The NEXAT project represents a significant leap in agricultural technology, pointing towards the future of farming. It's exciting to see such innovation in action. I'm curious about the specific ways NEXAT is transforming traditional farming practices. What are the most groundbreaking features of this next-generation technology, and how do they address current agricultural challenges? Also, how does NEXAT integrate sustainability and efficiency into its design and function? It’s fascinating to witness the cutting-edge advancements shaping the future of agriculture!
I suspect that this system will make it difficult for the farmer to improve his profitability until numerous 3rd-party implement manufacturers develop alternative thrashing heads, seed drills, cultivators, sprayers, etc. to attach to the basic NEXAT tractor system. There has to be competition among equipment manufacturers in order to get the sale price (cost) down. Competition is considerable (among equipment manufacturers) of standard tractors, pull-behind implements, and combine harvesters because many different brands and models can be mixed and matched so easily. A farmer does not want to work himself into a corner where he is completely dependent upon any manufacturer (like NEXAT) to provide all of his equipment. That is a very risky position to be in. What if NEXAT charges too much for its machines because they know that the farmer has to buy from them? What if NEXAT has financial problems and either goes out of business or reduces their offering of available implements. For example, the market has to advance to a stage where the farmer can buy the tractor from NEXAT, the seed drill implement independently from John Deere/Case/Gleaner, the thrashing system from John Deere/Case/Gleaner, the combine header from McDonn (or others), etc. Then there will be true competition and the farmer will be faced with less risk. Ed Schultheis, PE Schultek Engineering & Technology, Inc. Washington state, USA web - schultek
You are right. Im not sure they will fit North America. But in Europe with narrow roads for transportation, you get alot of workwidth in a narrow frame by simply turning the wheels 90 degrees for transport
The implements are independently made by the other manufacturers like (currently) Väderstadt, Dammann, etc. Due to the already high request for the machine, there will be implements from other companies, too. So then you can chose between various drills, cultivators, etc. On the other hand, keep in mind that larger farms are mostly Full-line John Deere or CaseIH, which makes your point about dependency to a Single manufacturer pointless.
@@moritz2456 This is not the same as a farmer running exclusively John Deere or CaseIH machines. If JD or Case tractors are no longer available, there are are several other brands of tractors that the farmer can switch to immediately and never lose time in the field. However, if the NEXAT tractor is no longer available, all of the farmer's other custom-built equipment (for the NEXAT tractor) is useless because there is no other tractor brand that can replace the NEXAT tractor. Also, JD and Case have been in business for many, many decades (perhaps over 100 years each). On the other hand, NEXAT could turn out to be just a fad. Nobody would be surprised if the NEXAT tractor disappeared in 10 years. If so, what will a farmer do with all of his near-useless custom-built machinery that only fits on a NEXAT tractor?
@@edschultheis9537 well, you might have a point here. But, if you are consequent you have to keep in mind that the same thing you described about Nexat also happened when tractors replaced horses. A horse hasnt a 3 point hitch, does it? Of course, the Nexat will be used on farms running >50 tractors/ combines first. But in a few years it might be a valuable part of the market. Also, these large farms replace their Equipment every 3-5 years, so if nexat disappeared, it would take only
Campo Grande Capital De Mato Grosso do Sul 🇧🇷 Brasil 🇧🇷 Parabéns Está Máquina do Futuro tem Vários Implementos Plataforma de Colher Milho 🌽 ,Colher Soja, Pulverização de Herbicidas e Incetisida etc, Muita Tecnologia Embarcada A Evolução, Viva a Agricultura 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
I don't like how far away the cabin is from the other side... how can the farmer see what he is doing all the way on the other side, or if something is broken or about to break
Still makes lining up your rows easier and transporting in-between fields with additional attachments makes this better than anything else on the market. Judging on the channels response your one worry is invalid. Anything new comes with a learning curve - doesn't mean anything is wrong with it.
*I have a suspicion that this system might pose challenges for farmers in improving profitability until more third-party implement manufacturers create alternative attachments for the NEXAT tractor system. Competition among equipment makers is essential to drive down costs. Farmers don't want to be solely dependent on one manufacturer like NEXAT. What if they charge too much or face financial issues? It's important for the market to advance so farmers can buy tractor, implements, and headers from different brands, fostering true competition and reducing risks.* 🚜🌾
What immediately strikes me about this is the bare soil & dust rising. Leading edge arable agriculture is fast moving towards minimum till or no till systems & cover crops that provide nutrients while preventing soil erosion. It will be interesting to see if this multi use machine can work with that. My guess is that we are sone years away from this being actually used on a farm.
Whoever can afford to use it but I think that's the point. Push out all the smaller farmers until only a handful of those owned by Bayer are left farming the world's food supply
@@PHIL5251 We were sold out for globalism decades ago. All that's needed now is the global currency. The only ones truly in power are the ones who issue that currency.
@@4Core100 Or rather, small farms will be as okay as they were before. Less regulated capitalism will lead to fewer and fewer small farms, just as it has been for the last 100 years. A fancy tractor (I really love the NEXAT, but it _is_ just a fancy tractor) changes nothing in that regard.
Problem I see is the track system sits outside the width of the implement. Leading to either driving on/in already planted crop or just leaving the tracks which leads to compaction over time of those tracks.
Would like to see this thing working soil to see how actually good or bad it does I wonder how many board plows It would take to stop this machine I don’t think It could handle the full width for sure
I completely agree. I think such a tractor will pull a plow no more than 9-10 meters wide. Although on light soil you can do more. NEXAT technical data video: ua-cam.com/video/WX4JZCSf5uI/v-deo.html
@@TractorLab this system is designed for no till farming, you dont have to break compaction, when you aren't creating it in the first place, the idea is, that this tracks will always folow the same path wich will work as a road while the 95% of the field wouldn't be driven on
@@hausaffe100 you still have to till after what 3 years because the roots of the years before make the ground worse, and as a crop farmer it is advised by many to deeptill every 8 or 9 years
Big deal. I've already got a couple units to which different modules can be attached for different jobs, making them very versatile. They're called tractors.
