @uncletony6210 2 роки тому

      you mean Gus?

    • @michaelwoodward9894
      @michaelwoodward9894 2 роки тому

      I think the conversation Jack Ruby had with the Warren commission would have been buried anyway,for if it were not for Mr. Stone we would not have known about this

  • @dr.jackkevorkian1119
    @dr.jackkevorkian1119 3 роки тому +2

    This film made me an Oliver Stone fan @ 10 years old.
    This has been 1 of my very favorite movies ever since and I thank my mother for letting watch this film and come to my own conclusions & ask my own questions.
    I do appreciate it.
    I may have been a little young for it but @ least I’ve been aware because of it.

    • @fiveofever2971
      @fiveofever2971 3 роки тому +1

      It's a great movie but plays fast and loose with the facts

  • @5bags
    @5bags 3 місяці тому +1

    Oliver Stone is an American hero and absolute treasure of a human being ♥

  • @williamlarson3623
    @williamlarson3623 5 років тому +18

    Thank you for posting this. I continue to admire Stone, including his work here, and more importantly in what he has done advancing our knowledge of the JFK assassination. However, have just finished watching a youtube clip denouncing the work of Oliver Stone, Moore and others as disinformation, or at best as revisionist history, particularly Stone's movie on the JFK assassination. Although I argued in Stone's defense, stating his movie "JFK" had lead to the creation of ARRB, therefore the release of many more important documents on the JFK murder, including extensive information on the Zapruder film, it's handling and copying thereof. However I regret I hadn't suggested the following: if we cannot believe in the whistleblowers of today (Moore, Manning, Assange, Snowden, et al, including Stone himself) just in whom DO WE BELIEVE when it comes to matters such as this?
    Certainly not those discredited news organizations of yesterday, or even of today, such as CNN and their kind, or for that matter any of our 'unelected' public officials, those who would give counsel, even dictate to our national leaders on public policy, yet continue to remain at distance to the public at large. We know such individuals and organizations exist since we have some of their names and deeds from reliable sources (at least from those I believe in). Yet no one of Stone's stature has ever taken these entities on (following release of 'JFK'), while later seemingly agreeing with the 'official' version of what happened on 9/11 (notwithstanding the A&E research and/or evidence of the building 7 collapse?) Moore in his 'Fahrenheit 911', and those from 'Loose Change' have done an admirable job revealing some of these collective groups or 'characters,' certainly those more closely involved leading to the 9/11 event. As once said, all roads lead to Rome.

    • @fobrien1
      @fobrien1 5 років тому +4

      "Thank you for posting this. I continue to admire Stone, including his
      work here, and more importantly in what he has done advancing our
      knowledge of the JFK assassination. However, have just finished
      watching a youtube clip denouncing the work of Oliver Stone, Moore and
      others as disinformation, or at best as revisionist history,
      particularly Stone's movie on the JFK assassination. Although I argued
      in Stone's defense, stating his movie "JFK" had lead to the creation of
      ARRB, therefore the release of many more important documents on the JFK
      murder, including extensive information on the Zapruder film, it's
      handling and copying thereof. However I regret I hadn't suggested the
      following: if we cannot believe in the whistleblowers of today (Moore,
      Manning, Assange, Snowden, et al, including Stone himself) just in whom
      DO WE BELIEVE when it comes to matters such as this?
      Certainly not those discredited news organizations of yesterday, or even
      of today, such as CNN and their kind"
      excellent comment . whistle blowers end up attacked , the media used to falsely discredit them , and or they are locked up . to those who lie the TRUTH is deadly and must be stopped .

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 Рік тому +1

      Do you admire a guy who slanders a lot of innocent people as being accessories to murder and treason while he cashes in on a movie packed with more than 80 demonstrable lies?

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 Рік тому +1

      @@fobrien1 "Denouncing his work..." The movie is packed with more than 80 demonstrable lies...

    • @fobrien1
      @fobrien1 Рік тому

      @@aaronz7056 as you brought it up .
      please demonstrate that stone KNOWINGLY AND INTENTIONALLY LIED AND TRIED TO DECEIVE PEOPLE .
      please list the names of those you say stone slandered and named as accessories to murder , and of course provide the proof you have that you based your above claim on .
      i shall look forward to reading your reply and seeing all the proof you provide .

