Tchaikovsky Symphony No 7 (by Tchaikovsky Foundation with Pyotr Klimov)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 тра 2021
- Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky's Symphony in E-flat, was commenced after Symphony No. 5, and was intended to be his Sixth Symphony. Tchaikovsky abandoned this work in 1892, only to reuse the first movement in the single-movement Third Piano Concerto, Op. 75, first performed and published after his death in 1895.
A reconstruction of the original symphony from the sketches and various reworkings was accomplished during 1951-1955 by Soviet composer Semyon Bogatyrev, who brought the symphony into finished, fully orchestrated form and issued the score as Tchaikovsky's "Symphony No 7 in E-flat major.
In 2005, a second reconstruction of the symphony, commissioned by the Tchaikovsky Fund, was completed by Russian composer Pyotr Klimov. It had its first public performance at the Tchaikovsky State House-Museum in Klin, near Moscow, by Symphony Orchestra of Russia led by conductor Tomomi Nishimoto 西本智実, on June 5, 2006, as shown in this video.
00:20 First Movement: Allegro brilliante
13:19 2st Movement: Andante
23:20 3rd Movement: Final Allegro Maestoso
36:30 Tchaikovsky:Andante Cantabile (encore)
After listening to both Bogatyrev's and Klimov's reconstructions, I would pick Bogatyriev's version of the first movement over Klimov's (with minimal differences between the two), but the second movement goes to Klimov hands down. He worked magic just as Tchaikovksy would have - despite the cello solo feeling a bit out of place in a Tchaikovksy symphony. For the finale, it's a tie. Kudos to the performers!
I would follow your blog/podcast
Maravillosa!!!
Sempre excelente . Eternamente fantástico .
I have had the Ormandy CD for years (Vinyl before that) love it!
Che bella Tomomi e che brava!
Sad to see no 3rd movement, as that was the highlight of the Bogatyrev reconstruction (from the composer's op. 72, # 10).
I am totally of your opinion. The 3rd is abslutely necessary. If I cut off a movement I will choose the finale which is empty and simply a formally required thing..
In fact the piano piece op. 72 N° 10 was originally written (in sketch form) as the scherzo of the symphony, but later arranged by Tchaikovsky for piano solo.
The finale is from the Finale op 79.
And also the second movement is from op. 79.
Brilliantly played and conducted. As this is a new reconstruction of this symphony I have to ask why there is no other (3rd), movement? Could it be that Bogatyrev's scherzo was considered inappropriate?
I am guessing at the thinking; as this is based upon the Op. 79 work which has a direct link to the abandoned E-flat symphony with further consideration for the concerto no. 3, a speculative movement was not included. It does seem fairly obvious that the no. 10 from the Op. 72 was the original scherzo for the E-flat symphony, as quite a few ideas that wound up in the later eighteen piano pieces were found with the abandoned symphony sketches.
@@kennethdower7425I think that you are right regarding the use by Bogatyriev of one of Tchaikovsky's piano pieces as the 7th's scherzo. It seems to fit well with rest of the symphony. The use after the composer's death of another of the piano pieces orchestrated and injected into the 4th act of Swan lake in the 1895 production doesn't work half as well to my mind. Apparently only the Royal Ballet and one of the Russian Ballet Companies have retained this insertion and I have yet to come across a music recording but have seen a DVD of the Royal Ballet and was baffled at what I saw and heard.
@@DougMorley1 This is a very fine performance. I do miss that Scherzo though.
Oh je, da könnte jemand aber mal Bild und Ton synchronisieren...
Hervorragende Aufführung! Mit der Fassung (verglichen mit Bogatyriev) kuss ich mich erst beschäftigen.
было круто
A Maestrina, não é apenas uma mulher bonita! ;ela é também muito competente mas, nesta 7ª Sinfonia não consegui perceber a presença de Tchaikovsky, que fez sua dramática despedida na 6ª Sinfonia. Acho que seria bom deixar pra lá, mas é apenas opinião minha.