And with regular tractors the only common systems that they need to be compatible with the implement that they are pulling include the following: - a hitch with a single hitch pin - alternatively, a standardized 3-point hitch assembly - common hydraulic connectors - common connectors for the electrical/electronics system (if necessary) Just hook it up and go.
@@cy-one I imagine the sheer width would make it very difficult to deal with though. You either pull only 1 side and just spin it around, or pull the middle, which would put a ton of stress on the rest of the machine.
Das System funktioniert nur im Film. In der Praxis ist es nicht einsatzbereit und es ist viel zu teuer und anfällig. Wenn es in der Ukraine während der Saison nur 2bis 3 Tage ausfällt sind die Kosten nicht mehr aufzuholen! Ersatzteilbeschaffung für dieses Gerät ist in der Ukraine von vornherein eine unlösbare Aufgabe. Besser 3 konventionelle Mähdrescher, Sägeräte, Düngerstreuer,Feldspritze,Traktoren etc.und die Arbeit wird erledigt auch dann wenn eine Maschine ausfällt. Diese Maschine benötigt zudem einen speziell geschulten Fahrer den man niergends in diesen Einsatzgebieten finden kann.
@@TractorLab Frag nicht. Vor hundert Jahren hätte schwarz bunt gemoppert das diese "Traktoren" eh Mist sind und man dafür keine Fahrer findet und man lieber bei Pferden bleiben sollte :D
just brainstorming, what if it were broken into sections that could move up and down independently, kind of like a smaller version of a center pivot? could totally help with steeper fields if they can get it working!
also yeah it does look like the visibility is terrible, but with how advanced this tech is supposed to be, im sure theres cameras mounted on it with cab access to help with that. also your point abt it being hard to move on roads is still somewhat valid, but you did see how it turns its tracks to drive on roads longways right?
@@jonpickett704cameras would help but in my experience it’s always more helpful to be able to see it yourself. Adding to your flex idea they could have the attachments have hinge points in them to flex with the contour of the land. In regards to road transit it’s good in terms of width, but imo the trouble point is going from road to field. In my area here in the US we have road ditches for drainage, so we wouldn’t be able to drive it in in field mode, and your run a good bit of crop over before harvest if you pulled in with road mode and converted. Main issues imo are the proprietary implements and visibility.
Any farmer dealing with any of those scenarios isn’t going to be affording or buying this lol. This is for the massive operations in the American Midwest, Canada, Brazil, etc. it isn’t made for Jim Bob and his 200 acres of hay. Also you say it’s “complicated to move on roads” seems a hell of a lot simpler than a normal combine that doesn’t fit in the lanes. It’s also a European product so if it can fit on European roads it’ll be fine in America Ana Canada.
@@zgrif there can be big operators on hilly ground, but besides that you’re fairly correct. The main flaw in my book is the poor visibility and the fact that you’d have to swap your entire equipment fleet for it. Historically All in one solutions haven’t done well as people like to have options and not be limited by compatibility so much.
was the audio done by a robot voice? If so I find it very unnerving with the sudden stops and starts and the mono tone voice. If it's a real person I'm sorry if I insulted you.
Umm it produces less carbon. The tractor are not problem. It's all the dust, open soil, and management that is the carbon problem. Do like combining operation.
IT all depends on the machine cost and running costs: In Brazil on the big farms We have all the machinery and implements and mechanics for the tractors, these ones we'll depend on the new system and people to run it.
@@hughmarcus1 In the Pacific Northwest, Palouse region of the US, we have been farming almost entirely no-till on our farm for the past 40 years. No-till allows us to mostly eliminate soil erosion on the hills, and it keeps more of the moisture in the ground (rather than evaporating every time it is tilled). It is some of the richest farmland in the US, but there are a lot of steep rolling hills. In the Palouse region many hill sides of 30 - 40 degrees are farmed and a few up to about 45 degrees. This machine wouldn't work in our area though, because the thrashing system on the combine has to have automatic leveling on those steep slopes in order to thrash properly and save most of the grain.
This machine has been designed for harvesting and spraying of large flat areas. From my experience cropping here in Australia 🇦🇺 our working window is more flexible than in the USA. One size doesn't fit all. Minimum till has its place, but the ground does have to be worked up at some stage. I see this machine as another possible alternative to getting the grain crop off the ground and out of the paddock before the afternoon storms degrade the crop.
Did you even watch the video? It has 2 diesel engines to power the electric motors just like a train here in the US and those big mining trucks that are size of a house
Nexat's fate is that of the Fendt Trisix: in a couple years, it'll be history. It doesn't bring anything new, it is not revolutionary (no matter how much they try to push it), it is not disruptive, it does not reinvent the wheel. Plus, everything you know about agricultural equipment, you can throw it out since this monster is all electric.
The NEXAT system has been test-driven on some extremely challenging farms over several years, and has already proven itself up to the task. NEXAT technical data video: ua-cam.com/video/WX4JZCSf5uI/v-deo.html
Buenicimo !. Nicess !. Muy excellent El trabajo del operador !!.. Amigo para Mi entender Quisiera saber sobre su mantenimiento ? Usted Usted Dice en el video que la combinada esta operada por Dos motores diesel ? Thanks you. .
Great theory. Real world this is still far off in the future thing. And they make it sound like this works everywhere and for every crop. Don’t think so.