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 Рік тому +1

      @@fobrien1 Stone: portrays police officers as descending on theater to arrest a man for not paying admission, and beating up unarmed man inside, obviously implying they are part of frame up, cover up.
      Truth: the man - Oswald - was a good match to the suspect just seen shooting a police officer nearby. Oswald tried to shoot the first officer to approach him and immediately started fighting so violently 3 officers were injured just disarming him. Those officers risked their lives to capture their suspect alive, but Stone doesn't care who he suggests was part of some plot so long as it suits him.
      Stone: fake epileptic has seizure in plaza, disappears, as a distraction.
      Truth: Jerry Belknap went to Parkland Hospital after suffering real seizure.
      Stone: strongly implies 3 tramps were assassins, fake-arrested and disappearing.
      Truth: the 3 were real tramps, their arrest records exist to this day, they were ID'd and cleared, released with no evidence against them.
      Stone: 3 cartridges found neatly side by side in Sniper Nest.
      Truth: police found the shells scattered: Stone is clearly implying police were lying and part of a cover-up in murder and treason.
      Stone: Justice Department had "done nothing" with regard to HSCA conclusions on "probable conspiracy," thus aiding cover-up in murder and treason.
      Truth: JD took action by having Ramsey Panel in investigate the one piece of evidence used by HSCA to declare "probable conspiracy," the dictabelt recording, and they discovered it was invalid.
      Stone: Lyndon Johnson orders limo "filled with bullet holes" refurbished to cover up evidence of multiple shooters.
      Truth: only bullet strikes were to windshield and chrome topping, which are still in the National Archives.
      Stone: guilt-ridden David Ferrie has remorse about his role in murder and treason, starts co-operating with Garrison, is rubbed out.
      Truth: Ferrie died of Berry aneurysm after declining health, always hotly denied any knowledge of the assassination, and was preparing to sue Garrison for harassing him.
      Stone: Dallas Mayor Cabell changes parade route, making it easier for assassins to kill JFK.
      Truth: Parade route was never changed.
      There's plenty more, but it's gettin' late.

  • @douglasmcintyre3297
    @douglasmcintyre3297 5 років тому +52

    While I enjoyed this video I would have rather had Oliver Stone introduce them and then let us see the scenes in their entirety.

    • @Dion1957
      @Dion1957 4 роки тому

      DITTO

    • @patr70
      @patr70 3 роки тому +7

      They have that option on the DVD to play the deleted scenes with OR without the director commentary. This was uploaded w/ the commentary.

    • @Anthony-ws2ve
      @Anthony-ws2ve 3 роки тому +1

      It's all in the Director's cut !

  • @paulustarsus
    @paulustarsus 2 роки тому

    Absorbing upload. Well done 👏👏👏👏🇮🇪

  • @johnmacgregor324
    @johnmacgregor324 Місяць тому

    Eye-opening, thanks.

  • @Raykibb1
    @Raykibb1 4 роки тому +18

    I love the fact that Oliver Stone used big Jim Garrison to play Earl kWarren. I grew up with Garrison’s kids, and that was awesome of Stone to cast Garrison. I hate to say it, but Garrison was closer to the truth than anyone else. I would suggest his book, “On The Trail of Assassins.” I actually knew Numa Bertel, he was the head of the Indigent Defender’s Office when I was an Asst. DA.

    • @kathleenpapaleo8891
      @kathleenpapaleo8891 4 роки тому +2

      Raykibb Heard Garrison speak at my college. He really was spot on.

    • @MicheleMJJ
      @MicheleMJJ 4 роки тому +4

      @@kathleenpapaleo8891 He was a super intelligent man. I was always afraid someone would have him killed.

    • @Raykibb1
      @Raykibb1 4 роки тому

      LiveOkie: There is a certain conspiracy theory stigma which I have found exists, especially amongst New Orleanians. I am an attorney, so I deal in facts; but personally you got me, because I am proud to know the family. ‘Dr. Mary’s Monkey’ is another more extreme conspiratorial work. I’d give it a read if you have not. It follows David Ferrie and his cancer treatment experiments. It contains much about the hard right which existed in New Orleans in the early ‘60s. Best of health!!

