This is my dream before my eyes! Amazing work. From Uganda, a small East African country, we're a food basket for the entire East and Central Africa for generations. With machines like this, with such fertile soils, absolute tropical seasons, can only be thankful to God. May God have mercy on Ukraine and there's a peaceful resolution to the war. I'd like such a machine and more of it for sure.
@@blauer2551 probably not ....a funny joke at all! GDP doesn't always reflect the actual story as there're so many variables involved. Besides, the world we live today has no place for such a level of ignorance 🙃
@@kakyalidaniel9607 Well I can tell you most American farmers couldn’t dream of such a purchase. The joke is the price of equipment, even used, and how much maintenance and repairs are.
@@satunnainenkatselija4478 "It needs to be serviceable by local technicians" They can only be maintained and repaired by the nexat company and with their proprietary parts, which means that you are bound hand and foot to them.
Someone needs to work with Giants to officially get this into Farming Simulator. There's never been anything like it, and the marketing would be a great opportunity!
I am not a cropping farmer but when as an Ag student here in Australia nearly fifty years ago worked on cropping farms. I find this technology amazing especially when I think what we worked with at the time. Of coarse at that time we thought we had very good machinery. Do remember one agronomy lecturer talking about guidance systems. It was thought it would operate through underground wires placed in the paddocks (fields). Never thought it would come from the sky.
if you considere the usa experience the support is also coming from the sky and not alone you have to move your machine to the neaest dealer if your machine computer is bugging
Honestly, the first time I discovered this machine back in February, I was amazed and never did I see agricultural machines the same way again. This is so clever.
I can totally relate! Discovering this machine was a game-changer for me too. It's incredible how innovation can reshape our perspective on agricultural machines.
I have followed Nexat as closely as I could within my means and this product seems very revolutionary indeed. The way I see it, it might be just a matter of time before this system will become more popular and perhaps commonplace. Good luck to the team!
I think it will become quite popular in specific regions, but I don’t see it being viable everywhere. Definitely amazing to watch though, and I would love to see it
These are very majestic in their presence, I would like to see one up close one day. Can't wait to see these all over the fields of Norway, 'The Martian' style 😁
@@omnianti0 what?? We are very flat area and we already farm with CTF and we are retaining stubble and applying soil biology to build soil not grow in dirt
@@Hugh_magoo the lone hope is to make vegetal enclosure each km square else its weather problem in this video its balant than field are large as the horizon
It would be great to see the mounting and integration systems open sourced, enabling more companies to produce compatible attachments. Collaboration benefits the industry as a whole.
There was a machine in the 1970s or 1980s called the Dowler Gantry. It used the same system as is shown here. It was 12m wide and was designed for multiple applications. I don’t think it progressed beyond the development stage.
All of us who planted or harvested any time in life know this is the next big thing. One machine to do it all except for plowing and cultivation. It should reduce machinery costs as well as fuel costs. If you could add John Deere's new spot fertilization system to it, you would have massive savings for farmers. You are well on the way to mass use. Congratulations on a fine machine!
Amazing content! Regarding the vehicles featured, I'm curious if they have specific left and right-sided cockpits or if they can operate in either direction?
Hello from the Philippines! I hope they make no tillage attachements (blade crimpers with seeders) and stripper heads. I think their vision of CFT works well with no/reduced tillage agriculture.
I'd like to see them test this in South Dakota, both east and west side. Same state completely different soil and farming / ranching. I think they will have a little harder time!
Well, if you want to maintain controlled traffic, the wheels will need to be spaced about 30’ from one another. This machine is impressive, but controlled traffic could be maintained with equipment that’s readily available.