@@TractorLab you won’t get the full answer until it get used in rice. Specially California rice. We wear holes in modern harvesters like kids wear holes in the knees of their pants. We tried no till and minimum till. Doesn’t work in our heavy Adobe clay. A 450 horsepower quad-trac is maxed out with 27’ in our soil during tillage.
So instead of a single tractor that can pull any implement or trailer of any kind you now have one machine with custom one off attachments. This kind of system really won't take off at all.
@@TractorLab One size fits all rarely works out. The expense will be insane, the machine is massive so current trailers won't work, being so far off to the side will be terrible for visibility of the whole work area. To me this feels like a non-farmer trying to make farm equipment.
@@jaxithfox agreed. I mean the size variation just for COMBINES can't be touched by this thing. And you can forget about getting that thing around in Italy or the UK.....
Na Ukrainie choćby już NEXATY wjechały na pola to i tak stare pancerne zasłużone fendty serii 800 favorit będą długo w rezerwie takich gospodarstw rolnych. ;) takich maszyn już nie ma... i nie będzie !
Funny thing is - I thought of this design about Ten or so years ago. Even drew up plans. Goes to show how ideas "spring" up in different places at different times -
Next Generation Agriculture Technology represents innovative advancements aimed at transforming traditional farming practices into more efficient, sustainable, and precise systems.
@@hinglemccringleberry8805 To big, to heavy...it will slip, and not "copy" the surface of the soil properly, also most of farms and roads are not prepared for equipment that big
Looks good but when it breaks down the farm is sol. The problems farmers have with new equipment breaking down and the right to repair I doubt they will want to take a chance on that machine
@@jerrycann6374 yes it's only about the software because you know they have to meet emissions standards and if people go in messing around with said software then it could take it under the emissions standards which would fall on the person and on Deere. Outside of that people thinks it means they wouldn't be allowed to fix anything which is false. It's also funny people are so mad about this but the auto industry has been trying and some of accomplished doing this but no one says a word about.
Looks like a modern day rehash of the Minneapolis Moline unitractor, or as it was often referred to as, " the Minneapolis Moline motorcycle". It was never a big seller, and quickly disappeared.
Only big farms and corporations can buy those things. I like small farmers without too expensive toys, which allow banks own their farms. Big farms produce cheap food, poor quality, using chemicals from big pharma. Small farmers can do more expensive food but good quality without chemicals which is excellent for us.
I can hear the old people. "Look at all those small parts. It's going to break all the time. Too many electrical components are just going to fail constantly." I say bring on the future of farming and leave the fossils of all kinds in the dirt.
This thing will lose to small, light weight autonomous machines, which can do the crop production tasks without much, or any, human oversight. The small machines can take care of the seeding and application tasks as well as scouting and weed destruction. Because they are light weight, they can traverse the field with little or no soil compaction. Autonomous smaller harvesting machines with large, but light foot print can accomplish harvest. That will remove all heavy vehicles from the field and leave them on the service roads or public roads. Also, the small machines will be required to be built in large quantities, allowing them to be made from components made with manufacturing technology yielding low parts cost, something the Nexat will never achieve. Autonomously operating machines directly addresses the labor scarcity plaguing farming operations around the world. With time and with it increased experience with operating a fleet of the machines becomes a non-issue. Scaling, both up and down, to fit your farming operation's needs, become easy with small unit machines. You add a few or sell a few to match your capacity need. The Nexat can't offer that flexibility. One critical aspect of farming is getting the job at hand within the time window that offers the greatest yield potential, or revenue potential. With many small autonomously operating machines performing the work, a single machine breakdown means only the loss of a small fraction of your capacity. Replacing the capacity of one small machine could likely be done with a dealer technician and a pickup truck making a trip the the field with the broken down unit, swap out the whole unit, which might not weigh more than 20-40kg, and back to the shop to fix the issue, while the loaner works. Now think about the sheer size of the Nexat, the weight of the components it's made from. If one small system on that machine stops functioning correctly, your total capacity is down until it can be fixed. The machine might be stuck in the field until such, not able to move. Good luck trying to pick it up and take it home to the shop or to the dealer for repair. Its a looser.
Lektor wspomniał w filmie że posiada dwa generatory prądu zasilane dwoma silnikami Diesla o mocy 550km kazdy a cały system jest przygotowany do zasilania ogniwami wodorowymi.