    • @randyharris3175
      @randyharris3175 4 роки тому +1

      Garrison was a pure fraud

    • @randyharris3175
      @randyharris3175 4 роки тому +1

      @@kathleenpapaleo8891 spot on my ass he was dead wrong

  • @joerasmussen4029
    @joerasmussen4029 5 років тому +12

    Watch 1:45 and that is the chief justice Warren as played by none other than the real Jim Garrison. Yep, that is true, Kevin Costner played Jim Garrison and the real Jim Garrison played Warren.

  • @clayformations1638
    @clayformations1638 2 роки тому +1

    I'm watching this today in 2021... all of these scenes is called precursor to today. This is when it all started.

  • @frankmaitland2569
    @frankmaitland2569 3 роки тому +6

    No Bullet in the History of Bullets acted like "The Magic Bullet"

    • @fiveofever2971
      @fiveofever2971 3 роки тому

      well give us an alternative to all the wounds of JFK and Gov Connally

    • @JamesT094
      @JamesT094 3 роки тому +2

      @@fiveofever2971 multiple shooters, CIA bot

    • @fiveofever2971
      @fiveofever2971 3 роки тому

      @@JamesT094 prove it Einstein

    • @TheyAreHere2
      @TheyAreHere2 3 роки тому +2

      @@fiveofever2971 Show me the car and I'll prove it. Show me Kennedy's brain and I'll prove it. Show me the back of his head and I'll prove it.
      Oh wait. You can't show me any of that, because they were all destroyed and tampered with immediately after the murder. Very interesting.

    • @fiveofever2971
      @fiveofever2971 3 роки тому

      @@TheyAreHere2 I was addressing the others but since you’d like to play hero then provide an alternative to the single bullet fact. like an requested then we can proceed.

  • @napoliansolo7865
    @napoliansolo7865 3 роки тому +9

    The reason that Oswald had to be silenced is because F. Lee Baily was on a plane to Dallas to represent Oswald in court. There was no reason to "transfer" Oswald other than to give Ruby an opportunity to shoot him.

    • @jamespuckett5547
      @jamespuckett5547 3 роки тому +1

      Sure because Operative Ruby first had to stand patiently in line and send a $25 Western Union money order to one of his Operative strippers before he could be bothered with this mission.
      The recipient of the Western Union wire transfer was a stripper named Karen Bennett. 19 years old, pregnant, and married to an out-of-work salesman. Operative Ruby did amazing work sending her 25 dollars and then putting a well-deserved bullet in Oswald’s gut...all within a few minutes.
      Showing up to the garage after Oswald was actually scheduled to be transferred, and leaving his favorite dog locked in his car. Yeah, this was a planned event LMAO!.

    • @johnrengifo2452
      @johnrengifo2452 3 роки тому +2

      Haven’t heard about that one. And who sent Ruby?

    • @justthink5854
      @justthink5854 2 роки тому

      @xoxolol he's just a troll. the movie had way too little of Lee Oswald, who was incredibly complex and never fired a shot that day. yes shots from all over, but the throat and throat HITS came from the south knoll close to the overpass. JFK was blown BACK and then fell/pulled by Jackie who had her right hand on his shoulder asking what was wrong as JFK struggled from the throat hit. a shot from the north or grassy knoll could not have hit JFK's head as it would have been perpendicular right to left. ua-cam.com/video/c8emNECYgmg/v-deo.html

    • @bob80q
      @bob80q 2 роки тому

      @xoxolol and you are just another conspiracy nutjob who probably spends most of his time watching Hee Haw reruns

    • @bob80q
      @bob80q 2 роки тому

      @@justthink5854 yeah you keyboard kommandos know it all

  • @kennethrussell1158
    @kennethrussell1158 4 роки тому +19

    Oliver Stone is a legend/genius in my opinion. He's been known to be very hard on actors. But that's because he's a perfectionist.

  • @admtech69
    @admtech69 10 місяців тому +1

    Newman! He was in on it all along...he knew about the grassy knoll and the second spitter!

  • @josephinewhite6224
    @josephinewhite6224 19 днів тому

    I always thought Ruby could have said his testimony right then and there while TV cameras were rolling instead of wanting to go to DC to do it. That made it imperative to see that he ever got there.

