SUPREME COURT OF INDIA dismisses challenge to 70% LLB Marks requirement for MP civil Judge Exam
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 жов 2024
- The Supreme Court today (July 26) refused to entertain a petition challenging the eligibility requirement of 70% marks in LLB to appear for entry-level posts in the Madhya Pradesh Judicial Services. The Court opined that such an eligibility rule ensures that better people join the judiciary. Senior Advocate Santosh Paul appearing for petitioners flagged the concern of subjective marking across...
The Supreme Court (today, April 26) declined to interfere with the Madhya Pradesh High Court's order upholding the rule that stipulated eligibility of at least three years of practice or 70 percent marks in law graduation for entry-level judicial service candidates in the State.
Supreme Court Upholds Eligibility Rules for MP Judicial Service
The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed petitions challenging the rules prescribing an eligibility of at least three years practice or 70 per cent marks in law graduation for entry-level judicial service candidates in Madhya Pradesh. [Garima Khare v. High Court of Madhya Pradesh and anr]
A Bench of Justices Hrishikesh Roy and Prashant Kumar Mishra upheld a judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in this regard.
Justice Roy Highlights Importance of Experience in Judicial Service Eligibility
"We are not going to entertain this. It took some years of learning and experience, which is why these rules were framed. This is to ensure better judicial candidates. Their (fresh law graduates) future is not doomed," Justice Roy remarked during the course of the hearing.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court had on April 1 upheld the rule in question, leading to the instant appeal before the apex court.
LAW CLASSES, AIBE
I bet 90% of the sitting judges of DC, HC or even the SC, they themselves don't have 70% in their llb course! Hon'ble Mr. CJI D. Y. Chandrachud says its to bring good people in the judiciary.. Isn't the whole purpose of the various judicial entrance exams just that? If you are not satisfied with the quality of judges.. make the entrance exam more difficult or make changes to the training of selected judges.. By allowing the 70% mark, the SC is ultimately supporting the rattafication!!
this is for exemption of 3 years practice or 70% marks in LLB but not both sir, if you have 3 years practice then this 70% not applicable
Correct. 50% marks enough for appearing tests
@@SuccessLawClasses doesn't matter! Students from NLU, DU can't wait for 3 years after llb degree!
There are many third class law clgs/Universities in india which can award you as much as you want with a minimal consideration. You dont even need to attend classes
With the decision of 70%, the demand for these universities is fit to increase, people will take admission and leave for delhi in some big judiciary coaching.
They'll prepare for judiciary and will have their attendance fixed at home.
With this decision only the students of tier 1, 2 colleges are going to get affected. Its extremely tough to score beyond 70 in most of these tier 1-2 universities.
Absolutely!!!
It must be asked % of these judges
Every law student from DU crying in the corner.
I got du clc this year...now i am regretting my decision to join clg😢
@@Aesthetic_fighter I ALSO GOT CLC BRO
@@Aesthetic_fighter😂 lol, worst decision ever.
@@Sagarvatsal5702 should i withdraw admission?🤣
@@harshitdwivedi7006 section allotment ka koi mail aaya?
I scored 61 percent in govtcollege ...... I wrote exam litereally sections and case laws as it is ...still i got 61 percent....while private colege nearby .....students do not even attend classes and never studied and scores 75 percent 😢😢😢
In Delhi University they hardly give 70% marks to anyone. The majority gets below 50-60% no matter how good an answer they write in 3hrs. These third tier law college students show 80% marks like a joke and it haunts us top tier DU students when it comes to competition minimum requirements.
correct
Exactly
So true
Exactly, every govt. University give 50-60% only...
I am from KSLU trust me. Marks is a dream for us
Excellent Council arguments difference between the institutions Given the Mark.
A great argument must needed
The argument that 70 percent criteria ensures the quality of candidates makes no sense. Doesn't qualifying 2 exams and a interview itself ensures the quality? How many senior advocates or Judges of high courts have 70 percent marks in their graduation? Graduation marks are so subjective, it makes no sense to equate it with quality of candidates. In college exams mugging ability and filling pages matter more than actual knowledge. If the percentage criteria is that important then atleast develop an objective and scientific framework for evaluation of papers and not leave it to the whims of universities.