About the only major criticism that I'd have for the Nexat carrier is the use of Liebherr engines for the North American & especially the Australian Markets. Liebherr doesn't have the market presence compared to say Cummins engines in Rural Australia, where parts can be held on stock at rural Diesel Mechanics workshops or next day delivery & fitment. Otherwise Nexat is an intriguing premise for Broadacre Grain farming in Australia.
that will probably change, when they introduce it into the American marked. Just look at other European tractors in US, many of them is using US engines in US, but the brand own engine in Europa
@@KNJensen that's due to the chains, not the machine. I don't get it either. It looks cool and all, but: - Every tractor is basically a multi-tool support. - Combines have that asset of being just behind the header. In this one, you're on the side, and you can see the dude constantly checking the cams. This shows it being unpractical somehow. Tractors have the working tool behind, which is less practical as you have to turn around, but gives you a more overview once you do it. Seeing it from the side isn't really the perfect middle ground. - This machine has specific tools with specific lengths and dimensions limitations (not to mention weight). A conventional tractor can operate whatever it can pull, no matter the size or dimensions. - Changing to this machinery would basically mean changing every last machine you already own. This is ultra expensive, and there'll be little compatibility between the two.
Nexat's fate is that of the Fendt Trisix: in a couple years, it'll be history. It doesn't bring anything new, it is not revolutionary (no matter how much they try to push it), it is not disruptive, it does not reinvent the wheel. Plus, everything you know about agricultural equipment, you can throw it out since this monster is all electric.
This is a really neat idea for a machine however one drawback comes to mind. The old saying of never put all your eggs in one basket applies here in many ways. Machines break. That's just a fact of life. So what happens when you only have one of these to handle multiple jobs and it's down for a day or a week? You get behind. Today if a machine breaks oftentimes farmers have a backup machine or a different machine and can do a different job to keep up while the broken machine gets fixed. But when only one machine does almost ALL the jobs and breaks? You're screwed. Neat idea though and I hope the people who produce these carve out a nice market for them because I can see the benefit of it. It's just there are drawbacks.
Would like to see the cost/ha to procure and operate a unit on the perceived lifespan compared to conventional machines as well as the amount of hectares per season it can cultivate. I suspect only the super highly susidised European operations will be able to operate this.
Why no dealers/info in North/South America. Having 33000 acres in NA and 64000 HA in SA, we could use these units for wheat, soya, maize, and sunflowers. Cost and service are king!
I think it's mostly the wheels. Notice how they're on the outside, and that they keep in the same ruts. So that each time it turns to do another row, one side is re-using a rut from the last row. On a regular tractor, you'd have two, or four ruts if they have those double back wheels, make each row, and since regular tractors have their wheels well inside of the reach of their harvester/plow/seeders/etc, that means that they can't be re-used, which means less room for crops. What the NEXAT does is have big rows of dense crops between wide wheel ruts, letting you get more crop per unit of land since you need so much less space for wheels.
2 роки тому
@@mattheweverett2227 that gigh density gives whoole bunch of problems. All sortst of diseases on crops due to lack of ventilation. On regular farming when load is balanced with weight seeds are placed on all field equaly even at those places where wheele or track went. Also technological tracs are made while seeding they span for 24-36 meters nowadays even more
Damn. I like the Nexat concept, but I hate it suffering the same fate as a Yugo. I hope this war does not kill the concept and I hope replacement prototypes are waiting in the wings.
I don’t really see the benefit. You still have a a tractor pulling implements. What does the combine module cost and what is its thrashing capacity? Example, what would an equal sized combine cost? Though if this machine goes down your entire operation is at an all stop.
Saw a UA-camr say this will be impossible because it will get stuck the first time it goes in mud. I'd recommend proving him wrong with video demonstrations. Would be interesting to see semi robotic axle arms that allow it to "walk" out of mud.
next design will be a 2.0 series, one will be able to cultivate the ground, and right behind it, will be the attachment to plant. it will reduce fuel/energy by 1, cultivating, then 2 seconds later will be able to seed the ground.