  • @user-mh9cm6ii7y
    @user-mh9cm6ii7y 3 роки тому +3

    когда посмотрю данный фильм - обязательно гляну эти кадры! спасибо!)

  • @yeetskeet7234
    @yeetskeet7234 2 роки тому +23

    Imagine the look on Hoda's face when it gets revealed that Jenna's grand Papi helped murder a president 😳😃😃

    • @bob80q
      @bob80q 2 роки тому

      thats total bullshit

    • @yuothineyesasian
      @yuothineyesasian 2 роки тому +1

      @@bob80q Have you ever looked into it?

    • @bob80q
      @bob80q 2 роки тому

      @Maryann MacDonald and you know this.....how? Feel free to provide any VERIFIABLE evidence.

    • @hammerthor6441
      @hammerthor6441 2 роки тому

      He was part of the plot. GHWB....

    • @yeetskeet7234
      @yeetskeet7234 2 роки тому

      @@bob80q Bob, watch the documentary Dark Legacy. Zapata Oil (owned by Bush and Bill Liedtke) was a CIA forward operating position. "Papi" told congress that he "never had dealings with the CIA before becoming it's director"(BULLSHIT). It wasn't an accident that Dulles was on the Warren commission immediately after JFK fired him and started the defunding of the CIA. IT'S SOFA KING OBVIOUS a child could see it.

  • @johnoleary9317
    @johnoleary9317 4 роки тому +1

    Such an awe enspiring speech in court.
    At the end of which kostner s eyes look to the moving camera instead of the jury.
    And says
    Its up to you.
    Perfect director.
    Perfect cast

  • @identification133
    @identification133 6 років тому +51

    I do love this movie and have lost count of the number of times I have watched it. Thank you for this commentary, this in itself was like how it all happened. I think often of how to counter the term "theorist" but without theorizing at first, there is no conjecturing. What do we call those who sit around at that table in the Pentagon and start an idea like this and then deny as if nothing happened. They must know that they have bitten more than they can chew sometimes and this is one of those times. How can we leave this alone?

    • @frankfacts6207
      @frankfacts6207 6 років тому +1

      Naseem Khan we call u.s. generals and admirals gangsters

    • @dallasbrubaker6054
      @dallasbrubaker6054 6 років тому +3

      Best movie I ever saw.

    • @ckom0007
      @ckom0007 6 років тому +5

      You do understand the movie is fiction, not a documentary, don't you? The number of times Stone used "poetic license" or outright lied virtually classifies the film as propaganda--and Stone makes no apologies for that. He criticises Garrison's opponents for not being objective while his entire film is most certainly NOT objective!
      Still, it's a very well done film and certainly demonstrates the power of a well-crafted film.

    • @adamredfield
      @adamredfield 6 років тому +2

      ckom0007, thank you for pointing this out. That it should have to be pointed out at all, though, is very sad. As someone once observed, the only thing Stone got right was the date of the assassination, 11/22/63. The only thing I can say in Stone's favor is that he casts well. The acting, especially in the small roles, is very good.

    • @pinehawk9600
      @pinehawk9600 6 років тому +1

      Naseem Khan even Stone himself said its 90% fiction. Are you ok in the head?

  • @kennethrussell1158
    @kennethrussell1158 4 роки тому +26

    I'm not sure how historically accurate this movie is. But it's one of the best movies ever made. In my opinion.

    • @Wobbothe3rd
      @Wobbothe3rd 4 роки тому +1

      It's about as accurate as you could reasonably expect. Current research could make an even better film today.

    • @nicknewman7848
      @nicknewman7848 4 роки тому +3

      There are issues.. in the movie they say that Oswald was not a good shot.. in his marine records it says he was above average. They also insinuate that Johnson was involved.. that's a bit of a stretch. I prefer to look at the sentiment and the imagination that turned me on to researching the information about the assassination. It's an obvious conspiracy.. anyone who says otherwise believes that a crappy italian rifle with basic ammo can blow someone's head off from that distance. Not a chance. Lone gunman theorists are insane.. half the people there saw shots from behind the fence. The film is great though.. performances, direction, editing, music etc

    • @midnightmover2329
      @midnightmover2329 4 роки тому +4

      It’s absolute bullshit

    • @gregoryklein3311
      @gregoryklein3311 4 роки тому +1

      ANDY T, so is the alphabet soup guys in the government.