@@jarosawprzyucki5708 cena pewnie jeszcze nie znana. Dopiero się pochwalili czymś co testowali przez parę lat. Podejrzewam że koszt będzie coś w stylu =2 ciągniki 500km + cena jednego bądź półtora kombajnu w stylu lex 8900( bo niby ma wydajność 1.5-2 razy większą niż największe maszyny konkurencji . Czyli około 6 melonów za moduł do koszenia i nośnik- moje ostrożne szacunki.. podejrzewam że na osprzęcie będą kosić tzn maszyny vaderstad w przeliczeniu na metry szerokości roboczej wyjdą drożej niż te podczepiane pod normalne ciągniki
@@mikemiklowicz4107 sprzęt fajny ale chyba jego zakup to tak minimum jak sie ma 5tys hektarow ornego ,według Twoich ostrożnych wyliczeń jak przyjdzie dokupić do modułu koszącego moduł opryskiwacza i uprawowo siewny to cena będzie za całośc około 8 milionów , jak sie to cholerstwo będzie psuło w miare mało to ogólnie moze 20 procent oszczednosci czasu i funduszy z tego co dotychczas , no jakieś zadaszenie i to nie wąskie trzeba tak że narazie to sprzęt dla pasjonatów co mają oprócz gospodarstwa dochodowy interes żeby było z czego dokładac do hektarów
@@jarosawprzyucki5708 no słuchaj coś za coś. Podejrzewam że w Polsce raczej tego nie zobaczymy. Nawet jeśli 8 baniek to jak policzysz te dwa ciągniki duże 500km każdy, kombajn z dwoma hederami i wózkami na hedery, do tego gruber, siewnik, siewnik punktowy, opryskiwacz (wszystkie 4 wymienione maszyny X2) oraz dwa ciągniki do opryskiwaczy ( bo nie będziesz pryskać quadtrackiem:) ) to lekko tyle wydasz. Moje wątpliwości nie dotyczą kasy bo ja widzę tu 3 problemy: 1) co gdy trzeba i kosić kuku i siać bądź uprawiać a nośnik jest jeden? Bądź żniwa się opóźnią jak w tym roku i trzeba będzie i kosić i siać rzepak 2) co gdy się zepsuje? Wtedy wszystko stoi. 3) jak się zakopie, to czym to wyciągnąć i czy się ta dlugachna konstrukcja nie pognie? Sprzęt wygląda imponująco, jednak mi po obejrzeniu kilku filmów zaczęły się wyświetlać na głównej filmy z Anglii, Australii, Holandii i Hiszpanii z takimi samymi pomysłami. Z tego co pamiętam Anglicy myśleli o tym dużo wcześniej, jakieś 20-30 lat temu gdy CTF wchodzil w modę. Jakoś do dzis maszyna nie zawojowała świata. Wg mnie sprzęt ok, ale na kołchozy gdzie są tysiące hektarów w jednym siedlisku. Bo jak tym przez miasteczko dojechać? A i najlepiej na stepach w Rosji czy Kazachstanie gdzie jest sucho. Bo powiem jeszcze raz - nie widzę tego jak się topi u nas na Warmii czy w Małopolsce. Pozdro
20 лет назад я предложил сделать такую технику нашим Белоруским заводам. Не вы первые это придумали но первые сделали браво.
так це ви один з братів Райт?))))
В 70-х годах НАТИ были созданы, а ХТЗ изготовлены макетные образцы колесно-гусеничного трактора ТЭТ-1000.
The NEXAT project represents a significant leap in agricultural technology, pointing towards the future of farming. It's exciting to see such innovation in action. I'm curious about the specific ways NEXAT is transforming traditional farming practices. What are the most groundbreaking features of this next-generation technology, and how do they address current agricultural challenges? Also, how does NEXAT integrate sustainability and efficiency into its design and function? It’s fascinating to witness the cutting-edge advancements shaping the future of agriculture!
Give one of these to Mike Mitchell in canada 😉 he'll give them a good test
NEXAT testing in Ukraine now.
@@TractorLab So that's what the Russians are coming after ! Better evacuate that thing while you can.
@@TractorLab how far from combat? Seems like they could load cargo on them well
HAHAHA Yes
@Ruben Braekman couldn't agree more
3.38min.This thing makesyou the best friend to other land owners when you drive over there field at every curve...
I suspect that this system will make it difficult for the farmer to improve his profitability until numerous 3rd-party implement manufacturers develop alternative thrashing heads, seed drills, cultivators, sprayers, etc. to attach to the basic NEXAT tractor system. There has to be competition among equipment manufacturers in order to get the sale price (cost) down. Competition is considerable (among equipment manufacturers) of standard tractors, pull-behind implements, and combine harvesters because many different brands and models can be mixed and matched so easily. A farmer does not want to work himself into a corner where he is completely dependent upon any manufacturer (like NEXAT) to provide all of his equipment. That is a very risky position to be in. What if NEXAT charges too much for its machines because they know that the farmer has to buy from them? What if NEXAT has financial problems and either goes out of business or reduces their offering of available implements. For example, the market has to advance to a stage where the farmer can buy the tractor from NEXAT, the seed drill implement independently from John Deere/Case/Gleaner, the thrashing system from John Deere/Case/Gleaner, the combine header from McDonn (or others), etc. Then there will be true competition and the farmer will be faced with less risk.
Ed Schultheis, PE
Schultek Engineering & Technology, Inc.
Washington state, USA
web - schultek
¢
You are right. Im not sure they will fit North America. But in Europe with narrow roads for transportation, you get alot of workwidth in a narrow frame by simply turning the wheels 90 degrees for transport
The implements are independently made by the other manufacturers like (currently) Väderstadt, Dammann, etc.
Due to the already high request for the machine, there will be implements from other companies, too. So then you can chose between various drills, cultivators, etc.
On the other hand, keep in mind that larger farms are mostly Full-line John Deere or CaseIH, which makes your point about dependency to a Single manufacturer pointless.
@@moritz2456 This is not the same as a farmer running exclusively John Deere or CaseIH machines. If JD or Case tractors are no longer available, there are are several other brands of tractors that the farmer can switch to immediately and never lose time in the field. However, if the NEXAT tractor is no longer available, all of the farmer's other custom-built equipment (for the NEXAT tractor) is useless because there is no other tractor brand that can replace the NEXAT tractor. Also, JD and Case have been in business for many, many decades (perhaps over 100 years each). On the other hand, NEXAT could turn out to be just a fad. Nobody would be surprised if the NEXAT tractor disappeared in 10 years. If so, what will a farmer do with all of his near-useless custom-built machinery that only fits on a NEXAT tractor?
@@edschultheis9537 well, you might have a point here. But, if you are consequent you have to keep in mind that the same thing you described about Nexat also happened when tractors replaced horses. A horse hasnt a 3 point hitch, does it?
Of course, the Nexat will be used on farms running >50 tractors/ combines first. But in a few years it might be a valuable part of the market.
Also, these large farms replace their Equipment every 3-5 years, so if nexat disappeared, it would take only
This thing is amazing! It has the potential to be a game changer.
Oh, yes. I think it's realy a game changer!