I think the problem is that this is a specialised piece of equipment, and for what it is it doesnt do anything that an existing combine or tractor can't, ther header size is smaller than the largest with 60 foot headers, there are larger tillage and spraying equipment, and the reality is that capital cost of equipment for massive farms is one of the smallest expenses, parts support and servicing are number 1, and this thing is so far from standard i cant see parts support and servicing being easy or viable.
As for work width, this currently runs in europe. Twelve meters is about the largest tillage or harvesting equipment that exists here. 13,7m headers max, but these usually dont run CTF. A 70m Sprayer is like double the usual size. And there is no reason they wouldnt be able to make it bigger for other markets. It beeing a standardized machine could also decrease part cost and make supply easier. Most things that are going to brake will likely be the module stuff anyways, which are mostly parts from already existing equipment from other manufacturers (like Väderstad). Service is where I completely aggree though. How they will handle that will likely make or brake this innovation, no doubt.
Yep, can't replace the tractor; and the existing tech (and older) is more than adequate to get the job done. It is cool but out of reach for the majority of farms.
Hearing that 3 US corporations got hold of over 19 million hectares(no its not typo), in Ukraine… and those same corps are also part of military-industrial-complex of the US… I can bet who were the customers for this monstrosity! The ordinary ukranian farmer couldn’t afford itself a cheap Belarus tractor even a used one. Even if it wasn’t for this war, the people of Ukraine had lost the battle against the big evil corporations…
If you still use tillage you are living a century out of date. Regenerative Agriculture does even more for less cost. Catch up. The light footprint looks fantastic.
One issue - This multi tool uses the same 1100hp engine for ALL tasks - whether it’s needed or not. Not all tasks require maximum horsepower with the accompanying fuel usage.
You make a valid point. Having the flexibility to adjust the power output based on the task at hand would be beneficial in terms of fuel efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
Looks amazing but dos efficiency on the land take away from safety on the road in this case as well? I’m a bit tired of the argument “I produce your food so I should be able to do what ever I want”. I really don’t need to eat much when it’s my face that just got harvested, ploughed, tilted and reseeded.
When someone tells you their machine is easier to use and more compatible. All that means is it’s a pain in the a$$ to work on, and is more expensive. I don’t care about versatility if downtime will place a project behind more traditional methods. If a break down occurs, it should be fixed in the field. Looks like a lot of hydraulics on that machine. Hoses often burst, pinch, or wear out. What if the hydraulic oil everywhere. Many many yards/meters of wires. Often wires rub raw. And in the farm environment there are mice and rats that create havoc among equipment. It’s great to dream and innovate, but we must stay grounded to succeed.
This machine is technically feasible but financially non viable due to it's obvious cost to buy and maintain. The other obvious downside is it's weght which makes it useless in soft soil conditions and in mud it would bury itself, but still a cool concept. A better idea would be small robots tilling and planting working off solar power, i think the future is in small engineering not big.
Think has to weigh in excess of 100,000lb. Thats on tracks not much bigger than say a Deere s790. Single wet spring and you'd have that thing buried to the frame. On wet years even a 8R or 9R with 700+ duals or even triples struggle for traction, at a fraction the weight of this thing
@@FarmworldTV They might be, but its not gone sell, The machine don't plant peanuts or cotton or harvest peanuts or cotton, them Midwest farmers might buy it, but not farmers in southern states in America its no use for it
Imagine this one the big farms in Australia… certainly going to be a game changer… No use in America I wouldn’t have thought, farms wouldn’t be large enough ?
You'd be surprised, there's some massive operations in the grainbelt of the USA and Canada, see Mike Mitchell on UA-cam that operation has 6 to 8 Fendt Ideal combines in class 8 to 9 and has trialled a class 10 all running at least a 55 foot header each,as well as at least one or 2 John Deere s780.
@@shanemay3797 Australian grain belt guys buy harvesters in lots of 50 !… similar to China… those are the biggest farmers in the world…. We’re beginners compared to them…. 😉😉😉
Don’t reckon it could sow 2400 acres in 24 hrs as was done in QLD some years ago with existing trailing airseeder. Looks too capital intensive for the small area covered.