    • @midnightmover2329
      @midnightmover2329 4 роки тому

      LiveOkie Wanker

  • @timfronimos459
    @timfronimos459 6 років тому +3

    Sanna, Ruby is played by Brian Doyle Murray.

  • @monsieurlemarquis
    @monsieurlemarquis 4 роки тому

    is there any way to see these deleted scenes & extended parts without Stone's commentary? i find very interesting what he says, but i really would love to see and hear the scenes in their entirety...

  • @tobasco_jones6160
    @tobasco_jones6160 3 роки тому

    Is there a cut of the film with these deleted scenes reinserted

  • @ajmalsarwar2939
    @ajmalsarwar2939 4 роки тому +5

    This was one of my favourite films growing up but back then my library never had any books on JFK which were concerned with the truth and Internet was in its infancy then.

  • @helpinghal
    @helpinghal 4 роки тому +7

    I was half-asleep watching Kevin Costner 's famous summation on HBO when I heard a loud knock on the door. I thought it was the CIA coming to get me. Turned out the Dominos Pizza guy had the wrong house.

  • @justinfindlay6858
    @justinfindlay6858 5 років тому

    Such a smooth talker films amazing

  • @dr.jackkevorkian1119
    @dr.jackkevorkian1119 3 роки тому +7

    Exactly..... how’d they know??
    Because they orchestrated the whole thing.

  • @kevinkavanaugh9845
    @kevinkavanaugh9845 2 роки тому +10

    I would love to see Oliver Stone do a movie about Covid.

  • @michaelwilks6268
    @michaelwilks6268 3 роки тому +3

    The statement that Ruby made regarding his possible elimination and that another form of government would

  • @johnheigis83
    @johnheigis83 5 років тому +1

    Sir. You've overlooked the "civil-defense" connection.

  • @jonathanpence9067
    @jonathanpence9067 2 роки тому +1

    When I first saw this, I recognized Wayne Knight from Seinfeld, and I thought they kept calling him "Newman". The character in the film's name is apparently "Numa". Lol 😂.

  • @franklinkuhn482
    @franklinkuhn482 3 роки тому +6

    Jim Garrison has been vindicated....Mr . Garrison was a true patriot....JFK...MLK...RFK ....Malcom X.... you will never be forgotten ....RIP

  • @eamonngaynor5762
    @eamonngaynor5762 3 роки тому +10

    If anybody could've told the truth about 22 November it was ruby however the the Warren commission had other ideas if you recall ruby looking into the camera saying the world will never know truth he was telling the future generations and this resonates today

    • @Pfsif
      @Pfsif 2 роки тому

      Grand Conspiracies are segmented, Ruby was a small part who could have only shed light on who ordered him to shoot (not kill) Oswald. A single shot to the gut? O died by doctor or spook.

  • @stevefleming356
    @stevefleming356 2 роки тому

    Is a new extended cut coming out ?

  • @alfonsosoto7265
    @alfonsosoto7265 4 роки тому

    Por favor quisiera que puedan compartirme la película completa JFK...... Gracias

  • @jayrollins4111
    @jayrollins4111 4 роки тому +7

    "He said he was injected with cancer cells" -- he also screamed that he could hear millions of jews being tortured in the cell next to him. he was not a well man.

    • @shanet5604
      @shanet5604 4 роки тому +1

      Jay Rollins Well pointed out ! Some people watch that movie and believe it as the truth !! He was as insane as Oswald !!

    • @MegaMacReal
      @MegaMacReal 4 роки тому

      What medical professional treated him right before that Jews incident? Read the new _Chaos_ Tom O'Neill book.

    • @shanet5604
      @shanet5604 4 роки тому +1

      Mega Mac He had nothing to do with CIA,the mafia or anybody of any importance !! He was a hothead like Oswald ! If he was sent to kill him don’t you think he’d have shot him in the head ?? It was an impulse shooting,he didn’t even expect him to die !

    • @fourleafclover2885
      @fourleafclover2885 2 роки тому

      That’s because of the lsd they were pumping him with. That doesn’t mean he was wrong about the cancer injection. They certainly used that as a method to get rid of other people.