This thing completely automated is pretty scary to think about. Really cool technology! Looks like the future! Lol
Campo Grande Capital De Mato Grosso do Sul 🇧🇷 Brasil 🇧🇷 Parabéns Está Máquina do Futuro tem Vários Implementos Plataforma de Colher Milho 🌽 ,Colher Soja, Pulverização de Herbicidas e Incetisida etc, Muita Tecnologia Embarcada A Evolução, Viva a Agricultura 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
I don't like how far away the cabin is from the other side... how can the farmer see what he is doing all the way on the other side, or if something is broken or about to break
Nexat is equipped with video cameras, because at this width the operator really can not see what is happening at the other end of the tractor.
Still makes lining up your rows easier and transporting in-between fields with additional attachments makes this better than anything else on the market. Judging on the channels response your one worry is invalid. Anything new comes with a learning curve - doesn't mean anything is wrong with it.
Welcome to cameras my guy. You don't even drive your car without them anymore.
Very interesting machinery, lateral thinking at its best.
A melhor tecnologia do mundo para o agro !
*I have a suspicion that this system might pose challenges for farmers in improving profitability until more third-party implement manufacturers create alternative attachments for the NEXAT tractor system. Competition among equipment makers is essential to drive down costs. Farmers don't want to be solely dependent on one manufacturer like NEXAT. What if they charge too much or face financial issues? It's important for the market to advance so farmers can buy tractor, implements, and headers from different brands, fostering true competition and reducing risks.* 🚜🌾
What immediately strikes me about this is the bare soil & dust rising. Leading edge arable agriculture is fast moving towards minimum till or no till systems & cover crops that provide nutrients while preventing soil erosion. It will be interesting to see if this multi use machine can work with that.
My guess is that we are sone years away from this being actually used on a farm.
Whoever can afford to use it but I think that's the point. Push out all the smaller farmers until only a handful of those owned by Bayer are left farming the world's food supply
@@sgtstedanko7186 China owns 100,000 acres in the United States shipping food home for free
@@PHIL5251 We were sold out for globalism decades ago. All that's needed now is the global currency. The only ones truly in power are the ones who issue that currency.
Dustless farming? I doubt it my lifetime.
@@sgtstedanko7186 oh now u see it its been like that for the past 100 years
This is amazing but as a farmer from a family run setup all I see here is factory farming and the death of smaller farms.
Factory farming is already here.
@@robwar2288 Of course, but it's going to get worse. By worse I mean less independents.
@@armedfarm3429 yes it is!
This is just tractor in different shape. Everything you see on video is already being used worldwide. Small farms will be ok.
@@4Core100 Or rather, small farms will be as okay as they were before.
Less regulated capitalism will lead to fewer and fewer small farms, just as it has been for the last 100 years.
A fancy tractor (I really love the NEXAT, but it _is_ just a fancy tractor) changes nothing in that regard.
Problem I see is the track system sits outside the width of the implement. Leading to either driving on/in already planted crop or just leaving the tracks which leads to compaction over time of those tracks.
But the rest of the field is not compacted by the tracks at all.
Controlled Traffic Farming (CTF)
Thats part of the System, leading to just about 5% of the area being compacted which is a pretty low amount compared to conventional systems.
Whats the difference in this vs a tractor hooking up to an implement?
This tractor has a constant track width: NEXAT technical data video: ua-cam.com/video/WX4JZCSf5uI/v-deo.html
@@TractorLab EVERY tractor has a constant width......
Indeed one of incredible farm machines ever invented
The concept is not new, but a comprehensive approach is
Oh, yes!
What about high country where there are all sorts of hills and terraces and pipes?
NEXAT is testing in Ukraine, where length of the field 800-1000 m
@@TractorLab Ukraine is flat though ain’t it
what will the high school kids do for jobs in the summer?
Would like to see this thing working soil to see how actually good or bad it does I wonder how many board plows It would take to stop this machine I don’t think It could handle the full width for sure
I completely agree. I think such a tractor will pull a plow no more than 9-10 meters wide. Although on light soil you can do more.
NEXAT technical data video: ua-cam.com/video/WX4JZCSf5uI/v-deo.html
@@TractorLab this system is designed for no till farming, you dont have to break compaction, when you aren't creating it in the first place, the idea is, that this tracks will always folow the same path wich will work as a road while the 95% of the field wouldn't be driven on
@@hausaffe100 you still have to till after what 3 years because the roots of the years before make the ground worse, and as a crop farmer it is advised by many to deeptill every 8 or 9 years
@@DaPichla94 mot with this practice afaik
Very nice design, but also a bit weird to sit on the side, instead of the midlle.
Nexat is equipped with video cameras, because at this width the operator really can not see what is happening at the other end of the tractor.
it would be interesting to see a mower/conditioner and round or large square baling attachments
Big deal. I've already got a couple units to which different modules can be attached for different jobs, making them very versatile. They're called tractors.
Right lol. This is just a bunch of over complicated junk to break and leave you stranded and losing money.
And with regular tractors the only common systems that they need to be compatible with the implement that they are pulling include the following:
- a hitch with a single hitch pin
- alternatively, a standardized 3-point hitch assembly
- common hydraulic connectors
- common connectors for the electrical/electronics system (if necessary)
Just hook it up and go.
yes im unable to find the cost but replacing so many implements is a start --i like that it turn tracks and doesnt pivot
How does it work in mud? And if it gets stuck, how much of a pain is to pull out?
*Absolutely fascinating equipment, showcasing some brilliant out-of-the-box thinking.*
What do you do if you get that thing stuck? Looks like you still need other equipment.
Probably the same you do when your harvester or tractor gets stuck.
@@cy-one I imagine the sheer width would make it very difficult to deal with though. You either pull only 1 side and just spin it around, or pull the middle, which would put a ton of stress on the rest of the machine.