Це Україна, синку. Так німецькі новітні технології з українськими можливостями творять чудеса і обходять по ефективності абсолютно весь світ на покоління вперед
Seems like these machines could be fully automated if they drive in the exakt same tracks all the time. Fields probably have to be quite flat at least. Automated food production, more unemployed people. What kind of future are we heading towards, very few people will actually find any work.
Agriculture barely employs anyone as is. It's already super automated and dominated by big agro corps who have pushed efficiency as hard as they can for max profits. At this point it might not even cost jobs, just cut some hours off those jobs, because the biggest need for drivers is during planting and harvesting, and farmers can work up to 18+ hour days during those times.
This is my dream before my eyes! Amazing work.
From Uganda, a small East African country, we're a food basket for the entire East and Central Africa for generations.
With machines like this, with such fertile soils, absolute tropical seasons, can only be thankful to God.
May God have mercy on Ukraine and there's a peaceful resolution to the war.
I'd like such a machine and more of it for sure.
Probably costs more than Uganda’s GDP
@@blauer2551 probably not ....a funny joke at all!
GDP doesn't always reflect the actual story as there're so many variables involved.
Besides, the world we live today has no place for such a level of ignorance 🙃
@@kakyalidaniel9607 Well I can tell you most American farmers couldn’t dream of such a purchase. The joke is the price of equipment, even used, and how much maintenance and repairs are.
@@satunnainenkatselija4478What do you consider not that expensive?
@@satunnainenkatselija4478 "It needs to be serviceable by local technicians"
They can only be maintained and repaired by the nexat company and with their proprietary parts, which means that you are bound hand and foot to them.
Someone needs to work with Giants to officially get this into Farming Simulator. There's never been anything like it, and the marketing would be a great opportunity!
Awesome idea!! I have 795h in Fs19 and 215h in FS22 so far! Would love to use it on one of the 4x maps!!
So people are dying anothers are coming,,, farming???? Ssso productive and sso non ucrainians??? Is this the message??
I completely agree! We need a NEXAT DLC!
Very basic machinery, not really an advancement when taking into consideration cost per unit+ upkeep+ the ground it can/cannot operate on!
I definitely wanna drive one in fs22
I am not a cropping farmer but when as an Ag student here in Australia nearly fifty years ago worked on cropping farms. I find this technology amazing especially when I think what we worked with at the time. Of coarse at that time we thought we had very good machinery. Do remember one agronomy lecturer talking about guidance systems. It was thought it would operate through underground wires placed in the paddocks (fields). Never thought it would come from the sky.
if you considere the usa experience the support is also coming from the sky and not alone you have to move your machine to the neaest dealer if your machine computer is bugging
See if you can find anything on the mollerin monster
Honestly, the first time I discovered this machine back in February, I was amazed and never did I see agricultural machines the same way again. This is so clever.
I can totally relate! Discovering this machine was a game-changer for me too. It's incredible how innovation can reshape our perspective on agricultural machines.
this machine is breathtaking would love to see one adapted for vegitable farming also a smaller model for smaller farms
bet on unmanned version of all size next the mecanic is really well designed
I have followed Nexat as closely as I could within my means and this product seems very revolutionary indeed.
The way I see it, it might be just a matter of time before this system will become more popular and perhaps commonplace.
Good luck to the team!
Thanks for watching our channel!!
I think it will become quite popular in specific regions, but I don’t see it being viable everywhere. Definitely amazing to watch though, and I would love to see it
@@Beyonder8335 i can be only viable if their is compensation forest all around if not let face weather events
The NEXAT 1100 is truly a great machine.
great creators
These are very majestic in their presence, I would like to see one up close one day. Can't wait to see these all over the fields of Norway, 'The Martian' style 😁
Norway ? Last time I was there it was all small fields nothing like these prairies in Ukraine !