  • @druz7375
    @druz7375 6 років тому +6

    At 18:43, look who the camera passes by when they try to arrest Oswald. Jack Ruby's character...Chilling... I was like WTF!

    • @2cardarsenal310
      @2cardarsenal310 4 роки тому +1

      I saw it as well, nice catch! I think it was done to insinuate that Oswald was to meet Ruby there after the shooting. I speculate that Jack Ruby was suppose to shoot Oswald there and end it but the police showed up foiling that plan. Then Ruby, because he failed to execute the plan HAD to show up at the police station where he used his influence with friends at police department to get in, shoot Oswald and take the fall.

  • @denyasaltz1994
    @denyasaltz1994 2 роки тому

    And there are NO WORDS TO THE FANTABULOUS UNDERRATED ACTING SKILLS OF GARY OLDMAN. I THINK HE IS ONE OF THE GREATEST ACTORS, EVER.
    I THINK HE IS A BETTER ACTOR THAN
    THE SPOKEN, NOTED ACTORS OF OUR DAY

  • @priyadarshinirouth4102
    @priyadarshinirouth4102 6 років тому +2

    Where can I get these scenes without the commentary, so that I can actually hear what the actors are saying?

    • @cinemagarmonbozia808
      @cinemagarmonbozia808  6 років тому +4

      Director's Cut special edition DVD. I guess it's also on Director's Cut blu ray.

  • @jeffcummins1408
    @jeffcummins1408 5 років тому +4

    Love the movie, and this is great stuff, but it's difficult to hear much of the dialogue here because Oliver Stone talks over it.

  • @kathleenpapaleo8891
    @kathleenpapaleo8891 4 роки тому +3

    Watch the movie "Ruby". Lot's of clues.

  • @randomhuman19
    @randomhuman19 3 роки тому

    Oswalds Ghost is best doc Ive seen on subject. Makes JFK look like a comic book.

    • @SKa-tt9nm
      @SKa-tt9nm 3 роки тому +1

      JFK wasn’t a documentary. Did you not know that?

  • @DW-nb2zc
    @DW-nb2zc 2 роки тому

    Good stuff.Why delete?

  • @smallies7154
    @smallies7154 5 років тому +7

    why is dorothy kilgallens murder not mentioned? she was speaking to ruby and she got clipped

    • @stddisclaimer8020
      @stddisclaimer8020 3 роки тому

      @ferg: Kilgallen was not murdered. She died of a fatal barbiturate/alcohol interaction. Foul play was not suspected, but continually "imagined" by the Cuckoo Conspiracy Community.

    • @chrisjohnson4165
      @chrisjohnson4165 3 роки тому +3

      @@stddisclaimer8020 You are so dim. This was a few days after she told a friend "I'm going to blow the whole thing open!". I suppose after she killed herself, she stole all her notes.

    • @sueprator9314
      @sueprator9314 2 роки тому

      @@stddisclaimer8020 Why are you so quick to claim to know it was not murder??? BTW what kind of weird name do you have?

    • @stddisclaimer8020
      @stddisclaimer8020 2 роки тому

      @@sueprator9314 Fifty-six years later is not "quick," and it's not a "claim."
      Kilgallen was not murdered. She died of a fatal barbiturate/alcohol interaction. There was no evidence of a break-in, violence, or of foul play. Why are you "so quick to claim" an alternate narrative that goes against all the established facts?

  • @eastghost8443
    @eastghost8443 5 років тому +5

    Oliver Stone's movie allowed Dealey Plaza to be repaved, in the process the storm drain at the base of the stairs ascending the grassy knoll was shrunken. Previously, it was possible for a rifle-armed man to crouch inside the storm drain and take perfect aim at the exact position where JFK received his "back and to the left" fatal headshot. Later reports to Dallas Police of a "man walking with a rifle along the Trinity River" were probably related, as the storm drain empties directly into a large culvert feeding the river. The fatal shooter was actually in front of the limo, below street level, and in perfect cover. Dr Jim Fetzer's 2003 JFK SYMPOSIUM featured a guest from Australia who presented in 22 parts a decades-spanning amalgamation and comparison of photos of Dealey Plaza. (By the way: LBJ was on the design committee of Dealey Plaza in 1933.) Everything about Dealey Plaza has been tinkered with over the decades: monuments added and movements, repavings, moving of shrubbery, moving of light poles, etc. In fact, many light poles have present-day RF devices, presumably that can scan RFID cards in the pockets of passersby, and/or record and relay audio conversations. Dealey Plaza is a very strange and dangerous place.

