Buxtehude - Suite in D minor, BuxWV 233 - Earl Wild

[@lacolombe2534]

DIETRICH BUXTEHUDE { BAD OLDESLOE, HOLSTEIN 1637~1707 LUBECK } ~ SUITE IN D MINOR { BUXWV 233 } ~ EARL WILD PIANO ~. Quelle merveille cette PIECES au piano interprétation grandiose bravo, de ce chef-d'œuvre de BUXTEHUDE. Un des grands compositeurs de la musique baroque, qui passe les trente première année de sa vie au Danemark ou il est formé probablement par son père organiste il occupera trois postes d'organiste a HELSINGBORG, SAINTE-MARIE D' ELSENEUR et à SAINTE-MARIE de LUBECK ou il finit ses jours. Il institue les veillées musicale de l'Avent ABENDMUSIKEN. Il fut en son temp le compositeur le plus célèbre en Allemagne et un musicien au rayonnement européen. Merci pour ce moment de musique baroque au PIANO grandiose Eternel.

[@chrisczajasager]

Earl Wild at his best: pianist and arranger, making the Baldwin sounding quite wonderful

[@mikekarren5010]

Seriously, a Baldwin in Carnegie Hall? You must be mistaken!

[@hawkwood67]

Wonderful!

[@takapianist]

Very interesting interpretation! Courante is from another Suite, BuxWV 234

[@Fervorum]

Just to people know, there is a lot of arrangement over the original by Buxtehude.

[@excelsior999]

Well, that's what Wild did, with many pieces. It is what it is. Enjoy it.

[@MrGar11]

9:56-10:10 Bach stolen it

[@enriquesanchez2001]

HAHA everybody steals!~♥♥♥

[@mikekarren5010]

2 points of evidence: 1. Quoting Wikipedia...In 1705, J.S. Bach, then a young man of twenty, walked from Arnstadt to Lübeck, a distance of more than 400 kilometres (250 mi), and stayed nearly three months to hear the Abendmusik, meet the pre-eminent Lübeck organist, hear him play, and, as Bach explained, "to comprehend one thing and another about his art" So I pose, if Bach were 20, he could have written this little diddy before Bux, and therefore it's the other way round? Or were you there Merlin? 2. I scanned the dates of his works, the latest one I could find was 1699. So I guess he couldn't have copied Bach as Bux didn't compose anything after Bach's visit. He was dead 2 years later. Perhaps you win...Bach was a thief. But it wasn't illegal, because in those days there were no copyright laws! Last point of interest...Bux was 68 when he was playing the organ for Bach.

[@MrGar11]

6:44-7:07 Bach stolen it

[@metteholm4833]

No. Bach visited Buxtehude and learned from hin - and when hr arrived back in Ohrdruf, the church goers thought, that his preludes were a little to the wild side :-)

[@Taka-Musics-Labo]

@@metteholm4833
In your comment, there are so many wrong spellings!!