@@charlestaylor8566 maybe beacuse legal protection of bio diversity?
I cannot wait for one to make it to Australia, any luck it may be mine! This is efficiency, this is the future
if your tornado dont flat your farm before
@@omnianti0 what?? We are very flat area and we already farm with CTF and we are retaining stubble and applying soil biology to build soil not grow in dirt
@@Hugh_magoo the lone hope is to make vegetal enclosure each km square else its weather problem in this video its balant than field are large as the horizon
It's the next generation of farm equipment
Thanks for the update. I was worried about the models in Ukraine. I hope they aren’t damaged or destroyed.
I feel the same way with you too Greg, anyways is just to say Hi and someone to share time to talk with, hoping you are doing well down there?
Same here! Hope everything will be ok soon...
@@Rhamirezz85 how are you doing???
Well lets hope the people of ukraine is safe first of all..
Most of Ukraine west of the Donbas region are fairly safe at the moment on worry would be from fighter planes !
Great video ánd machinery!
I subscribed to this channel back when the first video on this came out. So glad to see the follow up after all this time!
Looks very affordable, I’ll take two
Will the mounting and integration systems be open sourced eventually for other companies to produce attachments?
It would be great to see the mounting and integration systems open sourced, enabling more companies to produce compatible attachments. Collaboration benefits the industry as a whole.
There was a machine in the 1970s or 1980s called the Dowler Gantry. It used the same system as is shown here. It was 12m wide and was designed for multiple applications. I don’t think it progressed beyond the development stage.
All of us who planted or harvested any time in life know this is the next big thing. One machine to do it all except for plowing and cultivation. It should reduce machinery costs as well as fuel costs. If you could add John Deere's new spot fertilization system to it, you would have massive savings for farmers. You are well on the way to mass use. Congratulations on a fine machine!
Great video! Have a question, Are there left and right sided cockpits or is the vehicle just able either direction?
Amazing content! Regarding the vehicles featured, I'm curious if they have specific left and right-sided cockpits or if they can operate in either direction?
"testing out some of the new features... in Ukraine." Armor? Tank towing? Mine sweeping?
Hello from the Philippines! I hope they make no tillage attachements (blade crimpers with seeders) and stripper heads. I think their vision of CFT works well with no/reduced tillage agriculture.
I'd like to see them test this in South Dakota, both east and west side. Same state completely different soil and farming / ranching. I think they will have a little harder time!
Unfortunately I doubt we will ever see Nexat in Ireland.. An amazing machine full of potential. An engineering masterpiece 👏👏
This is only for countries with vast acreages.
I'm immediately wondering how many tanks this machine can pull
Well, if you want to maintain controlled traffic, the wheels will need to be spaced about 30’ from one another. This machine is impressive, but controlled traffic could be maintained with equipment that’s readily available.
About the only major criticism that I'd have for the Nexat carrier is the use of Liebherr engines for the North American & especially the Australian Markets.
Liebherr doesn't have the market presence compared to say Cummins engines in Rural Australia, where parts can be held on stock at rural Diesel Mechanics workshops or next day delivery & fitment.
Otherwise Nexat is an intriguing premise for Broadacre Grain farming in Australia.
that will probably change, when they introduce it into the American marked. Just look at other European tractors in US, many of them is using US engines in US, but the brand own engine in Europa
Looks really cool. But why would you choose this over conventional equipment?
Watch the original video or NEXATs own. It massively reduces compaction :)
@@KNJensen that's due to the chains, not the machine.
I don't get it either. It looks cool and all, but:
- Every tractor is basically a multi-tool support.
- Combines have that asset of being just behind the header. In this one, you're on the side, and you can see the dude constantly checking the cams. This shows it being unpractical somehow. Tractors have the working tool behind, which is less practical as you have to turn around, but gives you a more overview once you do it. Seeing it from the side isn't really the perfect middle ground.