    • @jgm7355
      @jgm7355 5 років тому +1

      Your brain is in the sewer.

    • @christendomdefenderbeready3251
      @christendomdefenderbeready3251 5 років тому +1

      This history of Dealey Plaza is here for you to understand copycateffect.blogspot.com/2013/11/Mason33.html
      www.masonicinfo.com/kennedy.htm
      Always use a torch 🔦 down a rabbit hole you will see further ! DEEP STATE is all about numbers and sacrifice . Nazi(occult) > CIA > Bush > Clinton's ... Everything is related .

    • @randyharris3175
      @randyharris3175 3 роки тому

      Bullshit

  • @charlesking7948
    @charlesking7948 3 роки тому +2

    Oswald was in the movie theater to meet his contact, its possible that his handler was there, then the police arrived, the reason why Oswald was screaming ""i am not resisting arrest " ,to tell everyone there that the police, if they gunned him down, he was murdered by the Dallas police officers..

    • @youngbreezy2571
      @youngbreezy2571 3 роки тому

      The.why did he reach for his gun, yell out “this is it!” and then attempt to shot a cop?

    • @justthink5854
      @justthink5854 2 роки тому

      @@youngbreezy2571 he didn't. the movie had way too little of Lee Oswald, who was incredibly complex and never fired a shot that day. yes shots from all over, but the throat and throat HITS came from the south knoll close to the overpass. JFK was blown BACK and then fell/pulled by Jackie who had her right hand on his shoulder asking what was wrong as JFK struggled from the throat hit. a shot from the north or grassy knoll could not have hit JFK's head as it would have been perpendicular right to left. ua-cam.com/video/c8emNECYgmg/v-deo.html .

  • @narancauk
    @narancauk 2 роки тому

    Beautiful !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Oliver! You should make JFK DIRECTORS CUT !Like Blade Runner.

    • @narancauk
      @narancauk 2 роки тому

      PleasePlease Please

  • @Darrin.Crawford
    @Darrin.Crawford 5 років тому +3

    @4:46 - Helloooo Newman!!!!

  • @healthylifestylechanges7436
    @healthylifestylechanges7436 5 років тому +7

    Jim Garrison is a 100% hero

  • @crimony3054
    @crimony3054 5 років тому +2

    My dad laughed because Garrison said no daughter of his was ever going to win a beauty contest. So my mom called Mrs. Garrison and told her to raise hell about Jim saying bad words about his own daughter's looks. She did.

  • @knabein
    @knabein 3 роки тому +1

    I'd like edit these scenes onto the directors cut.

  • @Top500songs
    @Top500songs 5 років тому +11

    @Big Sky Blue The photo of Oswald is fake, he said it and also you have to look at the shadows behind him and where the shadow falls from his nose, they don't match. Their was a tree in the way to have made the 1st shot impossible and also the street light had a dent from a bullet, which of coarse was removed. Mr. X was a man named L Fletcher Prouty, he worked for General Edward Landsdale who sent Mr. X to Antarctica, he would of been the guy who gave JFK the security that was insufficient on that fateful day. LBJ did reverse JFK's Vietnam policy on Nov. 25, 1963, the movie never said before only that LBJ agreed with the Generals. Oswald supposedly shot at General Walker a right wing guy from Dallas, why did he miss a stationary target and supposedly shot a moving target and only missed once ?

    • @klrdotorg7135
      @klrdotorg7135 5 років тому +1

      Tom D
      The photos of Oswald with his rifle have been verified by photography experts. His wife took the photos and told authorities that. They were taken with Oswald's camera, and had his writing on the back. They were verified as authentic during each and every investigation done regarding the assassination.