Wow! Amazing Agriculture Technology!
It can run 25km or 15mls/h on the road ? 🤔
That cab set up is cool as shot
Very interesting to watch. I'm really hoping someone makes this as a mod for farming simulator
Das System funktioniert nur im Film. In der Praxis ist es nicht einsatzbereit und es ist viel zu teuer und anfällig. Wenn es in der Ukraine während der Saison nur 2bis 3 Tage ausfällt sind die Kosten nicht mehr aufzuholen! Ersatzteilbeschaffung für dieses Gerät ist in der Ukraine von vornherein eine unlösbare Aufgabe. Besser 3 konventionelle Mähdrescher, Sägeräte, Düngerstreuer,Feldspritze,Traktoren etc.und die Arbeit wird erledigt auch dann wenn eine Maschine ausfällt. Diese Maschine benötigt zudem einen speziell geschulten Fahrer den man niergends in diesen Einsatzgebieten finden kann.
Ich frage mich, warum dieser Traktor in der Ukraine getestet wird?
@@TractorLab Frag nicht. Vor hundert Jahren hätte schwarz bunt gemoppert das diese "Traktoren" eh Mist sind und man dafür keine Fahrer findet und man lieber bei Pferden bleiben sollte :D
2.75 million for it and the attachments. 😮
Doesn't work if land isn't flat, fields too small, bad visibility, complicated to move on roads
just brainstorming, what if it were broken into sections that could move up and down independently, kind of like a smaller version of a center pivot? could totally help with steeper fields if they can get it working!
also yeah it does look like the visibility is terrible, but with how advanced this tech is supposed to be, im sure theres cameras mounted on it with cab access to help with that. also your point abt it being hard to move on roads is still somewhat valid, but you did see how it turns its tracks to drive on roads longways right?
@@jonpickett704cameras would help but in my experience it’s always more helpful to be able to see it yourself. Adding to your flex idea they could have the attachments have hinge points in them to flex with the contour of the land. In regards to road transit it’s good in terms of width, but imo the trouble point is going from road to field. In my area here in the US we have road ditches for drainage, so we wouldn’t be able to drive it in in field mode, and your run a good bit of crop over before harvest if you pulled in with road mode and converted. Main issues imo are the proprietary implements and visibility.
Any farmer dealing with any of those scenarios isn’t going to be affording or buying this lol. This is for the massive operations in the American Midwest, Canada, Brazil, etc. it isn’t made for Jim Bob and his 200 acres of hay.
Also you say it’s “complicated to move on roads” seems a hell of a lot simpler than a normal combine that doesn’t fit in the lanes. It’s also a European product so if it can fit on European roads it’ll be fine in America Ana Canada.
@@zgrif there can be big operators on hilly ground, but besides that you’re fairly correct. The main flaw in my book is the poor visibility and the fact that you’d have to swap your entire equipment fleet for it. Historically All in one solutions haven’t done well as people like to have options and not be limited by compatibility so much.
Are there some mods of this on Farming Simulator 22 yet?
was the audio done by a robot voice?
If so I find it very unnerving with the sudden stops and starts and the mono tone voice.
If it's a real person I'm sorry if I insulted you.
Umm it produces less carbon. The tractor are not problem. It's all the dust, open soil, and management that is the carbon problem. Do like combining operation.
New subscriber. Brilliant video 💪🏻🏴
IT all depends on the machine cost and running costs: In Brazil on the big farms We have all the machinery and implements and mechanics for the tractors, these ones we'll depend on the new system and people to run it.
Ja richtig, wirklich eine neue Generation ! 👍 ( wie breit ? )
камазы, уралы, вазовская классика, полуразрушенные базовки, где это снимали?, или это хороший рендер
это в Украине совместно с немцами делают
I'd like to see it in adverse conditions
This tractor has a constant track width: NEXAT technical data video: ua-cam.com/video/WX4JZCSf5uI/v-deo.html
Most of the agricultural operations that this machine can perform have been presented. But how do you plow the ground to a width of 24 meters?
24 meter width cultivator machine, but not plough
Ploughing is dying out. It must if we are to preserve soils from erosion. Leading edge crop growing is now either minimum till or no till.
Ploughing is a thing of the past. Chemicals are taking the place of working the ground. Jury is still out on whether it’s a good idea or not.
@@hughmarcus1 In the Pacific Northwest, Palouse region of the US, we have been farming almost entirely no-till on our farm for the past 40 years. No-till allows us to mostly eliminate soil erosion on the hills, and it keeps more of the moisture in the ground (rather than evaporating every time it is tilled). It is some of the richest farmland in the US, but there are a lot of steep rolling hills. In the Palouse region many hill sides of 30 - 40 degrees are farmed and a few up to about 45 degrees. This machine wouldn't work in our area though, because the thrashing system on the combine has to have automatic leveling on those steep slopes in order to thrash properly and save most of the grain.
This machine has been designed for harvesting and spraying of large flat areas. From my experience cropping here in Australia 🇦🇺 our working window is more flexible than in the USA. One size doesn't fit all. Minimum till has its place, but the ground does have to be worked up at some stage. I see this machine as another possible alternative to getting the grain crop off the ground and out of the paddock before the afternoon storms degrade the crop.
Viva a tecnologia 😍😍😍😍🤗🤗🤗👏👏👏🙋♂️
Only an 18-row planter?
The fact this is electric and not diesel-powered makes me really happy.
Did you even watch the video? It has 2 diesel engines to power the electric motors just like a train here in the US and those big mining trucks that are size of a house
It has 2 Diesel motors to power generators on the machine
It has 2 Diesel motors to power generators on the machine
Fascinating to see!
Thanks
Amigo !!..