Finale fingers down !
Fingers down and thumbs up for this marvelous music
Movements
1)1:00
2)13:25
3)23:23
32:12 👏👏👏
37:07 Encore
I prefer the 'original' reconstruction to this work as the slow movement in this work is mush in comparison. Also there are now many women conductors all over the world and they usually dress in an appropriate manner to match the musicians.
I can't imagine any male conductors wearing that jacket with such appliques. I like it.
1:01
But now listen to the Ormandy Philadelphia version, recorded when they were at their peak. In my opinion it is miles better.
Well, that's a peak orchestra at their peak. What can beat that!
It's another version, by the way. The S. Bogatyriev completition, not Klimov.
She needs a serious one on one consultation with Yuja Wang🤣
Foutaise , absolument indigne de UA-cam, car il s'agit de la symphonie dite "Manfred" de Tchaikovsky, mais qui est ici honteusement tronquée. Reportez vous à d'autres versions, heureusement présentes sur UA-cam, que vous trouverez aisément. Personnellement j'en avais entendu l'intégrale au Festival de Radio-France de Montpellier ( mais je ne me souviens plus de l'année, brillamment dirigée par le grand Svetlanov, hélas disparu peu après. Dans l'immédiat, je vous suggère d'écouter sur ce site la version de Petrenko.
Cette œuvre n'a aucun rapport avec la Symphonie Manfred, qui a été composée entre les symphonies 4 et 5.
Celle-ci est une tentative de reconstitution d'une symphonie en mi bémol majeur (Manfred était en si mineur) composé après la cinquième, puis abandonnée par Tchaikovsky en 1892. Il en a finalement recyclée les esquisses dans son troisième concerto.
Wie kommen Sie darauf , dass es sich hier um die Manfred Sinfonie handelt ? Googeln Sie hier und Sie werden ein anderes Werk finden.
I am not providing anything new when I comment that there have been several attempts over the years to 'rescue' Tchaikovsky's '7th Symphony' with none of them really satisfactory. As I recall, Tchaikovsky left no material for the 4th movement and various completions of the other movements. This is the fourth attempt I know of, with all giving some insight into Tchaikovsky's efforts toward composing a 7th symphony. When viewed' 'from afar' none show anything other than to suggest the reason why the composer abandoned the work. With the case before us, I would start by observing that I can see no valid reason for adding the Andante Cantabile to provide a 4th movement. It would have been better left as a 3-movement work (demonstrated by the audience intense applause at that point, the Andante Cantabile ending up as an encore), even though it glaringly exposes one of the most banal of Tchaikovsky's tunes (played here most unenthusiastically), furthering the merits of the school who opposes any attempt to rescue the work. Personally, I think this performance is interesting and worth hearing for various reasons, but doesn't breath any fresh life into the already enjoyable catalog of the composer.
The piano piece op. 72 N° 10 was the original scherzo of the symphony, but Tchaikovsky transformed it into the piano solo piece when discarded the symphony. The last movement of the symphony was left in sketch form (7 pages), but he arranged it in a 2-piano sketch to be the finale of the third piano concerto, in this form he completed it.
Thanks, Nishimoto! I love ❤
うーむ。やっぱりチャイコフスキーとは違うな、無理して世に出す必要はなかったかも。
Utami Hayashishita seems to be a good conductor
I'm sorry to say it but the seventh, by whomever reconstructed it, is trash. I'm generally a big fan of reconstructing lost musical works in order to listen what might have been, but this just doesn't even come close to Tchaikovsky's usual, VERY high level.
The conductor is horrible ! ! ! 👎 👎 👎
How do you know? What musical basis do you have for this? Or, is it you just don't like here on prejudiced lines...
Why?
I suppose you would prefer Arthur Fiedler. I like her.
She is outstanding ❤
A poor version and low quality orchestra for a Tchaikovsky's work.
Have I read this comment correctly?
Silly comment-actually quite stupid.
Comentario de un completo idiota
@@bloodgrss He must be deaf (or bigotted).