    • @Top500songs
      @Top500songs 5 років тому +5

      @@klrdotorg7135 There lying, it don't take a rocket scientist man, I could tell it's fake and so can many other researchers, you go ahead and believe the lies, by now the shit's up to your neck ! The shadows don't line up, Oswald's Wife was told what to say, he took one look at it and said, "That's my head but not my body, it's superimposed !

    • @klrdotorg7135
      @klrdotorg7135 5 років тому +1

      @@Top500songs Regarding what you said about the photos ... horse shit, Tom. But like you also said, believe what you want to believe. Claiming the actual evidence is made up, is the height of convenience to your fantasy.

    • @geoffreyjohnstone5465
      @geoffreyjohnstone5465 5 років тому +2

      @Tom D
      Edward Landsdale was in Dealey Plaza and can be seen walking past the "3 tramps". Coincidence?

    • @geoffreyjohnstone5465
      @geoffreyjohnstone5465 5 років тому +3

      @@klrdotorg7135 The Scotland Yard photographic expert said they are fakes as did his Canadian counterpart. Numerous other experts have also declared them fakes. Even Marina Oswald now states they are not the photos she took and when she did take photos she was stood near the steps to Oswalds right. Its not for anyone other than a jury to declare whether they are fakes or not but in the midst of 75 law enforcement officers a known violent night club owner with a history of carrying concealed weapons waltzed in and shot their suspect. Ruby's excuse for doing this? He wanted to save Jackie Kennedy having to come to Dallas for a trial. He had such a high opinion of the Kennedys that he supposedly sat in the press office whilst the motorcade with the President and the aforementioned Jackie Kennedy rolled by 25 yards away.

  • @irgski
    @irgski 3 роки тому +4

    Ruby said he would never tell “the truth”.

    • @stddisclaimer8020
      @stddisclaimer8020 3 роки тому

      @irgski: Ruby said publicly, as well as privately to his brother and to his rabbi, that he was not part of nor did he know anything about any conspiracy. He never wavered on that.

    • @Anthony-ws2ve
      @Anthony-ws2ve 3 роки тому +1

      @@stddisclaimer8020 It's a lie, he said he wanted protection & be sent to Washington & he would of told what he knew !

    • @stddisclaimer8020
      @stddisclaimer8020 3 роки тому

      @@Anthony-ws2ve Ruby was a blabbermouth and a self-promoting attention-seeker. Fact is, he went to his grave denying being part of or knowing anything about any "conspiracy."

    • @duke4384
      @duke4384 3 роки тому

      @@stddisclaimer8020 He was a hot headed JEW, so what, when he was talking to Earl Warren, he asked to be taken to Washington because he felt his life was in danger, "Were Not Police Officers Mr. Ruby" it's all disinformation Man as simple as that, quit being so naive.

    • @stddisclaimer8020
      @stddisclaimer8020 3 роки тому

      @@duke4384 Quit being so naive as to think your characterization of Jack Ruby (or your presumed knowledge of what he thought) reveals he was part of a conspiracy, when in reality, there is absolutely no proof of that. What you believe is evidence, would never make past the front steps of a courthouse in Yokel Falls, SC.

  • @jaypoole8056
    @jaypoole8056 2 роки тому

    In case it hasn't already been mentioned the bespectacled man to whom actor Brian Doyle Murray (Jack Ruby) is the real-life Jim Garrison who Kevin Costner is portraying.

  • @denyasaltz1994
    @denyasaltz1994 2 роки тому

    Michael Rookery(judas) was the traitor in JFK. He was in the movie Mississippi Burning, he was clan in the movie; another great portrayal of a character by michael rooker.

  • @sjs928
    @sjs928 3 роки тому +12

    The REAL OWNERS of this country ( and the world) will always remain nameless , faceless , purveyors of evil.

    • @michaelwoodward9894
      @michaelwoodward9894 2 роки тому

      Listen to JFK's speech in April of 1961, about the forces against which we face

  • @barbarafield6234
    @barbarafield6234 2 роки тому +3

    Some day, the truth will come out.

  • @WimGrundy
    @WimGrundy 5 років тому

    October 11, 1963 Memo #263. Treason? None dare call it treason.

  • @cedarabbey
    @cedarabbey Рік тому

    The Colorado businessman is my favorite of the deleted scenes. Where to place it to avoid redundance (even in the director's cut) may have been the problem.