Yo quisiera que ustedes hablará del mantenimiento de esta combinada ?
un tema muy interesante.
Muchas gracias por el video .
NEXAT technical data video: ua-cam.com/video/WX4JZCSf5uI/v-deo.html
More information about NEXAT tractor: www.nexat.de/en/the-system/
They really gotta put this in a dlc pack for fm22 or later fm games I would totally buy the NeXat
All the neigbors in my apartment complex would flip if I had one of these😎👍
Çok ilginç bir makine.
Pretty cool set up
What part does the music play, other than annoying?
Nexat's fate is that of the Fendt Trisix: in a couple years, it'll be history. It doesn't bring anything new, it is not revolutionary (no matter how much they try to push it), it is not disruptive, it does not reinvent the wheel. Plus, everything you know about agricultural equipment, you can throw it out since this monster is all electric.
I have one thing that does everything, untill it breaks. Then I have a broken thing that can't do anything. Good thing it has 2 engines, I guess.
The NEXAT system has been test-driven on some extremely challenging farms over several years, and has already proven itself up to the task.
NEXAT technical data video: ua-cam.com/video/WX4JZCSf5uI/v-deo.html
Buenicimo !.
Nicess !.
Muy excellent El trabajo del operador !!..
Amigo para
Mi entender Quisiera saber sobre su mantenimiento ?
Usted
Usted Dice en el video que la combinada esta operada por Dos motores diesel ?
Thanks you.
.
It's great👍👍👍
Great theory. Real world this is still far off in the future thing. And they make it sound like this works everywhere and for every crop. Don’t think so.
We shall receive the answer to this question in a few years.
@@TractorLab you won’t get the full answer until it get used in rice. Specially California rice.
We wear holes in modern harvesters like kids wear holes in the knees of their pants. We tried no till and minimum till. Doesn’t work in our heavy Adobe clay. A 450 horsepower quad-trac is maxed out with 27’ in our soil during tillage.
Taki sprzęt może i jest fajny ale dla wielko obszarowych gospodarstw A gdzie tu gospodarstwo rodzinne?
Tak, zgadzam się
Widząc co się dzieje na świecie można śmiało powiedzieć że rolnictwo zmierza ku dużym przedsiębiorstwom , na nasze nieszczęście..
That’s so sick…. Well done, I’m impressed…..
So instead of a single tractor that can pull any implement or trailer of any kind you now have one machine with custom one off attachments. This kind of system really won't take off at all.
This system is very promising, as it provides one tractor a full range of work, including harvesting.
@@TractorLab One size fits all rarely works out. The expense will be insane, the machine is massive so current trailers won't work, being so far off to the side will be terrible for visibility of the whole work area. To me this feels like a non-farmer trying to make farm equipment.
@@jaxithfox agreed. I mean the size variation just for COMBINES can't be touched by this thing. And you can forget about getting that thing around in Italy or the UK.....
Can I get this in farming sim 22???
Советском Союзе были такие разработки ещё в шестидесятых годах Поглядите ребята иностранцы хронику
How much 4 mill
Na Ukrainie choćby już NEXATY wjechały na pola to i tak stare pancerne zasłużone fendty serii 800 favorit będą długo w rezerwie takich gospodarstw rolnych. ;) takich maszyn już nie ma... i nie będzie !
Funny thing is - I thought of this design about Ten or so years ago. Even drew up plans. Goes to show how ideas "spring" up in different places at different times -
it seem all but good for environement
Next Generation Agriculture Technology represents innovative advancements aimed at transforming traditional farming practices into more efficient, sustainable, and precise systems.
So it's a fancy automated tractor
Uh there's a cab to it. It's not automated.
Salesman: “Ok sir, to get setup with your farming spread with all your attachments - that’ll be about $4 million”.
the bigger the farm equipment gets the less we will have
I'll take two, please.
Jack of all trades master of none!
But slow and difficult to move
Not fit for steep fields...therefore it is just a fancy tractor....stil cool though
How?
@@hinglemccringleberry8805 To big, to heavy...it will slip, and not "copy" the surface of the soil properly, also most of farms and roads are not prepared for equipment that big
Coming to fs22 ???
Nice good Chow👍👍
European technology is the best.
john deere king of machines
Wanna but one. Amazing 😍
this machine seems to have come out of Marvel movies as well
Very cool
Looks good but when it breaks down the farm is sol. The problems farmers have with new equipment breaking down and the right to repair I doubt they will want to take a chance on that machine
Don't understand right to repair huh? That's ok most don't. Right to repair is only about the software that runs the machine nothing else.
@@chadjustice8560 only about software? That involves about 80% of the equipment and the most common with the equipment.
@@jerrycann6374 yes it's only about the software because you know they have to meet emissions standards and if people go in messing around with said software then it could take it under the emissions standards which would fall on the person and on Deere. Outside of that people thinks it means they wouldn't be allowed to fix anything which is false. It's also funny people are so mad about this but the auto industry has been trying and some of accomplished doing this but no one says a word about.
☦️😎🔥 Manifest Excellence
Урал 0:20 5:25 7:00 КамАЗ 6:43 ВАЗ 2107 0:50 В России снимали.
It's Ukraine, not Russia
and the next version is designed without driver, just one little computer added!
This is amazing
Farmers already implement modularity by having a tractor with different Implements.
Demonstration was dry flat growing show me wet and uneven ground then let’s talk
In this system, the caterpillar track is moving on a compacted soil, so no problems will arise.
Looks like a modern day rehash of the Minneapolis Moline unitractor, or as it was often referred to as, " the Minneapolis Moline motorcycle". It was never a big seller, and quickly disappeared.
É de diferente inovador.
First to make an all in one? 🤣🤣 Apparently they haven't heard of the tried and failed New Idea Uni-System from 50 years ago....