- This machine has specific tools with specific lengths and dimensions limitations (not to mention weight). A conventional tractor can operate whatever it can pull, no matter the size or dimensions.
- Changing to this machinery would basically mean changing every last machine you already own. This is ultra expensive, and there'll be little compatibility between the two.
Nexat's fate is that of the Fendt Trisix: in a couple years, it'll be history. It doesn't bring anything new, it is not revolutionary (no matter how much they try to push it), it is not disruptive, it does not reinvent the wheel. Plus, everything you know about agricultural equipment, you can throw it out since this monster is all electric.
This is really a giant transformer agricultural machine.
Iam from Indonesia this equipment so amazing. I hope one day i Will use this for my farm in Borneo!
you need just a million dollar for it
any plans for enter Australia?😁
What is the minimum acreage that makes this viable. Obviously making it modular would be a next step.
Amazing !!!
Thanks!
This is a really neat idea for a machine however one drawback comes to mind. The old saying of never put all your eggs in one basket applies here in many ways. Machines break. That's just a fact of life. So what happens when you only have one of these to handle multiple jobs and it's down for a day or a week? You get behind. Today if a machine breaks oftentimes farmers have a backup machine or a different machine and can do a different job to keep up while the broken machine gets fixed. But when only one machine does almost ALL the jobs and breaks? You're screwed.
Neat idea though and I hope the people who produce these carve out a nice market for them because I can see the benefit of it. It's just there are drawbacks.
will nexat develop header for cutting hay?
That is one sweet machine
Very impressive
yes
Seems like an infinitely modifiable concept. Lengthen or shorten the center section and create whole new series of attachments.
Interesting , Thank You . I hope they work . New teck is interesting
Will there be applications for cotton?
I think they are working on other tasks before ;)
This is the future.
Great video!
Thanks!
Great to see someone thinking outside the box, won’t be long before one of the “big ones” either buy or steal this.
Any idea of the price of the beast?
is it solar powered
😆Another great recommendation at home page. Creative! All day i watch this.
That’s the future some machine
So freaking empressive
Love the heavy equipment too, what are you up to today Ronnie ?
Nice
Will it harvest Tiberium?
We are waiting for the development of the harvest module 🙃😄
Very nice piece of equipment. I hope to see it in Canada someday!
Nexat is gonna come to the US this year. So Canada will be also on their list, I am sure 😉
Would like to see the cost/ha to procure and operate a unit on the perceived lifespan compared to conventional machines as well as the amount of hectares per season it can cultivate. I suspect only the super highly susidised European operations will be able to operate this.
Very interesting
I want this equipment. Where to buy in USA?
Please use the contact form via www.nexat.de/en/
Why no dealers/info in North/South America. Having 33000 acres in NA and 64000 HA in SA, we could use these units for wheat, soya, maize, and sunflowers. Cost and service are king!
futuriste et vraiment impressionnant: combien valent ces machines?
Z V wat is het voordeel van een Nexat
I still don’t get it how is this more eficient that regular tractors and implements?
I think it's mostly the wheels. Notice how they're on the outside, and that they keep in the same ruts. So that each time it turns to do another row, one side is re-using a rut from the last row. On a regular tractor, you'd have two, or four ruts if they have those double back wheels, make each row, and since regular tractors have their wheels well inside of the reach of their harvester/plow/seeders/etc, that means that they can't be re-used, which means less room for crops. What the NEXAT does is have big rows of dense crops between wide wheel ruts, letting you get more crop per unit of land since you need so much less space for wheels.
@@mattheweverett2227 that gigh density gives whoole bunch of problems. All sortst of diseases on crops due to lack of ventilation. On regular farming when load is balanced with weight seeds are placed on all field equaly even at those places where wheele or track went. Also technological tracs are made while seeding they span for 24-36 meters nowadays even more
how many billions this thing costs? :D
2.7 million dollars apparently
Damn. I like the Nexat concept, but I hate it suffering the same fate as a Yugo. I hope this war does not kill the concept and I hope replacement prototypes are waiting in the wings.