Subtly correct
This is strange. I am a doctor and in mbbs we in government college never give marks above 70 percent no matter how good the student. If a students gets 70 percent he is gold medalist and private colleges give marks excess of 80 peecent. This can be applied to only those exams in which simular conditions are present for all examinees
Plz sabhi judges ki llb ki percentage bhi koi publish kre, uncle judge quality maintain kr rhe h, garib family k log ab civil judge b n ban sken. Howerd se pdhe log hi judge bne is judgement se mera dissent h
Sir kindly make uniform recruitment rules for judicial employments. some states putting 55% 60% marks in LLB. This should be rectified
Any law education will not save justice in this country common people cannot get justice in this country money money money
Percent of marks indicates knowledge of the candidate on the date of examination which may be improved later. You can test knowledge of the candidates before appointing as judges. A second class graduate may succeed in IAS while a topper in graduation may not be able to make it to that.
Mera to kaise ghich ghach ke 71 pahucha😅, lekin ye faisla arbitrary ha,
Aise m upsc ke lia bhi 90% krna chahiye graduation m
I don't know what is the Logic behind such absurd rule and why SC has dismissed such application without application of Mind..
There will be four stages for the creaking judiciary examination that are as follows
1. Obtaining 70 percent marks (in not similar circumstances)
2. prelims
3. Mains
4. Interview
All of you know that -
Every person is treated equally in the same circumstances in the eyes of law, this is called equity before law.
But there are no similar circumstances in obtaining 70 percent marks at all.
So this principle can't be applied here.
Sir are their any exceptions to article 14 or is it absolute?
Students are now days being treated like football every one is playing 😔 hope sun will rise 🔜 .
The quality can be checked in the entrance exam of civil judge ..simple ! But can never be checked on the basis of different university including private universities where anyone can get a degree with 70%
Very good arguments.
these guys have no ground reality. being good in college doesn't mean anything
State should oppose these rule becoz govt law they run ground reality they should better like mp state so rural and poor how can quility judge came judiciary I think out mp students selected this kind exm
That's more required, as a sr member of bar, no quality output of those enrolling frim university.
Jaitely sir daid rights difficult to fail llb easy to pass ca
Is the age limit prescribed for M.P.JUDGE POST?
yes
In Govt law universities, faculty are reluctant to give marks in liberated manner
Supreme Court must understand that 75+ years no government could developed through reservation and such discrepancy to youth's that nation now ruled by reservation and deserved are leaving our beloved Nation.
World over Indian Deserved are reaching power to promote those respective countries.
STRICTLY STOP RESERVATION & ALLOW DESERVED TO BE PROTECTED
Minimum marks awarded in Law Colleges will be henceforth 70% onwards. Why this litigation court cases etc etc.. Chill folks..
Sc descision is unfair y don't yu extend training period
Not satisfied with this judgement. Because in up judiciary many district judges and civil judges are 3rd division in llb course. That keans they are not capable to handle judicial work.
this is for exemption of 3 years practice or 70% marks in LLB but not both sir, if you have 3 years practice then this 70% not applicable
😊
With due respect, this is a bad judgement in law , when a minimum graduation (pass marks) are prescribed for UPSC civil services examinations and why not judiciary and such a qualification of 70% is dangerous move
this is for exemption of 3 years practice or 70% marks in LLB but not both sir
Supreme Court judges can you tell me how much percentage have u got ??
This is how u decide, listen in Govt colleges no one will get above 70 % marks this is rare who will get it
so my dear bench u should do analysis then u have to give judgment u don’t even think what impact is going to happened of ur judgement to the student who r in appearing stage so pls think about this
And Now onward the student have to take admission in private colleges u will surely get 90 % marks without any hardwork
Supereme court 🤡
Sc always ryt
Heen judge. Notice bhej. Im involved and affected party.
My ❤ give me❤