Only big farms and corporations can buy those things. I like small farmers without too expensive toys, which allow banks own their farms. Big farms produce cheap food, poor quality, using chemicals from big pharma. Small farmers can do more expensive food but good quality without chemicals which is excellent for us.
I can hear the old people. "Look at all those small parts. It's going to break all the time. Too many electrical components are just going to fail constantly."
I say bring on the future of farming and leave the fossils of all kinds in the dirt.
This thing will lose to small, light weight autonomous machines, which can do the crop production tasks without much, or any, human oversight. The small machines can take care of the seeding and application tasks as well as scouting and weed destruction. Because they are light weight, they can traverse the field with little or no soil compaction. Autonomous smaller harvesting machines with large, but light foot print can accomplish harvest. That will remove all heavy vehicles from the field and leave them on the service roads or public roads.
Also, the small machines will be required to be built in large quantities, allowing them to be made from components made with manufacturing technology yielding low parts cost, something the Nexat will never achieve.
Autonomously operating machines directly addresses the labor scarcity plaguing farming operations around the world. With time and with it increased experience with operating a fleet of the machines becomes a non-issue. Scaling, both up and down, to fit your farming operation's needs, become easy with small unit machines. You add a few or sell a few to match your capacity need. The Nexat can't offer that flexibility.
One critical aspect of farming is getting the job at hand within the time window that offers the greatest yield potential, or revenue potential. With many small autonomously operating machines performing the work, a single machine breakdown means only the loss of a small fraction of your capacity. Replacing the capacity of one small machine could likely be done with a dealer technician and a pickup truck making a trip the the field with the broken down unit, swap out the whole unit, which might not weigh more than 20-40kg, and back to the shop to fix the issue, while the loaner works. Now think about the sheer size of the Nexat, the weight of the components it's made from. If one small system on that machine stops functioning correctly, your total capacity is down until it can be fixed. The machine might be stuck in the field until such, not able to move. Good luck trying to pick it up and take it home to the shop or to the dealer for repair.
Its a looser.
I have not seen small autonomous machines, but that makes more sense to me. You could have many small computer driven machines.
I like this
To elektryk?! Na ile starcza bateria.
Lektor wspomniał w filmie że posiada dwa generatory prądu zasilane dwoma silnikami Diesla o mocy 550km kazdy a cały system jest przygotowany do zasilania ogniwami wodorowymi.
@@mikemiklowicz4107 ciekawe ile taki komplet kosztuje wraz ze wszystkimi przystawkami ? no i jaki koszt servisu
@@jarosawprzyucki5708 cena pewnie jeszcze nie znana. Dopiero się pochwalili czymś co testowali przez parę lat. Podejrzewam że koszt będzie coś w stylu =2 ciągniki 500km + cena jednego bądź półtora kombajnu w stylu lex 8900( bo niby ma wydajność 1.5-2 razy większą niż największe maszyny konkurencji . Czyli około 6 melonów za moduł do koszenia i nośnik- moje ostrożne szacunki.. podejrzewam że na osprzęcie będą kosić tzn maszyny vaderstad w przeliczeniu na metry szerokości roboczej wyjdą drożej niż te podczepiane pod normalne ciągniki
@@mikemiklowicz4107 sprzęt fajny ale chyba jego zakup to tak minimum jak sie ma 5tys hektarow ornego ,według Twoich ostrożnych wyliczeń jak przyjdzie dokupić do modułu koszącego moduł opryskiwacza i uprawowo siewny to cena będzie za całośc około 8 milionów , jak sie to cholerstwo będzie psuło w miare mało to ogólnie moze 20 procent oszczednosci czasu i funduszy z tego co dotychczas , no jakieś zadaszenie i to nie wąskie trzeba tak że narazie to sprzęt dla pasjonatów co mają oprócz gospodarstwa dochodowy interes żeby było z czego dokładac do hektarów
@@jarosawprzyucki5708 no słuchaj coś za coś. Podejrzewam że w Polsce raczej tego nie zobaczymy. Nawet jeśli 8 baniek to jak policzysz te dwa ciągniki duże 500km każdy, kombajn z dwoma hederami i wózkami na hedery, do tego gruber, siewnik, siewnik punktowy, opryskiwacz (wszystkie 4 wymienione maszyny X2) oraz dwa ciągniki do opryskiwaczy ( bo nie będziesz pryskać quadtrackiem:) ) to lekko tyle wydasz. Moje wątpliwości nie dotyczą kasy bo ja widzę tu 3 problemy: 1) co gdy trzeba i kosić kuku i siać bądź uprawiać a nośnik jest jeden? Bądź żniwa się opóźnią jak w tym roku i trzeba będzie i kosić i siać rzepak 2) co gdy się zepsuje? Wtedy wszystko stoi. 3) jak się zakopie, to czym to wyciągnąć i czy się ta dlugachna konstrukcja nie pognie?
Sprzęt wygląda imponująco, jednak mi po obejrzeniu kilku filmów zaczęły się wyświetlać na głównej filmy z Anglii, Australii, Holandii i Hiszpanii z takimi samymi pomysłami. Z tego co pamiętam Anglicy myśleli o tym dużo wcześniej, jakieś 20-30 lat temu gdy CTF wchodzil w modę. Jakoś do dzis maszyna nie zawojowała świata. Wg mnie sprzęt ok, ale na kołchozy gdzie są tysiące hektarów w jednym siedlisku. Bo jak tym przez miasteczko dojechać? A i najlepiej na stepach w Rosji czy Kazachstanie gdzie jest sucho. Bo powiem jeszcze raz - nie widzę tego jak się topi u nas na Warmii czy w Małopolsce.
Pozdro
Very soon we'll see humans become fully obsolete.
Cuanto cuestan 💵