I don’t really see the benefit. You still have a a tractor pulling implements. What does the combine module cost and what is its thrashing capacity? Example, what would an equal sized combine cost?
Though if this machine goes down your entire operation is at an all stop.
Технології розвиваються це добре
Saw a UA-camr say this will be impossible because it will get stuck the first time it goes in mud. I'd recommend proving him wrong with video demonstrations. Would be interesting to see semi robotic axle arms that allow it to "walk" out of mud.
What happens when you get stuck in the mud?
Cool
next design will be a 2.0 series, one will be able to cultivate the ground, and right behind it, will be the attachment to plant. it will reduce fuel/energy by 1, cultivating, then 2 seconds later will be able to seed the ground.
Price. ?
Someone needs to show this to @Laura Farms :-)
I think the problem is that this is a specialised piece of equipment, and for what it is it doesnt do anything that an existing combine or tractor can't, ther header size is smaller than the largest with 60 foot headers, there are larger tillage and spraying equipment, and the reality is that capital cost of equipment for massive farms is one of the smallest expenses, parts support and servicing are number 1, and this thing is so far from standard i cant see parts support and servicing being easy or viable.
As for work width, this currently runs in europe. Twelve meters is about the largest tillage or harvesting equipment that exists here. 13,7m headers max, but these usually dont run CTF. A 70m Sprayer is like double the usual size. And there is no reason they wouldnt be able to make it bigger for other markets.
It beeing a standardized machine could also decrease part cost and make supply easier. Most things that are going to brake will likely be the module stuff anyways, which are mostly parts from already existing equipment from other manufacturers (like Väderstad).
Service is where I completely aggree though. How they will handle that will likely make or brake this innovation, no doubt.
Yep, can't replace the tractor; and the existing tech (and older) is more than adequate to get the job done. It is cool but out of reach for the majority of farms.
Hearing that 3 US corporations got hold of over 19 million hectares(no its not typo), in Ukraine… and those same corps are also part of military-industrial-complex of the US…
I can bet who were the customers for this monstrosity!
The ordinary ukranian farmer couldn’t afford itself a cheap Belarus tractor even a used one. Even if it wasn’t for this war, the people of Ukraine had lost the battle against the big evil corporations…
If you still use tillage you are living a century out of date. Regenerative Agriculture does even more for less cost. Catch up. The light footprint looks fantastic.
Will it tow a tank?
Not big enough we already are running 50 and 60 ft headers on regular machines. Up to 100ft seeders and 120 ft rowcrop seeders for corn
That's impressive! It seems like the industry is already pushing the boundaries with larger equipment for increased efficiency and productivity.
One issue - This multi tool uses the same 1100hp engine for ALL tasks - whether it’s needed or not. Not all tasks require maximum horsepower with the accompanying fuel usage.
There are two Diesel engines powering four electric motors. Jobs like spraying can be done with only one Diesel engine
You make a valid point. Having the flexibility to adjust the power output based on the task at hand would be beneficial in terms of fuel efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
Looks amazing but dos efficiency on the land take away from safety on the road in this case as well? I’m a bit tired of the argument “I produce your food so I should be able to do what ever I want”. I really don’t need to eat much when it’s my face that just got harvested, ploughed, tilted and reseeded.
Сколько стоит?
I'll take 2
It looks like the same kind of concept of new ideas uni harvester from the 1970s.
How much $$
When someone tells you their machine is easier to use and more compatible. All that means is it’s a pain in the a$$ to work on, and is more expensive. I don’t care about versatility if downtime will place a project behind more traditional methods. If a break down occurs, it should be fixed in the field. Looks like a lot of hydraulics on that machine. Hoses often burst, pinch, or wear out. What if the hydraulic oil everywhere. Many many yards/meters of wires. Often wires rub raw. And in the farm environment there are mice and rats that create havoc among equipment. It’s great to dream and innovate, but we must stay grounded to succeed.
Go Ukraine farm engineering and what next generation machine.🌄🌄🌄🎆🎆🎆🎆
Sve će e u dati da drugi radi za njih jeftino
Que tal eu vender essa maquina no Brasil! UAU..
Another brilliant agrarian concept from ze germans....now Fendt and Claas are only left with deep ploughing!
WOW !!!!!
This machine is technically feasible but financially non viable due to it's obvious cost to buy and maintain. The other obvious downside is it's weght which makes it useless in soft soil conditions and in mud it would bury itself, but still a cool concept. A better idea would be small robots tilling and planting working off solar power, i think the future is in small engineering not big.
Go Ukraine Go, May God be with them (all Ukrainians) in their fight for FREEDOM
No sympathize for Ukraine but the machine is something new, I like it.
Man how do I get that on my farm in Illinois 🤣
Think has to weigh in excess of 100,000lb. Thats on tracks not much bigger than say a Deere s790. Single wet spring and you'd have that thing buried to the frame. On wet years even a 8R or 9R with 700+ duals or even triples struggle for traction, at a fraction the weight of this thing
This is a stupendous machine, though I would like to see a greener and cheaper propulsion method than expensive and polluting diesel fuel.
They did say that they're working on a fuel cell version.
@@mattheweverett2227 Yes they did Matthew, but 95% of H2 is made from petrolium oil, so ...
If it were up to Joe Biden, he would require that Nexat run on unicorn farts and solar energy.
I don't think this machine will sell in America at all
First one will be out there this summer 😉
@@FarmworldTV They might be, but its not gone sell, The machine don't plant peanuts or cotton or harvest peanuts or cotton, them Midwest farmers might buy it, but not farmers in southern states in America its no use for it
It ain’t wide enough for tillage
Muito. Tecnologia. Bom isso. E. Futuro. Isso. E. Vida. Produz. Vida. Alimentos se. Não tiver. Alimento não. Haverá vida fome. Produz o fim da vida
Wow, what a New Idea ! /sarcasm
Id hate to get one bogged
come use ur gear at my farm in austraila
we have a bit of sand to trial on
Imagine this one the big farms in Australia… certainly going to be a game changer…
No use in America I wouldn’t have thought, farms wouldn’t be large enough ?
You'd be surprised, there's some massive operations in the grainbelt of the USA and Canada, see Mike Mitchell on UA-cam that operation has 6 to 8 Fendt Ideal combines in class 8 to 9 and has trialled a class 10 all running at least a 55 foot header each,as well as at least one or 2 John Deere s780.
@@shanemay3797 Australian grain belt guys buy harvesters in lots of 50 !… similar to China… those are the biggest farmers in the world…. We’re beginners compared to them…. 😉😉😉
Don’t reckon it could sow 2400 acres in 24 hrs as was done in QLD some years ago with existing trailing airseeder. Looks too capital intensive for the small area covered.
Це Україна, синку. Так німецькі новітні технології з українськими можливостями творять чудеса і обходять по ефективності абсолютно весь світ на покоління вперед
Those crazy Germans
I don't understand why the Brits are obsessed with Ukraine 😟😟 Bojo was not able to sleep at night🤣🤣
👍🇵🇹
Seems like these machines could be fully automated if they drive in the exakt same tracks all the time. Fields probably have to be quite flat at least. Automated food production, more unemployed people. What kind of future are we heading towards, very few people will actually find any work.
Agriculture barely employs anyone as is. It's already super automated and dominated by big agro corps who have pushed efficiency as hard as they can for max profits. At this point it might not even cost jobs, just cut some hours off those jobs, because the biggest need for drivers is during planting and harvesting, and farmers can work up to 18+ hour days during those times.